We Keep Coding

How to catch a Typeorm transaction error in NestJs

I have a server side written in node.js and nestJs, querying with typeorm.
I'm trying to wrap some query's to the database with transaction as suggested here with some changes inspired by typeorm's docs, like this:
getManager().transaction(async transactionalEntityManager => {
transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity>(newEntity)
transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity1>(newEntity1)
});
The transaction works well and rollback the database if there was an error.
tested this way:
getManager().transaction(async transactionalEntityManager => {
transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity>(newEntity)
throw 'There is an error'
transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity1>(newEntity1)
});
The execution of the transaction is inside a graphQL Mutation, so I should return an error to the client if something went wrong, the problem is that I can't catch the errors from the transaction.
Tried doing this:
#Mutation(returns => Entity)
async create(): Promise<Entity> {
let entity = null;
let error = null;
getManager().transaction(async transactionalEntityManager => {
try {
entity = await transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity>(newEntity)
await transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity1>(newEntity1);
} catch (err) {
error = err
}
})
if (error) {
return error
}
return entity
}
when I throw error I catch it successfully, but when a real error occurs I can console.log() it in the server but it never reaches to return to the client.

You are not awaiting your transaction to finish thus, the exception can be thrown after your function call end and you don't get the exception.
Just await your transaction and it should be fine.
await getManager().transaction(async transactionalEntityManager => {
...
throw 'ERROR THAT SHOULD BE CATCHED'
}
Also it returns the result of the inner function so it can be useful.
const ok = await getManager().transaction(async transactionalEntityManager => {
await transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity>(newEntity)
await transactionalEntityManager.save<Entity>(newEntity2)
return 'OK'
}

How to use single catch function for nested async await?

I have this code:
on('connection', async(socket) => {
try {
const promises = members.map(async(member) => {
try {
const users = await User.find({})
const _promises = users.map(async() => {
try {
//some code here
} catch (err) {
console.log(err)
}
})
await Promise.all(_promises)
} catch (err) {
console.log(err)
}
})
await Promise.all(promises)
} catch (err) {
console.log(err)
throw err
}
})
As you can see I have a try catch for each nested async function. Would it be possible to tweak the code to use only a single catch, or to simplify things somehow?

You can have just a single await at the top level of the handler. If the Promises spawned inside it all chain together to a Promise which is awaited at the top level (like in your example), that top await will catch errors thrown anywhere inside.
But, your catch section should not throw another error unless .on handles Promise rejections as well, otherwise you'll get an unhandled Promise rejection:
on('connection', async(socket) => {
try {
const promises = members.map(async(member) => {
const users = await User.find({})
const _promises = users.map(async() => {
//some code here which may throw
});
await Promise.all(_promises);
});
await Promise.all(promises);
} catch (err) {
console.log(err);
}
})
If await User.find throws, then the promises array will contain a Promise which rejects, which mean that the top await Promise.all(promises); will throw and be caught
If something inside users.map throws, _promises will contain a Promise which rejects, so await Promise.all(_promises); will throw. But that's inside the const promises = members.map callback, so that will result in promises containing a rejected Promise too - so it will be caught by the await Promise.all(promises); as well.

If a function you call throws an error, the error will fall back to the nearest catch block the function call is enclosed in.
try {
throw "an error";
}
catch(e) {
console.log(e); //output: "an error"
}
Now consider this
try {
try {
throw "an error";
}
catch(e) {
console.log(e); //output: "an error"
}
}
catch(e) {
console.log(e); //This line is not going to be executed
}
This mechanism enables attachment of more error information to the generated error in each level. Imagine your error is an object and each nested catch bock attaching its own information to the error object an pass it along by throwing again.
Look at the following code:
try {
try {
throw {internalError: 101};
}
catch(e) {
//Attach more info and throw again
e.additionalInfo = 'Disconnected when gathering information';
throw e;
}
}
catch(e) {
e.message = 'Cannot get information'
console.log(e); //Final error with lot of information
}

How to properly handle error in MongoDB bulkwrite? [duplicate]

I like the flatness of the new Async/Await feature available in Typescript, etc. However, I'm not sure I like the fact that I have to declare the variable I'm awaiting on the outside of a try...catch block in order to use it later. Like so:
let createdUser
try {
createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo)
} catch (error) {
console.error(error)
}
console.log(createdUser)
// business
// logic
// goes
// here
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to be best practice not to place multiple lines of business logic in the try body, so I'm left only with the alternative of declaring createdUser outside the block, assigning it in the block, and then using it after.
What is best practice in this instance?

It seems to be best practice not to place multiple lines of business logic in the try body
Actually I'd say it is. You usually want to catch all exceptions from working with the value:
try {
const createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo);
console.log(createdUser)
// business logic goes here
} catch (error) {
console.error(error) // from creation or business logic
}
If you want to catch and handle errors only from the promise, you have three choices:
Declare the variable outside, and branch depending on whether there was an exception or not. That can take various forms, like
assign a default value to the variable in the catch block
return early or re-throw an exception from the catch block
set a flag whether the catch block caught an exception, and test for it in an if condition
test for the value of the variable to have been assigned
let createdUser; // or use `var` inside the block
try {
createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo);
} catch (error) {
console.error(error) // from creation
}
if (createdUser) { // user was successfully created
console.log(createdUser)
// business logic goes here
}
Test the caught exception for its type, and handle or rethrow it based on that.
try {
const createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo);
// user was successfully created
console.log(createdUser)
// business logic goes here
} catch (error) {
if (error instanceof CreationError) {
console.error(error) // from creation
} else {
throw error;
}
}
Unfortunately, standard JavaScript (still) doesn't have syntax support for conditional exceptions.
If your method doesn't return promises that are rejected with specific enough errors, you can do that yourself by re-throwing something more appropriate in a .catch() handler:
try {
const createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo).catch(err => {
throw new CreationError(err.message, {code: "USER_CREATE"});
});
…
} …
See also Handling multiple catches in promise chain for the pre-async/await version of this.
Use then with two callbacks instead of try/catch. This really is the least ugly way and my personal recommendation also for its simplicity and correctness, not relying on tagged errors or looks of the result value to distinguish between fulfillment and rejection of the promise:
await this.User.create(userInfo).then(createdUser => {
// user was successfully created
console.log(createdUser)
// business logic goes here
}, error => {
console.error(error) // from creation
});
Of course it comes with the drawback of introducing callback functions, meaning you cannot as easily break/continue loops or do early returns from the outer function.

Another simpler approach is to append .catch to the promise function. ex:
const createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo).catch( error => {
// handle error
})

Cleaner code
using async/await with Promise catch handler.
From what I see, this has been a long-standing problem that has bugged (both meanings) many programmers and their code. The Promise .catch is really no different from try/catch.
Working harmoniously with await/async, ES6 Promise's catch handler provides a proper solution and make code cleaner:
const createUser = await this.User
.create(userInfo)
.catch(error => console.error(error))
console.log(createdUser)
// business
// logic
// goes
// here
Note that while this answers the question, it gobbles up the error. The intention must be for the execution to continue and not throw. In this case, it's usually always better to be explicit and return false from catch and check for user:
.catch(error => {
console.error(error);
return false
})
if (!createdUser) // stop operation
In this case, it is better to throw because (1) this operation (creating a user) is not expected to failed, and (2) you are likely not able to continue:
const createUser = await this.User
.create(userInfo)
.catch(error => {
// do what you need with the error
console.error(error)
// maybe send to Datadog or Sentry
// don't gobble up the error
throw error
})
console.log(createdUser)
// business
// logic
// goes
// here
Learning catch doesn't seem like worth it?
The cleanliness benefits may not be apparent above, but it adds up in real-world complex async operations.
As an illustration, besides creating user (this.User.create), we can push notification (this.pushNotification) and send email (this.sendEmail).
this.User.create
this.User.create = async(userInfo) => {
// collect some fb data and do some background check in parallel
const facebookDetails = await retrieveFacebookAsync(userInfo.email)
.catch(error => {
// we can do some special error handling
// and throw back the error
})
const backgroundCheck = await backgroundCheckAsync(userInfo.passportID)
if (backgroundCheck.pass !== true) throw Error('Background check failed')
// now we can insert everything
const createdUser = await Database.insert({ ...userInfo, ...facebookDetails })
return createdUser
}
this.pushNotifcation and this.sendEmail
this.pushNotification = async(userInfo) => {
const pushed = await PushNotificationProvider.send(userInfo)
return pushed
})
this.sendEmail = async(userInfo) => {
const sent = await mail({ to: userInfo.email, message: 'Welcome' })
return sent
})
Compose the operations:
const createdUser = await this.User
.create(userInfo)
.catch(error => {
// handle error
})
// business logic here
return await Promise.all([
this.pushNotification(userInfo),
this.sendEmail(userInfo)
]).catch(error => {
// handle errors caused
// by pushNotification or sendEmail
})
No try/catch. And it's clear what errors you are handling.

I usually use the Promise's catch() function to return an object with an error property on failure.
For example, in your case i'd do:
const createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo)
.catch(error => { error }); // <--- the added catch
if (Object(createdUser).error) {
console.error(error)
}
If you don't like to keep adding the catch() calls, you can add a helper function to the Function's prototype:
Function.prototype.withCatcher = function withCatcher() {
const result = this.apply(this, arguments);
if (!Object(result).catch) {
throw `${this.name}() must return a Promise when using withCatcher()`;
}
return result.catch(error => ({ error }));
};
And now you'll be able to do:
const createdUser = await this.User.create.withCatcher(userInfo);
if (Object(createdUser).error) {
console.error(createdUser.error);
}
EDIT 03/2020
You can also add a default "catch to an error object" function to the Promise object like so:
Promise.prototype.catchToObj = function catchToObj() {
return this.catch(error => ({ error }));
};
And then use it as follows:
const createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo).catchToObj();
if (createdUser && createdUser.error) {
console.error(createdUser.error);
}

#Bergi Answer is good, but I think it's not the best way because you have to go back to the old then() method, so i think a better way is to catch the error in the async function
async function someAsyncFunction(){
const createdUser = await this.User.create(userInfo);
console.log(createdUser)
}
someAsyncFunction().catch(console.log);
But what if we have many await in the same function and need to catch every error?
You may declare the to() function
function to(promise) {
return promise.then(data => {
return [null, data];
})
.catch(err => [err]);
}
And then
async function someAsyncFunction(){
let err, createdUser, anotherUser;
[err, createdUser] = await to(this.User.create(userInfo));
if (err) console.log(`Error is ${err}`);
else console.log(`createdUser is ${createdUser}`);
[err, anotherUser] = await to(this.User.create(anotherUserInfo));
if (err) console.log(`Error is ${err}`);
else console.log(`anotherUser is ${anotherUser}`);
}
someAsyncFunction();
When reading this its: "Wait to this.User.create".
Finally you can create the module "to.js" or simply use the await-to-js module.
You can get more information about to function in this post

await this.User.create(userInfo).then(async data => await this.emailService.sendEmail(data.email), async error => await this.sentryService.sendReport(error))

Async/Await error handling

I'm trying to handle a custom error that my async method throws, but the try catch block doesn't work appropriately.
I think the way I'm doing it should work but the error is not caught and the program terminates by displaying it in the terminal.
Here is where it throws the error:
async setupTap(tap) {
const model = this.connection.model('Tap', TapSchema);
await model.findOneAndUpdate({ id: tap.id }, tap, (err, result) => {
let error = null;
if (!result) {
throw new Error('Tap doesn\'t exists', 404);
}
return result;
});
}
Then, the error handling code:
async setupTapHandler(request, h) {
const tapData = {
id: request.params.id,
clientId: request.payload.clientId,
beerId: request.payload.beerId,
kegId: request.payload.kegId,
};
try {
await this.kegeratorApi.setupTap(tapData);
} catch (e) {
if (e.code === 404) return h.response().code(404);
}
return h.response().code(204);
}
Can someone help me?
I also looked at other topics:
Correct Try...Catch Syntax Using Async/Await
How to properly implement error handling in async/await case

You can only use await to successfully wait on an async operation if you are awaiting a promise. Assuming you are using mongoose, I don't know mongoose really well, but it appears that model.findOneAndUpdate() does not return a promise if you pass it a callback. Instead, it executes and puts the result in the callback.
In addition, doing a throw from a callback like this just throws into the database (the code that called the callback) and won't do you any good at all. To have a throw make a rejected promise, you need to either be throwing from the top level of an async function or be throwing from inside a .then() or .catch() handler or inside a promise executor function. That's where throw makes a promise rejected.
The key here is that you want to use the promise interface to your database, not the callback interface. If you don't pass a callback, then it returns a query which you can use .exec() on to get a promise which you can then use with await.
In addition, you weren't building an error object that would have a .code property set to 404. That isn't a property that is supported by the Error object constructor, so if you want that property, you have to set it manually.
I'd suggest this:
async setupTap(tap) {
const model = this.connection.model('Tap', TapSchema);
let result = await model.findOneAndUpdate({ id: tap.id }, tap).exec();
if (!result) {
let err = new Error('Tap doesn\'t exists');
err.code = 404;
throw err;
}
return result;
}
Or, with only one async operation here, there's really not much benefit to using await. You could just do this:
setupTap(tap) {
const model = this.connection.model('Tap', TapSchema);
return model.findOneAndUpdate({ id: tap.id }, tap).exec().then(result => {
if (!result) {
let err = new Error('Tap doesn\'t exists');
err.code = 404;
throw err;
}
return result;
});
}

The function findOneAndUpdate returns a promise so there should be no need for the callback. If a callback is needed and you can't update to a newer version then maybe wrap calls in a promise (under To use a callback api as promise you can do:)
Then you want to set code on error, you can't do that with the constructor.
async setupTap(tap) {
const model = this.connection.model('Tap', TapSchema);
const result = await model.findOneAndUpdate({ id: tap.id }, tap);
if (!result) {
const e = new Error('Tap doesn\'t exists');
e.code = 404;
throw(e);
}
return result;
}
async setupTapHandler(request, h) {
const tapData = {
id: request.params.id,
clientId: request.payload.clientId,
beerId: request.payload.beerId,
kegId: request.payload.kegId,
};
try {
await this.kegeratorApi.setupTap(tapData);
} catch (e) {
if (e.code === 404) return h.response().code(404);
}
return h.response().code(204);
}

Async function always return undefined

im using nodejs 8. I've replaced promise structure code to use async and await.
I have an issue when I need to return an object but await sentence resolve undefined.
This is my controller method:
request.create = async (id, params) => {
try {
let request = await new Request(Object.assign(params, { property : id })).save()
if ('_id' in request) {
Property.findById(id).then( async (property) => {
property.requests.push(request._id)
await property.save()
let response = {
status: 200,
message: lang.__('general.success.created','Request')
}
return Promise.resolve(response)
})
}
}
catch (err) {
let response = {
status: 400,
message: lang.__('general.error.fatalError')
}
return Promise.reject(response)
}
}
In http request function:
exports.create = async (req, res) => {
try {
let response = await Request.create(req.params.id, req.body)
console.log(response)
res.send(response)
}
catch (err) {
res.status(err.status).send(err)
}
}
I tried returning Promise.resolve(response) and Promise.reject(response) with then and catch in the middleware function and is occurring the same.
What's wrong?
Thanks a lot, cheers

You don't necessarily need to interact with the promises at all inside an async function. Inside an async function, the regular throw syntax is the same as return Promise.reject() because an async function always returns a Promise. Another thing I noticed with your code is that you're rejecting promises inside a HTTP handler, which will definitely lead to unexpected behavior later on. You should instead handle all errors directly in the handler and act on them accordingly, instead of returning/throwing them.
Your code could be rewritten like so:
request.create = async (id, params) => {
let request = await new Request(Object.assign(params, { property : id })).save()
if ('_id' in request) {
let property = await Property.findById(id)
property.requests.push(request._id)
await property.save()
}
}
And your http handler:
exports.create = async (req, res) => {
try {
await Request.create(req.params.id, req.body)
res.send({
status: 200,
message: lang.__('general.success.created','Request')
})
} catch (err) {
switch (err.constructor) {
case DatabaseConnectionError: // Not connected to database
return res.sendStatus(500) // Internal server error
case UnauthorizedError:
return res.sendStatus(401) // Unauthorized
case default:
return res.status(400).send(err) // Generic error
}
}
}
Error classes:
class DatabaseConnectionError extends Error {}
class UnauthorizedError extends Error {}
Because you have that try/catch block inside your http handler method, anything that throws or rejects inside the Request.create method will be caught there. See https://repl.it/LtLo/3 for a more concise example of how errors thrown from async function or Promises doesn't need to be caught directly where they are first called from.