Is it possible to hide the segment squares on paths in paperjs - javascript

When creating path elements in paperJS, the default behavior creates small squares at the intersection of each segment. Is there a way to maintain the default blue path line but hide the squares? A property that can be used to show/hide them?
Draw a line to see an example
http://paperjs.org/examples/path-simplification/

I wondered the same thing a some point but never tried to figure it out until your question. I cant seem to find any documentation on this but it worked on jsfiddle. Try this:
const scope = new paper.PaperScope();
project = new scope.Project(canvasElem);
project.options.handleSize = 0;
Found documentation
I believe the correct approach would be to set this value in scope.settings;
const scope = new paper.PaperScope();
scope.settings.handleSize = 0;
PaperScope.settings.handleSize

Related

Is it possible to place several animated objects into Three.js scene?

I'm quite new to WebGL, and I'm trying to create cake with animated candles. So, I have found this examples: https://stemkoski.github.io/Three.js/Particle-Engine.html with candle flame and tried to change code due to my task (cake). But I struggled with creating several flames into same scene (I found some information how to create cubes or spheres, but unfortunately it is unhelpful in this case).
As far as I understand animated flame displaying is in the code:
this.engine = new ParticleEngine();
engine.setValues( Examples.fountain );
engine.initialize();
but I can't figure out how to create 5 different examples same time.
UPD: I finally created several instances, here is my code:
var engines = [];
var coordinates = [
{x:5, y:105},
{x:-40, y:115},
{x:-75,y:111},
{x:37, y:117},
{x:68, y:110}
];
coordinates.forEach(function(item, i){
var params = clone(Examples.candle);
params.positionBase = new THREE.Vector3(item.x, item.y, 10);
var engine = new ParticleEngine();
engine.setValues(instances[i]);
engine.initialize();
engines.push(engine);
}
But when I tried to set different example (smoke from examples) to one instance all other instance's parameters had been changed too. Can't figure out how to change each instance separately without any influence others.

EaselJS: Update shape color on property change

I am writing a simple game in JS using EaselJS. I try to keep everything object-oriented to keep in sync state of game, state of EaselJS objects and what is displayed on my canvas. I would like to have possibility to change stroke color of shapes that are displayed on canvas by changing their attributes. I've found in docs append() here, but I can't get it working.
Here's what I've achieved so far:
Shape definition:
var bLetter = new createjs.Shape();
bLetter.graphics.append({exec: setPoweredState});
bLetter.graphics.moveTo(0, 0)
.lineTo(0, segSize * 2)
.arc(circSize, segSize * 2, circSize, Math.PI, Math.PI + 0.0001, true);
setPoweredState function - When i set bLetter.powered = true, the line color should change:
setPoweredState = function(ctx, shape) {
if(shape.powered) {
shape.color = consts.COLOR_LINE_ACTIVE;
} else {
shape.color = consts.COLOR_LINE_INACTIVE;
}
shape.graphics.beginStroke(shape.color).setStrokeStyle(consts.STROKE_SIZE, 'round', 'round');
}
When I set bLetter.powered = true and I check bLetter.color it seems that the function is executed - the bLetter.color property changes. However, the bLetter object on canvas is not updated. What's more, it's not drawn at all - probably I am using append() in incorrect way. What am I missing?
BTW: I omit the code with initializing createjs.Stage on canvas and adding bLetter as it's child, I don't think it's an issue, the shape is drawn correctly, only color won't change.
The issue is that you are continually appending new stroke / strokestyle commands to the end of the graphics queue, so they have no effect on the preceding paths.
The easiest approach in my opinion would be to save off the command as Lanny suggested, and modify its style in your setPoweredState method.
Here's an example of the above, implement with minimal modifications to your approach:
https://jsfiddle.net/u4o4hahw/
Instead of using append, consider just storing off commands to modify.
Here is another question that I answered outlining how it works: Injecting a new stroke color into a shape, and here is a blog post: http://blog.createjs.com/new-command-approach-to-easeljs-graphics/
Basically, you can store any command, then change its properties later:
var cmd = shape.graphics.beginFill("red").command;
shape.graphics.otherInstructionsHere();
// Later
cmd.style = "blue";
Here is a link to the docs on the Fill command used in the sample code: http://createjs.com/docs/easeljs/classes/Graphics.Fill.html

How can I add handles to a flat curve in paper.js

I am trying to add handles (handleIn, handleOut) to the segments created in Paper.js using a mousetool like the following:
var myPath = new Path();
myPath.strokeColor = 'black';
function onMouseDown(event) {
myPath.add(event.point);
}
At the end of drawing, I close the polygon, and that is when I would like the handles to be generated. Ideally there is a function or settings that would add the missing handles, but if not, any help pointing me in the right direction for how to calculate the handle positions would be greatly appreciated. I don't want to use smooth() or simplify() since I want the original shape of the polygon to remain. I just want to have handles so that I can add subtle curves to specific line segments if necessary.
Handles can be set using segment.handleIn and segments.handleOut properties.
Handles are stored relative to the segment point, you just have to make sure they are of the length you want. You can then modify them like any other vector/point.
simple demo

Trying to move/animate a container in javascript using the easeljs library

I am trying to adapt the gamefromscratch page showing how to Handling sprite based shooting. But I'm trying to replace the sprite with a bitmap that's in a container. The point where I'm stumbling is the end of the onTick(delta) where there is a graphics object created , I don't know the syntax to replace
var g = new createjs.Graphics();
g.setStrokeStyle(5);
g.beginStroke(createjs.Graphics.getRGB(255,0,0));
g.drawCircle(this.x,this.y,10);
this.bulletGraphic = new createjs.Shape(g);
stage.addChild(this.bulletGraphic);
}
bullets.push(bullet);
with code that would work for a Bitmap In a container.
Thanks for looking .
I believe you are looking for g.beginBitmapStroke() to replace the g.drawCircle()
You can find the EaselJS Documentation here:
http://www.createjs.com/Docs/EaselJS/classes/Graphics.html#yui_3_8_0pr2_2_1363403850534_598
For just using a Bitmap instead of a Shape you could use:
this.bulletGraphic = new createjs.Bitmap('urlOrImage');
stage.addChild(this.bulletGraphic);
}
bullets.push(bullet);
if you want the bullet-Bitmap additionally to be in a container (for whatever reason):
this.bulletGraphic = new createjs.Container();
this.bulletBitmap = new createjs.Bitmap('urlOrImage');
this.bulletGraphic.addChild(this.bulletBitmap);
stage.addChild(this.bulletGraphic);
}
bullets.push(bullet);
A little sidenote from me (note related to your question, but in case you care):
The code-example given on that page explains the Math behind the topic pretty good, but code-wise I would not take this as a good example. For a bullet you would usually create a new class, inheriting from Shape or Bitmap, the author of this example uses a plain object and just references the graphical-asset (this.bulletGraphic) through it. So if you're just using this to learn the Math, this is good, if you want to take this to create a real game out of it, I'd suggest you to restructure the code quite a bit, because this will get messy very soon.

How to remove children from Layer without removing events associated to them - KineticJS

This question is related with one I asked before here. I'm currently using KineticJS 4.0.5 and I'm using multiple layers to display some shapes with different properties. Since I need to change the layers contents frequently I'm using removeChildren to remove a layer content, but it seems that removeChildren also removes the events associated to childrens. I would like to remove the layer childrens without removing their events because I may have to add them to the layer again.
I tried to set the layer.childrens attribute equal to an empty Array instead of using the removeChildren function. At first it seemed to work but on some cases, some weird things happen :/ Some shapes disappear and the only way to get them back is by setting their Z index. I think the main problem with this approach is related with some properties that must be reseted when contents are removed from the layer, but I don't know which are they.
I also tried to set the events again on each shape before drawing them but it doesn't work... They remain static on the screen... I event tried to use the setDraggable(true) on all shapes before drawing them but no luck... Do I need to create the objects again and apply the events to them again each time I want to redraw a layer with shapes I used before? Or would it be a good approach to store layers for each screen on my application? (I can have a lot of different screens, which would result in a lot of layers and only one would be displayed at a time...)
If you know a solution for this problem please tell me. I really need to solve this problem because it is very important for my project to be able to draw and redraw :/
Thank you!
Sounds to me that what you need is a way to visually remove objects from layers, but not actually delete them. Instead of using remove, try creating a new layer specifically for storage, where your main group within that layer is hidden. You'll want this group, and its layer, to be globals for easy access. Then, when you need to remove an object from view, use moveTo to move it into storage, and moveTo again to restore it to view.
var gObj = {storage : '', storageGroup : ''};
gObj.storage = new Kinetic.Layer();
gObj.storageGroup = new Kinetic.Group({name:'storage', x:0, y:0});
gObj.storage.add(gObj.storageGroup);
// assumes stage is already built
stage.add(gObj.storage);
gObj.storageGroup.hide();
function wareHouse(obj, group, store) {
// obj is an object to store when store === true, otherwise it's a name or id when retreiving, group is the group where object either is or needs to be, store is a boolean value
if (store) {
obj.moveTo(gObj.storageGroup);
} else {
// change the dot to pound ('.' = '#') if using id's
var box = gObj.storageGroup.get('.' + obj)[0];
box.moveTo(group);
}
var parent = group.getLayer();
parent.draw();
}

Categories