I have had react-beautiful-dnd installed and functional for a while and out of nowhere I am now getting an error from node_modules about create-react-app being unable to compile the file position.js in the react-beautiful-dnd package. I have looked into breaking changes being pushed to their repo but nothing is different 2 months back, I invalidated my cache and restarted (on webstorm) nothing, finally I deleted my node_modules and reinstalled them but still the error occurs.
It seems to be rightly trying to compile the file as javascript given its extension however the code seems to be Typescript, I looked at the repository and indeed github reports it to be 100% javascript but most of the files I saw including the snipped above seem to use Typescript. I was under the impression that typescript could not be directly run from a javascript file am I incorrect? What could be causing the error?
Thank you
To use import type, you should place type before the curly brackets:
import type { Position } from 'css-box-model';
Besides, if you want to import the type definition in 'css-box-model' as well as its methods or constants, import them separately:
import { constant } from 'css-box-model';
import type { interface } from 'css-box-model';
Related
I'm upgrading a React application and have found that I need to modify the import statements to get them to work.
For example, in the old version, the following import works without errors:
import { User } from '../System'
Note that System is a directory on my file system that contains User, a js file that ends with export default User.
In my upgraded version of the app, the System directory still exists, but the above import gives me Can't resolve '../System' in 'C:\my app\.
It turns out that to get the import working properly now, I need to change it to the following:
import User from '../System/User';
If I understand correctly, this relates to js module system changes made with ES6.
My question, though, is regarding the specification of a directory in the import statement (System above). Why would it be that I was previously able to name a file directory in the import statement instead of the actual js script/module itself? Is that approach of using a directory in the import statement still possible? And if so, is it ever advisable?
Update: based on AKX's comment, I noticed the System directory does indeed contain an index.js, which apparently is what makes the import from the directory itself possible.
When an import points to a directory, and only a file, Webpack (which most React setups use) follows Node's's conventions and will attempt to import index.js from that directory if it exists. That's the only condition under which importing from a path that points to a directory works - your previous build probably had /System/index.js (which would allow importing with from '../System'). If you rename the file you're importing to anything else - such as to User.js - importing using only the directory path will fail.
And if so, is it ever advisable?
Sure, if you want. It's a style choice but is commonly done.
GOAL
I am trying to setup Typescript, Vue, and Vuetify in Codesandbox, but it seems like nothing will cooperate.
I copied code straight from a normal Vue app initialized with Vue CLI and it doesn't work :/
PROBLEM
Typescript will not recognize .vue files (such as import App from "#/App.vue"; in main.ts)
In App.vue, eslint keeps flagging # from the #Component decorator EVEN though I set a parser in .eslintrc.js
ATTEMPTED SOLUTIONS
I tried to solve the problem with Typescript not recognizing .vue files using Importing Vue components in TypeScript file
BUT it doesn't work anymore. Also, this implementation makes every import hyperlink go to vue-shim.d.ts. When I CNTRL click the import to go to the imported file's contents, I go to vue-shim.d.ts instead of to the imported file.
I tried solving the #Component decorator problem with eslint using ESLint unexpected character '#' for JS decorators
BUT it did nothing.
CODE
https://codesandbox.io/s/infallible-framework-pjbx1?file=/src/App.vue
Although I am able to start the npm project using npm start without any issues with webpack or babel, once I run npm test, I find the following error related to testing App.js using App.test.js (where App.js imports ApolloClient):
TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property '__esModule' of object '[object Object]'
| import ApolloClient from 'apollo-boost';
| ^
at node_modules/apollo-boost/lib/bundle.cjs.js:127:74
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
at Object.<anonymous> (node_modules/apollo-boost/lib/bundle.cjs.js:127:36)
Essentially, I'm confused as to why I get an error when running the test but not when starting the project.
I've tried adding in a number of babel plugins to both .babelrc and in my webpack config file:
#babel/plugin-transform-object-assign
#babel/plugin-transform-modules-commonjs
babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs
However, I haven't been able to resolve the issue. My thinking was that this is related to the fact that the file that fails to compile was originally CommonJS.
I was only able to find something relatively similar here, https://github.com/ReactTraining/react-router/pull/6758, but I didn't find a solution.
Is there something that I'm missing specifically related to running tests? I should also mention I've tried frameworks other than Jest and ran into the same issue.
EDIT:
I removed everything from App.test.js except the imports to isolate the issue so it just contains the following:
import React from 'react';
import { shallow } from 'enzyme/build';
import App from './App';
UPDATE:
I was able to resolve the initial error by upgrading apollo-boost from version 0.3.1 to 0.4.2. However, I now have a different error that is similarly frustrating. I am using Babel 7 and have added the plugin #babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import to both my .babelrc and to my webpack.config.js files. Despite this, I get the following error related to the use of a dynamic import in App.js when running the Jest to test App.test.js:
SyntaxError: Support for the experimental syntax 'dynamicImport' isn't currently enabled
Add #babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import (https://git.io/vb4Sv) to the 'plugins' section of your Babel config to enable parsing.
I'm not sure if there is a parsing error or something else, but I've tried numerous things that have not worked. The closest discussion I could find related to this problem is, https://github.com/facebook/jest/issues/5920, however, the proposed solutions don't work for me.
UPDATE:
One thing that I'm trying is to avoid duplication of the babel options as right now they're both in .babelrc and in the babel-loader options within webpack.config.js. From what I found online (Whats the difference when configuring webpack babel-loader vs configuring it within package.json?), the way to make webpack use the settings in .babelrc is to not specify options. However, doing so results in the same error described above showing up only this time when running npm start. I will add that the project that was originally created using create-react-app, however, in order to support multiple pages, I needed to customize webpack's configuration and so ejected from it. I'm not sure why this is so convoluted.
its probably a babel configuration issue, I'm pretty sure jest needs to be compiled to work with create-react-app...
did you specify a setup file in package.json:
"jest": {
"setupFiles": [
"/setupTests.js"
]
}
and in setupTests.js:
import { configure } from 'enzyme';
import Adapter from 'enzyme-adapter-react-16';
configure({ adapter: new Adapter() });
It turns out that one of the components in the project's src directory had its own local package.json file even though it wasn't being used and was not installed as a local dependency in the top level package.json (instead imports were done using relative urls). For some reason, the existence of this file changed the behavior of webpack and other tools when starting and testing the project such that none of the top level configurations were used for files within directories with separate package.json files. Once I removed these local package.json files from the components sub-directory, all the prior issues were resolved. One hallmark of this problem is that compilation errors were not showing up for JavaScript files that weren't nested under an alternate package.json file.
Hopefully this is useful for anyone that encounters similar errors as I don't think the cause can be directly determined from the compiler messages alone.
Background
I am using a library called baguettebox.js
You can see it here
Problem
When I import this into my project like
import * as BaguetteBox from 'baguettebox.js';
I get a warning flagged inside my IDE PhpStorm
Cannot resolve file 'baguettebox.js'
This is because the folder & package.json are called baguettebox.js.
The Package is actually found and works in my application, I just want a good way to handle this error.
It's the IDE issue. Please follow WEB-25805 for updates
I happen to need a file storage database and UploadFS seems to be the best option. My project is in Angular2 typescript and Meteor.
meteor add jalik:ufs-gridfs
So far it fails when I try to import the library like this:
import {UploadFS} from 'meteor/jalik:ufs'
The error thrown sais it couldn't find the library (on the client side).
I thought it may be because the library is in javascript while the rest of the project in typescript so I tried to write a stub ufs.d.ts, first handcrafted, then with dstmake, and then by hand again when I found I had to export the module UploadFS so that meteor (barbatus:typescript?) could see it:
declare module 'meteor/jalik:ufs' {
export module UploadFS{
interface UploadFS {
...
}
}
}
So far I had my ufs.d.ts stub file at the typings/ folder and linked in the main.d.ts. No errors at compile time. Meteor sad the DB was correctly created ... but then when I tried to use it broke.
I found that UploadFS was undefined so I supposed it wasn't referencing the library even though Meteor compiled without any error.
So I suppose the only thing I've have left is to translate jalik:ufs and jalik:ufs-gridfs to typescript by hand. Is that correct? Is there an easier way of making ufs work wit angular2-meteor?
Would you use some other storage solution? any advice either fixing this library or choosing another one?
I'm successfully importing that library and just suppressing the warnings with this line:
import 'meteor/jalik:ufs'; declare let UploadFS:any;
Keep an eye on https://github.com/meteor-typings and https://github.com/Urigo/angular2-meteor/issues/102 for proper type definitions in the future.
You should never have to re-implement a JavaScript library in TypeScript in order to use it.
import { UploadFS } from 'meteor/jalik:ufs';
console.log('UploadFS', UploadFS);
This gives me the UploadFS object and I think it's totally independent of angular2-meteor so I suppose that jalik:ufs should be working fine, even with those warnings generated by ts compiler.
About typings, those warning are very annoying, I know :) but you can pretend for now you don't see them.
Here's an example implementation of jalik:ufs I made for Angular1, but it will look pretty much the same with Angular2.
http://www.angular-meteor.com/tutorials/socially/angular1/handling-files-with-collectionfs