So I'm trying to build a component in Vue 3 that acts as a form, and in order for the data to be processed by the parent I want it to emit an object with all the inputs on change. The issue I'm having is that I don't seem to be able to call $emit from within watch() (probably because of the context, but I also don't see why the component-wide context isn't passed by default, and it doesn't accept this). I also cannot call any method because of the same reason.
I do see some people using the watch: {} syntax but as I understand it that is deprecated and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me either.
Here's a minimal example of what I'm trying to accomplish. Whenever the input date is changed, I want the component to emit a custom event.
<template>
<input
v-model="date"
name="dateInput"
type="date"
>
</template>
<script>
import { watch, ref } from "vue";
export default {
name: 'Demo',
props: {
},
emits: ["date-updated"],
setup() {
const date = ref("")
watch([date], (newVal) => {
// $emit is undefined
console.log(newVal);
$emit("date-updated", {newVal})
// watchHandler is undefined
watchHandler(newVal)
})
return {
date
}
},
data() {
return {
}
},
mounted() {
},
methods: {
watchHandler(newVal) {
console.log(newVal);
$emit("date-updated", {newVal})
}
},
}
</script>
Don't mix between option and composition api in order to keep the component consistent, the emit function is available in the context parameter of the setup hook::
<template>
<input
v-model="date"
name="dateInput"
type="date"
>
</template>
<script>
import { watch, ref } from "vue";
export default {
name: 'Demo',
props: {},
emits: ["date-updated"],
setup(props,context) {// or setup(props,{emit}) then use emit directly
const date = ref("")
watch(date, (newVal) => {
context.emit("date-updated", {newVal})
})
return {
date
}
},
}
</script>
if you want to add the method watchHandler you could define it a plain js function like :
...
watch(date, (newVal) => {
context.emit("date-updated", {newVal})
})
function watchHandler(newVal) {
console.log(newVal);
context.emit("date-updated", {newVal})
}
...
Related
I'm sending from the parent component a prop: user. Now in the child component I want to make a copy of it without it changing the prop's value.
I tried doing it like this:
export default defineComponent({
props: {
apiUser: {
required: true,
type: Object
}
},
setup(props) {
const user = ref(props.apiUser);
return { user };
}
});
But then if I change a value of the user object it also changes the apiUser prop. I thought maybe using Object.assign would work but then the ref isn't reactive anymore.
In Vue 2.0 I would do it like this:
export default {
props: {
apiUser: {
required: true,
type: Object
}
},
data() {
return {
user: {}
}
},
mounted() {
this.user = this.apiUser;
// Now I can use this.user without changing this.apiUser's value.
}
};
Credits to #butttons for the comment that lead to the answer.
const user = reactive({ ...props.apiUser });
props: {
apiUser: {
required: true,
type: Object
}
},
setup(props) {
const userCopy = toRef(props, 'apiUser')
}
With the composition API we have the toRef API that allows you to create a copy from any source reactive object. Since the props object is a reactive, you use toRef() and it won't mutate your prop.
This is what you looking for: https://vuejs.org/guide/components/props.html#one-way-data-flow
Create data where you add the prop to
export default {
props: ['apiUser'],
data() {
return {
// user only uses this.apiUser as the initial value;
// it is disconnected from future prop updates.
user: this.apiUser
}
}
}
Or if you use api composition:
import {ref} from "vue";
const props = defineProps(['apiUser']);
const user = ref(props.apiUser);
You also may want to consider using computed methods (see also linked doc section from above) or v-model.
Please note that the marked solution https://stackoverflow.com/a/67820271/2311074 is not working. If you try to update user you will see a readonly error on the console. If you don't need to modify user, you may just use the prop in the first place.
As discussed in comment section, a Vue 2 method that I'm personally fond of in these cases is the following, it will basically make a roundtrip when updating a model.
Parent (apiUser) ->
Child (clone apiUser to user, make changes, emit) ->
Parent (Set changes reactively) ->
Child (Automatically receives changes, and creates new clone)
Parent
<template>
<div class="parent-root"
<child :apiUser="apiUser" #setUserData="setUserData" />
</div>
</template>
// ----------------------------------------------------
// (Obviously imports of child component etc.)
export default {
data() {
apiUser: {
id: 'e134',
age: 27
}
},
methods: {
setUserData(payload) {
this.$set(this.apiUser, 'age', payload);
}
}
}
Child
<template>
<div class="child-root"
{{ apiUser }}
</div>
</template>
// ----------------------------------------------------
// (Obviously imports of components etc.)
export default {
props: {
apiUser: {
required: true,
type: Object
}
},
data() {
user: null
},
watch: {
apiUser: {
deep: true,
handler() {
// Whatever clone method you want to use
this.user = cloneDeep(this.apiUser);
}
}
},
mounted() {
// Whatever clone method you want to use
this.user = cloneDeep(this.apiUser);
},
methods: {
// Whatever function catching the changes you want to do
setUserData(payload) {
this.$emit('setUserData', this.user);
}
}
}
Apologies for any miss types
I have general component and vuex store. For easy two-way binding I use vuex-map-fields. On component side it has mapFields method which creates get&set with mutations.
I want to pass namespace from vuex module with props but it seems to be impossible.
<my-component namespace="ns1" />
// my-component code
export default {
props: ["namespace"],
computed: {
...mapFields(??this.namespace??, ["attr1", "attr2"])
}
}
Of course, there is no way to use this in such way so we don't have access to props. How can I specify namespace as prop in such case?
The problem (as you probably gathered) is that computed properties are constructed before this is available, but you can get around it by deferring resolution of the this.namespace property until the computed property is called (which won't happen until component construction is finished).
The concept is based on this post Generating computed properties on the fly.
The basic pattern is to use a computed with get() and set()
computed: {
foo: {
get() { this.namespace...},
set() { this.namespace...},
}
}
but rather than type it all out in the component we can create a helper function based on the vuex-map-fields mapFields() function (see here for the original).
The normalizeNamespace() function that comes with vuex-map-fields does not support what we want to do, so we drop it and assume the namespace is always passed in (and that the store module uses the standard getField and updateField functions).
I have adapted one of the vuex-map-fields Codesandbox examples here.
Note the namespace is in data rather than props for conveniance, but props should work also.
Template
<template>
<div id="app">
<div>
<label>foo </label> <input v-model="foo" /> <span> {{ foo }}</span>
</div>
<br />
<div>
<label>bar </label> <input v-model="bar" /> <span> {{ bar }}</span>
</div>
</div>
</template>
Helper
<script>
const mapFields2 = (namespaceProp, fields) => {
return Object.keys(fields).reduce((prev, key) => {
const path = fields[key];
const field = {
get() {
const namespace = this[namespaceProp];
const getterPath = `${namespace}/getField`;
return this.$store.getters[getterPath](path);
},
set(value) {
const namespace = this[namespaceProp];
const mutationPath = `${namespace}/updateField`;
this.$store.commit(mutationPath, { path, value });
}
};
prev[key] = field;
return prev;
}, {});
};
export default {
name: "App",
data() {
return {
nsProp: "fooModule"
};
},
computed: {
...mapFields2("nsProp", { foo: "foo", bar: "bar" })
}
};
</script>
Store
import Vue from "vue";
import Vuex from "vuex";
import { getField, updateField } from "vuex-map-fields";
import App from "./App";
Vue.use(Vuex);
Vue.config.productionTip = false;
const store = new Vuex.Store({
modules: {
fooModule: {
namespaced: true,
state: {
foo: "initial foo value",
bar: "initail bar value"
},
getters: {
getField
},
mutations: {
updateField
}
}
}
});
new Vue({
el: "#app",
components: { App },
store,
template: "<App/>"
});
I am trying to send this.TC from typing.js to ending-page.js which are sibling components. Emits and event hubs not working. But emit from typing.js to parent works as I want. (There will be only one more call in this app, so i don't want use Vuex if it isnt necessary for this - i want to do it with simple emits ) Here's my code:
Parent:
<template>
<div id = "app">
<typing v-if = "DynamicComponent === 'typing'" />
<ending_page v-else-if = "DynamicComponent === 'ending_page'" />
</div>
</template>
<script>
/* Importing siblings components to parent component */
import typing from './components/typing/index.vue'
import ending_page from './components/ending-page/index.vue'
export default {
name: 'app',
components: {
typing,
ending_page
},
data() {
return {
DynamicComponent: "typing",
};
},
methods: {
updateDynamicComponent: function(evt, data){
this.DynamicComponent = evt;
},
},
};
</script>
typing.js:
import { eventBus } from "../../main";
export default {
name: 'app',
components: {
},
data() {
return {
/* Text what is in input. If you write this.input = "sometext" input text will change (It just works from JS to HTML and from HTML to JS) */
input: "",
/* Object of TypingCore.js */
TC: "somedata",
/* Timer obejct */
timer: null,
is_started: false,
style_preferences: null,
};
},
ICallThisFunctionWhenIWantToEmitSomething: function(evt) {
/* Sending data to ending_page component */
this.$root.$emit('eventname', 'somedata');
/* Calling parent to ChangeDynamicComponent && sending TC.data what will be given to ending_page (I think it looks better with one syntax here) */
this.$emit('myEvent', 'ending_page', this.TC.data);
}
},
};
ending-page.js:
import { eventBus } from "../../main";
export default {
name: 'ending-page',
components: {},
data () {
return {
data: "nothing",
}
},
computed: {
},
props: {
},
methods: {
},
/* I know arrow functions etc but i was trying everyting */
created: function () {
this.$root.$on('eventname', function (data) {
console.log(data)
this.title = data
this.$nextTick()
})
}
}
It is an example of how to share data between siblings components.
Children components emits events to parent. Parent components send data to children.
So, the parent has the property title shared between the children. When typing emits
the input event the directive v-modelcapture it an set the value on parent.
Ref:
https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/components-props.html#One-Way-Data-Flow
https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/components.html#Using-v-model-on-Components
https://benjaminlistwon.com/blog/data-flow-in-vue-and-vuex/
Vue.component('typing', {
props: {
value: ''
},
template: '<button #click="emit">Click to change</button>',
methods: {
emit() {
this.$emit('input', `changed on ${Date.now()}`);
}
}
});
Vue.component('ending-page', {
props: {
title: ''
},
template: '<div>{{ title }}</div>',
});
var app = new Vue({
el: '#app',
data() {
return {
title: 'unchanged',
};
},
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/vue/2.5.17/vue.js"></script>
<div id="app">
<typing v-model="title"></typing>
<ending-page :title="title"></ending-page>
</div>
One can try communication using vuex,
the data you want to share make it on this.$store.state or if recalling for functions use mutation(sync functions) and actions(async functions)
https://vuex.vuejs.org/
I like what Jeffrey Way suggested once, just create a global events object (which accidentally can be another Vue instance) and then use that as an event bus for any global communication.
window.eventBus = new Vue();
// in components that emit:
eventBus.$emit('event', data);
// in components that listen
eventBus.$on('event');
I try to explain it as simple as possible. I have something like this. Simple Vue root, Vuex store and input with v-model inside navbar id.
That input is not reactive... Why?!
HTML
<div id="navbar">
<h2>#{{ test }}</h2>
<input v-model="test" />
</div>
store.js
import Vuex from 'vuex'
export const store = new Vuex.Store({
state: {
test: 'test'
},
getters: {
test (state) {
return state.test
}
}
})
Vue Root
import { store } from './app-store.js'
new Vue({
el: '#navbar',
store,
computed: {
test () {
return this.$store.getters.test
}
}
})
You're binding to a computed property. In order to set a value on a computed property you need to write get and set methods.
computed:{
test:{
get(){ return this.$store.getters.test; },
set( value ){ this.$store.commit("TEST_COMMIT", value );}
}
}
And in your store
mutations:{
TEST_COMMIT( state, payload ){
state.test=payload;
}
}
Now when you change the value of the input bound to test, it will trigger a commit to the store, which updates its state.
You don't want to use v-model for that. Instead, use #input="test" in your input field and in the your methods hook:
test(e){
this.$store.dispatch('setTest', e.target.value)
}
Inside your Vuex store:
In mutations:
setTest(state, payload){
state.test = payload
},
In actions:
setTest: (context,val) => {context.commit('setTest', val)},
The input should now be reactive and you should see the result in #{{test}}
Here is an example of how I handle user input with Vuex: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/gmROQq
You can easily use v-model with Vuex (with actions/mutations firing on each change) by using my library:
https://github.com/yarsky-tgz/vuex-dot
<template>
<form>
<input v-model="name"/>
<input v-model="email"/>
</form>
</template>
<script>
import { takeState } from 'vuex-dot';
export default {
computed: {
...takeState('user')
.expose(['name', 'email'])
.commit('editUser') // payload example: { name: 'Peter'}
.map()
}
}
</script>
The computed property is one-way. If you want two-way binding, make a setter as the other answers suggest or use the data property instead.
import { store } from './app-store.js'
new Vue({
el: '#navbar',
store,
// computed: {
// test() {
// return this.$store.getters.test;
// }
// }
data: function() {
return { test: this.$store.getters.test };
}
});
But a setter is better to validate input value.
I'm using Vue v1.0.28 and vue-resource to call my API and get the resource data. So I have a parent component, called Role, which has a child InputOptions. It has a foreach that iterates over the roles.
The big picture of all this is a list of items that can be selected, so the API can return items that are selected beforehand because the user saved/selected them time ago. The point is I can't fill selectedOptions of InputOptions. How could I get that information from parent component? Is that the way to do it, right?
I pasted here a chunk of my code, to try to show better picture of my problem:
role.vue
<template>
<div class="option-blocks">
<input-options
:options="roles"
:selected-options="selected"
:label-key-name.once="'name'"
:on-update="onUpdate"
v-ref:input-options
></input-options>
</div>
</template>
<script type="text/babel">
import InputOptions from 'components/input-options/default'
import Titles from 'steps/titles'
export default {
title: Titles.role,
components: { InputOptions },
methods: {
onUpdate(newSelectedOptions, oldSelectedOptions) {
this.selected = newSelectedOptions
}
},
data() {
return {
roles: [],
selected: [],
}
},
ready() {
this.$http.get('/ajax/roles').then((response) => {
this.roles = response.body
this.selected = this.roles.filter(role => role.checked)
})
}
}
</script>
InputOptions
<template>
<ul class="option-blocks centered">
<li class="option-block" :class="{ active: isSelected(option) }" v-for="option in options" #click="toggleSelect(option)">
<label>{{ option[labelKeyName] }}</label>
</li>
</ul>
</template>
<script type="text/babel">
import Props from 'components/input-options/mixins/props'
export default {
mixins: [ Props ],
computed: {
isSingleSelection() {
return 1 === this.max
}
},
methods: {
toggleSelect(option) {
//...
},
isSelected(option) {
return this.selectedOptions.includes(option)
}
},
data() {
return {}
},
ready() {
// I can't figure out how to do it
// I guess it's here where I need to get that information,
// resolved in a promise of the parent component
this.$watch('selectedOptions', this.onUpdate)
}
}
</script>
Props
export default {
props: {
options: {
required: true
},
labelKeyName: {
required: true
},
max: {},
min: {},
onUpdate: {
required: true
},
noneOptionLabel: {},
selectedOptions: {
type: Array
default: () => []
}
}
}
EDIT
I'm now getting this warning in the console:
[Vue warn]: Data field "selectedOptions" is already defined as a prop. To provide default value for a prop, use the "default" prop option; if you want to pass prop values to an instantiation call, use the "propsData" option. (found in component: <default-input-options>)
Are you using Vue.js version 2.0.3? If so, there is no ready function as specified in http://vuejs.org/api. You can do it in created hook of the component as follows:
// InputOptions component
// ...
data: function() {
return {
selectedOptions: []
}
},
created: function() {
this.$watch('selectedOptions', this.onUpdate)
}
In your InputOptions component, you have the following code:
this.$watch('selectedOptions', this.onUpdate)
But I am unable to see a onUpdate function defined in methods. Instead, it is defined in the parent component role. Can you insert a console.log("selectedOptions updated") to check if it is getting called as per your expectation? I think Vue.js expects methods to be present in the same component.
Alternatively in the above case, I think you are allowed to do this.$parent.onUpdate inside this.$watch(...) - something I have not tried but might work for you.
EDIT: some more thoughts
You may have few more issues - you are trying to observe an array - selectedOptions which is a risky strategy. Arrays don't change - they are like containers for list of objects. But the individual objects inside will change. Therefore your $watch might not trigger for selectedOptions.
Based on my experience with Vue.js till now, I have observed that array changes are registered when you add or delete an item, but not when you change a single object - something you need to verify on your own.
To work around this behaviour, you may have separate component (input-one-option) for each of your input options, in which it is easier to observe changes.
Finally, I found the bug. I wasn't binding the prop as kebab-case