We want to develop a chrome sidebar extension, and I got to know that sidebar support will not be available in the chrome future versions.Please refer here.
So is it advisable to develop sidebar extension?
Well, this API is not even listed as experimental in the current documentation.
It may be already removed, might change at any time, and has no timeline for becoming released.
The reply that says it's going away is from a Google Engineer, so it's highly probable that it will never reach Stable.
Therefore, it makes no sense to try and develop for that.
Related
I have an ASP.NET MVC application that makes pretty heavy use of javascript and JQuery for both administrative functions as well as customer-facing functions. Recently I reorganized the administrative screens to be able to more cleanly fit administrative controls for some new features.
I tested using IE and Chrome and found that there was a slight, but acceptable hang in one of the busier pages. However, the main person who uses the admin pages uses Firefox and kept reporting an unacceptable hang. I finally checked it out and found that what hangs in Chrome and IE for 2-3 seconds hangs in Firefox for 10-12 seconds, which is no good.
Not knowing where to turn, I wound up installing Glimpse and got it configured and running just fine, but I'm still having trouble figuring out how to drill into it to find out what area of the page is causing trouble. All I can tell so far is that it is definitely something with how the client (Firefox) is rendering. To be clear, it happens on all browsers, but for some reason it is way more pronounced in Firefox.
Can someone please give me some pointers on how to get started on diagnosing the issue? I'm not married to the idea of using Glimpse, but it seems like a pretty decent tool from what I can tell.
Thanks for your help.
Based on what you're describing, the problem appears to be client side. With that said, Glimpse may not be as well-suited as using Firefox's own profiler.
SHIFT+F5 will bring up the web developer performance screen. From there, you can begin/end a performance analysis and gain more insight into what may be taking longer than expected.
It may also be worthwhile to look at the network tab and make sure assets are loading in a timely manner.
Keep in mind as well that add-ins could play into the latency. If the end-user has a setup that performs post-page processing (such as Greasemonkey scripts or (recalling an earlier add-in) a Skype plugin that used to transform phone numbers on the page to direct-dial links), that would also play a part in the performance. A good way to rule these out is to hold down SHIFT while starting up Firefox (effectively running it in Safe Mode), which would determine if it's Firefox itself or an add-in that's to blame.
I was wondering if anyone could provide me with some links to some tutorials or explain (with some example code), how I would go about making a simple google chrome extension (or in any programming language or browser if that is impossible), how I would make an extension that can visit a specific site, fill a login form on that site, click some links and then do the same sort of thing on the linked to site.
Thanks
Personally, I would not use a chrome extension, but maybe a perl script. There is an extension called WWW::Mechanize that is designed exactly to do this kind of stuff.
You can find plenty of tutorials and examples, just google it.
Edit in 2021: the above recommendation has become a bit outdated since 2013. For a more up-to-date take, I'd still recommend a scriptable headless browser instead of an extension for most automation tasks, but probably not WWW:Mechanize. There are good lists of options, such as this one.
Recently, we found that Firefox had made a change towards plugins, such that the user will be temporarily blocked from running them if they are not using the latest version. Our site requires Flash to play sound and interact with the user's webcam/microphone, so we need to do whatever we can to ensure they're not getting these warnings.
One way suggested to me is to create a small Flash control, and wait for it to tell Javascript that it's been initialized. If not (and the user is using Firefox) then they are taken to a page prompting them to update. This may work, but I worry about its reliability, and about running it on every page in our site.
Alternatively, I've been researching a way to use Javascript to detect versions, without making a Flash control. I not only need the user's current version of Flash, but also the version Firefox will expect - and I haven't found an autonomous way of doing so. I don't want an admin to have to change a small value each time Adobe releases a new version. Does anyone have any advice how I could find Flash's latest available version, or an alternate way to solve my problem?
I recommend you have a look at SWFOject and the Express Install option which should ease upgrading considerably.
I just noticed someone upvoting this question, so I thought that I would provide my eventual solution, which I think reduced the impact of a recent issue where Firefox blocked the most recent edition of Flash, pending Adobe's fix.
Basically, I went with a variation on the second paragraph in my question. It does not direct the user to a new page; instead, it opens a dialog over the current page that explains it's having issues communicating with Flash. (It does not specifically say "Your Flash is out of date" because this can also happen if the browser is hiding flash under a Yes/No user dialog). It also contains a small fake flash object, with the idea being that if the browser wants to display a security warning, accept prompt, etc., it can do it inside that space.
The dialog goes away on its own if said Flash control ends up making its callback to JavaScript. It also installs a variable under sessionStorage so we don't bother checking for it again (Flash takes enough time on some computers that you might see the dialog for a split second).
What I want to do is that when the user clicks a button I will add to firefox (or clicks an option I will add under tools, etc), a new tab should be opened, and in the tab will essentially be an offline website that is written in HTML/CSS/JS and will be part of the addon.
How can I do this? It does not matter to me if I require a very new version of firefox to accomplish this.
Making your first firefox addon can be quite challenging, at first. But once you make one, things get much better. Here are some tools to help you get started:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/tools/builder
I suggest you start with this and check all the features. Once you download the skeleton, look over ff-overlay.xul in the /chrome/content folder. It should be straightforward if you know XUL/Javascript.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Setting_up_extension_development_environment
This link helps you set up Firefox for easy addon testing and debugging.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Code_snippets/Tabbed_browser
The Mozilla Developer Network is incredibly useful. For example, that link takes you to a page that explains everything about switching tabs.
https://builder.addons.mozilla.org/
Addon playground.
Remember, Google's your friend! Good luck!
I like to keep javascript debugging enabled in my browser so when I'm developing my own code I can instantly see when I've made an error.
Of course this means I see errors on apple.com, microsoft.com, stackoverflow.com, cnn.com, facebook.com. Its quite fun sometimes to see just how much awful code there is out there being run by major sites but sometimes it gets really annoyed.
I've wondered for YEARS how to change this but never really got around to it. Its particularly annoying today and I'd really like to know of any solutions.
The only solution I have is : use a different browser for everyday browsing.
I'm hopin theres some quick and easy plugin someone can direct me to where I can toggle it on and off based upon the domain i'm on.
Edit: I generally use IE7 for everyday browsing
Firebug lets you enable/disable debugging for different domains.
Script Debugging in IE7 is controlled by a registry key. (An addon could probably toggle it. I just don't know of any.)
So, how I handle this is to write a registry script to turn it on or off. Then, I put a link to those scripts on my windows quick-launch bar and change their icons to be more appropriate. Then, I can just click one of the links to turn on or off IE script debugging.
Turn Off:
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main]
"Disable Script Debugger"="yes"
"DisableScriptDebuggerIE"="yes"
Turn ON:
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main]
"Disable Script Debugger"="no"
"DisableScriptDebuggerIE"="no"
Firefox lets you use different profiles. Each profile can have separate preferences, themes and plugins. Start firefox on Windows this way: firefox.exe -ProfileManager to create or manage profiles.
I use Firefox and Webkit for web debugging and Safari for regular web browsing, however. Firefox is just better for web development, and I prefer Safari overall.
I keep those annoying popups on for Internet Explorer, and you're right. It's amazing how few developers ever bother testing their code in IE. As a web developer, it's sorta your duty, right? Seeing as how it still accounts for like 60% of traffic to most sites.
Anyway, in answer to your question, I simply switched to Chrome for everyday browsing, and only use IE for testing and developing.
You have two options.
Change and use a browser that allows you to have site specific configuration (check out Firefox with Firebug), or
Use different browsers for developing and everyday use.
CompanionJS doesn't let you toggle debugging on a domain basis, but makes the error messages less obtrusive for casual surfing, and makes script debugging in general more user friendly.
Chrome doesnt bug you unless you first open the javascript debugger window
If you want to test and debug JavaScript, Firefox and Firebug are unrivalled in terms of features and ease of use. Chrome is not as powerful as Firebug, no matter what anyone else tells you.