We Keep Coding

conditional rendering with toast and usestate does not work with react

I have my state and I want to display the component if the value is true but in the console I receive the error message Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within render). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state my code
import React, { useState} from "react";
import { useToasts } from "react-toast-notifications";
const Index = () => {
const [test, setTest]= useState(true);
const { addToast } = useToasts();
function RenderToast() {
return (
<div>
{ addToast('message') }
</div>
)}
return (
<div>
{test && <RenderToast /> }
</div>
)
}

You cannot set state during a render. And I'm guessing that addToast internally sets some state.
And looking at the docs for that library, you don't explicitly render the toasts. You just call addToast and then the <ToastProvider/> farther up in the tree shows them.
So to make this simple example works where a toast is shown on mount, you should use an effect to add the toast after the first render, and make sure your component is wrapped by <ToastProvider>
const Index = () => {
const { addToast } = useToasts();
useEffect(() => {
addToast('message')
}, [])
return <>Some Content here</>
}
// Example app that includes the toast provider
const MyApp = () => {
<ToastProvider>
<Index />
</ToastProvider>
}
how i can display the toast based on a variable for exemple display toast after receive error on backend?
You simply call addToast where you are handling your server communication.
For example:
const Index = () => {
const { addToast } = useToasts();
useEffect(() => {
fetchDataFromApi()
.then(data => ...)
.catch(error => addToast(`error: ${error}`))
}, [])
//...
}

Accessing multiple easy-peasy stores from single component

I'm trying to access 2 different stores in a single component, but worry that perhaps the architecture of my app may need to change as easy-peasy may not have this functionality.
I have a GlobalStore
import { createStore } from 'easy-peasy';
const globalModel = {
menuOpen: false,
toggleMenu: action((state, payload) => {
state.menuOpen = payload;
}),
};
const GlobalStore = createStore(globalModel);
export default GlobalStore;
Just for this example, I'll use a single state and action used in the store to define whether the navigation menu is open or not.
The GlobalStore appears at the top level of my app in my App.js file.
import React from 'react';
import { StoreProvider } from 'easy-peasy';
import GlobalStore from './store/GlobalStore';
const App = () => {
return (
<StoreProvider store={GlobalStore}>
</StoreProvider>
);
};
export default App;
Now, further down the tree, I have another store SearchStore that dictates which view is active in the component.
import { createStore } from 'easy-peasy';
import { action } from 'easy-peasy';
const searchModel = {
view: 'filter',
setView: action((state, payload) => {
state.view = payload;
}),
};
const SearchStore = createStore(searchModel);
export default SearchStore;
The issue I have now is that in a component that I need to be able to access both stores to update the view with the setView action in the SearchStore and get the value of menuOpen from the GlobalStore but cannot access both concurrently.
The example I have in a component is that I have a styled component that when clicked calls the action setView but its position is also defined by whether the menuOpen is true or not. but obviously, if I try and get the state of menuOpen it will be undefined as it does not exist in SearchStore
const Close = styled.span`
$(({ menuOpen }) => menuOpen ? `
// styles go here
` : `` }
`;
const setView = useStoreActions((action) => action.setView);
const menuOpen = useStoreState((state) => state.menuOpen);
<Close menuOpen={menuOpen} onClick={() => setView('list')}>
Is this possible? Any help would be much appreciated.

Alternative 1: extending the global store
To access both store (via the useStoreState/Actions from the StoreProvider), you could nest both "sub" stores into the GlobalStore:
// SearchModel.js
import { action } from 'easy-peasy';
const searchModel = {
view: 'filter',
setView: action((state, payload) => {
state.view = payload;
}),
};
export default searchModel;
// MenuModel.js
import { action } from 'easy-peasy';
const menuModel = {
isOpen: false,
toggle: action((state, payload) => {
state.isOpen = !state.isOpen;
}),
};
export default menuModel;
// GlobalStore.js
import { createStore } from 'easy-peasy';
import menu from './MenuhModel';
import search from './SearchModel';
const globalModel = {
menu,
search,
};
const GlobalStore = createStore(globalModel);
export default GlobalStore;
This way, you can access both stores at your convenience, using the hooks:
const searchState = useStoreState((state) => state.search);
const menuState = useStoreState((state) => state.menu);
const searchActions = useStoreActions((action) => action.search);
const menuActions = useStoreActions((action) => action.menu);
Alternative 2: useLocalStore()
If you do not want to extend the global store, you could create a local store, by using the useLocalStore():
function Menu() {
const [state, actions] = useLocalStore(() => ({
isOpen: false,
toggle: action((state, payload) => {
state.isOpen = !state.isOpen;
}),
}));
return (
<div>
{state.isOpen && <MenuItems />}
<button onClick={() => actions.toggle()}>Open menu</button>
</div>
);
}
However, the drawback of this approach, is that the state is not global and only available at the component-level.
You could however get around this, by creating your own provider - but then again, alternative 1 would probably be the path of least resistance.

Rest API response not updating until page is refreshed

I've got component that displays contact information from a dealer as chosen by a user. To be more specific, a user selects their location, setting a cookie which then is used to define the API call. I pull in the contact information of the dealer in that location using Axios, store it in a context, and then display the information as necessary through several components: the header, a "current location" component etc.
The problem that I'm currently running into is that the contact information, as displayed in the Header for example, doesn't update until a user performs a hard refresh of the page, so, assuming the default text of the button is something like "Find A Dealer", once a dealer is selected, the button label should say the name of the dealer the user has selected. At present, it isn't working that way. Below is the code for the Header component, and my ApiContext.
ApiContext.tsx
import React, { createContext } from 'react';
import axios from 'axios';
import { makeUseAxios } from 'axios-hooks';
import { useCookie } from 'hooks/use-cookie';
const contextObject = {} as any;
export const context = createContext(contextObject);
const useAxios = makeUseAxios({
axios: axios.create({ baseURL: process.env.GATSBY_API_ENDPOINT }),
});
export const ApiContext = ({ children }: any) => {
const [cookie] = useCookie('one-day-location', '1');
const [{ data }] = useAxios(`${cookie}`);
const { Provider } = context;
return <Provider value={data}>{children}</Provider>;
};
Header.tsx
import React, { ReactNode, useContext, useEffect, useState } from 'react';
import Logo from 'assets/svg/logo.svg';
import css from 'classnames';
import { Button } from 'components/button/Button';
import { Link } from 'components/link/Link';
import { MenuIcon } from 'components/menu-icon/MenuIcon';
import { context } from 'contexts/ApiContext';
import { NotificationBar } from '../notification-bar/NotificationBar';
import s from './Header.scss';
import { MainNav } from './navigation/MainNav';
interface HeaderProps {
navigationContent: ReactNode;
}
export const Header = ({ navigationContent }: HeaderProps) => {
const [scrolled, setScrolled] = useState(false);
const [open, setOpen] = useState(false);
const data = useContext(context);
const buttonLabel = data ? data.name : 'Find a Dealer';
const buttonLink = data ? `tel:${data.phone}` : '/find-a-dealer';
useEffect(() => {
const handleScroll = () => {
const isScrolled = window.scrollY > 10;
if (isScrolled !== scrolled) {
setScrolled(!scrolled);
}
};
document.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll, { passive: true });
return () => {
document.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll);
};
}, [scrolled]);
return (
<>
<NotificationBar notificationContent={navigationContent} />
<header className={scrolled ? css(s.header, s.header__scrolled) : s.header}>
<nav className={s.header__navigation}>
<ul className={s.header__container}>
<li className={s.header__logo}>
<Link to="/" className={s.header__link}>
<Logo />
</Link>
</li>
<li className={s.header__primary}>
<MainNav navigationItems={navigationContent} />
</li>
<li className={s.header__utility}>
<Button href={buttonLink}>{buttonLabel}</Button>
</li>
<li className={s.header__icon}>
<MenuIcon onClick={() => setOpen(!open)} />
</li>
</ul>
</nav>
</header>
</>
);
};
Here is a screenshot of my console logs, where I'm logging what is returned from data in the ApiContext.
Any suggestions on this would be greatly appreciated, even if it means completely refactoring the way that I'm using this. Thanks!

You are almost there, your ApiContext looks good, it retrieves the information and populates the context, however, what you are missing is a useState to trigger an update to force the re-hydration of your buttons.
What is happening is that your context never updates the data constant. At the first rendering is empty, once your request is done and the context is full but your button is never being updated. Something like this may work for you:
const data = useContext(context);
const [newData, setNewData] = useState(data);
const buttonLabel = newData? newData.name : 'Find a Dealer';
const buttonLink = newData? `tel:${newData.phone}` : '/find-a-dealer';
You may need to adapt the code a bit to fit your requirements, nevertheless, you may keep the idea, which is creating a state with your retrieved data.
You can create a useEffect to control when the data changes and populate the state if you wish:
useEffect(()=>{
setNewData(data)
}, [data])

After a lot of digging, I was able to figure this out myself.
Using the recommendations from Ferran as a base, I decided that it would be best to rehydrate the components displaying the contact info from a state, but as I'm using this context in multiple components, I needed to have the state update globally. I moved away from makeUseAxios, to a traditional axios call. The dealer ID is then stored in the state and used in the call. I also created the changeDealer const, which I can pass through the context, and which updates the state:
ApiContext.tsx
import React, { createContext, useEffect, useState } from 'react';
import axios from 'axios';
const contextObject = {} as any;
export const context = createContext(contextObject);
export const ApiContext = ({ children }: any) => {
const [dealerId, setDealerId] = useState(`1`);
useEffect(() => {
axios.get(`${process.env.GATSBY_API_ENDPOINT}/${dealerId}`).then((res) => setDealerId(res.data));
}, [dealerId]);
const changeDealer = (value: any) => {
setDealerId(value);
};
const { Provider } = context;
return <Provider value={{ data: dealerId, changeDealer: changeDealer }}>{children}</Provider>;
};
Then if, for example, I have a button that updates the dealer info, I import the context to the component and pass changeDealer through the it:
import { context } from 'contexts/ApiContext';
const { changeDealer } = useContext(context);
I can then attach it to a button like so:
<Link to="/" onClick={() => changeDealer(dealer.id)}>
Set Location
</Link>
This updates the state globally, changing the contact information across all the components that display it. I will be storing the data in a localStorage item, allowing the data to persist after a page refresh.

React: How to use one variable in one component when it is imported to another component

import React, { useEffect, useState } from 'react';
import { Card } from 'components/Card';
import { dateFilter } from 'helpers';
import Chart from 'chart.js';
import 'chartjs-chart-matrix';
import chroma from 'chroma-js';
import moment from 'moment';
const WeeklyTrafficCard = (props) => {
const { start, end, data, store } = props;
const capacity = store && store.capacity;
var numberOfweeks = 0; //representing how many weeks back
const dateArray = [];
var today = moment();
while (numberOfweeks < 10) {
var from_date = today.startOf('week').format('MM/DD/YY');
var to_date = today.endOf('week').format('MM/DD/YY');
var range = from_date.concat(' ','-',' ',to_date);
dateArray.push(range);
today = today.subtract(7, 'days');
numberOfweeks++;
//console.log(dateArray);
}
const [each_daterange, setDateRange] = useState();
I have this Component called WeeklyTrafficCard and I want to use the variable, each_daterange, in another component, which imported WeeklyTrafficCard as below to send the get request, clearly I cannot use each_daterange directly right here, how I can work around it?
import React, { useContext, useEffect, useState } from 'react';
import { WeeklyTrafficCard } from './WeeklyTrafficCard';
import { AppContext } from 'contexts/App';
import { API_URL } from 'constants/index.js';
import { todayOpen, todayClose } from 'helpers';
import moment from 'moment';
const WeeklyTrafficCardContainer = (props) => {
const { API } = useContext(AppContext);
const { store = {} } = props;
const [data, setData] = useState([]);
const open = todayOpen(store.hours, store.timezone);
const close = todayClose(store.hours, store.timezone);
useEffect(() => {
async function fetchData() {
const result = await API.get(`${API_URL}/api/aggregates`, {
params: {
each_daterange,
every: '1h',
hourStart: 13,
hourStop: 4
},
});

You should use a useEffect(prop drilling) to pass your variable in your parent:
import React, { Component } from "react";
import { render } from "react-dom";
import "./style.css";
const App = () => {
const [myVar, setMyVar] = React.useState('');
return (
<div>
<Child setMyVar={setMyVar} />
{myVar}
</div>
);
};
const Child = ({setMyVar}) => {
const myChildVar = "Hello world !"
React.useEffect( () => setMyVar(myChildVar),[]);
return <div> This is the child</div>
}
render(<App />, document.getElementById("root"));
Here is the repro on stackblitz

Understanding of the Problem
You want to pass data up to the parent from the child.
Manage each_daterange in the parent:
Instead of creating your useState variable each_daterange in the child you can declare it in the parent and pass down it's setter function. For instance:
const WeeklyTrafficCardContainer = (props) => {
const [eachDateRange, setEachDateRange] = useState();
return (
<div>
{/* your return */}
<WeeklyTrafficCard setEachDateRange={setEachDateRange} />
</div>
)
}
If you need to display eachDateRange in the traffic card, or the traffic card needs to completely own that variable, you can create another state variable in the parent and pass a callback to the child (essentially what is above but now you have two different state variables).
The parent becomes
const WeeklyTrafficCardContainer = (props) => {
const [requestDateRange, setRequestDateRange] = useState();
const updateRequestDateRange = (dateRange) => {
setRequestDateRange(dateRange)
}
return (
<div>
{/* your return */}
<WeeklyTrafficCard updateDateRange={updateRequestDateRange} />
</div>
)
}
Then in your WeeklyTrafficCard call props.updateDateRange and pass it the date range whenever each_daterange changes.

Ciao, of course you need a global state manager. My preferred is react-redux. In few word, react-redux allows you to have a state that is shared in all your components. Sharing each_daterange between WeeklyTrafficCardContainer and WeeklyTrafficCard will be very easy if you decide to use it.
This is the more appropriate guide to quick start with react-redux. have a nice coding :)

Keep the value outside of the component, where both can access it. There are other ways to do this, but just as a simple example you could create a simple "store" to hold it and reference that store from each component that needs it:
class Store {
setDateRange (newDateRange) {
this._dateRange = newDateRange;
}
get dateRange () {
return this._dateRange;
}
}
export default new Store(); // singleton; everyone gets the same instance
import store from './Store';
const WeeklyTrafficCard = (props) => {
// use current dateRange value
const dateRange = store.dateRange;
// set new dateRange
store.setDateRange( newDateRange );
// do other stuff
}
import store from './Store';
const WeeklyTrafficCardContainer = (props) => {
// use current dateRange value
const dateRange = store.dateRange;
// set new dateRange
store.setDateRange( newDateRange );
// do other stuff
}
If you want store updates to trigger component re-renders you'd need to add some higher order component plumbing, like redux's connect, or some other mechanism for triggering updates:
// pseudocode; make store an event emitter and return
// a component that re-renders on store events
store.connect = Component => {
return props => {
React.useEffect(() => {
store.addEventListener( ... )
return () => store.removeEventListener( ... )
})
}
}
Or if the components share a common parent, you could lift the state to the parent and pass the information to each component as props. If either component updates the value, the parent state change will trigger a re-render of both components with the new value:
const Parent = () => {
const [dateRange, setDateRange] = React.useState();
return (
<>
<WeeklyTrafficCardContainer
dateRange={dateRange}
onDateRangeChange={newRange => setDateRange(newRange)}
/>
<WeeklyTrafficCard
dateRange={dateRange}
onDateRangeChange={newRange => setDateRange(newRange)}
/>
</>
);
}

Let's rephrase the objective here.
Objective: access each_daterange from WeeklyTrafficCard component in WeeklyTrafficCardContainer component.
Note: simply put, choose the following case based on your problem.
choose using prop if the variable is to be accessed by only one component
choose using context if the variable is to be accessed by more than one components
Solution Cases:
Case A: using prop.
Case A.1. WeeklyTrafficCard is the parent of WeeklyTrafficCardContainer
each_datarange being passed from WeeklyTrafficCard component as prop to WeeklyTrafficCardContainer component
working example for reference: codesandbox - variable passed as prop
// WeeklyTrafficCard.jsx file
const WeeklyTrafficCard = () => {
const [each_daterange, setDateRange] = useState();
return (
<>
...
<WeeklyTrafficCardContainer eachDateRange={each_daterange} />
</>
);
};
// WeeklyTrafficCardContainer.jsx file
const WeeklyTrafficCardContainer = props => {
const eachDateRange = props.eachDateRange;
return (
<>
...
</>
);
};
Case A.2. WeeklyTrafficCard & WeeklyTrafficCardContainer are children of a parent, say WeeklyTraffic component
each_datarange will be present in WeeklyTraffic component which is shared among WeeklyTrafficCard component & WeeklyTrafficCardContainer component
// WeeklyTraffic.jsx file
const WeeklyTraffic = () => {
const [each_daterange, setDateRange] = useState();
return (
<>
...
<WeeklyTrafficCard eachDateRange={each_daterange} />
<WeeklyTrafficCardContainer eachDateRange={each_daterange} />
</>
);
};
// WeeklyTrafficCard.jsx file
const WeeklyTrafficCard = props => {
const eachDateRange = props.eachDateRange;
return (
<>
...
</>
);
};
// WeeklyTrafficCardContainer.jsx file
const WeeklyTrafficCardContainer = props => {
const eachDateRange = props.eachDateRange;
return (
<>
...
</>
);
};
Case B: using context.
follow blog example found: blog - react context
this is preferred way to implement if the variable/variables is/are shared or need to be accessed by more than 1 components

React Context API and avoiding re-renders

I have updated this with an update at the bottom
Is there a way to maintain a monolithic root state (like Redux) with multiple Context API Consumers working on their own part of their Provider value without triggering a re-render on every isolated change?
Having already read through this related question and tried some variations to test out some of the insights provided there, I am still confused about how to avoid re-renders.
Complete code is below and online here: https://codesandbox.io/s/504qzw02nl
The issue is that according to devtools, every component sees an "update" (a re-render), even though SectionB is the only component that sees any render changes and even though b is the only part of the state tree that changes. I've tried this with functional components and with PureComponent and see the same render thrashing.
Because nothing is being passed as props (at the component level) I can't see how to detect or prevent this. In this case, I am passing the entire app state into the provider, but I've also tried passing in fragments of the state tree and see the same problem. Clearly, I am doing something very wrong.
import React, { Component, createContext } from 'react';
const defaultState = {
a: { x: 1, y: 2, z: 3 },
b: { x: 4, y: 5, z: 6 },
incrementBX: () => { }
};
let Context = createContext(defaultState);
class App extends Component {
constructor(...args) {
super(...args);
this.state = {
...defaultState,
incrementBX: this.incrementBX.bind(this)
}
}
incrementBX() {
let { b } = this.state;
let newB = { ...b, x: b.x + 1 };
this.setState({ b: newB });
}
render() {
return (
<Context.Provider value={this.state}>
<SectionA />
<SectionB />
<SectionC />
</Context.Provider>
);
}
}
export default App;
class SectionA extends Component {
render() {
return (<Context.Consumer>{
({ a }) => <div>{a.x}</div>
}</Context.Consumer>);
}
}
class SectionB extends Component {
render() {
return (<Context.Consumer>{
({ b }) => <div>{b.x}</div>
}</Context.Consumer>);
}
}
class SectionC extends Component {
render() {
return (<Context.Consumer>{
({ incrementBX }) => <button onClick={incrementBX}>Increment a x</button>
}</Context.Consumer>);
}
}
Edit: I understand that there may be a bug in the way react-devtools detects or displays re-renders. I've expanded on my code above in a way that displays the problem. I now cannot tell if what I am doing is actually causing re-renders or not. Based on what I've read from Dan Abramov, I think I'm using Provider and Consumer correctly, but I cannot definitively tell if that's true. I welcome any insights.

There are some ways to avoid re-renders, also make your state management "redux-like". I will show you how I've been doing, it far from being a redux, because redux offer so many functionalities that aren't so trivial to implement, like the ability to dispatch actions to any reducer from any actions or the combineReducers and so many others.
Create your reducer
export const initialState = {
...
};
export const reducer = (state, action) => {
...
};
Create your ContextProvider component
export const AppContext = React.createContext({someDefaultValue})
export function ContextProvider(props) {
const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(reducer, initialState)
const context = {
someValue: state.someValue,
someOtherValue: state.someOtherValue,
setSomeValue: input => dispatch('something'),
}
return (
<AppContext.Provider value={context}>
{props.children}
</AppContext.Provider>
);
}
Use your ContextProvider at top level of your App, or where you want it
function App(props) {
...
return(
<AppContext>
...
</AppContext>
)
}
Write components as pure functional component
This way they will only re-render when those specific dependencies update with new values
const MyComponent = React.memo(({
somePropFromContext,
setSomePropFromContext,
otherPropFromContext,
someRegularPropNotFromContext,
}) => {
... // regular component logic
return(
... // regular component return
)
});
Have a function to select props from context (like redux map...)
function select(){
const { someValue, otherValue, setSomeValue } = useContext(AppContext);
return {
somePropFromContext: someValue,
setSomePropFromContext: setSomeValue,
otherPropFromContext: otherValue,
}
}
Write a connectToContext HOC
function connectToContext(WrappedComponent, select){
return function(props){
const selectors = select();
return <WrappedComponent {...selectors} {...props}/>
}
}
Put it all together
import connectToContext from ...
import AppContext from ...
const MyComponent = React.memo(...
...
)
function select(){
...
}
export default connectToContext(MyComponent, select)
Usage
<MyComponent someRegularPropNotFromContext={something} />
//inside MyComponent:
...
<button onClick={input => setSomeValueFromContext(input)}>...
...
Demo that I did on other StackOverflow question
Demo on codesandbox
The re-render avoided
MyComponent will re-render only if the specifics props from context updates with a new value, else it will stay there.
The code inside select will run every time any value from context updates, but it does nothing and is cheap.
Other solutions
I suggest check this out Preventing rerenders with React.memo and useContext hook.

I made a proof of concept on how to benefit from React.Context, but avoid re-rendering children that consume the context object. The solution makes use of React.useRef and CustomEvent. Whenever you change count or lang, only the component consuming the specific proprety gets updated.
Check it out below, or try the CodeSandbox
index.tsx
import * as React from 'react'
import {render} from 'react-dom'
import {CountProvider, useDispatch, useState} from './count-context'
function useConsume(prop: 'lang' | 'count') {
const contextState = useState()
const [state, setState] = React.useState(contextState[prop])
const listener = (e: CustomEvent) => {
if (e.detail && prop in e.detail) {
setState(e.detail[prop])
}
}
React.useEffect(() => {
document.addEventListener('update', listener)
return () => {
document.removeEventListener('update', listener)
}
}, [state])
return state
}
function CountDisplay() {
const count = useConsume('count')
console.log('CountDisplay()', count)
return (
<div>
{`The current count is ${count}`}
<br />
</div>
)
}
function LangDisplay() {
const lang = useConsume('lang')
console.log('LangDisplay()', lang)
return <div>{`The lang count is ${lang}`}</div>
}
function Counter() {
const dispatch = useDispatch()
return (
<button onClick={() => dispatch({type: 'increment'})}>
Increment count
</button>
)
}
function ChangeLang() {
const dispatch = useDispatch()
return <button onClick={() => dispatch({type: 'switch'})}>Switch</button>
}
function App() {
return (
<CountProvider>
<CountDisplay />
<LangDisplay />
<Counter />
<ChangeLang />
</CountProvider>
)
}
const rootElement = document.getElementById('root')
render(<App />, rootElement)
count-context.tsx
import * as React from 'react'
type Action = {type: 'increment'} | {type: 'decrement'} | {type: 'switch'}
type Dispatch = (action: Action) => void
type State = {count: number; lang: string}
type CountProviderProps = {children: React.ReactNode}
const CountStateContext = React.createContext<State | undefined>(undefined)
const CountDispatchContext = React.createContext<Dispatch | undefined>(
undefined,
)
function countReducer(state: State, action: Action) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'increment': {
return {...state, count: state.count + 1}
}
case 'switch': {
return {...state, lang: state.lang === 'en' ? 'ro' : 'en'}
}
default: {
throw new Error(`Unhandled action type: ${action.type}`)
}
}
}
function CountProvider({children}: CountProviderProps) {
const [state, dispatch] = React.useReducer(countReducer, {
count: 0,
lang: 'en',
})
const stateRef = React.useRef(state)
React.useEffect(() => {
const customEvent = new CustomEvent('update', {
detail: {count: state.count},
})
document.dispatchEvent(customEvent)
}, [state.count])
React.useEffect(() => {
const customEvent = new CustomEvent('update', {
detail: {lang: state.lang},
})
document.dispatchEvent(customEvent)
}, [state.lang])
return (
<CountStateContext.Provider value={stateRef.current}>
<CountDispatchContext.Provider value={dispatch}>
{children}
</CountDispatchContext.Provider>
</CountStateContext.Provider>
)
}
function useState() {
const context = React.useContext(CountStateContext)
if (context === undefined) {
throw new Error('useCount must be used within a CountProvider')
}
return context
}
function useDispatch() {
const context = React.useContext(CountDispatchContext)
if (context === undefined) {
throw new Error('useDispatch must be used within a AccountProvider')
}
return context
}
export {CountProvider, useState, useDispatch}

To my understanding, the context API is not meant to avoid re-render but is more like Redux. If you wish to avoid re-render, perhaps looks into PureComponent or lifecycle hook shouldComponentUpdate.
Here is a great link to improve performance, you can apply the same to the context API too