We Keep Coding

Chunking an array by value with odds and evens

I'm trying to create a function that groups an array of numbers based on a length parameter. The length represents the max length of each sub-array. The code works as it is meant to for getting the sub arrays, but what I'd like to do is make it sort by odd and even.
function myFunctionA(myArr1, myVal) {
newArr = [];
for ( x = 0; x < myArr1.length; x += myVal) {
newArr.push(myArr1.slice(x, x + myVal));
}
return newArr;
}
Console.log(myfunction([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10],3))
This returns [[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9],[10]]
What I'd like to do is go through each sub array at a time until the sub arrays are the correct length and add any leftover values to a sub array/s
This would look like
[[1,3,5][2,4,6][7,9][8,10]]
Since arr 0 and arr 1 are the correct length that we have stated in the console.log statement, 7 8 9 and 10 are left over. But since the can't create a full sub array and they are odds and even, they form two sub arrays with a side of 2.
Other examples:
myfunction([1,2,3,4,5,6,7],2)
Should return [[1,3],[2,4],[5,7],[6]]
myfunction([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8],1)
Should return [[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]]

You could take an array for collecting all odd and even values and then push the group if it has zero items. By having the wanted size, create a new array.
function chunkenator(array, size, fn) {
let groups = [],
result = [];
for (let value of array) {
const group = fn(value);
if (!groups[group]) groups[group] = [];
if (!groups[group].length) result.push(groups[group]);
groups[group].push(value);
if (groups[group].length === size) groups[group] = [];
}
return result;
}
console.log(chunkenator([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], 3, x => x % 2));
console.log(chunkenator([1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15], 3, x => x % 2));

One possibility would be to first seperate the numbers into even and odd numbers and then just loop over it, pushing the numbers into a new array switching between even and odd numbers.
It's not the cleanest piece of code, but it works.
function myfunction(arr, n) {
const evenOdd = arr.reduce((acc, e) => {
const ind = +(e % 2 === 0);
acc[ind] = acc[ind] || [];
acc[ind].push(e);
return acc;
}, []);
let ind = 0, res = [[]];
while (evenOdd[0].length || evenOdd[1].length) {
for (let i = n; i--;) {
const val = evenOdd[ind].shift();
if (val) res[res.length - 1].push(val)
}
ind = (ind + 1) % 2
res.push([])
}
res.pop()
return res;
}
for (const n of [1, 2, 3]) {
console.log(n,
myfunction([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], n)
)
}

How to find elements in array JavaScript where array[i] = i?

I need to find elements in an array of numbers where arr[i] === i, meaning the element must be equal to the array index.
They must be found with using recursion, not just by cycle.
I would be very thankful, if someone help, because I've spent many hours and can't do anything.
I've tried to use Binary Search but it doesn't work. In the end I've got only the empty array.
function fixedPointSearch(arr, low, high) {
let middle = Math.floor((high - low) / 2);
console.log( low, high, middle )
let arrRes = [];
if (arr[middle] === middle)
{ arrRes.push(arr[middle]); }
else if (arr[middle] > middle)
{ fixedPointSearch(arr, middle + 1, high); }
else
{ fixedPointSearch(arr, low, middle - 1); }
return arrRes;
}
const arr1 = [-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17];
console.log(fixedPointSearch(arr1, 0, arr1.length - 1));

To do this recursively, you presumably want to recurse on smaller and smaller arrays, but that means you need to also update the index you're checking on each call. One of the simplest ways to do this is just to include an index in the parameters to your function and increment it on each recursive call. This is one way to do so:
const fixedPointSearch = ([x, ...xs] = [], index = 0) =>
x == undefined
? []
: [... (x === index ? [x] : []), ... fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1)]
console .log (
fixedPointSearch([-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17])
)
It's debatable whether that version or the following one is easier to read, but they are doing essentially the same thing:
const fixedPointSearch = ([x, ...xs] = [], index = 0) =>
x == undefined
? []
: x === index
? [x, ... fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1)]
: // else
fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1)
There is a potential problem, though. Running this over a large array, we could hit the recursion depth limit. If the function were tail-recursive, that problem would simply vanish when JS engines perform tail-call optimization. We don't know when that will be, of course, or even it it will actually ever happen, even though it's been specified for five years. But it sometimes makes sense to write to take advantage of it, on the hope that it will one day become a reality, especially since these will still work as well as the non-tail-call version.
So a tail-recursive version might look like this:
const fixedPointSearch = ([x, ...xs] = [], index = 0, res = []) =>
x == undefined
? res
: fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1, x === index ? [...res, x] : res)

You can solve this w/o additional temporary arrays and parameters, by simply shortening the array in each step:
const myArray = [0, 5, 2, 4, 7, 9, 6];
function fixedPointSearch(arrayToTest) {
if (arrayToTest.length === 0) {
return [];
}
const lastIndex = arrayToTest.length - 1;
const lastItem = arrayToTest[lastIndex];
const remainingItems = arrayToTest.slice(0, lastIndex);
return lastItem === lastIndex
? [...fixedPointSearch(remainingItems), lastItem]
: fixedPointSearch(remainingItems);
}
console.log(fixedPointSearch(myArray));

If you want to find all the elements you should start from the beginning of the array, not the middle and loop through all the indexes.
The idea is for the recursion is to define the end condition.
Then you check if arr[i] === i to update the results array.
Then you make the recursive call with the index incremented and with the updated results array.
function fixedPointSearch(arr, i, results) {
// End condition of the recursion
if (i === arr.length - 1 || arr.length === 0) {
return results;
}
if (arr[i] === i) {
results.push(i);
}
// Recursive call
return fixedPointSearch(arr, i + 1, results);
}
const arr1 = [-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17];
console.log(fixedPointSearch(arr1, 0, []));
console.log(fixedPointSearch([], 0, []));
console.log(fixedPointSearch([9, 8, 7], 0, []));

The idiomatic solution in JavaScript uses Array.prototype.filter -
const run = (a = []) =>
a.filter((x, i) => x === i)
console.log(run([ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ])) // [0,1,2,3,4,5]
console.log(run([ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 ])) // [3]
console.log(run([ 7, 1, 7, 3, 7, 5 ])) // [1,3,5]
console.log(run([ 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 ])) // []
Above it should be clear that recursion isn't required for the job. But there's nothing stopping you from using it, if you wish -
const filter = (test = identity, a = [], i = 0) =>
{ /* base */
if (i >= a.length)
return []
/* inductive: i is in bounds */
if (test(a[i], i))
return [ a[i], ...filter(test, a, i + 1) ]
/* inductive: i is in bounds, a[i] does not pass test */
else
return filter(test, a, i + 1)
}
const run = (a = []) =>
filter((x, i) => x === i, a)
console.log(run([ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ])) // [0,1,2,3,4,5]
console.log(run([ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 ])) // [3]
console.log(run([ 7, 1, 7, 3, 7, 5 ])) // [1,3,5]
console.log(run([ 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 ])) // []

For recursion, you'll need an end condition. Something like
const findElementValueIsPositionInarray = arr => {
let results = [];
const find = i => {
if (arr.length) { // as long as arr has values
const value = arr.shift(); // get value
results = i === value // check it
? results.concat(value)
: results;
return find(i+1); // redo with incremented value of i
}
return results;
};
return find(0);
}
console.log(findElementValueIsPositionInarray([2,3,4,3,9,8]).join());
console.log(findElementValueIsPositionInarray([2,3,4,91,9,8]).join());
console.log(findElementValueIsPositionInarray([0,1,2,87,0,5]).join());
.as-console-wrapper { top: 0; max-height: 100% !important; }

I don't know why you want it through recursion:-
But anyway following should help you:-
let ans = [];
function find(arr,index,ans)
{
if(index==arr.length-1)
{
if(arr[index]==index){
ans.push(arr[index])
}
return;
}
if(arr[index]==index){
ans.push(arr[index])
}
find(arr,index+1,ans);
}
const arr1 = [-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17];
find(arr1,0,ans);
console.log(ans);

Is there a JS function that acts like IntStream in Java? [duplicate]

In PHP, you can do...
range(1, 3); // Array(1, 2, 3)
range("A", "C"); // Array("A", "B", "C")
That is, there is a function that lets you get a range of numbers or characters by passing the upper and lower bounds.
Is there anything built-in to JavaScript natively for this? If not, how would I implement it?

Numbers
[...Array(5).keys()];
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Character iteration
String.fromCharCode(...[...Array('D'.charCodeAt(0) - 'A'.charCodeAt(0) + 1).keys()].map(i => i + 'A'.charCodeAt(0)));
=> "ABCD"
Iteration
for (const x of Array(5).keys()) {
console.log(x, String.fromCharCode('A'.charCodeAt(0) + x));
}
=> 0,"A" 1,"B" 2,"C" 3,"D" 4,"E"
As functions
function range(size, startAt = 0) {
return [...Array(size).keys()].map(i => i + startAt);
}
function characterRange(startChar, endChar) {
return String.fromCharCode(...range(endChar.charCodeAt(0) -
startChar.charCodeAt(0), startChar.charCodeAt(0)))
}
As typed functions
function range(size:number, startAt:number = 0):ReadonlyArray<number> {
return [...Array(size).keys()].map(i => i + startAt);
}
function characterRange(startChar:string, endChar:string):ReadonlyArray<string> {
return String.fromCharCode(...range(endChar.charCodeAt(0) -
startChar.charCodeAt(0), startChar.charCodeAt(0)))
}
lodash.js _.range() function
_.range(10);
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
_.range(1, 11);
=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
_.range(0, 30, 5);
=> [0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
_.range(0, -10, -1);
=> [0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9]
String.fromCharCode(..._.range('A'.charCodeAt(0), 'D'.charCodeAt(0) + 1));
=> "ABCD"
Old non es6 browsers without a library:
Array.apply(null, Array(5)).map(function (_, i) {return i;});
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
console.log([...Array(5).keys()]);
(ES6 credit to nils petersohn and other commenters)

For numbers you can use ES6 Array.from(), which works in everything these days except IE:
Shorter version:
Array.from({length: 20}, (x, i) => i);
Longer version:
Array.from(new Array(20), (x, i) => i);​​​​​​
which creates an array from 0 to 19 inclusive. This can be further shortened to one of these forms:
Array.from(Array(20).keys());
// or
[...Array(20).keys()];
Lower and upper bounds can be specified too, for example:
Array.from(new Array(20), (x, i) => i + *lowerBound*);
An article describing this in more detail: http://www.2ality.com/2014/05/es6-array-methods.html

My new favorite form (ES2015)
Array(10).fill(1).map((x, y) => x + y)
And if you need a function with a step param:
const range = (start, stop, step = 1) =>
Array(Math.ceil((stop - start) / step)).fill(start).map((x, y) => x + y * step)
Another possible implementation suggested by the MDN docs:
// Sequence generator function
// (commonly referred to as "range", e.g. Clojure, PHP etc)
const range = (start, stop, step) =>
Array.from({ length: (stop - start) / step + 1}, (_, i) => start + (i * step))

Here's my 2 cents:
function range(start, end) {
return Array.apply(0, Array(end - 1))
.map((element, index) => index + start);
}

It works for characters and numbers, going forwards or backwards with an optional step.
var range = function(start, end, step) {
var range = [];
var typeofStart = typeof start;
var typeofEnd = typeof end;
if (step === 0) {
throw TypeError("Step cannot be zero.");
}
if (typeofStart == "undefined" || typeofEnd == "undefined") {
throw TypeError("Must pass start and end arguments.");
} else if (typeofStart != typeofEnd) {
throw TypeError("Start and end arguments must be of same type.");
}
typeof step == "undefined" && (step = 1);
if (end < start) {
step = -step;
}
if (typeofStart == "number") {
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(start);
start += step;
}
} else if (typeofStart == "string") {
if (start.length != 1 || end.length != 1) {
throw TypeError("Only strings with one character are supported.");
}
start = start.charCodeAt(0);
end = end.charCodeAt(0);
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(String.fromCharCode(start));
start += step;
}
} else {
throw TypeError("Only string and number types are supported");
}
return range;
}
jsFiddle.
If augmenting native types is your thing, then assign it to Array.range.
var range = function(start, end, step) {
var range = [];
var typeofStart = typeof start;
var typeofEnd = typeof end;
if (step === 0) {
throw TypeError("Step cannot be zero.");
}
if (typeofStart == "undefined" || typeofEnd == "undefined") {
throw TypeError("Must pass start and end arguments.");
} else if (typeofStart != typeofEnd) {
throw TypeError("Start and end arguments must be of same type.");
}
typeof step == "undefined" && (step = 1);
if (end < start) {
step = -step;
}
if (typeofStart == "number") {
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(start);
start += step;
}
} else if (typeofStart == "string") {
if (start.length != 1 || end.length != 1) {
throw TypeError("Only strings with one character are supported.");
}
start = start.charCodeAt(0);
end = end.charCodeAt(0);
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(String.fromCharCode(start));
start += step;
}
} else {
throw TypeError("Only string and number types are supported");
}
return range;
}
console.log(range("A", "Z", 1));
console.log(range("Z", "A", 1));
console.log(range("A", "Z", 3));
console.log(range(0, 25, 1));
console.log(range(0, 25, 5));
console.log(range(20, 5, 5));

Simple range function:
function range(start, stop, step) {
var a = [start], b = start;
while (b < stop) {
a.push(b += step || 1);
}
return a;
}
To incorporate the BigInt data type some check can be included, ensuring that all variables are same typeof start:
function range(start, stop, step) {
var a = [start], b = start;
if (typeof start == 'bigint') {
stop = BigInt(stop)
step = step? BigInt(step): 1n;
} else
step = step || 1;
while (b < stop) {
a.push(b += step);
}
return a;
}
To remove values higher than defined by stop e.g. range(0,5,2) will include 6, which shouldn't be.
function range(start, stop, step) {
var a = [start], b = start;
while (b < stop) {
a.push(b += step || 1);
}
return (b > stop) ? a.slice(0,-1) : a;
}

OK, in JavaScript we don't have a range() function like PHP, so we need to create the function which is quite easy thing, I write couple of one-line functions for you and separate them for Numbers and Alphabets as below:
for Numbers:
function numberRange (start, end) {
return new Array(end - start).fill().map((d, i) => i + start);
}
and call it like:
numberRange(5, 10); //[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
for Alphabets:
function alphabetRange (start, end) {
return new Array(end.charCodeAt(0) - start.charCodeAt(0)).fill().map((d, i) => String.fromCharCode(i + start.charCodeAt(0)));
}
and call it like:
alphabetRange('c', 'h'); //["c", "d", "e", "f", "g"]

Array.range = function(a, b, step){
var A = [];
if(typeof a == 'number'){
A[0] = a;
step = step || 1;
while(a+step <= b){
A[A.length]= a+= step;
}
}
else {
var s = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz';
if(a === a.toUpperCase()){
b = b.toUpperCase();
s = s.toUpperCase();
}
s = s.substring(s.indexOf(a), s.indexOf(b)+ 1);
A = s.split('');
}
return A;
}
Array.range(0,10);
// [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
Array.range(-100,100,20);
// [-100,-80,-60,-40,-20,0,20,40,60,80,100]
Array.range('A','F');
// ['A','B','C','D','E','F')
Array.range('m','r');
// ['m','n','o','p','q','r']

https://stackoverflow.com/a/49577331/8784402
With Delta/Step
smallest and one-liner
[...Array(N)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
Examples and other alternatives
[...Array(10)].map((_, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array.from(Array(10)).map((_, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array.from(Array(10).keys()).map(i => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
[...Array(10).keys()].map(i => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
Array(10).fill(0).map((_, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array(10).fill().map((_, i) => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
Range Function
const range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
range(0, 9, 2);
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
// can also assign range function as static method in Array class (but not recommended )
Array.range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
Array.range(2, 10, 2);
//=> [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
Array.range(0, 10, 1);
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Array.range(2, 10, -1);
//=> []
Array.range(3, 0, -1);
//=> [3, 2, 1, 0]
As Iterators
class Range {
constructor(total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
}
}
[...new Range(5)]; // Five Elements
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
[...new Range(5, 2)]; // Five Elements With Step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
[...new Range(5, -2, 10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From 10
//=>[10, 8, 6, 4, 2]
[...new Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of new Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
As Generators Only
const Range = function* (total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
Array.from(Range(5, -2, -10));
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
[...Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
// Lazy loaded way
const number0toInf = Range(Infinity);
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 0
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 1
// ...
From-To with steps/delta
using iterators
class Range2 {
constructor(to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
}
}
[...new Range2(5)]; // First 5 Whole Numbers
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
[...new Range2(5, 2)]; // From 0 to 5 with step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4]
[...new Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
using Generators
const Range2 = function* (to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
[...Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
let even4to10 = Range2(10, 2, 4);
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 4
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 6
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 8
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 10
even4to10.next().value;
//=> undefined
For Typescript
class _Array<T> extends Array<T> {
static range(from: number, to: number, step: number): number[] {
return Array.from(Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)).map(
(v, k) => from + k * step
);
}
}
_Array.range(0, 9, 1);
https://stackoverflow.com/a/64599169/8784402
Generate Character List with one-liner
const charList = (a,z,d=1)=>(a=a.charCodeAt(),z=z.charCodeAt(),[...Array(Math.floor((z-a)/d)+1)].map((_,i)=>String.fromCharCode(a+i*d)));
console.log("from A to G", charList('A', 'G'));
console.log("from A to Z with step/delta of 2", charList('A', 'Z', 2));
console.log("reverse order from Z to P", charList('Z', 'P', -1));
console.log("from 0 to 5", charList('0', '5', 1));
console.log("from 9 to 5", charList('9', '5', -1));
console.log("from 0 to 8 with step 2", charList('0', '8', 2));
console.log("from α to ω", charList('α', 'ω'));
console.log("Hindi characters from क to ह", charList('क', 'ह'));
console.log("Russian characters from А to Я", charList('А', 'Я'));
For TypeScript
const charList = (p: string, q: string, d = 1) => {
const a = p.charCodeAt(0),
z = q.charCodeAt(0);
return [...Array(Math.floor((z - a) / d) + 1)].map((_, i) =>
String.fromCharCode(a + i * d)
);
};

var range = (l,r) => new Array(r - l).fill().map((_,k) => k + l);

Handy function to do the trick, run the code snippet below
function range(start, end, step, offset) {
var len = (Math.abs(end - start) + ((offset || 0) * 2)) / (step || 1) + 1;
var direction = start < end ? 1 : -1;
var startingPoint = start - (direction * (offset || 0));
var stepSize = direction * (step || 1);
return Array(len).fill(0).map(function(_, index) {
return startingPoint + (stepSize * index);
});
}
console.log('range(1, 5)=> ' + range(1, 5));
console.log('range(5, 1)=> ' + range(5, 1));
console.log('range(5, 5)=> ' + range(5, 5));
console.log('range(-5, 5)=> ' + range(-5, 5));
console.log('range(-10, 5, 5)=> ' + range(-10, 5, 5));
console.log('range(1, 5, 1, 2)=> ' + range(1, 5, 1, 2));
here is how to use it
range (Start, End, Step=1, Offset=0);
inclusive - forward range(5,10) // [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
inclusive - backward range(10,5) // [10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5]
step - backward range(10,2,2) // [10, 8, 6, 4, 2]
exclusive - forward range(5,10,0,-1) // [6, 7, 8, 9] not 5,10 themselves
offset - expand range(5,10,0,1) // [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
offset - shrink range(5,10,0,-2) // [7, 8]
step - expand range(10,0,2,2) // [12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, -2]
hope you find it useful.
And here is how it works.
Basically I'm first calculating the length of the resulting array and create a zero filled array to that length, then fill it with the needed values
(step || 1) => And others like this means use the value of step and if it was not provided use 1 instead
We start by calculating the length of the result array using (Math.abs(end - start) + ((offset || 0) * 2)) / (step || 1) + 1) to put it simpler (difference* offset in both direction/step)
After getting the length, then we create an empty array with initialized values using new Array(length).fill(0); check here
Now we have an array [0,0,0,..] to the length we want. We map over it and return a new array with the values we need by using Array.map(function() {})
var direction = start < end ? 1 : 0; Obviously if start is not smaller than the end we need to move backward. I mean going from 0 to 5 or vice versa
On every iteration, startingPoint + stepSize * index will gives us the value we need

--- UPDATE (Thanks to #lokhmakov for simplification) ---
Another version using ES6 generators ( see great Paolo Moretti answer with ES6 generators ):
const RANGE = (x,y) => Array.from((function*(){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})());
console.log(RANGE(3,7)); // [ 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]
Or, if we only need iterable, then:
const RANGE_ITER = (x,y) => (function*(){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})();
for (let n of RANGE_ITER(3,7)){
console.log(n);
}
// 3
// 4
// 5
// 6
// 7
--- ORGINAL code was: ---
const RANGE = (a,b) => Array.from((function*(x,y){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})(a,b));
and
const RANGE_ITER = (a,b) => (function*(x,y){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})(a,b);

Using Harmony spread operator and arrow functions:
var range = (start, end) => [...Array(end - start + 1)].map((_, i) => start + i);
Example:
range(10, 15);
[ 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ]

If, on Visual Studio Code, you faced the error:
Type 'IterableIterator' is not an array type or a string type. Use compiler option '--downlevelIteration' to allow iterating of iterators.
Instead of
[...Array(3).keys()]
you can rely on
Array.from(Array(3).keys())
More on downlevelIteration

You can use lodash or Undescore.js range:
var range = require('lodash/range')
range(10)
// -> [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]
Alternatively, if you only need a consecutive range of integers you can do something like:
Array.apply(undefined, { length: 10 }).map(Number.call, Number)
// -> [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]
In ES6 range can be implemented with generators:
function* range(start=0, end=null, step=1) {
if (end == null) {
end = start;
start = 0;
}
for (let i=start; i < end; i+=step) {
yield i;
}
}
This implementation saves memory when iterating large sequences, because it doesn't have to materialize all values into an array:
for (let i of range(1, oneZillion)) {
console.log(i);
}

Did some research on some various Range Functions.
Checkout the jsperf comparison of the different ways to do these functions. Certainly not a perfect or exhaustive list, but should help :)
The Winner is...
function range(lowEnd,highEnd){
var arr = [],
c = highEnd - lowEnd + 1;
while ( c-- ) {
arr[c] = highEnd--
}
return arr;
}
range(0,31);
Technically its not the fastest on firefox, but crazy speed difference (imho) on chrome makes up for it.
Also interesting observation is how much faster chrome is with these array functions than firefox. Chrome is at least 4 or 5 times faster.

range(start,end,step): With ES6 Iterators
You only ask for an upper and lower bounds. Here we create one with a step too.
You can easily create range() generator function which can function as an iterator. This means you don't have to pre-generate the entire array.
function * range ( start, end, step = 1 ) {
let state = start;
while ( state < end ) {
yield state;
state += step;
}
return;
};
Now you may want to create something that pre-generates the array from the iterator and returns a list. This is useful for functions that accept an array. For this we can use Array.from()
const generate_array = (start,end,step) =>
Array.from( range(start,end,step) );
Now you can generate a static array easily,
const array1 = generate_array(1,10,2);
const array1 = generate_array(1,7);
But when something desires an iterator (or gives you the option to use an iterator) you can easily create one too.
for ( const i of range(1, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, 7) ) {
console.log(i)
}
Special Notes
If you use Ramda, they have their own R.range as does Lodash

This may not be the best way. But if you are looking to get a range of numbers in a single line of code. For example 10 - 50
Array(40).fill(undefined).map((n, i) => i + 10)
Where 40 is (end - start) and 10 is the start. This should return [10, 11, ..., 50]

Not implemented yet!
Using the new Number.range proposal (stage 1):
[...Number.range(1, 10)]
//=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

(from, to) => [...Array(to - from)].map((_,i)=> i + from)

An interesting challenge would be to write the shortest function to do this. Recursion to the rescue!
function r(a,b){return a>b?[]:[a].concat(r(++a,b))}
Tends to be slow on large ranges, but luckily quantum computers are just around the corner.
An added bonus is that it's obfuscatory. Because we all know how important it is to hide our code from prying eyes.
To truly and utterly obfuscate the function, do this:
function r(a,b){return (a<b?[a,b].concat(r(++a,--b)):a>b?[]:[a]).sort(function(a,b){return a-b})}

I would code something like this:
function range(start, end) {
return Array(end-start).join(0).split(0).map(function(val, id) {return id+start});
}
range(-4,2);
// [-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1]
range(3,9);
// [3,4,5,6,7,8]
It behaves similarly to Python range:
>>> range(-4,2)
[-4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1]

My personal favorite:
const range = (start, end) => new Array(end-start+1).fill().map((el, ind) => ind + start);

ES6
Use Array.from (docs here):
const range = (start, stop, step) => Array.from({ length: (stop - start) / step + 1}, (_, i) => start + (i * step));

A rather minimalistic implementation that heavily employs ES6 can be created as follows, drawing particular attention to the Array.from() static method:
const getRange = (start, stop) => Array.from(
new Array((stop - start) + 1),
(_, i) => i + start
);

The standard Javascript doesn't have a built-in function to generate ranges. Several javascript frameworks add support for such features, or as others have pointed out you can always roll your own.
If you'd like to double-check, the definitive resource is the ECMA-262 Standard.

Though this is not from PHP, but an imitation of range from Python.
function range(start, end) {
var total = [];
if (!end) {
end = start;
start = 0;
}
for (var i = start; i < end; i += 1) {
total.push(i);
}
return total;
}
console.log(range(10)); // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
console.log(range(0, 10)); // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
console.log(range(5, 10)); // [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

This one works also in reverse.
const range = ( a , b ) => Array.from( new Array( b > a ? b - a : a - b ), ( x, i ) => b > a ? i + a : a - i );
range( -3, 2 ); // [ -3, -2, -1, 0, 1 ]
range( 1, -4 ); // [ 1, 0, -1, -2, -3 ]

As far as generating a numeric array for a given range, I use this:
function range(start, stop)
{
var array = [];
var length = stop - start;
for (var i = 0; i <= length; i++) {
array[i] = start;
start++;
}
return array;
}
console.log(range(1, 7)); // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
console.log(range(5, 10)); // [5,6,7,8,9,10]
console.log(range(-2, 3)); // [-2,-1,0,1,2,3]
Obviously, it won't work for alphabetical arrays.

Use this. It creates an array with given amount of values (undefined), in the following example there are 100 indexes, but it is not relevant as here you need only the keys. It uses in the array, 100 + 1, because the arrays are always 0 index based. So if it's given 100 values to generate, the index starts from 0; hence the last value is always 99 not 100.
range(2, 100);
function range(start, end) {
console.log([...Array(end + 1).keys()].filter(value => end >= value && start <= value ));
}

counting number of occurrences in an array [duplicate]

I have an array:
[1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2]
I would like to know how many 2s are in the array.
What is the most elegant way to do it in JavaScript without looping with for loop?

[this answer is a bit dated: read the edits, in the notion of 'equal' in javascript is ambiguous]
Say hello to your friends: map and filter and reduce and forEach and every etc.
(I only occasionally write for-loops in javascript, because of block-level scoping is missing, so you have to use a function as the body of the loop anyway if you need to capture or clone your iteration index or value. For-loops are more efficient generally, but sometimes you need a closure.)
The most readable way:
[....].filter(x => x==2).length
(We could have written .filter(function(x){return x==2}).length instead)
The following is more space-efficient (O(1) rather than O(N)), but I'm not sure how much of a benefit/penalty you might pay in terms of time (not more than a constant factor since you visit each element exactly once):
[....].reduce((total,x) => (x==2 ? total+1 : total), 0)
or as a commenter kindly pointed out:
[....].reduce((total,x) => total+(x==2), 0)
(If you need to optimize this particular piece of code, a for loop might be faster on some browsers... you can test things on jsperf.com.)
You can then be elegant and turn it into a prototype function:
[1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2].count(2)
Like this:
Object.defineProperties(Array.prototype, {
count: {
value: function(value) {
return this.filter(x => x==value).length;
}
}
});
You can also stick the regular old for-loop technique (see other answers) inside the above property definition (again, that would likely be much faster).
2017 edit:
Whoops, this answer has gotten more popular than the correct answer. Actually, just use the accepted answer. While this answer may be cute, the js compilers probably don't (or can't due to spec) optimize such cases. So you should really write a simple for loop:
Object.defineProperties(Array.prototype, {
count: {
value: function(query) {
/*
Counts number of occurrences of query in array, an integer >= 0
Uses the javascript == notion of equality.
*/
var count = 0;
for(let i=0; i<this.length; i++)
if (this[i]==query)
count++;
return count;
}
}
});
You could define a version .countStrictEq(...) which used the === notion of equality. The notion of equality may be important to what you're doing! (for example [1,10,3,'10'].count(10)==2, because numbers like '4'==4 in javascript... hence calling it .countEq or .countNonstrict stresses it uses the == operator.)
Caveat:
Defining a common name on the prototype should be done with care. It is fine if you control your code, but bad if everyone wants to declare their own [].count function, especially if they behave differently. You may ask yourself "but .count(query) surely sounds quite perfect and canonical"... but consider perhaps you could do something like [].count(x=> someExpr of x). In that case you define functions like countIn(query, container) (under myModuleName.countIn), or something, or [].myModuleName_count().
Also consider using your own multiset data structure (e.g. like python's 'collections.Counter') to avoid having to do the counting in the first place. This works for exact matches of the form [].filter(x=> x==???).length (worst case O(N) down to O(1)), and modified will speed up queries of the form [].filter(filterFunction).length (roughly by a factor of #total/#duplicates).
class Multiset extends Map {
constructor(...args) {
super(...args);
}
add(elem) {
if (!this.has(elem))
this.set(elem, 1);
else
this.set(elem, this.get(elem)+1);
}
remove(elem) {
var count = this.has(elem) ? this.get(elem) : 0;
if (count>1) {
this.set(elem, count-1);
} else if (count==1) {
this.delete(elem);
} else if (count==0)
throw `tried to remove element ${elem} of type ${typeof elem} from Multiset, but does not exist in Multiset (count is 0 and cannot go negative)`;
// alternatively do nothing {}
}
}
Demo:
> counts = new Multiset([['a',1],['b',3]])
Map(2) {"a" => 1, "b" => 3}
> counts.add('c')
> counts
Map(3) {"a" => 1, "b" => 3, "c" => 1}
> counts.remove('a')
> counts
Map(2) {"b" => 3, "c" => 1}
> counts.remove('a')
Uncaught tried to remove element a of type string from Multiset, but does not exist in Multiset (count is 0 and cannot go negative)
sidenote: Though, if you still wanted the functional-programming way (or a throwaway one-liner without overriding Array.prototype), you could write it more tersely nowadays as [...].filter(x => x==2).length. If you care about performance, note that while this is asymptotically the same performance as the for-loop (O(N) time), it may require O(N) extra memory (instead of O(1) memory) because it will almost certainly generate an intermediate array and then count the elements of that intermediate array.

Modern JavaScript:
Note that you should always use triple equals === when doing comparison in JavaScript (JS). The triple equals make sure, that JS comparison behaves like double equals == in other languages (there is one exception, see below). The following solution shows how to solve this the functional way, which will ensure that you will never have out of bounds error:
// Let has local scope
let array = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2]
// Functional filter with an Arrow function
// Filter all elements equal to 2 and return the length (count)
array.filter(x => x === 2).length // -> 3
The following anonymous Arrow function (lambda function) in JavaScript:
(x) => {
const k = 2
return k * x
}
may be simplified to this concise form for a single input:
x => 2 * x
where the return is implied.
Always use triple equals: === for comparison in JS, with the exception of when checking for nullability: if (something == null) {} as it includes a check for undefined, if you only use double equals as in this case.

Very simple:
var count = 0;
for(var i = 0; i < array.length; ++i){
if(array[i] == 2)
count++;
}

2017:
If someone is still interested in the question, my solution is the following:
const arrayToCount = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
const result = arrayToCount.filter(i => i === 2).length;
console.log('number of the found elements: ' + result);

Here is an ES2017+ way to get the counts for all array items in O(N):
const arr = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
const counts = {};
arr.forEach((el) => {
counts[el] = counts[el] ? (counts[el] + 1) : 1;
});
You can also optionally sort the output:
const countsSorted = Object.entries(counts).sort(([_, a], [__, b]) => a - b);
console.log(countsSorted) for your example array:
[
[ '2', 3 ],
[ '1', 1 ],
[ '3', 1 ],
[ '5', 1 ],
[ '8', 1 ],
[ '9', 1 ]
]

If you are using lodash or underscore the _.countBy method will provide an object of aggregate totals keyed by each value in the array. You can turn this into a one-liner if you only need to count one value:
_.countBy(['foo', 'foo', 'bar'])['foo']; // 2
This also works fine on arrays of numbers. The one-liner for your example would be:
_.countBy([1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2])[2]; // 3

Weirdest way I can think of doing this is:
(a.length-(' '+a.join(' ')+' ').split(' '+n+' ').join(' ').match(/ /g).length)+1
Where:
a is the array
n is the number to count in the array
My suggestion, use a while or for loop ;-)

Not using a loop usually means handing the process over to some method that does use a loop.
Here is a way our loop hating coder can satisfy his loathing, at a price:
var a=[1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
alert(String(a).replace(/[^2]+/g,'').length);
/* returned value: (Number)
3
*/
You can also repeatedly call indexOf, if it is available as an array method, and move the search pointer each time.
This does not create a new array, and the loop is faster than a forEach or filter.
It could make a difference if you have a million members to look at.
function countItems(arr, what){
var count= 0, i;
while((i= arr.indexOf(what, i))!= -1){
++count;
++i;
}
return count
}
countItems(a,2)
/* returned value: (Number)
3
*/

I'm a begin fan of js array's reduce function.
const myArray =[1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
const count = myArray.reduce((count, num) => num === 2 ? count + 1 : count, 0)
In fact if you really want to get fancy you can create a count function on the Array prototype. Then you can reuse it.
Array.prototype.count = function(filterMethod) {
return this.reduce((count, item) => filterMethod(item)? count + 1 : count, 0);
}
Then do
const myArray =[1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2]
const count = myArray.count(x => x==2)

Most of the posted solutions using array functions such as filter are incomplete because they aren't parameterized.
Here goes a solution with which the element to count can be set at run time.
function elementsCount(elementToFind, total, number){
return total += number==elementToFind;
}
var ar = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
var elementToFind=2;
var result = ar.reduce(elementsCount.bind(this, elementToFind), 0);
The advantage of this approach is that could easily change the function to count for instance the number of elements greater than X.
You may also declare the reduce function inline
var ar = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
var elementToFind=2;
var result = ar.reduce(function (elementToFind, total, number){
return total += number==elementToFind;
}.bind(this, elementToFind), 0);

Really, why would you need map or filter for this?
reduce was "born" for these kind of operations:
[1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2].reduce( (count,2)=>count+(item==val), 0);
that's it! (if item==val in each iteration, then 1 will be added to the accumulator count, as true will resolve to 1).
As a function:
function countInArray(arr, val) {
return arr.reduce((count,item)=>count+(item==val),0)
}
Or, go ahead and extend your arrays:
Array.prototype.count = function(val) {
return this.reduce((count,item)=>count+(item==val),0)
}

It is better to wrap it into function:
let countNumber = (array,specificNumber) => {
return array.filter(n => n == specificNumber).length
}
countNumber([1,2,3,4,5],3) // returns 1

I use this:
function countElement(array, element) {
let tot = 0;
for(var el of array) {
if(el == element) {
tot++;
}
}
return tot;
}
var arr = ["a", "b", "a", "c", "d", "a", "e", "f", "a"];
console.log(countElement(arr, "a")); // 4

var arrayCount = [1,2,3,2,5,6,2,8];
var co = 0;
function findElement(){
arrayCount.find(function(value, index) {
if(value == 2)
co++;
});
console.log( 'found' + ' ' + co + ' element with value 2');
}
I would do something like that:
var arrayCount = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8];
function countarr(){
var dd = 0;
arrayCount.forEach( function(s){
dd++;
});
console.log(dd);
}

I believe what you are looking for is functional approach
const arr = ['a', 'a', 'b', 'g', 'a', 'e'];
const count = arr.filter(elem => elem === 'a').length;
console.log(count); // Prints 3
elem === 'a' is the condition, replace it with your own.

Array.prototype.count = function (v) {
var c = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
if(this[i] === v){
c++;
}
}
return c;
}
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
console.log(arr.count(2)); //3

Solution by recursion
function count(arr, value) {
if (arr.length === 1) {
return arr[0] === value ? 1 : 0;
} else {
return (arr.shift() === value ? 1 : 0) + count(arr, value);
}
}
count([1,2,2,3,4,5,2], 2); // 3

Create a new method for Array class in core level file and use it all over your project.
// say in app.js
Array.prototype.occurrence = function(val) {
return this.filter(e => e === val).length;
}
Use this anywhere in your project -
[1, 2, 4, 5, 2, 7, 2, 9].occurrence(2);
// above line returns 3

Here is a one liner in javascript.
Use map. Find the matching values (v === 2) in the array, returning an array of ones and zeros.
Use Reduce. Add all the values of the array for the total number found.
[1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2]
.map(function(v) {
return v === 2 ? 1 : 0;
})
.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
The result is 3.

Depending on how you want to run it:
const reduced = (array, val) => { // self explanatory
return array.filter((element) => element === val).length;
}
console.log(reduced([1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2], 2));
// 3
const reducer = (array) => { // array to set > set.forEach > map.set
const count = new Map();
const values = new Set(array);
values.forEach((element)=> {
count.set(element, array.filter((arrayElement) => arrayElement === element).length);
});
return count;
}
console.log(reducer([1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2]));
// Map(6) {1 => 1, 2 => 3, 3 => 1, 5 => 1, 8 => 1, …}

You can use built-in function Array.filter()
array.filter(x => x === element).length;
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
// Count how many 2 there are in arr
var count = arr.filter(x => x === 2).length;
console.log(count);

One-liner function
const countBy = (a,f)=>a.reduce((p,v,i,x)=>p+!!f(v,i,x), 0)
countBy([1,2,3,4,5], v=>v%2===0) // 2

There are many ways to find out. I think the easiest way is to use the array filter method which is introduced in es6.
function itemCount(array, item) {
return array.filter(element => element === item).length
}
const myArray = [1,3,5,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,9,0,1]
const items = itemCount(myArray, 1)
console.log(items)

Something a little more generic and modern (in 2022):
import {pipe, count} from 'iter-ops';
const arr = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2];
const n = pipe(arr, count(a => a === 2)).first; //=> 3
What's good about this:
It counts without creating a new array, so it is memory-efficient
It works the same for any Iterable and AsyncIterable

Another approach using RegExp
const list = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2]
const d = 2;
const counter = (`${list.join()},`.match(new RegExp(`${d}\\,`, 'g')) || []).length
console.log(counter)
The Steps follows as below
Join the string using a comma Remember to append ',' after joining so as not to have incorrect values when value to be matched is at the end of the array
Match the number of occurrence of a combination between the digit and comma
Get length of matched items

I believe you can use the new Set array method of JavaScript to have unique values.
Example:
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 5, 2, 8, 9, 2]
var set = new Set(arr);
console.log(set);
// 1,2,3,5,8,9 . We get unique values as output.

You can use length property in JavaScript array:
var myarray = [];
var count = myarray.length;//return 0
myarray = [1,2];
count = myarray.length;//return 2

The right way to create an array with N range? [duplicate]

I'm looking for any alternatives to the below for creating a JavaScript array containing 1 through to N where N is only known at runtime.
var foo = [];
for (var i = 1; i <= N; i++) {
foo.push(i);
}
To me it feels like there should be a way of doing this without the loop.

In ES6 using Array from() and keys() methods.
Array.from(Array(10).keys())
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Shorter version using spread operator.
[...Array(10).keys()]
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Start from 1 by passing map function to Array from(), with an object with a length property:
Array.from({length: 10}, (_, i) => i + 1)
//=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

You can do so:
var N = 10;
Array.apply(null, {length: N}).map(Number.call, Number)
result: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
or with random values:
Array.apply(null, {length: N}).map(Function.call, Math.random)
result: [0.7082694901619107, 0.9572225909214467, 0.8586748542729765,
0.8653848143294454, 0.008339877473190427, 0.9911756622605026, 0.8133423360995948, 0.8377588465809822, 0.5577575915958732, 0.16363654541783035]
Explanation
First, note that Number.call(undefined, N) is equivalent to Number(N), which just returns N. We'll use that fact later.
Array.apply(null, [undefined, undefined, undefined]) is equivalent to Array(undefined, undefined, undefined), which produces a three-element array and assigns undefined to each element.
How can you generalize that to N elements? Consider how Array() works, which goes something like this:
function Array() {
if ( arguments.length == 1 &&
'number' === typeof arguments[0] &&
arguments[0] >= 0 && arguments &&
arguments[0] < 1 << 32 ) {
return [ … ]; // array of length arguments[0], generated by native code
}
var a = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
a.push(arguments[i]);
}
return a;
}
Since ECMAScript 5, Function.prototype.apply(thisArg, argsArray) also accepts a duck-typed array-like object as its second parameter. If we invoke Array.apply(null, { length: N }), then it will execute
function Array() {
var a = [];
for (var i = 0; i < /* arguments.length = */ N; i++) {
a.push(/* arguments[i] = */ undefined);
}
return a;
}
Now we have an N-element array, with each element set to undefined. When we call .map(callback, thisArg) on it, each element will be set to the result of callback.call(thisArg, element, index, array). Therefore, [undefined, undefined, …, undefined].map(Number.call, Number) would map each element to (Number.call).call(Number, undefined, index, array), which is the same as Number.call(undefined, index, array), which, as we observed earlier, evaluates to index. That completes the array whose elements are the same as their index.
Why go through the trouble of Array.apply(null, {length: N}) instead of just Array(N)? After all, both expressions would result an an N-element array of undefined elements. The difference is that in the former expression, each element is explicitly set to undefined, whereas in the latter, each element was never set. According to the documentation of .map():
callback is invoked only for indexes of the array which have assigned values; it is not invoked for indexes which have been deleted or which have never been assigned values.
Therefore, Array(N) is insufficient; Array(N).map(Number.call, Number) would result in an uninitialized array of length N.
Compatibility
Since this technique relies on behaviour of Function.prototype.apply() specified in ECMAScript 5, it will not work in pre-ECMAScript 5 browsers such as Chrome 14 and Internet Explorer 9.

Multiple ways using ES6
Using spread operator (...) and keys method
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map( i => i+1);
Fill/Map
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i+1);
Array.from
Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => i+1)
Array.from and { length: N } hack
Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => i+1)
Note about generalised form
All the forms above can produce arrays initialised to pretty much any desired values by changing i+1 to expression required (e.g. i*2, -i, 1+i*2, i%2 and etc). If expression can be expressed by some function f then the first form becomes simply
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(f)
Examples:
Array.from({length: 5}, (v, k) => k+1);
// [1,2,3,4,5]
Since the array is initialized with undefined on each position, the value of v will be undefined
Example showcasing all the forms
let demo= (N) => {
console.log(
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(( i) => i+1),
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i+1) ,
Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => i+1),
Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => i+1)
)
}
demo(5)
More generic example with custom initialiser function f i.e.
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map((i) => f(i))
or even simpler
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(f)
let demo= (N,f) => {
console.log(
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(f),
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => f(i)) ,
Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => f(i)),
Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => f(i))
)
}
demo(5, i=>2*i+1)

If I get what you are after, you want an array of numbers 1..n that you can later loop through.
If this is all you need, can you do this instead?
var foo = new Array(45); // create an empty array with length 45
then when you want to use it... (un-optimized, just for example)
for(var i = 0; i < foo.length; i++){
document.write('Item: ' + (i + 1) + ' of ' + foo.length + '<br/>');
}
e.g. if you don't need to store anything in the array, you just need a container of the right length that you can iterate over... this might be easier.
See it in action here: http://jsfiddle.net/3kcvm/

Arrays innately manage their lengths. As they are traversed, their indexes can be held in memory and referenced at that point. If a random index needs to be known, the indexOf method can be used.
This said, for your needs you may just want to declare an array of a certain size:
var foo = new Array(N); // where N is a positive integer
/* this will create an array of size, N, primarily for memory allocation,
but does not create any defined values
foo.length // size of Array
foo[ Math.floor(foo.length/2) ] = 'value' // places value in the middle of the array
*/
ES6
Spread
Making use of the spread operator (...) and keys method, enables you to create a temporary array of size N to produce the indexes, and then a new array that can be assigned to your variable:
var foo = [ ...Array(N).keys() ];
Fill/Map
You can first create the size of the array you need, fill it with undefined and then create a new array using map, which sets each element to the index.
var foo = Array(N).fill().map((v,i)=>i);
Array.from
This should be initializing to length of size N and populating the array in one pass.
Array.from({ length: N }, (v, i) => i)
In lieu of the comments and confusion, if you really wanted to capture the values from 1..N in the above examples, there are a couple options:
if the index is available, you can simply increment it by one (e.g., ++i).
in cases where index is not used -- and possibly a more efficient way -- is to create your array but make N represent N+1, then shift off the front.
So if you desire 100 numbers:
let arr; (arr=[ ...Array(101).keys() ]).shift()

In ES6 you can do:
Array(N).fill().map((e,i)=>i+1);
http://jsbin.com/molabiluwa/edit?js,console
Edit:
Changed Array(45) to Array(N) since you've updated the question.
console.log(
Array(45).fill(0).map((e,i)=>i+1)
);

Use the very popular Underscore _.range method
// _.range([start], stop, [step])
_.range(10); // => [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
_.range(1, 11); // => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
_.range(0, 30, 5); // => [0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
_.range(0, -10, -1); // => [0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9]
_.range(0); // => []

function range(start, end) {
var foo = [];
for (var i = start; i <= end; i++) {
foo.push(i);
}
return foo;
}
Then called by
var foo = range(1, 5);
There is no built-in way to do this in Javascript, but it's a perfectly valid utility function to create if you need to do it more than once.
Edit: In my opinion, the following is a better range function. Maybe just because I'm biased by LINQ, but I think it's more useful in more cases. Your mileage may vary.
function range(start, count) {
if(arguments.length == 1) {
count = start;
start = 0;
}
var foo = [];
for (var i = 0; i < count; i++) {
foo.push(start + i);
}
return foo;
}

the fastest way to fill an Array in v8 is:
[...Array(5)].map((_,i) => i);
result will be: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

Performance
Today 2020.12.11 I performed tests on macOS HighSierra 10.13.6 on Chrome v87, Safari v13.1.2 and Firefox v83 for chosen solutions.
Results
For all browsers
solution O (based on while) is the fastest (except Firefox for big N - but it's fast there)
solution T is fastest on Firefox for big N
solutions M,P is fast for small N
solution V (lodash) is fast for big N
solution W,X are slow for small N
solution F is slow
Details
I perform 2 tests cases:
for small N = 10 - you can run it HERE
for big N = 1000000 - you can run it HERE
Below snippet presents all tested solutions A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
function A(N) {
return Array.from({length: N}, (_, i) => i + 1)
}
function B(N) {
return Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i+1);
}
function C(N) {
return Array(N).join().split(',').map((_, i) => i+1 );
}
function D(N) {
return Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => i+1)
}
function E(N) {
return Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => i+1)
}
function F(N) {
return Array.from({length:N}, Number.call, i => i + 1)
}
function G(N) {
return (Array(N)+'').split(',').map((_,i)=> i+1)
}
function H(N) {
return [ ...Array(N).keys() ].map( i => i+1);
}
function I(N) {
return [...Array(N).keys()].map(x => x + 1);
}
function J(N) {
return [...Array(N+1).keys()].slice(1)
}
function K(N) {
return [...Array(N).keys()].map(x => ++x);
}
function L(N) {
let arr; (arr=[ ...Array(N+1).keys() ]).shift();
return arr;
}
function M(N) {
var arr = [];
var i = 0;
while (N--) arr.push(++i);
return arr;
}
function N(N) {
var a=[],b=N;while(b--)a[b]=b+1;
return a;
}
function O(N) {
var a=Array(N),b=0;
while(b<N) a[b++]=b;
return a;
}
function P(N) {
var foo = [];
for (var i = 1; i <= N; i++) foo.push(i);
return foo;
}
function Q(N) {
for(var a=[],b=N;b--;a[b]=b+1);
return a;
}
function R(N) {
for(var i,a=[i=0];i<N;a[i++]=i);
return a;
}
function S(N) {
let foo,x;
for(foo=[x=N]; x; foo[x-1]=x--);
return foo;
}
function T(N) {
return new Uint8Array(N).map((item, i) => i + 1);
}
function U(N) {
return '_'.repeat(5).split('').map((_, i) => i + 1);
}
function V(N) {
return _.range(1, N+1);
}
function W(N) {
return [...(function*(){let i=0;while(i<N)yield ++i})()]
}
function X(N) {
function sequence(max, step = 1) {
return {
[Symbol.iterator]: function* () {
for (let i = 1; i <= max; i += step) yield i
}
}
}
return [...sequence(N)];
}
[A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,U,V,W,X].forEach(f=> {
console.log(`${f.name} ${f(5)}`);
})
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js" integrity="sha512-90vH1Z83AJY9DmlWa8WkjkV79yfS2n2Oxhsi2dZbIv0nC4E6m5AbH8Nh156kkM7JePmqD6tcZsfad1ueoaovww==" crossorigin="anonymous"> </script>
This snippet only presents functions used in performance tests - it does not perform tests itself!
And here are example results for chrome

This question has a lot of complicated answers, but a simple one-liner:
[...Array(255).keys()].map(x => x + 1)
Also, although the above is short (and neat) to write, I think the following is a bit faster
(for a max length of:
127, Int8,
255, Uint8,
32,767, Int16,
65,535, Uint16,
2,147,483,647, Int32,
4,294,967,295, Uint32.
(based on the max integer values), also here's more on Typed Arrays):
(new Uint8Array(255)).map(($,i) => i + 1);
Although this solution is also not so ideal, because it creates two arrays, and uses the extra variable declaration "$" (not sure any way to get around that using this method). I think the following solution is the absolute fastest possible way to do this:
for(var i = 0, arr = new Uint8Array(255); i < arr.length; i++) arr[i] = i + 1;
Anytime after this statement is made, you can simple use the variable "arr" in the current scope;
If you want to make a simple function out of it (with some basic verification):
function range(min, max) {
min = min && min.constructor == Number ? min : 0;
!(max && max.constructor == Number && max > min) && // boolean statements can also be used with void return types, like a one-line if statement.
((max = min) & (min = 0)); //if there is a "max" argument specified, then first check if its a number and if its graeter than min: if so, stay the same; if not, then consider it as if there is no "max" in the first place, and "max" becomes "min" (and min becomes 0 by default)
for(var i = 0, arr = new (
max < 128 ? Int8Array :
max < 256 ? Uint8Array :
max < 32768 ? Int16Array :
max < 65536 ? Uint16Array :
max < 2147483648 ? Int32Array :
max < 4294967296 ? Uint32Array :
Array
)(max - min); i < arr.length; i++) arr[i] = i + min;
return arr;
}
//and you can loop through it easily using array methods if you want
range(1,11).forEach(x => console.log(x));
//or if you're used to pythons `for...in` you can do a similar thing with `for...of` if you want the individual values:
for(i of range(2020,2025)) console.log(i);
//or if you really want to use `for..in`, you can, but then you will only be accessing the keys:
for(k in range(25,30)) console.log(k);
console.log(
range(1,128).constructor.name,
range(200).constructor.name,
range(400,900).constructor.name,
range(33333).constructor.name,
range(823, 100000).constructor.name,
range(10,4) // when the "min" argument is greater than the "max", then it just considers it as if there is no "max", and the new max becomes "min", and "min" becomes 0, as if "max" was never even written
);
so, with the above function, the above super-slow "simple one-liner" becomes the super-fast, even-shorter:
range(1,14000);

Using ES2015/ES6 spread operator
[...Array(10)].map((_, i) => i + 1)
console.log([...Array(10)].map((_, i) => i + 1))

You can use this:
new Array(/*any number which you want*/)
.join().split(',')
.map(function(item, index){ return ++index;})
for example
new Array(10)
.join().split(',')
.map(function(item, index){ return ++index;})
will create following array:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

If you happen to be using d3.js in your app as I am, D3 provides a helper function that does this for you.
So to get an array from 0 to 4, it's as easy as:
d3.range(5)
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
and to get an array from 1 to 5, as you were requesting:
d3.range(1, 5+1)
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Check out this tutorial for more info.

This is probably the fastest way to generate an array of numbers
Shortest
var a=[],b=N;while(b--)a[b]=b+1;
Inline
var arr=(function(a,b){while(a--)b[a]=a;return b})(10,[]);
//arr=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
If you want to start from 1
var arr=(function(a,b){while(a--)b[a]=a+1;return b})(10,[]);
//arr=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
Want a function?
function range(a,b,c){c=[];while(a--)c[a]=a+b;return c}; //length,start,placeholder
var arr=range(10,5);
//arr=[5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]
WHY?
while is the fastest loop
Direct setting is faster than push
[] is faster than new Array(10)
it's short... look the first code. then look at all other functions in here.
If you like can't live without for
for(var a=[],b=7;b>0;a[--b]=b+1); //a=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
or
for(var a=[],b=7;b--;a[b]=b+1); //a=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

If you are using lodash, you can use _.range:
_.range([start=0], end, [step=1])
Creates an array of numbers
(positive and/or negative) progressing from start up to, but not
including, end. A step of -1 is used if a negative start is specified
without an end or step. If end is not specified, it's set to start
with start then set to 0.
Examples:
_.range(4);
// ➜ [0, 1, 2, 3]
_.range(-4);
// ➜ [0, -1, -2, -3]
_.range(1, 5);
// ➜ [1, 2, 3, 4]
_.range(0, 20, 5);
// ➜ [0, 5, 10, 15]
_.range(0, -4, -1);
// ➜ [0, -1, -2, -3]
_.range(1, 4, 0);
// ➜ [1, 1, 1]
_.range(0);
// ➜ []

the new way to filling Array is:
const array = [...Array(5).keys()]
console.log(array)
result will be: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

with ES6 you can do:
// `n` is the size you want to initialize your array
// `null` is what the array will be filled with (can be any other value)
Array(n).fill(null)

Very simple and easy to generate exactly 1 - N
const [, ...result] = Array(11).keys();
console.log('Result:', result);

Final Summary report .. Drrruummm Rolll -
This is the shortest code to generate an Array of size N (here 10) without using ES6. Cocco's version above is close but not the shortest.
(function(n){for(a=[];n--;a[n]=n+1);return a})(10)
But the undisputed winner of this Code golf(competition to solve a particular problem in the fewest bytes of source code) is Niko Ruotsalainen . Using Array Constructor and ES6 spread operator . (Most of the ES6 syntax is valid typeScript, but following is not. So be judicious while using it)
[...Array(10).keys()]

https://stackoverflow.com/a/49577331/8784402
With Delta
For javascript
smallest and one-liner
[...Array(N)].map((v, i) => from + i * step);
Examples and other alternatives
Array.from(Array(10).keys()).map(i => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
[...Array(10).keys()].map(i => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
Array(10).fill(0).map((v, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array(10).fill().map((v, i) => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
[...Array(10)].map((v, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Range Function
const range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
range(0, 9, 2);
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
// can also assign range function as static method in Array class (but not recommended )
Array.range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
Array.range(2, 10, 2);
//=> [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
Array.range(0, 10, 1);
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Array.range(2, 10, -1);
//=> []
Array.range(3, 0, -1);
//=> [3, 2, 1, 0]
As Iterators
class Range {
constructor(total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
}
}
[...new Range(5)]; // Five Elements
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
[...new Range(5, 2)]; // Five Elements With Step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
[...new Range(5, -2, 10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From 10
//=>[10, 8, 6, 4, 2]
[...new Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of new Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
As Generators Only
const Range = function* (total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
Array.from(Range(5, -2, -10));
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
[...Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
// Lazy loaded way
const number0toInf = Range(Infinity);
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 0
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 1
// ...
From-To with steps/delta
using iterators
class Range2 {
constructor(to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
}
}
[...new Range2(5)]; // First 5 Whole Numbers
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
[...new Range2(5, 2)]; // From 0 to 5 with step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4]
[...new Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
using Generators
const Range2 = function* (to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
[...Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
let even4to10 = Range2(10, 2, 4);
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 4
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 6
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 8
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 10
even4to10.next().value;
//=> undefined
For Typescript
class _Array<T> extends Array<T> {
static range(from: number, to: number, step: number): number[] {
return Array.from(Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)).map(
(v, k) => from + k * step
);
}
}
_Array.range(0, 9, 1);

Solution for empty array and with just number in array
const arrayOne = new Array(10);
console.log(arrayOne);
const arrayTwo = [...Array(10).keys()];
console.log(arrayTwo);
var arrayThree = Array.from(Array(10).keys());
console.log(arrayThree);
const arrayStartWithOne = Array.from(Array(10).keys(), item => item + 1);
console.log(arrayStartWithOne)

✅ Simply, this worked for me:
[...Array(5)].map(...)

There is another way in ES6, using Array.from which takes 2 arguments, the first is an arrayLike (in this case an object with length property), and the second is a mapping function (in this case we map the item to its index)
Array.from({length:10}, (v,i) => i)
this is shorter and can be used for other sequences like generating even numbers
Array.from({length:10}, (v,i) => i*2)
Also this has better performance than most other ways because it only loops once through the array.
Check the snippit for some comparisons
// open the dev console to see results
count = 100000
console.time("from object")
for (let i = 0; i<count; i++) {
range = Array.from({length:10}, (v,i) => i )
}
console.timeEnd("from object")
console.time("from keys")
for (let i =0; i<count; i++) {
range = Array.from(Array(10).keys())
}
console.timeEnd("from keys")
console.time("apply")
for (let i = 0; i<count; i++) {
range = Array.apply(null, { length: 10 }).map(function(element, index) { return index; })
}
console.timeEnd("apply")

Fast
This solution is probably fastest it is inspired by lodash _.range function (but my is simpler and faster)
let N=10, i=0, a=Array(N);
while(i<N) a[i++]=i;
console.log(a);
Performance advantages over current (2020.12.11) existing answers based on while/for
memory is allocated once at the beginning by a=Array(N)
increasing index i++ is used - which looks is about 30% faster than decreasing index i-- (probably because CPU cache memory faster in forward direction)
Speed tests with more than 20 other solutions was conducted in this answer

Using new Array methods and => function syntax from ES6 standard (only Firefox at the time of writing).
By filling holes with undefined:
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i + 1);
Array.from turns "holes" into undefined so Array.map works as expected:
Array.from(Array(5)).map((_, i) => i + 1)

In ES6:
Array.from({length: 1000}, (_, i) => i).slice(1);
or better yet (without the extra variable _ and without the extra slice call):
Array.from({length:1000}, Number.call, i => i + 1)
Or for slightly faster results, you can use Uint8Array, if your list is shorter than 256 results (or you can use the other Uint lists depending on how short the list is, like Uint16 for a max number of 65535, or Uint32 for a max of 4294967295 etc. Officially, these typed arrays were only added in ES6 though). For example:
Uint8Array.from({length:10}, Number.call, i => i + 1)
ES5:
Array.apply(0, {length: 1000}).map(function(){return arguments[1]+1});
Alternatively, in ES5, for the map function (like second parameter to the Array.from function in ES6 above), you can use Number.call
Array.apply(0,{length:1000}).map(Number.call,Number).slice(1)
Or, if you're against the .slice here also, you can do the ES5 equivalent of the above (from ES6), like:
Array.apply(0,{length:1000}).map(Number.call, Function("i","return i+1"))

Array(...Array(9)).map((_, i) => i);
console.log(Array(...Array(9)).map((_, i) => i))

for(var i,a=[i=0];i<10;a[i++]=i);
a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

It seems the only flavor not currently in this rather complete list of answers is one featuring a generator; so to remedy that:
const gen = N => [...(function*(){let i=0;while(i<N)yield i++})()]
which can be used thus:
gen(4) // [0,1,2,3]
The nice thing about this is you don't just have to increment... To take inspiration from the answer #igor-shubin gave, you could create an array of randoms very easily:
const gen = N => [...(function*(){let i=0;
while(i++<N) yield Math.random()
})()]
And rather than something lengthy operationally expensive like:
const slow = N => new Array(N).join().split(',').map((e,i)=>i*5)
// [0,5,10,15,...]
you could instead do:
const fast = N => [...(function*(){let i=0;while(i++<N)yield i*5})()]