I couldn't find an example here what I'm really looking for.
I'd like to multiply all array elements, so if an array contains [1,2,3] the sum would be 123=6;
So far I've got this code, but it returns undefined.
function multiply (array) {
var sum=1;
for (var i=0; i<array.length; i++) {
sum = sum * array[i];
}
return sum;
}
console.log(multiply[1,2,3]);
Could anyone please explain, what am I missing here?
The cause is already known. Here's an alternative - using Array.reduce for your method:
console.log( [1, 2, 3].reduce( (a, b) => a * b ) );
console.log( Array.from( {length: 20} )
.map( (v, i) => i + 1 )
.reduce( (a,b) => a * b, 1 )
.toLocaleString());
// for empty arrays, use some initial value
const arr = [];
if (arr.reduce( (a, b) => a * b, -1 ) === -1) {
console.error(`The given array ${arr} is empty`);
}
See also
The alternative way to use Array.reduce should have the initial value set to 1 or else our function will return 0 no matter what.
[1, 2, 3].reduce((a, b)=> a*b, 1)
per https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/reduce
You need to have () when you call the function.
Like multiply([1,2,3])
Demo here
You're not calling multiply as a function:
multiply([1,2,3]);
The reduce() method executes a provided function for each value of the array and reduces the array to a single value
const arr = [1,2,3];
const sum = arr.reduce((prevValue,curValue) => {
return prevValue * curValue
},1);
console.log(sum);
prevValue is the initial value and it's equal 1 in this example
curValue is the value of the current element in array
This is the simplest way to do any arithmetic operation on array
myMathArray = [1,2,3,4,5]
let myValue = myMathArray.reduce((a,b)=> a*b)
console.log(myValue)
If you want to multiply some consecutive numbers like 1,2,3 then, then apply this code and enter the number in the console (arr)
let array = [];
function factorisation(arr) {
for (let j = arr; j > 0; j--) {
array.push(j);
}
return multiply();
}
function multiply() {
var sum = 1;
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
sum = sum * array[i];
}
return sum;
}
console.log(factorisation(5));
//5*4*3*2*1 = 120
Using Lodash >=4.7:
_.reduce(array, _.multiply)
or, using all three arguments:
_.reduce(array, _.multiply, 1)
If you want to use recursion
const productOfArray = (arr) => {
if (arr.length === 0) {
return 1;
}
return arr[0] * productOfArray(arr.slice(1));
}
console.log(productOfArray([1,2,3,10])); // 60
This can be simplified using recursion...
function productOfArray(arr) {
let sum = 1;
function sumHelper(nums) {
if(nums.length === 0)
return 0;
sum = sum * nums[nums.length-1];
nums.length--;
sumHelper(nums);
}
sumHelper(arr);
return sum;
}
console.log(productOfArray([1,2,3]));
Here is an example of Multiply all array elements:
const arr = [1,2,3,2];
use reduce();
const multiply = arr.reduce((preValue,nextValue)=>preValue*nextValue);
console.log(multiply); //12
Related
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => arr.reduce((total)=>(num==0 ? total : total+num), 0)
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
Please check how can I make it work. Did some mistake but don't know what exactly. Output is a function instead of a result.
This is awkward to do in .reduce because it goes through the entire array. If we do a naive implementation you can see the problem:
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => arr.reduce((total, x)=>(num==x ? total : total+x), 0)
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
We now make the check correctly - num==x will return true when x is zero (the value of num). However, the result is wrong because this only returns true once but any other iteration it's still true. And here is the same thing with more logging that describes each step of the process:
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => arr.reduce((total, x)=> {
const boolCheck = num==x;
const result = boolCheck ? total : total+x;
console.log(
`total: ${total}
num: ${num}
x: ${x}
boolCheck: ${boolCheck}
result: ${result}`);
return result;
}, 0)
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
So, you need to add some flag that persists between iterations, so it doesn't get lost.
One option is to have an external flag that you change within the reduce callback:
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => {
let finished = false;
return arr.reduce((total, x) => {
if(x === num)
finished = true;
return finished ? total : total+x;
}, 0)
}
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
Alternatively, you can have that flag internal to the reduce callback and pass it around between calls. It works the same way in the end but makes the callback function pure. At the cost of some unorthodox construct:
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => {
return arr.reduce(({total, finished}, x) => {
if(x === num)
finished = true;
total = finished ? total : total+x;
return {total, finished};
}, {total: 0, finished: false})
.total
}
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
If you want to use reduce but you're OK with using other methods, then you can use Array#indexOf to find the first instance of a value and Array#slice the array that contains any value up to the target value:
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => {
const endIndex = arr.indexOf(num);
return arr.slice(0, endIndex)
.reduce((total, x)=> total+x, 0)
}
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
Or in as one chained expression:
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => arr
.slice(0, arr.indexOf(num))
.reduce((total, x)=> total+x, 0);
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
Other libraries may have a takeUntil or takeWhile operation which is even closer to what you want - it gets you an array from the beginning up to a given value or condition. You can then reduce the result of that.
Here is an example of this using Lodash#takeWhile
By using chaining here, Lodash will do lazy evaluation, so it will only go through the array once, instead of scanning once to find the end index and going through the array again to sum it.
const arr = [5,6,0,7,8];
const sum = (arr,num) => _(arr)
.takeWhile(x => x !== num)
.reduce((total, x)=>total+x, 0)
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash#4.17.15/lodash.min.js"></script>
As a note, if you are using Lodash, then you may as well use _.sum(). I didn't above just to illustrate how a generic takeUntil/takeWhile looks.
const arr = [5, 6, 0, 7, 8];
const sum = (arr, num) => _(arr)
.takeWhile(x => x !== num)
.sum()
console.log(sum(arr, 0))
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash#4.17.15/lodash.min.js"></script>
Since you need to stop summing values part way through the array, this might be most simply implemented using a for loop:
const arr = [5, 6, 0, 7, 8];
const num = 0;
let sum = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] == num) break;
sum += arr[i];
}
console.log(sum);
If you want to use reduce, you need to keep a flag that says whether you have seen the num value so you can stop adding values from the array:
const arr = [5, 6, 0, 7, 8];
const sum = (arr, num) => {
let seen = false;
return arr.reduce((c, v) => {
if (seen || v == num) {
seen = true;
return c;
}
return c + v;
}, 0);
}
console.log(sum(arr, 0));
console.log(sum(arr, 8));
call it as follows:
console.log(sum(arr, 0)());
You need parenthesis to execute the function ()
sum(arr, 0)
Without parenthesis you store a reference to the function in the variable
I am completing the hackerrank's 10 days of javascript challenge. The question:
write a function to take an array as an argument and then return the second largest element in the array.
I have written the code but my code is returning the largest element and not the second largest as asked.
function getSecondLargest(nums) {
// Complete the function
var largest=nums[0];
for(let i=1;i<nums.length;++i)
{
if(nums[i]>largest)
largest=nums[i];
}
var large=nums[0];
for(let j=1;j<nums.length;++j)
{
if(large<nums[j]&&large<largest)
large=nums[j];
}
return large;
}
When input array nums={2,3,6,6,5} the result is coming 6 while expected output is 5. Please help and point out the errors in the function code below.
should not initialize large with first value var large=nums[0]; because it may appear the biggest value and won't work
should use nums[j]<largest instead of large<largest as mentioned above
I think don't need second loop as all checks can be done in first loop, and you can assign prev largest to large whenever you change it:
function getSecondLargest(nums) {
var largest = nums[0];
var large;
for (let i = 1; i < nums.length; ++i) {
if (nums[i] > largest) {
large = largest;
largest = nums[i];
} else if (nums[i] > large || typeof large === 'undefined') {
large = nums[i]
}
}
return large;
}
console.log(getSecondLargest([5,1-2,3]))
console.log(getSecondLargest([-5,1,-2,3]))
GET SECOND LARGEST
first, I create new array with unique values.
let arr = [...new Set(nums)];
second, sort value using built-in function .sort().
note : by default .sort() always sorts asciibetically, but for some testcase, it doesn't work. So, I put (a, b) => { return a - b } to make sure it will work properly.
arr = arr.sort((a, b) => { return a -b });
third, get the value from arr
let result = arr[arr.length - 2] || arr[0];
finally, return the result
return result
function getSecondLargest(nums) {
let arr = [...new Set(nums)];
//Javascript's array member method .sort( always sorts asciibetically.
arr = arr.sort((a, b) => { return a - b });
let result = arr[arr.length - 2] || arr[0];
return result
}
Just one minor change:
Use nums[j]<largest instead of large<largest in the second for loop
function getSecondLargest(nums) {
// Complete the function
var largest=nums[0];
for(let i=1;i<nums.length;++i)
{
if(nums[i]>largest)
largest=nums[i];
}
var large;
//To ensure that the selected number is not the largest
for(let j=0;j<nums.length;++j)
{
if (nums[j] !== largest){
large = nums[j];
break;
}
}
for(let j=1;j<nums.length;++j)
{
if(large<nums[j]&&nums[j]!=largest)
large=nums[j];
else
console.log(large)
}
return large;
}
var secondLargest = getSecondLargest([6,3,6,6,5]);
console.log("Second largest number", secondLargest);
If you want to avoid using library functions like #ifaruki suggests, this line
if(large<nums[j]&&large<largest)
should read
if (large<nums[j] && nums[j] < largest)
Sorting and picking the second or second-to-last value fails when there are duplicates of the highest value in the input array.
Another easiest logic is to remove duplicates from the array and sort.
let givenArray = [2, 3, 6, 6, 5];
let uniqueArray = [...new Set(givenArray)];
console.log("The second largets element is", uniqueArray.sort()[uniqueArray.length - 2]);
I know you had your question answered, just thought I would provide my solution for any future users looking into this.
You can use reduce to go through the array while remembering the two largest numbers so far.
You just make a simple reduction function:
function twoMax(two_max, candidate)
{
if (candidate > two_max[0]) return [candidate,two_max[0]];
else if (candidate > two_max[1]) return [two_max[0],candidate];
else return two_max;
}
And then you use it for example like this:
let my_array = [0,1,5,7,0,8,12];
let two_largest = my_array.reduce(twoMax,[-Infinity,-Infinity]);
let second_largest = two_largest[1];
This solution doesn't require sorting and goes through the array only once.
If you want to avoid using **sort method. I think here's the easiest logic to do that, which will also work in arrays where there's duplicates of largest integer exists.
function getSecondLargest(arr) {
const largest = Math.max.apply(null, arr);
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (largest === arr[i]) {
arr[i] = -Infinity;
}
}
return Math.max.apply(null, arr);
}
console.log(getSecondLargest([5, 7, 11, 11, 11])); //7
This code returns only returns the order of the sums of the numeric value, how do I return the array element in a list arranged by largest sum on top?
For instance, the result should be:
"1234-2722-2343-2842"
"1234-2722-2343-2345"
"1234-2322-2343-2342"
Code:
var addSum = function(ccNum) {
var sum = 0;
for (var i=0; i<ccNum.length; i++ ) {
var eachLetter = ccNum.charAt(i);
if (!isNaN(eachLetter)) {
sum += +eachLetter;
}
}
return sum;
};
var ccNums = ["1234-2322-2343-2342","1234-2722-2343-2345", "1234-2722-2343-2842"];
var checkNums = [];
for (var i=0; i<ccNums.length; i++) {
var ccNum = ccNums[i];
var sum = addSum(ccNum);
console.log("The checksum of CC number:"+ccNum+" is "+sum);
checkNums.push(sum);
}
checkNums.sort(function(a,b) {
return b-a;
});
console.log(checkNums);
The solution using String.replace, String.split, Array.map, Array.filter and Array.reduce:
var ccNums = ["1234-2322-2343-2342","1234-2722-2343-2345", "1234-2722-2343-2842"],
getSum = function(num){
return num.replace("-", "").split("").map(Number).filter(Boolean).reduce(function(prev, next){
return prev + next;
});
};
ccNums.sort(function (a, b) {
return getSum(b) - getSum(a);
});
console.log(ccNums);
The output:
["1234-2722-2343-2842", "1234-2722-2343-2345", "1234-2322-2343-2342"]
I suggest use Sorting with map, because it uses only one iteration for the sum of a string and uses it until the sorts end. Then it rebuilds a new array with the sorted items.
var ccNums = ["1234-2322-2343-2342", "1234-2722-2343-2345", "1234-2722-2343-2842"];
// temporary array holds objects with position and sort-value
var mapped = ccNums.map(function (el, i) {
return {
index: i,
value: el.split('').reduce(function (r, a) { return r + (+a || 0); }, 0)
};
});
// sorting the mapped array containing the reduced values
mapped.sort(function (a, b) {
return b.value - a.value;
});
// container for the resulting order
var result = mapped.map(function (el) {
return ccNums[el.index];
});
console.log(result);
Use Array#sort with help of String#split and Array#reduce methods
var ccNums = ["1234-2322-2343-2342", "1234-2722-2343-2345", "1234-2722-2343-2842"];
// function to get sum of numbers in string
function sum(str) {
// split string
return str.split('-')
// iterate and get sum
.reduce(function(a, b) {
// parse string to convert to number
return a + Number(b); // in case string contains no-digit char that for avoiding NaN use "return a + ( parseInt(b, 10) || 0 )
}, 0); //set initial value to avoid 2 parsing
}
// call sort function
ccNums.sort(function(a, b) {
// find out sum and compare based on that
return sum(b) - sum(a);
});
console.log(ccNums)
Or much better way would be, store the sum in an object and refer in sort function which helps avoid calling sum function multiple times.
var ccNums = ["1234-2322-2343-2342", "1234-2722-2343-2345", "1234-2722-2343-2842"];
// function to get sum of numbers in string
function sum(str) {
// split string
return str.split('-')
// iterate and get sum
.reduce(function(a, b) {
// parse string to convert to number
return a + Number(b);
}, 0); //set initial value to avoid 2 parsing
}
var sumArr = {};
// create object for referncing sum,
// which helps to avoid calling sum function
// multiple tyms with same string
ccNums.forEach(function(v) {
sumArr[v] = sum(v);
});
// call sort function
ccNums.sort(function(a, b) {
// find out sum and compare based on that
return sumArr[b] - sumArr[a];
});
console.log(ccNums)
I can sum each value in the array but I can't figure out how to get the sum of each number multiplied by its position in the array.
Create a variable that stores product of the index and array element. Then add that to array element and store it to sum.
var myProd=1;
var mySum=0;
for(var i = 0 ; i<myArray.length() ; i++)
{
myProd = (i+1)*myArray[i];
mySum+=(myArray[i]+myProd);
}
You can use the reduce method for arrays: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/Reduce
var myArray = [1,2,3,4];
var result = myArray.reduce(function(prev, curr, index) {
return prev + (curr * index);
}, 0);
console.log(result);
Which is effectively the same as (1*0 + 2*1 + 3*2 + 4*3)
Define a function to sum up the values in an array:
function sum(array) { return array.reduce(function(a, b) { return a + b; }); }
Now create an array of each value multiplied by its position, then apply sum to it:
sum(myArray.map(function(elt, idx) { return elt * idx; }))
In ES6, you can write this more compactly:
function sum(array) { return array.reduce((a, b) => a + b); }
sum(myArray.map((elt, idx) => elt * idx));
I have 2 array:
var array1 = [[5,10],[6,10],[7,10],[8,10],[9,10]];
var array2 = [[1,10],[2,10],[3,10],[4,10],[5,40],[6,40]];
Want to get 1 merged array with the sum of corresponding keys;
var array1 = [[1,10],[2,10],[3,10],[4,10],[5,50],[6,50],[7,10],[8,10],[9,10]];
Both arrays have unique keys, but the corresponding keys needs to be summed.
I tried loops, concat, etc but can't get the result i need.
anybody done this before?
You can use .reduce() to pass along an object that tracks the found sets, and does the addition.
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/aUXLV/
var array1 = [[5,10],[6,10],[7,10],[8,10],[9,10]];
var array2 = [[1,10],[2,10],[3,10],[4,10],[5,40],[6,40]];
var result =
array1.concat(array2)
.reduce(function(ob, ar) {
if (!(ar[0] in ob.nums)) {
ob.nums[ar[0]] = ar
ob.result.push(ar)
} else
ob.nums[ar[0]][1] += ar[1]
return ob
}, {nums:{}, result:[]}).result
If you need the result to be sorted, then add this to the end:
.sort(function(a,b) {
return a[0] - b[0];
})
This is one way to do it:
var sums = {}; // will keep a map of number => sum
// for each input array (insert as many as you like)
[array1, array2].forEach(function(array) {
//for each pair in that array
array.forEach(function(pair) {
// increase the appropriate sum
sums[pair[0]] = pair[1] + (sums[pair[0]] || 0);
});
});
// now transform the object sums back into an array of pairs
var results = [];
for(var key in sums) {
results.push([key, sums[key]]);
}
See it in action.
a short routine can be coded using [].map()
var array1 = [[5,10],[6,10],[7,10],[8,10],[9,10]];
var array2 = [[1,10],[2,10],[3,10],[4,10],[5,40],[6,40]];
array1=array2.concat(array1).map(function(a){
var v=this[a[0]]=this[a[0]]||[a[0]];
v[1]=(v[1]||0)+a[1];
return this;
},[])[0].slice(1);
alert(JSON.stringify(array1));
//shows: [[1,10],[2,10],[3,10],[4,10],[5,50],[6,50],[7,10],[8,10],[9,10]]
i like how it's just 3 line of code, doesn't need any internal function calls like push() or sort() or even an if() statement.
Try this:
var array1 = [[5,10],[6,10],[7,10],[8,10],[9,10]];
var array2 = [[1,10],[2,10],[3,10],[4,10],[5,40],[6,40]];
var res = [];
someReasonableName(array1, res);
someReasonableName(array2, res);
function someReasonableName(arr, res) {
var arrLen = arr.length
, i = 0
;
for(i; i < arrLen; i++) {
var ar = arr[i]
, index = ar[0]
, value = ar[1]
;
if(!res[index]) {
res[index] = [index, 0];
}
res[index][1] += value;
}
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(res, null, 2));
So, the result may have holes. Just like 0th index. Use the below function if you want to ensure there are no holes.
function compact(arr) {
var i = 0
, arrLen = arr.length
, res = []
;
for(i; i < arrLen; i++) {
var v = arr[i]
;
if(v) {
res[res.length] = v;
}
}
return res;
}
So, you can do:
var holesRemoved = compact(res);
And finally if you don't want the 0th elem of res. Do res.shift();
Disclaimer: I am not good with giving reasonable names.
The simple solution is like this.
function sumArrays(...arrays) {
const n = arrays.reduce((max, xs) => Math.max(max, xs.length), 0);
const result = Array.from({ length: n });
return result.map((_, i) => arrays.map(xs => xs[i] || 0).reduce((sum, x) => sum + x, 0));
}
console.log(...sumArrays([0, 1, 2], [1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2])); // 2 5 5 4