We Keep Coding

New Date() and New Date(string) not using the same timezone [duplicate]

When using new Date or Date.parse in JavaScript, I cannot just pass arbitrary date formats. Depending on the format, I get a different date than I wanted to or even Invalid Date instead of a date object. Some date formats work in one browser but not in others. So which date time formats should I use?
Additional questions:
Do all browsers support the same formats? How do Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, and Apple Safari handle date time strings? What about Node.js?
Does it take the local date format into consideration? E.g. if I live in Switzerland and the date format is 30.07.2018, can I use new Date('30.07.2018')?
Does it take the local time zone into consideration?
How can I get a date time string from a date object?
How can I detect invalid date time strings?
How do date libraries like Moment.js handle date strings?
In case you did not notice, I answered my own question (why?).

The Essentials
JavaScript officially supports a simplification of the ISO 8601 Extended Format. The format is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ. The letter T is the date/time separator and Z is the time zone offset specified as Z (for UTC) or either + or - followed by a time expression HH:mm.
Some parts (e.g. the time) of that format can be omitted.
Note that years must have at least four digits, month/day/hours/minutes/seconds must have exactly two digits, and milliseconds must have exactly three digits. For example, 99-1-1 is not a valid date string.
These are some examples of valid date (time) strings:
2018-12-30
2018-12-30T20:59
2018-12-30T20:59:00
2018-12-30T20:59:00.000Z
2018-12-30T20:59:00.000+01:00
2018-12-30T20:59:00.000-01:00
When you omit the time zone offset, date-times are interpreted as user local time.
When you omit the time altogether, dates are interpreted as UTC.
Important:
All modern and reasonably old browsers and implementations support the full-length date time format according to the specification.
However, there are differences in the handling of date (time) strings without a time zone (see "Missing Time Zone Offset" below for details). You should not use date time strings without a time zone (Status 2018).
Instead pass a unix timestamp in milliseconds or separate arguments for different parts of the date to the Date constructor.
Most browser also support some other formats but they are not specified and thus don't work in all browsers the same way.
If at all, you should only use the date time string formats explained above.
Every other format might break in other browsers or even in other versions of the same browser.
If you run into Invalid Date instead of a date object, you most probably are using an invalid date time string.
And now with a little more detail.
Date Time String Format
ECMAScript (the specification that the JavaScript language implements) has been supporting date strings in new Date (specification) and Date.parse (specification) since its inception.
However, the first versions did not actually specify a date time format.
This changed in 2009 when ES5 was introduced with a specification of a date time format.
The Basics
ECMAScript specifies the Date Time String Format as a simplification of the ISO 8601 Extended Format. The format is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ.
YYYY is the decimal digits of the year 0000 to 9999 in the proleptic Gregorian calendar.
- (hyphen) appears literally twice in the string.
MM is the month of the year from 01 (January) to 12 (December).
DD is the day of the month from 01 to 31.
T appears literally in the string, to indicate the beginning of the time element.
HH is the number of complete hours that have passed since midnight as two decimal digits from 00 to 24.
: (colon) appears literally twice in the string.
mm is the number of complete minutes since the start of the hour as two decimal digits from 00 to 59.
ss is the number of complete seconds since the start of the minute as two decimal digits from 00 to 59.
. (dot) appears literally in the string.
sss is the number of complete milliseconds since the start of the second as three decimal digits.
Z is the time zone offset specified as "Z" (for UTC) or either "+" or "-" followed by a time expression HH:mm
The specification also mentions that if "the String does not conform to [the specified] format the function may fall back to any implementation-specific heuristics or implementation-specific date formats" which might result in different dates in different browsers.
ECMAScript does not take any user local date time formats into account which means that you can not use country or region-specific date time formats.
Short Date (and Time) Forms
The specification also includes shorter formats as follows.
This format includes date-only forms:
YYYY
YYYY-MM
YYYY-MM-DD
It also includes “date-time” forms that consist of one of the above date-only forms immediately followed by one of the following time forms with an optional time zone offset appended:
THH:mm
THH:mm:ss
THH:mm:ss.sss
Fallback Values
[...] If the MM or DD fields are absent "01" is used as the value. If the HH, mm, or ss fields are absent "00" is used as the value and the value of an absent sss field is "000". When the time zone offset is absent, date-only forms are interpreted as a UTC time and date-time forms are interpreted as a local time.
See "Missing Time Zone Offset" below for more information on the lacking browser support.
Out of Bound Values
Illegal values (out-of-bounds as well as syntax errors) in a format string means that the format string is not a valid instance of this format.
For example, new Date('2018-01-32') and new Date('2018-02-29') will result in a Invalid Date.
Extended Years
The date time format of ECMAScript also specifies extended years which are six digit year values.
An example of such an extended year string format looks like +287396-10-12T08:59:00.992Z which denotes a date in the year 287396 A.D.
Extended years can either be positive or negative.
Date API
ECMAScript specifies a wide range of date object properties.
Given a valid date object, you can use Date.prototype.toISOString() to get a valid date time string.
Note that the time zone is always UTC.
new Date().toISOString() // "2018-08-05T20:19:50.905Z"
It is also possible to detect whether a date object valid or an Invalid Date using the following function.
function isValidDate(d) {
return d instanceof Date && !isNaN(d);
}
Source and more information can be found in Detecting an “invalid date” Date instance in JavaScript.
Examples
Valid Date Time Formats
The following date time formats are all valid according to the specification and should work in every browser, Node.js or other implementation that supports ES2016 or higher.
2018
2018-01
2018-01-01
2018-01-01T00:00
2018-01-01T00:00:00
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000+01:00
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000-01:00
+002018-01-01T00:00:00.000+01:00
Invalid Date Time Formats
Note that the following examples are invalid as per the specification.
However, that does not mean that no browser or other implementation interprets them to a date. Please do not use any of the date time formats below as they are non-standard and might fail in some browsers or browser versions.
2018-1-1 // month and date must be two digits
2018-01-01T0:0:0.0 // hour/minute/second must be two digits, millisecond must be three digits
2018-01-01 00:00 // whitespace must be "T" instead
2018-01-01T00 // shortest time part must have format HH:mm
2018-01-01T00:00:00.000+01 // time zone must have format HH:mm
Browser Support
Today, every modern and reasonably old browser supports the date time format that was introduced with the ES5 specification in 2009.
However, even today (Status 2018) there are different implementations for date time strings without a time zone (see "Missing Time Zone Offset" below).
If you need to support older browsers or use strings without a time zone, you should not use date time strings.
Instead, pass a number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC
or two or more arguments representing the different date parts to the Date constructor.
Missing Time Zone Offset
ES5.1 incorrectly states that the value of an absent time zone offset is “Z” which contradicts with ISO 8601.
This mistake was fixed in ES6 (ES2015) and extended on in ES2016 (see "Changes to the ECMAScript Specifications" below).
As of ES2016, date time strings without a time zone are parsed as local time while date only strings are parsed as UTC.
According to this answer, some implementations never implemented the behaviour specified in ES5.1.
One of them seems to be Mozilla Firefox.
Other browsers that seem to be compliant with the specification of ES2016 (and higher) are Google Chrome 65+, Microsoft Internet Explorer 11, and Microsoft Edge.
The current version of Apple Safari (11.1.2) is not compliant as it erroneously parses date time strings without a time zone (e.g. 2018-01-01T00:00) as UTC instead of local time.
Legacy Date Time Formats
ES5 introduced a specification for date time strings in 2009.
Before that, there were no specified formats that were supported by all browsers.
As a result, each browser vendor added support for different formats which often did not work accross different browsers (and versions).
For a small example of ancient history, see date-formats.
Most browsers still support those legacy formats in order to not break the backward compatibility of older websites.
But it is not safe to rely on those non-standard formats as they might be inconsistent or get removed at any time.
Date.prototype.toString() and Date.prototype.toUTCString()
ES2018 for the first time specified the date format that is returned by Date.prototype.toString() and Date.prototype.toUTCString().
Already before that, the ECMA Specification required the Date constructor and Date.parse to correctly parse the formats returned by those methods (even though it did not specify a format before 2018).
An example return value of Date.prototype.toString() may look like this:
Sun Feb 03 2019 14:27:49 GMT+0100 (Central European Standard Time)
Note that the timezone name within brackets is optional and the exact name is "implementation-dependent".
Date.prototype.toUTCString() returns a date in a similar format as Date.prototype.toString() but with a zero timezone offset. An example format may look like this:
Sun, 03 Feb 2019 13:27:49 GMT
Note that there is a comma , after the weekday and day month are reversed compared to Date.prototype.toString().
As those formats have only been specified in 2018, you should not rely on them working equally in different implementations (especially older browsers).
Node.js
Node.js is running on the V8 JavaScript engine which is also used in Google Chrome.
So the same specification regarding the date time string format applies.
As the code runs in the backend though, the user local time does not influence the time zones but only the settings on the server do.
Most platform as a service (PaaS) provider that host Node.js applications use UTC as their default time zone.
Date Time Libraries
Moment.js
Moment.js is a very popular library to help with the handling of dates in JavaScript and it also supports more formats than ECMAScript specifies.
In addition, Moment.js also supports creating date objects based on a string and a arbitrary format.
Luxon
Luxon supports parsing of ISO 8601, HTTP, RFC2822, SQL, and arbitrary formats. But only using different functions for different date time formats.
Changes to the ECMAScript Specifications
A list of notable changes in the ECMAScript specifications regarding date time string formats.
Changes in ES2018
Introduces a specification for the date formats returned by Date.prototype.toString() and Date.prototype.toUTCString().
Changes in ES2017
No notable changes.
Changes in ES2016
If the time zone offset is absent, the date-time is interpreted as a local time.
When the time zone offset is absent, date-only forms are interpreted as a UTC time and date-time forms are interpreted as a local time.
Changes in ES6 (ES2015)
The value of an absent time zone offset is “Z”.
If the time zone offset is absent, the date-time is interpreted as a local time.
From Corrections and Clarifications in ECMAScript 2015 with Possible Compatibility Impact:
If a time zone offset is not present, the local time zone is used. Edition 5.1 incorrectly stated that a missing time zone should be interpreted as "z".
See Date Time String Format: default time zone difference from ES5 not web-compatible for more details on that change.
Changes in ES5.1
If the MM or DD fields are absent “01” is used as the value. If the HH, mm, or ss fields are absent “00” is used as the value and the value of an absent sss field is “000”. The value of an absent time zone offset is “Z”.
Changes in ES5
First introduction of a date time string format to the ECMAScript specification.
ECMAScript defines a string interchange format for date-times based upon a simplification of the ISO 8601 Extended Format. The format is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ
Also introduces Date.prototype.toISOString() which returns a date time string in that specified format.
Changes in ES3
Deprecates Date.prototype.toGMTString() and replaces it with Date.parse(x.toUTCString()) in the section mentioning that the format returned by these methods must be correctly parseable by implmentations of Date.parse. Note that the format returned by Date.parse(x.toUTCString()) is "implementation-dependent".
Changes in ES2
No notable changes.
Initial Specification: ES1
ES1 introduced date time strings to be used in new Date(value) and Date.parse(value).
However, it did not specify an actual date (time) format, it even states that
[...] the value produced by Date.parse is implementation dependent [...]
The specification also mentions that
If x is any Date object [...], then all of the following expressions should produce the same numeric value in that implementation [...]:
[...]
Date.parse(x.toString())
Date.parse(x.toGMTString())
However, the returned value of both Date.prototype.toString() and Date.prototype.toGMTString() were specified as "implementation dependent".

So which date time formats should I use?
The general recommendation is to not use the built-in parser at all as it's unreliable, so the answer to "should" is "none". See Why does Date.parse give incorrect results?
However, as str says, you can likely use the format specified in ECMA-262 with a timezone: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ or YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sss±HH:mm, don't trust any other format.
Do all browser support the same formats?
No.
How do Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, and Apple Safari handle date time strings?
Differently. Anything other than the format in ECMA-262 is implementation dependent, and there are bugs in parsing the the ECMA-262 format.
What about Node.js?
Likely different again, see above.
Does it take the local date format into consideration? E.g. if I live in Switzerland and the date format is 30.07.2018, can I use new Date('30.07.2018')?
Maybe. Since it's not the standard format, parsing is implementation dependent, so maybe, maybe not.
Does it take the local time zone into consideration?
It uses the host timezone offset where the string is parsed as local and to generate the string displayed using local times. Otherwise it uses UTC (and the internal time value is UTC).
How can I get a date time string from a date object?
Date.parse.toString, or see Where can I find documentation on formatting a date in JavaScript?
How can I detect invalid date time strings?
One of the first 3 answers here should answer that.
How do date libraries like Moment.js handle date strings?
They parse them based on either a default or provided format. Read the source (e.g. fecha.js is a simple parser and formatter with well written, easy to follow code).
A parser isn't hard to write, but trying to guess the input format (as built-in parsers tend to do) is fraught, unreliable and inconsistent across implementations. So the parser should require the format to be provided unless the input string is in the parser's default format.
PS
There are changes to the formats of strings that implementations must support for parsing and formatting in ECMAScript 2019 (currently in draft), but I think the general advice to avoid the built–in parser will stand for some time yet.

Date.parse not working [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Why does Date.parse give incorrect results?
(11 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
In javascript I tried this
new Date(Date.parse("2016-12-15"));
And it outputs a date object but with the date as Wed Dec 14 19:00:00 EST 2016. Why is it dec 14 when I expect it as dec 15?
Thanks

JavaScript dates don't contain a time zone. The date you are parsing is interpreted as December 15, 2016 at midnight UTC.
When you are converting it back to a string, it uses the time zone from your browser locale, and since you appear to be on the american east coast, the appropriate time zone is EST.
7pm EST equals midnight the next day in UTC.

Parse is not a reliable way to parse your date...
Differences in assumed time zone
Given a date string of "March 7, 2014", parse() assumes a local time
zone, but given an ISO format such as "2014-03-07" it will assume a
time zone of UTC (ES5 and ECMAScript 2015). Therefore Date objects
produced using those strings may represent different moments in time
depending on the version of ECMAScript supported unless the system is
set with a local time zone of UTC. This means that two date strings
that appear equivalent may result in two different values depending on
the format of the string that is being converted.
-- Source --
I think you should get the client date with its timezone and use a library like Moment.js to parse the date correctly.

You can create a date object from a specific UTC time using .Date.UTC() method, but then you have to pass the values individually:
new Date(Date.UTC(year, month, day, hour, minute, second));
A better and safer approach would be to use moment.js

Can you freely convert dates between timezones?

If given a date in UTC (let's say) is it possible to convert to various time zones taking DST into account?
I'm interested if JS can do this natively, without me having a list of time zones and their offset.
Thanks.

A date (in Javascript and in most other systems) is not "in" a particular timezone. It measures the number of milliseconds between midnight, January 1, 1970 GMT, and "now".
Timezone only comes into play when you want to convert it to or from a human-readable format.

You can use the getTimezoneOffset method.

What's the difference between datetime in ISO 8601 and UTC formats in javascript?

I pick some date and time in javascript and then want to store it on server (.NET). Dates are supposed to be in future from the current moment (so they won't be before 1970).
Having read topics here on SO I learnt it's better to store date as a string and people suggest using Date.prototype.toISOString() or Date.prototype.toUTCString().
I've read that toISOString() is not available in IE 7. And I'd like to know other differences, when I should choose one or another function.

They're for different purposes.
UTC is the primary time standard by which the world regulates clocks and time.
ISO is standard format time. ISO also supports ms in its format.
So if you want to send data to the server, send the ISO, because ISO is the standard format:
var date = new Date();
sendDate(date.toISOString());
You can also use toISOString in IE7 polyfill.

I hope it will helpful to you.
Summary About toISOString() :-
The toISOString() method returns a string in ISO format (ISO 8601 Extended Format), which can be described as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ. The timezone is always UTC as denoted by the suffix "Z".
Refer Below link for more information about toISOString().
Date.prototype.toISOString()
Summary About toUTCString() :-
The toUTCString() method converts a date to a string, using the UTC time zone.
Refer Below link for more information about toUTCString()
Date.prototype.toUTCString()

Always use .toISOString()
They give almost the same information, but in different formats. Here is what I get on my machine.
new Date().toISOString()
"2019-10-11T18:56:08.984Z"
new Date().toUTCString()
"Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:56:08 GMT"
There are 4 reasons .toISOString() is more often what you want than .toUTCString().
A. More convenient sorting
When you sort alphabetically, the "2019-10-11T18:56:08.984Z" pattern of .toISOString() gives you the correct date order.
B. Millisecond precision
.toISOString() provides millisecond values, whereas .toUTCString() does not.
C. Any user can interpret correctly
The .toUTCString() value may be more familiar to human end-users, but only if the language settings are suitable for them. In contrast, the .toISOString() is the same regardless of language settings.
D. Reproducibly regeneratable by software
You can easily convert the ISO date string to a Javascript Date object, and then back again, regenerating exactly the same string. This is regardless of who gave you the ISO date string, where the server is, and where you are.
This is not automatically true for the UTC string. For example, if a second instance of your app system is running in a different time zone, or language, it's .toUTCstring() may use different numbers or words (respectively) to represent the same instant in time. It will be difficult for it to create a UTCString that matches what was made by the first instance of the app, since in general it will not know the language or timezone in which the first UTC string was produced.
I think nobody needs .toUTCString()
I don't know why `.toUTCString()` exists. Its word-heavy format makes it useless for internal storage of dates in your program, because it varies depending on your language and timezone setting etc.
So maybe it is to produce something nice to display externally for the user to see? Well, not really. Anyone who is not in the London time zone will not find it very helpful.
I live in London. And even I, even if I was writing an app purely for use by me, solely on my system, and only in my home, would still not want to use .toUTCString(). Because it is showing UTC (also known as GMT). London is not always on GMT. In summer, we move to GMT+1, so the .toUTCString() result would mislead anyone who didn't notice the "GMT" and do the time adjustment in their head.
If I wanted a natural-language time, to make non-computer literate users comfortable, I would construct it manually from parts, using a library like moment.js. If I wanted a quick-and-dirty solution, I would use .toString() which at least will move to Summer time when appropriate.

new Date() works differently in Chrome and Firefox

I want to convert date string to Date by javascript, use this code:
var date = new Date('2013-02-27T17:00:00');
alert(date);
'2013-02-27T17:00:00' is UTC time in JSON object from server.
But the result of above code is different between Firefox and Chrome:
Firefox returns:
Wed Feb 27 2013 17:00:00 GMT+0700 (SE Asia Standard Time)
Chrome returns:
Thu Feb 28 2013 00:00:00 GMT+0700 (SE Asia Standard Time)
It's different 1 day, the correct result I would expect is the result from Chrome.
Demo code: http://jsfiddle.net/xHtqa/2/
How can I fix this problem to get the same result from both?

The correct format for UTC would be 2013-02-27T17:00:00Z (Z is for Zulu Time). Append Z if not present to get correct UTC datetime string.

Yeah, unfortunately the date-parsing algorithms are implementation-dependent. From the specification of Date.parse (which is used by new Date):
The String may be interpreted as a local time, a UTC time, or a time in some other time zone, depending on the contents of the String. The function first attempts to parse the format of the String according to the rules called out in Date Time String Format (15.9.1.15). If the String does not conform to that format the function may fall back to any implementation-specific heuristics or implementation-specific date formats.
To make the Date constructor not (maybe) use the local timezone, use a datetime string with timezone information, e.g. "2013-02-27T17:00:00Z". However, it is hard to find a format that is reliable parsed by every browser - the ISO format is not recognised by IE<8 (see JavaScript: Which browsers support parsing of ISO-8601 Date String with Date.parse). Better, use a unix timestamp, i.e. milliseconds since unix epoch, or use a regular expression to break the string down in its parts and then feed those into Date.UTC.

I found one thing here. It seems the native Firefox Inspector Console might have a bug:
If I run "new Date()" in the native Inspector, it shows a date with wrong timezone, GMT locale, but running the same command in the Firebug Extension Console, the date shown uses my correct timezone (GMT-3:00).

Noticed that FireFox wasn't returning the same result as Chrome. Looks like the format you use in kendo.toString for date makes a difference.
The last console result is what I needed:

Try using moment.js. It goes very well and in similar fashion with all the browsers. comes with many formatting options. use moment('date').format("") instead of New Date('date')