We Keep Coding

How to run a delay function for 5 times in JavaScript?

I want to run a delay function for five seconds in JavaScript which will print "Hello" in the console after every second for five times.
Similar Python Code:
from time import delay
for I in range(5):
print("Hello")
delay(1)
The above code will print "Hello" five times with one second delay between each print.
Now I want to do similar kind of operation in JS.
Now in JS we have setTimeout function which will call a function after after a specified time. The following code will print "Hello" in the console after 1 second interval.
setTimeout(function(){
console.log("Hello");
}, 1000);
How can I run this code that will print 'Hello' in the console five times with an one second delay between each print?
NB: I tried to pass this function inside a for loop, but it did not work.

Try like this:
var count = 5;
printWithDelay();
function printWithDelay() {
setTimeout(function() {
console.log("Hello");
count--;
if (0 < count) {
printWithDelay();
};
}, 1000);
};
In JavaScript, 'setTimeout' runs after the code that follows it, so the next iteration of the loop needs to be called from within the callback function for this to work.

JavaScript, unlike PHP and Python, is asynchronous. The event loop is sensitive to anything that blocks it. However, there are ways to achieve what you want.
setInterval
With setInterval, you can build a wrapper it and use it.
function repeatFunction(func, delay, repeat) {
let counter = 0;
let interval = setInterval(() => {
if (repeat !== counter) {
func();
counter++;
} else {
clearInterval(interval)
}
}, delay);
}
repeatFunction(() => console.log(5), 1000, 4)
async/await syntax
The other option is using async/await with Promises (recommended)
function sleep(ms) {
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms))
}
(async() => {
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
console.log(i);
await sleep(1000);
}
console.log('done')
})();

Use setInterval, this should get your job done!
const test = setInterval(() => console.log("Hello"), 1000);
And then after 5seconds remove interval
setTimeout( () => clearInterval(test), 5000)
const test = setInterval(() => document.body.innerText += "Hello", 1000);
setTimeout( () => clearInterval(test), 5000);
NOTE: The first console.log() will happen after a second, if you want it immediately just put one console.log() outside the setInterval.

For Loop SetTimeout Works Only 1 Time

I have a button with click function below. It has 3 nested for loop, and 1 setTimeout function.
The below loops are looping 5 times. I want below code to work(5x5) total 25 seconds of execution time, and each 5 seconds console output should be "Waited" printed.
However below code works only 5 seconds, and immediately prints "5 hello". Without changing my for loop structure, how can I make it work as I want?
jQuery("#btn_trendyolStocksSYNC").click(function() {
for(var product in all){
var colors = all[product];
for(var singleColor in colors[0]){
var size = colors[0][singleColor];
for(var index in size){
var singleSize = size[index];
setTimeout(function (){
console.log('Waited');
}, 5000);
}
}
}
});
Edit: I don't use the for loop with indexes, so solutions for number indexed for loops are not working for me.

You could try by adding await and a Promise:
jQuery("#btn_trendyolStocksSYNC").click(async function() {
for(var product in all){
var colors = all[product];
for(var singleColor in colors[0]){
var size = colors[0][singleColor];
for(var index in size){
var singleSize = size[index];
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(function (){
console.log('Waited');
resolve();
}, 5000));
}
}
}
});
What this does is simply tell your loop to stop and only continue once the Promise object calls its resolve parameter function. That way your delay should simply happen before the next iteration. This is the important code:
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(function (){
console.log('Waited');
resolve();
}, 5000));
It simply creates a Promise that we will resolve once the timeout has let 5000 milliseconds pass. Then we tell our loop to simply await that completion before continuing to the next item.
Note You also need to add async to your handler function, so javascript knows that this function can wait and take as long as it needs to.

The setTimeout(); function is asynchronous, meaning that your script will not wait for it to finish before moving on. That's why it has a callback.
Try something like this: (not the best method)
//delayed loop
var i = 1;
function loop() {
//wait 5 secs
setTimeout(function() {
console.log(i);
if(i>5) {
//cancel
return;
}
loop();
i++;
return;
}, 1000);
if(i>5) {
//cancel function
return;
}
}
//do the loop
loop();
Like what somethinghere said, you could put the setTimeout in the if statement.
Of course to do something after the loop ends you need a callback function.

you can use setInterval and clearInterval.
var n=0;
var a = setInterval(()=>{
console.log("Waited");
n++; if(n==5){clearInterval(a);}
},5000);

Angular 4 setTimeout() with variable delay and wait

I have a list of events with timestamp.
What I want is to display the events based on the timestamp:
To add a delay:
delay = timestamp(t+1) - timstamp(t)
I know this doesn't work well with setTimeout, but there is an workaround, if the timeout is constant, in my case is not.
Is it possible to make the next setTimeout() wait for the previous one? To be specific, if the first setTimeout() has a 5 second delay and the second one has 3 seconds, the second one will appear first. I want them to be in the same order but execute one after the other.
This example works for a constant delay, but I want to calculate the delay based on the information I take iterating the list.
for (i = 1; i <= 5; ++i) {
setDelay(i);
}
function setDelay(i) {
setTimeout(function(){
console.log(i);
}, 1000);
}

You can use IIFE (Immediately Invoked Function Expression) and function recursion instead. Like this:
let i = 0;
(function repeat(){
if (++i > 5) return;
setTimeout(function(){
console.log("Iteration: " + i);
repeat();
}, 5000);
})();
Live fiddle here.

When using the latest Typescript or ES code, we can use aync/await for this.
let timestampDiffs = [3, 2, 4];
(async () => {
for (let item of timestampDiffs) {
await timeout(item * 1000);
console.log('waited: ' + item);
}
})();
function timeout(ms) {
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms));
}
We need to wrap the for loop in an async immediately invoked function because to support await.
We also do need a timeout function that returns a promise once the timeout is complete.
After that, we wait for the timeout to complete before continuing with the loop.

Don't call it within a loop, as it won't wait for the setTimeout to complete.
You can instead pass a list of times that you want to wait, and iterate them recursively:
let waits = [5000, 3000, 1000];
function setDelay(times) {
if (times.length > 0) {
// Remove the first time from the array
let wait = times.shift();
console.log("Waiting", wait);
// Wait for the given amount of time
setTimeout(() => {
console.log("Waited ", wait);
// Call the setDelay function again with the remaining times
setDelay(times);
}, wait);
}
}
setDelay(waits);

You can set time out period using i value dynamically. Like
for (i = 1; i <= 5; ++i) {
setDelay(i);
}
function setDelay(i) {
setTimeout(function(){
console.log(i);
}, i*1000);
}

You can think of something like that:
setDelay(1,5);
function setDelay(i, max) {
setTimeout(function(){
console.log(i);
if(i < max){
i++;
setDelay(i, max);
}
}, 1000);
}
The idea is to set the next setTimeout(.. in a timeout.
Of course you can modify it to have different long timeouts as well.
Hope i can help :)

Wait 5 seconds before executing next line

This function below doesn’t work like I want it to; being a JS novice I can’t figure out why.
I need it to wait 5 seconds before checking whether the newState is -1.
Currently, it doesn’t wait, it just checks straight away.
function stateChange(newState) {
setTimeout('', 5000);
if(newState == -1) {
alert('VIDEO HAS STOPPED');
}
}

Browser
Here's a solution using the new async/await syntax.
Be sure to check browser support as this is a language feature introduced with ECMAScript 6.
Utility function:
const delay = ms => new Promise(res => setTimeout(res, ms));
Usage:
const yourFunction = async () => {
await delay(5000);
console.log("Waited 5s");
await delay(5000);
console.log("Waited an additional 5s");
};
The advantage of this approach is that it makes your code look and behave like synchronous code.
Node.js
Node.js 16 provides a built-in version of setTimeout that is promise-based so we don't have to create our own utility function:
import { setTimeout } from "timers/promises";
const yourFunction = async () => {
await setTimeout(5000);
console.log("Waited 5s");
await setTimeout(5000);
console.log("Waited an additional 5s");
};
⚠️ Just for the record, you might be tempted to use a wait function to circumvent race conditions (when testing asynchronous code for example). This is rarely a good idea.

You have to put your code in the callback function you supply to setTimeout:
function stateChange(newState) {
setTimeout(function () {
if (newState == -1) {
alert('VIDEO HAS STOPPED');
}
}, 5000);
}
Any other code will execute immediately.

You really shouldn't be doing this, the correct use of timeout is the right tool for the OP's problem and any other occasion where you just want to run something after a period of time. Joseph Silber has demonstrated that well in his answer. However, if in some non-production case you really want to hang the main thread for a period of time, this will do it.
function wait(ms){
var start = new Date().getTime();
var end = start;
while(end < start + ms) {
end = new Date().getTime();
}
}
With execution in the form:
console.log('before');
wait(7000); //7 seconds in milliseconds
console.log('after');
I've arrived here because I was building a simple test case for sequencing a mix of asynchronous operations around long-running blocking operations (i.e. expensive DOM manipulation) and this is my simulated blocking operation. It suits that job fine, so I thought I post it for anyone else who arrives here with a similar use case. Even so, it's creating a Date() object in a while loop, which might very overwhelm the GC if it runs long enough. But I can't emphasize enough, this is only suitable for testing, for building any actual functionality you should refer to Joseph Silber's answer.

If you're in an async function you can simply do it in one line:
console.log(1);
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 3000)); // 3 sec
console.log(2);
FYI, if target is NodeJS you can use this built-in function if you want (it's a predefined promisified setTimeout function):
import { setTimeout } from 'timers/promises';
await setTimeout(3000); // 3 sec

Use a delay function like this:
var delay = ( function() {
var timer = 0;
return function(callback, ms) {
clearTimeout (timer);
timer = setTimeout(callback, ms);
};
})();
Usage:
delay(function(){
// do stuff
}, 5000 ); // end delay
Credits: How to delay the .keyup() handler until the user stops typing?

You should not just try to pause 5 seconds in javascript. It doesn't work that way. You can schedule a function of code to run 5 seconds from now, but you have to put the code that you want to run later into a function and the rest of your code after that function will continue to run immediately.
For example:
function stateChange(newState) {
setTimeout(function(){
if(newState == -1){alert('VIDEO HAS STOPPED');}
}, 5000);
}
But, if you have code like this:
stateChange(-1);
console.log("Hello");
The console.log() statement will run immediately. It will not wait until after the timeout fires in the stateChange() function. You cannot just pause javascript execution for a predetermined amount of time.
Instead, any code that you want to run delays must be inside the setTimeout() callback function (or called from that function).
If you did try to "pause" by looping, then you'd essentially "hang" the Javascript interpreter for a period of time. Because Javascript runs your code in only a single thread, when you're looping nothing else can run (no other event handlers can get called). So, looping waiting for some variable to change will never work because no other code can run to change that variable.

setTimeout(function() {
$('.message').hide();
}, 5000);
This will hide the '.message' div after 5 seconds.

This solution comes from React Native's documentation for a refresh control:
function wait(timeout) {
return new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(resolve, timeout);
});
}
To apply this to the OP's question, you could use this function in coordination with await:
await wait(5000);
if (newState == -1) {
alert('Done');
}

Try this:
//the code will execute in 1 3 5 7 9 seconds later
function exec() {
for(var i=0;i<5;i++) {
setTimeout(function() {
console.log(new Date()); //It's you code
},(i+i+1)*1000);
}
}

Best way to create a function like this for wait in milli seconds, this function will wait for milliseconds provided in the argument:
function waitSeconds(iMilliSeconds) {
var counter= 0
, start = new Date().getTime()
, end = 0;
while (counter < iMilliSeconds) {
end = new Date().getTime();
counter = end - start;
}
}

Based on Joseph Silber's answer, I would do it like that, a bit more generic.
You would have your function (let's create one based on the question):
function videoStopped(newState){
if (newState == -1) {
alert('VIDEO HAS STOPPED');
}
}
And you could have a wait function:
function wait(milliseconds, foo, arg){
setTimeout(function () {
foo(arg); // will be executed after the specified time
}, milliseconds);
}
At the end you would have:
wait(5000, videoStopped, newState);
That's a solution, I would rather not use arguments in the wait function (to have only foo(); instead of foo(arg);) but that's for the example.

You can add delay by making small changes to your function ( async and await ).
const addNSecondsDelay = (n) => {
return new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(() => {
resolve();
}, n * 1000);
});
}
const asyncFunctionCall = async () {
console.log("stpe-1");
await addNSecondsDelay(5);
console.log("step-2 after 5 seconds delay");
}
asyncFunctionCall();

If you have an asyn function you can do:
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 5000));

Execute the setInterval function without delay the first time

It's there a way to configure the setInterval method of javascript to execute the method immediately and then executes with the timer

It's simplest to just call the function yourself directly the first time:
foo();
setInterval(foo, delay);
However there are good reasons to avoid setInterval - in particular in some circumstances a whole load of setInterval events can arrive immediately after each other without any delay. Another reason is that if you want to stop the loop you have to explicitly call clearInterval which means you have to remember the handle returned from the original setInterval call.
So an alternative method is to have foo trigger itself for subsequent calls using setTimeout instead:
function foo() {
// do stuff
// ...
// and schedule a repeat
setTimeout(foo, delay);
}
// start the cycle
foo();
This guarantees that there is at least an interval of delay between calls. It also makes it easier to cancel the loop if required - you just don't call setTimeout when your loop termination condition is reached.
Better yet, you can wrap that all up in an immediately invoked function expression which creates the function, which then calls itself again as above, and automatically starts the loop:
(function foo() {
...
setTimeout(foo, delay);
})();
which defines the function and starts the cycle all in one go.

I'm not sure if I'm understanding you correctly, but you could easily do something like this:
setInterval(function hello() {
console.log('world');
return hello;
}(), 5000);
There's obviously any number of ways of doing this, but that's the most concise way I can think of.

I stumbled upon this question due to the same problem but none of the answers helps if you need to behave exactly like setInterval() but with the only difference that the function is called immediately at the beginning.
Here is my solution to this problem:
function setIntervalImmediately(func, interval) {
func();
return setInterval(func, interval);
}
The advantage of this solution:
existing code using setInterval can easily be adapted by substitution
works in strict mode
it works with existing named functions and closures
you can still use the return value and pass it to clearInterval() later
Example:
// create 1 second interval with immediate execution
var myInterval = setIntervalImmediately( _ => {
console.log('hello');
}, 1000);
// clear interval after 4.5 seconds
setTimeout( _ => {
clearInterval(myInterval);
}, 4500);
To be cheeky, if you really need to use setInterval then you could also replace the original setInterval. Hence, no change of code required when adding this before your existing code:
var setIntervalOrig = setInterval;
setInterval = function(func, interval) {
func();
return setIntervalOrig(func, interval);
}
Still, all advantages as listed above apply here but no substitution is necessary.

You could wrap setInterval() in a function that provides that behavior:
function instantGratification( fn, delay ) {
fn();
setInterval( fn, delay );
}
...then use it like this:
instantGratification( function() {
console.log( 'invoked' );
}, 3000);

Here's a wrapper to pretty-fy it if you need it:
(function() {
var originalSetInterval = window.setInterval;
window.setInterval = function(fn, delay, runImmediately) {
if(runImmediately) fn();
return originalSetInterval(fn, delay);
};
})();
Set the third argument of setInterval to true and it'll run for the first time immediately after calling setInterval:
setInterval(function() { console.log("hello world"); }, 5000, true);
Or omit the third argument and it will retain its original behaviour:
setInterval(function() { console.log("hello world"); }, 5000);
Some browsers support additional arguments for setInterval which this wrapper doesn't take into account; I think these are rarely used, but keep that in mind if you do need them.

Here's a simple version for novices without all the messing around. It just declares the function, calls it, then starts the interval. That's it.
//Declare your function here
function My_Function(){
console.log("foo");
}
//Call the function first
My_Function();
//Set the interval
var interval = window.setInterval( My_Function, 500 );

There's a convenient npm package called firstInterval (full disclosure, it's mine).
Many of the examples here don't include parameter handling, and changing default behaviors of setInterval in any large project is evil. From the docs:
This pattern
setInterval(callback, 1000, p1, p2);
callback(p1, p2);
is identical to
firstInterval(callback, 1000, p1, p2);
If you're old school in the browser and don't want the dependency, it's an easy cut-and-paste from the code.

I will suggest calling the functions in the following sequence
var _timer = setInterval(foo, delay, params);
foo(params)
You can also pass the _timer to the foo, if you want to clearInterval(_timer) on a certain condition
var _timer = setInterval(function() { foo(_timer, params) }, delay);
foo(_timer, params);

For someone needs to bring the outer this inside as if it's an arrow function.
(function f() {
this.emit("...");
setTimeout(f.bind(this), 1000);
}).bind(this)();
If the above producing garbage bothers you, you can make a closure instead.
(that => {
(function f() {
that.emit("...");
setTimeout(f, 1000);
})();
})(this);
Or maybe consider using the #autobind decorator depending on your code.

You can set a very small initial delay-time (e.g. 100) and set it to your desired delay-time within the function:
var delay = 100;
function foo() {
console.log("Change initial delay-time to what you want.");
delay = 12000;
setTimeout(foo, delay);
}

To solve this problem , I run the function a first time after the page has loaded.
function foo(){ ... }
window.onload = function() {
foo();
};
window.setInterval(function()
{
foo();
}, 5000);

This example builds on #Alnitak's answer, but uses await Promise for finer granularity of control within the loop cycle.
Compare examples:
let stillGoing = true;
(function foo() {
console.log('The quick brown fox did its thing');
if (stillGoing) setTimeout(foo, 5000);
})();
foo();
In the above example we call foo() and then it calls itself every 5 seconds.
But if, at some point in the future, we set stillGoing to false in order to stop the loop, we'll still get an extra log line even after we've issued the stop order. This is because at any given time, before we set stillGoing to false the current iteration will have already created a timeout to call the next iteration.
If we instead use await Promise as the delay mechanism then we have an opportunity to stop the loop before calling the next iteration:
let stillGoing = true;
(async function foo() {
console.log('The quick brown fox did its thing');
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 5000));
if (stillGoing) foo();
})();
foo();
In the second example we start by setting a 5000ms delay, after which we check the stillGoing value and decide whether calling another recursion is appropriate.
So if we set stillGoing to false at any point, there won't be that one extra log line printed after we set the value.
The caveat is this requires the function to be async, which may or may not be an option for a given use.

For Those using React, here is how I solve this problem:
const intervalRef = useRef(0);
useEffect(() => {
if (condition is true){
if (intervalRef.current === 0) {
callMyFunction();
}
const interval = setInterval(() => {
callMyFunction();
}, 5_000);
intervalRef.current = interval;
} else {
clearInterval(intervalRef.current);
}
}, [deps]);

// YCombinator
function anonymous(fnc) {
return function() {
fnc.apply(fnc, arguments);
return fnc;
}
}
// Invoking the first time:
setInterval(anonymous(function() {
console.log("bar");
})(), 4000);
// Not invoking the first time:
setInterval(anonymous(function() {
console.log("foo");
}), 4000);
// Or simple:
setInterval(function() {
console.log("baz");
}, 4000);
Ok this is so complex, so, let me put it more simple:
function hello(status ) {
console.log('world', ++status.count);
return status;
}
setInterval(hello, 5 * 1000, hello({ count: 0 }));

If you can use RxJS, there is something called timer():
import { Subscription, timer } from 'rxjs';
const INITIAL_DELAY = 1;
const INTERVAL_DELAY = 10000;
const timerSubscription = timer(INITIAL_DELAY, INTERVAL_DELAY)
.subscribe(() => {
this.updateSomething();
});
// when destroying
timerSubscription.unsubscribe();

With ES2017, it may be preferable to avoid setInterval altogether.
The following solution has a much cleaner execution flow, prevents issues if the function takes longer than the desired time to complete, and allows for asynchronous operations.
const timeout = (delayMs) => new Promise((res, _rej) => setTimeout(res, delayMs));
const DELAY = 1_000;
(async () => {
while (true) {
let start_time = Date.now();
// insert code here...
let end_time = Date.now();
await timeout(DELAY - (end_time - start_time));
}
})();

There's a problem with immediate asynchronous call of your function, because standard setTimeout/setInterval has a minimal timeout about several milliseconds even if you directly set it to 0. It caused by a browser specific work.
An example of code with a REAL zero delay wich works in Chrome, Safari, Opera
function setZeroTimeout(callback) {
var channel = new MessageChannel();
channel.port1.onmessage = callback;
channel.port2.postMessage('');
}
You can find more information here
And after the first manual call you can create an interval with your function.

actually the quickest is to do
interval = setInterval(myFunction(),45000)
this will call myfunction, and then will do it agaian every 45 seconds which is different than doing
interval = setInterval(myfunction, 45000)
which won't call it, but schedule it only