We Keep Coding

NextJS localStorage.getItem() method not working on components?

In my nextjs-app I want to use localstorage, to store some values across my application.
so inside the pages-folder I have a [slug].tsx-file where I do this:
export default function Page({ data}) {
useEffect(() => {
const page = {
title: data.page.title,
subtitle: data.page.subtitle,
slug: data.page.slug,
}
localStorage.setItem("page", JSON.stringify(page))
})
return ( ... some html....)
}
this basically stores the title, subtitle and slug for the current route.
Now, inside my components-folder I have a Nav.tsx-file, where I do this:
const Nav= () => {
const [pageData, setPageData] = useState()
useEffect(() => {
const current = JSON.parse(localStoraget.getItem('page'))
if(current){
setPageData(current)
}
},[])
return(...some html)
}
So far, the setItem works and in the application-tab of the google inspector I can see, that the key-values changes, each time a new route/page gets rendered BUT the getItem- always returns the same e.g. the key values do not change at all. What am I doing wrong? Is it maybe because the Nav component only gets rendered once?
Can someone help me out?

you have a spelling error from:
localStoraget.getItem('page')
to:
localStorage.getItem('page')
believe your issue also falls under localstorage should be used with async/await so maybe try something like:
const Nav= () => {
const [pageData, setPageData] = useState()
useEffect(() => {
async function settingData() {
const current = await JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('page'))
if(current)setPageData(current)
}
settingData()
},[])
return(...some html)
}

Note: You should avoid using localStorage to share the state over your App. React provides a good way of doing it with ContextAPI or you could use another lib such as Redux/MobX/Recoil.
At the time when the <Nav> component is rendered (and the useEffect runs) the localStorage probably still doesn't have the key-value set.
If you really want to use localStorage (but I suggest not using it), you can create a timeout to execute after some time and will try to get again the value. Something like this could work:
let localStorageTimer = null;
const Nav = () => {
const [pageData, setPageData] = useState()
useEffect(() => {
const getLocalStorageItems = () => {
const current = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('page'))
if (!current) {
localStorageTimer = setTimeout(() => getLocalStorageItems, 1000);
} else {
clearTimeout(localStorageTimer)
setPageData(current)
}
}
localStorageTimer = setTimeout(() => getLocalStorageItems, 1000);
return () => clearTimeout(localStorageTimer)
}, []);
return (.. your JSX code)
}

React: break dependency between 2 related contexts with top-level constant object

I'm working on a new major release for react-xarrows, and I came up with some messy situation.
It's not going to be simple to explain, so let's start with visualization:
consider the next example - 2 draggable boxes with an arrow drawn between them, and a wrapping context around them.
focused code:
<Xwrapper>
<DraggableBox box={box} />
<DraggableBox box={box2} />
<Xarrow start={'box1'} end={'box2'} {...xarrowProps} />
</Xwrapper>
Xwrapper is the context, DraggableBox and Xarrow are, well, you can guess.
My goal
I want to trigger a render on the arrow, and solely on the arrow, whenever one of the connected boxes renders.
My approach
I want to be able to rerender the arrow from the boxes, so I have to consume 'rerender arrow'(let's call it updateXarrow) function on the boxes, we can use a context and a useContext hook on the boxes to get this function.
I will call XelemContext to the boxes context.
also, I need to consume useContext on Xarrow because I want to cause a render on the arrow whenever I decide.
this must be 2 different contexts(so I could render xarrow solely). one on the boxes to consume 'updateXarrow', and a different context consumed on Xarrow to trigger the reredner.
so how can I pass this function from one context to another? well, I can't without making an infinite loop(or maybe I can but could not figure it out), so I used a local top-level object called updateRef.
// define a global object
const updateRef = { func: null };
const XarrowProvider = ({ children }) => {
// define updateXarrow here
...
// assign to updateRef.func
updateRef.func = updateXarrow;
return <XarrowContext.Provider value={updateXarrow}>{children}</XarrowContext.Provider>;
};
//now updateRef.func is defined because XelemProvider defined later
const XelemProvider = ({ children }) => {
return <XelemContext.Provider value={updateRef.func}>{children}</XelemContext.Provider>;
};
the thing is, that this object is not managed by react, and also, i will need to handle cases where there is multiple instances of Xwrapper, and I'm leaving the realm of React, so i have 2 main questions:
there is a better approach? maybe I can someone achieve my goal without going crazy?
if there is no better option, is this dangerous? I don't want to release a code that will break on edge cases on my lib consumer's apps.
Code
DraggableBox
const DraggableBox = ({ box }) => {
console.log('DraggableBox render', box.id);
const handleDrag = () => {
console.log('onDrag');
updateXarrow();
};
const updateXarrow = useXarrow();
return (
<Draggable onDrag={handleDrag} onStop={handleDrag}>
<div id={box.id} style={{ ...boxStyle, position: 'absolute', left: box.x, top: box.y }}>
{box.id}
</div>
</Draggable>
);
};
useXarrow
import React, { useContext, useEffect, useLayoutEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';
import { XelemContext } from './Xwrapper';
const useXarrow = () => {
const [, setRender] = useState({});
const reRender = () => setRender({});
const updateXarrow = useContext(XelemContext);
useLayoutEffect(() => {
updateXarrow();
});
return reRender;
};
export default useXarrow;
Xwrapper
import React, { useState } from 'react';
export const XelemContext = React.createContext(null as () => void);
export const XarrowContext = React.createContext(null as () => void);
const updateRef = { func: null };
const XarrowProvider = ({ children }) => {
console.log('XarrowProvider');
const [, setRender] = useState({});
const updateXarrow = () => setRender({});
updateRef.func = updateXarrow;
return <XarrowContext.Provider value={updateXarrow}>{children}</XarrowContext.Provider>;
};
const XelemProvider = ({ children }) => {
console.log('XelemProvider');
return <XelemContext.Provider value={updateRef.func}>{children}</XelemContext.Provider>;
};
const Xwrapper = ({ children }) => {
console.log('Xwrapper');
return (
<XarrowProvider>
<XelemProvider>{children}</XelemProvider>
</XarrowProvider>
);
};
export default Xwrapper;
const Xarrow: React.FC<xarrowPropsType> = (props: xarrowPropsType) => {
useContext(XarrowContext);
const svgRef = useRef(null);
....(more 1100 lines of code)
logs
I left some logs.
on drag event of a single box you will get:
onDrag
DraggableBox render box2
XarrowProvider
xarrow
Note
currently, this is working as expected.
Update
after many hours of testing, this seems to work perfectly fine. I manage my own object that remember the update function for each Xwrapper instance, and this breaks the dependency between the 2 contexts. I will leave this post in case someone else will also come across this issue.
Update (bad one)
this architecture breaks on react-trees with <React.StrictMode>...</React.StrictMode> :cry:
any idea why? any other ideas ?

just in case someone would need something similar: here's a version that will work even with react strictmode(basically being rellyed of effect which called once and not renders):
import React, { FC, useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';
export const XelemContext = React.createContext(null as () => void);
export const XarrowContext = React.createContext(null as () => void);
// will hold a object of ids:references to updateXarrow functions of different Xwrapper instances over time
const updateRef = {};
let updateRefCount = 0;
const XarrowProvider: FC<{ instanceCount: React.MutableRefObject<number> }> = ({ children, instanceCount }) => {
const [, setRender] = useState({});
const updateXarrow = () => setRender({});
useEffect(() => {
instanceCount.current = updateRefCount; // so this instance would know what is id
updateRef[instanceCount.current] = updateXarrow;
}, []);
// log('XarrowProvider', updateRefCount);
return <XarrowContext.Provider value={updateXarrow}>{children}</XarrowContext.Provider>;
};
// renders only once and should always provide the right update function
const XelemProvider = ({ children, instanceCount }) => {
return <XelemContext.Provider value={updateRef[instanceCount.current]}>{children}</XelemContext.Provider>;
};
const Xwrapper = ({ children }) => {
console.log('wrapper here!');
const instanceCount = useRef(updateRefCount);
const [, setRender] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
updateRefCount++;
setRender({});
return () => {
delete updateRef[instanceCount.current];
};
}, []);
return (
<XelemProvider instanceCount={instanceCount}>
<XarrowProvider instanceCount={instanceCount}>{children}</XarrowProvider>
</XelemProvider>
);
};
export default Xwrapper;

How to call a react hook fetch request in a functional component to access data then pass to a class component to map?

After a huge amount of trial and error for a complex webGL project I have landed on a solution that will reduce the amount of re-engineering working, threejs code (from another developer) and, as this project is extremely time restrained, reduce the amount of time needed. It's also worth noting my experience of this is limited and I am the only developer left on the team.
The project current accepts a large array of random user data, which is exported from a js file and then consumed here...
import Users from "./data/data-users";
class UsersManager {
constructor() {
this.mapUserCountries = {};
}
init() {
Users.forEach(user => {
const c = user.country;
if (!this.mapUserCountries[c])
this.mapUserCountries[c] = { nbUsers: 0, users: [] };
this.mapUserCountries[c].nbUsers++;
this.mapUserCountries[c].users.push(user);
});
}
getUsersPerCountry(country) {
return this.mapUserCountries[country];
}
}
export default new UsersManager();
Here is my fetch request..
import { useState, useEffect } from "react";
const FetchUsers = () => {
const [hasError, setErrors] = useState(false);
const [users, setUsers] = useState({});
async function fetchData() {
const res = await fetch(
"https://swapi.co/api/planets/4/"
);
res
.json()
.then(res => setUsers(res))
.catch(err => setErrors(err));
}
useEffect(() => {
fetchData();
}, []);
return JSON.stringify(users);
};
export default FetchUsers;
I have run into lots of issues as the UserManager is a class component and if I import my fetchUsers into this file, call it and save it to a variable like so const Users = fetchUsers(); it violates hooks.
I want to be able to return a function that will return my users from the database as an array.
That will then be able to be passed into the UserManager in the same way the hard coded data is and mapped over to be actioned by LOTS of other files.
I've mocked up a small codesandbox with what the flow would be ideally but I know I need a solution outside of hooks...
https://codesandbox.io/s/funny-borg-u2yl6
thanks
--- EDIT ---
import usersP from "./data/data-users";
class UsersManager {
constructor() {
this.mapUserCountries = {};
this.state = {
users: undefined
};
}
init() {
usersP.then(users => {
this.setState({ users });
});
console.log(usersP);
this.state.users.forEach(user => {
const c = user.country;
if (!this.mapUserCountries[c])
this.mapUserCountries[c] = { nbUsers: 0, users: [] };
this.mapUserCountries[c].nbUsers++;
this.mapUserCountries[c].users.push(user);
});
}
getUsersPerCountry(country) {
return this.mapUserCountries[country];
}
}
export default new UsersManager();
console.log (UsersManager.js:16 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'forEach' of undefined
at UsersManager.init (UsersManager.js:16)
at Loader.SceneApp.onLoadingComplete [as callback] (App.js:39)
at Loader.onAssetLoaded (index.js:20)
at index.js:36
at three.module.js:36226
at HTMLImageElement.onImageLoad)

I fixed your sandbox example.
You cannot load the users synchronously (using import) as you need to make a http call to fetch the users so it's asynchronous.
As a result you can fetch the users inside the componentDidMount lifecycle method and use a state variable to store them once they are fetched

There are a couple guidelines that will help separate functions that are Hooks and functions that are Components (these are true most of the time):
1 Component functions use pascal case (start with a capital letter) and always return JSX.
2 Custom Hooks functions conventionally begin with the word "use" and never return JSX.
In your case you probably want to make a custom Hooks function that must be called in a component;
function useUserData() {
const [hasError, setErrors] = useState(false);
const [users, setUsers] = useState({});
const networkCall = useCallback(async fetchData = () => {
const res = await fetch(
"https://swapi.co/api/planets/4/"
);
res
.json()
.then(res => setUsers(res))
.catch(err => setErrors(err));
} , [])
useEffect(() => {
fetchData();
}, []);
return {users, hasError};
}
Then call that custom hook in one of your components:
function App() {
const {users, hasError} = useUserData();
return (
<div className="App">
<h1>Hello CodeSandbox</h1>
<div>{users}</div>
<h2>Start editing to see some magic happen!</h2>
</div>
);
}
}
If you then need to share that fetched data throughout your app, you can pass it down via props or the context API: https://reactjs.org/docs/context.html
(post a message if you'd like an example of this).

How to convert functional component using hooks to class component

I'm trying to challenge myself to convert my course project that uses hooks into the same project but without having to use hooks in order to learn more about how to do things with class components. Currently, I need help figuring out how to replicate the useCallback hook within a normal class component. Here is how it is used in the app.
export const useMovieFetch = movieId => {
const [state, setState] = useState({});
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
const [error, setError] = useState(false);
const fetchData = useCallback(async () => {
setError(false);
setLoading(true);
try{
const endpoint = `${API_URL}movie/${movieId}?api_key=${API_KEY}`;
const result = await(await fetch(endpoint)).json();
const creditsEndpoint = `${API_URL}movie/${movieId}/credits?api_key=${API_KEY}`;
const creditsResult = await (await fetch(creditsEndpoint)).json();
const directors = creditsResult.crew.filter(member => member.job === 'Director');
setState({
...result,
actors: creditsResult.cast,
directors
});
}catch(error){
setError(true);
console.log(error);
}
setLoading(false);
}, [movieId])
useEffect(() => {
if(localStorage[movieId]){
// console.log("grabbing from localStorage");
setState(JSON.parse(localStorage[movieId]));
setLoading(false);
}else{
// console.log("Grabbing from API");
fetchData();
}
}, [fetchData, movieId])
useEffect(() => {
localStorage.setItem(movieId, JSON.stringify(state));
}, [movieId, state])
return [state, loading, error]
}
I understand how to replicate other hooks such as useState and useEffect but I'm struggling to find the answer for the alternative to useCallback. Thank you for any effort put into this question.

TL;DR
In your specific example useCallback is used to generate a referentially-maintained property to pass along to another component as a prop. You do that by just creating a bound method (you don't have to worry about dependencies like you do with hooks, because all the dependencies are maintained on your instance as props or state.
class Movie extends Component {
constructor() {
this.state = {
loading:true,
error:false,
}
}
fetchMovie() {
this.setState({error:false,loading:true});
try {
// await fetch
this.setState({
...
})
} catch(error) {
this.setState({error});
}
}
fetchMovieProp = this.fetchMovie.bind(this); //<- this line is essentially "useCallback" for a class component
render() {
return <SomeOtherComponent fetchMovie={this.fetchMovieProp}/>
}
}
A bit more about hooks on functional vs class components
The beautiful thing about useCallback is, to implement it on a class component, just declare an instance property that is a function (bound to the instance) and you're done.
The purpose of useCallback is referential integrity so, basically, your React.memo's and React.PureComponent's will work properly.
const MyComponent = () => {
const myCallback = () => { ... do something };
return <SomeOtherComponent myCallback={myCallback}/> // every time `MyComponent` renders it will pass a new prop called `myCallback` to `SomeOtherComponent`
}
const MyComponent = () => {
const myCallback = useCallback(() => { ... do something },[...dependencies]);
return <SomeOtherComponent myCallback={myCallback}/> // every time `MyComponent` renders it will pass THE SAME callback to `SomeOtherComponent` UNLESS one of the dependencies changed
}
To replicate useCallback in class components you don't have to do anything:
class MyComponent extends Component {
method() { ... do something }
myCallback = this.method.bind(this); <- this is essentially `useCallback`
render() {
return <SomeOtherComponent myCallback={this.myCallback}/> // same referential integrity as `useCallback`
}
}
THE BIG ONE LINER
You'll find that hooks in react are just a mechanism to create instance variables (hint: the "instance" is a Fiber) when all you have is a function.

You can replicate the behavior ofuseCallback by using a memorized function for the given input(eg: movieId)
You can use lodash method
for more in-depth understanding check here

Return component data using switch and Hooks

I'm trying to do a switch inside a function and i'm use react hooks.
The switch works fine but i cannot return a component..why?
The idea is that as I go through the array i will load the corresponding component whit all his data at that moment.
export default function Content({content}) {
const [contentBooks, setContentBooks] = useState(null);
const [contentFilms, setContentFilms] = useState(null);
async function data() {
return await Promise.all(content.map(element => element.content).map(async item => {
if (item.type == 'DETAIL') {
switch (item.type) {
case 'BOOKS':
const bookstype = await axios.get(`url`)
setContentBooks(bookstype)
return <Componen1 info={contentBooks} // --> not work
case 'FILMS':
const filmstype = await axios.get(``)
setContentFilms(filmstype)
return <Componen2 info={contentFilms} // --> not work
default:
return null;
}
}
}))
}
useEffect(() => {
const fetchData = async () => {
const result = await data()
};
fetchData();
}, [content]);
return (
<React.Fragment></React.Fragment>
)
}

You probably need this resource: https://www.robinwieruch.de/react-pass-props-to-component/
I don't think that is the correct way of calling a component in react

there is alot wrong with this. first your components have no closing tag not sure how this even compiles.
<Componen2 info={contentFilms}/>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.4.0/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.4.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
next you are going an extremely round about way of calling the component.
load it once, not in the useeffect.