I recently came across the statement :
var cookies = document.cookie.split(/;/);
and
var pair = allCookies[i].split("=", 2);
if (pair[0].replace(/^ +/, "") == "lastvisit")
In the first statement what does /;/ in the argument of split denote ?
In the second statement what does /^ +/ in the argument of replace denote ?
These are Regular Expressions.
Javascript supports them natively.
In this particular example:
.split(/;/) uses ; as the split character;
.replace(/^ +/, "") removes ("") any (+) leading (^) whitespace ().
In both examples, / surround or delimit the regular expression (or "regex"), informing Javascript that you're providing a regex.
Follow the links provided above for more information; regexes are broad in scope and worth learning.
Slashes delimit a regular expression, just like quotes delimit a string.
/;/ matches a semi-colon. Specifically:
var cookies = document.cookie.split(/;/);
Means we split the document.cookie string into an array, splitting it where there are semicolons. So it would take something like "a;b;c" and turn it into ["a", "b", "c"].
pair[0].replace(/^ +/, "")
Just strips all leading whitespace. It turns
" lastvisit"
into
"lastvisit"
The caret ^ means "beginning of line", it's followed by space, and the + means to repeat the space one or more times, as many as possible.
The // syntax denotes a regular expression (also known as a 'regex').
Regex is a syntax for searching and replacing strings.
The first example you gave is /;/. This is a very simply regex which just searches the string for semi-colons, and then splits it into an array based on the result. Since this is not using any special regex functionality, it could just as easily have been expressed as a simple string, ie split(";") (as has been done with the equal sign in your other example), without making any difference to the result.
The second example is /^ +/. This is more complex and requires a bit of knowledge of how regex works. In short, what it is doing is searching for leading spaces on a string, and removing them.
To learn more about regex, I recommend this site as a good starting point: http://www.regular-expressions.info/
Hope that helps.
I think that /^ +/ means: one or more no-" " characters
Related
Is it possible to write a regex that returns the converse of a desired result? Regexes are usually inclusive - finding matches. I want to be able to transform a regex into its opposite - asserting that there are no matches. Is this possible? If so, how?
http://zijab.blogspot.com/2008/09/finding-opposite-of-regular-expression.html states that you should bracket your regex with
/^((?!^ MYREGEX ).)*$/
, but this doesn't seem to work. If I have regex
/[a|b]./
, the string "abc" returns false with both my regex and the converse suggested by zijab,
/^((?!^[a|b].).)*$/
. Is it possible to write a regex's converse, or am I thinking incorrectly?
Couldn't you just check to see if there are no matches? I don't know what language you are using, but how about this pseudocode?
if (!'Some String'.match(someRegularExpression))
// do something...
If you can only change the regex, then the one you got from your link should work:
/^((?!REGULAR_EXPRESSION_HERE).)*$/
The reason your inverted regex isn't working is because of the '^' inside the negative lookahead:
/^((?!^[ab].).)*$/
^ # WRONG
Maybe it's different in vim, but in every regex flavor I'm familiar with, the caret matches the beginning of the string (or the beginning of a line in multiline mode). But I think that was just a typo in the blog entry.
You also need to take into account the semantics of the regex tool you're using. For example, in Perl, this is true:
"abc" =~ /[ab]./
But in Java, this isn't:
"abc".matches("[ab].")
That's because the regex passed to the matches() method is implicitly anchored at both ends (i.e., /^[ab].$/).
Taking the more common, Perl semantics, /[ab]./ means the target string contains a sequence consisting of an 'a' or 'b' followed by at least one (non-line separator) character. In other words, at ANY point, the condition is TRUE. The inverse of that statement is, at EVERY point the condition is FALSE. That means, before you consume each character, you perform a negative lookahead to confirm that the character isn't the beginning of a matching sequence:
(?![ab].).
And you have to examine every character, so the regex has to be anchored at both ends:
/^(?:(?![ab].).)*$/
That's the general idea, but I don't think it's possible to invert every regex--not when the original regexes can include positive and negative lookarounds, reluctant and possessive quantifiers, and who-knows-what.
You can invert the character set by writing a ^ at the start ([^…]). So the opposite expression of [ab] (match either a or b) is [^ab] (match neither a nor b).
But the more complex your expression gets, the more complex is the complementary expression too. An example:
You want to match the literal foo. An expression, that does match anything else but a string that contains foo would have to match either
any string that’s shorter than foo (^.{0,2}$), or
any three characters long string that’s not foo (^([^f]..|f[^o].|fo[^o])$), or
any longer string that does not contain foo.
All together this may work:
^[^fo]*(f+($|[^o]|o($|[^fo]*)))*$
But note: This does only apply to foo.
You can also do this (in python) by using re.split, and splitting based on your regular expression, thus returning all the parts that don't match the regex, how to find the converse of a regex
In perl you can anti-match with $string !~ /regex/;.
With grep, you can use --invert-match or -v.
Java Regexps have an interesting way of doing this (can test here) where you can create a greedy optional match for the string you want, and then match data after it. If the greedy match fails, it's optional so it doesn't matter, if it succeeds, it needs some extra data to match the second expression and so fails.
It looks counter-intuitive, but works.
Eg (foo)?+.+ matches bar, foox and xfoo but won't match foo (or an empty string).
It might be possible in other dialects, but couldn't get it to work myself (they seem more willing to backtrack if the second match fails?)
Tried to search for /\,$/ online, but coudnt find anything.
I have:
coords = coords.replace(/\,$/, "");
Im guessing it returns coords string index number. What I have to search online for this, so I can learn more?
/\,$/ finds the comma character (,) at the end of a string (denoted by the $) and replaces it with empty (""). You sometimes see this in regex code aiming to clean up excerpts of text.
It's a regular expression to remove a trailing comma.
That thing is a Regular Expression, also known as regex or regexp. It is a way to "match" strings using some rules. If you want to learn how to use it in JavaScript, read the Mozilla Developer Network page about RegExp.
By the way, regular expressions are also available on most languages and in some tools. It is a very useful thing to learn.
That's a regular expression that finds a comma at the end of a string. That code removes the comma.
// defines a JavaScript regular expression, used to match a pattern within a string.
\,$ is the pattern
In this case \, translates to ,. A backslash is used to escape special characters, but in this case, it's not necessary. An example where it would be necessary would be to remove trailing periods. If you tried to do that with /.$/ the period here has a different meaning; it is used as a wildcard to match [almost] any character (aside for some newlines). So in this case to match on "." (period character) you would have to escape the wildcard (/\.$/).
When $ is placed at the end of the pattern, it means only look at the end of the string. This means that you can't mistakingly find a comma anywhere in the middle of the string (e.g., not after help in help, me,), only at the end (trailing). It also speeds of the regular expression search considerably. If you wanted to match on characters only at the beginning of the string, you would start off the pattern with a carat (^), for instance /^,/ would find a comma at the start of a string if one existed.
It's also important to note that you're only removing one comma, whereas if you use the plus (+) after the comma, you'd be replacing one or more: /,+$/.
Without the +; trailing commas,, becomes trailing commas,
With the +; no trailing comma,, becomes no trailing comma
is it possible to make a regex with multiple delimiters? For example I want to split a string which can come in two forms: 1. "string1, string2, string3" or 2. "string1,string2,string3". I've been trying to do this in javascript but with no success so far.
Just use a regex split():
var string = "part1,part2, part3, part4, part5",
components = string.split(/,\s*/);
JS Fiddle demo.
The reason I've used * rather than ? is simply because it allows for no white-space or many white-spaces. Whereas the ? matches zero-or-one white-space (which is exactly what you asked, but even so).
Incidentally, if there might possibly be white-spaces preceding the comma, then it might be worth amending the split() regex to:
var string = "part1,part2 , part3, part4, part5",
components = string.split(/\s*,\s*/);
console.log(components);
JS Fiddle demo.
Which splits the supplied string on zero-or-more whitespace followed by a comma followed by zero-or-more white-space. This may, of course, be entirely unnecessary.
References:
Regular Expressions.
string.split().
Yes, make the whitespace (\s) optional using ?:
var s = "string1,string2,string3";
s.split(/,\s?/);
In addition to silva
just in case you have doubt it can have more than one space then use (or no space)
var s = "string1, string2, string3";
s.split(/,\s*/);
I'm writing a function that takes a prospective filename and validates it in order to ensure that no system disallowed characters are in the filename. These are the disallowed characters: / \ | * ? " < >
I could obviously just use string.indexOf() to search for each special char one by one, but that's a lot longer than it would be to just use string.search() using a regular expression to find any of those characters in the filename.
The problem is that most of these characters are considered to be part of describing a regular expression, so I'm unsure how to include those characters as actually being part of the regex itself. For example, the / character in a Javascript regex tells Javascript that it is the beginning or end of the regex. How would one write a JS regex that functionally behaves like so: filename.search(\ OR / OR | OR * OR ? OR " OR < OR >)
Put your stuff in a character class like so:
[/\\|*?"<>]
You're gonna have to escape the backslash, but the other characters lose their special meaning. Also, RegExp's test() method is more appropriate than String.search in this case.
filenameIsInvalid = /[/\\|*?"<>]/.test(filename);
Include a backslash before the special characters [\^$.|?*+(){}, for instance, like \$
You can also search for a character by specified ASCII/ANSI value. Use \xFF where FF are 2 hexadecimal digits. Here is a hex table reference. http://www.asciitable.com/ Here is a regex reference http://www.regular-expressions.info/reference.html
The correct syntax of the regex is:
/^[^\/\\|\*\?"<>]+$/
The [^ will match anything, but anything that is matched in the [^] group will return the match as null. So to check for validation is to match against null.
Demo: jsFiddle.
Demo #2: Comparing against null.
The first string is valid; the second is invalid, hence null.
But obviously, you need to escape regex characters that are used in the matching. To escape a character that is used for regex needs to have a backslash before the character, e.g. \*, \/, \$, \?.
You'll need to escape the special characters. In javascript this is done by using the \ (backslash) character.
I'd recommend however using something like xregexp which will handle the escaping for you if you wish to match a string literal (something that is lacking in javascript's native regex support).
I have a string and I want to validate that string so that it must not contain certain characters like '/' '\' '&' ';' etc... How can I validate all that at once?
You can solve this with regular expressions!
mystring = "hello"
yourstring = "bad & string"
validRegEx = /^[^\\\/&]*$/
alert(mystring.match(validRegEx))
alert(yourstring.match(validRegEx))
matching against the regex returns the string if it is ok, or null if its invalid!
Explanation:
JavaScript RegEx Literals are delimited like strings, but with slashes (/'s) instead of quotes ("'s).
The first and last characters of the validRegEx cause it to match against the whole string, instead of just part, the carat anchors it to the beginning, and the dollar sign to the end.
The part between the brackets ([ and ]) are a character class, which matches any character so long as it's in the class. The first character inside that, a carat, means that the class is negated, to match the characters not mentioned in the character class. If it had been omited, the class would match the characters it specifies.
The next two sequences, \\ and \/ are backslash escaped because the backslash by itself would be an escape sequence for something else, and the forward slash would confuse the parser into thinking that it had reached the end of the regex, (exactly similar to escaping quotes in strings).
The ampersand (&) has no special meaning and is unescaped.
The remaining character, the kleene star, (*) means that whatever preceeded it should be matched zero or more times, so that the character class will eat as many characters that are not forward or backward slashes or ampersands, including none if it cant find any. If you wanted to make sure the matched string was non-empty, you can replace it with a plus (+).
I would use regular expressions.
See this guide from Mozillla.org. This article does also give a good introduction to regular expressions in JavaScript.
Here is a good article on Javascript validation. Remember you will need to validate on the server side too. Javascript validation can easily be circumvented, so it should never be used for security reasons such as preventing SQL Injection or XSS attacks.
You could learn regular expressions, or (probably simpler if you only check for one character at a time) you could have a list of characters and then some kind of sanitize function to remove each one from the string.
var myString = "An /invalid &string;";
var charList = ['/', '\\', '&', ';']; // etc...
function sanitize(input, list) {
for (char in list) {
input = input.replace(char, '');
}
return input
}
So then:
sanitize(myString, charList) // returns "An invalid string"
You can use the test method, with regular expressions:
function validString(input){
return !(/[\\/&;]/.test(input));
}
validString('test;') //false
You can use regex. For example if your string matches:
[\\/&;]+
then it is not valid. Look at:
http://www.regular-expressions.info/javascriptexample.html
You could probably use a regular expression.
As the others have answered you can solve this with regexp but remember to also check the value server-side. There is no guarantee that the user has JavaScript activated. Never trust user input!