I have an issue with relative paths whereby when the web app is running off subdirectory of the domain, the paths are not correct. e.g. http://www.example.com/webapp/
If I use #Url.Content("~/path/to/action") on the page it is fine. I can even embed the #Url.Content("") inside the javascript script. I want to clean up the page I wanted to put the javascript inside a js file and reference that. Now that the #Url.Content is being called inside the javascript file, it doesn't seem to work (probably for obvious reasons). How can I get around this issue?
I had a look at the <base /> but that doesn't seem to work.
Now that you moved everything into a separate js file, the file is being served as static content, and the Razor syntax is not being parsed.
If you need relative paths inside of your js which might change, then you should include a script in each page which sets a path var, and use #Url.Content(...) in this script, e.g.,
<script type="text/javascript">
pathToAction = "#Url.Content(...)";
</script>
Then, declare the pathToAction var in your js file, and use it as needed.
Related
I linked all the javascript files in the header.php at atime. I included header.php in all pages
When I link the javascript files like this
<script src='js/home.js'></script>
<script src='js/disc.js'></script>
<script src='js/que.js'></script>
only last file js/que.js is working.
Make sure that the 'src' is referring to the correct file directory where the script is located. If you are using an IDE such as VS, then you may drag the file into the code and the IDE will automatically create the reference for you.
Unless you have problem with directory structure or you file name does not match with src attribute of script tag, there should not be any problem with. Please try to use type="text/javascript" and make sure your script tags are after header tag or just before </body> tag. Also keep sequence of files loading if any file depends on another file variable or any function. If it still does not work use try to see if there is any error in your code in console window.
I now I'm going to get voted down for this but oh well. I don't have enough points to comment which is what I would do but..oh well.
Okay it depends on what the scripts are doing. If you link the scripts in the head for you HTML page, and try a var element = document.getElementById("theID"); this will return null due to the fact that the browser has yet to read the HTML and hasn't had a chance to create a DOM (Document Object Model) tree. For a problem like this check out
<script>
function load() {
console.log("load event detected!");
}
window.onload = load;
</script>
This will assign window to an event/callback that will be invoked after the page has had time to load.
Look at where your JavaScript is used, and what it should be doing. Would those elements be rendered yet. Are you writing functions but not actually calling them (this happens A LOT)? It would be better if you described what the code was doing and your experience with HTML and JavaScript. Remember that the browser interprets the JavaScript as it encounters it, you can put script tags anywhere in your HTML file, not just in the head. Also are the .js files in the same directory as the HTML file or are the two non working .js files in the same directory as "js/que.js"? If not move them to the same file or use a relative or absolute path.
I've seen quite a few questions regarding loading a .js file into an HTML file, and I know how to do that. However, say I have the file "classlist.js." How can I go about using the classes defined in that javascript file in another javascript file? I keep seeing answers that suggest using the
<script type="text/javascript" src="filepath"></script>
syntax. When used in a .js file, though, it throws a syntax error on the "<" so I assume this code is invalid.
So, how would one utilize a function in a .js file that was defined in a separate .js file... that works, and is efficient (If there is one)?
EDIT:
I'm going to clarify some thing for the future, since I'm still fairly new to Javascript, and it looks like there were a number of other factors I didn't even know came into play.
I had two .js files, one of which declared classes that were extensions of classes in the other file. I wanted to use the extended classes in a webpage, and I thought I had to load the originial classes into the second .js file, THEN load that .js file into the HTML file. I wasn't programming completely outside of HTML.
Sorry for any misunderstanding, hopefully this thread is helpful to somebody else in the future.
Assuming you are talking about javascript in a web browser, all js files are loading in an html file, typically index.html. You need to use the script tag to load the javascript in the proper order in that html file, not in the javascript file. So if file B requires the things in file A, you need to load file A first, meaning put the script tag that loads file A before the script tag that loads file B.
Two answers:
Non Browser
If you're using JavaScript in a non-browser environment (NodeJS, RingoJS, SilkJS, Rhino, or any of a bunch of others), the answer depends on the environment — but many of these use the CommonJS require mechanism. E.g.:
// Get access to public symbols in foo.js
var foo = require("foo.js");
// Use the `bar` function exported by foo.js
foo.bar();
Browser
If you're using JavaScript in a browser, you put script tags like the one you quoted in the HTML, in the order in which they should be processed (so, scripts relying on things defined in other scripts should be included after the scripts they rely on).
If you want to maximize efficiency in terms of page load time, combine the scripts together on the server (probably also minifying/compressing/packing them) and use just the one script tag.
The answers posted above should do the trick however since you mentioned doing it efficiently you can consider taking a look at javascript module based loaders like require js( http://requirejs.org/ ) based on AMD
You have to put the reference to classlist.js in your HTML file (not your Javascript file), before any other SCRIPT element which requires it. For example, within the 'head' element:
<html>
<head>
<script src="testclass.js"></script>
<script src="file_using_testclass.js"></script>
<script>
var tc = new TestClass();
</script>
</head>
I have a site hosted by GitHub Pages that uses Jekyll, and I've been successfully using an internally defined script in each layout that will generate a random tagline from an array of them.
I'm trying to move this script to an external tagline.js, but so far I've been unsuccessful.
Here's the basic tagline generating script, in case there's something in the code causing this (which I doubt, honestly, due to its simplicity; but it's always a possibility):
var tags = [ 'tag1', 'tag2', 'tag3' ];
function getTag() {
return tags[Math.floor(Math.random() * tags.length)];
}
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#tagline").text(getTag());
});
Like I said, it works fine when it's internal, but it doesn't when I try linking to external. I'm pretty sure it's just a case of where I'm pointing the <script> to: the HTML file containing the <script> is in _layouts/default.html, but the script is in scripts/tagline.js:
<script type="text/javascript" href="../scripts/tagline.js"></script>
The attribute you want to use for a script call is src instead of href. For example:
<script type="text/javascript" src="../scripts/tagline.js"></script>
I would also highly recommend using paths from the site root (aka docroot) instead of relative to the file. That way you can use the same call in multiple places and it will always hit the correct location. To use a docroot relative URL, you start the path with a /.
Assuming your script is located at http://example.com/scripts/tagline.js, the call you would make is:
<script type="text/javascript" src="/scripts/tagline.js"></script>
Without using the docroot, you will constantly have to adjust the path depending on where the HTML file calling the script is located in the tree. If all the files are in the same place, that's not a big deal, but it's a good habit to get into to avoid issues down the road.
I put a function in an existing.js file (I tried two different files) so that the method would be available multiple places without repeating the code. I even created a simple function just to make sure it wasn't something my function was messing up.
function doNothing() {
alert("Dammit.");
}
I can see the method in the intellisense list in my .ascx control, but as soon as I try to step into it, it fails.
Below is how I tried to reference the file and it seemed to work as far as seeing the methods, but it won't work.
<script src="/javascript/messages.js" language="javascript" type="text/javascript"></script>
Any ideas? Any common mistakes that I may be making? It looks like it should work.
Note: when the methods are inside the .ascx file, they work fine, even with missing semi-colons.
Even if IntelliSense suggested "/javascript/messages.js", the path will be wrong if your application is installed under a virtual directory instead of at the root of the Web site. For example, the full URL of the JavaScript file might be at http://www.example.com/myapp/javascript/messages.js, but because the src attribute starts with a /, the browser will access http://www.example.com/javascript/messages.js (without the "myapp" virtual directory) instead.
If you're using WebForms, you can change the src attribute as follows:
src='<%= this.Page.ResolveClientUrl("~/javascript/messages.js") %>'
I am newby in Spring, but have a task, and I am learning on the fly.
I used Roo to generates for me part of the code, but now I have to make some dynamic list binding, which is done with form, popping-up in new window, and when the submit button is pushed I have to insert the new values in the parent window.
For the purpose I wrote a .js file, which hooks the values to the parent DOM tree, but the point is that I can't configure Spring to deliver the required .js file to the browser.
The browser, doesn't recognize my function. Even when I try to access the .js file via the browser, I receive error that the file couldn't not be found.
I've tried to configure the web.xml, but it didn't work...
Any ideas, how I can configure the access to a .js file in a Spring MVC application?
Thanks a lot!
P.S. Respectively, I'll need to grant access for a static .htm(l) file... I suppose the principle for configuration of the access of static html files is the same..., right?
You just need to get the path to the file right. Assuming you have a Maven-like set-up (I assume you do because you're using Roo), then your script belongs under src/main/webapp - probably in something like a scripts folder.
Let's assume that your file is at src/main/webapp/scripts/myscript.js
You can create a URL reference for your script by adding the following Spring tag:
<spring:url value="/scripts/myscript.js" var="script_url"/>
This should give you the right path to your script, regardless of the context in which you later decide to publish your webapp.
After that, it's just a matter of using that reference:
<script type="text/javascript" src="${script_url}"></script>