get Object path "name" [duplicate]

get Object path "name" [duplicate] - javascript

Is it possible to get the object property name as a string
person = {};
person.first_name = 'Jack';
person.last_name = 'Trades';
person.address = {};
person.address.street = 'Factory 1';
person.address.country = 'USA';
I'd like to use it like this:
var pn = propName( person.address.country ); // should return 'country' or 'person.address.country'
var pn = propName( person.first_name ); // should return 'first_name' or 'person.first_name'
NOTE: this code is exactly what I'm looking for. I understand it sounds even stupid, but it's not.
This is what I want to do with it.
HTML
person = {};
person.id_first_name = 'Jack';
person.id_last_name = 'Trades';
person.address = {};
person.address.id_address = 'Factory 1';
person.address.id_country = 'USA';
extPort.postMessage
(
{
message : MSG_ACTION,
propName( person.first_name ): person.first_name
}
};
----------------------ANSWER-----------------------
Got it thanks to ibu. He pointed the right way and I used a recursive function
var res = '';
function propName(prop, value) {
for (var i in prop) {
if (typeof prop[i] == 'object') {
if (propName(prop[i], value)) {
return res;
}
} else {
if (prop[i] == value) {
res = i;
return res;
}
}
}
return undefined;
}
var pn = propName(person, person.first_name); // returns 'first_name'
var pn = propName(person, person.address.country); // returns 'country'
DEMO: http://jsbin.com/iyabal/1/edit

I know a best practice that using Object.keys(your_object). It will parse to array property name for you. Example:
var person = { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Cena', age: '30' };
var listPropertyNames = Object.keys(person); //["firstName", "lastName", "age"]
I hope this example is useful for you.

You can accomplish this by converting all object properties into functions which will return the their own names
var person = {};
person.firstname = 'Jack';
person.address = "123 Street";
function getPropertyName(obj, expression) {
var res = {};
Object.keys(obj).map(k => { res[k] = () => k; });
return expression(res)();
}
let result = getPropertyName(person, o => o.address);
console.log(result); // Output: 'address'

If anyone's looking for a TypeScript version of MarsRobot's answer, try this:
function nameof<T>(obj: T, expression: (x: { [Property in keyof T]: () => string }) => () => string): string
{
const res: { [Property in keyof T]: () => string } = {} as { [Property in keyof T]: () => string };
Object.keys(obj).map(k => res[k as keyof T] = () => k);
return expression(res)();
}
Usage:
const obj = {
property1: 'Jim',
property2: 'Bloggs',
property3: 'Bloggs',
method: () => 'a string',
child: { property4: 'child1' }
};
const test1 = nameof(obj, x => x.property1);
const test2 = nameof(obj, x => x.property2);
const test3 = nameof(obj, x => x.method);
const test4 = nameof(obj.child, x => x.property4);
console.log(test1); // -> 'property1'
console.log(test2); // -> 'property2'
console.log(test3); // -> 'method'
console.log(test4); // -> 'property4'
This version works even when objects have multiple properties with the same value (unlike some of the other answers above), and with editors like Visual Studio will provide intellisense for the property names when you get here: nameof(obj, x => x.

You can wrap your property in a function and then convert the function to a string and get the property out of it.
For example:
function getPropertyName(propertyFunction) {
return /\.([^\.;]+);?\s*\}$/.exec(propertyFunction.toString())[1];
}
Then to use it:
var myObj = {
myProperty: "testing"
};
getPropertyName(function() { myObj.myProperty; }); // myProperty
Beware that minifiers could break this.
Edit: I have created a compiler transform that works with babel and the typescript compiler (see ts-nameof). This is a much more reliable than doing something at runtime.

Yes you can, with a little change.
function propName(prop, value){
for(var i in prop) {
if (prop[i] == value){
return i;
}
}
return false;
}
Now you can get the value like so:
var pn = propName(person,person.first_name);
// pn = "first_name";
Note I am not sure what it can be used for.
Other Note wont work very well with nested objects. but then again, see the first note.

Using Proxy:
var propName = ( obj ) => new Proxy(obj, {
get(_, key) {
return key;
}
});
var person = {};
person.first_name = 'Jack';
person.last_name = 'Trades';
person.address = {};
person.address.street = 'Factory 1';
person.address.country = 'USA';
console.log(propName(person).first_name);
console.log(propName(person.address).country);

I use the following in TypeScript. This way retains type-information and disallows selecting non-existing property keys.
export function getPropertyName<T extends object>(obj: T, selector: (x: Record<keyof T, keyof T>) => keyof T): keyof T {
const keyRecord = Object.keys(obj).reduce((res, key) => {
const typedKey = key as keyof T
res[typedKey] = typedKey
return res
}, {} as Record<keyof T, keyof T>)
return selector(keyRecord)
}
const obj = {
name: 'test',
address: {
street: 'test',
}
}
console.log(getPropertyName(obj, (x) => x.name)) // name
console.log(getPropertyName(obj.address, (x) => x.street)) // street

I like one liners, here's a generic solution:
const propName = (obj,type) => Object.keys(obj).find(key => obj[key] === type)
propName(person, person.age)

Following up on #David Sherret's answer with ES6 it can be made super simple:
propName = f => /\.([^\.;]+);?\s*\}$/.exec(f.toString())[1]
let prop = propName(() => {obj.name}); // myProperty

I prefer it clean and simple like this:
var obj = {
sessionId: 123,
branchId: 456,
seasonId: 789
};
var keys = Object.keys(obj);
for (var i in keys) {
console.log(keys[i]); //output of keys as string
}

You could create a namespacing method for the object. The method will need to mutate the object so that the strings becomes an object instead to hold two properties, a value and a _namespace.
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/y4Y8p/1/
var namespace = function(root, name) {
root._namespace = name;
function ns(obj) {
for( var i in obj ) {
var a = obj._namespace.split('.')
if ( a.length ) {
a.push(i);
}
if( typeof obj[i] == 'object' ) {
obj[i]._namespace = a.join('.');
ns(obj[i]);
return;
}
if( typeof obj[i] == 'string' ) {
var str = obj[i].toString();
obj[i] = {
_namespace: a.join('.'),
value: str
};
}
}
}
ns(root);
};
namespace(person, 'person');
console.log(person.address.street._namespace) // person.address.street
console.log(person.address.street.value) // 'Factory 1'
So now you can do:
var o = { message: MSG_ACTION };
o[ person.first_name._namespace ] = person.first_name.value;
extPort.postMessage(o);

I am in same situation.
Here is thy way to get it done using Lodash or UnderScore library, with one limitation of value to be unique:
var myObject = {
'a': 1,
'b': 2,
'c': 3
}
_.findKey(myObject, function( curValue ) { return myObject.a === curValue });
Plain JavaScript
function getPropAsString( source, value ){
var keys = Object.keys( source );
var curIndex,
total,
foundKey;
for(curIndex = 0, total = keys.length; curIndex < total; curIndex++){
var curKey = keys[ curIndex ];
if ( source[ curKey ] === value ){
foundKey = curKey;
break;
}
}
return foundKey;
}
var myObject = {
'a': 1,
'b': 2,
'c': 3
}
getPropAsString( myObject, myObject.a )
But, I would prefer to fix the code as solution. An example:
var myObject = {
'a': {key:'a', value:1},
'b': {key:'b', value:2},
'c': {key:'c', value:3}
}
console.log( myObject.a.key )

I am late to the party but I took a completely different approach, so I will throw in my approach and see what the community thinks.
I used Function.prototype.name to do what I want.
my properties are functions that when called return the value of the property, and I can get the name of the property (which is a function) using .name
Here is an example:
person = {
firstName(){
return 'John';
},
address(){
return '123 street'
}
}
person.firstName.name // 'firstName'
person.address.name // 'address'
Note:
you can't easily change the value of a property (e.g firstname) at run time in this case.
you would need to create a function (.name would be anonymous in this case) and this function would return a new named function which return the new value:
// note the () at the end
person.firstName = new Function('', 'return function firstName(){return "johny"}')();
person.firstName.name ; // 'firstName'
person.firstName(); // 'johny'

Improved Solution for TypeScript using PROXY from Isk1n solution:
//get property name
export function getPropertyName<T>(obj: any): T {
return new Proxy(obj, {
get(_, key) {
return key;
}
});
}
and usage:
sampleItem: TestClass = new TestClass();
getPropertyName<TestClass>(this.sampleItem).LayoutVersion

No, it's not possible.
Imagine this:
person.age = 42;
person.favoriteNumber = 42;
var pn = propName(person.age)
// == propName(42)
// == propName(person.favoriteNumber);
The reference to the property name is simply lost in that process.

Related

Js how to set an item at a nested index in an empty array [duplicate]

I hope someone can help me with this Javascript.
I have an Object called "Settings" and I would like to write a function that adds new settings to that object.
The new setting's name and value are provided as strings. The string giving the setting's name is then split by the underscores into an array. The new setting should get added to the existing "Settings" object by creating new nested objects with the names given by each part of the array, except the last part which should be a string giving the setting's value. I should then be able to refer to the setting and e.g. alert its value. I can do this in a static way like this...
var Settings = {};
var newSettingName = "Modules_Video_Plugin";
var newSettingValue = "JWPlayer";
var newSettingNameArray = newSettingName.split("_");
Settings[newSettingNameArray[0]] = {};
Settings[newSettingNameArray[0]][newSettingNameArray[1]] = {};
Settings[newSettingNameArray[0]][newSettingNameArray[1]][newSettingNameArray[2]] = newSettingValue;
alert(Settings.Modules.Mediaplayers.Video.Plugin);
... the part that creates the nested objects is doing this ...
Settings["Modules"] = {};
Settings["Modules"]["Video"] = {};
Settings["Modules"]["Video"]["Plugin"] = "JWPlayer";
However, as the number of parts that make up the setting name can vary, e.g. a newSettingName could be "Modules_Floorplan_Image_Src", I'd like to do this dynamically using a function such as...
createSetting (newSettingNameArray, newSettingValue);
function createSetting(setting, value) {
// code to create new setting goes here
}
Can anyone help me work out how to do this dynamically?
I presume there has to be a for...loop in there to itterate through the array, but I haven't been able to work out a way to create the nested objects.
If you've got this far thanks very much for taking the time to read even if you can't help.

Put in a function, short and fast (no recursion).
var createNestedObject = function( base, names ) {
for( var i = 0; i < names.length; i++ ) {
base = base[ names[i] ] = base[ names[i] ] || {};
}
};
// Usage:
createNestedObject( window, ["shapes", "triangle", "points"] );
// Now window.shapes.triangle.points is an empty object, ready to be used.
It skips already existing parts of the hierarchy. Useful if you are not sure whether the hierarchy was already created.
Or:
A fancier version where you can directly assign the value to the last object in the hierarchy, and you can chain function calls because it returns the last object.
// Function: createNestedObject( base, names[, value] )
// base: the object on which to create the hierarchy
// names: an array of strings contaning the names of the objects
// value (optional): if given, will be the last object in the hierarchy
// Returns: the last object in the hierarchy
var createNestedObject = function( base, names, value ) {
// If a value is given, remove the last name and keep it for later:
var lastName = arguments.length === 3 ? names.pop() : false;
// Walk the hierarchy, creating new objects where needed.
// If the lastName was removed, then the last object is not set yet:
for( var i = 0; i < names.length; i++ ) {
base = base[ names[i] ] = base[ names[i] ] || {};
}
// If a value was given, set it to the last name:
if( lastName ) base = base[ lastName ] = value;
// Return the last object in the hierarchy:
return base;
};
// Usages:
createNestedObject( window, ["shapes", "circle"] );
// Now window.shapes.circle is an empty object, ready to be used.
var obj = {}; // Works with any object other that window too
createNestedObject( obj, ["shapes", "rectangle", "width"], 300 );
// Now we have: obj.shapes.rectangle.width === 300
createNestedObject( obj, "shapes.rectangle.height".split('.'), 400 );
// Now we have: obj.shapes.rectangle.height === 400
Note: if your hierarchy needs to be built from values other that standard objects (ie. not {}), see also TimDog's answer below.
Edit: uses regular loops instead of for...in loops. It's safer in cases where a library modifies the Array prototype.

function assign(obj, keyPath, value) {
lastKeyIndex = keyPath.length-1;
for (var i = 0; i < lastKeyIndex; ++ i) {
key = keyPath[i];
if (!(key in obj)){
obj[key] = {}
}
obj = obj[key];
}
obj[keyPath[lastKeyIndex]] = value;
}
Usage:
var settings = {};
assign(settings, ['Modules', 'Video', 'Plugin'], 'JWPlayer');

My ES2015 solution. Keeps existing values.
const set = (obj, path, val) => {
const keys = path.split('.');
const lastKey = keys.pop();
const lastObj = keys.reduce((obj, key) =>
obj[key] = obj[key] || {},
obj);
lastObj[lastKey] = val;
};
Example:
const obj = {'a': {'prop': {'that': 'exists'}}};
set(obj, 'a.very.deep.prop', 'value');
console.log(JSON.stringify(obj));
// {"a":{"prop":{"that":"exists"},"very":{"deep":{"prop":"value"}}}}

Using ES6 is shorten. Set your path into an array.
first, you have to reverse the array, to start filling the object.
let obj = ['a','b','c'] // {a:{b:{c:{}}}
obj.reverse();
const nestedObject = obj.reduce((prev, current) => (
{[current]:{...prev}}
), {});

Another recursive solution:
var nest = function(obj, keys, v) {
if (keys.length === 1) {
obj[keys[0]] = v;
} else {
var key = keys.shift();
obj[key] = nest(typeof obj[key] === 'undefined' ? {} : obj[key], keys, v);
}
return obj;
};
Example usage:
var dog = {bark: {sound: 'bark!'}};
nest(dog, ['bark', 'loudness'], 66);
nest(dog, ['woff', 'sound'], 'woff!');
console.log(dog); // {bark: {loudness: 66, sound: "bark!"}, woff: {sound: "woff!"}}

I love this ES6 immutable way to set certain value on nested field:
const setValueToField = (fields, value) => {
const reducer = (acc, item, index, arr) => ({ [item]: index + 1 < arr.length ? acc : value });
return fields.reduceRight(reducer, {});
};
And then use it with creating your target object.
const targetObject = setValueToField(['one', 'two', 'three'], 'nice');
console.log(targetObject); // Output: { one: { two: { three: 'nice' } } }

Lodash has a _.set method to achieve this
let obj = {}
_.set(obj, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], 'e')
or
_.set(obj, 'a.b.c.d', 'e')
// which generate the following object
{
"a": {
"b": {
"c": {
"d": "e"
}
}
}
}

Here is a simple tweak to jlgrall's answer that allows setting distinct values on each element in the nested hierarchy:
var createNestedObject = function( base, names, values ) {
for( var i in names ) base = base[ names[i] ] = base[ names[i] ] || (values[i] || {});
};
Hope it helps.

Here is a functional solution to dynamically create nested objects.
const nest = (path, obj) => {
const reversedPath = path.split('.').reverse();
const iter = ([head, ...tail], obj) => {
if (!head) {
return obj;
}
const newObj = {[head]: {...obj}};
return iter(tail, newObj);
}
return iter(reversedPath, obj);
}
Example:
const data = {prop: 'someData'};
const path = 'a.deep.path';
const result = nest(path, data);
console.log(JSON.stringify(result));
// {"a":{"deep":{"path":{"prop":"someData"}}}}

Inspired by ImmutableJS setIn method which will never mutate the original. This works with mixed array and object nested values.
function setIn(obj = {}, [prop, ...rest], value) {
const newObj = Array.isArray(obj) ? [...obj] : {...obj};
newObj[prop] = rest.length ? setIn(obj[prop], rest, value) : value;
return newObj;
}
var obj = {
a: {
b: {
c: [
{d: 5}
]
}
}
};
const newObj = setIn(obj, ["a", "b", "c", 0, "x"], "new");
//obj === {a: {b: {c: [{d: 5}]}}}
//newObj === {a: {b: {c: [{d: 5, x: "new"}]}}}

Appreciate that this question is mega old! But after coming across a need to do something like this in node, I made a module and published it to npm.
Nestob
var nestob = require('nestob');
//Create a new nestable object - instead of the standard js object ({})
var newNested = new nestob.Nestable();
//Set nested object properties without having to create the objects first!
newNested.setNested('biscuits.oblong.marmaduke', 'cheese');
newNested.setNested(['orange', 'tartan', 'pipedream'], { poppers: 'astray', numbers: [123,456,789]});
console.log(newNested, newNested.orange.tartan.pipedream);
//{ biscuits: { oblong: { marmaduke: 'cheese' } },
orange: { tartan: { pipedream: [Object] } } } { poppers: 'astray', numbers: [ 123, 456, 789 ] }
//Get nested object properties without having to worry about whether the objects exist
//Pass in a default value to be returned if desired
console.log(newNested.getNested('generic.yoghurt.asguard', 'autodrome'));
//autodrome
//You can also pass in an array containing the object keys
console.log(newNested.getNested(['chosp', 'umbridge', 'dollar'], 'symbols'));
//symbols
//You can also use nestob to modify objects not created using nestob
var normalObj = {};
nestob.setNested(normalObj, 'running.out.of', 'words');
console.log(normalObj);
//{ running: { out: { of: 'words' } } }
console.log(nestob.getNested(normalObj, 'random.things', 'indigo'));
//indigo
console.log(nestob.getNested(normalObj, 'improbable.apricots'));
//false

Inside your loop you can use lodash.set and will create the path for you:
...
const set = require('lodash.set');
const p = {};
const [type, lang, name] = f.split('.');
set(p, [lang, type, name], '');
console.log(p);
// { lang: { 'type': { 'name': '' }}}

try using recursive function:
function createSetting(setting, value, index) {
if (typeof index !== 'number') {
index = 0;
}
if (index+1 == setting.length ) {
settings[setting[index]] = value;
}
else {
settings[setting[index]] = {};
createSetting(setting, value, ++index);
}
}

I think, this is shorter:
Settings = {};
newSettingName = "Modules_Floorplan_Image_Src";
newSettingValue = "JWPlayer";
newSettingNameArray = newSettingName.split("_");
a = Settings;
for (var i = 0 in newSettingNameArray) {
var x = newSettingNameArray[i];
a[x] = i == newSettingNameArray.length-1 ? newSettingValue : {};
a = a[x];
}

I found #jlgrall's answer was great but after simplifying it, it didn't work in Chrome. Here's my fixed should anyone want a lite version:
var callback = 'fn.item1.item2.callbackfunction',
cb = callback.split('.'),
baseObj = window;
function createNestedObject(base, items){
$.each(items, function(i, v){
base = base[v] = (base[v] || {});
});
}
callbackFunction = createNestedObject(baseObj, cb);
console.log(callbackFunction);
I hope this is useful and relevant. Sorry, I've just smashed this example out...

You can define your own Object methods; also I'm using underscore for brevity:
var _ = require('underscore');
// a fast get method for object, by specifying an address with depth
Object.prototype.pick = function(addr) {
if (!_.isArray(addr)) return this[addr]; // if isn't array, just get normally
var tmpo = this;
while (i = addr.shift())
tmpo = tmpo[i];
return tmpo;
};
// a fast set method for object, put value at obj[addr]
Object.prototype.put = function(addr, val) {
if (!_.isArray(addr)) this[addr] = val; // if isn't array, just set normally
this.pick(_.initial(addr))[_.last(addr)] = val;
};
Sample usage:
var obj = {
'foo': {
'bar': 0 }}
obj.pick('foo'); // returns { bar: 0 }
obj.pick(['foo','bar']); // returns 0
obj.put(['foo', 'bar'], -1) // obj becomes {'foo': {'bar': -1}}

A snippet for those who need to create a nested objects with support of array keys to set a value to the end of path. Path is the string like: modal.product.action.review.2.write.survey.data. Based on jlgrall version.
var updateStateQuery = function(state, path, value) {
var names = path.split('.');
for (var i = 0, len = names.length; i < len; i++) {
if (i == (len - 1)) {
state = state[names[i]] = state[names[i]] || value;
}
else if (parseInt(names[i+1]) >= 0) {
state = state[names[i]] = state[names[i]] || [];
}
else {
state = state[names[i]] = state[names[i]] || {};
}
}
};

Set Nested Data:
function setNestedData(root, path, value) {
var paths = path.split('.');
var last_index = paths.length - 1;
paths.forEach(function(key, index) {
if (!(key in root)) root[key] = {};
if (index==last_index) root[key] = value;
root = root[key];
});
return root;
}
var obj = {'existing': 'value'};
setNestedData(obj, 'animal.fish.pet', 'derp');
setNestedData(obj, 'animal.cat.pet', 'musubi');
console.log(JSON.stringify(obj));
// {"existing":"value","animal":{"fish":{"pet":"derp"},"cat":{"pet":"musubi"}}}
Get Nested Data:
function getNestedData(obj, path) {
var index = function(obj, i) { return obj && obj[i]; };
return path.split('.').reduce(index, obj);
}
getNestedData(obj, 'animal.cat.pet')
// "musubi"
getNestedData(obj, 'animal.dog.pet')
// undefined

Try this: https://github.com/silkyland/object-to-formdata
var obj2fd = require('obj2fd/es5').default
var fd = obj2fd({
a:1,
b:[
{c: 3},
{d: 4}
]
})
Result :
fd = [
a => 1,
b => [
c => 3,
d => 4
]
]

Here is a decomposition to several useful functions, that each preserve existing data. Does not handle arrays.
setDeep: Answers question. Non-destructive to other data in the object.
setDefaultDeep: Same, but only sets if not already set.
setDefault: Sets a key if not already set. Same as Python's setdefault.
setStructure: Helper function that builds the path.
// Create a nested structure of objects along path within obj. Only overwrites the final value.
let setDeep = (obj, path, value) =>
setStructure(obj, path.slice(0, -1))[path[path.length - 1]] = value
// Create a nested structure of objects along path within obj. Does not overwrite any value.
let setDefaultDeep = (obj, path, value) =>
setDefault(setStructure(obj, path.slice(0, -1)), path[path.length - 1], value)
// Set obj[key] to value if key is not in object, and return obj[key]
let setDefault = (obj, key, value) =>
obj[key] = key in obj ? obj[key] : value;
// Create a nested structure of objects along path within obj. Does not overwrite any value.
let setStructure = (obj, path) =>
path.reduce((obj, segment) => setDefault(obj, segment, {}), obj);
// EXAMPLES
let temp = {};
// returns the set value, similar to assignment
console.log('temp.a.b.c.d:',
setDeep(temp, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], 'one'))
// not destructive to 'one'
setDeep(temp, ['a', 'b', 'z'], 'two')
// does not overwrite, returns previously set value
console.log('temp.a.b.z: ',
setDefaultDeep(temp, ['a', 'b', 'z'], 'unused'))
// creates new, returns current value
console.log('temp["a.1"]: ',
setDefault(temp, 'a.1', 'three'))
// can also be used as a getter
console.log("temp.x.y.z: ",
setStructure(temp, ['x', 'y', 'z']))
console.log("final object:", temp)
I'm not sure why anyone would want string paths:
They are ambiguous for keys with periods
You have to build the strings in the first place

Since I started with something from this page, I wanted to contribute back
Other examples overwrote the final node even if it was set, and that wasn't what I wanted.
Also, if returnObj is set to true, it returns the base object. By default, falsy, it returns the deepest node.
function param(obj, path, value, returnObj) {
if (typeof path == 'string') path = path.split(".");
var child = obj;
path.forEach((key, i) => {
if (!(key in child)) {
child[key] = (i < path.length-1) ? {} : value || {};
}
child = child[key];
});
return returnObj ? obj : child;
}
var x = {};
var xOut = param(x, "y.z", "setting")
console.log(xOut);
xOut = param(x, "y.z", "overwrite") // won't set
console.log(xOut);
xOut = param(x, "y.a", "setting2")
console.log(xOut);
xOut = param(x, "y.a", "setting2", true) // get object rather than deepest node.
console.log(xOut);
You can also do something where numeric keys are placed in arrays (if they don't already exist). Note that numeric keys won't convert to arrays for the first element of the path, since that's set by the type of your base-object.
function isNumber(n) {
return !isNaN(parseFloat(n)) && isFinite(n);
}
function param(obj, path, value, returnObj) {
if (typeof path == 'string') path = path.split(".");
var child = obj;
path.forEach((key, i) => {
var nextKey = path[i+1];
if (!(key in child)) {
child[key] = (nextKey == undefined && value != undefined
? value
: isNumber(nextKey)
? []
: {});
}
child = child[key];
});
return returnObj ? obj : child;
}
var x = {};
var xOut = param(x, "y.z", "setting")
console.log(xOut);
xOut = param(x, "y.z", "overwrite") // won't set
console.log(xOut);
xOut = param(x, "y.a", "setting2")
console.log(xOut);
xOut = param(x, "y.a", "setting2", true) // get object rather than deepest node.
xOut = param(x, "1.0.2.a", "setting")
xOut = param(x, "1.0.1.a", "try to override") // won't set
xOut = param(x, "1.0.5.a", "new-setting", true) // get object rather than deepest node.
console.log(xOut);
Naturally, when the numeric keys are greater than 0, you might see some undefined gaps.
Practical uses of this might be
function AddNote(book, page, line) {
// assume a global global notes collection
var myNotes = param(allNotes, [book, page, line], []);
myNotes.push('This was a great twist!')
return myNotes;
}
var allNotes = {}
var youthfulHopes = AddNote('A Game of Thrones', 4, 2, "I'm already hooked, at least I won't have to wait long for the books to come out!");
console.log(allNotes)
// {"A Game of Thrones": [undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, [undefined, undefined, ["I'm already hooked, at least I won't have to wait long for the books to come out!"]]]}
console.log(youthfulHopes)
// ["I'm already hooked, at least I won't have to wait long for the books to come out!"]

function initPath(obj, path) {
path.split('.').reduce((o, key) => (
Object.assign(o, {[key]: Object(o[key])}),
o[key]
), obj);
return obj;
}
Usage
const obj = { a: { b: 'value1' } };
initPath(obj, 'a.c.d').a.c.d='value2';
/*
{
"a": {
"b": "value1",
"c": {
"d": "value2"
}
}
}
*/

simple answer. on es6, im using this
const assign = (obj, path, value) => {
let keyPath = path.split('.')
let lastKeyIndex = keyPath.length - 1
for (let i = 0; i < lastKeyIndex; ++i) {
let key = keyPath[i]
if (!(key in obj)) {
obj[key] = {}
}
obj = obj[key]
}
obj[keyPath[lastKeyIndex]] = value
}
example json
const obj = {
b: 'hello'
}
you can add new key
assign(obj, 'c.d.e', 'this value')
and you get like bellow
console.log(obj)
//response example
obj = {
b: 'hello',
c: {
d: {
e: 'this value'
}
}
}

function createObj(keys, value) {
let obj = {}
let schema = obj
keys = keys.split('.')
for (let i = 0; i < keys.length - 1; i++) {
schema[keys[i]] = {}
schema = schema[keys[i]]
}
schema[keys.pop()] = value
return obj
}
let keys = 'value1.value2.value3'
let value = 'Hello'
let obj = createObj(keys, value)

Eval is probably overkill but the result is simple to visualize, with no nested loops or recursion.
function buildDir(obj, path){
var paths = path.split('_');
var final = paths.pop();
for (let i = 1; i <= paths.length; i++) {
var key = "obj['" + paths.slice(0, i).join("']['") + "']"
console.log(key)
eval(`${key} = {}`)
}
eval(`${key} = '${final}'`)
return obj
}
var newSettingName = "Modules_Video_Plugin_JWPlayer";
var Settings = buildDir( {}, newSettingName );
Basically you are progressively writing a string "obj['one']= {}", "obj['one']['two']"= {} and evaling it;

typescript : logic to covert string array into custom object

Here is my requirement. I was able to achieve to some level in java but we need to move it to typescript (client side).
Note: The below input is for example purpose and may vary dynamically.
Input
var input = ["a.name", "a.type", "b.city.name" , "b.city.zip", "b.desc","c"];
We need to create an utility function that takes above input and returns output as below.
Output:
Should be string not an object or anything else.
"{ a { name, type }, b { city {name, zip } , desc }, c }"
any help is much appreciated.

I don't see that typescript plays any role in your question, but here's a solution for constructing the string you requested. I first turn the array into an object with those properties, then have a function which can turn an object into a string formatted like you have
const input = ["a.name", "a.type", "b.city.name" , "b.city.zip", "b.desc","c"];
const arrayToObject = (arr) => {
return arr.reduce((result, val) => {
const path = val.split('.');
let obj = result;
path.forEach(key => {
obj[key] = obj[key] || {};
obj = obj[key];
});
return result;
}, {});
}
const objectToString = (obj, name = '') => {
const keys = Object.keys(obj);
if (keys.length === 0) {
return name;
}
return `${name} { ${keys.map(k => objectToString(obj[k], k)).join(', ')} }`;
}
const arrayToString = arr => objectToString(arrayToObject(arr));
console.log(arrayToString(input));

Here's another variation. Trick is to parse the strings recursively and store the intermediate results in an Object.
function dotStringToObject(remainder, parent) {
if (remainder.indexOf('.') === -1) {
return parent[remainder] = true
} else {
var subs = remainder.split('.');
dotStringToObject(subs.slice(1).join('.'), (parent[subs[0]] || (parent[subs[0]] = {})))
}
}
var output = {};
["a.name", "a.type", "b.city.name" , "b.city.zip", "b.desc","c"].forEach(function(entry) {
dotStringToObject(entry, output)
});
var res = JSON.stringify(output).replace(/\"/gi, ' ').replace(/\:|true/gi, '').replace(/\s,\s/gi, ', ');
console.log(res)
// Prints: { a { name, type }, b { city { name, zip }, desc }, c }

You could do something like this:
var input = ["a.name", "a.type", "b.city.name" , "b.city.zip", "b.desc","c"];
var output = {};
for(var i =0; i < input.length; i+=2){
output[String.fromCharCode(i+97)] = {};
output[String.fromCharCode(i+97)].name = input[i];
output[String.fromCharCode(i+97)].type = input[i+1];
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(output));

Using the spread operator to copy an object with nested objects [duplicate]

I am trying to create a deep copy map method for my Redux project that will work with objects rather than arrays. I read that in Redux each state should not change anything in the previous states.
export const mapCopy = (object, callback) => {
return Object.keys(object).reduce(function (output, key) {
output[key] = callback.call(this, {...object[key]});
return output;
},
{});
}
It works:
return mapCopy(state, e => {
if (e.id === action.id) {
e.title = 'new item';
}
return e;
})
However it does not deep copy inner items so I need to tweak it to:
export const mapCopy = (object, callback) => {
return Object.keys(object).reduce(function (output, key) {
let newObject = {...object[key]};
newObject.style = {...newObject.style};
newObject.data = {...newObject.data};
output[key] = callback.call(this, newObject);
return output;
}, {});
}
This is less elegant as it requires to know which objects are passed.
Is there a way in ES6 to use the spread syntax to deep copy an object?

Use JSON for deep copy
var newObject = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(oldObject))
var oldObject = {
name: 'A',
address: {
street: 'Station Road',
city: 'Pune'
}
}
var newObject = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(oldObject));
newObject.address.city = 'Delhi';
console.log('newObject');
console.log(newObject);
console.log('oldObject');
console.log(oldObject);

No such functionality is built-in to ES6. I think you have a couple of options depending on what you want to do.
If you really want to deep copy:
Use a library. For example, lodash has a cloneDeep method.
Implement your own cloning function.
Alternative Solution To Your Specific Problem (No Deep Copy)
However, I think, if you're willing to change a couple things, you can save yourself some work. I'm assuming you control all call sites to your function.
Specify that all callbacks passed to mapCopy must return new objects instead of mutating the existing object. For example:
mapCopy(state, e => {
if (e.id === action.id) {
return Object.assign({}, e, {
title: 'new item'
});
} else {
return e;
}
});
This makes use of Object.assign to create a new object, sets properties of e on that new object, then sets a new title on that new object. This means you never mutate existing objects and only create new ones when necessary.
mapCopy can be really simple now:
export const mapCopy = (object, callback) => {
return Object.keys(object).reduce(function (output, key) {
output[key] = callback.call(this, object[key]);
return output;
}, {});
}
Essentially, mapCopy is trusting its callers to do the right thing. This is why I said this assumes you control all call sites.

From MDN
Note: Spread syntax effectively goes one level deep while copying an array. Therefore, it may be unsuitable for copying multidimensional arrays as the following example shows (it's the same with Object.assign() and spread syntax).
Personally, I suggest using Lodash's cloneDeep function for multi-level object/array cloning.
Here is a working example:
const arr1 = [{ 'a': 1 }];
const arr2 = [...arr1];
const arr3 = _.clone(arr1);
const arr4 = arr1.slice();
const arr5 = _.cloneDeep(arr1);
const arr6 = [...{...arr1}]; // a bit ugly syntax but it is working!
// first level
console.log(arr1 === arr2); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr3); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr4); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr5); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr6); // false
// second level
console.log(arr1[0] === arr2[0]); // true
console.log(arr1[0] === arr3[0]); // true
console.log(arr1[0] === arr4[0]); // true
console.log(arr1[0] === arr5[0]); // false
console.log(arr1[0] === arr6[0]); // false
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.js"></script>

I often use this:
function deepCopy(obj) {
if(typeof obj !== 'object' || obj === null) {
return obj;
}
if(obj instanceof Date) {
return new Date(obj.getTime());
}
if(obj instanceof Array) {
return obj.reduce((arr, item, i) => {
arr[i] = deepCopy(item);
return arr;
}, []);
}
if(obj instanceof Object) {
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((newObj, key) => {
newObj[key] = deepCopy(obj[key]);
return newObj;
}, {})
}
}

You can use structuredClone() like the following:
const myOriginal = {
title: "Full Stack JavaScript Developer",
info: {
firstname: "Abolfazl",
surname: "Roshanzamir",
age: 34
}
};
const myDeepCopy = structuredClone(myOriginal);
structuredClone()
You can use structuredClone() that is a built-in function for deep-copying.
Structured cloning addresses many (although not all) shortcomings of the JSON.stringify() technique.
Structured cloning can handle cyclical data structures,
support many built-in data types, and is generally more robust and often faster.
However, it still has some limitations that may catch you off-guard:
1-Prototypes : If you use structuredClone() with a class instance,
you’ll get a plain object as the return value, as structured cloning discards the object’s prototype chain.
2-Functions: If your object contains functions, they will be quietly discarded.
3- Non-cloneables: Some values are not structured cloneable, most notably Error and DOM nodes. It will cause structuredClone() to throw.
const myDeepCopy = structuredClone(myOriginal);
JSON.stringify
If you simply want to deep copy the object to another object,
all you will need to do is JSON.stringify the object and parse it using JSON.parse afterward.
This will essentially perform deep copying of the object.
let user1 = {
name: 'Abolfazl Roshanzamir',
age: 34,
university: {
name: 'Shiraz Bahonar University'
}
};
let user2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(user1));
user2.name = 'Andy Madadian';
user2.university.name = 'Kerman Bahonar University'
console.log(user2);
// { name: 'Andy Madadian', age: 33, university: { name: 'Kerman Bahonar University' } }
console.log(user1);
// { name: 'Abolfazl Roshanzamir', age: 33, university: { name: 'Shiraz Bahonar University' } }
Spread operator / Object.assign()
One way to create a shallow copy in JavaScript using the object spread operator ... or Object.assign() like the following:
const myShallowCopySpread = {...myOriginal};
const myShallowCopyObjectAssign=Object.assign({},obj)
Performance
When it comes to performance the creator Surma has pointed out that JSON.Parse() can be a bit faster for small objects. But when you have a large object, complex object
structuredClone() starts to get significantly faster.
Browser support is pretty fantastic And even is supported by Node.js.

const a = {
foods: {
dinner: 'Pasta'
}
}
let b = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a))
b.foods.dinner = 'Soup'
console.log(b.foods.dinner) // Soup
console.log(a.foods.dinner) // Pasta
Using JSON.stringify and JSON.parse is the best way. Because by using the spread operator we will not get the efficient answer when the json object contains another object inside it. we need to manually specify that.

Here's my deep copy algorithm.
const DeepClone = (obj) => {
if(obj===null||typeof(obj)!=='object')return null;
let newObj = { ...obj };
for (let prop in obj) {
if (
typeof obj[prop] === "object" ||
typeof obj[prop] === "function"
) {
newObj[prop] = DeepClone(obj[prop]);
}
}
return newObj;
};

// use: clone( <thing to copy> ) returns <new copy>
// untested use at own risk
function clone(o, m){
// return non object values
if('object' !==typeof o) return o
// m: a map of old refs to new object refs to stop recursion
if('object' !==typeof m || null ===m) m =new WeakMap()
var n =m.get(o)
if('undefined' !==typeof n) return n
// shallow/leaf clone object
var c =Object.getPrototypeOf(o).constructor
// TODO: specialize copies for expected built in types i.e. Date etc
switch(c) {
// shouldn't be copied, keep reference
case Boolean:
case Error:
case Function:
case Number:
case Promise:
case String:
case Symbol:
case WeakMap:
case WeakSet:
n =o
break;
// array like/collection objects
case Array:
m.set(o, n =o.slice(0))
// recursive copy for child objects
n.forEach(function(v,i){
if('object' ===typeof v) n[i] =clone(v, m)
});
break;
case ArrayBuffer:
m.set(o, n =o.slice(0))
break;
case DataView:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(clone(o.buffer, m), o.byteOffset, o.byteLength))
break;
case Map:
case Set:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(clone(Array.from(o.entries()), m)))
break;
case Int8Array:
case Uint8Array:
case Uint8ClampedArray:
case Int16Array:
case Uint16Array:
case Int32Array:
case Uint32Array:
case Float32Array:
case Float64Array:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(clone(o.buffer, m), o.byteOffset, o.length))
break;
// use built in copy constructor
case Date:
case RegExp:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(o))
break;
// fallback generic object copy
default:
m.set(o, n =Object.assign(new (c)(), o))
// recursive copy for child objects
for(c in n) if('object' ===typeof n[c]) n[c] =clone(n[c], m)
}
return n
}

Here is the deepClone function which handles all primitive, array, object, function data types
function deepClone(obj){
if(Array.isArray(obj)){
var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; i++) {
arr[i] = deepClone(obj[i]);
}
return arr;
}
if(typeof(obj) == "object"){
var cloned = {};
for(let key in obj){
cloned[key] = deepClone(obj[key])
}
return cloned;
}
return obj;
}
console.log( deepClone(1) )
console.log( deepClone('abc') )
console.log( deepClone([1,2]) )
console.log( deepClone({a: 'abc', b: 'def'}) )
console.log( deepClone({
a: 'a',
num: 123,
func: function(){'hello'},
arr: [[1,2,3,[4,5]], 'def'],
obj: {
one: {
two: {
three: 3
}
}
}
}) )

function deepclone(obj) {
let newObj = {};
if (typeof obj === 'object') {
for (let key in obj) {
let property = obj[key],
type = typeof property;
switch (type) {
case 'object':
if( Object.prototype.toString.call( property ) === '[object Array]' ) {
newObj[key] = [];
for (let item of property) {
newObj[key].push(this.deepclone(item))
}
} else {
newObj[key] = deepclone(property);
}
break;
default:
newObj[key] = property;
break;
}
}
return newObj
} else {
return obj;
}
}

const cloneData = (dataArray) => {
newData= []
dataArray.forEach((value) => {
newData.push({...value})
})
return newData
}
a = [{name:"siva"}, {name:"siva1"}] ;
b = myCopy(a)
b === a // false`

I myself landed on these answers last day, trying to find a way to deep copy complex structures, which may include recursive links. As I wasn't satisfied with anything being suggested before, I implemented this wheel myself. And it works quite well. Hope it helps someone.
Example usage:
OriginalStruct.deep_copy = deep_copy; // attach the function as a method
TheClone = OriginalStruct.deep_copy();
Please look at https://github.com/latitov/JS_DeepCopy for live examples how to use it, and also deep_print() is there.
If you need it quick, right here's the source of deep_copy() function:
function deep_copy() {
'use strict'; // required for undef test of 'this' below
// Copyright (c) 2019, Leonid Titov, Mentions Highly Appreciated.
var id_cnt = 1;
var all_old_objects = {};
var all_new_objects = {};
var root_obj = this;
if (root_obj === undefined) {
console.log(`deep_copy() error: wrong call context`);
return;
}
var new_obj = copy_obj(root_obj);
for (var id in all_old_objects) {
delete all_old_objects[id].__temp_id;
}
return new_obj;
//
function copy_obj(o) {
var new_obj = {};
if (o.__temp_id === undefined) {
o.__temp_id = id_cnt;
all_old_objects[id_cnt] = o;
all_new_objects[id_cnt] = new_obj;
id_cnt ++;
for (var prop in o) {
if (o[prop] instanceof Array) {
new_obj[prop] = copy_array(o[prop]);
}
else if (o[prop] instanceof Object) {
new_obj[prop] = copy_obj(o[prop]);
}
else if (prop === '__temp_id') {
continue;
}
else {
new_obj[prop] = o[prop];
}
}
}
else {
new_obj = all_new_objects[o.__temp_id];
}
return new_obj;
}
function copy_array(a) {
var new_array = [];
if (a.__temp_id === undefined) {
a.__temp_id = id_cnt;
all_old_objects[id_cnt] = a;
all_new_objects[id_cnt] = new_array;
id_cnt ++;
a.forEach((v,i) => {
if (v instanceof Array) {
new_array[i] = copy_array(v);
}
else if (v instanceof Object) {
new_array[i] = copy_object(v);
}
else {
new_array[i] = v;
}
});
}
else {
new_array = all_new_objects[a.__temp_id];
}
return new_array;
}
}
Cheers#!

I would suggest using the spread operator. You'll need to spread a second time if you need to update the second level. Attempting to update the newObject using something like newObject.address.city will throw an error if address did not already exist in oldObject.
const oldObject = {
name: 'A',
address: {
street: 'Station Road',
city: 'Pune'
}
}
const newObject = {
...oldObject,
address: {
...oldObject.address,
city: 'Delhi'
}
}
console.log(newObject)

This is a very old question but I think in 2022 there are many ways to solve this. However, if you want a simple, fast and vanilla JS solution check this out:
const cloner = (o) => {
let idx = 1
const isArray = (a) => a instanceof Array
const isObject = (o) => o instanceof Object
const isUndefined = (a) => a === undefined
const process = v => {
if (isArray(v)) return cloneArray(v)
else if (isObject(v)) return cloneObject(v)
else return v
}
const register = (old, o) => {
old.__idx = idx
oldObjects[idx] = old
newObjects[idx] = o
idx++
}
const cloneObject = o => {
if (!isUndefined(o.__idx)) return newObjects[o.__idx]
const obj = {}
for (const prop in o) {
if (prop === '__idx') continue
obj[prop] = process(o[prop])
}
register(o, obj)
return obj
}
const cloneArray = a => {
if (!isUndefined(a.__idx)) return newObjects[a.__idx]
const arr = a.map((v) => process(v))
register(a, arr)
return arr
}
const oldObjects = {}
const newObjects = {}
let tmp
if (isArray(o)) tmp = cloneArray(o)
else if (isObject(o)) tmp = cloneObject(o)
else return o
for (const id in oldObjects) delete oldObjects[id].__idx
return tmp
}
const c = {
id: 123,
label: "Lala",
values: ['char', 1, {flag: true}, [1,2,3,4,5], ['a', 'b']],
name: undefined
}
const d = cloner(c)
d.name = "Super"
d.values[2].flag = false
d.values[3] = [6,7,8]
console.log({ c, d })
It's recursive and self-contained, all the functions needed are defined in the function cloner().
In this snippet we are handling Array and Object types if you want to add more handlers you can add specify handlers like Date and clone it like new Date(v.getTime())
For me Array and Object are the types that I use the most in my implementations.

Deep copy in ES6 using the spread syntax

I am trying to create a deep copy map method for my Redux project that will work with objects rather than arrays. I read that in Redux each state should not change anything in the previous states.
export const mapCopy = (object, callback) => {
return Object.keys(object).reduce(function (output, key) {
output[key] = callback.call(this, {...object[key]});
return output;
},
{});
}
It works:
return mapCopy(state, e => {
if (e.id === action.id) {
e.title = 'new item';
}
return e;
})
However it does not deep copy inner items so I need to tweak it to:
export const mapCopy = (object, callback) => {
return Object.keys(object).reduce(function (output, key) {
let newObject = {...object[key]};
newObject.style = {...newObject.style};
newObject.data = {...newObject.data};
output[key] = callback.call(this, newObject);
return output;
}, {});
}
This is less elegant as it requires to know which objects are passed.
Is there a way in ES6 to use the spread syntax to deep copy an object?

Use JSON for deep copy
var newObject = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(oldObject))
var oldObject = {
name: 'A',
address: {
street: 'Station Road',
city: 'Pune'
}
}
var newObject = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(oldObject));
newObject.address.city = 'Delhi';
console.log('newObject');
console.log(newObject);
console.log('oldObject');
console.log(oldObject);

No such functionality is built-in to ES6. I think you have a couple of options depending on what you want to do.
If you really want to deep copy:
Use a library. For example, lodash has a cloneDeep method.
Implement your own cloning function.
Alternative Solution To Your Specific Problem (No Deep Copy)
However, I think, if you're willing to change a couple things, you can save yourself some work. I'm assuming you control all call sites to your function.
Specify that all callbacks passed to mapCopy must return new objects instead of mutating the existing object. For example:
mapCopy(state, e => {
if (e.id === action.id) {
return Object.assign({}, e, {
title: 'new item'
});
} else {
return e;
}
});
This makes use of Object.assign to create a new object, sets properties of e on that new object, then sets a new title on that new object. This means you never mutate existing objects and only create new ones when necessary.
mapCopy can be really simple now:
export const mapCopy = (object, callback) => {
return Object.keys(object).reduce(function (output, key) {
output[key] = callback.call(this, object[key]);
return output;
}, {});
}
Essentially, mapCopy is trusting its callers to do the right thing. This is why I said this assumes you control all call sites.

From MDN
Note: Spread syntax effectively goes one level deep while copying an array. Therefore, it may be unsuitable for copying multidimensional arrays as the following example shows (it's the same with Object.assign() and spread syntax).
Personally, I suggest using Lodash's cloneDeep function for multi-level object/array cloning.
Here is a working example:
const arr1 = [{ 'a': 1 }];
const arr2 = [...arr1];
const arr3 = _.clone(arr1);
const arr4 = arr1.slice();
const arr5 = _.cloneDeep(arr1);
const arr6 = [...{...arr1}]; // a bit ugly syntax but it is working!
// first level
console.log(arr1 === arr2); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr3); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr4); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr5); // false
console.log(arr1 === arr6); // false
// second level
console.log(arr1[0] === arr2[0]); // true
console.log(arr1[0] === arr3[0]); // true
console.log(arr1[0] === arr4[0]); // true
console.log(arr1[0] === arr5[0]); // false
console.log(arr1[0] === arr6[0]); // false
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.js"></script>

I often use this:
function deepCopy(obj) {
if(typeof obj !== 'object' || obj === null) {
return obj;
}
if(obj instanceof Date) {
return new Date(obj.getTime());
}
if(obj instanceof Array) {
return obj.reduce((arr, item, i) => {
arr[i] = deepCopy(item);
return arr;
}, []);
}
if(obj instanceof Object) {
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((newObj, key) => {
newObj[key] = deepCopy(obj[key]);
return newObj;
}, {})
}
}

You can use structuredClone() like the following:
const myOriginal = {
title: "Full Stack JavaScript Developer",
info: {
firstname: "Abolfazl",
surname: "Roshanzamir",
age: 34
}
};
const myDeepCopy = structuredClone(myOriginal);
structuredClone()
You can use structuredClone() that is a built-in function for deep-copying.
Structured cloning addresses many (although not all) shortcomings of the JSON.stringify() technique.
Structured cloning can handle cyclical data structures,
support many built-in data types, and is generally more robust and often faster.
However, it still has some limitations that may catch you off-guard:
1-Prototypes : If you use structuredClone() with a class instance,
you’ll get a plain object as the return value, as structured cloning discards the object’s prototype chain.
2-Functions: If your object contains functions, they will be quietly discarded.
3- Non-cloneables: Some values are not structured cloneable, most notably Error and DOM nodes. It will cause structuredClone() to throw.
const myDeepCopy = structuredClone(myOriginal);
JSON.stringify
If you simply want to deep copy the object to another object,
all you will need to do is JSON.stringify the object and parse it using JSON.parse afterward.
This will essentially perform deep copying of the object.
let user1 = {
name: 'Abolfazl Roshanzamir',
age: 34,
university: {
name: 'Shiraz Bahonar University'
}
};
let user2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(user1));
user2.name = 'Andy Madadian';
user2.university.name = 'Kerman Bahonar University'
console.log(user2);
// { name: 'Andy Madadian', age: 33, university: { name: 'Kerman Bahonar University' } }
console.log(user1);
// { name: 'Abolfazl Roshanzamir', age: 33, university: { name: 'Shiraz Bahonar University' } }
Spread operator / Object.assign()
One way to create a shallow copy in JavaScript using the object spread operator ... or Object.assign() like the following:
const myShallowCopySpread = {...myOriginal};
const myShallowCopyObjectAssign=Object.assign({},obj)
Performance
When it comes to performance the creator Surma has pointed out that JSON.Parse() can be a bit faster for small objects. But when you have a large object, complex object
structuredClone() starts to get significantly faster.
Browser support is pretty fantastic And even is supported by Node.js.

const a = {
foods: {
dinner: 'Pasta'
}
}
let b = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a))
b.foods.dinner = 'Soup'
console.log(b.foods.dinner) // Soup
console.log(a.foods.dinner) // Pasta
Using JSON.stringify and JSON.parse is the best way. Because by using the spread operator we will not get the efficient answer when the json object contains another object inside it. we need to manually specify that.

Here's my deep copy algorithm.
const DeepClone = (obj) => {
if(obj===null||typeof(obj)!=='object')return null;
let newObj = { ...obj };
for (let prop in obj) {
if (
typeof obj[prop] === "object" ||
typeof obj[prop] === "function"
) {
newObj[prop] = DeepClone(obj[prop]);
}
}
return newObj;
};

// use: clone( <thing to copy> ) returns <new copy>
// untested use at own risk
function clone(o, m){
// return non object values
if('object' !==typeof o) return o
// m: a map of old refs to new object refs to stop recursion
if('object' !==typeof m || null ===m) m =new WeakMap()
var n =m.get(o)
if('undefined' !==typeof n) return n
// shallow/leaf clone object
var c =Object.getPrototypeOf(o).constructor
// TODO: specialize copies for expected built in types i.e. Date etc
switch(c) {
// shouldn't be copied, keep reference
case Boolean:
case Error:
case Function:
case Number:
case Promise:
case String:
case Symbol:
case WeakMap:
case WeakSet:
n =o
break;
// array like/collection objects
case Array:
m.set(o, n =o.slice(0))
// recursive copy for child objects
n.forEach(function(v,i){
if('object' ===typeof v) n[i] =clone(v, m)
});
break;
case ArrayBuffer:
m.set(o, n =o.slice(0))
break;
case DataView:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(clone(o.buffer, m), o.byteOffset, o.byteLength))
break;
case Map:
case Set:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(clone(Array.from(o.entries()), m)))
break;
case Int8Array:
case Uint8Array:
case Uint8ClampedArray:
case Int16Array:
case Uint16Array:
case Int32Array:
case Uint32Array:
case Float32Array:
case Float64Array:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(clone(o.buffer, m), o.byteOffset, o.length))
break;
// use built in copy constructor
case Date:
case RegExp:
m.set(o, n =new (c)(o))
break;
// fallback generic object copy
default:
m.set(o, n =Object.assign(new (c)(), o))
// recursive copy for child objects
for(c in n) if('object' ===typeof n[c]) n[c] =clone(n[c], m)
}
return n
}

Here is the deepClone function which handles all primitive, array, object, function data types
function deepClone(obj){
if(Array.isArray(obj)){
var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; i++) {
arr[i] = deepClone(obj[i]);
}
return arr;
}
if(typeof(obj) == "object"){
var cloned = {};
for(let key in obj){
cloned[key] = deepClone(obj[key])
}
return cloned;
}
return obj;
}
console.log( deepClone(1) )
console.log( deepClone('abc') )
console.log( deepClone([1,2]) )
console.log( deepClone({a: 'abc', b: 'def'}) )
console.log( deepClone({
a: 'a',
num: 123,
func: function(){'hello'},
arr: [[1,2,3,[4,5]], 'def'],
obj: {
one: {
two: {
three: 3
}
}
}
}) )

function deepclone(obj) {
let newObj = {};
if (typeof obj === 'object') {
for (let key in obj) {
let property = obj[key],
type = typeof property;
switch (type) {
case 'object':
if( Object.prototype.toString.call( property ) === '[object Array]' ) {
newObj[key] = [];
for (let item of property) {
newObj[key].push(this.deepclone(item))
}
} else {
newObj[key] = deepclone(property);
}
break;
default:
newObj[key] = property;
break;
}
}
return newObj
} else {
return obj;
}
}

const cloneData = (dataArray) => {
newData= []
dataArray.forEach((value) => {
newData.push({...value})
})
return newData
}
a = [{name:"siva"}, {name:"siva1"}] ;
b = myCopy(a)
b === a // false`

I myself landed on these answers last day, trying to find a way to deep copy complex structures, which may include recursive links. As I wasn't satisfied with anything being suggested before, I implemented this wheel myself. And it works quite well. Hope it helps someone.
Example usage:
OriginalStruct.deep_copy = deep_copy; // attach the function as a method
TheClone = OriginalStruct.deep_copy();
Please look at https://github.com/latitov/JS_DeepCopy for live examples how to use it, and also deep_print() is there.
If you need it quick, right here's the source of deep_copy() function:
function deep_copy() {
'use strict'; // required for undef test of 'this' below
// Copyright (c) 2019, Leonid Titov, Mentions Highly Appreciated.
var id_cnt = 1;
var all_old_objects = {};
var all_new_objects = {};
var root_obj = this;
if (root_obj === undefined) {
console.log(`deep_copy() error: wrong call context`);
return;
}
var new_obj = copy_obj(root_obj);
for (var id in all_old_objects) {
delete all_old_objects[id].__temp_id;
}
return new_obj;
//
function copy_obj(o) {
var new_obj = {};
if (o.__temp_id === undefined) {
o.__temp_id = id_cnt;
all_old_objects[id_cnt] = o;
all_new_objects[id_cnt] = new_obj;
id_cnt ++;
for (var prop in o) {
if (o[prop] instanceof Array) {
new_obj[prop] = copy_array(o[prop]);
}
else if (o[prop] instanceof Object) {
new_obj[prop] = copy_obj(o[prop]);
}
else if (prop === '__temp_id') {
continue;
}
else {
new_obj[prop] = o[prop];
}
}
}
else {
new_obj = all_new_objects[o.__temp_id];
}
return new_obj;
}
function copy_array(a) {
var new_array = [];
if (a.__temp_id === undefined) {
a.__temp_id = id_cnt;
all_old_objects[id_cnt] = a;
all_new_objects[id_cnt] = new_array;
id_cnt ++;
a.forEach((v,i) => {
if (v instanceof Array) {
new_array[i] = copy_array(v);
}
else if (v instanceof Object) {
new_array[i] = copy_object(v);
}
else {
new_array[i] = v;
}
});
}
else {
new_array = all_new_objects[a.__temp_id];
}
return new_array;
}
}
Cheers#!

I would suggest using the spread operator. You'll need to spread a second time if you need to update the second level. Attempting to update the newObject using something like newObject.address.city will throw an error if address did not already exist in oldObject.
const oldObject = {
name: 'A',
address: {
street: 'Station Road',
city: 'Pune'
}
}
const newObject = {
...oldObject,
address: {
...oldObject.address,
city: 'Delhi'
}
}
console.log(newObject)

This is a very old question but I think in 2022 there are many ways to solve this. However, if you want a simple, fast and vanilla JS solution check this out:
const cloner = (o) => {
let idx = 1
const isArray = (a) => a instanceof Array
const isObject = (o) => o instanceof Object
const isUndefined = (a) => a === undefined
const process = v => {
if (isArray(v)) return cloneArray(v)
else if (isObject(v)) return cloneObject(v)
else return v
}
const register = (old, o) => {
old.__idx = idx
oldObjects[idx] = old
newObjects[idx] = o
idx++
}
const cloneObject = o => {
if (!isUndefined(o.__idx)) return newObjects[o.__idx]
const obj = {}
for (const prop in o) {
if (prop === '__idx') continue
obj[prop] = process(o[prop])
}
register(o, obj)
return obj
}
const cloneArray = a => {
if (!isUndefined(a.__idx)) return newObjects[a.__idx]
const arr = a.map((v) => process(v))
register(a, arr)
return arr
}
const oldObjects = {}
const newObjects = {}
let tmp
if (isArray(o)) tmp = cloneArray(o)
else if (isObject(o)) tmp = cloneObject(o)
else return o
for (const id in oldObjects) delete oldObjects[id].__idx
return tmp
}
const c = {
id: 123,
label: "Lala",
values: ['char', 1, {flag: true}, [1,2,3,4,5], ['a', 'b']],
name: undefined
}
const d = cloner(c)
d.name = "Super"
d.values[2].flag = false
d.values[3] = [6,7,8]
console.log({ c, d })
It's recursive and self-contained, all the functions needed are defined in the function cloner().
In this snippet we are handling Array and Object types if you want to add more handlers you can add specify handlers like Date and clone it like new Date(v.getTime())
For me Array and Object are the types that I use the most in my implementations.

Javascript HashTable use Object key

I want to create a hash table with Object keys that are not converted into String.
Some thing like this:
var object1 = new Object();
var object2 = new Object();
var myHash = new HashTable();
myHash.put(object1, "value1");
myHash.put(object2, "value2");
alert(myHash.get(object1), myHash.get(object2)); // I wish that it will print value1 value2
EDIT: See my answer for full solution

Here is a simple Map implementation that will work with any type of key, including object references, and it will not mutate the key in any way:
function Map() {
var keys = [], values = [];
return {
put: function (key, value) {
var index = keys.indexOf(key);
if(index == -1) {
keys.push(key);
values.push(value);
}
else {
values[index] = value;
}
},
get: function (key) {
return values[keys.indexOf(key)];
}
};
}
While this yields the same functionality as a hash table, it's not actually implemented using a hash function since it iterates over arrays and has a worst case performance of O(n). However, for the vast majority of sensible use cases this shouldn't be a problem at all. The indexOf function is implemented by the JavaScript engine and is highly optimized.

Here is a proposal:
function HashTable() {
this.hashes = {};
}
HashTable.prototype = {
constructor: HashTable,
put: function( key, value ) {
this.hashes[ JSON.stringify( key ) ] = value;
},
get: function( key ) {
return this.hashes[ JSON.stringify( key ) ];
}
};
The API is exactly as shown in your question.
You can't play with the reference in js however (so two empty objects will look like the same to the hashtable), because you have no way to get it. See this answer for more details: How to get javascript object references or reference count?
Jsfiddle demo: http://jsfiddle.net/HKz3e/
However, for the unique side of things, you could play with the original objects, like in this way:
function HashTable() {
this.hashes = {},
this.id = 0;
}
HashTable.prototype = {
constructor: HashTable,
put: function( obj, value ) {
obj.id = this.id;
this.hashes[ this.id ] = value;
this.id++;
},
get: function( obj ) {
return this.hashes[ obj.id ];
}
};
Jsfiddle demo: http://jsfiddle.net/HKz3e/2/
This means that your objects need to have a property named id that you won't use elsewhere. If you want to have this property as non-enumerable, I suggest you take a look at defineProperty (it's not cross-browser however, even with ES5-Shim, it doesn't work in IE7).
It also means you are limited on the number of items you can store in this hashtable. Limited to 253, that is.
And now, the "it's not going to work anywhere" solution: use ES6 WeakMaps. They are done exactly for this purpose: having objects as keys. I suggest you read MDN for more information: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/WeakMap
It slightly differs from your API though (it's set and not put):
var myMap = new WeakMap(),
object1 = {},
object2 = {};
myMap.set( object1, 'value1' );
myMap.set( object2, 'value2' );
console.log( myMap.get( object1 ) ); // "value1"
console.log( myMap.get( object2 ) ); // "value2"
Jsfiddle demo with a weakmap shim: http://jsfiddle.net/Ralt/HKz3e/9/
However, weakmaps are implemented in FF and Chrome (only if you enable the "Experimental javascript features" flag in chrome however). There are shims available, like this one: https://gist.github.com/1269991. Use at your own risk.
You can also use Maps, they may more suit your needs, since you also need to store primitive values (strings) as keys. Doc, Shim.

I took #Florian Margaine's suggestion to higher level and came up with this:
function HashTable(){
var hash = new Object();
this.put = function(key, value){
if(typeof key === "string"){
hash[key] = value;
}
else{
if(key._hashtableUniqueId == undefined){
key._hashtableUniqueId = UniqueId.prototype.generateId();
}
hash[key._hashtableUniqueId] = value;
}
};
this.get = function(key){
if(typeof key === "string"){
return hash[key];
}
if(key._hashtableUniqueId == undefined){
return undefined;
}
return hash[key._hashtableUniqueId];
};
}
function UniqueId(){
}
UniqueId.prototype._id = 0;
UniqueId.prototype.generateId = function(){
return (++UniqueId.prototype._id).toString();
};
Usage
var map = new HashTable();
var object1 = new Object();
map.put(object1, "Cocakola");
alert(map.get(object1)); // Cocakola
//Overriding
map.put(object1, "Cocakola 2");
alert(map.get(object1)); // Cocakola 2
// String key is used as String
map.put("myKey", "MyValue");
alert(map.get("myKey")); // MyValue
alert(map.get("my".concat("Key"))); // MyValue
// Invalid keys
alert(map.get("unknownKey")); // undefined
alert(map.get(new Object())); // undefined

Here is a proposal, combining #Florian's solution with #Laurent's.
function HashTable() {
this.hashes = [];
}
HashTable.prototype = {
constructor: HashTable,
put: function( key, value ) {
this.hashes.push({
key: key,
value: value
});
},
get: function( key ) {
for( var i = 0; i < this.hashes.length; i++ ){
if(this.hashes[i].key == key){
return this.hashes[i].value;
}
}
}
};
It wont change your object in any way and it doesn't rely on JSON.stringify.

I know that I am a year late, but for all others who stumble upon this thread, I've written the ordered object stringify to JSON, that solves the above noted dilemma: http://stamat.wordpress.com/javascript-object-ordered-property-stringify/
Also I was playing with custom hash table implementations which is also related to the topic: http://stamat.wordpress.com/javascript-quickly-find-very-large-objects-in-a-large-array/
//SORT WITH STRINGIFICATION
var orderedStringify = function(o, fn) {
var props = [];
var res = '{';
for(var i in o) {
props.push(i);
}
props = props.sort(fn);
for(var i = 0; i < props.length; i++) {
var val = o[props[i]];
var type = types[whatis(val)];
if(type === 3) {
val = orderedStringify(val, fn);
} else if(type === 2) {
val = arrayStringify(val, fn);
} else if(type === 1) {
val = '"'+val+'"';
}
if(type !== 4)
res += '"'+props[i]+'":'+ val+',';
}
return res.substring(res, res.lastIndexOf(','))+'}';
};
//orderedStringify for array containing objects
var arrayStringify = function(a, fn) {
var res = '[';
for(var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
var val = a[i];
var type = types[whatis(val)];
if(type === 3) {
val = orderedStringify(val, fn);
} else if(type === 2) {
val = arrayStringify(val);
} else if(type === 1) {
val = '"'+val+'"';
}
if(type !== 4)
res += ''+ val+',';
}
return res.substring(res, res.lastIndexOf(','))+']';
}

Based on Peters answer, but with proper class design (not abusing closures), so the values are debuggable. Renamed from Map to ObjectMap, because Map is a builtin function. Also added the exists method:
ObjectMap = function() {
this.keys = [];
this.values = [];
}
ObjectMap.prototype.set = function(key, value) {
var index = this.keys.indexOf(key);
if (index == -1) {
this.keys.push(key);
this.values.push(value);
} else {
this.values[index] = value;
}
}
ObjectMap.prototype.get = function(key) {
return this.values[ this.keys.indexOf(key) ];
}
ObjectMap.prototype.exists = function(key) {
return this.keys.indexOf(key) != -1;
}
/*
TestObject = function() {}
testA = new TestObject()
testB = new TestObject()
om = new ObjectMap()
om.set(testA, true)
om.get(testB)
om.exists(testB)
om.exists(testA)
om.exists(testB)
*/

When you say you don't want your Object keys converted into Strings, I'm going to assume it's because you just don't want the entire code contents of your Objects being used as keys. This, of course, makes perfect sense.
While there is no "hash table" in Javascript per-se, you can accomplish what you're looking for by simply overriding your Object's prototype.toString and returning a valid key value that will be unique to each instance. One way to do this is with Symbol():
function Obj () {
this.symbol = Symbol() // Guaranteed to be unique to each instance
}
Obj.prototype.toString = function () {
return this.symbol // Return the unique Symbol, instead of Obj's stringified code
}
let a = new Obj()
let b = new Obj()
let table = {}
table[a] = 'A'
table[b] = 'B'
console.log(table) // {Symbol(): 'A', Symbol(): 'B'}
console.log(table[a]) // A
console.log(table[b]) // B

Using JSON.stringify() is completely awkward to me, and gives the client no real control over how their keys are uniquely identified. The objects that are used as keys should have a hashing function, but my guess is that in most cases overriding the toString() method, so that they will return unique strings, will work fine:
var myMap = {};
var myKey = { toString: function(){ return '12345' }};
var myValue = 6;
// same as myMap['12345']
myMap[myKey] = myValue;
Obviously, toString() should do something meaningful with the object's properties to create a unique string. If you want to enforce that your keys are valid, you can create a wrapper and in the get() and put() methods, add a check like:
if(!key.hasOwnProperty('toString')){
throw(new Error('keys must override toString()'));
}
But if you are going to go thru that much work, you may as well use something other than toString(); something that makes your intent more clear.
So a very simple proposal would be:
function HashTable() {
this.hashes = {};
}
HashTable.prototype = {
constructor: HashTable,
put: function( key, value ) {
// check that the key is meaningful,
// also will cause an error if primitive type
if( !key.hasOwnProperty( 'hashString' ) ){
throw( new Error( 'keys must implement hashString()' ) );
}
// use .hashString() because it makes the intent of the code clear
this.hashes[ key.hashString() ] = value;
},
get: function( key ) {
// check that the key is meaningful,
// also will cause an error if primitive type
if( !key.hasOwnProperty( 'hashString' ) ){
throw( new Error( 'keys must implement hashString()' ) );
}
// use .hashString() because it make the intent of the code clear
return this.hashes[ key.hashString() ];
}
};

Inspired by #florian, here's a way where the id doesn't need JSON.stringify:
'use strict';
module.exports = HashTable;
function HashTable () {
this.index = [];
this.table = [];
}
HashTable.prototype = {
constructor: HashTable,
set: function (id, key, value) {
var index = this.index.indexOf(id);
if (index === -1) {
index = this.index.length;
this.index.push(id);
this.table[index] = {};
}
this.table[index][key] = value;
},
get: function (id, key) {
var index = this.index.indexOf(id);
if (index === -1) {
return undefined;
}
return this.table[index][key];
}
};

I took #Ilya_Gazman solution and improved it by setting '_hashtableUniqueId' as a not enumerable property (it won't appear in JSON requests neither will be listed in for loops). Also removed UniqueId object, since it is enough using only HastTable function closure. For usage details please see Ilya_Gazman post
function HashTable() {
var hash = new Object();
return {
put: function (key, value) {
if(!HashTable.uid){
HashTable.uid = 0;
}
if (typeof key === "string") {
hash[key] = value;
} else {
if (key._hashtableUniqueId === undefined) {
Object.defineProperty(key, '_hashtableUniqueId', {
enumerable: false,
value: HashTable.uid++
});
}
hash[key._hashtableUniqueId] = value;
}
},
get: function (key) {
if (typeof key === "string") {
return hash[key];
}
if (key._hashtableUniqueId === undefined) {
return undefined;
}
return hash[key._hashtableUniqueId];
}
};
}

The best solution is to use WeakMap when you can (i.e. when you target browsers supporting it)
Otherwise you can use the following workaround (Typescript written and collision safe):
// Run this in the beginning of your app (or put it into a file you just import)
(enableObjectID)();
const uniqueId: symbol = Symbol('The unique id of an object');
function enableObjectID(): void {
if (typeof Object['id'] !== 'undefined') {
return;
}
let id: number = 0;
Object['id'] = (object: any) => {
const hasUniqueId: boolean = !!object[uniqueId];
if (!hasUniqueId) {
object[uniqueId] = ++id;
}
return object[uniqueId];
};
}
Then you can simply get a unique number for any object in your code (like if would have been for pointer address)
let objectA = {};
let objectB = {};
let dico = {};
dico[(<any>Object).id(objectA)] = "value1";
// or
dico[Object['id'](objectA);] = "value1";
// If you are not using typescript you don't need the casting
dico[Object.id(objectA)] = "value1"

I know I'm late, but here's a simple HashMap implementation:
Function.prototype.toJSON = Function.prototype.toString;
//taken from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1249531/how-to-get-a-javascript-objects-class
function getNativeClass(obj) {
if (typeof obj === "undefined") return "undefined";
if (obj === null) return "null";
return Object.prototype.toString.call(obj).match(/^\[object\s(.*)\]$/)[1];
}
function globals() {
if (typeof global === "object") //node
return global;
return this;
}
function lookup(x) {
return globals()[x];
}
function getAnyClass(obj) {
if (typeof obj === "undefined") return "undefined";
if (obj === null) return "null";
return obj.constructor.name;
}
//taken from https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Errors/Cyclic_object_value#examples
var getCircularReplacer = () => {
const seen = new WeakSet();
return (key, value) => {
if (typeof value === "object" && value !== null) {
if (seen.has(value)) {
return "[Circular]";
}
seen.add(value);
}
return value;
};
};
function encode(x) {
if (typeof x === "object" && x !== null) {
var y = myClone(x);
x = Object.getPrototypeOf(x);
for (var i = 0; i < Object.getOwnPropertyNames(y).length; i++) { //Make enumerable
x[Object.getOwnPropertyNames(y)[i]] = y[Object.getOwnPropertyNames(y)[i]];
}
}
return getAnyClass(x) + " " + JSON.stringify(x, getCircularReplacer());
}
function decode(x) {
var a = x.split(" ").slice(1).join(" "); //OBJECT
if (typeof lookup(x.split(" ")[0])) {
return new (lookup(x.split(" ")[0]))(JSON.parse(a))
} else {
return JSON.parse(a);
}
}
//taken from https://github.com/feross/fromentries/blob/master/index.js
/*! fromentries. MIT License. Feross Aboukhadijeh <https://feross.org/opensource> */
function fromEntries(iterable) {
return [...iterable].reduce((obj, [key, val]) => {
obj[key] = val
return obj
}, {})
}
var toEnumerable = (obj) => {
return fromEntries(
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).map(prop => [prop, obj[prop]])
);
};
//taken from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41474986/how-to-clone-a-javascript-es6-class-instance
function myClone(instanceOfBlah) {
if (typeof instanceOfBlah !== "object" || !instanceOfBlah) { return instanceOfBlah; }
const clone = Object.assign({}, toEnumerable(instanceOfBlah));
const Blah = instanceOfBlah.constructor;
Object.setPrototypeOf(clone, Blah.prototype);
return clone;
}
function HashMap(a) {
if (typeof a === "undefined") {
a = [];
}
a = Array.from(a);
a = a.map((e) => [encode(e[0]), e[1]]);
this.a = a;
}
HashMap.from = function (a) {
var temp = myClone(a);
//convert to array
a = [];
for (var i = 0; i < Object.getOwnPropertyNames(temp).length; i++) {
a.push([Object.getOwnPropertyNames(temp)[i], temp[Object.getOwnPropertyNames(temp)[i]]]);
}
return new HashMap(a);
}
HashMap.prototype.put = function (x, y) {
this.a.push([encode(x), y]);
}
HashMap.prototype.get = function (x) {
var t1 = this.a.map((e) => e[0]);
return this.a[t1.indexOf(encode(x))][1];
}
HashMap.prototype.length = function () {
return this.a.length;
}
HashMap.prototype.toString = function () {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.length(); i++) {
result.push(JSON.stringify(decode(this.a[i][0]), getCircularReplacer()) + " => " + this.a[i][1]);
}
return "HashMap {" + result + "}";
}
var foo = new HashMap();
foo.put("SQRT3", Math.sqrt(3));
foo.put({}, "bar");
console.log(foo.get({}));
console.log(foo.toString());
Note that it is ordered.
Methods:
put: Adds an item
get: Access an item
from (static): Convert from a JavaScript object
toString: Convert to string
Minified and without the test:
function getNativeClass(t){return void 0===t?"undefined":null===t?"null":Object.prototype.toString.call(t).match(/^\[object\s(.*)\]$/)[1]}function globals(){return"object"==typeof global?global:this}function lookup(t){return globals()[t]}function getAnyClass(t){return void 0===t?"undefined":null===t?"null":t.constructor.name}Function.prototype.toJSON=Function.prototype.toString;var getCircularReplacer=()=>{const t=new WeakSet;return(e,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(t.has(r))return"[Circular]";t.add(r)}return r}};function encode(t){if("object"==typeof t&&null!==t){var e=myClone(t);t=Object.getPrototypeOf(t);for(var r=0;r<Object.getOwnPropertyNames(e).length;r++)t[Object.getOwnPropertyNames(e)[r]]=e[Object.getOwnPropertyNames(e)[r]]}return getAnyClass(t)+" "+JSON.stringify(t,getCircularReplacer())}function decode(t){var e=t.split(" ").slice(1).join(" ");return lookup(t.split(" ")[0]),new(lookup(t.split(" ")[0]))(JSON.parse(e))}function fromEntries(t){return[...t].reduce((t,[e,r])=>(t[e]=r,t),{})}var toEnumerable=t=>fromEntries(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(t).map(e=>[e,t[e]]));function myClone(t){if("object"!=typeof t||!t)return t;const e=Object.assign({},toEnumerable(t)),r=t.constructor;return Object.setPrototypeOf(e,r.prototype),e}function HashMap(t){void 0===t&&(t=[]),t=(t=Array.from(t)).map(t=>[encode(t[0]),t[1]]),this.a=t}HashMap.from=function(t){var e=myClone(t);t=[];for(var r=0;r<Object.getOwnPropertyNames(e).length;r++)t.push([Object.getOwnPropertyNames(e)[r],e[Object.getOwnPropertyNames(e)[r]]]);return new HashMap(t)},HashMap.prototype.put=function(t,e){this.a.push([encode(t),e])},HashMap.prototype.get=function(t){var e=this.a.map(t=>t[0]);return this.a[e.indexOf(encode(t))][1]},HashMap.prototype.length=function(){return this.a.length},HashMap.prototype.toString=function(){for(var t=[],e=0;e<this.length();e++)t.push(JSON.stringify(decode(this.a[e][0]),getCircularReplacer())+" => "+this.a[e][1]);return"HashMap {"+t+"}"};
Also, you can customize the encoder and decoder by changing encode and decode functions.
As in florian's answer, you can't play with the reference in js however (so two empty objects will look like the same to the hashtable).

class Dict{
constructor(){
this.keys = [];
this.values = [];
this.set = this.set.bind(this);
}
set(key, value){
this.keys.push(key);
this.values.push(value);
}
get(key){
return this.values[this.keys.indexOf(key)];
}
all(){
return this.keys.map((kk, ii)=>[kk, this.values[ii]]);
}
}
let d1 = new Dict();
let k1 = {1: 'a'};
d1.set(k1, 2);
console.log(d1.get(k1)); // 2
let k2 = {2: 'b'};
d1.set(k2, 3);
console.log(d1.all());
// [ [ { '1': 'a' }, 2 ], [ { '2': 'b' }, 3 ] ]

Just use the strict equality operator when looking up the object: ===
var objects = [];
objects.push(object1);
objects.push(object2);
objects[0] === object1; // true
objects[1] === object1; // false
The implementation will depend on how you store the objects in the HashTable class.

We Keep Coding

JavaScript is the programming language of the Web.

get Object path "name" [duplicate] - javascript

I know a best practice that using Object.keys(your_object). It will parse to array property name for you. Example: var person = { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Cena', age: '30' }; var listPropertyNames = Object.keys(person); //["firstName", "lastName", "age"] I hope this example is useful for you.

I like one liners, here's a generic solution: const propName = (obj,type) => Object.keys(obj).find(key => obj[key] === type) propName(person, person.age)

Following up on #David Sherret's answer with ES6 it can be made super simple: propName = f => /\.([^\.;]+);?\s*\}$/.exec(f.toString())[1] let prop = propName(() => {obj.name}); // myProperty

I prefer it clean and simple like this: var obj = { sessionId: 123, branchId: 456, seasonId: 789 }; var keys = Object.keys(obj); for (var i in keys) { console.log(keys[i]); //output of keys as string }

No, it's not possible. Imagine this: person.age = 42; person.favoriteNumber = 42; var pn = propName(person.age) // == propName(42) // == propName(person.favoriteNumber); The reference to the property name is simply lost in that process.

Related

Js how to set an item at a nested index in an empty array [duplicate]

typescript : logic to covert string array into custom object

Using the spread operator to copy an object with nested objects [duplicate]

Deep copy in ES6 using the spread syntax

Javascript HashTable use Object key

Categories

Resources