Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
Can I use multiple frameworks on a single website page?
I try to use multiple frameworks like Angular, Vue, or React in one website view .. is that good or we can only use one
Yes. It is usually done in big enterprise setting with many separate front-end teams each responsible for a smaller portion of a single web app. Architecting a clean approach for it can be difficult so I recommend that you avoid it if you can. Problems include:
How to handle routing such that intra- and inter-framework routes work.
How to share state (such as auth tokens) between apps.
How to share components (and code in general) between apps.
How to avoid importing the same library used by separate frameworks twice.
A popular approach is called micro frontends which mimics the micro service approach for the front end. I’m not aware of any research for how well this works in the wild.
An example (meta) framework that handles this kind of architecture for you is single-spa.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Welcome stackoverflow community.
I'm doing small project, simple single-page website. It will also contain contact form which takes user to different page. I decided to create a database since on website I will do few responsive features ie. booking calendar where occupied dates won't be available. I wrote all my projects in vanilla js so far. I'm wondering that adding react to this project will be overkill.
I did research and know roughly cons and props for using it but I couldn't find answer if react gives you some extra safety features comparing to using vanilla js over attacks to website, and if yes, does it makes sense to write whole project in react just for those features?
Many thanks for any feedback.
I don't think you should be rewriting your app in react just for security. If you have any sensitive information. You should be keeping it on the server and not on the front-end.
For a small project. Vanilla JS can be enough. React is just for helping you manage and create UI components. It will not give you any extra security as it is still javascript in the end.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I've been coding React for the last couple of months now. I thought, initially, just going through the React official docs would be sufficient. But I've had to learn some other tools in order to really make my apps useful/easier to developer. For example, tools like Redux and react-router. How come these tools don't already come with React officially? What's the true purpose of React vs other JS frameworks?
ReactJs is not a framework ,it's a JavaScript library and it's not a language ,it's build upon JavaScript . It's a way to solve your common problems and complex tasks easy to do.
Angularjs/Angular is a fully fledged framework - it gives you built-in solutions for promises ($q), ajax calls ($http), routing and intra-component communication via services amongst others.
Reactjs on the other hand is much less opinionated. It provides a mechanism to layout and structure view code and practically nothing else (from the list above). So it's much lighter weight and you are much freer to use other libraries/packages where you feel it is necessary.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Meteor.js integrates well inside a Mantra.js architecture, but does it have advantages since it slows the running of my requests.
For instance a dummy request in GraphQL (get a random string from the server) runs in few ms using Apollo Client and 1 second and more using Mantra.js (exact same request wrapping Apollo stack).
It only depends what kind of project you want to work on.
Mantra.js is an architecture framework for Meteor.js, that means :
it helps a developer to follow the creation and development of its modules corresponding to the Mantra framework. The developer is free to use any kind of front-end library he/she wants, any Data Query and Client caching he wants, but in my opinion, it doesn't really improve the quality of the code. Someone can organize a project with own rules and it can be maintainable easily.
So if your team is comfortable with your code structure you definitively don't need something like Mantra.js.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
We have a project implemented using ASP.NET MVC 4. it is a multi page application.
We use jQuery for handling client side interactions. Now the js file has a lot of callback functions. Is there a better way to define and manage them?
Can you suggest any js library to define these callback functions and to handle the response from the server?
I have gone through backbone js and knockout js. it has been mentioned that it is extremely useful in organizing single page applications.
Would it be helpful in our project (which is a multi page appilcation) or will it cause an overhead?
I think this will be useful,
Node.js: What techniques are there for writing clean, simple callback code?
See "Trevor Burnham" answer. Also see the links given here.
I am not understanding your question clearly. Are you looking for reduce the no of files? what you are mentioning here for the term Organize. Here i added points for improving performance
Hope this will be useful,
Make the repeated functionalities as a common function and differentiate with various parameters or flags.
Reduce the new variables creations mostly.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
We have an existing Rails 3.1 consumer-facing web app and are reworking the UI to be far more interactive, snappy, app-like.
We have a modestly complex data model, but there's only a modest need for form-based user input.
We use jQuery now, with plugins to do nice effects, but overall, our JS skills are weak.
Our primary objective is to find a framework that helps us structure and organize our JS code and simplify the cases where we do have data bindings, AJAX, etc. in our Rails 3.1 world.
We'll learn how to do JS properly, but while we do, is there a clear framework we could learn and work within?
I don't know Dojo, but Backbone vs Knockout is a bit like comparing apples to oranges.
Backbone provides a structure for a web application + synchronization with the backend, whereas Knockout drives UI updates. There is some overlap between the two, but it doesn't mean they are actual competitors. There is even a project that tries to combine both - Knockback.
Last but not least, there is a great discussion on Bb vs Ko.
EDIT: I've just found this: http://addyosmani.github.com/todomvc/ - a comparison of different approaches to creating the same TODO app.