I have a React JS app where, on a specific pages, I show different job offers, one by one, tinder style. My client asked me to put one "widget" from an external website on the job offer. The widget is a "div" with an external script from another website. This script is a bunch of "document.write", not even a selector for the div... Small problem: the script isn't called, so the relevant code isn't added inside the div.
How can I make sure that a tag I dynamically add will execute it's code? It doesn't even seem to get loaded in the "Network" tab of the website. The with the script inside is down a bunch of React components.
Anyone has an idea on how I can make the script load even if it's dynamically added?
Related
I am just currently learning React.js and I am trying to work on a simple project that can have some really heavy body content but I have to keep them in one page, so I chose tabbed components as a possible solution.
So what I'm planning is to put the tab contents into separate HTMLs and just include them into the main page hidden until their tab option is clicked, but does this mean that the HTMLs will only be loaded into the app once the tab option is clicked?
Normally I would think that the separate HTMLs would be loaded at the same time the main page is loaded, but using React.js, maybe the functionality is different?
Can someone please clarify this? Thank you very much!
A single page application is generally "loaded" immediately, and the views change based on interaction. So if you properly set up your layout, the content will be interpreted when you load the page.
What you are calling HTMLs is properly called Components. Everything in React is based on JavaScript. You would store your components in JavaScript files that end in .js not .html, and then a JavaScript function would return your JSX Component as its return value, which will trigger the DOM to reload.
I am writing a chat widget, that would be distributed to the end users with little code to put in their website. Usual routine.
My widget is going to be written in React. I know several ways to achieve this. Let me list the ways that I could think of.
Give a code snippet with directly iframe and source url in it. Problem with this approach is, it can be used only if the widget is embed. If the widget needs to be popup, flexibility will be lost.
Give a code snippet with a javascript being loaded asynchronously. Javascript will create an iframe in the parent webpage and src can be set. This widget javascript can have little intelligence. This is the usual approach followed by most of the widget developers.
Of course, source URL will render a React page which is bundled by webpack, in either case.
I wanted to know the best practices of developing a widget. So I went through the popular implementations of it. I liked Intercom's widget very much. It is written in React. I analyzed how it works.
The minimal javascript is loaded async on the webpage. It is injecting an iframe with id intercom-frame. That iframe has a script in it's head with a source URl. Obviously it is React bundle.
The thing that I don't understand is, below this iframe, a div is created with three iframes in it. One to show the chat bubble, another to show the chat bubble icon, the last one to show the actual chat window. Those iframe doesn't have source url and I guess the bundle is served from the first iframe created by the widget javascript.
I came across this SO question, which partially answers my question. From the answer,
expose some API between your customer webpage and your iframe, using window messaging.
the main code (the iframe code) is then loaded by this first script
asynchronously, and not included in it.
What I don't understand is,
1.) How they would have achieved it with window messaging?
2.) How they would have managed to create a div with iframes in it, from another iframes script?. Widget javascript is not creating those elements, based on it's source. It should have been done by the React bundle in the iframe generated by widget js.
3.) How a react bundle inside an iframe can create react elements in the parent DOM?
None of the iframe created by Intercom's script has src attribute, that means they are not subject to the same origin policy. Therefore, they can modify parent page html and vice versa.
However, I don't understand why they need to have separate iframe. And why using a script to inject another script which inject the main html content. Doesn't the first script have enough ability to inject html content? I'd love to be lightened about these things.
I am creating an application with Symfony2, where I have a main menu of options depending on the option selected dynamically opens a tab at a lower div with the content for that option. Content is loaded with load() of Jquery in the container div.You can see in the picture below:
The first problem was that in the HTML loaded in each tab could not use the js file initially loaded in the index.html, as you can see in this example you should check out a notice when we click the content of each tab, but does nothing .
The solution to this problem was included in each HTML code to load the appropriate script, and it worked properly. But to do it this way, if two HTML carry the same js, when one of the contents some event runs is repetite many times as tabs we have created, that is, if I open two different options (each in its own tab both charge the same js) by clicking on the first event associated performed twice, whereas if I do it in the second only done once. In short, whenever a function of a js used, is repeated as many times as there are dynamically loaded on the tabs.
And I tried event.preventDefault();orevent.stopPropagation(); and it does not solve the problem.
Would it be okay that it js is included twice in the overall structure of HTML? (Included in the initial head and then the container div)
Dynamically loading HTML + JavaScript is not the best approach for this case. I suggest that you use some JavaScript SPA framework, like AngularJS or ReactJS. Both are very big and well supported projects, so you can find tons of documentation and tutorials. You'll most likely end up using Symfony only as a RESTful service and Angular/React taking care of the rest (template loading, sending request to server, etc). Also, js frameworks will take care of deep linking and in the end you'll have a better working, easier to maintain application.
It is a bit more work initially, especially until you bootstrap the application, but then it gets easier to maintain and implement new functionality, so it pays off in the end. With your current approach you soon will find yourself in a big mess full of 100s of templates, js callbacks, inclusions, etc. I'm saying this from a personal experience!
Well...
Jquery works like this: when you attach an event to html, if the html does not exist, the event is attached to nothing. If the element exists then the event is correctly attached. It attaches only to existing elements when the on function is execute. That is a correct behaviour. In the past it used to exist a .live method that did exactly what you want: you attached an event and if you create the element after the attachment, the new element also contained the event.
Adding the js twice is not the solution. As you said after a click the button will be executed twice.
Why do not attach the events after loading the content? If you load it in the page start you can do in the main file:
$(function(){ // will force to execute the on method after all the page is loaded.
$('.submenu .button').on ('click', function (){
...
});
});
If you load the menu by ajax, in the callback and after adding the html menu to the main you must use the code I wrote above.
We are new to Umbraco and coding within it, so I thank you in advance for your patience and assistance.
In short, we created a 'test' page utilizing a colorbox pop-up to display a form. It works perfectly in the test page.
When trying to integrate the code into Umbraco, when the "Request Info" button is clicked, the form opens in a full page, and the colorbox does not display.
I would appreciate any assistance that you could provide.
Test link (working):
http://online.saintleo.edu/Colorbox/Untitled-1.html
Example of a page where the "Request Info" button (yellow on right) opens full page, and NOT colorbox:
http://online.saintleo.edu/academics/masters-programs/master-of-accounting-(macc).aspx
I've spent the entire weekend trying to find the solution, hoping to get this resolved ASAP.
Thank you in advance, I appreciate your time and assistance.
This looks like a problem with how you have implemented your script in Umbraco. Just looking through Chrome's browser inspector, I can see that your script is failing to find the colorbox objects which means that something is prevent the library from being available. This is usually because a dependent javascript library has failed.
Looking at your source code, you are loading all your jQuery libraries at the bottom of your page. This is good practice, but you have placed your a second jQuery file reference, your colorbox file references and the custom colorbox code in the head of the page.
There are several things you will need to do:
Remove the jQuery reference from the head of the page;
Move the colorbox file references to the bottom of the page, after all the other javascript file references. You can leave the colorbox CSS file reference in the head.
Move the custom colorbox code to after all the other javascript file references. I usually place this kind of code in a separate file.
Depending on your Umbraco implementation:
If you are using masterpages, use a ContentPlaceholder to allow templates to drop javascript file references into the bottom of the page;
If you are using MVC views, use a footer section to do the same
I'm using the jquery load function to switch out a div. Whenever I load a certain element via ajax that needs javascript to run -it won't work in the div. I know that this is because the element didn't exist in the dom on the initial page load.
I've googled for days and haven't found an answer that can give me an easy to understand explanation. Essentiallly, I'm told to just use .on or $getScript.
However, this doesn't seem to be the appropriate answer.
Since, each element loaded in the div has similar properties -I simply want to load the jquery library, and the same two external scripts in my index page's head section -and then make sure that those scripts stay "live" or append to the simple html content that is being externally loaded in the div via ajax.
So, for example, if page 1 has a div named bouncingcats, and page 2 has a div named bouncingdogs -that both require an external javascript named 'bounce' -I want to load the javascript file 'bounce' ONE TIME in the head section of my index page -and then dynamically swap out the div named bouncinganimals on my index page with either cats or dogs.
So far, it seems as if the only advice I'm getting is to just put the jquery library AND the bounce.js file at the end of page 1 and at the end of page 2. This, of course works -but it seems too redundant and of course slows down the ajax load.
Do you know of a way in which I could just load the jquery library and the external javascript page in my index page head once, and have them run when I load content via ajax into my div?
An issue that I have is that I didn't write the script bounce.js myself -and it is already minimized -so changing the script could prove to be extremely difficult. Is there something I can just wrap around the external javascript links themselves?