We Keep Coding

node.js does not recognise the url in the unfluff module

Any help will be appreciated.
I need to extract data from websites and found that node-unfluff does the job (see https://github.com/ageitgey/node-unfluff). There is two ways to call this module.
First, from command line which works!
Second, from node js which doesn't work.
extractor = require('unfluff');
data = extractor('test.html');
console.log(data);
Output : {"title":"","lang":null,"tags":[],"image":null,"videos":[],"text":""}
The data returns an empty json object. It appears like it cannot read the test.html.
It seems like it doesn't recognise test.html. The example says, "my html data", is there a way to get html data ? Thanks.

From the docs of unfluff:
extractor(html, language)
html: The html you want to parse
language (optional): The document's two-letter language code. This
will be auto-detected as best as possible, but there might be cases
where you want to override it.
You are passing a filename, and it expects the actual HTML of the file to be passed in.
If you are doing this in a scripting context, I'd recommend doing
data = extractor(fs.readFileSync('test.html'));
however if you are doing this in the context of a server or some time when blocking will be an issue, you should do:
fs.readFile('test.html', function(err, html){
var data = extractor(html);
console.log(data);
));

Ext Js proxy pass parameter

I want to pass a parameter to my Store proxy to retrieve the right data from the server. I need to pass the parameter without the name prefix and just the value.
Instead of this kind of url :
myAppUrl/collections/units?collectionId=54
which can be done like this:
myStore.getProxy().extraParams.collectionId = 54;
I want to have a call like this:
myAppUrl/collections/54/units
My web service is adapted for both calls I just need the correct client code to pass the parameter.
Please help and advise.

An old question, but I write for anyone with this problem. I implemented the idea of #Saki in this package (for ExtJS 6) because of my own needs:
https://bitbucket.org/alfonsonishikawa/extjspackages/wiki/Server%20URL%20Placeholders
The idea is being able to use an URL like:
proxy: {
type: 'rest',
url: 'myAppUrl/collections/${collectionId}/units',
appendId: false
}
With that package, you just have to configure your proxy like above and call #load() with params:
store.load({
params: {
collectionId: 54
}
});
(getProxy().extraParams can be used as default value)
This is the source code as example that you asked #Saki about.

It looks almost like REST request but not exactly as REST places indexes at the end of url. You could solve it by implementing a custom buildUrl of Ajax or Rest proxy. In any case, see how is this method implemented in Rest proxy.

you can set your url dynamically and then call load method of store using below code.
store.getProxy().setUrl('your new url');
store.load();
but if you gonna use this method then you have to set correct url every time other-vice may be you will get wrong data.

how to send variable from javascript to controller

I'm working with symfony2 and I need to send data from javascript function to the controller.
This works when there is no data to send in the url
document.location.href="{{path("modifMalade")}}"
But I don't know how to do to put parameter on it?

All you need is just to read the docs:
http://symfony.com/doc/current/reference/twig_reference.html#path
In your case, it could look like this:
document.location.href="{{ path("modifMalade", {'param1': 'value1'})}}"

Use Separate js File And use Url Helpers in it with ASP.NEt MVC 3 and Razor View Engine

I ask a similar question here and Darin Dimitrov answer that we can't use Url helper like $.ajax({ url: '#Url.Action("Index")', . . . in separate js file so what is your suggestion to use Url helper in view page and pass it to javascript, I don't want to use hard code url, I need to find it with Url helper.?

Use a hidden field to store your url, then use javascript to read the hidden field, then use that in your code. That way you can keep the JS file separate to the view. Something like this:
//In Your View
#Html.Hidden("MyURL", Url.Action("Index"))
//In Your JS
var myUrl = $("#MyURL").val();
$.ajax({ url: myUrl , . . .

The easiest way is just to create a global variable called something and just reference to it in your external JS
var baseURL = '#Url.Action("Index")';
Inside your external JS
$.ajax({ url: baseURL + "Action"

You can use RazorJS for that purpose. It allows writing Razor-Style C# or VB.NET inside your JavaScript files. There is a short description available here.

There is no need to have hidden field, even this works too in the external .js file.
var myUrl = /ControllerName/ActionName;
$.ajax({ url: myUrl , . .

Take a look at Generating External JavaScript Files Using Partial Razor Views. In this blog post, I describe how you can make use of regular Razor views and a custom action filter to render external JavaScript files that can have Razor code in them.

I used a similar approach to raklos, but was looking to get the root directory path in all places, so I went with the code below.
#Html.Hidden("AppUrl", Url.Content("~"))

symfony 2 equivalent for url_for() function in symfony 1

In Symfony 1 we can access an action in template page as for example url_for('modulename/actionname') without writing anything in routing.yml.
how is this possible in Symfony2?,that is if i have to access more than one action in a twig without specifying in routing.this is useful while using ajax.
Thanks in advance

If I understand your question correctly, you're asking how you can generate a url by passing a module name and action name, instead of a route name. Is that right?
I don't think this is possible in Symfony2. If you take a look at the generate method in Symfony\Component\Routing\Generator\UrlGenerator you'll see that it expects a route's name as the first parameter. Also, Symfony2 doesn't natively support the generic routes that symfony 1 does (shown below for reference).
default_index:
url: /:module
param: { action: index }
default:
url: /:module/:action/*
Without these generic routes, you can't simply access /myModule/myAction without actually defining a route for it. And don't forget that Symfony2 now uses bundles, which would complicate this further.
So for whatever actions you want to access, you'll need to write routes for them.
In order to actually generate the URLs...
- From a controller: $this->generateUrl($routeName);
- From a PHP template: $view['router']->generate($routeName);
- From a Twig template: {{ path('_routeName') }} or {{ url('_routeName') }} for an absolute URL

Additionally to Arms' words, here are few examples (with parameters):
Let's say our routing is:
#routing.yml
acme_demo_page:
path: /{page}.{_format}
defaults:
_controller: AcmeDemoBundle:Page:index
We'll generate the URL for this routing, as follows:
From any controller's action:
$url = $view['router']->generate("acme_demo_page", array(
"page" => "main",
"_format" => "html",
));
From any PHP template:
$url = $this->generateUrl("acme_demo_page", array(
"page" => "main",
"_format" => "html",
));
From any Twig template:
Home
Abs Home
Hope it helps.
Cheers.