useState value changes when i call it from child - javascript

I'm creating a timer app built using react-hooks and an array of this timers
I don't understand why timerList changes
Here it is the parent component
const [timerList, setTimerList] = useState([]);
const removeTimer = () => {
console.log("timerList", timerList);
};
return (
<div id="main">
{timerList ? timerList.map((child) => child) : null}
<div className="add-button before">
<button
onClick={() => {
const time = new Date();
time.setSeconds(time.getSeconds() + 0);
setTimerList((timerList) => [
...timerList,
<FullTimer
expiryTimestamp={time}
removeTimer={() => {
removeTimer();
}}
id={window.prompt("Insert timer name") + ` ${timerList.length}`}
key={timerList.length}
/>,
]);
}}
>
The interested child's component part:
<button
onClick={() => {
removeTimer();
}}
>
The child component is a custom timer with some css, and when i call removeTimer the value of timerList (in the parent component) changes, when it should remain the same.
What am I missing?
P.S. the button tags aren't closed because i have some element inside them that use awesome-font

Side note: In general it's considered bad practice to store components in another components state.
But that's not really the problem here. Given your code, it's a simple closure problem.
This:
const removeTimer = () => {
console.log("timerList", timerList);
};
definition closes over the current timerList. So it will log it, as it was when removeTimer was assigned. Currently that's on every render. So it will log the state seemingly one step behind. There's no fix around that, because that's just how closures work.
Provided you actually want to remove a timer, when removeTimer is invoked, you would need to use the callback version of the updater (setTimerList) and pass some identifying value so that you can actually remove the correct one.
This would all be a lot simpler, if you followed the initial advice and don't store the component in the state, but rather it's defining properties.
The following would be a working example (please excuse my typescript):
import React, { useState } from 'react';
type FullTimerProps = {
id: string;
expiryTimestamp: Date;
removeTimer: () => void;
}
const FullTimer = ({expiryTimestamp, removeTimer, id}: FullTimerProps): JSX.Element => {
return (
<div>
<button onClick={removeTimer}>remove</button>
{id}: {expiryTimestamp.toLocaleDateString()}
</div>
);
};
type Timer = {
id: string;
expiryTimestamp: Date;
};
const TimerList = (): JSX.Element => {
const [timerList, setTimerList] = useState<Timer[]>([]);
const removeTimer = (timer: Timer) => {
setTimerList(timerList => timerList.filter(t => t.id !== timer.id));
};
return (
<div id="main">
{timerList.map(timer => (
<FullTimer
key={timer.id}
id={timer.id}
expiryTimestamp={timer.expiryTimestamp}
removeTimer={() => removeTimer(timer)}
/>
))}
<div className="add-button before">
<button
onClick={() =>
setTimerList(timerList => [...timerList, {
id: window.prompt('Insert timer name') + ` ${timerList.length}`,
expiryTimestamp: new Date()
}])}
>Add
</button>
</div>
</div>
);
};

changing this code snippet
setTimerList((timerList) => [
...timerList,
<FullTimer
expiryTimestamp={time}
removeTimer={() => removeTimer()}
id={window.prompt("Insert timer name") + ` ${timerList.length}`}
key={timerList.length}
/>,
]);
to
timerList.push(<FullTimer
expiryTimestamp={time}
removeTimer={() => removeTimer()}
id={window.prompt("Insert timer name") + ` ${timerList.length}`}
key={timerList.length}
/>);
setTimerList([...timerList]);
Fixed the problem you are having. Although this change is not recommended because it is not immutable approach, but it fixes this case.
UPDATE: It turned out that you duplicated the removeTimer function during the setTimerList call which cause the child component to capture the timerList at the moment of assignment. Which is mentioned at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Closures?retiredLocale=vi#closure as mr #yoshi has shown

Try to write your onclick function like this
<button
onClick={() => removeTimer()}
>
Also over here
<FullTimer
expiryTimestamp={time}
removeTimer={() => removeTimer()}

Related

Reactj.s: Item deleted only after refresh | Delete Method

I'm trying to send a delete request to delete an item from an API.
The API request is fine when clicking on the button. But Item get's deleted only after refreshing the browser!
I'm not too sure if I should add any parameter to SetHamsterDeleted for it to work?
This is what my code looks like.
import React, {useState} from "react";
const Hamster = (props) => {
const [hamsterDeleted, setHamsterDeleted] = useState("")
async function deleteHamster(id) {
const response = await fetch(`/hamsters/${id}`, { method: "DELETE" });
setHamsterDeleted()
}
return (
<div>
<p className={props.hamster ? "" : "hide"}>
{hamsterDeleted}
</p>
<button onClick={() => deleteHamster(props.hamster.id)}>Delete</button>
<h2>{props.hamster.name}</h2>
<p>Ålder:{props.hamster.age}</p>
<p>Favorit mat:{props.hamster.favFood}</p>
<p>Matcher:{props.hamster.games}</p>
<img src={'./img/' + props.hamster.imgName} alt="hamster"/>
</div>
)
};
export default Hamster;
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.6.3/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.6.3/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
Imagine you have a parent component (say HamstersList) that returns/renders list of these Hamster components - it would be preferable to declare that deleteHamster method in it, so it could either: a) pass some prop like hidden into every Hamster or b) refetch list of all Hamsters from the API after one got "deleted" c) remove "deleted" hamster from an array that was stored locally in that parent List component.
But since you are trying to archive this inside of Hamster itself, few changes might help you:
change state line to const [hamsterDeleted, setHamsterDeleted] = useState(false)
call setHamsterDeleted(true) inside of deleteHamster method after awaited fetch.
a small tweak of "conditional rendering" inside of return, to actually render nothing when current Hamster has hamsterDeleted set to true:
return hamsterDeleted ? null : (<div>*all your hamster's content here*</div>)
What do you want to do in the case the hamster is deleted? If you don't want to return anything, you can just return null.
I'm not too sure if I should add any parameter to SetHamsterDeleted for it to work?
Yes, I'd make this a boolean instead. Here's an example:
import React, { useState } from "react";
const Hamster = (props) => {
const [hamsterDeleted, setHamsterDeleted] = useState(false);
async function deleteHamster(id) {
const response = await fetch(`/hamsters/${id}`, { method: "DELETE" });
setHamsterDeleted(true);
}
if (hamsterDeleted) return null;
return (
<div>
<p className={props.hamster ? "" : "hide"}>
{hamsterDeleted}
</p>
<button onClick={() => deleteHamster(props.hamster.id)}>Delete</button>
<h2>{props.hamster.name}</h2>
<p>Ålder:{props.hamster.age}</p>
<p>Favorit mat:{props.hamster.favFood}</p>
<p>Matcher:{props.hamster.games}</p>
<img src={'./img/' + props.hamster.imgName} alt="hamster"/>
</div>
);
};
HOWEVER! Having each individual hamster keep track of its deleted state doesn't sound right (of course I don't know all your requirements but it seems odd). I'm guessing that you've got a parent component which is fetching all the hamsters - that would be a better place to keep track of what has been deleted, and what hasn't. That way, if the hamster is deleted, you could just not render that hamster. Something more like this:
const Hamsters = () => {
const [hamsers, setHamsters] = useState([]);
// Load the hamsters when the component loads
useEffect(() => {
const loadHamsters = async () => {
const { data } = await fetch(`/hamsters`, { method: "GET" });
setHamsters(data);
}
loadHamsters();
}, []);
// Shared handler to delete a hamster
const handleDelete = async (id) => {
await fetch(`/hamsters/${id}`, { method: "DELETE" });
setHamsters(prev => prev.filter(h => h.id !== id));
}
return (
<>
{hamsters.map(hamster => (
<Hamster
key={hamster.id}
hamster={hamster}
onDelete={handleDelete}
/>
))}
</>
);
}
Now you can just make the Hamster component a presentational component that only cares about rendering a hamster, eg:
const Hamster = ({ hamster, onDelete }) => {
const handleDelete = () => onDelete(hamster.id);
return (
<div>
<button onClick={handleDelete}>Delete</button>
<h2>{hamster.name}</h2>
<p>Ålder:{hamster.age}</p>
<p>Favorit mat:{hamster.favFood}</p>
<p>Matcher:{hamster.games}</p>
<img src={'./img/' + hamster.imgName} alt="hamster"/>
</div>
);
};

React - TypeError: Cannot read property 'setState' of undefined (Arrow functions)

I am not able to use setState. My code looks something like:
const FormComp = () => {
const [reader, setReader] = React.useState(0);
//rest of the code
};
const Ques1 = () => {
return (
<>
<button onClick={() => {
this.setState({ reader: "1" });
}}>Click</button>
</>
)
};
This is just a short version of the code. I'm facing problem in this. Please someone help me out.
This code is in same file.
UPDATE:
tried setReader but it throws an error saying setReader is not defined
When you use React.useState you don't do this.setState, in this example you would just do:
<button onClick={() => {
setReader("1");
}}>Click</button>
Should use like this:
import React from 'react';
function App() {
const [reader, setReader] = React.useState(0);
const FormComp = () => {
//rest of the code
return <div>Clicked {reader} times</div>
};
const Ques1 = () => {
return (
<button onClick={() => setReader(reader+1)}>Increase</button>
)
};
return (
<div className="App">
<FormComp />
<Ques1 />
</div>
);
}
export default App;
You can set whatever value you want in setReader function.
since you're using the useState hook, you should call setReader instead of this.setState.
When you use react hooks and functional components, you can throw away (by moment) the concepts about this.setState
Instead to use this.setState({ reader: "1" }) for const [reader, setReader] = React.useState(0); useState Hook. You should use setReader(1) or setReader("1") (According to your old "this.setState({reader: "1"})")
Button onClick be like:
<button onClick={() => setReader(1)}>
Click
</button>
There are two issues in your code.
You're using setState while using react hook useState
useState in being used in one component, trying to access it on another component
So, decide where do you need it, or you want to pass it as prop and/or lift state up?
And use:
onClick={() => setReader(1)}

React.js - How to execute function in parent with arguments from child

The question is probably rather unclear, but i did not how to formulate it, maybe that was the reason why i was not able to find solution to this puzzle i have. anyway, here is an example of what i want to accomplish:
<Calendar
tileContent={({ activeStartDate, date, view }) =>
this.renderGames(date, view)
}
/>
This is an example from npm package react-calendar, but i am sure you know what i mean. The param tileContent gets passed function that already has destructured object, and then i run my own function with data i get from that function.
I was thinking that this was done by executing function in child where i would pass an object (or single param, i just use object as an example).
I think what you're looking for are Render Props, not just executing function in parent with args (even though render props do this as well). It would appear your example is using Render Props specifically.
There are some good examples online of using render props in React, also referred to as "Wrapper Components", etc..
An example could be something like:
const { render } = ReactDOM;
class CounterWrapper extends React.Component {
state = {
count: 0
};
increment = () => {
const { count } = this.state;
return this.setState({ count: count + 1 });
};
decrement = () => {
const { count } = this.state;
return this.setState({ count: count - 1 });
};
render() {
const { count } = this.state;
return (
<React.Fragment>
{this.props.wrapperContent({
increment: this.increment,
decrement: this.decrement,
count
})}
</React.Fragment>
);
}
}
class App extends React.Component {
renderApp = (cnt, inc, dec) => {
return (
<div>
<h1>Render Props Counter Example</h1>
<div>
<p>{cnt}</p>
<button type="button" onClick={() => inc()}>
Increment
</button>
<button type="button" onClick={() => dec()}>
Decrement
</button>
</div>
</div>
)
};
render() {
return (
<CounterWrapper
wrapperContent={({ count, increment, decrement }) =>
this.renderApp(count, increment, decrement)
}
/>
);
}
}
render(<App />, document.body);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.6.3/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.6.3/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
It sounds like you want to execute a function that's in the parent component, from a child component with arguments passed from the child.
Here is an example:
const ParentComponent = () => {
const handleClick = (args) => {
console.log(args)
}
return (
<div>
<ChildComponent onClick={handleClick} />
</div>
)
}
const ChildComponent = ({onClick}) => {
const val = 5;
return (
<div>
<button onClick={() => handleClick(val)} name="Click">Click Me</button>
</div>
)
}
This hsould render the child component which is just a button, with an event handler that is sent from the parent. When you click the button, you should get a console log of 5, which is coming from the parent. This is how you would propgate values from the child, up to the parent.

Is it okay to pass (and subscribe to) an observable as a prop in React?

I sometimes like making use of local state in React. I also sometimes feel I'd like to trigger a function that modifies the child state.
Fortunately, it seems trivial to implement this by passing in a simple pubsub/observable/emitter object to the child via a prop, that the child subscribes to. I'm somewhat new to the React eco-system, so I'd like to know if this is acceptable or not.
For example, I'm creating a simple observable object like so:
const usePubSub = () => ({
subscriber: null,
emit() {
if (this.subscriber) this.subscriber();
},
subscribe(callback) {
this.subscriber = callback;
}
});
And then hypothetically using it like this:
function Parent(props) {
const pubsub = usePubSub();
return (
<>
<button type="button" onClick={() => pubsub.emit()}>Click me!</button>
<Child pubsub={pubsub} />
</>
)
}
function Child(props) {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
// !!!!! Danger?
props.pubsub.subscribe(() => setCount(count + 1));
return (
<p>The count is: {count}</p>
)
}
This would effectively allow me to alter the child's inner state with a button on the parent component, and in my testing, seems to work, however, I'm nervous since I can't find examples of anyone else doing something like this. Do you think that this is a good way ?
So the "React way" of accomplishing what you're saying would be more like this:
function Parent(props) {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
<>
<button type="button" onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Click me!</button>
<Child count={count} />
</>
)
}
function Child(props) {
return (
<p>The count is: {props.count}</p>
)
}
You don't need to subscribe to an observable in the child component because the child is already watching the props that are passed into it.

React js onClick can't pass value to method

I want to read the onClick event value properties. But when I click on it, I see something like this on the console:
SyntheticMouseEvent {dispatchConfig: Object, dispatchMarker: ".1.1.0.2.0.0:1", nativeEvent: MouseEvent, type: "click", target
My code is working correctly. When I run I can see {column} but can't get it in the onClick event.
My Code:
var HeaderRows = React.createClass({
handleSort: function(value) {
console.log(value);
},
render: function () {
var that = this;
return(
<tr>
{this.props.defaultColumns.map(function (column) {
return (
<th value={column} onClick={that.handleSort} >{column}</th>
);
})}
{this.props.externalColumns.map(function (column) {
// Multi dimension array - 0 is column name
var externalColumnName = column[0];
return ( <th>{externalColumnName}</th>);
})}
</tr>
);
}
});
How can I pass a value to the onClick event in React js?
Easy Way
Use an arrow function:
return (
<th value={column} onClick={() => this.handleSort(column)}>{column}</th>
);
This will create a new function that calls handleSort with the right params.
Better Way
Extract it into a sub-component.
The problem with using an arrow function in the render call is it will create a new function every time, which ends up causing unneeded re-renders.
If you create a sub-component, you can pass handler and use props as the arguments, which will then re-render only when the props change (because the handler reference now never changes):
Sub-component
class TableHeader extends Component {
handleClick = () => {
this.props.onHeaderClick(this.props.value);
}
render() {
return (
<th onClick={this.handleClick}>
{this.props.column}
</th>
);
}
}
Main component
{this.props.defaultColumns.map((column) => (
<TableHeader
value={column}
onHeaderClick={this.handleSort}
/>
))}
Old Easy Way (ES5)
Use .bind to pass the parameter you want, this way you are binding the function with the Component context :
return (
<th value={column} onClick={this.handleSort.bind(this, column)}>{column}</th>
);
There are nice answers here, and i agree with #Austin Greco (the second option with separate components)
There is another way i like, currying.
What you can do is create a function that accept a parameter (your parameter) and returns another function that accepts another parameter (the click event in this case). then you are free to do with it what ever you want.
ES5:
handleChange(param) { // param is the argument you passed to the function
return function (e) { // e is the event object that returned
};
}
ES6:
handleChange = param => e => {
// param is the argument you passed to the function
// e is the event object that returned
};
And you will use it this way:
<input
type="text"
onChange={this.handleChange(someParam)}
/>
Here is a full example of such usage:
const someArr = ["A", "B", "C", "D"];
class App extends React.Component {
state = {
valueA: "",
valueB: "some initial value",
valueC: "",
valueD: "blah blah"
};
handleChange = param => e => {
const nextValue = e.target.value;
this.setState({ ["value" + param]: nextValue });
};
render() {
return (
<div>
{someArr.map(obj => {
return (
<div>
<label>
{`input ${obj} `}
</label>
<input
type="text"
value={this.state["value" + obj]}
onChange={this.handleChange(obj)}
/>
<br />
<br />
</div>
);
})}
</div>
);
}
}
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
Note that this approach doesn't solve the creation of a new instance on each render.
I like this approach over the other inline handlers as this one is more concise and readable in my opinion.
Edit:
As suggested in the comments below, you can cache / memoize the result of the function.
Here is a naive implementation:
let memo = {};
const someArr = ["A", "B", "C", "D"];
class App extends React.Component {
state = {
valueA: "",
valueB: "some initial value",
valueC: "",
valueD: "blah blah"
};
handleChange = param => {
const handler = e => {
const nextValue = e.target.value;
this.setState({ ["value" + param]: nextValue });
}
if (!memo[param]) {
memo[param] = e => handler(e)
}
return memo[param]
};
render() {
return (
<div>
{someArr.map(obj => {
return (
<div key={obj}>
<label>
{`input ${obj} `}
</label>
<input
type="text"
value={this.state["value" + obj]}
onChange={this.handleChange(obj)}
/>
<br />
<br />
</div>
);
})}
</div>
);
}
}
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="root" />
Nowadays, with ES6, I feel we could use an updated answer.
return (
<th value={column} onClick={()=>this.handleSort(column)} >{column}</th>
);
Basically, (for any that don't know) since onClick is expecting a function passed to it, bind works because it creates a copy of a function. Instead we can pass an arrow function expression that simply invokes the function we want, and preserves this. You should never need to bind the render method in React, but if for some reason you're losing this in one of your component methods:
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.myMethod = this.myMethod.bind(this);
}
[[h/t to #E.Sundin for linking this in a comment]
The top answer (anonymous functions or binding) will work, but it's not the most performant, as it creates a copy of the event handler for every instance generated by the map() function.
This is an explanation of the optimal way to do it from the ESLint-plugin-react:
Lists of Items
A common use case of bind in render is when rendering a list, to have
a separate callback per list item:
const List = props => (
<ul>
{props.items.map(item =>
<li key={item.id} onClick={() => console.log(item.id)}>
...
</li>
)}
</ul>
);
Rather than doing it this way, pull the repeated section into its own
component:
const List = props => (
<ul>
{props.items.map(item =>
<ListItem
key={item.id}
item={item}
onItemClick={props.onItemClick} // assume this is passed down to List
/>
)}
</ul>
);
const ListItem = props => {
const _onClick = () => {
console.log(props.item.id);
}
return (
<li onClick={_onClick}>
...
</li>
);
});
This will speed up rendering, as it avoids the need to create new
functions (through bind calls) on every render.
This is my approach, not sure how bad it is, please comment
In the clickable element
return (
<th value={column} onClick={that.handleSort} data-column={column}> {column}</th>
);
and then
handleSort(e){
this.sortOn(e.currentTarget.getAttribute('data-column'));
}
React Hooks Solution 2022
const arr = [
{ id: 1, txt: 'One' },
{ id: 2, txt: 'Two' },
{ id: 3, txt: 'Three' },
]
const App = () => {
const handleClick = useCallback(
(id) => () => {
console.log("ID: ", id)
},
[],
)
return (
<div>
{arr.map((item) => (
<button onClick={handleClick(item.id)}>{item.txt}</button>
))}
</div>
)
}
You can pass a function to useCallback's return, you can then call your function normally in the render by passing params to it. Works like a charm! Just make sure you set your useCallback's dependency array appropriately.
Best Solution with React >= 16
The cleanest way I've found to call functions with multiple parameters in onClick, onChange etc. without using inline functions is to use the custom data attribute available in React 16 and above versions.
const App = () => {
const onClick = (e) => {
const value1 = e.currentTarget.getAttribute("data-value1")
const value2 = e.currentTarget.getAttribute("data-value2")
const value2 = e.currentTarget.getAttribute("data-value2")
console.log("Values1", value1)
console.log("Values2", value2)
console.log("Values3", value3)
}
return (
<button onClick={onClick} data-value1="a" data-value2="b" data-value3="c" />
)
}
Above example is for a functional component but the implementation is pretty similar even in class components.
This approach doesn't yield unnecessary re-renders because you aren't using inline functions, and you avoid the hassle of binding with this.
It allows you to pass as many values as you would like to use in your function.
If you are passing values as props to your children to be used in the Child Component's onClick, you can use this approach there as well, without creating a wrapper function.
Works with array of objects as well, in cases where you want to pass the id from the object to the onClick, as shown below.
const App = () => {
const [arrState, setArrState] = useState(arr)
const deleteContent = (e) => {
const id = e.currentTarget.getAttribute("data-id")
const tempArr = [...arrState]
const filteredArr = tempArr.filter((item) => item.id !== id)
setArrState(filteredArr)
}
return (
<div>
{arrState.map((item) => (
<React.Fragment key={item.id}>
<p>{item.content}</p>
<button onClick={deleteContent} data-id={item.id}>
Delete
</button>
</React.Fragment>
))}
</div>
)
}
this example might be little different from yours. but i can assure you that this is the best solution you can have for this problem.
i have searched for days for a solution which has no performance issue. and finally came up with this one.
class HtmlComponent extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state={
name:'MrRehman',
};
this.handleClick= this.handleClick.bind(this);
}
handleClick(event) {
const { param } = e.target.dataset;
console.log(param);
//do what you want to do with the parameter
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<h3 data-param="value what you wanted to pass" onClick={this.handleClick}>
{this.state.name}
</h3>
</div>
);
}
}
UPDATE
incase you want to deal with objects that are supposed to be the parameters. you can use JSON.stringify(object) to convert to it to string and add to the data set.
return (
<div>
<h3 data-param={JSON.stringify({name:'me'})} onClick={this.handleClick}>
{this.state.name}
</h3>
</div>
);
Simply create a function like this
function methodName(params) {
//the thing you wanna do
}
and call it in the place you need
<Icon onClick = {() => { methodName(theParamsYouwantToPass);} }/>
class extends React.Component {
onClickDiv = (column) => {
// do stuff
}
render() {
return <div onClick={() => this.onClickDiv('123')} />
}
}
I realize this is pretty late to the party, but I think a much simpler solution could satisfy many use cases:
handleEdit(event) {
let value = event.target.value;
}
...
<button
value={post.id}
onClick={this.handleEdit} >Edit</button>
I presume you could also use a data- attribute.
Simple, semantic.
Making alternate attempt to answer OP's question including e.preventDefault() calls:
Rendered link (ES6)
<a href="#link" onClick={(e) => this.handleSort(e, 'myParam')}>
Component Function
handleSort = (e, param) => {
e.preventDefault();
console.log('Sorting by: ' + param)
}
One more option not involving .bind or ES6 is to use a child component with a handler to call the parent handler with the necessary props. Here's an example (and a link to working example is below):
var HeaderRows = React.createClass({
handleSort: function(value) {
console.log(value);
},
render: function () {
var that = this;
return(
<tr>
{this.props.defaultColumns.map(function (column) {
return (
<TableHeader value={column} onClick={that.handleSort} >
{column}
</TableHeader>
);
})}
{this.props.externalColumns.map(function (column) {
// Multi dimension array - 0 is column name
var externalColumnName = column[0];
return ( <th>{externalColumnName}</th>
);
})}
</tr>);
)
}
});
// A child component to pass the props back to the parent handler
var TableHeader = React.createClass({
propTypes: {
value: React.PropTypes.string,
onClick: React.PropTypes.func
},
render: function () {
return (
<th value={this.props.value} onClick={this._handleClick}
{this.props.children}
</th>
)
},
_handleClick: function () {
if (this.props.onClick) {
this.props.onClick(this.props.value);
}
}
});
The basic idea is for the parent component to pass the onClick function to a child component. The child component calls the onClick function and can access any props passed to it (and the event), allowing you to use any event value or other props within the parent's onClick function.
Here's a CodePen demo showing this method in action.
You can simply do it if you are using ES6.
export default class Container extends Component {
state = {
data: [
// ...
]
}
handleItemChange = (e, data) => {
// here the data is available
// ....
}
render () {
return (
<div>
{
this.state.data.map((item, index) => (
<div key={index}>
<Input onChange={(event) => this.handItemChange(event,
item)} value={item.value}/>
</div>
))
}
</div>
);
}
}
There are couple of ways to pass parameter in event handlers, some are following.
You can use an arrow function to wrap around an event handler and pass parameters:
<button onClick={() => this.handleClick(id)} />
above example is equivalent to calling .bind or you can explicitly call bind.
<button onClick={this.handleClick.bind(this, id)} />
Apart from these two approaches, you can also pass arguments to a function that is defined as a curry function.
handleClick = (id) => () => {
console.log("Hello, your ticket number is", id)
};
<button onClick={this.handleClick(id)} />
Implementing show total count from an object by passing count as a parameter from main to sub components as described below.
Here is MainComponent.js
import React, { Component } from "react";
import SubComp from "./subcomponent";
class App extends Component {
getTotalCount = (count) => {
this.setState({
total: this.state.total + count
})
};
state = {
total: 0
};
render() {
const someData = [
{ name: "one", count: 200 },
{ name: "two", count: 100 },
{ name: "three", count: 50 }
];
return (
<div className="App">
{someData.map((nameAndCount, i) => {
return (
<SubComp
getTotal={this.getTotalCount}
name={nameAndCount.name}
count={nameAndCount.count}
key={i}
/>
);
})}
<h1>Total Count: {this.state.total}</h1>
</div>
);
}
}
export default App;
And Here is SubComp.js
import React, { Component } from 'react';
export default class SubComp extends Component {
calculateTotal = () =>{
this.props.getTotal(this.props.count);
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<p onClick={this.calculateTotal}> Name: {this.props.name} || Count: {this.props.count}</p>
</div>
)
}
};
Try to implement above and you will get exact scenario that how pass parameters works in reactjs on any DOM method.
I wrote a wrapper component that can be reused for this purpose that builds on the accepted answers here. If all you need to do is pass a string however, then just add a data-attribute and read it from e.target.dataset (like some others have suggested). By default my wrapper will bind to any prop that is a function and starts with 'on' and automatically pass the data prop back to the caller after all the other event arguments. Although I haven't tested it for performance, it will give you the opportunity to avoid creating the class yourself, and it can be used like this:
const DataButton = withData('button')
const DataInput = withData('input');
or for Components and functions
const DataInput = withData(SomeComponent);
or if you prefer
const DataButton = withData(<button/>)
declare that Outside your container (near your imports)
Here is usage in a container:
import withData from './withData';
const DataInput = withData('input');
export default class Container extends Component {
state = {
data: [
// ...
]
}
handleItemChange = (e, data) => {
// here the data is available
// ....
}
render () {
return (
<div>
{
this.state.data.map((item, index) => (
<div key={index}>
<DataInput data={item} onChange={this.handleItemChange} value={item.value}/>
</div>
))
}
</div>
);
}
}
Here is the wrapper code 'withData.js:
import React, { Component } from 'react';
const defaultOptions = {
events: undefined,
}
export default (Target, options) => {
Target = React.isValidElement(Target) ? Target.type : Target;
options = { ...defaultOptions, ...options }
class WithData extends Component {
constructor(props, context){
super(props, context);
this.handlers = getHandlers(options.events, this);
}
render() {
const { data, children, ...props } = this.props;
return <Target {...props} {...this.handlers} >{children}</Target>;
}
static displayName = `withData(${Target.displayName || Target.name || 'Component'})`
}
return WithData;
}
function getHandlers(events, thisContext) {
if(!events)
events = Object.keys(thisContext.props).filter(prop => prop.startsWith('on') && typeof thisContext.props[prop] === 'function')
else if (typeof events === 'string')
events = [events];
return events.reduce((result, eventType) => {
result[eventType] = (...args) => thisContext.props[eventType](...args, thisContext.props.data);
return result;
}, {});
}
I have below 3 suggestion to this on JSX onClick Events -
Actually, we don't need to use .bind() or Arrow function in our code. You can simple use in your code.
You can also move onClick event from th(or ul) to tr(or li) to improve the performance. Basically you will have n number of "Event Listeners" for your n li element.
So finally code will look like this:
<ul onClick={this.onItemClick}>
{this.props.items.map(item =>
<li key={item.id} data-itemid={item.id}>
...
</li>
)}
</ul>
// And you can access item.id in onItemClick method as shown below:
onItemClick = (event) => {
console.log(e.target.getAttribute("item.id"));
}
I agree with the approach mention above for creating separate React Component for ListItem and List. This make code looks good however if you have 1000 of li then 1000 Event Listeners will be created. Please make sure you should not have much event listener.
import React from "react";
import ListItem from "./ListItem";
export default class List extends React.Component {
/**
* This List react component is generic component which take props as list of items and also provide onlick
* callback name handleItemClick
* #param {String} item - item object passed to caller
*/
handleItemClick = (item) => {
if (this.props.onItemClick) {
this.props.onItemClick(item);
}
}
/**
* render method will take list of items as a props and include ListItem component
* #returns {string} - return the list of items
*/
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.items.map(item =>
<ListItem key={item.id} item={item} onItemClick={this.handleItemClick}/>
)}
</div>
);
}
}
import React from "react";
export default class ListItem extends React.Component {
/**
* This List react component is generic component which take props as item and also provide onlick
* callback name handleItemClick
* #param {String} item - item object passed to caller
*/
handleItemClick = () => {
if (this.props.item && this.props.onItemClick) {
this.props.onItemClick(this.props.item);
}
}
/**
* render method will take item as a props and print in li
* #returns {string} - return the list of items
*/
render() {
return (
<li key={this.props.item.id} onClick={this.handleItemClick}>{this.props.item.text}</li>
);
}
}
I have added code for onclick event value pass to the method in two ways . 1 . using bind method 2. using arrow(=>) method . see the methods handlesort1 and handlesort
var HeaderRows = React.createClass({
getInitialState : function() {
return ({
defaultColumns : ["col1","col2","col2","col3","col4","col5" ],
externalColumns : ["ecol1","ecol2","ecol2","ecol3","ecol4","ecol5" ],
})
},
handleSort: function(column,that) {
console.log(column);
alert(""+JSON.stringify(column));
},
handleSort1: function(column) {
console.log(column);
alert(""+JSON.stringify(column));
},
render: function () {
var that = this;
return(
<div>
<div>Using bind method</div>
{this.state.defaultColumns.map(function (column) {
return (
<div value={column} style={{height : '40' }}onClick={that.handleSort.bind(that,column)} >{column}</div>
);
})}
<div>Using Arrow method</div>
{this.state.defaultColumns.map(function (column) {
return (
<div value={column} style={{height : 40}} onClick={() => that.handleSort1(column)} >{column}</div>
);
})}
{this.state.externalColumns.map(function (column) {
// Multi dimension array - 0 is column name
var externalColumnName = column;
return (<div><span>{externalColumnName}</span></div>
);
})}
</div>);
}
});
Below is the example which passes value on onClick event.
I used es6 syntax. remember in class component arrow function does not bind automatically, so explicitly binding in constructor.
class HeaderRows extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleSort = this.handleSort.bind(this);
}
handleSort(value) {
console.log(value);
}
render() {
return(
<tr>
{this.props.defaultColumns.map( (column, index) =>
<th value={ column }
key={ index }
onClick={ () => this.handleSort(event.target.value) }>
{ column }
</th>
)}
{this.props.externalColumns.map((column, index) =>
<th value ={ column[0] }
key={ index }>
{column[0]}
</th>
)}
</tr>
);
}
}
I guess you will have to bind the method to the React’s class instance. It’s safer to use a constructor to bind all methods in React. In your case when you pass the parameter to the method, the first parameter is used to bind the ‘this’ context of the method, thus you cannot access the value inside the method.
1. You just have to use an arrow function in the Onclick event like this:
<th value={column} onClick={() => that.handleSort(theValue)} >{column}</th>
2.Then bind this in the constructor method:
this.handleSort = this.handleSort.bind(this);
3.And finally get the value in the function:
handleSort(theValue){
console.log(theValue);
}
Using arrow function :
You must install stage-2:
npm install babel-preset-stage-2 :
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
value=0
}
}
changeValue = (data) => (e) => {
alert(data); //10
this.setState({ [value]: data })
}
render() {
const data = 10;
return (
<div>
<input type="button" onClick={this.changeValue(data)} />
</div>
);
}
}
export default App;
Theres' a very easy way.
onClick={this.toggleStart('xyz')} .
toggleStart= (data) => (e) =>{
console.log('value is'+data);
}
class TableHeader extends Component {
handleClick = (parameter,event) => {
console.log(parameter)
console.log(event)
}
render() {
return (
<button type="button"
onClick={this.handleClick.bind(this,"dataOne")}>Send</button>
);
}
}
Coming out of nowhere to this question, but i think .bind will do the trick. Find the sample code below.
const handleClick = (data) => {
console.log(data)
}
<button onClick={handleClick.bind(null, { title: 'mytitle', id: '12345' })}>Login</button>
There are 3 ways to handle this :-
Bind the method in constructor as :-
export class HeaderRows extends Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.handleSort = this.handleSort.bind(this);
}
}
Use the arrow function while creating it as :-
handleSort = () => {
// some text here
}
Third way is this :-
<th value={column} onClick={() => that.handleSort} >{column}</th>
You can use your code like this:
<th value={column} onClick={(e) => that.handleSort(e, column)} >{column}</th>
Here e is for event object, if you want to use event methods like preventDefault() in your handle function or want to get target value or name like e.target.name.
There were a lot of performance considerations, all in the vacuum.
The issue with this handlers is that you need to curry them in order to incorporate the argument that you can't name in the props.
This means that the component needs a handler for each and every clickable element. Let's agree that for a few buttons this is not an issue, right?
The problem arises when you are handling tabular data with dozens of columns and thousands of rows. There you notice the impact of creating that many handlers.
The fact is, I only need one.
I set the handler at the table level (or UL or OL...), and when the click happens I can tell which was the clicked cell using data available since ever in the event object:
nativeEvent.target.tagName
nativeEvent.target.parentElement.tagName
nativeEvent.target.parentElement.rowIndex
nativeEvent.target.cellIndex
nativeEvent.target.textContent
I use the tagname fields to check that the click happened in a valid element, for example ignore clicks in THs ot footers.
The rowIndex and cellIndex give the exact location of the clicked cell.
Textcontent is the text of the clicked cell.
This way I don't need to pass the cell's data to the handler, it can self-service it.
If I needed more data, data that is not to be displayed, I can use the dataset attribute, or hidden elements.
With some simple DOM navigation it's all at hand.
This has been used in HTML since ever, since PCs were much easier to bog.
When working with a function as opposed to a class, it's actually fairly easy.
const [breakfastMain, setBreakFastMain] = useState("Breakfast");
const changeBreakfastMain = (e) => {
setBreakFastMain(e.target.value);
//sometimes "value" won't do it, like for text, etc. In that case you need to
//write 'e.target/innerHTML'
}
<ul onClick={changeBreakfastMain}>
<li>
"some text here"
</li>
<li>
"some text here"
</li>
</ul>
I'd do it like this:
const HeaderRows = props => {
const handleSort = value => () => {
}
return <tr>
{props.defaultColumns.map((column, i) =>
<th key={i} onClick={handleSort(column)}>{column}</th>)}
{props.externalColumns.map((column, i) => {
// Multi dimension array - 0 is column name
const externalColumnName = column[0]
return (<th key={i}>{externalColumnName}</th>)
})}
</tr>
}

Categories