I'm trying to set up routes for my backend. I have two ways that I've tried setting these routes up, and I'm wondering which way fits best practices (or neither?). The differences are minimal, but I'd love to know if there is an objective "best" here.
Here are my attempts:
const express = require("express");
const router = express.Router();
const flashcardController = require('../controllers/flashcardController');
router.get('/', flashcardController.readFlashcard);
router.post('/', flashcardController.createFlashcard);
router.patch('/', flashcardController.updateFlashcard);
router.delete('/', flashcardController.deleteFlashcard);
module.exports = router
VS
const express = require("express");
const router = express.Router();
const flashcardController = require('../controllers/flashcardController');
module.exports = (app) => {
router.get('/api/flashcard', flashcardController.readFlashcard);
router.post('/api/flashcard', flashcardController.createFlashcard);
router.patch('/api/flashcard', flashcardController.updateFlashcard);
router.delete('/api/flashcard', flashcardController.deleteFlashcard);
app.use('/', router);
};
Of course, my app.js (entry-point for my backend) file will need to be coded slightly differently for each of these options.
If you believe that the job of a router is to just handle some requests that it receives and it is the job of the calling code to place the router at whatever path the calling code wants it to operate on, then only your first option will do that. This would allow a caller to use these routes in whatever path it wants.
If you want the module that implements the routes to be entirely self-sufficient and install the routes on the path it wants them to be on, then only the second option does that.
I would say that the "usual" and more "flexible" scheme is the first one where the caller places the routes on the path where it wants them. But, you are free to choose whichever style you want.
The second option is not implemented particularly efficiently so it could be improved. No router is needed at all as the routes can be just installed directly on the app object directly. And, repeating /api/flashcard multiple times can be avoided.
For example, the second option could be this:
const controller = require('../controllers/flashcardController');
const routePath = '/api/flashcard';
module.exports = (app) => {
app.get(routePath, controller.readFlashcard);
app.post(routePath, controller.createFlashcard);
app.patch(routePath, controller.updateFlashcard);
app.delete(routePath, controller.deleteFlashcard);
};
Or, even just this:
const controller = require('../controllers/flashcardController');
module.exports = (app) => {
app.route('/api/flashcard')
.get(controller.readFlashcard)
.post(controller.createFlashcard)
.patch(controller.updateFlashcard)
.delete(controller.deleteFlashcard);
};
And, the first one could be simplified to this:
const router = require("express").Router();
const controller = require('../controllers/flashcardController');
router.route('/')
.get(controller.readFlashcard)
.post(controller.createFlashcard)
.patch(controller.updateFlashcard)
.delete(controller.deleteFlashcard);
module.exports = router
Related
I want my routes to be like the following:
/
/business
/business/stuff1
/business/stuff2
/business/admin
for /business I want to have a separate file for the routing and functions.
and also for /business/admin I want to have a separate file for the routing and functions.
so what I did is:
app.js
//Business route
const business = require("./business/business");
app.use("/business", business);
This works fine - but when I add in business.js
//admin route
const admin = require("./admin");
app.use("/admin", admin);
I get 404 for some reason.
Depends on what you are exporing from business.js. It should be an instance of express.Router and you have to mount the /admin route on this instance. Example:
// business.js
const admin = require("./admin");
const businessApp = express.Router();
businessApp.use("/admin", admin);
module.exports = businessApp;
I'm working on a project with next.js and Reactjs that uses a lot of different languages. So I need to change the language url. Example:
www.example.com/es/entradas
www.example.com/en/tickets
www.example.com/de/eintrittskarten
To make routes I saw that there is a module that helps me: next-routes
https://github.com/fridays/next-routes
There are a lot of url and I'm working with a CMS, so my clients will be able to add more, so routes can't be harcoded. I thought to pass the url with queries, like this:
const routes = require('next-routes');
module.exports = routes()
.add('index', '/:lang?')
.add('tickets', '/:lang?/:ticket')
.add('hotel', '/:lang?/:hotel');
My surprise (as you might see), it doesn't work because routes doesn't see the difference between these two last routes. If I write:
www.example.com/en/tickets
It will go correctly to my page "tickets" but if I write
www.example.com/en/hotel
It will go again to my page "tickets" and not to "hotel"
Do you know any way about how could I make this?
In my project I have these files related about routes:
server.js
const next = require('next');
const { createServer } = require('http');
const routes = require('./routes');
const dev = process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production';
const app = next({ dir: './src/shared', dev });
const handle = routes.getRequestHandler(app);
app.prepare()
.then(() => {
createServer(handle)
.listen(3001, (err) => {
if (err) throw err;
console.log("> Ready on http://localhost:3001");
});
});
routes.js
const routes = require('next-routes');
module.exports = routes()
.add('index', '/:lang?')
.add('tickets', '/:lang?/:ticket')
.add('hotel', '/:lang?/:hotel');
The request for /en/hotel is going to the "ticket" route because it is actually matching it.
This is because of the : in front of the word "ticket" in the route. A : will turn a section of a route into a parameter with that name.
So instead what you probably want is:
module.exports = routes()
.add('index', '/:lang?')
.add('tickets', '/:lang?/ticket')
.add('hotel', '/:lang?/hotel');
I am still trying to fully understand how exporting and importing modules works in Nodejs.
I am using the following file to seed a mongodb database. This file runs exactly as it should and returns exactly the result I am expecting, when I execute it as a standalone file. My issue is I want to use this file in two different places in my app. So I am trying to make it an exportable/importable module. Here is what I have tried:
seed.js looks like this:
'use strict';
// library modules
const {ObjectID} = require('mongodb');
const seeder = require('mongoose-seed');
const jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
const util = require('util');
// local modules
const {Course} = require('./../models/course');
const {Review} = require('./../models/review');
const {User} = require('./../models/user');
const {data} = require('./../data/data.js');
const config = require('./../config/config.js');
/*==================================================
build seeding Courses, Reviews, Users
==================================================*/
// Connect to MongoDB via Mongoose
let seed = seeder.connect(process.env.MONGODB_URI, (e) => {
console.log(`Connected to: ${process.env.MONGODB_URI} and seeding files`);
// Load Mongoose models
seeder.loadModels([
'src/models/user.js',
'src/models/review.js',
'src/models/course.js'
]);
// Clear specified collections
seeder.clearModels(['User', 'Review', 'Course'], function() {
// Callback to populate DB once collections have been cleared
seeder.populateModels(data, function() {
seeder.disconnect();
});
});
});
module.exports = seed;
Within app.js I have these two lines
const seed = require('./middleware/seed');
and
app.use(seed);
I have also tried, to no avail
app.use(seed());
What is missing? I don't want to use the code in-line in two different places (DRY you know).
It is failing with this error:
throw new TypeError('app.use() requires a middleware function')
I am sorry about the formatting I thought I was using markdown, but I am clearly not.
You are executing your seeder function in that module and not returning any middleware function at all. Middleware is always a function and it has the form of:
const seed = function (req, res, next) {
...
next()
}
With what you have now, the best you can do is the following which will certainly seed your models when the module is loaded.
const seed = require('./middleware/seed');
Are you trying to run those two functions as middleware, on every request? In that case you'd do something like this:
const seed = function (req, res, next) {
seeder.connect(..., (e) => {
...
seeder.clearModels(..., ()=>{
...
next()
})
})
})
If you want to run that seeder code at the module level AND to expose it as middleware then wrap the current module level code in function and execute it when the module loads. Notice that the new function optionally handles the next callback if it receives it.
function doSeed(next){
//your code currently running at module level
if(next)
return next()
}
doSeed(); //run the code at the module level
const seed = (req, res, next) => doSeed(next))
module.exports = seed;
One way that I allow myself to have access to a variable in different instances is adding it to the process variable. In node.js no matter where in the project it is, it will always be the same. In some cases, I would do process.DB = seed(); which would allow process.DB to always be the result of that. So inside your main class you can do process.DB = seed(); and all of your other classes running off of that one main class would have access to process.DB keeping your database readily available.
So I try to make a full stack project. It has controllers like signup, login, profile etc.
What I do is I require each controller manually, then use them according to the request. For example, I will have
app.use('/signup',signup);
app.use('/login',login);
app.use('/profile',profile);
However, when I build up the complexity of the project,more controllers will be needed, but manually typing everything is not the best practice.
I want to have a more general form, just one line does all the work:
app.use('whatever the link i got',load the corresponding controller);
Maybe the solution will be in different form. How can I achieve this? I need some suggestions.
The simplest solution would probably be to put them all in a controllers directory and then just do this:
const controllers = readdirSync(path.join(__dirname, 'controllers'))
controllers.forEach(controller => {
app.use(`/${controller}`, require(`./controllers/${controller}`))
})
This works great, as long as your routes and controllers are named the same thing. If you need to deal with converting kebab to camel case, there's always lodash.
Assuming you're using express 4, you could take this one step further, and put an index.js in the controllers directory. Inside:
const express = require('express')
const router = express.Router()
const controllers = readdirSync(__dirname))
.filter(f => f !== 'index.js'))
controllers.forEach(controller => {
router.use(`/${controller}`, require(`./${controller}`))
})
module.exports = router
Then you can just use the router like this:
app.use('/', require('./controllers'))
Routing:
app.use('/cms/', require('./routes/index.js'));
app.use('/cms/schools/', require('./routes/schools.js'));
Routes:
/cms/
/cms/schools/
/cms/schools/:schoolId/classes/:classId
Goal: I'd like to split ./routes/schools.js into two files: schools.js and schools_classes.js, to keep a better overview.
Problem: I'd like to keep the prefixed path /cms/schools/, but don't know how to split it correctly.
How can I structure the files to reach the desired goal?
Thanks in advance!
Edit 1:
I tried the following, which is not working (duplicated route prefix):
app.use('/cms/', require('./routes/index.js'));
app.use('/cms/schools/', require('./routes/schools.js'));
app.use('/cms/schools/', require('./routes/schools_classes.js'));
You can do It using the express router:
Routes:
const schoolsRouter = require('./routes/schools');
app.use('/cms/schools', schoolsRouter)
./routes/schools/index.js:
const express = require('express');
const router = express.Router();
router.use('/',require('./schools _controller.js'));
router.use('/:schoolId/classes/:classId', require ('./schools_classes_controller.js'));
module.exports = router;
You can check the entire router docs here: http://expressjs.com/en/4x/api.html#router