I am learning fetch and javascript testing using jest. I've encountered the following problem and have tried to resolve it but failed:
I am trying to validate some data from JSON from https://reqres.in/api/users/1 using JavaScript Jest testing via fetch() to fetch the data from JSON. But it returns failed as (see also screenshot attached):
expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: "George"
Received: undefined
The JSON data from https://reqres.in/api/users/1:
data:
id 1
email "george.bluth#reqres.in"
first_name "George"
last_name "Bluth"
avatar "https://s3.amazonaws.com/uifaces/faces/twitter/calebogden/128.jpg"
Here is what I've done:
I created a user.js file which has a function called fetchData() to fetch the data from https://reqres.in/api/users/1. The fetchData() code:
function fetchData(){
return fetch('https://reqres.in/api/users/1')
.then(response => response.json());
});
I also created a user.test.js test file as:
const fetchData = require('./user');
test('Verify first name', () => {
return fetchData().then(data => {
expect(data.first_name).toEqual('George');
});
});
when I run the test (npx jest user.test.js), it returned failed and showed the result as indicated above. The test should pass as the JSON data for first name matches the expected string "George". I think the problem here is that the data that was returned by JSON somehow is incorrect and so it says undefined. How should I correct my code?
I've tried a number of ways trying to fix this error, including using JSON.stringify and JSON.parse to return the JSON data in order to compare with the expected string, but both not successful. I'm at this point not sure what I have done incorrectly. Can someone help me in pinpointing to me why it says undefine?
Your help is very much appreciated.
The response is:
{
"data": {
"id": 1,
"email": "george.bluth#reqres.in",
"first_name": "George",
"last_name": "Bluth",
"avatar": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/uifaces/faces/twitter/calebogden/128.jpg"
},
"ad": {
"company": "StatusCode Weekly",
"url": "http://statuscode.org/",
"text": "A weekly newsletter focusing on software development, infrastructure, the server, performance, and the stack end of things."
}
}
There is data key in the response, so it should be:
test('Verify first name', () => {
return fetchData().then(data => {
expect(data.data.first_name).toEqual('George');
});
});
Related
I'm trying to fetch some data from an API. The below code "works" when I log the results to console like console.log(liveInfo.tracks), but when I try to do console.log(liveInfo.tracks.current) it fails with this error: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'current'). Isn't liveInfo.tracks.current how one would normally access the key-value pair?
componentDidMount() {
fetch('https://kchungradio.airtime.pro/api/live-info-v2')
.then(res => res.json())
.then(
(result) => {
this.setState({
isLoaded: true,
liveInfo: result
})
}
)
}
The json looks more or less like this:
{
"station": {
"env": "production",
},
"tracks": {
"previous": {
"name": "a",
"metadata": {
"id": 1,
},
},
"current": {
"name": "b",
"metadata": {
"id": 2,
}
}
}
}
Because at some point liveInfo.tracks was undefined
Although there is a lack of hints, a common mistake when fetching data from lifecycle is trying to retrieve the value through the state before setData occurs.
Before you use liveInfo, make sure that data fetching is finished
like this
class SomeComponent = {
render() {
if(!this.state.liveInfo?.tracks?.current) return null
....
}
}
It looks you are trying to access to the current before it is filled on the componentDidMount, it means before the fetch has been performed. I suggest you to initialize the state like this:
state = {
isLoaded: false,
liveInfo: {
tracks: {
curent: {}
}
}
};
So you will be able to access the current property inside tracks without facing the TypeError. I made a codesandbox, so you can check an example there.
If this does not solve your problem, please let me know ;)
Your call looks right,
another way to get the value is console.log(liveInfo.tracks["current"]);
but I think your tracks has no value at runtime. Maybe you can show us more code where you are call console.log.
Maybe you run twice in your statement and at first time it is undefined and throw the error. So add a null check like this console.log(liveInfo?.tracks?.current);
Use Question mark (?)
? will check for null. If your object is null ? will handle it.
liveInfo?.tracks?.current
this is the right approach.
Further -
liveInfo?.tracks?.current?.metadata
I am running into a problem where when I submit a "property listing" I get this response:
{"owner_id":"Batman","address":"test","state":"test","sale_price":"test"}
The thing is "owner_id" is supposed to equal or associate with owner's id in a different table/JSON file (e.g owner_id = owner.id), not a string in this case which is why the object is not saving on the back-end.
Is anyone in vanilla JavaScript able to show me an example on how to associate owner_id and owner.id?
It'd be more like :
{
owner: {
id: "Batman"
},
address: "test",
state: "test",
sale_price: "test"
}
You should take a look at : https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_json_objects.asp
EDIT: Not sure how you're fetching this data but it seems like you want to handle the response you're getting.
Here is a simple GET request using the fetch api:
fetch('http://example.com/heroes') //this is the path to your source where you're getting your response data
.then((response) => {
return response.json();
//above you return a promise containing your response data
//you can also handle your response before declaring it in a var here
})
.then((myJson) => {
//you have stored your response data as a var myJson
console.log(myJson);
//here you can work your response data in any way you need
// to show an example (not that you would do this) I've provided a owner object that checks if it's property is equal to the incoming data
var owner = {
"id": Batman,
}
if ( myJson.owner_id === owner.id ) {
//do something here
}
});
More info here.
I'm using Dynamoose to simplify my interactions with DynamoDB in a node.js application. I'm trying to write a query using Dynamoose's Model.query function that will search a table using an index, but it seems like Dynamoose is not including all of the info required to process the query and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
Here's what the schema looks like:
const UserSchema = new dynamoose.Schema({
"user_id": {
"hashKey": true,
"type": String
},
"email": {
"type": String,
"index": {
"global": true,
"name": "email-index"
}
},
"first_name": {
"type": String,
"index": {
"global": true,
"name": "first_name-index"
}
},
"last_name": {
"type": String,
"index": {
"global": true,
"name": "last_name-index"
}
}
)
module.exports = dynamoose.model(config.usersTable, UserSchema)
I'd like to be able to search for users by their email address, so I'm writing a query that looks like this:
Users.query("email").contains(query.email)
.using("email-index")
.all()
.exec()
.then( results => {
res.status(200).json(results)
}).catch( err => {
res.status(500).send("Error searching for users: " + err)
})
I have a global secondary index defined for the email field:
When I try to execute this query, I'm getting the following error:
Error searching for users: ValidationException: Either the KeyConditions or KeyConditionExpression parameter must be specified in the request.
Using the Dynamoose debugging output, I can see that the query winds up looking like this:
aws:dynamodb:query:request - {
"FilterExpression": "contains (#a0, :v0)",
"ExpressionAttributeNames": {
"#a0": "email"
},
"ExpressionAttributeValues": {
":v0": {
"S": "mel"
}
},
"TableName": "user_qa",
"IndexName": "email-index"
}
I note that the actual query sent to DynamoDB does not contain KeyConditions or KeyConditionExpression, as the error message indicates. What am I doing wrong that prevents this query from being written correctly such that it executes the query against the global secondary index I've added for this table?
As it turns out, calls like .contains(text) are used as filters, not query parameters. DynamoDB can't figure out if the text in the index contains the text I'm searching for without looking at every single record, which is a scan, not a query. So it doesn't make sense to try to use .contains(text) in this context, even though it's possible to call it in a chain like the one I constructed. What I ultimately needed to do to make this work is turn my call into a table scan with the .contains(text) filter:
Users.scan({ email: { contains: query.email }}).all().exec().then( ... )
I am not familiar with Dynamoose too much but the following code below will do an update on a record using node.JS and DynamoDB. See the key parameter I have below; by the error message you got it seems you are missing this.
To my knowledge, you must specify a key for an UPDATE request. You can checks the AWS DynamoDB docs to confirm.
var params = {
TableName: table,
Key: {
"id": customerID,
},
UpdateExpression: "set customer_name= :s, customer_address= :p, customer_phone= :u, end_date = :u",
ExpressionAttributeValues: {
":s": customer_name,
":p": customer_address,
":u": customer_phone
},
ReturnValues: "UPDATED_NEW"
};
await docClient.update(params).promise();
I have been trying to figure out how to do 2fa with webauthn and I have the registration part working. The details are really poorly documented, especially all of the encoding payloads in javascript. I am able to register a device to a user, but I am not able to authenticate with that device. For reference, I'm using these resources:
https://github.com/cedarcode/webauthn-ruby
https://www.passwordless.dev/js/mfa.register.js
And specifically, for authentication, I'm trying to mimic this js functionality:
https://www.passwordless.dev/js/mfa.register.js
In my user model, I have a webauthn_id, and several u2f devices, each of which has a public_key and a webauthn_id.
In my Rails app, I do:
options = WebAuthn::Credential.options_for_get(allow: :webauthn_id)
session[:webauthn_options] = options
In my javascript, I try to mimic the js file above and I do (this is embedded ruby):
options = <%= raw #options.as_json.to_json %>
options.challenge = WebAuthnHelpers.coerceToArrayBuffer(options.challenge);
options.allowCredentials = options.allowCredentials.map((c) => {
c.id = WebAuthnHelpers.coerceToArrayBuffer(c.id);
return c;
});
navigator.credentials.get({ "publicKey": options }).then(function (credentialInfoAssertion)
{
// send assertion response back to the server
// to proceed with the control of the credential
alert('here');
}).catch(function (err)
{
debugger
console.error(err); /* THIS IS WHERE THE ERROR IS THROWN */
});
The problem is, I cannot get past navigator.credentials.get, I get this error in the javascript console:
TypeError: CredentialsContainer.get: Element of 'allowCredentials' member of PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions can't be converted to a dictionary
options at the time navigator.credentials.get is called looks like this:
I've tried every which way to convert my db-stored user and device variables into javascript properly encoded and parsed variables but cannot seem to get it to work. Anything obvious about what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks for any help,
Kevin
UPDATE -
Adding options json generated by the server:
"{\"challenge\":\"SSDYi4I7kRWt5wc5KjuAvgJ3dsQhjy7IPOJ0hvR5tMg\",\"timeout\":120000,\"allowCredentials\":[{\"type\":\"public-key\",\"id\":\"OUckfxGNLGGASUfGiX-1_8FzehlXh3fKvJ98tm59mVukJkKb_CGk1avnorL4sQQASVO9aGqmgn01jf629Jt0Z0SmBpDKd9sL1T5Z9loDrkLTTCIzrIRqhwPC6yrkfBFi\"},{\"type\":\"public-key\",\"id\":\"Fj5T-WPmEMTz139mY-Vo0DTfsNmjwy_mUx6jn5rUEPx-LsY51mxNYidprJ39_cHeAOieg-W12X47iJm42K0Tsixj4_Fl6KjdgYoxQtEYsNF-LPhwtoKwYsy1hZgVojp3\"}]}"
This is an example of the serialised JSON data returned by our implementation:
{
"challenge": "MQ1S8MBSU0M2kiJqJD8wnQ",
"timeout": 60000,
"rpId": "identity.acme.com",
"allowCredentials": [
{
"type": "public-key",
"id": "k5Ti8dLdko1GANsBT-_NZ5L_-8j_8TnoNOYe8mUcs4o",
"transports": [
"internal"
]
},
{
"type": "public-key",
"id": "LAqkKEO99XPCQ7fsUa3stz7K76A_mE5dQwX4S3QS6jdbI9ttSn9Hu37BA31JUGXqgyhTtskL5obe6uZxitbIfA",
"transports": [
"usb"
]
},
{
"type": "public-key",
"id": "nbN3S08Wv2GElRsW9AmK70J1INEpwIywQcOl6rp_DWLm4mcQiH96TmAXSrZRHciZBENVB9rJdE94HPHbeVjtZg",
"transports": [
"usb"
]
}
],
"userVerification": "discouraged",
"extensions": {
"txAuthSimple": "Sign in to your ACME account",
"exts": true,
"uvi": true,
"loc": true,
"uvm": true
}
}
This is parsed to an object and the code used to coerce those base64url encoded values is:
credentialRequestOptions.challenge = WebAuthnHelpers.coerceToArrayBuffer(credentialRequestOptions.challenge);
credentialRequestOptions.allowCredentials = credentialRequestOptions.allowCredentials.map((c) => {
c.id = WebAuthnHelpers.coerceToArrayBuffer(c.id);
return c;
});
Hope that helps. The JSON data is retreived via a fetch() call and the byte[] fields are encoded as base64url on the serverside.
What I am trying to do
I am creating a social media app with react native and firebase. I am trying to call a function, and have that function return a list of posts from off of my server.
Problem
Using the return method on a firebase query gives me a hard to use object array:
Array [
Object {
"-L2mDBZ6gqY6ANJD6rg1": Object {
//...
},
},
]
I don't like how there is an object inside of an object, and the whole thing is very hard to work with. I created a list inside my app and named it items, and when pushing all of the values to that, I got a much easier to work with object:
Array [
Object {
//...
"key": "-L2mDBZ6gqY6ANJD6rg1",
},
]
This object is also a lot nicer to use because the key is not the name of the object, but inside of it.
I would just return the array I made, but that returns as undefined.
My question
In a function, how can I return an array I created using a firebase query? (to get the objects of an array)
My Code
runQ(group){
var items = [];
//I am returning the entire firebase query...
return firebase.database().ref('posts/'+group).orderByKey().once ('value', (snap) => {
snap.forEach ( (child) => {
items.push({
//post contents
});
});
console.log(items)
//... but all I want to return is the items array. This returns undefined though.
})
}
Please let me know if I'm getting your question correctly. So, the posts table in database looks like this right now:
And you want to return these posts in this manner:
[
{
"key": "-L1ELDwqJqm17iBI4UZu",
"message": "post 1"
},
{
"key": "-L1ELOuuf9hOdydnI3HU",
"message": "post 2"
},
{
"key": "-L1ELqFi7X9lm6ssOd5d",
"message": "post 3"
},
{
"key": "-L1EMH-Co64-RAQ1-AvU",
"message": "post 4"
}
...
]
Is this correct? If so, here's what you're suppose to do:
var items = [];
firebase.database().ref('posts').orderByKey().once('value', (snapshot) => {
snapshot.forEach((child) => {
// 'key' might not be a part of the post, if you do want to
// include the key as well, then use this code instead
//
// const post = child.val();
// const key = child.key;
// items.push({ ...post, key });
//
// Otherwise, the following line is enough
items.push(child.val());
});
// Then, do something with the 'items' array here
})
.catch(() => { });
Off the topics here: I see that you're using firebase.database().... to fetch posts from the database, are you using cloud functions or you're fetching those posts in your App, using users' devices to do so? If it's the latter, you probably would rather use cloud functions and pagination to fetch posts, mainly because of 2 reasons:
There might be too many posts to fetch at one time
This causes security issues, because you're allowing every device to connect to your database (you'd have to come up with real good security rules to keep your database safe)