I want to get element attribute value which belongs to other html page.
For example if I am in file a.html and want to get data like element attribute value from b.html in a.html
All I am trying to do in jquery.
Please suggest!
I read posts but I want like below-
something like->
[Code of a.html]
var result = get(b.html).getTag(img).getAttribute(src)//not getting exactly
$("#id").append(result)
any idea how can i achieve this?
first you will have to fetch the b.html and then you can find the attribute value e.g.
//if you dont want to display the data make the div hidden
^
$("#someDivID").load("b.html",function(data){
var value=$(data).find("#elementID").attr("attributeName");
});
With jQuery you can load only parts of remote pages. Basic syntax:
$('#result').load('ajax/test.html #container');
The second part of the string is a basic jQuery selector. See the jQuery documentation.
By default, selectors perform their searches within the DOM starting at the document root.
If you want to pass alternate context, you can pass to the optional second parameter to the $() function. For eg,
$('#name', window.parent.frames[0].document).attr();
Keep in mind that you can usually only make direct connections (like with $(..).load() to pages on the same domain you're currently on, or to domains that do not have CORS restrictions. (The vast majority of sites have CORS restrictions). If you want to load the content from a cross-domain page that has CORS restrictions, you'll have to make make the request through your server, and have your server make the request to the other site, then respond to your front-end script with the response.
As for this question, if you want to achieve this result without jQuery, you can use DOMParser on the response text instead, to transform it into a document, and then you can use DOM methods on that document to retrieve the element, parse it as desired, and insert it (or data retrieved from it) onto the current page. For example:
fetch('b.html') // replace with the URL of the external page
.then(res => res.text())
.then((responseText) => {
const doc = new DOMParser().parseFromString(responseText, 'text/html');
const targetElementOnOtherPage = doc.querySelector('img');
const src = targetElementOnOtherPage.src;
document.querySelector('#id').insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', `<img src="${src}">`);
})
.catch((err) => {
// There was an error, handle it here
});
Related
I have this JSON file I generate in the server I want to make accessible on the client as the page is viewable. Basically what I want to achieve is:
I have the following tag declared in my html document:
<script id="test" type="application/json" src="http://myresources/stuf.json">
The file referred in its source has JSON data. As I've seen, data has been downloaded, just like it happens with the scripts.
Now, how do I access it in Javascript? I've tried accessing the script tag, with and without jQuery, using a multitude of methods to try to get my JSON data, but somehow this doesn't work. Getting its innerHTML would have worked had the json data been written inline in the script. Which it wasn't and isn't what I'm trying to achieve.
Remote JSON Request after page loads is also not an option, in case you want to suggest that.
You can't load JSON like that, sorry.
I know you're thinking "why I can't I just use src here? I've seen stuff like this...":
<script id="myJson" type="application/json">
{
name: 'Foo'
}
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function() {
var x = JSON.parse($('#myJson').html());
alert(x.name); //Foo
});
</script>
... well to put it simply, that was just the script tag being "abused" as a data holder. You can do that with all sorts of data. For example, a lot of templating engines leverage script tags to hold templates.
You have a short list of options to load your JSON from a remote file:
Use $.get('your.json') or some other such AJAX method.
Write a file that sets a global variable to your json. (seems hokey).
Pull it into an invisible iframe, then scrape the contents of that after it's loaded (I call this "1997 mode")
Consult a voodoo priest.
Final point:
Remote JSON Request after page loads is also not an option, in case you want to suggest that.
... that doesn't make sense. The difference between an AJAX request and a request sent by the browser while processing your <script src=""> is essentially nothing. They'll both be doing a GET on the resource. HTTP doesn't care if it's done because of a script tag or an AJAX call, and neither will your server.
Another solution would be to make use of a server-side scripting language and to simply include json-data inline. Here's an example that uses PHP:
<script id="data" type="application/json"><?php include('stuff.json'); ?></script>
<script>
var jsonData = JSON.parse(document.getElementById('data').textContent)
</script>
The above example uses an extra script tag with type application/json. An even simpler solution is to include the JSON directly into the JavaScript:
<script>var jsonData = <?php include('stuff.json');?>;</script>
The advantage of the solution with the extra tag is that JavaScript code and JSON data are kept separated from each other.
It would appear this is not possible, or at least not supported.
From the HTML5 specification:
When used to include data blocks (as opposed to scripts), the data must be embedded inline, the format of the data must be given using the type attribute, the src attribute must not be specified, and the contents of the script element must conform to the requirements defined for the format used.
While it's not currently possible with the script tag, it is possible with an iframe if it's from the same domain.
<iframe
id="mySpecialId"
src="/my/link/to/some.json"
onload="(()=>{if(!window.jsonData){window.jsonData={}}try{window.jsonData[this.id]=JSON.parse(this.contentWindow.document.body.textContent.trim())}catch(e){console.warn(e)}this.remove();})();"
onerror="((err)=>console.warn(err))();"
style="display: none;"
></iframe>
To use the above, simply replace the id and src attribute with what you need. The id (which we'll assume in this situation is equal to mySpecialId) will be used to store the data in window.jsonData["mySpecialId"].
In other words, for every iframe that has an id and uses the onload script will have that data synchronously loaded into the window.jsonData object under the id specified.
I did this for fun and to show that it's "possible' but I do not recommend that it be used.
Here is an alternative that uses a callback instead.
<script>
function someCallback(data){
/** do something with data */
console.log(data);
}
function jsonOnLoad(callback){
const raw = this.contentWindow.document.body.textContent.trim();
try {
const data = JSON.parse(raw);
/** do something with data */
callback(data);
}catch(e){
console.warn(e.message);
}
this.remove();
}
</script>
<!-- I frame with src pointing to json file on server, onload we apply "this" to have the iframe context, display none as we don't want to show the iframe -->
<iframe src="your/link/to/some.json" onload="jsonOnLoad.apply(this, someCallback)" style="display: none;"></iframe>
Tested in chrome and should work in firefox. Unsure about IE or Safari.
I agree with Ben. You cannot load/import the simple JSON file.
But if you absolutely want to do that and have flexibility to update json file, you can
my-json.js
var myJSON = {
id: "12ws",
name: "smith"
}
index.html
<head>
<script src="my-json.js"></script>
</head>
<body onload="document.getElementById('json-holder').innerHTML = JSON.stringify(myJSON);">
<div id="json-holder"></div>
</body>
place something like this in your script file json-content.js
var mainjson = { your json data}
then call it from script tag
<script src="json-content.js"></script>
then you can use it in next script
<script>
console.log(mainjson)
</script>
Check this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7346598/1764509
$.getJSON("test.json", function(json) {
console.log(json); // this will show the info it in firebug console
});
If you need to load JSON from another domain:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSONP
However be aware of potential XSSI attacks:
https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20160414
If it's the same domain so just use Ajax.
Another alternative to use the exact json within javascript. As it is Javascript Object Notation you can just create your object directly with the json notation. If you store this in a .js file you can use the object in your application. This was a useful option for me when I had some static json data that I wanted to cache in a file separately from the rest of my app.
//Just hard code json directly within JS
//here I create an object CLC that represents the json!
$scope.CLC = {
"ContentLayouts": [
{
"ContentLayoutID": 1,
"ContentLayoutTitle": "Right",
"ContentLayoutImageUrl": "/Wasabi/Common/gfx/layout/right.png",
"ContentLayoutIndex": 0,
"IsDefault": true
},
{
"ContentLayoutID": 2,
"ContentLayoutTitle": "Bottom",
"ContentLayoutImageUrl": "/Wasabi/Common/gfx/layout/bottom.png",
"ContentLayoutIndex": 1,
"IsDefault": false
},
{
"ContentLayoutID": 3,
"ContentLayoutTitle": "Top",
"ContentLayoutImageUrl": "/Wasabi/Common/gfx/layout/top.png",
"ContentLayoutIndex": 2,
"IsDefault": false
}
]
};
While not being supported, there is an common alternative to get json into javascript. You state that "remote json request" it is not an option but you may want to consider it since it may be the best solution there is.
If the src attribute was supported, it would be doing a remote json request, so I don't see why you would want to avoid that while actively seeking to do it in an almost same fashion.
Solution :
<script>
async function loadJson(){
const res = await fetch('content.json');
const json = await res.json();
}
loadJson();
</script>
Advantages
allows caching, make sure your hosting/server sets that up properly
on chrome, after profiling using the performance tab, I noticed that it has the smallest CPU footprint compared to : inline JS, inline JSON, external JS.
I have a mobile application that opens an in-app browser that uses the URL to pass information to my server , like the deviceID.
For example the browser will open the web-page (jquery Mobile) : www.myserver.com/doWork.html#deviceID
On the server part using JavaScript inside the doWork.html file, I get the deviceID like this:
var userId = window.location.hash.substring(1);
Is it ok that i pass information using the hash # ? In jquery mobile the hash # is used to change between pages when someone uses the Multi-Page template structure . So i am afraid that maybe i should use something else , like a question mark (?) ?
Or its perfectly fine ?
NO. Stop using # for your data transfers. Let jQM do its thing. Don't disturb it. Use Query strings( adding ? in url). My advice is to stop using query strings (? tags) and # tags to send data to the next page. Handle it using localStorage. Its more secure compared to Query strings because the user wont see the URL change, so your sensitive data is hidden, at least to a little extent. localStorage is HTML5's API which is like a temporary storage set aside per domain. This data will persist until data is cleared in cache. Assuming you have an anchor tag which goes to dowork.html,
Go to Do work
Add an attribute for device ID in the tag itself, like this :
Go to Do work
You'd be doing this dynamically you might also use it the same way. You get the gist right?
A click event for this would look like this :
$(document).on("click", "a", function(e) //use a class or ID for this instead of just "a"
//prevent default
e.preventDefault();
//get device id from tag attribute
var deviceId = $(this).data("deviceid");
//set it in localStorage
localStorage["dId"] = deviceId;
//redirect
$.mobile.changePage(this.href);
});
Then, in the other page's pageinit (or any event), get the device id from storage and send the ajax call to the server.
//assuming #dowork is the id of a div with data-role="page"
$(document).on("pageinit", "#dowork", function() {
//get from storage
var deviceId = localStorage["dId"];
//make ajax call or server call with deviceId here
});
But, if you still want to use URL for this, look at this question. I've given a decent enough answer over there.
To pass variables to the server you should avoid using the # symbol because regardless of the framework you are using this symbol is used for other purposes, to pass info to the server in a GET request you should use the ? symbol, something like this should do it: www.myserver.com/doWork.html?deviceID=1233455
I have a page in which I am making an ajax call, which in turn gets forwarded to a jsp page and returns a table constructed in this jsp.
Till now this jsp used to return an html which the original page(table) used to append in a particular div. But now, we have a requirement that this jsp along with the table, returns some other info about the metadat of the query.
With this change, I would ideally not like to change the existing behaviour of some clients where they are just appending the html. But then, is there a way, in which the new pages which make this call can have both the html table(which can be appended) as well as metadata returned (which can be processed).
let me know if the question isn't clear enough.
Thanks!
The easiest and least destructive change would be to send it as response header.
In the servlet you can use HttpServletResponse#setHeader() to set a response header:
response.setHeader("X-Metadata", metadata);
// ...
(using a header name prefixed with X- is recommended for custom headers)
In JS you can use XMLHttpRequest#getResponseHeader() to get a response header:
var metadata = xhr.getResponseHeader('X-Metadata');
// ...
You can even set some JSON string in there so that (de)serialization is easy.
I am working on creating a RESTful API that supports cross-domain requests, JSON/JSONP support, and the main HTTP method (PUT/GET/POST/DELETE). Now while will be easy to accessing this API through server side code , it would nice to exposed it to javascript. From what I can tell, when doing a JSONP requests with jQuery, it only supports the GET method. Is there a way to do a JSONP request using POST/PUT/DELETE?
Ideally I would like a way to do this from within jQuery (through a plugin if the core does not support this), but I will take a plain javascript solution too. Any links to working code or how to code it would be helpful, thanks.
Actually - there is a way to support POST requests.
And there is no need in a PROXI server - just a small utility HTML page that is described bellow.
Here's how you get Effectively a POST cross-domain call, including attached files and multi-part and all :)
Here first are the steps in understanding the idea, after that - find an implementation sample.
How JSONP of jQuery is implemented, and why doesn't it support POST requests?
While the traditional JSONP is implemented by creating a script element and appending it into the DOM - what results inforcing the browser to fire an HTTP request to retrieve the source for the tag, and then execute it as JavaScript, the HTTP request that the browser fires is simple GET.
What is not limited to GET requests?
A FORM. Submit the FORM while specifing action the cross-domain server.
A FORM tag can be created completely using a script, populated with all fields using script, set all necessary attributes, injected into the DOM, and then submitted - all using script.
But how can we submit a FORM without refreshing the page?
We specify the target the form to an IFRAME in the same page.
An IFRAME can also be created, set, named and injected to the DOM using script.
But How can we hide this work from the user?
We'll contain both FORM and IFRAME in a hidden DIV using style="display:none"
(and here's the most complicated part of the technique, be patient)
But IFRAME from another domain cannot call a callback on it's top-level document. How to overcome that?
Indeed , if a response from FORM submit is a page from another domain, any script communication between the top-level page and the page in the IFRAME results in "access denied". So the server cannot callback using a script. What can the server can do? redirect. The server may redirect to any page - including pages in the same domain as the top-level document - pages that can invoke the callback for us.
How can a server redirect?
two ways:
Using client side script like <Script>location.href = 'some-url'</script>
Using HTTP-Header. See: http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php
So I end up with another page? How does it help me?
This is a simple utility page that will be used from all cross-domain calls. Actually, this page is in-fact a kind of a proxi, but it is not a server, but a simple and static HTML page, that anybody with notepad and a browser can use.
All this page has to do is invoke the callback on the top-level document, with the response-data from the server. Client-Side scripting has access to all URL parts, and the server can put it's response there encoded as part of it, as well as the name of the callback that has to be invoked. Means - this page can be a static and HTML page, and does not have to be a dynamic server-side page :)
This utility page will take the information from the URL it runs in - specifically in my implementation bellow - the Query-String parameters (or you can write your own implementation using anchor-ID - i.e the part of a url right to the "#" sign). And since this page is static - it can be even allowed to be cached :)
Won't adding for every POST request a DIV, a SCRIPT and an IFRAME eventually leak memory?
If you leave it in the page - it will. If you clean after you - it will not. All we have to do is give an ID to the DIV that we can use to celan-up the DIV and the FORM and IFRAME inside it whenever the response arrives from the server, or times out.
What do we get?
Effectively a POST cross-domain call, including attached files and multi-part and all :)
What are the limits?
The server response is limited to whatever fits into a redirection.
The server must ALWAYS return a REDIRECT to a POST requests. That include 404 and 500 errors.
Alternatively - create a timeout on the client just before firing the request, so you'll have a chance to detect requests that have not returned.
not everybody can understand all this and all the stages involved. it's a kind of an infrastructure level work, but once you get it running - it rocks :)
Can I use it for PUT and DELETE calls?
FORM tag does not PUT and DELETE.
But that's better then nothing :)
Ok, got the concept. How is it done technically?
What I do is:
I create the DIV, style it as invisible, and append it to the DOM. I also give it an ID that I can clean it up from the DOM after the server response has arrived (the same way JQuery cleans it's JSONP SCRIPT tasgs - but the DIV).
Then I compose a string that contains both IFRAME and FORM - with all attributes, properties and input fields, and inject it into the invisible DIV. it is important to inject this string into the DIV only AFTER the div is in the DOM. If not - it will not work on all browsers.
After that - I obtain a reference to the FORM and submit it.
Just remember one line before that - to set a Timeout callback in case the server does not respond, or responds in a wrong way.
The callback function contains the clean-up code. It is also called by timer in case of a response-timeout (and cleans it's timeout-timer when a server response arrives).
Show me the code!
The code snippet bellow is totally "neutral" on "pure" javascript, and declares whatever utility it needs. Just for simplification of explaining the idea - it all runs on the global scope, however it should be a little more sophisticated...
Organize it in functions as you may and parameterize what you need - but make sure that all parts that need to see each other run on the same scope :)
For this example - assume the client runs on http://samedomain.com and the server runs on http://crossdomain.com.
The script code on the top-level document
//declare the Async-call callback function on the global scope
function myAsyncJSONPCallback(data){
//clean up
var e = document.getElementById(id);
if (e) e.parentNode.removeChild(e);
clearTimeout(timeout);
if (data && data.error){
//handle errors & TIMEOUTS
//...
return;
}
//use data
//...
}
var serverUrl = "http://crossdomain.com/server/page"
, params = { param1 : "value of param 1" //I assume this value to be passed
, param2 : "value of param 2" //here I just declare it...
, callback: "myAsyncJSONPCallback"
}
, clientUtilityUrl = "http://samedomain.com/utils/postResponse.html"
, id = "some-unique-id"// unique Request ID. You can generate it your own way
, div = document.createElement("DIV") //this is where the actual work start!
, HTML = [ "<IFRAME name='ifr_",id,"'></IFRAME>"
, "<form target='ifr_",id,"' method='POST' action='",serverUrl
, "' id='frm_",id,"' enctype='multipart/form-data'>"
]
, each, pval, timeout;
//augment utility func to make the array a "StringBuffer" - see usage bellow
HTML.add = function(){
for (var i =0; i < arguments.length; i++)
this[this.length] = arguments[i];
}
//add rurl to the params object - part of infrastructure work
params.rurl = clientUtilityUrl //ABSOLUTE URL to the utility page must be on
//the SAME DOMAIN as page that makes the request
//add all params to composed string of FORM and IFRAME inside the FORM tag
for(each in params){
pval = params[each].toString().replace(/\"/g,""");//assure: that " mark will not break
HTML.add("<input name='",each,"' value='",pval,"'/>"); // the composed string
}
//close FORM tag in composed string and put all parts together
HTML.add("</form>");
HTML = HTML.join(""); //Now the composed HTML string ready :)
//prepare the DIV
div.id = id; // this ID is used to clean-up once the response has come, or timeout is detected
div.style.display = "none"; //assure the DIV will not influence UI
//TRICKY: append the DIV to the DOM and *ONLY THEN* inject the HTML in it
// for some reason it works in all browsers only this way. Injecting the DIV as part
// of a composed string did not always work for me
document.body.appendChild(div);
div.innerHTML = HTML;
//TRICKY: note that myAsyncJSONPCallback must see the 'timeout' variable
timeout = setTimeout("myAsyncJSONPCallback({error:'TIMEOUT'})",4000);
document.getElementById("frm_"+id+).submit();
The server on the cross-domain
The response from the server is expected to be a REDIRECTION, either by HTTP-Header or by writing a SCRIPT tag. (redirection is better, SCRIPT tag is easier to debug with JS breakpoints).
Here's the example of the header, assuming the rurl value from above
Location: http://samedomain.com/HTML/page?callback=myAsyncJSONPCallback&data=whatever_the_server_has_to_return
Note that
the value of the data argument can be a JavaScript Object-Literal or JSON expression, however it better be url-encoded.
the length of the server response is limited to the length of a URL a browser can process.
Also - in my system the server has a default value for the rurl so that this parameter is optional. But you can do that only if your client-application and server-application are coupled.
APIs to emit redirection header:
http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php
Alternatively, you can have the server write as a response the following:
<script>
location.href="http://samedomain.com/HTML/page?callback=myAsyncJSONPCallback&data=whatever_the_server_has_to_return"
</script>
But HTTP-Headers would be considered more clean ;)
The utility page on the same domain as the top-level document
I use the same utility page as rurl for all my post requests: all it does is take the name of the callback and the parameters from the Query-String using client side code, and call it on the parent document. It can do it ONLY when this page runs in the EXACT same domain as the page that fired the request! Important: Unlike cookies - subdomains do not count!! It has to he the exact same domain.
It's also make it more efficient if this utility page contains no references to other resources -including JS libraries. So this page is plain JavaScript. But you can implement it however you like.
Here's the responder page that I use, who's URL is found in the rurl of the POST request (in the example: http://samedomain.com/utils/postResponse.html )
<html><head>
<script type="text/javascript">
//parse and organize all QS parameters in a more comfortable way
var params = {};
if (location.search.length > 1) {
var i, arr = location.search.substr(1).split("&");
for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
arr[i] = arr[i].split("=");
params[arr[i][0]] = unescape(arr[i][1]);
}
}
//support server answer as JavaScript Object-Literals or JSON:
// evaluate the data expression
try {
eval("params.data = " + params.data);
} catch (e) {
params.data = {error: "server response failed with evaluation error: " + e.message
,data : params.data
}
}
//invoke the callback on the parent
try{
window.parent[ params.callback ](params.data || "no-data-returned");
}catch(e){
//if something went wrong - at least let's learn about it in the
// console (in addition to the timeout)
throw "Problem in passing POST response to host page: \n\n" + e.message;
}
</script>
</head><body></body></html>
It's not much automation and 'ready-made' library like jQuery and involes some 'manual' work - but it has the charm :)
If you're a keen fan of ready-made libraries - you can also check on Dojo Toolkit that when last I checked (about a year ago) - had their own implementation for the same mechanism.
http://dojotoolkit.org/
Good luck buddy, I hope it helps...
Is there a way to do a JSONP request using POST/PUT/DELETE?
No there isn't.
No. Consider what JSONP is: an injection of a new <script> tag in the document. The browser performs a GET request to pull the script pointed to by the src attribute. There's no way to specify any other HTTP verb when doing this.
Rather than banging our heads with JSONP method, that actually won't
support POST method by default, we can go for CORS .That will provide no big changes in the conventional way of programming. By simple Jquery Ajax call we can go with cross domains.
In CORS method, you have to add headers in server side scripting file, or in the server itself(in remote domain), for enabling this access. This is much reliable, since we can prevent/restrict the domains making unwanted calls.
It can be found in detail in wikipedia page.
I'm trying to make a field similar to the facebook share box where you can enter a url and it gives you data about the page, title, pictures, etc. I have set up a server side service to get the html from the page as a string and am trying to just get the page title. I tried this:
function getLinkData(link) {
link = '/Home/GetStringFromURL?url=' + link;
$.ajax({
url: link,
success: function (data) {
$('#result').html($(data).find('title').html());
$('#result').fadeIn('slow');
}
});
}
which doesn't work, however the following does:
$(data).appendTo('#result')
var title = $('#result').find('title').html();
$('#result').html(title);
$('#result').fadeIn('slow');
but I don't want to write all the HTML to the page as in some case it redirects and does all sorts of nasty things. Any ideas?
Thanks
Ben
Try using filter rather than find:
$('#result').html($(data).filter('title').html());
To do this with jQuery, .filter is what you need (as lonesomeday pointed out):
$("#result").text($(data).filter("title").text());
However do not insert the HTML of the foreign document into your page. This will leave your site open to XSS attacks.
As has been pointed out, this depends on the browser's innerHTML implementation, so it does not work consistently.
Even better is to do all the relevant HTML processing on the server. Sending only the relevant information to your JS will make the client code vastly simpler and faster. You can whitelist safe/desired tags/attributes without ever worrying about dangerous ish getting sent to your users. Processing the HTML on the server will not slow down your site. Your language already has excellent HTML parsers, why not use them?.
When you place an entire HTML document into a jQuery object, all but the content of the <body> gets stripped away.
If all you need is the content of the <title>, you could try a simple regex:
var title = /<title>([^<]+)<\/title>/.exec(dat)[ 1 ];
alert(title);
Or using .split():
var title = dat.split( '<title>' )[1].split( '</title>' )[0];
alert(title);
The alternative is to look for the title yourself. Fortunately, unlike most parse your own html questions, finding the title is very easy because it doesn;t allow any nested elements. Look in the string for something like <title>(.*)</title> and you should be set.
(yes yes yes I know never use regex on html, but this is an exceptionally simple case)