We Keep Coding

Can I use Array.prototype.some() to check if two arrays have two common elements? [duplicate]

I have a target array ["apple","banana","orange"], and I want to check if other arrays contain any one of the target array elements.
For example:
["apple","grape"] //returns true;
["apple","banana","pineapple"] //returns true;
["grape", "pineapple"] //returns false;
How can I do it in JavaScript?

Vanilla JS
ES2016:
const found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.includes(r))
ES6:
const found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.indexOf(r) >= 0)
How it works
some(..) checks each element of the array against a test function and returns true if any element of the array passes the test function, otherwise, it returns false. indexOf(..) >= 0 and includes(..) both return true if the given argument is present in the array.

vanilla js
/**
* #description determine if an array contains one or more items from another array.
* #param {array} haystack the array to search.
* #param {array} arr the array providing items to check for in the haystack.
* #return {boolean} true|false if haystack contains at least one item from arr.
*/
var findOne = function (haystack, arr) {
return arr.some(function (v) {
return haystack.indexOf(v) >= 0;
});
};
As noted by #loganfsmyth you can shorten it in ES2016 to
/**
* #description determine if an array contains one or more items from another array.
* #param {array} haystack the array to search.
* #param {array} arr the array providing items to check for in the haystack.
* #return {boolean} true|false if haystack contains at least one item from arr.
*/
const findOne = (haystack, arr) => {
return arr.some(v => haystack.includes(v));
};
or simply as arr.some(v => haystack.includes(v));
If you want to determine if the array has all the items from the other array, replace some() to every()
or as arr.every(v => haystack.includes(v));

ES6 solution:
let arr1 = [1, 2, 3];
let arr2 = [2, 3];
let isFounded = arr1.some( ai => arr2.includes(ai) );
Unlike of it: Must contains all values.
let allFounded = arr2.every( ai => arr1.includes(ai) );
Hope, will be helpful.

If you're not opposed to using a libray, http://underscorejs.org/ has an intersection method, which can simplify this:
var _ = require('underscore');
var target = [ 'apple', 'orange', 'banana'];
var fruit2 = [ 'apple', 'orange', 'mango'];
var fruit3 = [ 'mango', 'lemon', 'pineapple'];
var fruit4 = [ 'orange', 'lemon', 'grapes'];
console.log(_.intersection(target, fruit2)); //returns [apple, orange]
console.log(_.intersection(target, fruit3)); //returns []
console.log(_.intersection(target, fruit4)); //returns [orange]
The intersection function will return a new array with the items that it matched and if not matches it returns empty array.

ES6 (fastest)
const a = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
const b = ['c', 'a', 'd'];
a.some(v=> b.indexOf(v) !== -1)
ES2016
const a = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
const b = ['c', 'a', 'd'];
a.some(v => b.includes(v));
Underscore
const a = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
const b = ['c', 'a', 'd'];
_.intersection(a, b)
DEMO: https://jsfiddle.net/r257wuv5/
jsPerf: https://jsperf.com/array-contains-any-element-of-another-array

If you don't need type coercion (because of the use of indexOf), you could try something like the following:
var arr = [1, 2, 3];
var check = [3, 4];
var found = false;
for (var i = 0; i < check.length; i++) {
if (arr.indexOf(check[i]) > -1) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
console.log(found);
Where arr contains the target items. At the end, found will show if the second array had at least one match against the target.
Of course, you can swap out numbers for anything you want to use - strings are fine, like your example.
And in my specific example, the result should be true because the second array's 3 exists in the target.
UPDATE:
Here's how I'd organize it into a function (with some minor changes from before):
var anyMatchInArray = (function () {
"use strict";
var targetArray, func;
targetArray = ["apple", "banana", "orange"];
func = function (checkerArray) {
var found = false;
for (var i = 0, j = checkerArray.length; !found && i < j; i++) {
if (targetArray.indexOf(checkerArray[i]) > -1) {
found = true;
}
}
return found;
};
return func;
}());
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/u8Bzt/
In this case, the function could be modified to have targetArray be passed in as an argument instead of hardcoded in the closure.
UPDATE2:
While my solution above may work and be (hopefully more) readable, I believe the "better" way to handle the concept I described is to do something a little differently. The "problem" with the above solution is that the indexOf inside the loop causes the target array to be looped over completely for every item in the other array. This can easily be "fixed" by using a "lookup" (a map...a JavaScript object literal). This allows two simple loops, over each array. Here's an example:
var anyMatchInArray = function (target, toMatch) {
"use strict";
var found, targetMap, i, j, cur;
found = false;
targetMap = {};
// Put all values in the `target` array into a map, where
// the keys are the values from the array
for (i = 0, j = target.length; i < j; i++) {
cur = target[i];
targetMap[cur] = true;
}
// Loop over all items in the `toMatch` array and see if any of
// their values are in the map from before
for (i = 0, j = toMatch.length; !found && (i < j); i++) {
cur = toMatch[i];
found = !!targetMap[cur];
// If found, `targetMap[cur]` will return true, otherwise it
// will return `undefined`...that's what the `!!` is for
}
return found;
};
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/5Lv9v/
The downside to this solution is that only numbers and strings (and booleans) can be used (correctly), because the values are (implicitly) converted to strings and set as the keys to the lookup map. This isn't exactly good/possible/easily done for non-literal values.

Using filter/indexOf:
function containsAny(source,target)
{
var result = source.filter(function(item){ return target.indexOf(item) > -1});
return (result.length > 0);
}
//results
var fruits = ["apple","banana","orange"];
console.log(containsAny(fruits,["apple","grape"]));
console.log(containsAny(fruits,["apple","banana","pineapple"]));
console.log(containsAny(fruits,["grape", "pineapple"]));

You could use lodash and do:
_.intersection(originalTarget, arrayToCheck).length > 0
Set intersection is done on both collections producing an array of identical elements.

const areCommonElements = (arr1, arr2) => {
const arr2Set = new Set(arr2);
return arr1.some(el => arr2Set.has(el));
};
Or you can even have a better performance if you first find out which of these two arrays is longer and making Set out for the longest array, while applying some method on the shortest one:
const areCommonElements = (arr1, arr2) => {
const [shortArr, longArr] = (arr1.length < arr2.length) ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
const longArrSet = new Set(longArr);
return shortArr.some(el => longArrSet.has(el));
};

I wrote 3 solutions. Essentially they do the same. They return true as soon as they get true. I wrote the 3 solutions just for showing 3 different way to do things. Now, it depends what you like more. You can use performance.now() to check the performance of one solution or the other. In my solutions I'm also checking which array is the biggest and which one is the smallest to make the operations more efficient.
The 3rd solution may not be the cutest but is efficient. I decided to add it because in some coding interviews you are not allowed to use built-in methods.
Lastly, sure...we can come up with a solution with 2 NESTED for loops (the brute force way) but you want to avoid that because the time complexity is bad O(n^2).
Note:
instead of using .includes() like some other people did, you can use
.indexOf(). if you do just check if the value is bigger than 0. If
the value doesn't exist will give you -1. if it does exist, it will give you
greater than 0.
indexOf() vs includes()
Which one has better performance? indexOf() for a little bit, but includes is more readable in my opinion.
If I'm not mistaken .includes() and indexOf() use loops behind the scene, so you will be at O(n^2) when using them with .some().
USING loop
const compareArraysWithIncludes = (arr1, arr2) => {
const [smallArray, bigArray] =
arr1.length < arr2.length ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
for (let i = 0; i < smallArray.length; i++) {
return bigArray.includes(smallArray[i]);
}
return false;
};
USING .some()
const compareArraysWithSome = (arr1, arr2) => {
const [smallArray, bigArray] =
arr1.length < arr2.length ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
return smallArray.some(c => bigArray.includes(c));
};
USING MAPS Time complexity O(2n)=>O(n)
const compararArraysUsingObjs = (arr1, arr2) => {
const map = {};
const [smallArray, bigArray] =
arr1.length < arr2.length ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
for (let i = 0; i < smallArray.length; i++) {
if (!map[smallArray[i]]) {
map[smallArray[i]] = true;
}
}
for (let i = 0; i < bigArray.length; i++) {
if (map[bigArray[i]]) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
};
Code in my:
stackblitz
I'm not an expert in performance nor BigO so if something that I said is wrong let me know.

You can use a nested Array.prototype.some call. This has the benefit that it will bail at the first match instead of other solutions that will run through the full nested loop.
eg.
var arr = [1, 2, 3];
var match = [2, 4];
var hasMatch = arr.some(a => match.some(m => a === m));

I found this short and sweet syntax to match all or some elements between two arrays. For example
// OR operation. find if any of array2 elements exists in array1. This will return as soon as there is a first match as some method breaks when function returns TRUE
let array1 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'], array2 = ['a', 'b'];
console.log(array2.some(ele => array1.includes(ele)));
// prints TRUE
// AND operation. find if all of array2 elements exists in array1. This will return as soon as there is a no first match as some method breaks when function returns TRUE
let array1 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'], array2 = ['a', 'x'];
console.log(!array2.some(ele => !array1.includes(ele)));
// prints FALSE
Hope that helps someone in future!

Just one more solution
var a1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
var a2 = [2, 4]
Check if a1 contain all element of a2
var result = a1.filter(e => a2.indexOf(e) !== -1).length === a2.length
console.log(result)

What about using a combination of some/findIndex and indexOf?
So something like this:
var array1 = ["apple","banana","orange"];
var array2 = ["grape", "pineapple"];
var found = array1.some(function(v) { return array2.indexOf(v) != -1; });
To make it more readable you could add this functionality to the Array object itself.
Array.prototype.indexOfAny = function (array) {
return this.findIndex(function(v) { return array.indexOf(v) != -1; });
}
Array.prototype.containsAny = function (array) {
return this.indexOfAny(array) != -1;
}
Note: If you'd want to do something with a predicate you could replace the inner indexOf with another findIndex and a predicate

Here is an interesting case I thought I should share.
Let's say that you have an array of objects and an array of selected filters.
let arr = [
{ id: 'x', tags: ['foo'] },
{ id: 'y', tags: ['foo', 'bar'] },
{ id: 'z', tags: ['baz'] }
];
const filters = ['foo'];
To apply the selected filters to this structure we can
if (filters.length > 0)
arr = arr.filter(obj =>
obj.tags.some(tag => filters.includes(tag))
);
// [
// { id: 'x', tags: ['foo'] },
// { id: 'y', tags: ['foo', 'bar'] }
// ]

Good perfomance solution:
We should transform one of arrays to object.
const contains = (arr1, mainObj) => arr1.some(el => el in mainObj);
const includes = (arr1, mainObj) => arr1.every(el => el in mainObj);
Usage:
const mainList = ["apple", "banana", "orange"];
// We make object from array, you can use your solution to make it
const main = Object.fromEntries(mainList.map(key => [key, true]));
contains(["apple","grape"], main) // => true
contains(["apple","banana","pineapple"], main) // => true
contains(["grape", "pineapple"], main) // => false
includes(["apple", "grape"], main) // => false
includes(["banana", "apple"], main) // => true
you can face with some disadvantage of checking by in operator (eg 'toString' in {} // => true), so you can change solution to obj[key] checker

Adding to Array Prototype
Disclaimer: Many would strongly advise against this. The only time it'd really be a problem was if a library added a prototype function with the same name (that behaved differently) or something like that.
Code:
Array.prototype.containsAny = function(arr) {
return this.some(
(v) => (arr.indexOf(v) >= 0)
)
}
Without using big arrow functions:
Array.prototype.containsAny = function(arr) {
return this.some(function (v) {
return arr.indexOf(v) >= 0
})
}
Usage
var a = ["a","b"]
console.log(a.containsAny(["b","z"])) // Outputs true
console.log(a.containsAny(["z"])) // Outputs false

My solution applies Array.prototype.some() and Array.prototype.includes() array helpers which do their job pretty efficient as well
ES6
const originalFruits = ["apple","banana","orange"];
const fruits1 = ["apple","banana","pineapple"];
const fruits2 = ["grape", "pineapple"];
const commonFruits = (myFruitsArr, otherFruitsArr) => {
return myFruitsArr.some(fruit => otherFruitsArr.includes(fruit))
}
console.log(commonFruits(originalFruits, fruits1)) //returns true;
console.log(commonFruits(originalFruits, fruits2)) //returns false;

When I looked at your answers, I could not find the answer I wanted.
I did something myself and I want to share this with you.
It will be true only if the words entered (array) are correct.
function contains(a,b) {
let counter = 0;
for(var i = 0; i < b.length; i++) {;
if(a.includes(b[i])) counter++;
}
if(counter === b.length) return true;
return false;
}
let main_array = ['foo','bar','baz'];
let sub_array_a = ['foo','foobar'];
let sub_array_b = ['foo','bar'];
console.log(contains(main_array, sub_array_a)); // returns false
console.log(contains(main_array,sub_array_b )); // returns true

Array .filter() with a nested call to .find() will return all elements in the first array that are members of the second array. Check the length of the returned array to determine if any of the second array were in the first array.
getCommonItems(firstArray, secondArray) {
return firstArray.filter((firstArrayItem) => {
return secondArray.find((secondArrayItem) => {
return firstArrayItem === secondArrayItem;
});
});
}

It can be done by simply iterating across the main array and check whether other array contains any of the target element or not.
Try this:
function Check(A) {
var myarr = ["apple", "banana", "orange"];
var i, j;
var totalmatches = 0;
for (i = 0; i < myarr.length; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < A.length; ++j) {
if (myarr[i] == A[j]) {
totalmatches++;
}
}
}
if (totalmatches > 0) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
var fruits1 = new Array("apple", "grape");
alert(Check(fruits1));
var fruits2 = new Array("apple", "banana", "pineapple");
alert(Check(fruits2));
var fruits3 = new Array("grape", "pineapple");
alert(Check(fruits3));
DEMO at JSFIDDLE

Not sure how efficient this might be in terms of performance, but this is what I use using array destructuring to keep everything nice and short:
const shareElements = (arr1, arr2) => {
const typeArr = [...arr1, ...arr2]
const typeSet = new Set(typeArr)
return typeArr.length > typeSet.size
}
Since sets cannot have duplicate elements while arrays can, combining both input arrays, converting it to a set, and comparing the set size and array length would tell you if they share any elements.

With underscorejs
var a1 = [1,2,3];
var a2 = [1,2];
_.every(a1, function(e){ return _.include(a2, e); } ); //=> false
_.every(a2, function(e){ return _.include(a1, e); } ); //=> true

Vanilla JS with partial matching & case insensitive
The problem with some previous approaches is that they require an exact match of every word. But, What if you want to provide results for partial matches?
function search(arrayToSearch, wordsToSearch) {
arrayToSearch.filter(v =>
wordsToSearch.every(w =>
v.toLowerCase().split(" ").
reduce((isIn, h) => isIn || String(h).indexOf(w) >= 0, false)
)
)
}
//Usage
var myArray = ["Attach tag", "Attaching tags", "Blah blah blah"];
var searchText = "Tag attach";
var searchArr = searchText.toLowerCase().split(" "); //["tag", "attach"]
var matches = search(myArray, searchArr);
//Will return
//["Attach tag", "Attaching tags"]
This is useful when you want to provide a search box where users type words and the results can have those words in any order, position and case.

Update #Paul Grimshaw answer, use includes insteed of indexOf for more readable
let found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.indexOf(r) >= 0)
let found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.includes(r))

A short way of writing this:
const found = arr1.some(arr2.includes)

I came up with a solution in node using underscore js like this:
var checkRole = _.intersection(['A','B'], ['A','B','C']);
if(!_.isEmpty(checkRole)) {
next();
}

You are looking for intersection between the two arrays. And you have two major intersection types: 'every' and 'some'. Let me give you good examples:
EVERY
let brands1 = ['Ford', 'Kia', 'VW', 'Audi'];
let brands2 = ['Audi', 'Kia'];
// Find 'every' brand intersection.
// Meaning all elements inside 'brands2' must be present in 'brands1':
let intersectionEvery = brands2.every( brand => brands1.includes(brand) );
if (intersectionEvery) {
const differenceList = brands1.filter(brand => !brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('difference list:', differenceList);
const commonList = brands1.filter(brand => brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('common list:', commonList);
}
If condition is not met (like if you put 'Mercedes' in brands2) then 'intersectionEvery' won't be satisfied - will be bool false.
If condition is met it will log ["Ford", "VW"] as difference and ["Kia", "Audi"] as common list.
Sandbox: https://jsfiddle.net/bqmg14t6/
SOME
let brands1 = ['Ford', 'Kia', 'VW', 'Audi'];
let brands2 = ['Audi', 'Kia', 'Mercedes', 'Land Rover'];
// Find 'some' brand intersection.
// Meaning some elements inside 'brands2' must be also present in 'brands1':
let intersectionSome = brands2.some( brand => brands1.includes(brand) );
if (intersectionSome) {
const differenceList = brands1.filter(brand => !brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('difference list:', differenceList);
const commonList = brands1.filter(brand => brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('common list:', commonList);
}
Here we are looking for some common brands, not necessarily all.
It will log ["Ford", "VW"] as difference and ["Kia", "Audi"] as common brands.
Sandbox: https://jsfiddle.net/zkq9j3Lh/

Personally, I would use the following function:
var arrayContains = function(array, toMatch) {
var arrayAsString = array.toString();
return (arrayAsString.indexOf(','+toMatch+',') >-1);
}
The "toString()" method will always use commas to separate the values. Will only really work with primitive types.

console.log("searching Array: "+finding_array);
console.log("searching in:"+reference_array);
var check_match_counter = 0;
for (var j = finding_array.length - 1; j >= 0; j--)
{
if(reference_array.indexOf(finding_array[j]) > 0)
{
check_match_counter = check_match_counter + 1;
}
}
var match = (check_match_counter > 0) ? true : false;
console.log("Final result:"+match);

How to filter an array for a complete match? [duplicate]

I want a function that returns true if and only if a given array includes all the elements of a given "target" array. As follows.
const target = [ 1, 2, 3, ];
const array1 = [ 1, 2, 3, ]; // true
const array2 = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, ]; // true
const array3 = [ 1, 2, ]; // false
How can I accomplish the above result?

You can combine the .every() and .includes() methods:
let array1 = [1,2,3],
array2 = [1,2,3,4],
array3 = [1,2];
let checker = (arr, target) => target.every(v => arr.includes(v));
console.log(checker(array2, array1)); // true
console.log(checker(array3, array1)); // false

The every() method tests whether all elements in the array pass the test implemented by the provided function. It returns a Boolean value. Stands to reason that if you call every() on the original array and supply to it a function that checks if every element in the original array is contained in another array, you will get your answer. As such:
const ar1 = ['a', 'b'];
const ar2 = ['c', 'd', 'a', 'z', 'g', 'b'];
if(ar1.every(r => ar2.includes(r))){
console.log('Found all of', ar1, 'in', ar2);
}else{
console.log('Did not find all of', ar1, 'in', ar2);
}

You can try with Array.prototype.every():
The every() method tests whether all elements in the array pass the test implemented by the provided function.
and Array.prototype.includes():
The includes() method determines whether an array includes a certain element, returning true or false as appropriate.
var mainArr = [1,2,3];
function isTrue(arr, arr2){
return arr.every(i => arr2.includes(i));
}
console.log(isTrue(mainArr, [1,2,3]));
console.log(isTrue(mainArr, [1,2,3,4]));
console.log(isTrue(mainArr, [1,2]));

I used Purely Javascript.
function checkElementsinArray(fixedArray,inputArray)
{
var fixedArraylen = fixedArray.length;
var inputArraylen = inputArray.length;
if(fixedArraylen<=inputArraylen)
{
for(var i=0;i<fixedArraylen;i++)
{
if(!(inputArray.indexOf(fixedArray[i])>=0))
{
return false;
}
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
console.log(checkElementsinArray([1,2,3], [1,2,3]));
console.log(checkElementsinArray([1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]));
console.log(checkElementsinArray([1,2,3], [1,2]));

If you are using ES5, then you can simply do this.
targetArray =[1,2,3];
array1 = [1,2,3]; //return true
array2 = [1,2,3,4]; //return true
array3 = [1,2] //return false
console.log(targetArray.every(function(val) { return array1.indexOf(val) >= 0; })); //true
console.log(targetArray.every(function(val) { return array2.indexOf(val) >= 0; })); // true
console.log(targetArray.every(function(val) { return array3.indexOf(val) >= 0; }));// false

reduce can be used here as well (but it has O = (N * M) difficulty):
const result = target.reduce((acc, el) => {
return acc && array.includes(el)
}, true);
To solve this in more efficient way(O = N + M):
const myMap = new Map();
array.forEach(element => myMap.set(element);
const result = target.reduce((acc, el) => {
return acc && myMap.has(el)
}, true);

If you're checking if array x contains everything in array y, including requiring multiple occurrences of elements in y to appear multiple times in x:
function arrayContains(x,y) {
// returns true if array x contains all elements in array y
return !x.reduce((y,e,t)=>
(t=y.indexOf(e),t>=0&&y.splice(t,1),y),[...y]).length
}
console.log(arrayContains([1,2,3], [1,5])) // false - no 5 present
console.log(arrayContains([1,2,3], [1,2])) // true
console.log(arrayContains([1,2,3], [1,2,2])) // false - not enough 2s
console.log(arrayContains([2,1,2,3], [2,2,1])) // true

Check if array contains all elements of another array

I want a function that returns true if and only if a given array includes all the elements of a given "target" array. As follows.
const target = [ 1, 2, 3, ];
const array1 = [ 1, 2, 3, ]; // true
const array2 = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, ]; // true
const array3 = [ 1, 2, ]; // false
How can I accomplish the above result?

You can combine the .every() and .includes() methods:
let array1 = [1,2,3],
array2 = [1,2,3,4],
array3 = [1,2];
let checker = (arr, target) => target.every(v => arr.includes(v));
console.log(checker(array2, array1)); // true
console.log(checker(array3, array1)); // false

The every() method tests whether all elements in the array pass the test implemented by the provided function. It returns a Boolean value. Stands to reason that if you call every() on the original array and supply to it a function that checks if every element in the original array is contained in another array, you will get your answer. As such:
const ar1 = ['a', 'b'];
const ar2 = ['c', 'd', 'a', 'z', 'g', 'b'];
if(ar1.every(r => ar2.includes(r))){
console.log('Found all of', ar1, 'in', ar2);
}else{
console.log('Did not find all of', ar1, 'in', ar2);
}

You can try with Array.prototype.every():
The every() method tests whether all elements in the array pass the test implemented by the provided function.
and Array.prototype.includes():
The includes() method determines whether an array includes a certain element, returning true or false as appropriate.
var mainArr = [1,2,3];
function isTrue(arr, arr2){
return arr.every(i => arr2.includes(i));
}
console.log(isTrue(mainArr, [1,2,3]));
console.log(isTrue(mainArr, [1,2,3,4]));
console.log(isTrue(mainArr, [1,2]));

I used Purely Javascript.
function checkElementsinArray(fixedArray,inputArray)
{
var fixedArraylen = fixedArray.length;
var inputArraylen = inputArray.length;
if(fixedArraylen<=inputArraylen)
{
for(var i=0;i<fixedArraylen;i++)
{
if(!(inputArray.indexOf(fixedArray[i])>=0))
{
return false;
}
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
console.log(checkElementsinArray([1,2,3], [1,2,3]));
console.log(checkElementsinArray([1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]));
console.log(checkElementsinArray([1,2,3], [1,2]));

If you are using ES5, then you can simply do this.
targetArray =[1,2,3];
array1 = [1,2,3]; //return true
array2 = [1,2,3,4]; //return true
array3 = [1,2] //return false
console.log(targetArray.every(function(val) { return array1.indexOf(val) >= 0; })); //true
console.log(targetArray.every(function(val) { return array2.indexOf(val) >= 0; })); // true
console.log(targetArray.every(function(val) { return array3.indexOf(val) >= 0; }));// false

reduce can be used here as well (but it has O = (N * M) difficulty):
const result = target.reduce((acc, el) => {
return acc && array.includes(el)
}, true);
To solve this in more efficient way(O = N + M):
const myMap = new Map();
array.forEach(element => myMap.set(element);
const result = target.reduce((acc, el) => {
return acc && myMap.has(el)
}, true);

If you're checking if array x contains everything in array y, including requiring multiple occurrences of elements in y to appear multiple times in x:
function arrayContains(x,y) {
// returns true if array x contains all elements in array y
return !x.reduce((y,e,t)=>
(t=y.indexOf(e),t>=0&&y.splice(t,1),y),[...y]).length
}
console.log(arrayContains([1,2,3], [1,5])) // false - no 5 present
console.log(arrayContains([1,2,3], [1,2])) // true
console.log(arrayContains([1,2,3], [1,2,2])) // false - not enough 2s
console.log(arrayContains([2,1,2,3], [2,2,1])) // true

Check if an array contains any element of another array in JavaScript

I have a target array ["apple","banana","orange"], and I want to check if other arrays contain any one of the target array elements.
For example:
["apple","grape"] //returns true;
["apple","banana","pineapple"] //returns true;
["grape", "pineapple"] //returns false;
How can I do it in JavaScript?

Vanilla JS
ES2016:
const found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.includes(r))
ES6:
const found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.indexOf(r) >= 0)
How it works
some(..) checks each element of the array against a test function and returns true if any element of the array passes the test function, otherwise, it returns false. indexOf(..) >= 0 and includes(..) both return true if the given argument is present in the array.

vanilla js
/**
* #description determine if an array contains one or more items from another array.
* #param {array} haystack the array to search.
* #param {array} arr the array providing items to check for in the haystack.
* #return {boolean} true|false if haystack contains at least one item from arr.
*/
var findOne = function (haystack, arr) {
return arr.some(function (v) {
return haystack.indexOf(v) >= 0;
});
};
As noted by #loganfsmyth you can shorten it in ES2016 to
/**
* #description determine if an array contains one or more items from another array.
* #param {array} haystack the array to search.
* #param {array} arr the array providing items to check for in the haystack.
* #return {boolean} true|false if haystack contains at least one item from arr.
*/
const findOne = (haystack, arr) => {
return arr.some(v => haystack.includes(v));
};
or simply as arr.some(v => haystack.includes(v));
If you want to determine if the array has all the items from the other array, replace some() to every()
or as arr.every(v => haystack.includes(v));

ES6 solution:
let arr1 = [1, 2, 3];
let arr2 = [2, 3];
let isFounded = arr1.some( ai => arr2.includes(ai) );
Unlike of it: Must contains all values.
let allFounded = arr2.every( ai => arr1.includes(ai) );
Hope, will be helpful.

If you're not opposed to using a libray, http://underscorejs.org/ has an intersection method, which can simplify this:
var _ = require('underscore');
var target = [ 'apple', 'orange', 'banana'];
var fruit2 = [ 'apple', 'orange', 'mango'];
var fruit3 = [ 'mango', 'lemon', 'pineapple'];
var fruit4 = [ 'orange', 'lemon', 'grapes'];
console.log(_.intersection(target, fruit2)); //returns [apple, orange]
console.log(_.intersection(target, fruit3)); //returns []
console.log(_.intersection(target, fruit4)); //returns [orange]
The intersection function will return a new array with the items that it matched and if not matches it returns empty array.

ES6 (fastest)
const a = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
const b = ['c', 'a', 'd'];
a.some(v=> b.indexOf(v) !== -1)
ES2016
const a = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
const b = ['c', 'a', 'd'];
a.some(v => b.includes(v));
Underscore
const a = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
const b = ['c', 'a', 'd'];
_.intersection(a, b)
DEMO: https://jsfiddle.net/r257wuv5/
jsPerf: https://jsperf.com/array-contains-any-element-of-another-array

If you don't need type coercion (because of the use of indexOf), you could try something like the following:
var arr = [1, 2, 3];
var check = [3, 4];
var found = false;
for (var i = 0; i < check.length; i++) {
if (arr.indexOf(check[i]) > -1) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
console.log(found);
Where arr contains the target items. At the end, found will show if the second array had at least one match against the target.
Of course, you can swap out numbers for anything you want to use - strings are fine, like your example.
And in my specific example, the result should be true because the second array's 3 exists in the target.
UPDATE:
Here's how I'd organize it into a function (with some minor changes from before):
var anyMatchInArray = (function () {
"use strict";
var targetArray, func;
targetArray = ["apple", "banana", "orange"];
func = function (checkerArray) {
var found = false;
for (var i = 0, j = checkerArray.length; !found && i < j; i++) {
if (targetArray.indexOf(checkerArray[i]) > -1) {
found = true;
}
}
return found;
};
return func;
}());
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/u8Bzt/
In this case, the function could be modified to have targetArray be passed in as an argument instead of hardcoded in the closure.
UPDATE2:
While my solution above may work and be (hopefully more) readable, I believe the "better" way to handle the concept I described is to do something a little differently. The "problem" with the above solution is that the indexOf inside the loop causes the target array to be looped over completely for every item in the other array. This can easily be "fixed" by using a "lookup" (a map...a JavaScript object literal). This allows two simple loops, over each array. Here's an example:
var anyMatchInArray = function (target, toMatch) {
"use strict";
var found, targetMap, i, j, cur;
found = false;
targetMap = {};
// Put all values in the `target` array into a map, where
// the keys are the values from the array
for (i = 0, j = target.length; i < j; i++) {
cur = target[i];
targetMap[cur] = true;
}
// Loop over all items in the `toMatch` array and see if any of
// their values are in the map from before
for (i = 0, j = toMatch.length; !found && (i < j); i++) {
cur = toMatch[i];
found = !!targetMap[cur];
// If found, `targetMap[cur]` will return true, otherwise it
// will return `undefined`...that's what the `!!` is for
}
return found;
};
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/5Lv9v/
The downside to this solution is that only numbers and strings (and booleans) can be used (correctly), because the values are (implicitly) converted to strings and set as the keys to the lookup map. This isn't exactly good/possible/easily done for non-literal values.

Using filter/indexOf:
function containsAny(source,target)
{
var result = source.filter(function(item){ return target.indexOf(item) > -1});
return (result.length > 0);
}
//results
var fruits = ["apple","banana","orange"];
console.log(containsAny(fruits,["apple","grape"]));
console.log(containsAny(fruits,["apple","banana","pineapple"]));
console.log(containsAny(fruits,["grape", "pineapple"]));

You could use lodash and do:
_.intersection(originalTarget, arrayToCheck).length > 0
Set intersection is done on both collections producing an array of identical elements.

const areCommonElements = (arr1, arr2) => {
const arr2Set = new Set(arr2);
return arr1.some(el => arr2Set.has(el));
};
Or you can even have a better performance if you first find out which of these two arrays is longer and making Set out for the longest array, while applying some method on the shortest one:
const areCommonElements = (arr1, arr2) => {
const [shortArr, longArr] = (arr1.length < arr2.length) ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
const longArrSet = new Set(longArr);
return shortArr.some(el => longArrSet.has(el));
};

I wrote 3 solutions. Essentially they do the same. They return true as soon as they get true. I wrote the 3 solutions just for showing 3 different way to do things. Now, it depends what you like more. You can use performance.now() to check the performance of one solution or the other. In my solutions I'm also checking which array is the biggest and which one is the smallest to make the operations more efficient.
The 3rd solution may not be the cutest but is efficient. I decided to add it because in some coding interviews you are not allowed to use built-in methods.
Lastly, sure...we can come up with a solution with 2 NESTED for loops (the brute force way) but you want to avoid that because the time complexity is bad O(n^2).
Note:
instead of using .includes() like some other people did, you can use
.indexOf(). if you do just check if the value is bigger than 0. If
the value doesn't exist will give you -1. if it does exist, it will give you
greater than 0.
indexOf() vs includes()
Which one has better performance? indexOf() for a little bit, but includes is more readable in my opinion.
If I'm not mistaken .includes() and indexOf() use loops behind the scene, so you will be at O(n^2) when using them with .some().
USING loop
const compareArraysWithIncludes = (arr1, arr2) => {
const [smallArray, bigArray] =
arr1.length < arr2.length ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
for (let i = 0; i < smallArray.length; i++) {
return bigArray.includes(smallArray[i]);
}
return false;
};
USING .some()
const compareArraysWithSome = (arr1, arr2) => {
const [smallArray, bigArray] =
arr1.length < arr2.length ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
return smallArray.some(c => bigArray.includes(c));
};
USING MAPS Time complexity O(2n)=>O(n)
const compararArraysUsingObjs = (arr1, arr2) => {
const map = {};
const [smallArray, bigArray] =
arr1.length < arr2.length ? [arr1, arr2] : [arr2, arr1];
for (let i = 0; i < smallArray.length; i++) {
if (!map[smallArray[i]]) {
map[smallArray[i]] = true;
}
}
for (let i = 0; i < bigArray.length; i++) {
if (map[bigArray[i]]) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
};
Code in my:
stackblitz
I'm not an expert in performance nor BigO so if something that I said is wrong let me know.

You can use a nested Array.prototype.some call. This has the benefit that it will bail at the first match instead of other solutions that will run through the full nested loop.
eg.
var arr = [1, 2, 3];
var match = [2, 4];
var hasMatch = arr.some(a => match.some(m => a === m));

I found this short and sweet syntax to match all or some elements between two arrays. For example
// OR operation. find if any of array2 elements exists in array1. This will return as soon as there is a first match as some method breaks when function returns TRUE
let array1 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'], array2 = ['a', 'b'];
console.log(array2.some(ele => array1.includes(ele)));
// prints TRUE
// AND operation. find if all of array2 elements exists in array1. This will return as soon as there is a no first match as some method breaks when function returns TRUE
let array1 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'], array2 = ['a', 'x'];
console.log(!array2.some(ele => !array1.includes(ele)));
// prints FALSE
Hope that helps someone in future!

Just one more solution
var a1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
var a2 = [2, 4]
Check if a1 contain all element of a2
var result = a1.filter(e => a2.indexOf(e) !== -1).length === a2.length
console.log(result)

What about using a combination of some/findIndex and indexOf?
So something like this:
var array1 = ["apple","banana","orange"];
var array2 = ["grape", "pineapple"];
var found = array1.some(function(v) { return array2.indexOf(v) != -1; });
To make it more readable you could add this functionality to the Array object itself.
Array.prototype.indexOfAny = function (array) {
return this.findIndex(function(v) { return array.indexOf(v) != -1; });
}
Array.prototype.containsAny = function (array) {
return this.indexOfAny(array) != -1;
}
Note: If you'd want to do something with a predicate you could replace the inner indexOf with another findIndex and a predicate

Here is an interesting case I thought I should share.
Let's say that you have an array of objects and an array of selected filters.
let arr = [
{ id: 'x', tags: ['foo'] },
{ id: 'y', tags: ['foo', 'bar'] },
{ id: 'z', tags: ['baz'] }
];
const filters = ['foo'];
To apply the selected filters to this structure we can
if (filters.length > 0)
arr = arr.filter(obj =>
obj.tags.some(tag => filters.includes(tag))
);
// [
// { id: 'x', tags: ['foo'] },
// { id: 'y', tags: ['foo', 'bar'] }
// ]

Good perfomance solution:
We should transform one of arrays to object.
const contains = (arr1, mainObj) => arr1.some(el => el in mainObj);
const includes = (arr1, mainObj) => arr1.every(el => el in mainObj);
Usage:
const mainList = ["apple", "banana", "orange"];
// We make object from array, you can use your solution to make it
const main = Object.fromEntries(mainList.map(key => [key, true]));
contains(["apple","grape"], main) // => true
contains(["apple","banana","pineapple"], main) // => true
contains(["grape", "pineapple"], main) // => false
includes(["apple", "grape"], main) // => false
includes(["banana", "apple"], main) // => true
you can face with some disadvantage of checking by in operator (eg 'toString' in {} // => true), so you can change solution to obj[key] checker

Adding to Array Prototype
Disclaimer: Many would strongly advise against this. The only time it'd really be a problem was if a library added a prototype function with the same name (that behaved differently) or something like that.
Code:
Array.prototype.containsAny = function(arr) {
return this.some(
(v) => (arr.indexOf(v) >= 0)
)
}
Without using big arrow functions:
Array.prototype.containsAny = function(arr) {
return this.some(function (v) {
return arr.indexOf(v) >= 0
})
}
Usage
var a = ["a","b"]
console.log(a.containsAny(["b","z"])) // Outputs true
console.log(a.containsAny(["z"])) // Outputs false

My solution applies Array.prototype.some() and Array.prototype.includes() array helpers which do their job pretty efficient as well
ES6
const originalFruits = ["apple","banana","orange"];
const fruits1 = ["apple","banana","pineapple"];
const fruits2 = ["grape", "pineapple"];
const commonFruits = (myFruitsArr, otherFruitsArr) => {
return myFruitsArr.some(fruit => otherFruitsArr.includes(fruit))
}
console.log(commonFruits(originalFruits, fruits1)) //returns true;
console.log(commonFruits(originalFruits, fruits2)) //returns false;

When I looked at your answers, I could not find the answer I wanted.
I did something myself and I want to share this with you.
It will be true only if the words entered (array) are correct.
function contains(a,b) {
let counter = 0;
for(var i = 0; i < b.length; i++) {;
if(a.includes(b[i])) counter++;
}
if(counter === b.length) return true;
return false;
}
let main_array = ['foo','bar','baz'];
let sub_array_a = ['foo','foobar'];
let sub_array_b = ['foo','bar'];
console.log(contains(main_array, sub_array_a)); // returns false
console.log(contains(main_array,sub_array_b )); // returns true

Array .filter() with a nested call to .find() will return all elements in the first array that are members of the second array. Check the length of the returned array to determine if any of the second array were in the first array.
getCommonItems(firstArray, secondArray) {
return firstArray.filter((firstArrayItem) => {
return secondArray.find((secondArrayItem) => {
return firstArrayItem === secondArrayItem;
});
});
}

It can be done by simply iterating across the main array and check whether other array contains any of the target element or not.
Try this:
function Check(A) {
var myarr = ["apple", "banana", "orange"];
var i, j;
var totalmatches = 0;
for (i = 0; i < myarr.length; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < A.length; ++j) {
if (myarr[i] == A[j]) {
totalmatches++;
}
}
}
if (totalmatches > 0) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
var fruits1 = new Array("apple", "grape");
alert(Check(fruits1));
var fruits2 = new Array("apple", "banana", "pineapple");
alert(Check(fruits2));
var fruits3 = new Array("grape", "pineapple");
alert(Check(fruits3));
DEMO at JSFIDDLE

Not sure how efficient this might be in terms of performance, but this is what I use using array destructuring to keep everything nice and short:
const shareElements = (arr1, arr2) => {
const typeArr = [...arr1, ...arr2]
const typeSet = new Set(typeArr)
return typeArr.length > typeSet.size
}
Since sets cannot have duplicate elements while arrays can, combining both input arrays, converting it to a set, and comparing the set size and array length would tell you if they share any elements.

A short way of writing this:
const found = arr1.some(arr2.includes)

With underscorejs
var a1 = [1,2,3];
var a2 = [1,2];
_.every(a1, function(e){ return _.include(a2, e); } ); //=> false
_.every(a2, function(e){ return _.include(a1, e); } ); //=> true

Vanilla JS with partial matching & case insensitive
The problem with some previous approaches is that they require an exact match of every word. But, What if you want to provide results for partial matches?
function search(arrayToSearch, wordsToSearch) {
arrayToSearch.filter(v =>
wordsToSearch.every(w =>
v.toLowerCase().split(" ").
reduce((isIn, h) => isIn || String(h).indexOf(w) >= 0, false)
)
)
}
//Usage
var myArray = ["Attach tag", "Attaching tags", "Blah blah blah"];
var searchText = "Tag attach";
var searchArr = searchText.toLowerCase().split(" "); //["tag", "attach"]
var matches = search(myArray, searchArr);
//Will return
//["Attach tag", "Attaching tags"]
This is useful when you want to provide a search box where users type words and the results can have those words in any order, position and case.

Update #Paul Grimshaw answer, use includes insteed of indexOf for more readable
let found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.indexOf(r) >= 0)
let found = arr1.some(r=> arr2.includes(r))

I came up with a solution in node using underscore js like this:
var checkRole = _.intersection(['A','B'], ['A','B','C']);
if(!_.isEmpty(checkRole)) {
next();
}

You are looking for intersection between the two arrays. And you have two major intersection types: 'every' and 'some'. Let me give you good examples:
EVERY
let brands1 = ['Ford', 'Kia', 'VW', 'Audi'];
let brands2 = ['Audi', 'Kia'];
// Find 'every' brand intersection.
// Meaning all elements inside 'brands2' must be present in 'brands1':
let intersectionEvery = brands2.every( brand => brands1.includes(brand) );
if (intersectionEvery) {
const differenceList = brands1.filter(brand => !brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('difference list:', differenceList);
const commonList = brands1.filter(brand => brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('common list:', commonList);
}
If condition is not met (like if you put 'Mercedes' in brands2) then 'intersectionEvery' won't be satisfied - will be bool false.
If condition is met it will log ["Ford", "VW"] as difference and ["Kia", "Audi"] as common list.
Sandbox: https://jsfiddle.net/bqmg14t6/
SOME
let brands1 = ['Ford', 'Kia', 'VW', 'Audi'];
let brands2 = ['Audi', 'Kia', 'Mercedes', 'Land Rover'];
// Find 'some' brand intersection.
// Meaning some elements inside 'brands2' must be also present in 'brands1':
let intersectionSome = brands2.some( brand => brands1.includes(brand) );
if (intersectionSome) {
const differenceList = brands1.filter(brand => !brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('difference list:', differenceList);
const commonList = brands1.filter(brand => brands2.includes(brand));
console.log('common list:', commonList);
}
Here we are looking for some common brands, not necessarily all.
It will log ["Ford", "VW"] as difference and ["Kia", "Audi"] as common brands.
Sandbox: https://jsfiddle.net/zkq9j3Lh/

Personally, I would use the following function:
var arrayContains = function(array, toMatch) {
var arrayAsString = array.toString();
return (arrayAsString.indexOf(','+toMatch+',') >-1);
}
The "toString()" method will always use commas to separate the values. Will only really work with primitive types.

console.log("searching Array: "+finding_array);
console.log("searching in:"+reference_array);
var check_match_counter = 0;
for (var j = finding_array.length - 1; j >= 0; j--)
{
if(reference_array.indexOf(finding_array[j]) > 0)
{
check_match_counter = check_match_counter + 1;
}
}
var match = (check_match_counter > 0) ? true : false;
console.log("Final result:"+match);

Check if all values of array are equal

I need to find arrays where all values are equal. What's the fastest way to do this? Should I loop through it and just compare values?
['a', 'a', 'a', 'a'] // true
['a', 'a', 'b', 'a'] // false

const allEqual = arr => arr.every( v => v === arr[0] )
allEqual( [1,1,1,1] ) // true
Or one-liner:
[1,1,1,1].every( (val, i, arr) => val === arr[0] ) // true
Array.prototype.every (from MDN) :
The every() method tests whether all elements in the array pass the test implemented by the provided function.

Edit: Be a Red ninja:
!!array.reduce(function(a, b){ return (a === b) ? a : NaN; });
Results:
var array = ["a", "a", "a"] => result: "true"
var array = ["a", "b", "a"] => result: "false"
var array = ["false", ""] => result: "false"
var array = ["false", false] => result: "false"
var array = ["false", "false"] => result: "true"
var array = [NaN, NaN] => result: "false"
Warning:
var array = [] => result: TypeError thrown
This is because we do not pass an initialValue. So, you may wish to check array.length first.

You can turn the Array into a Set. If the size of the Set is equal to 1, then all elements of the Array are equal.
function allEqual(arr) {
return new Set(arr).size == 1;
}
allEqual(['a', 'a', 'a', 'a']); // true
allEqual(['a', 'a', 'b', 'a']); // false

This works. You create a method on Array by using prototype.
if (Array.prototype.allValuesSame === undefined) {
Array.prototype.allValuesSame = function() {
for (let i = 1; i < this.length; i++) {
if (this[i] !== this[0]) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
Call this in this way:
let a = ['a', 'a', 'a'];
let b = a.allValuesSame(); // true
a = ['a', 'b', 'a'];
b = a.allValuesSame(); // false

In JavaScript 1.6, you can use Array.every:
function AllTheSame(array) {
var first = array[0];
return array.every(function(element) {
return element === first;
});
}
You probably need some sanity checks, e.g. when the array has no elements. (Also, this won't work when all elements are NaN since NaN !== NaN, but that shouldn't be an issue... right?)

And for performance comparison I also did a benchmark:
function allAreEqual(array){
if(!array.length) return true;
// I also made sure it works with [false, false] array
return array.reduce(function(a, b){return (a === b)?a:(!b);}) === array[0];
}
function same(a) {
if (!a.length) return true;
return !a.filter(function (e) {
return e !== a[0];
}).length;
}
function allTheSame(array) {
var first = array[0];
return array.every(function(element) {
return element === first;
});
}
function useSome(array){
return !array.some(function(value, index, array){
return value !== array[0];
});
}
Results:
allAreEqual x 47,565 ops/sec ±0.16% (100 runs sampled)
same x 42,529 ops/sec ±1.74% (92 runs sampled)
allTheSame x 66,437 ops/sec ±0.45% (102 runs sampled)
useSome x 70,102 ops/sec ±0.27% (100 runs sampled)
So apparently using builtin array.some() is the fastest method of the ones sampled.

update 2022 version: use Set()
let a = ['a', 'a', 'b', 'a'];
let b = ['a', 'a', 'a', 'a'];
const check = (list) => {
const setItem = new Set(list);
return setItem.size <= 1;
}
const checkShort = (list) => (new Set(list)).size <= 1
check(a); // false;
check(b); // true;
checkShort(a); // false
checkShort(b); // true
Update new solution: check index
let a = ['a', 'a', 'b', 'a'];
let b = ['a', 'a', 'a', 'a'];
let check = (list) => list.every(item => list.indexOf(item) === 0);
check(a); // false;
check(b); // true;
Updated with ES6:
Use list.every is the fastest way:
let a = ['a', 'a', 'b', 'a'];
let check = (list) => list.every(item => item === list[0]);
old version:
var listTrue = ['a', 'a', 'a', 'a'];
var listFalse = ['a', 'a', 'a', 'ab'];
function areWeTheSame(list) {
var sample = list[0];
return (list.every((item) => item === sample));
}

If you're already using underscore.js, then here's another option using _.uniq:
function allEqual(arr) {
return _.uniq(arr).length === 1;
}
_.uniq returns a duplicate-free version of the array. If all the values are the same, then the length will be 1.
As mentioned in the comments, given that you may expect an empty array to return true, then you should also check for that case:
function allEqual(arr) {
return arr.length === 0 || _.uniq(arr).length === 1;
}

Shortest answer using underscore/lodash
function elementsEqual(arr) {
return !_.without(arr, arr[0]).length
}
spec:
elementsEqual(null) // throws error
elementsEqual([]) // true
elementsEqual({}) // true
elementsEqual([1]) // true
elementsEqual([1,2]) // false
elementsEqual(NaN) // true
edit:
Or even shorter, inspired by Tom's answer:
function elementsEqual2(arr) {
return _.uniq(arr).length <= 1;
}
spec:
elementsEqual2(null) // true (beware, it's different than above)
elementsEqual2([]) // true
elementsEqual2({}) // true
elementsEqual2([1]) // true
elementsEqual2([1,2]) // false
elementsEqual2(NaN) // true

every() function check if all elements of an array
const checkArr = a => a.every( val => val === a[0] )
checkArr(['a','a','a']) // true

You can use Array.every if supported:
var equals = array.every(function(value, index, array){
return value === array[0];
});
Alternatives approach of a loop could be something like sort
var temp = array.slice(0).sort();
var equals = temp[0] === temp[temp.length - 1];
Or, if the items are like the question, something dirty like:
var equals = array.join('').split(array[0]).join('').length === 0;
Also works.

Yes, you can check it also using filter as below, very simple, checking every values are the same as the first one:
//ES6
function sameValues(arr) {
return arr.filter((v,i,a)=>v===a[0]).length === arr.length;
}
also can be done using every method on the array:
//ES6
function sameValues(arr) {
return arr.every((v,i,a)=>v===a[0]);
}
and you can check your arrays like below:
sameValues(['a', 'a', 'a', 'a']); // true
sameValues(['a', 'a', 'b', 'a']); // false
Or you can add it to native Array functionalities in JavaScript if you reuse it a lot:
//ES6
Array.prototype.sameValues = Array.prototype.sameValues || function(){
this.every((v,i,a)=>v===a[0]);
}
and you can check your arrays like below:
['a', 'a', 'a', 'a'].sameValues(); // true
['a', 'a', 'b', 'a'].sameValues(); // false

You can get this one-liner to do what you want using Array.prototype.every, Object.is, and ES6 arrow functions:
const all = arr => arr.every(x => Object.is(arr[0], x));

Now you can make use of sets to do that easily.
let a= ['a', 'a', 'a', 'a']; // true
let b =['a', 'a', 'b', 'a'];// false
console.log(new Set(a).size === 1);
console.log(new Set(b).size === 1);

I think the simplest way to do this is to create a loop to compare the each value to the next. As long as there is a break in the "chain" then it would return false. If the first is equal to the second, the second equal to the third and so on, then we can conclude that all elements of the array are equal to each other.
given an array data[], then you can use:
for(x=0;x<data.length - 1;x++){
if (data[x] != data[x+1]){
isEqual = false;
}
}
alert("All elements are equal is " + isEqual);

You can convert array to a Set and check its size
In case of primitive array entries, i.e. number, string:
const isArrayWithEqualEntries = array => new Set(array).size === 1
In case of array of objects with some field to be tested for equivalence, say id:
const mapper = ({id}) => id
const isArrayWithEqualEntries = array => new Set(array.map(mapper)).size === 1

You can use this:
function same(a) {
if (!a.length) return true;
return !a.filter(function (e) {
return e !== a[0];
}).length;
}
The function first checks whether the array is empty. If it is it's values are equals..
Otherwise it filter the array and takes all elements which are different from the first one. If there are no such values => the array contains only equal elements otherwise it doesn't.

arr.length && arr.reduce(function(a, b){return (a === b)?a:false;}) === arr[0];

Its Simple.
Create a function and pass a parameter.
In that function copy the first index into a new variable.
Then Create a for loop and loop through the array.
Inside a loop create an while loop with a condition checking whether the new created variable is equal to all the elements in the loop.
if its equal return true after the for loop completes else return false inside the while loop.
function isUniform(arra){
var k=arra[0];
for (var i = 0; i < arra.length; i++) {
while(k!==arra[i]){
return false;
}
}
return true;
}

The accepted answer worked great but I wanted to add a tiny bit. It didn't work for me to use === because I was comparing arrays of arrays of objects, however throughout my app I've been using the fast-deep-equal package which I highly recommend. With that, my code looks like this:
let areAllEqual = arrs.every((val, i, arr) => equal(val, arr[0]) );
and my data looks like this:
[
[
{
"ID": 28,
"AuthorID": 121,
"VisitTypeID": 2
},
{
"ID": 115,
"AuthorID": 121,
"VisitTypeID": 1
},
{
"ID": 121,
"AuthorID": 121,
"VisitTypeID": 1
}
],
[
{
"ID": 121,
"AuthorID": 121,
"VisitTypeID": 1
}
],
[
{
"ID": 5,
"AuthorID": 121,
"VisitTypeID": 1
},
{
"ID": 121,
"AuthorID": 121,
"VisitTypeID": 1
}
]
]

You could use a for loop:
function isEqual(arr) {
var first = arr[0];
for (let i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (first !== arr[i]) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}

Underscore's _.isEqual(object, other) function seems to work well for arrays. The order of items in the array matter when it checks for equality. See http://underscorejs.org/#isEqual.

var listTrue = ['a', 'a', 'a', 'a'];
var listFalse = ['a', 'a', 'a', 'ab'];
function areWeTheSame(list) {
var sample = list[0];
return !(list.some(function(item) {
return !(item == sample);
}));
}

function isUniform(array) {
for (var i=1; i< array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] !== array[0]) { return false; }
}
for (var i=1; i< array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] === array[0]) { return true; }
}
}
For the first loop; whenever it detects uneven, returns "false"
The first loop runs, and if it returns false, we have "false"
When it's not return false, it means there will be true, so we do the second loop. And of course we will have "true" from the second loop (because the first loop found it's NOT false)

Create a string by joining the array.
Create string by repetition of the first character of the given array
match both strings
function checkArray(array){
return array.join("") == array[0].repeat(array.length);
}
console.log('array: [a,a,a,a]: ' + checkArray(['a', 'a', 'a', 'a']));
console.log('array: [a,a,b,a]: ' + checkArray(['a', 'a', 'b', 'a']));
And you are DONE !

Another interesting way when you use ES6 arrow function syntax:
x = ['a', 'a', 'a', 'a']
!x.filter(e=>e!==x[0])[0] // true
x = ['a', 'a', 'b', 'a']
!x.filter(e=>e!==x[0])[0] // false
x = []
!x.filter(e=>e!==x[0])[0] // true
And when you don't want to reuse the variable for array (x):
!['a', 'a', 'a', 'a'].filter((e,i,a)=>e!==a[0])[0] // true
IMO previous poster who used array.every(...) has the cleanest solution.

this might work , you can use the comment out code as well that also woks well with the given scenerio.
function isUniform(){
var arrayToMatch = [1,1,1,1,1];
var temp = arrayToMatch[0];
console.log(temp);
/* return arrayToMatch.every(function(check){
return check == temp;
});*/
var bool;
arrayToMatch.forEach(function(check){
bool=(check == temp);
})
console.log(bool);
}
isUniform();

Use index of operator for every item of array
to check if it exists or not. If even one item returns -1 (doesn't exist then it will be false)
nst arr1 = [1, 3, 5];
const arr2 = [5, 7, 9];
const arr3 = [1, 3, 5];
arr1.every(item => arr2.indexOf(item) != -1)
// this will return false
arr1.every(item => arr3.indexOf(item) != -1)
// this will return true

Simple one line solution, just compare it to an array filled with the first entry.
if(arr.join('') === Array(arr.length).fill(arr[0]).join(''))

**// Logical Solution:- Declare global array and one variable(To check the condition) whether all element of an array contains same value or not.**
var arr =[];
var isMatching = false;
for(var i=0;i<arr.length;i++){
if(String(arr[i]).toLowerCase()== "Your string to check"){
isMatching=true;
// Array has same value in all index of an array
}
else{
isMatching=false;
// Array Doesn't has same value in all index of an array
break;
}
}
// **Check isMatching variable is true or false**
if(isMatching){ // True
//If Array has same value in all index, then this block will get executed
}
else{ //False
//If Array doesn't has same value in all index, then this block will get executed
}