Related
I know that in JavaScript you can do:
var oneOrTheOther = someOtherVar || "these are not the droids you are looking for...";
where the variable oneOrTheOther will take on the value of the first expression if it is not null, undefined, or false. In which case it gets assigned to the value of the second statement.
However, what does the variable oneOrTheOther get assigned to when we use the logical AND operator?
var oneOrTheOther = someOtherVar && "some string";
What would happen when someOtherVar is non-false?
What would happen when someOtherVar is false?
Just learning JavaScript and I'm curious as to what would happen with assignment in conjunction with the AND operator.
Basically, the Logical AND operator (&&), will return the value of the second operand if the first is truthy, and it will return the value of the first operand if it is by itself falsy, for example:
true && "foo"; // "foo"
NaN && "anything"; // NaN
0 && "anything"; // 0
Note that falsy values are those that coerce to false when used in boolean context, they are null, undefined, 0, NaN, an empty string, and of course false, anything else coerces to true.
&& is sometimes called a guard operator.
variable = indicator && value
it can be used to set the value only if the indicator is truthy.
Beginners Example
If you are trying to access "user.name" but then this happens:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'name' of undefined
Fear not. You can use ES6 optional chaining on modern browsers today.
const username = user?.name;
See MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Optional_chaining
Here's some deeper explanations on guard operators that may prove useful in understanding.
Before optional chaining was introduced, you would solve this using the && operator in an assignment or often called the guard operator since it "guards" from the undefined error happening.
Here are some examples you may find odd but keep reading as it is explained later.
var user = undefined;
var username = user && user.username;
// no error, "username" assigned value of "user" which is undefined
user = { username: 'Johnny' };
username = user && user.username;
// no error, "username" assigned 'Johnny'
user = { };
username = user && user.username;
// no error, "username" assigned value of "username" which is undefined
Explanation: In the guard operation, each term is evaluated left-to-right one at a time. If a value evaluated is falsy, evaluation stops and that value is then assigned. If the last item is reached, it is then assigned whether or not it is falsy.
falsy means it is any one of these values undefined, false, 0, null, NaN, '' and truthy just means NOT falsy.
Bonus: The OR Operator
The other useful strange assignment that is in practical use is the OR operator which is typically used for plugins like so:
this.myWidget = this.myWidget || (function() {
// define widget
})();
which will only assign the code portion if "this.myWidget" is falsy. This is handy because you can declare code anywhere and multiple times not caring if its been assigned or not previously, knowing it will only be assigned once since people using a plugin might accidentally declare your script tag src multiple times.
Explanation: Each value is evaluated from left-to-right, one at a time. If a value is truthy, it stops evaluation and assigns that value, otherwise, keeps going, if the last item is reached, it is assigned regardless if it is falsy or not.
Extra Credit: Combining && and || in an assignment
You now have ultimate power and can do very strange things such as this very odd example of using it in a palindrome.
function palindrome(s,i) {
return (i=i || 0) < 0 || i >= s.length >> 1 || s[i] == s[s.length - 1 - i] && isPalindrome(s,++i);
}
In depth explanation here: Palindrome check in Javascript
Happy coding.
Quoting Douglas Crockford1:
The && operator produces the value of its first operand if the first operand is falsy. Otherwise it produces the value of the second operand.
1 Douglas Crockford: JavaScript: The Good Parts - Page 16
According to Annotated ECMAScript 5.1 section 11.11:
In case of the Logical OR operator(||),
expr1 || expr2 Returns expr1 if it can be converted to true;
otherwise, returns expr2. Thus, when used with Boolean values, ||
returns true if either operand is true; if both are false, returns
false.
In the given example,
var oneOrTheOther = someOtherVar || "these are not the droids you are looking for...move along";
The result would be the value of someOtherVar, if Boolean(someOtherVar) is true.(Please refer. Truthiness of an expression). If it is false the result would be "these are not the droids you are looking for...move along";
And In case of the Logical AND operator(&&),
Returns expr1 if it can be converted to false; otherwise, returns
expr2. Thus, when used with Boolean values, && returns true if both
operands are true; otherwise, returns false.
In the given example,
case 1: when Boolean(someOtherVar) is false: it returns the value of someOtherVar.
case 2: when Boolean(someOtherVar) is true: it returns "these are not the droids you are looking for...move along".
I see this differently then most answers, so I hope this helps someone.
To calculate an expression involving ||, you can stop evaluating the expression as soon as you find a term that is truthy. In that case, you have two pieces of knowledge, not just one:
Given the term that is truthy, the whole expression evaluates to true.
Knowing 1, you can terminate the evaluation and return the last evaluated term.
For instance, false || 5 || "hello" evaluates up until and including 5, which is truthy, so this expression evaluates to true and returns 5.
So the expression's value is what's used for an if-statement, but the last evaluated term is what is returned when assigning a variable.
Similarly, evaluating an expression with && involves terminating at the first term which is falsy. It then yields a value of false and it returns the last term which was evaluated. (Edit: actually, it returns the last evaluated term which wasn't falsy. If there are none of those, it returns the first.)
If you now read all examples in the above answers, everything makes perfect sense :)
(This is just my view on the matter, and my guess as to how this actually works. But it's unverified.)
I have been seeing && overused here at work for assignment statements. The concern is twofold:
1) The 'indicator' check is sometimes a function with overhead that developers don't account for.
2) It is easy for devs to just see it as a safety check and not consider they are assigning false to their var. I like them to have a type-safe attitude, so I have them change this:
var currentIndex = App.instance && App.instance.rightSideView.getFocusItemIndex();
to this:
var currentIndex = App.instance && App.instance.rightSideView.getFocusItemIndex() || 0;
so they get an integer as expected.
Given this snippet of JavaScript...
var a;
var b = null;
var c = undefined;
var d = 4;
var e = 'five';
var f = a || b || c || d || e;
alert(f); // 4
Can someone please explain to me what this technique is called (my best guess is in the title of this question!)? And how/why it works exactly?
My understanding is that variable f will be assigned the nearest value (from left to right) of the first variable that has a value that isn't either null or undefined, but I've not managed to find much reference material about this technique and have seen it used a lot.
Also, is this technique specific to JavaScript? I know doing something similar in PHP would result in f having a true boolean value, rather than the value of d itself.
See short-circuit evaluation for the explanation. It's a common way of implementing these operators; it is not unique to JavaScript.
This is made to assign a default value, in this case the value of y, if the x variable is falsy.
The boolean operators in JavaScript can return an operand, and not always a boolean result as in other languages.
The Logical OR operator (||) returns the value of its second operand, if the first one is falsy, otherwise the value of the first operand is returned.
For example:
"foo" || "bar"; // returns "foo"
false || "bar"; // returns "bar"
Falsy values are those who coerce to false when used in boolean context, and they are 0, null, undefined, an empty string, NaN and of course false.
Javacript uses short-circuit evaluation for logical operators || and &&. However, it's different to other languages in that it returns the result of the last value that halted the execution, instead of a true, or false value.
The following values are considered falsy in JavaScript.
false
null
"" (empty string)
0
Nan
undefined
Ignoring the operator precedence rules, and keeping things simple, the following examples show which value halted the evaluation, and gets returned as a result.
false || null || "" || 0 || NaN || "Hello" || undefined // "Hello"
The first 5 values upto NaN are falsy so they are all evaluated from left to right, until it meets the first truthy value - "Hello" which makes the entire expression true, so anything further up will not be evaluated, and "Hello" gets returned as a result of the expression. Similarly, in this case:
1 && [] && {} && true && "World" && null && 2010 // null
The first 5 values are all truthy and get evaluated until it meets the first falsy value (null) which makes the expression false, so 2010 isn't evaluated anymore, and null gets returned as a result of the expression.
The example you've given is making use of this property of JavaScript to perform an assignment. It can be used anywhere where you need to get the first truthy or falsy value among a set of values. This code below will assign the value "Hello" to b as it makes it easier to assign a default value, instead of doing if-else checks.
var a = false;
var b = a || "Hello";
You could call the below example an exploitation of this feature, and I believe it makes code harder to read.
var messages = 0;
var newMessagesText = "You have " + messages + " messages.";
var noNewMessagesText = "Sorry, you have no new messages.";
alert((messages && newMessagesText) || noNewMessagesText);
Inside the alert, we check if messages is falsy, and if yes, then evaluate and return noNewMessagesText, otherwise evaluate and return newMessagesText. Since it's falsy in this example, we halt at noNewMessagesText and alert "Sorry, you have no new messages.".
Javascript variables are not typed, so f can be assigned an integer value even though it's been assigned through boolean operators.
f is assigned the nearest value that is not equivalent to false. So 0, false, null, undefined, are all passed over:
alert(null || undefined || false || '' || 0 || 4 || 'bar'); // alerts '4'
There isn't any magic to it. Boolean expressions like a || b || c || d are lazily evaluated. Interpeter looks for the value of a, it's undefined so it's false so it moves on, then it sees b which is null, which still gives false result so it moves on, then it sees c - same story. Finally it sees d and says 'huh, it's not null, so I have my result' and it assigns it to the final variable.
This trick will work in all dynamic languages that do lazy short-circuit evaluation of boolean expressions. In static languages it won't compile (type error). In languages that are eager in evaluating boolean expressions, it'll return logical value (i.e. true in this case).
This question has already received several good answers.
In summary, this technique is taking advantage of a feature of how the language is compiled. That is, JavaScript "short-circuits" the evaluation of Boolean operators and will return the value associated with either the first non-false variable value or whatever the last variable contains. See Anurag's explanation of those values that will evaluate to false.
Using this technique is not good practice for several reasons; however.
Code Readability: This is using Boolean operators, and if the behavior of how this compiles is not understood, then the expected result would be a Boolean value.
Stability: This is using a feature of how the language is compiled that is inconsistent across multiple languages, and due to this it is something that could potentially be targeted for change in the future.
Documented Features: There is an existing alternative that meets this need and is consistent across more languages. This would be the ternary operator:
() ? value 1: Value 2.
Using the ternary operator does require a little more typing, but it clearly distinguishes between the Boolean expression being evaluated and the value being assigned. In addition it can be chained, so the types of default assignments being performed above could be recreated.
var a;
var b = null;
var c = undefined;
var d = 4;
var e = 'five';
var f = ( a ) ? a :
( b ) ? b :
( c ) ? c :
( d ) ? d :
e;
alert(f); // 4
Return output first true value.
If all are false return last false value.
Example:-
null || undefined || false || 0 || 'apple' // Return apple
It's setting the new variable (z) to either the value of x if it's "truthy" (non-zero, a valid object/array/function/whatever it is) or y otherwise. It's a relatively common way of providing a default value in case x doesn't exist.
For example, if you have a function that takes an optional callback parameter, you could provide a default callback that doesn't do anything:
function doSomething(data, callback) {
callback = callback || function() {};
// do stuff with data
callback(); // callback will always exist
}
Its called Short circuit operator.
Short-circuit evaluation says, the second argument is executed or evaluated only if the first argument does not suffice to determine the value of the expression. when the first argument of the OR (||) function evaluates to true, the overall value must be true.
It could also be used to set a default value for function argument.`
function theSameOldFoo(name){
name = name || 'Bar' ;
console.log("My best friend's name is " + name);
}
theSameOldFoo(); // My best friend's name is Bar
theSameOldFoo('Bhaskar'); // My best friend's name is Bhaskar`
It means that if x is set, the value for z will be x, otherwise if y is set then its value will be set as the z's value.
it's the same as
if(x)
z = x;
else
z = y;
It's possible because logical operators in JavaScript doesn't return boolean values but the value of the last element needed to complete the operation (in an OR sentence it would be the first non-false value, in an AND sentence it would be the last one). If the operation fails, then false is returned.
It will evaluate X and, if X is not null, the empty string, or 0 (logical false), then it will assign it to z. If X is null, the empty string, or 0 (logical false), then it will assign y to z.
var x = '';
var y = 'bob';
var z = x || y;
alert(z);
Will output 'bob';
According to the Bill Higgins' Blog post; the Javascript logical OR assignment idiom (Feb. 2007), this behavior is true as of v1.2 (at least)
He also suggests another use for it (quoted):
"lightweight normalization of cross-browser differences"
// determine upon which element a Javascript event (e) occurred
var target = /*w3c*/ e.target || /*IE*/ e.srcElement;
I know that in JavaScript you can do:
var oneOrTheOther = someOtherVar || "these are not the droids you are looking for...";
where the variable oneOrTheOther will take on the value of the first expression if it is not null, undefined, or false. In which case it gets assigned to the value of the second statement.
However, what does the variable oneOrTheOther get assigned to when we use the logical AND operator?
var oneOrTheOther = someOtherVar && "some string";
What would happen when someOtherVar is non-false?
What would happen when someOtherVar is false?
Just learning JavaScript and I'm curious as to what would happen with assignment in conjunction with the AND operator.
Basically, the Logical AND operator (&&), will return the value of the second operand if the first is truthy, and it will return the value of the first operand if it is by itself falsy, for example:
true && "foo"; // "foo"
NaN && "anything"; // NaN
0 && "anything"; // 0
Note that falsy values are those that coerce to false when used in boolean context, they are null, undefined, 0, NaN, an empty string, and of course false, anything else coerces to true.
&& is sometimes called a guard operator.
variable = indicator && value
it can be used to set the value only if the indicator is truthy.
Beginners Example
If you are trying to access "user.name" but then this happens:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'name' of undefined
Fear not. You can use ES6 optional chaining on modern browsers today.
const username = user?.name;
See MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Optional_chaining
Here's some deeper explanations on guard operators that may prove useful in understanding.
Before optional chaining was introduced, you would solve this using the && operator in an assignment or often called the guard operator since it "guards" from the undefined error happening.
Here are some examples you may find odd but keep reading as it is explained later.
var user = undefined;
var username = user && user.username;
// no error, "username" assigned value of "user" which is undefined
user = { username: 'Johnny' };
username = user && user.username;
// no error, "username" assigned 'Johnny'
user = { };
username = user && user.username;
// no error, "username" assigned value of "username" which is undefined
Explanation: In the guard operation, each term is evaluated left-to-right one at a time. If a value evaluated is falsy, evaluation stops and that value is then assigned. If the last item is reached, it is then assigned whether or not it is falsy.
falsy means it is any one of these values undefined, false, 0, null, NaN, '' and truthy just means NOT falsy.
Bonus: The OR Operator
The other useful strange assignment that is in practical use is the OR operator which is typically used for plugins like so:
this.myWidget = this.myWidget || (function() {
// define widget
})();
which will only assign the code portion if "this.myWidget" is falsy. This is handy because you can declare code anywhere and multiple times not caring if its been assigned or not previously, knowing it will only be assigned once since people using a plugin might accidentally declare your script tag src multiple times.
Explanation: Each value is evaluated from left-to-right, one at a time. If a value is truthy, it stops evaluation and assigns that value, otherwise, keeps going, if the last item is reached, it is assigned regardless if it is falsy or not.
Extra Credit: Combining && and || in an assignment
You now have ultimate power and can do very strange things such as this very odd example of using it in a palindrome.
function palindrome(s,i) {
return (i=i || 0) < 0 || i >= s.length >> 1 || s[i] == s[s.length - 1 - i] && isPalindrome(s,++i);
}
In depth explanation here: Palindrome check in Javascript
Happy coding.
Quoting Douglas Crockford1:
The && operator produces the value of its first operand if the first operand is falsy. Otherwise it produces the value of the second operand.
1 Douglas Crockford: JavaScript: The Good Parts - Page 16
According to Annotated ECMAScript 5.1 section 11.11:
In case of the Logical OR operator(||),
expr1 || expr2 Returns expr1 if it can be converted to true;
otherwise, returns expr2. Thus, when used with Boolean values, ||
returns true if either operand is true; if both are false, returns
false.
In the given example,
var oneOrTheOther = someOtherVar || "these are not the droids you are looking for...move along";
The result would be the value of someOtherVar, if Boolean(someOtherVar) is true.(Please refer. Truthiness of an expression). If it is false the result would be "these are not the droids you are looking for...move along";
And In case of the Logical AND operator(&&),
Returns expr1 if it can be converted to false; otherwise, returns
expr2. Thus, when used with Boolean values, && returns true if both
operands are true; otherwise, returns false.
In the given example,
case 1: when Boolean(someOtherVar) is false: it returns the value of someOtherVar.
case 2: when Boolean(someOtherVar) is true: it returns "these are not the droids you are looking for...move along".
I see this differently then most answers, so I hope this helps someone.
To calculate an expression involving ||, you can stop evaluating the expression as soon as you find a term that is truthy. In that case, you have two pieces of knowledge, not just one:
Given the term that is truthy, the whole expression evaluates to true.
Knowing 1, you can terminate the evaluation and return the last evaluated term.
For instance, false || 5 || "hello" evaluates up until and including 5, which is truthy, so this expression evaluates to true and returns 5.
So the expression's value is what's used for an if-statement, but the last evaluated term is what is returned when assigning a variable.
Similarly, evaluating an expression with && involves terminating at the first term which is falsy. It then yields a value of false and it returns the last term which was evaluated. (Edit: actually, it returns the last evaluated term which wasn't falsy. If there are none of those, it returns the first.)
If you now read all examples in the above answers, everything makes perfect sense :)
(This is just my view on the matter, and my guess as to how this actually works. But it's unverified.)
I have been seeing && overused here at work for assignment statements. The concern is twofold:
1) The 'indicator' check is sometimes a function with overhead that developers don't account for.
2) It is easy for devs to just see it as a safety check and not consider they are assigning false to their var. I like them to have a type-safe attitude, so I have them change this:
var currentIndex = App.instance && App.instance.rightSideView.getFocusItemIndex();
to this:
var currentIndex = App.instance && App.instance.rightSideView.getFocusItemIndex() || 0;
so they get an integer as expected.
I have the following snippet of code :
return (AllowableCharacters.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(k)) != -1);
Now, I don't quite get the usage of -1 in this script.
The way the script reads is as follows:
first String.fromCharCode(k) != -1 is executed (k is a key code , I am dynamically getting from some other script).
Then I get the indexof(String.fromCharCode(k) != -1) from AllowableCharacters.
Which is a string something like this:
AllowableCharacters = "abc" ;
I also understand that if the indexof can't find a value in the above string it return -1.
Coming back to my question, however, why the -1 in the script?
EDIT ::
To make my question simpler , how would you read the following line :
String.fromCharCode(k))!=-1
in simple plain english .
EDIT 2::
ok so i just read guffa's answer and made a random script to check , heres the script :
var store = "abcdefgpS";
function check_index(){
console.log(store.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(83)));
};
in the above function the !-1 is excluded , so on console.log , if a match is found we get the indexOf where the character was found and well if a match is not found we get -1 .
NOW , now thats not what we want , what we want is a "tell me if the value is there"(return true) or "tell me if the value is not there"(return false).
so what we do is we change the above script to :
var store = "abcdefgpS";
function check_index(){
console.log(store.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(83)) !-1);
};
which, gives ur true or false values .
now how does :
return (store.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(83)) !-1)
read as :
if (store.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(83)) !-1){
return true;
}else { return false; }
I don't see the if statement in .
return (store.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(83)) !-1);
Thank you,
Alexander
This is a condition that validates whether or not a character is allowed. It will return a boolean (the result of the comparison).
Let's break it down.
First, we get a string from a char code with String.fromCharCode. Presumably we've received this from an input event of some kind.
Next, we get the index of this resulting single-character string in AllowableCharacters using indexOf.
Finally, we test if that result is -1. A test evaluates to a boolean value, and it can be returned from a function just like any other value. A value of -1 indicates that the character is not allowed, so we use != to determine if the character is valid.
You got the order of execution wrong.
First this expression is evaluated: String.fromCharCode(k).
Lets assume that the result is the string "b". That is used in the expression: AllowableCharacters.indexOf("b").
Lets assume that the characer is found at the second character in the string, which has index 1, so the result is 1. That is used in the expression 1 != -1.
As the 1 is not equal to -1, the result is true, which is returned.
In short, the -1 is compared with the result from the indexOf method, as the methods returns -1 when it doesn't find anything.
It's the comparison operator != that causes the value to be true or false. It compares the values, and the result depends on whether they are equal or not. An if statement isn't needed to turn the result into true or false, that's already the value of the comparison expression.
Sometimes you see code like:
if (AllowableCharacters.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(k)) != -1) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
The if statement is superflous in cases like that. The expression in the if statement is already true or false, so it can be returned directly:
return AllowableCharacters.indexOf(String.fromCharCode(k)) != -1;
Given this snippet of JavaScript...
var a;
var b = null;
var c = undefined;
var d = 4;
var e = 'five';
var f = a || b || c || d || e;
alert(f); // 4
Can someone please explain to me what this technique is called (my best guess is in the title of this question!)? And how/why it works exactly?
My understanding is that variable f will be assigned the nearest value (from left to right) of the first variable that has a value that isn't either null or undefined, but I've not managed to find much reference material about this technique and have seen it used a lot.
Also, is this technique specific to JavaScript? I know doing something similar in PHP would result in f having a true boolean value, rather than the value of d itself.
See short-circuit evaluation for the explanation. It's a common way of implementing these operators; it is not unique to JavaScript.
This is made to assign a default value, in this case the value of y, if the x variable is falsy.
The boolean operators in JavaScript can return an operand, and not always a boolean result as in other languages.
The Logical OR operator (||) returns the value of its second operand, if the first one is falsy, otherwise the value of the first operand is returned.
For example:
"foo" || "bar"; // returns "foo"
false || "bar"; // returns "bar"
Falsy values are those who coerce to false when used in boolean context, and they are 0, null, undefined, an empty string, NaN and of course false.
Javacript uses short-circuit evaluation for logical operators || and &&. However, it's different to other languages in that it returns the result of the last value that halted the execution, instead of a true, or false value.
The following values are considered falsy in JavaScript.
false
null
"" (empty string)
0
Nan
undefined
Ignoring the operator precedence rules, and keeping things simple, the following examples show which value halted the evaluation, and gets returned as a result.
false || null || "" || 0 || NaN || "Hello" || undefined // "Hello"
The first 5 values upto NaN are falsy so they are all evaluated from left to right, until it meets the first truthy value - "Hello" which makes the entire expression true, so anything further up will not be evaluated, and "Hello" gets returned as a result of the expression. Similarly, in this case:
1 && [] && {} && true && "World" && null && 2010 // null
The first 5 values are all truthy and get evaluated until it meets the first falsy value (null) which makes the expression false, so 2010 isn't evaluated anymore, and null gets returned as a result of the expression.
The example you've given is making use of this property of JavaScript to perform an assignment. It can be used anywhere where you need to get the first truthy or falsy value among a set of values. This code below will assign the value "Hello" to b as it makes it easier to assign a default value, instead of doing if-else checks.
var a = false;
var b = a || "Hello";
You could call the below example an exploitation of this feature, and I believe it makes code harder to read.
var messages = 0;
var newMessagesText = "You have " + messages + " messages.";
var noNewMessagesText = "Sorry, you have no new messages.";
alert((messages && newMessagesText) || noNewMessagesText);
Inside the alert, we check if messages is falsy, and if yes, then evaluate and return noNewMessagesText, otherwise evaluate and return newMessagesText. Since it's falsy in this example, we halt at noNewMessagesText and alert "Sorry, you have no new messages.".
Javascript variables are not typed, so f can be assigned an integer value even though it's been assigned through boolean operators.
f is assigned the nearest value that is not equivalent to false. So 0, false, null, undefined, are all passed over:
alert(null || undefined || false || '' || 0 || 4 || 'bar'); // alerts '4'
There isn't any magic to it. Boolean expressions like a || b || c || d are lazily evaluated. Interpeter looks for the value of a, it's undefined so it's false so it moves on, then it sees b which is null, which still gives false result so it moves on, then it sees c - same story. Finally it sees d and says 'huh, it's not null, so I have my result' and it assigns it to the final variable.
This trick will work in all dynamic languages that do lazy short-circuit evaluation of boolean expressions. In static languages it won't compile (type error). In languages that are eager in evaluating boolean expressions, it'll return logical value (i.e. true in this case).
This question has already received several good answers.
In summary, this technique is taking advantage of a feature of how the language is compiled. That is, JavaScript "short-circuits" the evaluation of Boolean operators and will return the value associated with either the first non-false variable value or whatever the last variable contains. See Anurag's explanation of those values that will evaluate to false.
Using this technique is not good practice for several reasons; however.
Code Readability: This is using Boolean operators, and if the behavior of how this compiles is not understood, then the expected result would be a Boolean value.
Stability: This is using a feature of how the language is compiled that is inconsistent across multiple languages, and due to this it is something that could potentially be targeted for change in the future.
Documented Features: There is an existing alternative that meets this need and is consistent across more languages. This would be the ternary operator:
() ? value 1: Value 2.
Using the ternary operator does require a little more typing, but it clearly distinguishes between the Boolean expression being evaluated and the value being assigned. In addition it can be chained, so the types of default assignments being performed above could be recreated.
var a;
var b = null;
var c = undefined;
var d = 4;
var e = 'five';
var f = ( a ) ? a :
( b ) ? b :
( c ) ? c :
( d ) ? d :
e;
alert(f); // 4
Return output first true value.
If all are false return last false value.
Example:-
null || undefined || false || 0 || 'apple' // Return apple
It's setting the new variable (z) to either the value of x if it's "truthy" (non-zero, a valid object/array/function/whatever it is) or y otherwise. It's a relatively common way of providing a default value in case x doesn't exist.
For example, if you have a function that takes an optional callback parameter, you could provide a default callback that doesn't do anything:
function doSomething(data, callback) {
callback = callback || function() {};
// do stuff with data
callback(); // callback will always exist
}
Its called Short circuit operator.
Short-circuit evaluation says, the second argument is executed or evaluated only if the first argument does not suffice to determine the value of the expression. when the first argument of the OR (||) function evaluates to true, the overall value must be true.
It could also be used to set a default value for function argument.`
function theSameOldFoo(name){
name = name || 'Bar' ;
console.log("My best friend's name is " + name);
}
theSameOldFoo(); // My best friend's name is Bar
theSameOldFoo('Bhaskar'); // My best friend's name is Bhaskar`
It means that if x is set, the value for z will be x, otherwise if y is set then its value will be set as the z's value.
it's the same as
if(x)
z = x;
else
z = y;
It's possible because logical operators in JavaScript doesn't return boolean values but the value of the last element needed to complete the operation (in an OR sentence it would be the first non-false value, in an AND sentence it would be the last one). If the operation fails, then false is returned.
It will evaluate X and, if X is not null, the empty string, or 0 (logical false), then it will assign it to z. If X is null, the empty string, or 0 (logical false), then it will assign y to z.
var x = '';
var y = 'bob';
var z = x || y;
alert(z);
Will output 'bob';
According to the Bill Higgins' Blog post; the Javascript logical OR assignment idiom (Feb. 2007), this behavior is true as of v1.2 (at least)
He also suggests another use for it (quoted):
"lightweight normalization of cross-browser differences"
// determine upon which element a Javascript event (e) occurred
var target = /*w3c*/ e.target || /*IE*/ e.srcElement;