I'm building a service that allows people to put a javascript code I gave them to their site.
The javascript code is based on jQuery.
My question is how to do this to be safe and optimized, cause I don't want to break certain users website.
The thing I'm looking for so far( you can update if you think I need to face other problems):
what happens when the user already has jquery loaded on their page? should I load my jquery library using different namespace or should I use his jquery library.
in case I can use his jquery library, I think I'll need to check to see if the versions corespond, but again is this safe?
in case I want to use his jquery library, how do I check if he has jquery loaded and if he has the right version
this is related to 3. what happen if he changes his jquery library that doesn't correspond with the library I think it will be, leading to a bad result.
Looking for your answers.
Thanks
Don't depend on the page's jQuery or try to use it. This will just turn into a support nightmare. You can't even be sure that a version is accurate, as the target page can alter its version of jQuery.
The best approach is for your code to create and load an iFrame. This gives you complete control over the iFrame's jQuery, CSS, etc. With vastly reduced chances of conflict.
If the iFrame approach is not possible for some reason, Use noConflict to minimize the chance of conflicting jQuery versions.
Something like this:
<script type="text/javascript">
if ($ || jQuery) {
var PagesLibrary = $;
var PagesjQuery = jQuery;
</script>
<!-- load your jQuery -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://example.com/jquery-1.6.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var my_jQuery = $.noConflict (true);
if (PagesjQuery) {
$ = PagesLibrary;
jQuery = PagesjQuery;
}
</script>
Then instead of $('#selector').function();,
Use: my_jQuery('#selector').function();.
Without the context of actually what your injected code does, it's hard to say. If you're writing a general bit of functionality, you probably want to just implement it as a jQuery plugin, specify what version you target, and then leave it to your users to decide how to include it, etc.
However, it sounds more like you're writing a service of some kind. In that case, I recommend the following course:
Place all the code you depend on (jQuery, other libraries, your code, etc) in an anonymous function wrapper, and have the snippet you have people just inject a script tag pointing to your js file. This is most likely to give you reliable results. If you require special information, like an ID, have the snippet just before the injection code set those values in a global variable, or have extra code that runs just after the injection to call a function of yours with the data. Look at how Google Analytics accomplishes this for reference. Either way, you'll need to affect the global scope.
I know that may not be what you wanted to hear. You could always create an elaborate jQuery detection and injection scheme, but you'd run into exactly the problems you mention (like version collisions etc). The safe way to go is to combine all the code you require along with your own and provide it all as one file which only makes internal references.
Hope this helps!
Related
Question: Is there a "built-in" or "easy" way to set the jQuery namespace before the jquery.js script include?
Reason I ask is because I'm working on a script that utilizes the jQuery library, and the script is to go on a page that has a library that uses the $ namespace already. Normally I can just use jQuery.noConflict() except the problem is, there is code on the page (which I cannot control) that hooks into mouse movement events and other stuff that basically triggers calls to the 3rd party code over and over the entire time, so often in fact, that more often than not, js errors are happening between the time the jQuery script is loaded and the .noConflict() call is made. I cannot control or change that 3rd party script.
So basically I need the jQuery object to be instantiated without ever taking $ namespace in the first place. Now.. I'm certain that I could reverse engineer jquery.js and make it not do that, but before I go down that road, I figured surely others have come across this situation.. but I could find no official documentation on jQuery for setting this before the script include; only after. But I figured surely others have come across a problem like this anyways, but I can't seem to find any existing questions detailing this (it could be that I just suck at googling).
Can anybody point me in the right direction?
Edit:
To be clear, this is basically the order in which I need things to happen:
<script src='thirdpartyscript.js'></script>
<script type='text/javascript'>
jQuery.noConflict();
</script>
<script src='jquery.js'></script>
I obviously can't call jQuery.noConflict() before the jquery.js script include, since the jQuery object/method doesn't exist yet.
But I can't call it after the script include, because between time it takes for jquery.js to fully execute and the noConflict call to be made, thirdpartyscript is already throwing errors because jquery took control of $, even for just that one single microsecond or w/e.
So.. I know I can edit jquery.js to never use $ namespace, but I was wondering if there was a built-in way or otherwise easy hack to do it before the jquery.js script include, because a) I don't want to hack jquery.js itself, because I'd like to keep pointing to code.jquery.com instead of maintaining my own instance, b) doing so involves actually figuring out what to change (which in fairness I did a quick eyeballing and it doesn't look like much. mostly my caveat is with point "a")
wont work. The object "jQuery" is not available if you include the lib later. You can create an smart "Watcher" for that.
<script src='thirdpartyscript.js'></script>
<script type='text/javascript'>
// Start an interval
var watch = setInterval(function() {
// Check if jQuery available
if(typeof(jQuery) != 'undefined') {
// Stop the interval
clearInterval(watch);
jQuery.noConflict();
}
}, 500);
</script>
<script src='jquery.js'></script>
I have a project that requires a custom JavaScript library to be included in end user's websites. Sort of a third party thing, think JavaScript tracking like Google Analytics.
We'll have no control over what other JS libraries/frameworks might also be loaded or what versions.
I'd like to be able to leverage jQuery's event delegation, selector and AJAX functionalities but:
Not cause any conflicts with other libraries or other versions of
jQuery that might be loaded
Not require the end user to have to think
about including jQuery separately.
So, rolling in all of jQuery sort of seems like overkill but again, event delegation, selector and AJAX are required. I know jQuery's sizzel engine is broken out in such a way that it's possible to include it in 3rd party libraries and there are plenty of tiny AJAX libraries but we need good event delegation support as well. Additionally, I foresee us needing to do some heavy DOM lifting with this library in the near future as well so it's arguable we do need most of jQuery's functionality.
Any suggestions on how to encapsulate jQuery in such a way that we don't trample over anyone's code? Also, how advisable is this? It does feel a tad iffy.
Also, what's the best wat to encapsulate it into another library? Is there a better way than this?:
(function(window){
window.myNamespace = {
_jq:null,
init: function(){
// Include jQuery
myNamespace.setJq();
},
setJq:function(){
/*! jQuery v1.8.2 jquery.com | jquery.org/license */
(function(a,b){function G(a){...}}) // <- minified jQuery
// Stash a local copy of jQuery
myNamespace._jq = jQuery;
// Return $ and jQuery namespace
$.noConflict(true);
}
}
})(window)
(We intend on offering a version of the library without jQuery for those savvy enough to know that it's already loaded on their page and what version they're using)
Have a look at jQuery in Parts: https://github.com/mythz/jquip
What about dong a conditional load... Test if $ exists. If it does, don't load the script. If it doesn't, then load it.
You could use the following pattern to make sure that the jQuery is being passed in to the function and then you can map it to the local variable $ without issues.
(function(window,$){
//use $ as a local jQuery variable
})(window,jQuery);
I am in big trouble at the moment. We have a huge JS library that I need to maintain. It uses internally jQuery 1.6.2.
The client where we installed the library uses jQuery 1.3.4 and the fancybox overlay plugin.
After loading these two, he simply throws in a
jQuery.noConflict();
but without saving his jQuery to a variable (namespacing).
Now I need to access his fancybox, but if I use
$.fancybox({...})
or
jQuery.fancybox({...})
I get in both cases an "is not a method error".
I can duplicate the error on my local machine and it would not appear without the jQuery.noConflict(); statement.
We are also doing a noConflict with our jQuery but we save it to another varieable, i.e.
jq162 = jQuery.noConflict();
The problem is the customer is of course unwilling to change anything of his code.
Is there any way how I can access his jQuery / Fancy after this statement and after loading our 1.6.2?
thanks in advance...
UPDATE
the scripts are loaded in the following order:
// client
jquery 1.4.2
jquery fancybox
<script type="text/javascript"> jQuery.noConflict(); </script>
jQuery 1.2.6 which seems to be necessary for Liferay
// now comes my library
jQuery 1.6.2
my scripts
i know, if we could change step 3 to
<script type="text/javascript"> $jq = jQuery.noConflict(); </script> it would work, but right now that is out of my influence.
in 6. myscripts I need to access the fancybox from 2.
any ideas?
It shouldn't be a problem. You must be loading your scripts after the client's scripts (if you're loading yours first, there shouldn't be any problem, your jquery is namespaced, and the clients version will be in jQuery along with the plugin).
So simply namespace his jQuery object before you load your script:
<script>
jq132 = jQuery;
</script>
<script src="yourScripts"></script>
<script>
jq162 = jQuery.noConflict();
console.log(jq132.fancybox);
</script>
UPDATE
As per your update, what you're trying to do is impossible. There is no longer a reachable reference to that jQuery/plugin instance (unless fancybox accidentally leaked a global reference, which I highly doubt). I don't know fancybox, although it's possible that the functionality isn't instance-specific. So it may be possible to just reattach fancybox to your version of jquery, and it will be able to perform all the necessary things. What I said about the reference however, remains true.
Obviously adding a few characters like you suggested (or other similar ways) would solve the problem. But if that is impossible, then your client will have to realise that. It should be proof enough if you simply ask them to access there own plugin under the same conditions - i.e. without changing code.
They should probably have a long and hard think about their entire project. Having to load three different versions of the same product is a sign that something is very very wrong.
Is it safe to inject JQuery's script using JsonP?
The installation of my web application is - adding a script to a customer's website (like google analytics). I was thinking of using JQuery on the customer's website, as part of my own injected script.
I was wondering, if there is some kind of risk?
The application needs to support any kind of website.
Thank you
Yaron
Its hard to tell what you are doing with your library, but it seems you are building some type of widget for use on multiple sites.
From here down has been updated after an enlightening comment from #K Prime caused me research exactly how you could include two copies of jQuery if needed:
It is generally bad to use jQuery if you are building a widget that will live on a site outside your control, and will be added to the site with a "copy this embed code and paste onto your site" type of functionality. (Of course jQuery widgets and plugins abound, but these are normally chosen and installed/implemented by developers not a generic "copy-n-paste" widget type implementation)
Probably the biggest reason (after realizing you can run two copies of jQuery on the same page) is the file size increase. Whether it is warranted will depend on your particular needs and function. Simple small widget = straight JS. Complex website front-end extension, then it probably is worth the file-size increase.
To include it properly (so you don't run into conflicts on their site) follow a workflow that looks something like this:
Dynamically add jQuery to their page using the Google APIs as mentioned on the other answers here.
Run var mywidget_jQuery = $.noConflict( true ); which will restore the original meaning of $ and restore the original meaning of window.jQuery.
Dynamically add your script file, but be sure to wrap the entire thing in a self executing anonymous function like this:
JS
(function($){
... Your code here ...
})(mywidget_jQuery);
Now, you can safely use $ inside your special function and all the jQuery features you want without issue.
Extra credit You could wrap steps 1 and 2 in an if statement that tests if window.jQuery is defined and if it, test if jQuery.fn.version is high enough to run your code. If either test fails, then run steps 1 and 2. If it passes, however, then just run var mywidget_jQuery = window.jQuery so the script you include in step 3 will still run.
You can add jQuery to a website by simply adding a <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3/jquery.js" /> element.
However, make sure to call jQuery.noConflict() in case they use a different $ keyword.
If you're just after a reference to the library, why wouldn't you just link to the API hosted on Google Code?
I'm working on a new project in JavaScript that I want to release later. Besides other functionality, this script requires a little DOM manipulation. To make this XB (Cross-Browser) and not inventing the wheel again, I need help of a existing JavaScript library. Because of the large number of great libraries I don't want to force one library for this project. That's why I want to support multiple libraries in one script.
Knowing my jQuery, but other library I don't have enough experience. So I was wondering if theres a tutorial or article that gives light on the supporting multiple JavaScript libraries in a script?
I've read somewhere that the same is possible with CSS selector engines (Sizzle, Selector.js, Peppy, NWMatcher, cssQuery), but I don't know about JS.
Well, with jQuery, you can use the $.noConflict() function to remove the '$' and 'jQuery' variables from the global namespace, preventing possible issues if other parts of the page use another version of jQuery or another library that declares the '$' variable.
Here's a simple example...
<script src="/path/to/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<!-- load plugins you require here -->
<script type="text/javascript">
var myUniquelyNamedVar = {};
myUniquelyNamedVar.jQuery = $.noConflict(true); // de-aliases jQuery, but gives you a private reference (if you need it)
(function($) {
// use an anonymous function and pass in your private jQuery instance; inside this function you can use $ like normal...
})(myUniquelyNamedVar.jQuery);
</script>
I've used this approach with JSR-168 portlets and had great success. It allows me to have several portlets on a page, each of which could be using a different version of jQuery or different plugins.
I don't think there's a lot about the common frameworks that's similar enough to usefully abstract them anyway. Stick to regular DOM as much as possible.
About the only useful, reusable operation I can think of that many frameworks provide in a similar fashion would be the selector engine. So something like:
function querySelectorAll(selector) {
if ('querySelectorAll' in document)
return document.querySelectorAll(selector); // native Selectors-API is best
if ('jQuery' in window)
return jQuery(selector); // returns a wrapper object, but it's enough like an array
if ('$$' in window)
return $$(selector); // prototype
if ('YAHOO' in window && 'util' in YAHOO && 'Selector' in YAHOO.util)
return YAHOO.util.Selector.query(selector); // yui
// others?
throw 'No selector engine found';
}
The second comment on this page gives an interesting answer: Swiss – a JavaScript framework framework.