How to mock useEffect async calls with react-native-testing-library? - javascript

I'm trying to test the screen that has useEffect hook with the following:
export const SomeScreen: React.FC<Props> = ({}) => {
const [isSensorAvailable, setIsSensorAvailable] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
const isSensorAvailableCheck = async () => {
try {
await FingerprintScanner.isSensorAvailable();
setIsSensorAvailable(true);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
}
};
isSensorAvailableCheck();
}, []);
...
Here goes code that renders View if the sensor is available
...
}
And I'm trying the following test:
import {default as FingerprintScannerMock} from 'react-native-fingerprint-scanner';
jest.mock('react-native-fingerprint-scanner');
(FingerprintScannerMock.isSensorAvailable as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(true);
const createTestProps = (props: Object) => ({
navigation: {
navigate: jest.fn(),
},
...props,
});
describe('Testing some screen', () => {
test('testing some functionalities', async () => {
let props: any;
props = createTestProps({});
const component = render(
<Provider store={store}>
<RegisterPasswordScreen {...props} />
</Provider>,
);
const {getByText, getByTestId, getAllByTestId} = component;
const container = getByTestId('containerId');
expect(container).toBeTruthy();
});
});
But this container is never found because setIsSensorIsAvailable never sets the value to true because of the following error:
An update to SomeScreen inside a test was not wrapped in act(...).
I tried everything even like this:
const component = await waitFor(() =>
render(<Provider store={store}>
<RegisterPasswordScreen {...props} />
</Provider>,
);
);
But when I run this test it never ends. Tried also to wrap it with act(...) but that does not work either, then the error is following:
Can't access .root on unmounted test renderer.
Any help appreciated, thanks!

Had a similar issue
Wrapping the component using act(https://reactjs.org/docs/testing-recipes.html#act) solved my issue
Using create to wrap your component for react native instead of using a typical render method wrapped in act
import { act, create } from 'react-test-renderer';
it('test', () => {
await act(async () => {
create(<ComponentWithAsyncUseEffect />);
});
})

I ended up using findByTestId rather than getByTestId and now it works well.

Related

Jest test fails on a react component which uses react-hooks-form with sharing refs

Here is the abstract version of my component
const Test = () => {
const { register } = useFormContext();
const mRef = useThirdpartyHook(); // Third party hook returns a ref
const { ref, ...rest } = register('test');
return (
<input
type="text"
name="test"
{...rest}
ref={(e) => {
ref(e);
mRef.current = e;
}}
/>
);
};
export default Test;
Test case
import React from 'react';
import { render } from '#testing-library/react';
import { FormProvider } from 'react-hook-form';
import Test from './Test';
describe('<Test> component', () => {
it('renders default correctly', () => {
const wrapper = render(
<FormProvider
{...{ register: () => jest.fn() }}>
<Test />
</FormProvider>
);
expect(wrapper.baseElement).toMatchSnapshot();
});
});
Executing this test throws an error as given below.
<Test> component › renders default correctly
TypeError: ref is not a function
ref={(e) => {
ref(e);
^
mRef.current = e;
}}
I tried to mock the ref as function but it didn't help. It would be great if anyone can throw some insights.
register is a function that returns props the input needs. You are mocking the register function, but it still needs to return everything the component is consuming or passing on. Specifically it seems you need to return a ref function for what is returned by the useFormContext hook.
Example:
describe('<Test> component', () => {
it('renders default correctly', () => {
const registerMock = () => ({
ref: jest.fn(),
.... mock other necessary bits here
});
const wrapper = render(
<FormProvider
{...{ register: registerMock }}
>
<Test />
</FormProvider>
);
expect(wrapper.baseElement).toMatchSnapshot();
});
});

How to cleanup a async call in react component useEffect after unmount? [duplicate]

Problem
I am writing an application in React and was unable to avoid a super common pitfall, which is calling setState(...) after componentWillUnmount(...).
I looked very carefully at my code and tried to put some guarding clauses in place, but the problem persisted and I am still observing the warning.
Therefore, I've got two questions:
How do I figure out from the stack trace, which particular component and event handler or lifecycle hook is responsible for the rule violation?
Well, how to fix the problem itself, because my code was written with this pitfall in mind and is already trying to prevent it, but some underlying component's still generating the warning.
Browser console
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application.
To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in the componentWillUnmount
method.
in TextLayerInternal (created by Context.Consumer)
in TextLayer (created by PageInternal) index.js:1446
d/console[e]
index.js:1446
warningWithoutStack
react-dom.development.js:520
warnAboutUpdateOnUnmounted
react-dom.development.js:18238
scheduleWork
react-dom.development.js:19684
enqueueSetState
react-dom.development.js:12936
./node_modules/react/cjs/react.development.js/Component.prototype.setState
react.development.js:356
_callee$
TextLayer.js:97
tryCatch
runtime.js:63
invoke
runtime.js:282
defineIteratorMethods/</prototype[method]
runtime.js:116
asyncGeneratorStep
asyncToGenerator.js:3
_throw
asyncToGenerator.js:29
Code
Book.tsx
import { throttle } from 'lodash';
import * as React from 'react';
import { AutoWidthPdf } from '../shared/AutoWidthPdf';
import BookCommandPanel from '../shared/BookCommandPanel';
import BookTextPath from '../static/pdf/sde.pdf';
import './Book.css';
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: () => void;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
isComponentMounted: boolean = false;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
constructor(props: any) {
super(props);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
);
}
componentDidMount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = true;
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = false;
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
AutoWidthPdf.tsx
import * as React from 'react';
import { Document, Page, pdfjs } from 'react-pdf';
pdfjs.GlobalWorkerOptions.workerSrc = `//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pdf.js/${pdfjs.version}/pdf.worker.js`;
interface IProps {
file: string;
width: number;
onLoadSuccess: (pdf: any) => void;
}
export class AutoWidthPdf extends React.Component<IProps> {
render = () => (
<Document
file={this.props.file}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.props.onLoadSuccess(_)}
>
<Page
pageNumber={1}
width={this.props.width}
/>
</Document>
);
}
Update 1: Cancel throttleable function (still no luck)
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: ((() => void) & Cancelable) | undefined;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
componentDidMount = () => {
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
},
500,
);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable!);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!.cancel();
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = undefined;
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
Here is a React Hooks specific solution for
Error
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
Solution
You can declare let isMounted = true inside useEffect, which will be changed in the cleanup callback, as soon as the component is unmounted. Before state updates, you now check this variable conditionally:
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true; // note mutable flag
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
return () => { isMounted = false }; // cleanup toggles value, if unmounted
}, []); // adjust dependencies to your needs
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
fetchData();
return () => {
isMounted = false;
};
// simulate some Web API fetching
function fetchData() {
setTimeout(() => {
// drop "if (isMounted)" to trigger error again
// (take IDE, doesn't work with stack snippet)
if (isMounted) setState("data fetched")
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
}, 4000);
}
}, []);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
Extension: Custom useAsync Hook
We can encapsulate all the boilerplate into a custom Hook, that automatically aborts async functions in case the component unmounts or dependency values have changed before:
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data);
});
return () => { isActive = false };
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
// custom Hook for automatic abortion on unmount or dependency change
// You might add onFailure for promise errors as well.
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data)
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
});
return () => {
isActive = false;
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useAsync(simulateFetchData, setState);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const simulateFetchData = () => new Promise(
resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve("data fetched"), 4000));
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
More on effect cleanups: Overreacted: A Complete Guide to useEffect
To remove - Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component warning, use componentDidMount method under a condition and make false that condition on componentWillUnmount method. For example : -
class Home extends Component {
_isMounted = false;
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
news: [],
};
}
componentDidMount() {
this._isMounted = true;
ajaxVar
.get('https://domain')
.then(result => {
if (this._isMounted) {
this.setState({
news: result.data.hits,
});
}
});
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this._isMounted = false;
}
render() {
...
}
}
If above solutions dont work, try this and it works for me:
componentWillUnmount() {
// fix Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component
this.setState = (state,callback)=>{
return;
};
}
There is a hook that's fairly common called useIsMounted that solves this problem (for functional components)...
import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
export function useIsMounted() {
const isMounted = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isMounted.current = true;
return () => isMounted.current = false;
}, []);
return isMounted;
}
then in your functional component
function Book() {
const isMounted = useIsMounted();
...
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted.current) { setState(data); }
})
});
...
}
Checking if a component is mounted is actually an anti pattern as per React documentation. The solution to the setState warning is rather to leverage on the use of an AbortController:
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort() // stop the query by aborting on the AbortController on unmount
}
}, [])
For asynchronous operations that aren't based on the Fetch API, there still should be a way to cancel these asynchronous operations, and you should rather leverage these than just checking if a component is mounted. If you are building your own API, you can implement the AbortController API in it to handle it.
For more context, the check if a component is mounted is an anti pattern as React is checking internally if the component is mounted to display that warning. Doing the same check again is just a way to hide the warning, and there are some easier ways to hide them than adding this piece of code on a big part of a codebase.
Source: https://medium.com/doctolib/react-stop-checking-if-your-component-is-mounted-3bb2568a4934
I had this warning possibly because of calling setState from an effect hook (This is discussed in these 3 issues linked together).
Anyway, upgrading the react version removed the warning.
React already removed this warning
but here is a better solution (not just workaround)
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort()
}
}, [])
The solution from #ford04 didn't worked to me and specially if you need to use the isMounted in multiple places (multiple useEffect for instance), it's recommended to useRef, as bellow:
Essential packages
"dependencies":
{
"react": "17.0.1",
}
"devDependencies": {
"typescript": "4.1.5",
}
My Hook Component
export const SubscriptionsView: React.FC = () => {
const [data, setData] = useState<Subscription[]>();
const isMounted = React.useRef(true);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (isMounted.current) {
// fetch data
// setData (fetch result)
return () => {
isMounted.current = false;
};
}
}
});
try changing setDivSizeThrottleable to
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
{ leading: false, trailing: true }
);
I know that you're not using history, but in my case I was using the useHistory hook from React Router DOM, which unmounts the component before the state is persisted in my React Context Provider.
To fix this problem I have used the hook withRouter nesting the component, in my case export default withRouter(Login), and inside the component const Login = props => { ...; props.history.push("/dashboard"); .... I have also removed the other props.history.push from the component, e.g, if(authorization.token) return props.history.push('/dashboard') because this causes a loop, because the authorization state.
An alternative to push a new item to history.
Add a ref to a jsx component and then check it exist
function Book() {
const ref = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (ref.current) setState(data);
})
});
return <div ref={ref}>content</div>
}
I had a similar issue thanks #ford04 helped me out.
However, another error occurred.
NB. I am using ReactJS hooks
ndex.js:1 Warning: Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within `render`). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state.
What causes the error?
import {useHistory} from 'react-router-dom'
const History = useHistory()
if (true) {
history.push('/new-route');
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
This could not work because despite you are redirecting to new page all state and props are being manipulated on the dom or simply rendering to the previous page did not stop.
What solution I found
import {Redirect} from 'react-router-dom'
if (true) {
return <redirect to="/new-route" />
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
If you are fetching data from axios and the error still occurs, just wrap the setter inside the condition
let isRendered = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isRendered = true;
axios
.get("/sample/api")
.then(res => {
if (isRendered) {
setState(res.data);
}
return null;
})
.catch(err => console.log(err));
return () => {
isRendered = false;
};
}, []);
I have 2 solutions for this error:
return:
If you are used hook and useEffect, So put a return end of useEffect.
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
return () => {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
}
}, [])
componentWillUnmount:
If you are used componentDidMount, So put componentWillUnmount next to it.
componentDidMount() {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
componentWillUnmount() {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
The isMounted approach is an anti-pattern in most cases because it doesn't actually clean up/cancel anything, it just avoids changing state on unmounted components, but does nothing with pending asynchronous tasks. The React team recently removed the leak warning because users keep creating a lot of anti-patterns to hide the warning rather than fix its cause.
But writing cancellable code in plain JS can be really tricky. To fix this I made my own lib useAsyncEffect2 with custom hooks, built on top of a cancellable promise (c-promise2) for executing cancellable async code to reach its graceful cancellation. All async stages (promises), including deep ones, are cancellable. This means that the request here will be automatically aborted if its parent context is canceled. Of course, any other asynchronous operation can be used instead of a request.
useAsyncEffect Demo with plain useState usage (Live Demo):
import React, { useState } from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({url}) {
const [text, setText] = useState("");
const cancel = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
setText("fetching...");
const json = (yield cpAxios(url)).data;
setText(`Success: ${JSON.stringify(json)}`);
},
[url]
);
return (
<div>
<div>{text}</div>
<button onClick={cancel}>
Cancel request
</button>
</div>
);
}
useAsyncEffect Demo with internal states usage (Live Demo):
import React from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({ url, timeout }) {
const [cancel, done, result, err] = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
return (yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout)).data;
},
{ states: true, deps: [url] }
);
return (
<div>
{done ? (err ? err.toString() : JSON.stringify(result)) : "loading..."}
<button onClick={cancel} disabled={done}>
Cancel async effect (abort request)
</button>
</div>
);
}
Class component using decorators (Live demo)
import React, { Component } from "react";
import { ReactComponent } from "c-promise2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
#ReactComponent
class TestComponent extends Component {
state = {
text: ""
};
*componentDidMount(scope) {
const { url, timeout } = this.props;
const response = yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout);
this.setState({ text: JSON.stringify(response.data, null, 2) });
}
render() {
return (<div>{this.state.text}</div>);
}
}
export default TestComponent;
More other examples:
Axios request with errors handling
Fetch weather by coords
Live search
Pause & Resume
Progress capturing
Edit: I just realized the warning is referencing a component called TextLayerInternal. That's likely where your bug is. The rest of this is still relevant, but it might not fix your problem.
1) Getting the instance of a component for this warning is tough. It looks like there is some discussion to improve this in React but there currently is no easy way to do it. The reason it hasn't been built yet, I suspect, is likely because components are expected to be written in such a way that setState after unmount isn't possible no matter what the state of the component is. The problem, as far as the React team is concerned, is always in the Component code and not the Component instance, which is why you get the Component Type name.
That answer might be unsatisfactory, but I think I can fix your problem.
2) Lodashes throttled function has a cancel method. Call cancel in componentWillUnmount and ditch the isComponentMounted. Canceling is more "idiomatically" React than introducing a new property.
UPDATE DO NOT USE MY ORIGINAL ANSWER AS IT DOES NOT WORK
This answer was based on the use of cancelable promises and a note in makecancelable which I migrated to use hooks. However, it appears it does not cancel a chain of async/await and even cancelable-promise does not support canceling of a chain of awaits
Doing a bit more research on this, it appears that some internal Google reasons prevented cancelable promises from coming into the standard.
Further more, there was some promise with Bluebird which introduces cancelable promises, but it does not work in Expo or at least I haven't seen an example of it working in Expo.
The accepted answer is the best. Since I use TypeScript I had adapted the code with a few modifications (I explicitly set the dependencies since the accepted answer's implicit dependencies appear to give a re-render loop on my app, added and use async/await rather than promise chain, pass a ref to the mounted object so that an async/await chain can be canceled earlier if needed)
/**
* This starts an async function and executes another function that performs
* React state changes if the component is still mounted after the async
* operation completes
* #template T
* #param {(mountedRef: React.MutableRefObject<boolean>) => Promise<T>} asyncFunction async function,
* it has a copy of the mounted ref so an await chain can be canceled earlier.
* #param {(asyncResult: T) => void} onSuccess this gets executed after async
* function is resolved and the component is still mounted
* #param {import("react").DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useAsyncSetEffect(asyncFunction, onSuccess, deps) {
const mountedRef = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
mountedRef.current = true;
(async () => {
const x = await asyncFunction(mountedRef);
if (mountedRef.current) {
onSuccess(x);
}
})();
return () => {
mountedRef.current = false;
};
}, deps);
}
Original answer
Since I have many different operations that are async, I use the cancelable-promise package to resolve this issue with minimal code changes.
Previous code:
useEffect(() =>
(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})(),
[]
);
New code:
import { cancelable } from "cancelable-promise";
...
useEffect(
() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
},
[]
);
You can alsowrpte it in a custom utility function like this
/**
* This wraps an async function in a cancelable promise
* #param {() => PromiseLike<void>} asyncFunction
* #param {React.DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useCancelableEffect(asyncFunction, deps) {
useEffect(() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(asyncFunction());
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
}, deps);
}
In my case of a login-like screen, the fetch was done in a onClick handler of a parent component, who passed that handler down to the child, whom placed .catch and .finally on it.
In the .then case a redirect (and hence unmount) would happen as normal operation, and only in cases of fetch error would the child stay mounted on-screen.
My solution was moving the setState and all other code from the .finally to the .catch since the child is guaranteed to be mounted in the .catch case. And in the .then case nothing needed doing because of the guaranteed unmount.
Based on #ford04 answer, here is the same encapsulated in a method :
import React, { FC, useState, useEffect, DependencyList } from 'react';
export function useEffectAsync( effectAsyncFun : ( isMounted: () => boolean ) => unknown, deps?: DependencyList ) {
useEffect( () => {
let isMounted = true;
const _unused = effectAsyncFun( () => isMounted );
return () => { isMounted = false; };
}, deps );
}
Usage:
const MyComponent : FC<{}> = (props) => {
const [ asyncProp , setAsyncProp ] = useState( '' ) ;
useEffectAsync( async ( isMounted ) =>
{
const someAsyncProp = await ... ;
if ( isMounted() )
setAsyncProp( someAsyncProp ) ;
});
return <div> ... ;
} ;
Depending on how you open your webpage, you may not be causing a mounting. Such as using a <Link/> back to a page that was already mounted in the virtual DOM, so requiring data from a componentDidMount lifecycle is caught.
Here is a simple solution for this. This warning is due to when we do some fetch request while that request is in the background (because some requests take some time.)and we navigate back from that screen then they react cannot update the state. here is the example code for this. write this line before every state Update.
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
Here is the Complete Code
import React , {useRef} from 'react'
import { Text,StatusBar,SafeAreaView,ScrollView, StyleSheet } from 'react-native'
import BASEURL from '../constants/BaseURL';
const SearchScreen = () => {
const isScreenMounted = useRef(true)
useEffect(() => {
return () => isScreenMounted.current = false
},[])
const ConvertFileSubmit = () => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(true)
var formdata = new FormData();
var file = {
uri: `file://${route.params.selectedfiles[0].uri}`,
type:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].minetype}`,
name:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].displayname}`,
};
formdata.append("file",file);
fetch(`${BASEURL}/UploadFile`, {
method: 'POST',
body: formdata,
redirect: 'manual'
}).then(response => response.json())
.then(result => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(false)
}).catch(error => {
console.log('error', error)
});
}
return(
<>
<StatusBar barStyle="dark-content" />
<SafeAreaView>
<ScrollView
contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior="automatic"
style={styles.scrollView}>
<Text>Search Screen</Text>
</ScrollView>
</SafeAreaView>
</>
)
}
export default SearchScreen;
const styles = StyleSheet.create({
scrollView: {
backgroundColor:"red",
},
container:{
flex:1,
justifyContent:"center",
alignItems:"center"
}
})
I solved this problem by providing all the params that are used in the useEffect hook
The code reported the bug:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId]);
The code after fix:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId,level]);
Can see that , problems solved after I provided all the params(including the level param) that supposed to pass through.
I had a similar problem and solved it :
I was automatically making the user logged-in by dispatching an action on redux
( placing authentication token on redux state )
and then I was trying to show a message with this.setState({succ_message: "...")
in my component.
Component was looking empty with the same error on console : "unmounted component".."memory leak" etc.
After I read Walter's answer up in this thread
I've noticed that in the Routing table of my application ,
my component's route wasn't valid if user is logged-in :
{!this.props.user.token &&
<div>
<Route path="/register/:type" exact component={MyComp} />
</div>
}
I made the Route visible whether the token exists or not.
In my case the issue was that the parent component was hidding the child because of a condition change in the child component.
So what I did was to change the condition so the child component was always shown.
What was happening:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
if (someCondition) {
return null;
}
return (
<>
Some cool text here
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
const ChildModalComponent: FC = () => {
...
const handleSubmit = () => {
setSomeCondition(true);
}
}
So after clicking submit the modal was automatically hidden becasue of the parent condition (someCondition).
How did I fix it?
I changed the place where the someCondition was checked in the Parent component, so the child component was always shown:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
return (
<>
{!someCondition && <>Some cool text here</>
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
I faced same warning, not it is fixed. To fix the issue, I removed the useRef() variable check in useEffect()
Earlier, the code was
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, []);
Now, the code is
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
//if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, [])
Hope, it helps...
Inspired by the accepted answer by #ford04 I had even better approach dealing with it, instead of using useEffect inside useAsync create a new function that returns a callback for componentWillUnmount :
function asyncRequest(asyncRequest, onSuccess, onError, onComplete) {
let isMounted=true
asyncRequest().then((data => isMounted ? onSuccess(data):null)).catch(onError).finally(onComplete)
return () => {isMounted=false}
}
...
useEffect(()=>{
return asyncRequest(()=>someAsyncTask(arg), response=> {
setSomeState(response)
},onError, onComplete)
},[])
const handleClick = async (item: NavheadersType, index: number) => {
const newNavHeaders = [...navheaders];
if (item.url) {
await router.push(item.url); =>>>> line causing error (causing route to happen)
// router.push(item.url); =>>> coreect line
newNavHeaders.forEach((item) => (item.active = false));
newNavHeaders[index].active = true;
setnavheaders([...newNavHeaders]);
}
};
The simplest and most compact solution (with an explanation) is seen below as a one-liner solution.
useEffect(() => { return () => {}; }, []);
The useEffect() example above returns a callback function triggers React to finish its unmount portion of its life-cycle prior to updating state.
That very simplistic solution is all that is needed. In addition, it also works unlike the fictional syntax provided by #ford04 and #sfletche . By the way, the below code snippet from #ford04 is purely imaginary syntax (#sfletche , #vinod , #guneetgstar , and #Drew Cordano used the very same imaginary syntax).
data => {       <--- Fictional/Imaginary Syntax
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
All of my linters and all the linters of my entire team will not accept it and they report Uncaught SyntaxError: unexpected token: '=>'. I am surprised that no one caught the imaginary syntax. Would anyone who has participated in this question-thread, particularly among the up-voters, explain to me how they got the solutions to work for them?
Inspired by #ford04 answer I use this hook, which also takes callbacks for success, errors, finally and an abortFn:
export const useAsync = (
asyncFn,
onSuccess = false,
onError = false,
onFinally = false,
abortFn = false
) => {
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
const run = async () => {
try{
let data = await asyncFn()
if (isMounted && onSuccess) onSuccess(data)
} catch(error) {
if (isMounted && onError) onSuccess(error)
} finally {
if (isMounted && onFinally) onFinally()
}
}
run()
return () => {
if(abortFn) abortFn()
isMounted = false
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess])
}
If the asyncFn is doing some kind of fetch from back-end it often makes sense to abort it when the component is unmounted (not always though, sometimes if ie. you're loading some data into a store you might as well just want to finish it even if component is unmounted)

Mock different results of an api called inside react component in jest

I have a react component that calls an API that returns two different results which the default value is
{init:false}
And based on users actions, it will be true:
{init:true}
Now I want to test these two states in my app.test.tsx, It will work when I skip one of them(each working fine without another one):
import { screen } from '#testing-library/react';
import { render } from 'src/mocks/renderViaAllProviders';
import App from './app';
import * as apis from 'src/api/consul';
import { mockedRawConsul } from 'src/mocks/db/consul';
test("Show init page when 'initialized:false' in consul.", async () => {
render(<App />);
const loading = screen.getByRole('heading', { name: /loading/i });
expect(loading).toBeInTheDocument();
const initTitle = await screen.findByRole('heading', {
name: /init page/i
});
expect(initTitle).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test("Show Login page when 'initialized:true' in consul", async () => {
const initializedConsul = {
...mockedRawConsul,
...{ configs: { initialized: true } }
};
/*eslint-disable */
//#ts-ignore
apis.getConsulPublicConfig = jest.fn(() =>
Promise.resolve(initializedConsul)
);
render(<App />);
const loginButton = await screen.findByRole('button', {
name: /regularLogin/i
});
expect(loginButton).toBeInTheDocument();
});
How can I fix this?
Update
Here is the reprex and the error :
● Show Login page when 'initialized:true' in consul
Unable to find role="textbox"
console.error
TypeError: Cannot read property 'status' of undefined
at onResponseRejected (\src\api\
service\interceptors.ts:18:23)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:95:5)
at getLicense (\src\api\license .
ts:10:20)
I have tried to simulate the example that you are trying, I am able to mock the API which returns different results and test for the same, but since we want different results when a Component is rendered the API will be called only once(assuming the API is called on mounting) and upon some user actions the Component will be mounted again that's why called render function again not sure whether it is a good practice or not
//App.js
export default function App() {
const [value, setValue] = useState('loading');
const [show, setShow] = useState({init: false})
useEffect(() => {
setTimeout(() => {
setValue('init page')
fetchData().then(data => {
setShow(data)
}).catch((error) => {
console.log(`ERROR`)
})
},0)
},[])
const { init = false} = show
return (
<>
<p>IT S APP</p>
<h1>Value is {value}</h1>
{ init ? <button>regular Login</button> : null}
</>
);
}
//api.js
function fetchData() {
return fetch("https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts").then((response) =>
Promise.resolve({init: true})
);
}
export { fetchData };
//App.test.js
import App from "./App";
import { fetchData }from './api';
jest.mock('./api')
describe("<App />", () => {
it("check if loading, login button is present",async () => {
fetchData.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve({init: false}))
fetchData.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve({init: true}))
render(<App />);
const loading = screen.getByRole('heading', { name: /loading/i });
expect(loading).toBeInTheDocument();
const initTitle = await screen.findByRole('heading', {
name: /init page/i
});
expect(initTitle).toBeInTheDocument();
render(<App />);
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.queryByRole('button', {
name: /regular Login/i
})).toBeInTheDocument();
})
});
});

Test lazy loaded components in Enzyme

Given a simple App containing multiple lazy loaded routes,
import React, { lazy, Suspense } from "react";
import { Route } from "react-router-dom";
import "./styles.css";
const Component = lazy(() => import("./Component"));
const PageNotFound = lazy(() => import("./PageNotFound"));
export default function App() {
return (
<div className="App">
<Route
path="/component"
exact
render={() => (
<Suspense fallback={<div>Loading..</div>}>
<Component />
</Suspense>
)}
/>
<Route
path="*"
render={() => (
<Suspense fallback={<div>Loading..</div>}>
<PageNotFound />
</Suspense>
)}
/>
</div>
);
}
How can tests be made to check if those components are being rendered on that specific route?
Here's the App.test with what I tried:
import { configure, shallow, mount } from "enzyme";
import Adapter from "#wojtekmaj/enzyme-adapter-react-17";
import React from "react";
import { MemoryRouter } from "react-router-dom";
import App from "./App";
import Component from "./Component";
import PageNotFound from "./PageNotFound";
configure({ adapter: new Adapter() });
describe("App", () => {
it("renders without crashing", () => {
shallow(<App />);
});
it("renders lazy loaded PageNotFound route", () => {
// Act
const wrapper = mount(
<MemoryRouter initialEntries={["/random"]}>
<App />
</MemoryRouter>
);
// Assert
// expect(wrapper.containsMatchingElement(<PageNotFound />)).toEqual(true);
// expect(wrapper.find(PageNotFound)).toHaveLength(1);
expect(wrapper.exists(PageNotFound)).toEqual(true);
});
});
All 3 assertions don't seem to be working due to Suspense; A working snippet can be found at codesandbox here - Make sure to go on the 'tests' tab in order to see the failing tests.
Any suggestion is highly appreciated, thank you in advance!
This is an interesting question which is hard to have a best way to mock since the lazy(() => import('path/to/file')) takes a function as argument so we can't detect the value of anonymous function.
But I think I have a solution for you but it's not best to test all cases but a specific case it would work. You would mock as following:
jest.mock('react', () => {
const React = jest.requireActual('react');
// Always render children as our lazy mock component
const Suspense = ({ children }) => {
return children;
};
const lazy = () => {
// `require` component directly as we want to see
// Why? Above reason
return require('./PageNotFound').default;
}
return {
...React,
lazy,
Suspense
};
});
Update a new way to mock lazy function
I think I have a better idea to invoke the lazy argument then return as a component as following:
jest.mock('react', () => {
const React = jest.requireActual('react');
const Suspense = ({ children }) => {
return children;
};
const lazy = jest.fn().mockImplementation((fn) => {
const Component = (props) => {
const [C, setC] = React.useState();
React.useEffect(() => {
fn().then(v => {
setC(v)
});
}, []);
return C ? <C.default {...props} /> : null;
}
return Component;
})
return {
...React,
lazy,
Suspense
};
});
Then you have to wait the component updated which is returned in mock lazy so we wait component to re-paint as following:
// keep warning `act` removed
import { act } from 'react-dom/test-utils';
// A helper to update wrapper
const waitForComponentToPaint = async (wrapper) => {
await act(async () => {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve));
wrapper.update();
});
};
it("renders PageNotFound", async () => {
const wrapper = mount(
<MemoryRouter initialEntries={["/random"]}>
<App />
</MemoryRouter>
);
await waitForComponentToPaint(wrapper);
expect(wrapper.exists(PageNotFound)).toEqual(true);
});
it("renders Component", async () => {
const wrapper = mount(
<MemoryRouter initialEntries={["/component"]}>
<App />
</MemoryRouter>
);
await waitForComponentToPaint(wrapper);
expect(wrapper.exists(Component)).toEqual(true);
});
Another update for link
I've created a repl.it link for you to check how it works: https://repl.it/#tmhao2005/js-cra
You can run the test: yarn test -- lazy. And browse the code under src/Lazy.
Below is my working version :
import { act, } from 'react-dom/test-utils';
const waitForComponentToPaint = async (wrapper) => {
await act(async () => {
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve));
wrapper.update();
});
};
jest.mock('react', () => {
const ReactActual = jest.requireActual('react');
// Always render children as our lazy mock component
const Suspense = ({
children,
}) => children;
const lazyImport = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
class SpyComponent extends ReactActual.Component {
componentDidMount() {}
render() {
const {
path,
} = this.props;
const LazyComponent = require(path).default;
return (
<>
{LazyComponent ? <LazyComponent {...this.props} /> : null}
</>
);
}
}
return SpyComponent;
});
return {
...ReactActual,
lazy: lazyImport,
Suspense,
};
});
describe('Render <Header />', () => {
it('should render a Header', async () => {
const wrapper = mount(
<Header />
);
await waitForComponentToPaint(wrapper);
expect(wrapper.find('XXXXXX')).to.have.length(1);
});
});
And I added a path props when calling the lazy component :
<CustomLazyComponent
path="./CustomLazyComponent"
/>

How to use enzyme to test component with asyn lifecircle function?

I'm using jest and enzyme to test my component. And in this component, I will request data in componentDidMount, and then it will render view with the data.
class App extends React.Component {
async componentDidMount() {
const data = await getData(); // send a request to server to get data
this.setState({
name: data.name,
})
}
render() {
return (
<div>{this.state.name}</div>
)
}
}
It is a very simple component, just only use async function in componentDidMount, and get data width a async way, not callback. But, I don't know how to test this component.
I'd like write test code like this
it('render', async () => {
const container = mount(
<App />
);
const instance = container.instance();
console.log(instanct.state.name); // of course, state.name is undefined, but I want in this place, the state.name can be 'qyt'
});
I created a demo project on Github here.
The solution I went with was to mock the getData module:
let mockPromise;
jest.mock("./getData", () => {
return jest.fn(() => {
mockPromise = Promise.resolve({ name: "Spider man" });
return mockPromise;
});
});
Then I returned the mockPromise in my test. Jest will wait for the promise to resolve before completing the test.
it("renders without crashing", () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<App />);
return mockPromise.then((a) => {
wrapper.update();
expect(wrapper.html()).toEqual(`<h1>Name: Spider man</h1>`);
});
});

Categories