We Keep Coding

Javascript: using ternary operator to return default value if a function returns undefined [duplicate]

I know that I can test for a JavaScript variable and then define it if it is undefined, but is there not some way of saying
var setVariable = localStorage.getItem('value') || 0;
seems like a much clearer way, and I'm pretty sure I've seen this in other languages.

Yes, it can do that, but strictly speaking that will assign the default value if the retrieved value is falsey, as opposed to truly undefined. It would therefore not only match undefined but also null, false, 0, NaN, "" (but not "0").
If you want to set to default only if the variable is strictly undefined then the safest way is to write:
var x = (typeof x === 'undefined') ? your_default_value : x;
On newer browsers it's actually safe to write:
var x = (x === undefined) ? your_default_value : x;
but be aware that it is possible to subvert this on older browsers where it was permitted to declare a variable named undefined that has a defined value, causing the test to fail.

Logical nullish assignment, ES2020+ solution
New operators are currently being added to the browsers, ??=, ||=, and &&=. This post will focus on ??=.
This checks if left side is undefined or null, short-circuiting if already defined. If not, the right-side is assigned to the left-side variable.
Comparing Methods
// Using ??=
name ??= "Dave"
// Previously, ES2020
name = name ?? "Dave"
// or
if (typeof name === "undefined" || name === null) {
name = true
}
// Before that (not equivalent, but commonly used)
name = name || "Dave" // Now: name ||= "Dave"
Basic Examples
let a // undefined
let b = null
let c = false
a ??= true // true
b ??= true // true
c ??= true // false
Object/Array Examples
let x = ["foo"]
let y = { foo: "fizz" }
x[0] ??= "bar" // "foo"
x[1] ??= "bar" // "bar"
y.foo ??= "buzz" // "fizz"
y.bar ??= "buzz" // "buzz"
x // Array [ "foo", "bar" ]
y // Object { foo: "fizz", bar: "buzz" }
??= Browser Support Oct 2022 - 93%
??= Mozilla Documentation
||= Mozilla Documentation
&&= Mozilla Documentation

The 2018 ES6 answer is:
return Object.is(x, undefined) ? y : x;
If variable x is undefined, return variable y... otherwise if variable x is defined, return variable x.

ES2020 Answer
With the Nullish Coalescing Operator, you can set a default value if value is null or undefined.
const setVariable = localStorage.getItem('value') ?? 0;
However, you should be aware that the nullish coalescing operator does not return the default value for other types of falsy value such as 0 and ''.
However, do take note of the browser support. You may need to use a JavaScript compiler like Babel to convert it into something more backward compatible. If you are using Node.js, it has been supported since version 14.

I needed to "set a variable if undefined" in several places. I created a function using #Alnitak answer. Hopefully it helps someone.
function setDefaultVal(value, defaultValue){
return (value === undefined) ? defaultValue : value;
}
Usage:
hasPoints = setDefaultVal(this.hasPoints, true);

It seems more logical to check typeof instead of undefined? I assume you expect a number as you set the var to 0 when undefined:
var getVariable = localStorage.getItem('value');
var setVariable = (typeof getVariable == 'number') ? getVariable : 0;
In this case if getVariable is not a number (string, object, whatever), setVariable is set to 0

In our days you actually can do your approach with JS:
// Your variable is null
// or '', 0, false, undefined
let x = null;
// Set default value
x = x || 'default value';
console.log(x); // default value
So your example WILL work:
const setVariable = localStorage.getItem('value') || 0;

You can use any of below ways.
let x;
let y = 4;
x || (x = y)
in ES12 or after
let x;
let y = 4;
x ||= y;

If you're a FP (functional programming) fan, Ramda has a neat helper function for this called defaultTo :
usage:
const result = defaultTo(30)(value)
It's more useful when dealing with undefined boolean values:
const result2 = defaultTo(false)(dashboard.someValue)

var setVariable = (typeof localStorage.getItem('value') !== 'undefined' && localStorage.getItem('value')) || 0;

Ran into this scenario today as well where I didn't want zero to be overwritten for several values. We have a file with some common utility methods for scenarios like this. Here's what I added to handle the scenario and be flexible.
function getIfNotSet(value, newValue, overwriteNull, overwriteZero) {
if (typeof (value) === 'undefined') {
return newValue;
} else if (value === null && overwriteNull === true) {
return newValue;
} else if (value === 0 && overwriteZero === true) {
return newValue;
} else {
return value;
}
}
It can then be called with the last two parameters being optional if I want to only set for undefined values or also overwrite null or 0 values. Here's an example of a call to it that will set the ID to -1 if the ID is undefined or null, but wont overwrite a 0 value.
data.ID = Util.getIfNotSet(data.ID, -1, true);

Works even if the default value is a boolean value:
var setVariable = ( (b = 0) => b )( localStorage.getItem('value') );

It seems to me, that for current javascript implementations,
var [result='default']=[possiblyUndefinedValue]
is a nice way to do this (using object deconstruction).

Where can I use the '??' operator? [duplicate]

This question already has an answer here:
Why is optional chaining not working in my Node REPL? [duplicate]
(1 answer)
Closed 1 year ago.
In a JavaScript tutorial I saw someone using the ?? operator over a short circuit operator i.e. ||
For Example:
const a = null;
const b = a ?? 0
Which essentially meant use the value of a and if a is null or undefined use a default value of 0.
But somehow in NodeJS, this results in a syntax error:

?? Called Nullish coalescing operator in Javascript.
const foo = null ?? 'default string';
console.log(foo);
// expected output: "default string"
const baz = 0 ?? 42;
console.log(baz);
// expected output: 0
console.log(null ?? null)
// expected output: null
|| this operator not return 0, false, null, "" and undefined.
Ex. a = 0; b = 10; console.log(a || b); it return 10(b).
If first value is NULL then it return second value.
Note: if second value also NULL then it return null

Binary conditional operator with assignment [duplicate]

Is there a null coalescing operator in Javascript?
For example, in C#, I can do this:
String someString = null;
var whatIWant = someString ?? "Cookies!";
The best approximation I can figure out for Javascript is using the conditional operator:
var someString = null;
var whatIWant = someString ? someString : 'Cookies!';
Which is sorta icky IMHO. Can I do better?

Update
JavaScript now supports the nullish coalescing operator (??). It returns its right-hand-side operand when its left-hand-side operand is null or undefined, and otherwise returns its left-hand-side operand.
Old Answer
Please check compatibility before using it.
The JavaScript equivalent of the C# null coalescing operator (??) is using a logical OR (||):
var whatIWant = someString || "Cookies!";
There are cases (clarified below) that the behaviour won't match that of C#, but this is the general, terse way of assigning default/alternative values in JavaScript.
Clarification
Regardless of the type of the first operand, if casting it to a Boolean results in false, the assignment will use the second operand. Beware of all the cases below:
alert(Boolean(null)); // false
alert(Boolean(undefined)); // false
alert(Boolean(0)); // false
alert(Boolean("")); // false
alert(Boolean("false")); // true -- gotcha! :)
This means:
var whatIWant = null || new ShinyObject(); // is a new shiny object
var whatIWant = undefined || "well defined"; // is "well defined"
var whatIWant = 0 || 42; // is 42
var whatIWant = "" || "a million bucks"; // is "a million bucks"
var whatIWant = "false" || "no way"; // is "false"

function coalesce() {
var len = arguments.length;
for (var i=0; i<len; i++) {
if (arguments[i] !== null && arguments[i] !== undefined) {
return arguments[i];
}
}
return null;
}
var xyz = {};
xyz.val = coalesce(null, undefined, xyz.val, 5);
// xyz.val now contains 5
this solution works like the SQL coalesce function, it accepts any number of arguments, and returns null if none of them have a value. It behaves like the C# ?? operator in the sense that "", false, and 0 are considered NOT NULL and therefore count as actual values. If you come from a .net background, this will be the most natural feeling solution.

Yes, it is coming soon. See proposal here and implementation status here.
It looks like this:
x ?? y
Example
const response = {
settings: {
nullValue: null,
height: 400,
animationDuration: 0,
headerText: '',
showSplashScreen: false
}
};
const undefinedValue = response.settings?.undefinedValue ?? 'some other default'; // result: 'some other default'
const nullValue = response.settings?.nullValue ?? 'some other default'; // result: 'some other default'
const headerText = response.settings?.headerText ?? 'Hello, world!'; // result: ''
const animationDuration = response.settings?.animationDuration ?? 300; // result: 0
const showSplashScreen = response.settings?.showSplashScreen ?? true; // result: false

If || as a replacement of C#'s ?? isn't good enough in your case, because it swallows empty strings and zeros, you can always write your own function:
function $N(value, ifnull) {
if (value === null || value === undefined)
return ifnull;
return value;
}
var whatIWant = $N(someString, 'Cookies!');

Nobody has mentioned in here the potential for NaN, which--to me--is also a null-ish value. So, I thought I'd add my two-cents.
For the given code:
var a,
b = null,
c = parseInt('Not a number'),
d = 0,
e = '',
f = 1
;
If you were to use the || operator, you get the first non-false value:
var result = a || b || c || d || e || f; // result === 1
If you use the new ?? (null coalescing) operator, you will get c, which has the value: NaN
vas result = a ?? b ?? c ?? d ?? e ?? f; // result === NaN
Neither of these seem right to me. In my own little world of coalesce logic, which may differ from your world, I consider undefined, null, and NaN as all being "null-ish". So, I would expect to get back d (zero) from the coalesce method.
If anyone's brain works like mine, and you want to exclude NaN, then this custom coalesce method (unlike the one posted here) will accomplish that:
function coalesce() {
var i, undefined, arg;
for( i=0; i < arguments.length; i++ ) {
arg = arguments[i];
if( arg !== null && arg !== undefined
&& (typeof arg !== 'number' || arg.toString() !== 'NaN') ) {
return arg;
}
}
return null;
}
For those who want the code as short as possible, and don't mind a little lack of clarity, you can also use this as suggested by #impinball. This takes advantage of the fact that NaN is never equal to NaN. You can read up more on that here: Why is NaN not equal to NaN?
function coalesce() {
var i, arg;
for( i=0; i < arguments.length; i++ ) {
arg = arguments[i];
if( arg != null && arg === arg ) { //arg === arg is false for NaN
return arg;
}
}
return null;
}

Logical nullish assignment, 2020+ solution
A new operator is currently being added to the browsers, ??=. This combines the null coalescing operator ?? with the assignment operator =.
NOTE: This is not common in public browser versions yet. Will update as availability changes.
??= checks if the variable is undefined or null, short-circuiting if already defined. If not, the right-side value is assigned to the variable.
Basic Examples
let a // undefined
let b = null
let c = false
a ??= true // true
b ??= true // true
c ??= true // false
Object/Array Examples
let x = ["foo"]
let y = { foo: "fizz" }
x[0] ??= "bar" // "foo"
x[1] ??= "bar" // "bar"
y.foo ??= "buzz" // "fizz"
y.bar ??= "buzz" // "buzz"
x // Array [ "foo", "bar" ]
y // Object { foo: "fizz", bar: "buzz" }
Browser Support Jan '22 - 89%
Mozilla Documentation

Yes, and its proposal is Stage 4 now. This means that the proposal is ready for inclusion in the formal ECMAScript standard. You can already use it in recent desktop versions of Chrome, Edge and Firefox, but we will have to wait for a bit longer until this feature reaches cross-browser stability.
Have a look at the following example to demonstrate its behavior:
// note: this will work only if you're running latest versions of aforementioned browsers
const var1 = undefined;
const var2 = "fallback value";
const result = var1 ?? var2;
console.log(`Nullish coalescing results in: ${result}`);
Previous example is equivalent to:
const var1 = undefined;
const var2 = "fallback value";
const result = (var1 !== null && var1 !== undefined) ?
var1 :
var2;
console.log(`Nullish coalescing results in: ${result}`);
Note that nullish coalescing will not threat falsy values the way the || operator did (it only checks for undefined or null values), hence the following snippet will act as follows:
// note: this will work only if you're running latest versions of aforementioned browsers
const var1 = ""; // empty string
const var2 = "fallback value";
const result = var1 ?? var2;
console.log(`Nullish coalescing results in: ${result}`);
For TypesScript users, starting off TypeScript 3.7, this feature is also available now.

?? vs || vs &&
None of the other answers compares all three of these. Since Justin Johnson's comment has so many votes, and since double question mark vs && in javascript was marked a duplicate of this one, it makes sense to include && in an answer.
First in words, inspired by Justin Johnson's comment:
|| returns the first "truey" value, else the last value whatever it is.
&& returns the first "falsey" value, else the last value whatever it is.
?? returns the first non-null, non-undefined value, else the last value, whatever it is.
Then, demonstrated in live code:
let F1,
F2 = null,
F3 = 0,
F4 = '',
F5 = parseInt('Not a number (NaN)'),
T1 = 3,
T2 = 8
console.log( F1 || F2 || F3 || F4 || F5 || T1 || T2 ) // 3 (T1)
console.log( F1 || F2 || F3 || F4 || F5 ) // NaN (F5)
console.log( T1 && T2 && F1 && F2 && F3 && F4 && F5 ) // undefined (F1)
console.log( T1 && T2 ) // 8 (T2)
console.log( F1 ?? F2 ?? F3 ?? F4 ?? F5 ?? T1 ) // 0 (F3)
console.log( F1 ?? F2) // null (F2)

After reading your clarification, #Ates Goral's answer provides how to perform the same operation you're doing in C# in JavaScript.
#Gumbo's answer provides the best way to check for null; however, it's important to note the difference in == versus === in JavaScript especially when it comes to issues of checking for undefined and/or null.
There's a really good article about the difference in two terms here. Basically, understand that if you use == instead of ===, JavaScript will try to coalesce the values you're comparing and return what the result of the comparison after this coalescence.

beware of the JavaScript specific definition of null. there are two definitions for "no value" in javascript.
1. Null: when a variable is null, it means it contains no data in it, but the variable is already defined in the code. like this:
var myEmptyValue = 1;
myEmptyValue = null;
if ( myEmptyValue === null ) { window.alert('it is null'); }
// alerts
in such case, the type of your variable is actually Object. test it.
window.alert(typeof myEmptyValue); // prints Object
Undefined: when a variable has not been defined before in the code, and as expected, it does not contain any value. like this:
if ( myUndefinedValue === undefined ) { window.alert('it is undefined'); }
// alerts
if such case, the type of your variable is 'undefined'.
notice that if you use the type-converting comparison operator (==), JavaScript will act equally for both of these empty-values. to distinguish between them, always use the type-strict comparison operator (===).

Note that React's create-react-app tool-chain supports the null-coalescing since version 3.3.0 (released 5.12.2019). From the release notes:
Optional Chaining and Nullish Coalescing Operators
We now support the optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators!
// Optional chaining
a?.(); // undefined if `a` is null/undefined
b?.c; // undefined if `b` is null/undefined
// Nullish coalescing
undefined ?? 'some other default'; // result: 'some other default'
null ?? 'some other default'; // result: 'some other default'
'' ?? 'some other default'; // result: ''
0 ?? 300; // result: 0
false ?? true; // result: false
This said, in case you use create-react-app 3.3.0+ you can start using the null-coalesce operator already today in your React apps.

There are two items here:
Logical OR
const foo = '' || 'default string';
console.log(foo); // output is 'default string'
Nullish coalescing operator
const foo = '' ?? 'default string';
console.log(foo); // output is empty string i.e. ''
The nullish coalescing operator (??) is a logical operator that returns its right-hand side operand when its left-hand side operand is null or undefined, and otherwise returns its left-hand side operand.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Nullish_coalescing_operator

It will hopefully be available soon in Javascript, as it is in proposal phase as of Apr, 2020. You can monitor the status here for compatibility and support - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Nullish_coalescing_operator
For people using Typescript, you can use the nullish coalescing operator from Typescript 3.7
From the docs -
You can think of this feature - the ?? operator - as a way to “fall
back” to a default value when dealing with null or undefined. When we
write code like
let x = foo ?? bar();
this is a new way to say that the value foo will be used when it’s “present”; but when it’s null or undefined,
calculate bar() in its place.

Need to support old browser and have a object hierarchy
body.head.eyes[0] //body, head, eyes may be null
may use this,
(((body||{}) .head||{}) .eyes||[])[0] ||'left eye'

ECMAScript 2021 enabled two new features:
Nullish coalescing operator (??) which is a logical operator that returns its right-hand side operand when its left-hand side operand is either null or undefined, and otherwise returns its left-hand side operand.
let b = undefined ?? 5;
console.log(b); // 5
Logical nullish assignment (x ??= y) operator which only assigns if x has a nullish value (null or undefined).
const car = {speed : 20};
car.speed ??= 5;
console.log(car.speed);
car.name ??= "reno";
console.log(car.name);
More about Logical nullish assignment can be found here https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Logical_nullish_assignment
More about Nullish coalescing operator can be found here
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Nullish_coalescing_operator

Now it has full support in latest version of major browsers like Chrome, Edge, Firefox , Safari etc. Here's the comparison between the null operator and Nullish Coalescing Operator
const response = {
settings: {
nullValue: null,
height: 400,
animationDuration: 0,
headerText: '',
showSplashScreen: false
}
};
/* OR Operator */
const undefinedValue = response.settings.undefinedValue || 'Default Value'; // 'Default Value'
const nullValue = response.settings.nullValue || 'Default Value'; // 'Default Value'
const headerText = response.settings.headerText || 'Hello, world!'; // 'Hello, world!'
const animationDuration = response.settings.animationDuration || 300; // 300
const showSplashScreen = response.settings.showSplashScreen || true; // true
/* Nullish Coalescing Operator */
const undefinedValue = response.settings.undefinedValue ?? 'Default Value'; // 'Default Value'
const nullValue = response.settings.nullValue ?? ''Default Value'; // 'Default Value'
const headerText = response.settings.headerText ?? 'Hello, world!'; // ''
const animationDuration = response.settings.animationDuration ?? 300; // 0
const showSplashScreen = response.settings.showSplashScreen ?? true; // false

Those who are using Babel, need to upgrade to the latest version to use nullish coalescing (??):
Babel 7.8.0 supports the new ECMAScript 2020 features by default: you
don't need to enable individual plugins for nullish coalescing (??),
optional chaining (?.) and dynamic import() anymore with preset-env
From https://babeljs.io/blog/2020/01/11/7.8.0

Chain multiple values / several values
"short circuit" is enabled: do not evaluate any further if one of the first values is valid
that means order matters, the most left values are prioritized
const value = first ?? second ?? third ?? "default";

I was trying to check if an input is null and then use the value accordingly. This is my code.
let valueToBeConsidered = !inputValue ? "trueCondition" : "falseCondition",
So if inputValue is null then valueToBeConsidered = falseCondition and if inputValue has a value then valueToBeConsidered = trueCondition

Oracle NVL function equivalent in JavaScript/jQuery

Is there an Oracle NVL function equivalent in JavaScript/jQuery. I would be interested to see an example of how it works.

In Javascript this can actually be handled by the || operator, that returns the first "valid" value.
var a = null;
var b = "valid value";
var c = a || b; // c == "valid value"
Just keep in mind that "falsy" values are not only null but also for example empty string '', number 0 and boolean value false. So you need to be sure that either you consider those with the same meaning as null or your variables cannot assume those values, because in those cases you will also get the second value selected:
var a = "";
var b = "valid value";
var c = a || b; // c == "valid value"

Ternary operator typically is used here.
For example, if you're creating a dynamic action in Apex you can do something like this:
( $v("P1_VAL1") ? $v("P1_VAL1") : $v("P1_VAL2") )
This will return the value of P1_VAL1 if it's not blank, otherwise it will return the value of P1_VAL2.

Nullish coalescing operator (??)
The nullish coalescing operator (??) is a logical operator that returns its right-hand side operand when its left-hand side operand is null or undefined, and otherwise returns its left-hand side operand.
var foo = null ?? 'default string';
console.log(foo);
// expected output: "default string"
var baz = 0 ?? 42;
console.log(baz);
// expected output: 0

function nvl(value1,value2){
if (value1 == null)
return value2;
return value1;
}

Replace a value if null or undefined in JavaScript

I have a requirement to apply the ?? C# operator to JavaScript and I don't know how.
Consider this in C#:
int i?=null;
int j=i ?? 10;//j is now 10
Now I have this set up in JavaScript:
var options={
filters:{
firstName:'abc'
}
};
var filter=options.filters[0]||'';//should get 'abc' here, it doesn't happen
var filter2=options.filters[1]||'';//should get empty string here, because there is only one filter
How do I do it correctly?
Thanks.
EDIT: I spotted half of the problem: I can't use the 'indexer' notation to objects (my_object[0]). Is there a way to bypass it? (I don't know the names of the filters properties beforehand and don't want to iterate over them).

Here’s the JavaScript equivalent:
var i = null;
var j = i || 10; //j is now 10
Note that the logical operator || does not return a boolean value but the first value that can be converted to true.
Additionally use an array of objects instead of one single object:
var options = {
filters: [
{
name: 'firstName',
value: 'abc'
}
]
};
var filter = options.filters[0] || ''; // is {name:'firstName', value:'abc'}
var filter2 = options.filters[1] || ''; // is ''
That can be accessed by index.

ES2020 Answer
The new Nullish Coalescing Operator, is finally available on JavaScript. However, do take note of the browser support. You may need to use a JavaScript compiler like Babel to convert it into something more backward compatible.
According to the documentation,
The nullish coalescing operator (??) is a logical operator that
returns its right-hand side operand when its left-hand side operand is
null or undefined, and otherwise returns its left-hand side operand.
const options={
filters:{
firstName:'abc'
}
};
const filter = options.filters[0] ?? '';
const filter2 = options.filters[1] ?? '';
This will ensure that both of your variables will have a fallback value of '' if filters[0] or filters[1] are null, or undefined.
Do take note that the nullish coalescing operator does not return the default value for other types of falsy value such as 0 and ''. If you wish to account for all falsy values, you should be using the OR operator ||.

Logical nullish assignment, 2020+ solution
A new operator has been added, ??=. This is equivalent to value = value ?? defaultValue.
||= and &&= are similar, links below.
This checks if left side is undefined or null, short-circuiting if already defined. If not, the left side is assigned the right-side value.
Basic Examples
let a // undefined
let b = null
let c = false
a ??= true // true
b ??= true // true
c ??= true // false
// Equivalent to
a = a ?? true
Object/Array Examples
let x = ["foo"]
let y = { foo: "fizz" }
x[0] ??= "bar" // "foo"
x[1] ??= "bar" // "bar"
y.foo ??= "buzz" // "fizz"
y.bar ??= "buzz" // "buzz"
x // Array [ "foo", "bar" ]
y // Object { foo: "fizz", bar: "buzz" }
Functional Example
function config(options) {
options.duration ??= 100
options.speed ??= 25
return options
}
config({ duration: 555 }) // { duration: 555, speed: 25 }
config({}) // { duration: 100, speed: 25 }
config({ duration: null }) // { duration: 100, speed: 25 }
??= Browser Support Sept 2021 - 90%
??= Mozilla Documentation
||= Mozilla Documentation
&&= Mozilla Documentation

TLDR:
int j=i ?? 10; is perfectly fine to use in javascript also. Just replace int with let.
?? vs ||
?? should be preferred to || because it checks only for nulls and undefined.
All The expressions below are true:
(null || 'x') === 'x' ;
(undefined || 'x') === 'x' ;
//Most of the times you don't want the result below
('' || 'x') === 'x' ;
(0 || 'x') === 'x' ;
(false || 'x') === 'x' ;
//-----
//Using ?? is preferred
(null ?? 'x') === 'x' ;
(undefined ?? 'x') === 'x' ;
//?? works only for null and undefined, which is in general safer
('' ?? 'x') === '' ;
(0 ?? 'x') === 0 ;
(false ?? 'x') === false ;
Asterisk: Check browser compatibility and if you really need to support these other browsers use babel.

I spotted half of the problem: I can't use the 'indexer' notation to objects (my_object[0]). Is there a way to bypass it?
No; an object literal, as the name implies, is an object, and not an array, so you cannot simply retrieve a property based on an index, since there is no specific order of their properties. The only way to retrieve their values is by using the specific name:
var someVar = options.filters.firstName; //Returns 'abc'
Or by iterating over them using the for ... in loop:
for(var p in options.filters) {
var someVar = options.filters[p]; //Returns the property being iterated
}

Destructuring solution
Question content may have changed, so I'll try to answer thoroughly.
Destructuring allows you to pull values out of anything with properties. You can also define default values when null/undefined and name aliases.
const options = {
filters : {
firstName : "abc"
}
}
const {filters: {firstName = "John", lastName = "Smith"}} = options
// firstName = "abc"
// lastName = "Smith"
NOTE: Capitalization matters
If working with an array, here is how you do it.
In this case, name is extracted from each object in the array, and given its own alias. Since the object might not exist = {} was also added.
const options = {
filters: [{
name: "abc",
value: "lots"
}]
}
const {filters:[{name : filter1 = "John"} = {}, {name : filter2 = "Smith"} = {}]} = options
// filter1 = "abc"
// filter2 = "Smith"
More Detailed Tutorial
Browser Support 92% July 2020