I am currently trying to figure out all the functions that my IDE has, and I have come across a predefined folder when I create a project that is called 'scratches and consoles'.
The IDE only allows me to create Scratch Files but I don´t know what that kind of file is and what Is its purpose. Could someone give me a hand with this?
It's something like temporary notes with ability to highlight/format your code.
Sometimes you may need to create temporary notes or draft up some code outside of the project context. Instead of switching to a different application for this purpose, you can use scratch files and scratch buffers.
You can read more about it at JetBrains - Scratch files.
Related
How to organize Vue-JS project [files and directory]: Non Javascript way?
Coming from a non-javascript background, I found Vue.js very intuitive and easy to use. My earlier experience in Javascript is with JQuery and vanilla javascript on the browser.
I created an application using Vue , Vue-components and vue router. Everything works fine.
My problem is, I have ended up writing a lot of code in a single index.html file of my project. This file contains over 10 templates that I have created and attached to different component in my app. I want to know that is there a non-javascript way to organize these templates in seperate files.
I see that there are options using webpack and browserify to modularize the project. But coming from non javascript background, I don't find them intuitive. I don't want to go node - npm way because that has its own learning curve and moreover it downloads a dozen of files and dependencies in my project which I don't understand. I am old school and more comfortable downloading the files and including them in the webpages.
So probably, you understand where I am going to. I need a solution where I could put my templates as separate files and read those files in the different components.
What I have tried :
Declaring the templates inside my components. But writing all that html inside the component is not that clean. It also, makes my JS file too huge. I am better in putting all data in the index.html instead.
Storing template as smaller chunk "homepage.html","about.html" and in my components, using $.get / $.load to read different components in ready function of the component. This works but I still have to fire an additional ajax call for each component which is not efficient.
Please refrain from suggesting the obvious node-npm [webpack and browserify] way. I know thats what is supported by Vue but this needs a learning curve and complete setup. Answer to this question would actually help other developers who hesitate going the node-npm way.
Please shout back if you need more clarifications to the question.
The options you've mentioned are your only real ones... the HTML of the template needs to be available when it's needed, so you either have to have it within your html file off the bat, or load it using AJAX or an in-browser loader like RequireJS (and this extension that allows it to load HTML https://github.com/requirejs/text).
In-file templates make sense for very small projects. As your project grows, you'll need to start using the tools that are built for this. NPM rocks and every JS package that you'll ever need can be included in your project in seconds.
I highly encourage you to try the Vue CLI
It does use node, npm, webpack and downloads dozens of files. Which you've you've explicitly asked for not to use, so let me clarify:
The Vue CLI takes care of the complexity and configures webpack for you.
You don't even have to know it's using webpack.
It's very developer friendly (it even has a built-in gui) and lowers the barrier to entry compared configuring a webpack config.
I hope you'll also find it "intuitive and easy to use".
I'm working on a team of developers that keeps reference directives in various files for intellisense purposes. As you can imagine, it's impossible to maintain these files. As such, I'd like to know if there's a way to dynamically generate them. Any way. At all. No matter how kooky.
Here's a reference to the kind of thing I'm talking about: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/bb385682.aspx#ReferenceDirectives
I'm trying to do this on the fly. Say, to dynamically make some references for every js file in a folder. Whatever. Anything. I'll run with it once I get a good starting point.
Why not use T4 to read all the files in the current folder and below? (accounting for, if necessary scripts that are not actually included in the project but present in the file system).
Or even better and more likely related to what you are trying to do?
Use the nice centralized _references.js VS helper for scripts that are core in functionality to the others that you are editing.
So I'm working on a just for fun project to get practice using HTML/CSS/Javascript.
I'm using Aptana to write all my code and it is currently set up to run and work in a browser (obviously) it's a text adventure game.
It would be really cool though to be able to compile the code into an executable file that runs in its own window, not in a browser.
Is this something relatively easy to accomplish?
Thanks in advance for any help! :)
FF and Chrome provide a function to run a custom website in an app mode. That means no menubars, no addressbar and a complete window for the website. Maybe this is already what you are looking for.
http://www.rarst.net/software/dedicated-web-app-window/
https://superuser.com/questions/33548/starting-google-chrome-in-application-mode
https://superuser.com/questions/171235/does-internet-explorer-have-something-equivalent-to-chromes-app-mode
But if you are interested in compiled code for speeding up your game, this is not the way to achieve this.
For Windows as OS
see http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/docs/libfunctions/_IECreateEmbedded.htm
AutoIt is a scripting language for basically everything (with automation). SciTE is the editor to go.
In the example of the _IECreateEmbedded function, just change:
_IENavigate($oIE, "http://www.autoitscript.com")
to
_IENavigate($oIE, "file://.../thegame.html")
Very simple, you just have to copy-paste it and build it - you can even build it Online: AutoIt Online Compiler
There are many different ways you can acheive this.
If you're only targeting windows machines, then creating a HTA would be the simplest approach.
The modification to the structure of your existing code would be minimal, its essentially changing the file type and adding an extra couple of tags in. If you wanted a single file, instead of an exe and any resources (images etc) that you use you would have to base64 encode your images, and insert external scripts into the main page.
for information about embedding images and icons into a hta: http://www.john-am.com/2010/07/building-a-self-contained-hta-with-embedded-images-and-icons/
You could also use AppJS, node-webkit or similar type projects, but they would add around 30MB of stuff thats not being used.
I am primarily a c# programmer. I have recently been getting into some jquery development. when I am working on applications in c#, I create a new class file (.cs) for every new class that I create.
How do people generally structure their jquery/javascript applications. I would like to reuse some functionality across pages, so do I put each function in it's own .js file? or is it best practice to group like functions into files? I can't see putting each on in it's own file as that would create many calls to import individual file into a page....
How are other people handling these types of situations.
Thanks for any thoughts.
EDIT - I should have mentioned that I am beginning to look at unit testing with QUnit and figured it would be good to have proper structure of my project to better facilitate unit testing.
If you DO put them all in separate files, you would want to have a build script that combines and minimizes them into a single one (or just a few) so you do not have 500 Javascript files to download to your browser.
I would suggest putting your common functionalities to a util.js file and then arrange your javascript codes according to functionality.
However it is not a good practice to have lots of js files included in every page, thus you might consider combinin the files into a single file and minifying that final js file. this way you would have optimized your final product while being able to unit test functionalities separately.
I generally keep all plugins into their perspective files but functions I create I tend to place into a "global.js" file that the entire site will pull from. Then I don't have to worry about pulling in specific files when a need a specific function. It will all be in the global.
Put it all in one file. Multiple HTTP requests are more expensive than big files, plus you're assured that the file containing the function you need is already loaded.
I've developing JavaScript since many years but have never really thought about the whole testing, developing and building stuff - but I realized it's pretty much necessary. We've just used a Subversion repository with simple release tagging (switching to git soon). As a new bigger pure JavaScript project (using jQuery) is arriving soon, I'd like to optimize the whole process.
I already did some research but never found a good starting tutorial.
It's definetly a good idea to split classes and separate code blocks into several js-files and not a big one (as Prototype or jQuery do it). These js-files must be "build" into a single file. How do I achieve that?
It's pretty much necessary to Unit-test the stuff me and my colleagues are coding. I found the js-test-driver which has an eclipse plugin that seems to be doing his job quite good. If my developer-folder contains all these src- and src-test-files, how do I integrate this in the building process?
For testing, take a look at this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32809/javascript-unit-testing
For merging all of your JavaScript into one file you can use something like YUI Compressor. You need to be looking for a minimizer first, compression second. A minimizer just takes the files and merges them together and gets rid of whitespace. A compressor will actually try to optimize the js for you by changing variable names and removing unnecessary code.
As for unit testing I am unsure of how you will want to do that. There are a few unit test libraries out there. A popular tool for testing is Selenium. I don't currently do unit testing so I am out of my element there..
For setting up your code you could always look at using a JavaScript framework like ExtJS or JavaScriptMVC. Those help you with setting up your code in the proper way and also helps focus your team on the proper standards and coding structure while also writing a lot of the code for you so you don't have to re-invent the wheel.
EDIT: Just a quick after thought. Even if you don't want to use a JavaScript framework, I would suggest checking them out, especially ExtJS, just to see how they organize their code and some of the tricks they do to keep it clean.
I'll answer part of your question:
These js-files must be "build" into a
single file.
This is possible only with server side language - in ASP.NET you have built in tools for that, otherwise build your own "merger" server side file and reference that file instead of the actual .js files.
These js-files must be "build" into a single file. How do I achieve that?
Definitely keep your files separate in version control, and only merge them during the build process.
The YUI compressor mentioned elsewhere is a java-based tool that will not only merge but -- of course! -- compress your files for faster download.
If you just want a simple merge of files, a simple Perl or bash-script (or other preferred scripting language) could concatenate multiple .js files into one for release -- just make sure that the build script also updates all HTML in the release to reference only the single page.