im a total newbie in js (typescript, mongoDB, node.)
i just found that my code is not behaving as i expected, im getting 6 registers on the mongoDB instead of just one, it should check if the register exists and then update it, i dont know if it is something related to the await / async or i am doing something wrong, thanks in advace, here is my code.
fields.forEach((value) => {
try {
const mongoConnection = new DocumentDbRepository();
let checksIfExists = await mongoConnection.getValue(key, information[uniqueValue]);
if(checksIfExists==null){
let insert = await mongoConnection.insertValue(information);
console.log(insert);
}
if(checksIfExists?.passValue===information.passValue){
console.log('---------update---------');
let sons = Object.values(information.ticketToRide);
information.ticketToRide = sons;
let update = await mongoConnection.updateRegister(information, checksIfExists._id);
console.log(update);
} else {
console.log('---------insert---------');
let sons = Object.values(information.ticketToRide);
information = sons;
let insert = await mongoConnection.insertValue(information);
console.log(insert);
}
} catch (error) {
console.log(error)
}
}
async getValue(uniqueValue: any, keyValue:any) {
if (this._connection == null) {
await this.connect();
}
const db = this._connection.db(DocumentDbRepository.DbName);
const ticketToRide = db.collection("ticketToRide");
const query = {};
query[uniqueValue] = ''+keyValue+'';
const passInfo = await ticketToRide.findOne(query);
return passInfo;
}
async insertValue(information: any) {
if (this._connection == null) {
await this.connect();
}
const db = this._connection.db(DocumentDbRepository.DbName);
const ticketToRide = db.collection("ticketToRide");
let check = await ticketToRide.insertOne(
information
)
return check;
}
First, you don't need to create a connection inside the loop.
Second, mongodb has an update() or updateMany() method that has a special option { upsert: true }. If it is passed, insert will happen automatically.
Usage example:
Person.update( { name: 'Ted' }, { name: 'Ted', age : 50 }, { upsert: true })
I have slash command that collects messages from users. Users should input their nicknames from the game, and then bot should return in embeded 2 teams. I managed to filter and collect nicknames, and call calculation functions. This works if I enter maximum number of nicknames, but now I want to add feature, where I would manually stop collecting by sending message "stop". Now I don't know where to add condition
if(m.content==="stop") {collector.stop();}
const { SlashCommandBuilder } = require("#discordjs/builders");
const { getSummonerProfile } = require("./../functions/summonerData");
const { MessageEmbed } = require("discord.js");
let arrayOfSummoners = [];
let arrayOfNicknames = [];
async function checkIfSummonerExist(m) {
const test = await getSummonerProfile(m.content);
if (test && m.author.bot == false && !arrayOfNicknames.includes(m.content)) {
m.react("👍");
return true;
} else if (test == false && m.author.bot == false) {
m.react("👎");
return false;
}
if (arrayOfNicknames.includes(m.content)) {
m.react("👎");
}
}
module.exports = {
data: new SlashCommandBuilder()
.setName("custom")
.setDescription("Enter the name of the user."),
async execute(interaction) {
await interaction.deferReply();
interaction.editReply("Insert users");
const exampleEmbed = new MessageEmbed()
.setColor("#0099ff")
.setTimestamp();
// `m` is a message object that will be passed through the filter function
const filter = (m) => checkIfSummonerExist(m);
const collector = interaction.channel.createMessageCollector({
filter,
max: 4,
});
if(m.content==="stop")
{
collector.stop();
}
collector.on("collect", (m) => {
arrayOfNicknames.push(m.content);
exampleEmbed.addFields({
name: "Regular field title",
value: m.content, inline:true
});
});
collector.on("end", (collected) => {
interaction.followUp({ embeds: [exampleEmbed] });
});
},
};
If I add this condition in filter fuction (checkIfSummonerExist(m), I get error collector is not defined and I if call it in execute, like in example above, I get error m is not defined
I would put the if statement inside the collector.on callback. Something like this:
collector.on("collect", m => {
if(m.content === "stop") return collector.stop()
// Other code
})
I was coding a leveling system for my discord bot, but encountered a mongoerror on the way, does anyone know why this is occuring? (The addXp function runs whenever someone chatted, the error is logged in the removeTimeout function.) I have used mongoose in many more ways in my code but this hasn't yet occured before, I also did find others' issues with this error but found no fitting solution there.
async function removeTimeout(leveldataid) {
console.log("removetimeout")
await mongo().then(async (mongoose) => {
try {
await levelSchema.findByIdAndUpdate(
leveldataid,
{
_id: leveldataid,
oncooldown: false
},
{upsert: true}
)
} catch(err) {
console.log(err)
} finally {
mongoose.connection.close()
}
})
}
async function addXP(member, guild) {
let data = undefined
let changedleveldata = false
await mongo().then(async (mongoose) => {
try {
data = await levelenabledSchema.findById(guild.id)
if (data) {
if (data.enabled == true) {
let extraxp = Math.floor(Math.random() *20) + 15
let leveldata = await levelSchema.findById(`guild${guild.id}member${member.id}`)
if (!leveldata) {
await levelSchema.findByIdAndUpdate(
`guild${guild.id}member${member.id}`,
{
_id: `guild${guild.id}member${member.id}`,
guild: guild.id,
level: 1,
maxXp: 113,
xp: extraxp,
oncooldown: true
},
{upsert: true}
)
} else {
if (leveldata.oncooldown == false) {
let newlevel = leveldata.level
let newMaxXp = leveldata.maxXp
newMaxXp = Math.floor(newMaxXp)
let xp = leveldata.xp
xp +=extraxp
if (xp > leveldata.maxXp) {
xp -=Math.floor(100*1.135**newlevel)
newlevel++
newMaxXp = 100*1.13**newlevel
}
await levelSchema.findByIdAndUpdate(
`guild${guild.id}member${member.id}`,
{
level: newlevel,
maxXp: newMaxXp,
xp: xp,
oncooldown: true
},
{upsert: true}
)
}
}
}
}
changedleveldata = true
} catch(err) {
console.log(err)
} finally {
mongoose.connection.close()
}
if (changedleveldata == true) {
setTimeout(remoteTimeout(`guild${guild.id}member${member.id}`), 60000)
}
})
}
This basically means the connection between node server and mongoDB was interrupted while writing data.
The solution to your problem would be to remove the finally block from your code because it interrupts the connection when the bot is being used by a lot of users and the bot tries to write data while a previous connection is being closed.
await mongo().then(async (mongoose) => {
try { // code here
} catch(e) { console.log(e); }
});
I am trying to run a AwaitMessage function inside the user's DM's, but its not working. Can anyone help?
Error: TypeError: Cannot read property 'awaitMessages' of undefined
const discord = require('discord.js')
module.exports = {
name: "team",
description: "You can create a new team",
usage: "team",
category: "info",
run: (client, message) => {
const member = message.member;
const user = message.author;
member.send("Do you want continue ? (Yes/No)");
message.dmChannel.awaitMessages(user == message.author, {max: 1 , time: 40000})
.then (collect => {
if (collected.first().content.toLowerCase() == 'yes') {
member.send("Test")
} else {
member.send("Test")
}
});
}
}```
Firstly, I'd recommend using async/await for more than one awaitMessages, as the code can get very nest-y and hard to look at.
Instead of
message.dmChannel.awaitMessages(user == message.author, { max: 1 , time: 40000 })
Use
let collected = await message.dmChannel.awaitMessages(filter, { max: 1, time: 400000 });
If you're trying to only allow the user who triggered the command to pass the filter, just match IDs like this:
let filter = (m) => { m.author.id == message.author.id; }
And lastly, in case a user fails to reply, simply use a try/catch block, like this
let filter = (m) => {
m.author.id == message.author.id;
};
try {
let collected = await message.dmChannel.awaitMessages(filter, {
max: 1,
time: 400000,
});
let response = collected.first().content.toLowerCase();
if (response == "yes") {
member.send("Test");
} else {
member.send("Test");
}
} catch (e) {
return message.reply("Looks like you took too long to reply!");
}
I hope this can serve you.
I'm trying to update a field timestamp with the Firestore admin timestamp in a collection with more than 500 docs.
const batch = db.batch();
const serverTimestamp = admin.firestore.FieldValue.serverTimestamp();
db
.collection('My Collection')
.get()
.then((docs) => {
serverTimestamp,
}, {
merge: true,
})
.then(() => res.send('All docs updated'))
.catch(console.error);
This throws an error
{ Error: 3 INVALID_ARGUMENT: cannot write more than 500 entities in a single call
at Object.exports.createStatusError (C:\Users\Growthfile\Desktop\cf-test\functions\node_modules\grpc\src\common.js:87:15)
at Object.onReceiveStatus (C:\Users\Growthfile\Desktop\cf-test\functions\node_modules\grpc\src\client_interceptors.js:1188:28)
at InterceptingListener._callNext (C:\Users\Growthfile\Desktop\cf-test\functions\node_modules\grpc\src\client_interceptors.js:564:42)
at InterceptingListener.onReceiveStatus (C:\Users\Growthfile\Desktop\cf-test\functions\node_modules\grpc\src\client_interceptors.js:614:8)
at callback (C:\Users\Growthfile\Desktop\cf-test\functions\node_modules\grpc\src\client_interceptors.js:841:24)
code: 3,
metadata: Metadata { _internal_repr: {} },
details: 'cannot write more than 500 entities in a single call' }
Is there a way that I can write a recursive method which creates a batch object updating a batch of 500 docs one by one until all the docs are updated.
From the docs I know that delete operation is possible with the recursive approach as mentioned here:
https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/delete-data#collections
But, for updating, I'm not sure how to end the execution since the docs are not being deleted.
I also ran into the problem to update more than 500 documents inside a Firestore collection. And i would like to share how i solved this problem.
I use cloud functions to update my collection inside Firestore but this should also work on client side code.
The solution counts every operation which is made to the batch and after the limit is reached a new batch is created and pushed to the batchArray.
After all updates are completed the code loops through the batchArray and commits every batch which is inside the array.
It is important to count every operation set(), update(), delete() which is made to the batch because they all count to the 500 operation limit.
const documentSnapshotArray = await firestore.collection('my-collection').get();
const batchArray = [];
batchArray.push(firestore.batch());
let operationCounter = 0;
let batchIndex = 0;
documentSnapshotArray.forEach(documentSnapshot => {
const documentData = documentSnapshot.data();
// update document data here...
batchArray[batchIndex].update(documentSnapshot.ref, documentData);
operationCounter++;
if (operationCounter === 499) {
batchArray.push(firestore.batch());
batchIndex++;
operationCounter = 0;
}
});
batchArray.forEach(async batch => await batch.commit());
return;
I liked this simple solution:
const users = await db.collection('users').get()
const batches = _.chunk(users.docs, 500).map(userDocs => {
const batch = db.batch()
userDocs.forEach(doc => {
batch.set(doc.ref, { field: 'myNewValue' }, { merge: true })
})
return batch.commit()
})
await Promise.all(batches)
Just remember to add import * as _ from "lodash" at the top. Based on this answer.
You can use default BulkWriter. This method used 500/50/5 rule.
Example:
let bulkWriter = firestore.bulkWriter();
bulkWriter.create(documentRef, {foo: 'bar'});
bulkWriter.update(documentRef2, {foo: 'bar'});
bulkWriter.delete(documentRef3);
await close().then(() => {
console.log('Executed all writes');
});
As mentioned above, #Sebastian's answer is good and I upvoted that too. Although faced an issue while updating 25000+ documents in one go.
The tweak to logic is as below.
console.log(`Updating documents...`);
let collectionRef = db.collection('cities');
try {
let batch = db.batch();
const documentSnapshotArray = await collectionRef.get();
const records = documentSnapshotArray.docs;
const index = documentSnapshotArray.size;
console.log(`TOTAL SIZE=====${index}`);
for (let i=0; i < index; i++) {
const docRef = records[i].ref;
// YOUR UPDATES
batch.update(docRef, {isDeleted: false});
if ((i + 1) % 499 === 0) {
await batch.commit();
batch = db.batch();
}
}
// For committing final batch
if (!(index % 499) == 0) {
await batch.commit();
}
console.log('write completed');
} catch (error) {
console.error(`updateWorkers() errored out : ${error.stack}`);
reject(error);
}
Explanations given on previous comments already explain the issue.
I'm sharing the final code that I built and worked for me, since I needed something that worked in a more decoupled manner, instead of the way that most of the solutions presented above do.
import { FireDb } from "#services/firebase"; // = firebase.firestore();
type TDocRef = FirebaseFirestore.DocumentReference;
type TDocData = FirebaseFirestore.DocumentData;
let fireBatches = [FireDb.batch()];
let batchSizes = [0];
let batchIdxToUse = 0;
export default class FirebaseUtil {
static addBatchOperation(
operation: "create",
ref: TDocRef,
data: TDocData
): void;
static addBatchOperation(
operation: "update",
ref: TDocRef,
data: TDocData,
precondition?: FirebaseFirestore.Precondition
): void;
static addBatchOperation(
operation: "set",
ref: TDocRef,
data: TDocData,
setOpts?: FirebaseFirestore.SetOptions
): void;
static addBatchOperation(
operation: "create" | "update" | "set",
ref: TDocRef,
data: TDocData,
opts?: FirebaseFirestore.Precondition | FirebaseFirestore.SetOptions
): void {
// Lines below make sure we stay below the limit of 500 writes per
// batch
if (batchSizes[batchIdxToUse] === 500) {
fireBatches.push(FireDb.batch());
batchSizes.push(0);
batchIdxToUse++;
}
batchSizes[batchIdxToUse]++;
const batchArgs: [TDocRef, TDocData] = [ref, data];
if (opts) batchArgs.push(opts);
switch (operation) {
// Specific case for "set" is required because of some weird TS
// glitch that doesn't allow me to use the arg "operation" to
// call the function
case "set":
fireBatches[batchIdxToUse].set(...batchArgs);
break;
default:
fireBatches[batchIdxToUse][operation](...batchArgs);
break;
}
}
public static async runBatchOperations() {
// The lines below clear the globally available batches so we
// don't run them twice if we call this function more than once
const currentBatches = [...fireBatches];
fireBatches = [FireDb.batch()];
batchSizes = [0];
batchIdxToUse = 0;
await Promise.all(currentBatches.map((batch) => batch.commit()));
}
}
Based on all the above answers, I put together the following pieces of code that one can put into a module in JavaScript back-end and front-end to easily use Firestore batch writes, without worrying about the 500 writes limit.
Back-end (Node.js)
// The Firebase Admin SDK to access Firestore.
const admin = require("firebase-admin");
admin.initializeApp();
// Firestore does not accept more than 500 writes in a transaction or batch write.
const MAX_TRANSACTION_WRITES = 499;
const isFirestoreDeadlineError = (err) => {
console.log({ err });
const errString = err.toString();
return (
errString.includes("Error: 13 INTERNAL: Received RST_STREAM") ||
errString.includes("Error: 4 DEADLINE_EXCEEDED: Deadline exceeded")
);
};
const db = admin.firestore();
// How many transactions/batchWrites out of 500 so far.
// I wrote the following functions to easily use batchWrites wthout worrying about the 500 limit.
let writeCounts = 0;
let batchIndex = 0;
let batchArray = [db.batch()];
// Commit and reset batchWrites and the counter.
const makeCommitBatch = async () => {
console.log("makeCommitBatch");
await Promise.all(batchArray.map((bch) => bch.commit()));
};
// Commit the batchWrite; if you got a Firestore Deadline Error try again every 4 seconds until it gets resolved.
const commitBatch = async () => {
try {
await makeCommitBatch();
} catch (err) {
console.log({ err });
if (isFirestoreDeadlineError(err)) {
const theInterval = setInterval(async () => {
try {
await makeCommitBatch();
clearInterval(theInterval);
} catch (err) {
console.log({ err });
if (!isFirestoreDeadlineError(err)) {
clearInterval(theInterval);
throw err;
}
}
}, 4000);
}
}
};
// If the batchWrite exeeds 499 possible writes, commit and rest the batch object and the counter.
const checkRestartBatchWriteCounts = () => {
writeCounts += 1;
if (writeCounts >= MAX_TRANSACTION_WRITES) {
batchIndex++;
batchArray.push(db.batch());
writeCounts = 0;
}
};
const batchSet = (docRef, docData) => {
batchArray[batchIndex].set(docRef, docData);
checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
};
const batchUpdate = (docRef, docData) => {
batchArray[batchIndex].update(docRef, docData);
checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
};
const batchDelete = (docRef) => {
batchArray[batchIndex].delete(docRef);
checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
};
module.exports = {
admin,
db,
MAX_TRANSACTION_WRITES,
checkRestartBatchWriteCounts,
commitBatch,
isFirestoreDeadlineError,
batchSet,
batchUpdate,
batchDelete,
};
Front-end
// Firestore does not accept more than 500 writes in a transaction or batch write.
const MAX_TRANSACTION_WRITES = 499;
const isFirestoreDeadlineError = (err) => {
return (
err.message.includes("DEADLINE_EXCEEDED") ||
err.message.includes("Received RST_STREAM")
);
};
class Firebase {
constructor(fireConfig, instanceName) {
let app = fbApp;
if (instanceName) {
app = app.initializeApp(fireConfig, instanceName);
} else {
app.initializeApp(fireConfig);
}
this.name = app.name;
this.db = app.firestore();
this.firestore = app.firestore;
// How many transactions/batchWrites out of 500 so far.
// I wrote the following functions to easily use batchWrites wthout worrying about the 500 limit.
this.writeCounts = 0;
this.batch = this.db.batch();
this.isCommitting = false;
}
async makeCommitBatch() {
console.log("makeCommitBatch");
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.isCommitting = true;
await this.batch.commit();
this.writeCounts = 0;
this.batch = this.db.batch();
this.isCommitting = false;
} else {
const batchWaitInterval = setInterval(async () => {
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.isCommitting = true;
await this.batch.commit();
this.writeCounts = 0;
this.batch = this.db.batch();
this.isCommitting = false;
clearInterval(batchWaitInterval);
}
}, 400);
}
}
async commitBatch() {
try {
await this.makeCommitBatch();
} catch (err) {
console.log({ err });
if (isFirestoreDeadlineError(err)) {
const theInterval = setInterval(async () => {
try {
await this.makeCommitBatch();
clearInterval(theInterval);
} catch (err) {
console.log({ err });
if (!isFirestoreDeadlineError(err)) {
clearInterval(theInterval);
throw err;
}
}
}, 4000);
}
}
}
async checkRestartBatchWriteCounts() {
this.writeCounts += 1;
if (this.writeCounts >= MAX_TRANSACTION_WRITES) {
await this.commitBatch();
}
}
async batchSet(docRef, docData) {
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.batch.set(docRef, docData);
await this.checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
} else {
const batchWaitInterval = setInterval(async () => {
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.batch.set(docRef, docData);
await this.checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
clearInterval(batchWaitInterval);
}
}, 400);
}
}
async batchUpdate(docRef, docData) {
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.batch.update(docRef, docData);
await this.checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
} else {
const batchWaitInterval = setInterval(async () => {
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.batch.update(docRef, docData);
await this.checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
clearInterval(batchWaitInterval);
}
}, 400);
}
}
async batchDelete(docRef) {
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.batch.delete(docRef);
await this.checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
} else {
const batchWaitInterval = setInterval(async () => {
if (!this.isCommitting) {
this.batch.delete(docRef);
await this.checkRestartBatchWriteCounts();
clearInterval(batchWaitInterval);
}
}, 400);
}
}
}
No citations or documentation, this code i invented by myself and for me it worked and looks clean, and simple for read and usage. If some one like it, then can use it too.
Better make autotest becose code use private var _ops wich can be changed after packages upgrade. Forexample in old versions its can be _mutations
async function commitBatch(batch) {
const MAX_OPERATIONS_PER_COMMIT = 500;
while (batch._ops.length > MAX_OPERATIONS_PER_COMMIT) {
const batchPart = admin.firestore().batch();
batchPart._ops = batch._ops.splice(0, MAX_OPERATIONS_PER_COMMIT - 1);
await batchPart.commit();
}
await batch.commit();
}
Usage:
const batch = admin.firestore().batch();
batch.delete(someRef);
batch.update(someRef);
...
await commitBatch(batch);
Simple solution
Just fire twice ?
my array is "resultsFinal"
I fire batch once with a limit of 490 , and second with a limit of the lenght of the array ( results.lenght)
Works fine for me :)
How you check it ?
You go to firebase and delete your collection , firebase say you have delete XXX docs , same as the lenght of your array ? Ok so you are good to go
async function quickstart(results) {
// we get results in parameter for get the data inside quickstart function
const resultsFinal = results;
// console.log(resultsFinal.length);
let batch = firestore.batch();
// limit of firebase is 500 requests per transaction/batch/send
for (i = 0; i < 490; i++) {
const doc = firestore.collection('testMore490').doc();
const object = resultsFinal[i];
batch.set(doc, object);
}
await batch.commit();
// const batchTwo = firestore.batch();
batch = firestore.batch();
for (i = 491; i < 776; i++) {
const objectPartTwo = resultsFinal[i];
const doc = firestore.collection('testMore490').doc();
batch.set(doc, objectPartTwo);
}
await batch.commit();
}