How to get react props inside a map() function - javascript

Suppose I have a react function with props active.
// About Page
export default function About() {
return <Menu active="about" />;
}
// Menu Component
function Menu(props) {
const items = ["home", "about", "services", "contact"];
return (
<nav>
{items.map((item, index) => {
console.log(props);
return <li className={`${props.active === item && "active"}`}> {item} </li>;
})}
</nav>
);
}
How do I get the props.active inside the map() function? it's returning undefined right now.

Converted to snippet, Seems props is getting correctly.
(not related, but minor fix, if you use && in class name generation, for the falsy condition classname will be "false")
function About() {
return <Menu active="about" />;
}
function Menu(props) {
const items = ["home", "about", "services", "contact"];
return (
<nav>
{items.map((item, index) => {
console.log(props);
return (
<li className={`${props.active === item ? "active" : "inactive"}`}> {item} </li>
);
})}
</nav>
);
}
ReactDOM.render(<About />, document.getElementById('app'))
.active {
color: red
}
.inactive {
color: grey
}
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react#17/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#17/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>
<div id="app"> </div>

The above sample code in question works flawlessly.
In my project, I was actually modifying the wrong page to provide props, thus got {}
So, I'm writing this answer so that other people won't spend time on it.

Related

Button click renders multiple unwanted components React

My problem is this: I have a component that must be rendered 3 times in the app, and the component has a button which should update the component with a new component. I'm getting the placeholder component in each instance instead of just the component that triggered the event. My code:
class App extends Component {
constructor(){
super()
this.state = {showCard : false,cards : []}
this.buttonClick = this.buttonClick.bind(this)
}
buttonClick(ev){
console.log(ev.target)
const nextId = this.state.cards.length + 1
this.setState({cards: this.state.cards.concat([nextId])})
this.setState({showCard: true,})
}
render() {
console.log(this)
return (
<div className="App">
<h2>React Demo</h2>
<ul className="container">
<Contact key="0" text={"Contact 1"} buttonClick={this.buttonClick} showCard={this.state.showCard} cards={this.state.cards}/>
<Contact key="1" text={"Contact 2"} buttonClick={this.buttonClick} showCard={this.state.showCard} cards={this.state.cards}/>
<Contact key="2" text={"Contact 3"} buttonClick={this.buttonClick} showCard={this.state.showCard} cards={this.state.cards}/>
</ul>
</div>
);
}
}
function Contact(props){
return <li>
<h3>{props.text}</h3>
<ul className="stack">
<li><button id={props.text} type="button" className="block" onClick={e =>props.buttonClick(e)}>+</button></li>
{props.cards.map(cardId => <Card key={props.text+cardId}/>)}
</ul>
</li>
}
function Card(){
return <li><div className="card">Place Holder</div></li>
}
export default App;
I have tried conditional rendering with showCard and mapping as seen here, in both cases all three of instances of the component are updated instead of the correct one. I know it's something stupid I'm doing, I just can't see it. Thanks in advance.
J
Updated code:
const list = [
{
id : 0,
title : "Contact 1",
showCard : false,
addCard : ()=> <Card key={"x"+count++}/>,
cards : []
},
{
id : 1,
title : "Contact 2",
showCard : false,
addCard : ()=> <Card key={"y"+count++}/>,
cards : []
},
{
id : 2,
title : "Contact 3",
showCard : false,
addCard : ()=> <Card key={"z"+count++}/>,
cards : []
}
]
let count = 0
class App extends Component {
constructor(){
super()
this.state = {list : list}
this.buttonClick = this.buttonClick.bind(this)
}
buttonClick(ev,id){
let a0 = null
for(let obj of this.state.list){
if(obj.id === id){
a0 = obj.addCard()
obj.cards.push(a0)
}
}
this.setState({list:this.state.list})
}
render() {
return (
<div className="App">
<h2>React Demo</h2>
<ul className="container">
{this.state.list.map((item) =>
<Contact key={item.title+item.id} text={item.title} buttonClick={this.buttonClick} showCard={item.showCard} id={item.id} cards={item.cards}/>
)}
</ul>
</div>
);
}
}
function Contact(props){
return <li>
<h3>{props.text}</h3>
<ul className="stack">
<li><button id={props.text} type="button" className="block" onClick={e =>props.buttonClick(e,props.id)}>+</button></li>
{props.cards.map((card)=> {
return card || null
})}
</ul>
</li>
}
function Card(){
return <li><div className="card">Place Holder</div></li>
}
export default App;
As Jonas H suggested I was sharing state with all three instances of the Contact component. I've only been doing React for a couple of weeks hence the time it took to solve this. My solution may not be optimal, but it works, although it did break my UI... but that's another mission. Thanks to all.
J
Thanks to #Jonas H
shouldComponentUpdate() method will solve your problem
Use shouldComponentUpdate() to let React know if a component’s output is not affected by the current change in state or props. The default behavior is to re-render on every state change, and in the vast majority of cases you should rely on the default behavior. more
shouldComponentUpdate(nextProps, nextState) {
// should return either true or fase
// component should render on state changes or initial render
if((JSON.stringify(nextState) !== JSON.stringify(this.state)) || (JSON.stringify(this.state) === (JSON.stringify({showCard : false,cards : []})) ) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
put above method to your code

React: Use props or array of these

Could you tell me please. How can I make React component which I can use with props or with array of these props.
For example I have this component:
import React, { Component } from 'react'
export default class Links extends Component {
render () {
return (
<a
href={ this.props.link }
>
{ this.props.name }
</a>
)
}
}
And I want to use this component here:
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import Links from './Links'
export default class Block extends Component {
render () {
const social = [{
name: 'Twitter',
link: 'https://twitter.com',
}, {
name: 'FaceBook',
link: 'https://fb.com',
}]
return (
<div>
<div>
<Links someword={ social }>
</div>
<Links name={ 'Google' } link={ 'https://google.com' }>
</div>
)
}
}
Loop through your social array and map each value to your Links component and then put it in the render function of your Block component.
export default class Block extends Component {
render () {
const social = [{
name: 'Twitter',
link: 'https://twitter.com',
}, {
name: 'FaceBook',
link: 'https://fb.com',
}]
const linkComps = social.map(e =>
<Links name={ e.name } link={e.link} key={e.name} />;
);
return (
<div>
<div>
{ linkComps }
</div>
<Links name={ 'Google' } link={ 'https://google.com' }>
</div>
)
}
}
You can use map to iterate the array and create the Links component. Since your social variable is having the const value, so instead of defining that inside render method, define it outside in the starting of the file.
Write it like this:
const social = [{
name: 'Twitter',
link: 'https://twitter.com',
}, {
name: 'FaceBook',
link: 'https://fb.com',
}
]
class Block extends React.Component {
render () {
return (
<div>
<div>
{
social.map((el,i) => <Links
key={i}
name={el.name}
link={el.link} />)
}
</div>
<Links name={ 'Google' } link={ 'https://google.com' }/>
</div>
)
}
}
class Links extends React.Component {
render () {
return (
<a
href={ this.props.link }
>
{ this.props.name }
</a>
)
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Block/>, document.getElementById('app'))
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id='app'/>
If you want to handle that inside Links component, you can write it like this, You can pass either an array by name array or pass the individual value by name and Link.
export default class Links extends Component {
_renderLinks(){
if(this.props.array && Array.isArray(this.props.array)){
return this.props.array.map((el,i) => <a
key={i}
href={ el.link}
>
{el.name}
</a>
}else{
return <a href={ this.props.link}> {this.props.name} </a>
}
}
render () {
return (
<div>
{this._renderLinks()}
</div>
)
}
}
The usual way to render multiple components from an array of props is with map:
render() {
// ...
return (
<div>
{social.map(props => (
<Link key={props.link} {...props}/>
))}
</div>
);
}
That said, having a single component that takes two different kinds of props is, generally speaking, a bad idea. That is to say, a component should take e.g. name and link props or it should take an array of objects with those properties. It should not do both.
A clean way to solve your problem is to have two components: A <Link> component that takes name and link props and renders a single link, and a <Links> (plural) component that takes an array of objects with those properties and renders a <Link> (singular) component for each one.
A basic implementation looks like the below. Click on ▸⃝ Run code snippet below to see it in action (note that I added some CSS just to show the boundaries of each component).
const Link = ({name, link}) => (
<a href={link}>{name}</a>
);
const Links = ({links}) => (
<div>
{links.map(props => <Link key={props.link} {...props}/>)}
</div>
);
class Block extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
{/* Render an array of links with <Links> */}
<Links links={this.props.social}/>
{/* Render a single link with <Link> */}
<Link name="Google" link="https://google.com"/>
</div>
);
}
}
const social = [
{ name: 'Twitter',
link: 'https://twitter.com',
},
{ name: 'Facebook',
link: 'https://facebook.com',
}
];
ReactDOM.render(<Block social={social}/>, document.querySelector('div'));
a {display: block;}
div div {border: 1px dotted gray; padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div></div>

Return multiple React elements in a method without a wrapper element

I'm trying to return multiple React elements from a helper method. I could solve it simply by moving around some code, but I'm wondering if there's a cleaner way to solve it. I have a method that returns part of the render method, and that functions needs to return both a React element and some text. It's clearer through an example:
class Foo extends React.Component {
_renderAuthor() {
if (!this.props.author) {
return null;
}
return [
' by ',
<a href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>,
]; // Triggers warning: Each child in an array or iterator should have a unique "key" prop.
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.title}
{this._renderAuthor()}
</div>
);
}
}
I know the render method has to return exactly 1 React element. Using a helper method like this would trigger a warning, and fixing the warning (by adding keys) would make the code too convoluted. Is there a clean way to do this without triggering a warning?
Edit:
Another use case:
render() {
return (
<div>
{user
? <h2>{user.name}</h2>
<p>{user.info}</p>
: <p>User not found</p>}
</div>
);
}
Edit 2:
Turns out this isn't possible yet, I wrote about 2 workarounds here: https://www.wptutor.io/web/js/react-multiple-elements-without-wrapper
Support has been added using the Fragment component. This is a first-class component.
So you can now use:
render() {
return (
<React.Fragment>
<ChildA />
<ChildB />
<ChildC />
</React.Fragment>
);
}
For more information visit: https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/11/28/react-v16.2.0-fragment-support.html
The error message tells you exactly how to solve this:
Each child in an array or iterator should have a unique "key" prop.
Instead of this:
return [
' by ',
<a href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>,
];
Do this:
return [
<span key="by"> by </span>,
<a key="author" href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>,
];
Yes, you need to wrap the text node ("by") in a span in order to give it a key. Such are the breaks. As you can see, I've just given each element a static key, since there's nothing dynamic about them. You could just as well use key="1" and key="2" if you wanted.
Alternatively, you could do this:
return <span> by <a href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a></span>;
...which obviates the need for keys.
Here's the former solution in a working snippet:
const getAuthorUrl = author => `/${author.toLowerCase()}`;
class Foo extends React.Component {
_renderAuthor() {
if (!this.props.author) {
return null;
}
return [
<span key="by"> by </span>,
<a key="author" href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>,
];
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.datePosted}
{this._renderAuthor()}
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Foo datePosted="Today" author="Me"/>, document.getElementById('container'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="container"></div>
It's not currently possible to do this without some sort of workaround like wrapping everything in another component, since it ends up with the underlying React code trying to return multiple objects.
See this active Github issue where support for this is being considered for a future version though.
Edit: You can now do this with Fragments in React 16, see:
https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/11/28/react-v16.2.0-fragment-support.html
There is another way to solve this. I will suggest you create another component Author.js:
function Author(props) {
return (<span>
<span> by </span>
<a href={props.getAuthorUrl(props.author)}>{props.author}</a>
</span>)
}
class Foo extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.title}
{this.props.author && <Author author={this.props.author} getAuthorUrl={this.getAuthorUrl} />}
</div>
);
}
}
I didn't test this code though. But it will look more cleaner I think. Hope it helps.
I like to have an If-component around for such things, and I have wrapped everything into a span, as it doesn't really break anything and makes the need for keys go away...
const getAuthorUrl = author => `/${author.toLowerCase()}`;
function If({condition,children}) {
return condition ? React.Children.only(children) : null;
}
class Foo extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.datePosted}
<If condition={this.props.author}>
<span> by
<a key="author" href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>
{this.props.author}
</a>
</span>
</If>
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Foo datePosted="Today" author="Me"/>, document.getElementById('container'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="container"></div>
...skipping the array thing altogether?
This is a bit hacky but it doesn't have unnecessary jsx as you wished.
var author = 'Daniel';
var title = 'Hello';
var Hello = React.createClass({
_renderAutho0r: function() {
if (!author) {
return null;
}
return {author}
},
render: function() {
var by = author ? ' by ' : null;
return (
<div>
{title}
{by}
{this._renderAutho0r()}
</div>
);
}
});
React.render(<Hello name="World" />, document.body);
my JSFiddle
You can return fragments from sub-rendering functions but not from the main render function, at least before React 16. In order to do so, return an array of components. You don't need to set keys manually unless your fragment children will change (arrays are keyed with indices by default).
For creating fragments you may also use createFragment.
For inline usage, you may use an array or leverage immediately invoked arrow function.
See the example below:
const getAuthorUrl = author => `/${author.toLowerCase()}`;
class Foo extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this._renderAuthor = this._renderAuthor.bind(this);
this._renderUser = this._renderUser.bind(this);
}
_renderAuthor() {
if (!this.props.author) {
return null;
}
return [
' by ',
<a href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>,
];
}
_renderUser() {
return [
<h2>{this.props.user.name}</h2>,
<p>{this.props.user.info}</p>
]
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.datePosted}
{this._renderAuthor()}
<div>
{this.props.user
? this._renderUser()
: <p>User not found</p>}
</div>
<div>
{this.props.user
? [
<h2>{this.props.user.name}</h2>,
<p>{this.props.user.info}</p>
]
: <p>User not found</p>}
</div>
<div>
{this.props.user
? (() => [
<h2>{this.props.user.name}</h2>,
<p>{this.props.user.info}</p>
])()
: <p>User not found</p>}
</div>
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Foo datePosted="Today" author="Me" user={{name: 'test', info: 'info'}} />, document.getElementById('container'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="container"></div>
In order to not get warnings each child must be assigned a key. In order to do so, instead of returning an array please use helper function fragment(...children) to assign index-based keys automatically. Please note that strings must be converted to spans or other nodes that can be assigned with a key:
const fragment = (...children) =>
children.map((child, index) =>
React.cloneElement(
typeof child === 'string'
? <span>{child}</span>
: child
, { key: index }
)
)
const getAuthorUrl = author => `/${author.toLowerCase()}`;
const fragment = (...children) =>
children.map((child, index) =>
React.cloneElement(
typeof child === 'string'
? <span>{child}</span>
: child
, { key: index }
)
)
class Foo extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this._renderAuthor = this._renderAuthor.bind(this);
this._renderUser = this._renderUser.bind(this);
}
_renderAuthor() {
if (!this.props.author) {
return null;
}
return fragment(
' by ',
<a href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>
);
}
_renderUser() {
return fragment(
<h2>{this.props.user.name}</h2>,
<p>{this.props.user.info}</p>
)
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.datePosted}
{this._renderAuthor()}
<div>
{this.props.user
? this._renderUser()
: <p>User not found</p>}
</div>
<div>
{this.props.user
? fragment(
<h2>{this.props.user.name}</h2>,
<p>{this.props.user.info}</p>
)
: <p>User not found</p>}
</div>
<div>
{this.props.user
? (() => fragment(
<h2>{this.props.user.name}</h2>,
<p>{this.props.user.info}</p>
))()
: <p>User not found</p>}
</div>
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Foo datePosted="Today" author="Me" user={{name: 'test', info: 'info'}} />, document.getElementById('container'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="container"></div>
Try this:
class Foo extends React.Component {
_renderAuthor() {
return <a href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.title}
{this.props.author && " by "}
{this.props.author && this._renderAuthor()}
</div>
);
}
}
Perhaps a more simple way would be to rethink how you're architecting your application. However, in a more simple way.
You're triggering the warning because you're trying to render from an array and not react elements but directly html. In order to approach this, you would have to do
{this._renderAuthor().map(
(k,i) => (React.addons.createFragment({k}))
) }
React addons createFragment function basically does that, it reduces your html elements into react fragments that you can render.
React createFragment documentation
Alternatively, in a much better approach, you can create an AuthorLink stateless component like this..
function AuthorLink(props) {
return (
<div className="author-link">
<span> by </span>
<a href={props.authorUrl}> {props.author} </a>
</div>
});
}
and use this in your main component's render
render() {
const { author } = this.props;
return (
<div>
{this.props.datePosted}
<AuthorLink url={getAuthorUrl(author)} author={author} />
</div>
);
}
Try this approach on your array:
return [
<span key={'prefix-'+random_string_generator()}>' by '</span>,
<a key={'prefix-'+random_string_generator()} href={getAuthorUrl(this.props.author)}>{this.props.author}</a>,
];

react - onclick using event without using arrow function

I have a link to return home and within that there is a button to remove an item from an array. To prevent the link to redirect to the home screen and to just remove the item from the array I am need to use ev.preventDefault().
Is it possible to pass an ev to a react method without using an arrow function in the render method? From my research and specifically the answer here it appears that the following is the only way to do so.
I am concerned that the arrow function causes a re-render every time, since new function is created on each render.
removeItem(label, e) {
e.preventDefault();
this.props.removeItem(label.id);
}
render () {
const { label } = this.props;
return (
<Link to'/'>
<span>Go Home</span>
<span onClick={(e) => this.removeItem(label, e) }> Click me <span>
</Link>
);
}
You could just remove the label parameter and get label from this.props directly. Refactor your app like this:
removeItem(ev) {
ev.preventDefault();
this.props.removeItem(this.props.label.id);
}
render () {
const { label } = this.props;
return (
<Link to'/'>
<span>Go Home</span>
<span onClick={this.removeItem}> Click me <span>
</Link>
);
}
This way, React will automatically pass the click event to your removeItem method.
Although, it should be said, that creating a new function on every render, probably isn't all that expensive.
In the light of avoiding to re-create the function you could extract the parameters into the class props. Here are some examples
For example this will create a new function all the time.
var List = React.createClass({
render() {
return (
<ul>
{this.props.items.map(item =>
<li key={item.id} onClick={this.props.onItemClick.bind(null, item.id)}>
...
</li>
)}
</ul>
);
}
});
Now it will not re-create the functions on re-rendering.
var List = React.createClass({
render() {
return (
<ul>
{this.props.items.map(item =>
<ListItem key={item.id} item={item} onItemClick={this.props.onItemClick} />
)}
</ul>
);
}
});
var ListItem = React.createClass({
render() {
return (
<li onClick={this._onClick}>
...
</li>
);
},
_onClick() {
this.props.onItemClick(this.props.item.id);
}
});
Here is some SO explanation React js onClick can't pass value to method

i is not defined using map() with ES6

Trying to create a li in react but failed. Error is near the map(), I got error of i is not defined, why?
const TodoItems = React.creatClass({
getInitialState() {
return {
items : [
{id:1,name:"Gym"},
{id:2,name:"Jump"},
{id:3,name:"Racing"}
]
}
},
renderItem(){
return(
<ul>
this.state.items.map(item,i =>
<li key={i}>item.name</li>
)
</ul>
)
},
render(){
return (
<renderItem />
)
}
})
When you have multiple arguments for an arrow function, you need to put () around them. So:
this.state.items.map((item,i) =>
// ------------------^------^
<li key={i}>item.name</li>
)
Your original code calls map with item as its first argument, and an arrow function taking a single argument (i) as its second argument.
You also need to put item.name in {} and put the call to map in {}:
renderItem(){
return(
<ul>
{this.state.items.map((item,i) =>
<li key={i}>{item.name}</li>
)}
</ul>
)
Then it works:
const { Component } = React;
const { render } = ReactDOM;
const TodoItems = React.createClass({
getInitialState() {
return {
items : [
{id:1,name:"Gym"},
{id:2,name:"Jump"},
{id:3,name:"Racing"}
]
}
},
renderItem(){
return(
<ul>
{this.state.items.map((item,i) =>
<li key={i}>{item.name}</li>
)}
</ul>
)
},
render(){
return this.renderItem();
}
});
render(<TodoItems /> , document.getElementById('items'));
<div id="items"></div>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
That became clear to me when I used Babel's REPL to compile the JSX and realized I was seeing "this.state.map((item,i) =>" as a string.
try this :
renderItem(){
return(
<ul>
{this.state.items.map((item,i) => {
return(
<li key={i}>item.name</li>);
})}
</ul>
)

Categories