I have an array of contact cards that hold names & addresses etc for users. What I want to do is create another array that removes any duplicate addresses (ie people in the same household) and creates a name that is a combination of the two. For example:
{flatNum: 1, Name: "ken"},{flatNum: 1, Name: "bob"}, {flatNum: 2, Name: "emma"}
would become:
{flatNum: 1, Name: "ken & bob"}, {flatNum: 2, Name: "emma"}
I know how I can achieve this with a long for loop type thing but was hoping to find a more concise method. I am assuming that reduce would be the key and have been playing around. Currently got this:
let contactCardsComb = contactCards.reduce(function(a,b){
if (a.flatNum == b.flatNum){
return a.Name = a.Name+b.Name;
}
});
Which is obviously horribly wrong but any pointers would be great
You could group by flatNum and get the values from the object.
const
data = [{ flatNum: 1, Name: "ken" }, { flatNum: 1, Name: "bob" }, { flatNum: 2, Name: "emma" }],
result = Object.values(data.reduce((r, { flatNum, Name }) => {
if (r[flatNum]) r[flatNum].Name += ' & ' + Name;
else r[flatNum] = { flatNum, Name };
return r;
}, {}));
console.log(result);
I take the OP's Q. as a chance for proofing that an abstract but (highly) configurable reduce task is in no time (less than a minute, here for the OP's problem) suitable for a variety of problems that at first sight do have nothing in common, due to the different environments and the naming of variables etc.
If one takes e.g. the following approach of this answer to another Q. ... "Segregate an array based on same name") ... some days ago, one ...
just needs to change the implementation (line 24) of how to merge the properties of two to be grouped items, and
just has to provide the correct key name (line 42) of the target value one wants to group around all the other list items.
... code ...
// reduce function that groups
// any data item generically by key.
function groupByKeyAndMergeProperties(collector, item) {
const { merge, key, index, list } = collector;
const groupKey = item[key];
let groupItem = index[groupKey];
if (!groupItem) {
// use `Object.assign` initially in order
// to not mutate the original (list's) reference.
groupItem = index[groupKey] = Object.assign({}, item);
list.push(groupItem);
merge(groupItem, null);
} else {
merge(groupItem, item);
}
return collector;
}
// task specific merge function,
// here, according to the OP's goal.
function mergeItemNames(targetItem, sourceItem) {
if (sourceItem !== null) {
targetItem.Name = `${ targetItem.Name } & ${ sourceItem.Name }`;
}
}
const sampleList = [
{ flatNum: 1, Name: "ken" },
{ flatNum: 1, Name: "bob" },
{ flatNum: 2, Name: "emma" },
{ flatNum: 2, Name: "april" },
{ flatNum: 2, Name: "june" },
{ flatNum: 3, Name: "john" }
];
console.log(
sampleList.reduce(groupByKeyAndMergeProperties, {
// task specific reduce configuration.
merge: mergeItemNames,
key: 'flatNum',
index: {},
list: []
}).list
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
this can be easily accomplished by using lodash library,
let contactCards = [
{flatNum: 1, Name: "ken"},
{flatNum: 1, Name: "bob"},
{flatNum: 2, Name: "emma"},
{flatNum: 2, Name: "april"},
{flatNum: 2, Name: "june"}
];
let tempGroup = _.groupBy(contactCards, contact => {
return contact.flatNum;
});
console.log('tempGroup :', tempGroup);
let contactCardsComb = Object
.values(tempGroup)
.map( e => e.reduce( (a,b) =>
({...a, Name: `${ a.Name } & ${ b.Name }` })
));
console.log('result : ', contactCardsComb);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash-compat/3.10.2/lodash.min.js"></script>
// a vanilla approach would be as follows
let flatNums = Array.from(new Set(contactCards.map( e => e.flatNum)))
let groupedContactCards = flatNums
.map( e => contactCards
.filter(contact => contact.flatNum === e))
let reducedContactCards = groupedContactCards
.map( e => e
.reduce((a,b) => ({...a,Name:`${a.Name} & ${b.Name}`})))
console.log(reducedContactCards)
or we can wrap this as below
let reducedContactCards = Array.from(new Set(contactCards.map( e => e.flatNum)))
.map( e => contactCards
.filter(contact => contact.flatNum === e))
.map( e => e.reduce((a,b) => ({...a,Name:`${a.Name} & ${b.Name}`})))
console.log(reducedContactCards)
Related
i'm trying to duplicate objects based on two properties that have multiple values differentiated by a comma.
For example:
I have an object
const obj = {
id: 1
date: "2021"
tst1: "111, 222"
tst2: "AAA, BBB"
}
And I would like the result to be an array of 2 objects in this case (because there are 2 values in tst1 OR tst2, these 2 properties will always have the same nr of values differentiated by a comma)
[{
id: 1,
date: "2021",
tst1: "111",
tst2: "AAA",
},
{
id: 1,
date: "2021",
tst1: "222",
tst2: "BBB",
}]
What I tried is this:
I created a temporary object
const tempObject = {
id: obj.id,
date: obj.date,
}
And then I would split and map the property that has multiple values, like this:
cont newObj = obj.tst1.split(",").map(function(value) {
let finalObj = {}
return finalObj = {
id: tempObject.id,
date: tempObject.date,
tst1: value,
})
And now, the newObj is an array of objects and each object contains a value of tst1.
The problem is I still have to do the same for the tst2...
And I was wondering if there is a simpler method to do this...
Thank you!
Here is an example that accepts an array of duplicate keys to differentiate. It first maps them to arrays of entries by splitting on ',' and then trimming the entries, then zips them by index to create sub-arrays of each specified property, finally it returns a result of the original object spread against an Object.fromEntries of the zipped properties.
const mapDuplicateProps = (obj, props) => {
const splitProps = props.map((p) =>
obj[p].split(',').map((s) => [p, s.trim()])
);
// [ [[ 'tst1', '111' ], [ 'tst1', '222' ]], [[ 'tst2', 'AAA' ], [ 'tst2', 'BBB' ]] ]
const dupeEntries = splitProps[0].map((_, i) => splitProps.map((p) => p[i]));
// [ [[ 'tst1', '111' ], [ 'tst2', 'AAA' ]], [[ 'tst1', '222' ], [ 'tst2', 'BBB' ]] ]
return dupeEntries.map((d) => ({ ...obj, ...Object.fromEntries(d) }));
};
const obj = {
id: 1,
date: '2021',
tst1: '111, 222',
tst2: 'AAA, BBB',
};
console.log(mapDuplicateProps(obj, ['tst1', 'tst2']));
Not sure if that's what you're searching for, but I tried making a more general use of what you try to do:
const duplicateProperties = obj => {
const properties = Object.entries(obj);
let acc = [{}];
properties.forEach(([key, value]) => {
if (typeof value === 'string' && value.includes(',')) {
const values = value.split(',');
values.forEach((v, i) => {
if (!acc[i]) {
acc[i] = {};
}
acc[i][key] = v.trim();
});
} else {
acc.forEach(o => o[key] = value);
}
});
return acc;
};
const obj = {
id: 1,
date: '2021',
tst1: '111, 222',
tst2: 'AAA, BBB',
};
console.log(duplicateProperties(obj));
You could start by determining the length of the result using Math.max(), String.split() etc.
Then you'd create an Array using Array.from(), returning the correct object for each value of the output index.
const obj = {
id: 1,
date: "2021",
tst1: "111, 222",
tst2: "AAA, BBB",
}
// Determine the length of our output array...
const length = Math.max(...Object.values(obj).map(s => (s + '').split(',').length))
// Map the object using the relevant index...
const result = Array.from({ length }, (_, idx) => {
return Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(obj).map(([key, value]) => {
const a = (value + '').split(/,\s*/);
return [key, a.length > 1 ? a[idx] : value ]
}))
})
console.log(result)
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; }
I receive a response like
[
{id:1,name:"type1-something"},
{id:2,name:"something-type2"},
{id:3,name:"type3-something"},
{id:4,name:"something-type1"}
]
and I have an Enum that contains all names from the response
enum E{
E1 = 'type1-something',
E2 = 'something-type2',
E3 = 'type3-something',
E4 = 'something-type1',
}
I need to group response by their names.
For example from the response above I need to transform it in
{
"Type1" : [{id:1,name:"type1-something"},{id:4,name:"something-type1"}],
"Type2" : [{id:2,name:"something-type2"}],
"Type3" : [{id:3,name:"type3-something"}],
}
What approach can be taken? I think of a map and a for loop
if (object.name == E1 || object.name == E4)
MAP['Type1'].push(object)
But I have over 30 entries in the enum and this will approach will become very big and hard to understand. Obviously I can reduce the amount of code by adding some smaller enums
that will include only their type, but I wonder if there is a more obvious way that I do not see
You could get the type and group by this value.
const
getType = ({ name }) => name
.match(/type\d+/g)
?.map(s => s[0].toUpperCase() + s.slice(1))
.join('-') || '',
data = [{ id: 1, name: "type1-something" }, { id: 2, name: "something-type2" }, { id: 3, name: "type3-something" }, { id: 4, name: "something-type1" }, { id: 5, name: "type3-type1-something" }],
result = data.reduce((r, o) => {
(r[getType(o)] ??= []).push(o);
return r;
}, {});
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
My brain froze with this advanced filtering. This task has exceeded my basic knowledge of filter, map etc.
Here I have an array with nested objects with array:
const DATA = [
{
title: 'Spongebob',
data: [
{ id: 1, name: 'Mr Crabs' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Sandy' }
]
},
{
title: 'Dragon Balls Z',
data: [
{ id: 1, name: 'GoKu' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Zamasu' }
]
}
];
You may have seen this sort of style if you've worked with React Native (RN). This question is not for RN. I need to perform a filter on the name property in the nested array and when I get a match, I must return the format as the DATA variable.
const handleFiltering = (value) => {
const _value = value.toLowerCase();
const results = DATA.map(o => {
return o.data.filter(o => o.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(_value) != -1)
});
console.log(results);
};
My limited knowledge of deep filtering returns the basic filtering for the data array but need to retain the structure for DATA. The expected results I'd expect:
// I'm now querying for "ZAMASU"
const handleFiltering = (value='ZAMA') => {
const _value = value.toLowerCase();
const results = DATA.map(o => {
return o.data.filter(o => o.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(_value) != -1)
});
// console.log(results) should now be
// [
// {
// title: 'Dragon Balls Z',
// data: [
// { id: 2, name: 'Zamasu' }
// ]
// }
// ];
};
What comes to mind is the use of {...DATA, something-here } but my brain has frozen as I need to get back the title property. How to achieve this, please?
Another solution would be first use filter to find only objects containing the name in data passed through the argument, subsequently mapping data.
Here is your adjusted filter method
const handleFiltering = (value) => {
const _value = value.toLowerCase();
const results = DATA.filter((obj) =>
obj.data.some((character) => character.name.toLowerCase() === _value)
).map((obj) => ({
title: obj.title,
data: obj.data.filter(
(character) => character.name.toLowerCase() === _value
),
}));
console.log(results);
};
You can use reduce method of array. First find out the object inside data array and then add that to accumulator array as new entry by preserving the original structure.
const DATA = [
{
title: 'Spongebob',
data: [
{ id: 1, name: 'Mr Crabs', where: 'tv' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Sandy' }
]
},
{
title: 'Dragon Balls Z',
data: [
{ id: 1, name: 'GoKu' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Zamasu' }
]
}
];
let handleFiltering = (value='tv') => {
return DATA.reduce((acc,d) => {
let obj = d.data.find(a => a.name?.toLowerCase().includes(value.toLowerCase())
|| a.where?.toLowerCase().includes(value.toLowerCase()));
obj ? acc.push({...d, data:[obj]}) : null;
return acc;
}, []);
}
let result = handleFiltering();
console.log(result);
I have an array which I need to combine with comma-separated of the same level and form a new array.
Input:
let arr = [
[{ LEVEL: 1, NAME: 'Mark' }, { LEVEL: 1, NAME: 'Adams' }, { LEVEL: 2, NAME: 'Robin' }],
[{ LEVEL: 3, NAME: 'Williams' }],
[{ LEVEL: 4, NAME: 'Matthew' }, { LEVEL: 4, NAME: 'Robert' }],
];
Output
[
[{ LEVEL: 1, NAME: 'Mark,Adams' }, { LEVEL: 2, NAME: 'Robin' }],
[{ LEVEL: 3, NAME: 'Williams' }],
[{ LEVEL: 4, NAME: 'Matthew,Robert' }],
];
I tried with the following code but not getting the correct result
let finalArr = [];
arr.forEach(o => {
let temp = finalArr.find(x => {
if (x && x.LEVEL === o.LEVEL) {
x.NAME += ', ' + o.NAME;
return true;
}
if (!temp) finalArr.push(o);
});
});
console.log(finalArr);
You could map the outer array and reduce the inner array by finding the same level and add NAME, if found. Otherwise create a new object.
var data = [[{ LEVEL: 1, NAME: "Mark" }, { LEVEL: 1, NAME: "Adams" }, { LEVEL: 2, NAME: "Robin"}], [{ LEVEL: 3, NAME: "Williams" }], [{ LEVEL: 4, NAME: "Matthew" }, { LEVEL: 4, NAME: "Robert" }]],
result = data.map(a => a.reduce((r, { LEVEL, NAME }) => {
var temp = r.find(q => q.LEVEL === LEVEL);
if (temp) temp.NAME += ',' + NAME;
else r.push({ LEVEL, NAME });
return r;
}, []));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
Assuming you only want to merge within the same array and not across arrays, and assuming there aren't all that many entries (e.g., fewer than several hundred thousand), the simple thing is to build a new array checking to see if it already has the same level in it:
let result = arr.map(entry => {
let newEntry = [];
for (const {LEVEL, NAME} of entry) {
const existing = newEntry.find(e => e.LEVEL === LEVEL);
if (existing) {
existing.NAME += "," + NAME;
} else {
newEntry.push({LEVEL, NAME});
}
}
return newEntry;
});
let arr= [
[{"LEVEL":1,"NAME":"Mark"},
{"LEVEL":1,"NAME":"Adams"},
{"LEVEL":2,"NAME":"Robin"} ],
[{"LEVEL":3,"NAME":"Williams"}],
[{"LEVEL":4,"NAME":"Matthew"},
{"LEVEL":4,"NAME":"Robert"}]
];
let result = arr.map(entry => {
let newEntry = [];
for (const {LEVEL, NAME} of entry) {
const existing = newEntry.find(e => e.LEVEL === LEVEL);
if (existing) {
existing.NAME += "," + NAME;
} else {
newEntry.push({LEVEL, NAME});
}
}
return newEntry;
});
console.log(result);
If the nested arrays can be truly massively long, you'd want to build a map rather than doing the linear search (.find) each time.
I'd try to do as much of this in constant time as possible.
var m = new Map();
array.forEach( refine.bind(m) );
function refine({ LABEL, NAME }) {
var o = this.get(NAME)
, has = !!o
, name = NAME
;
if (has) name = `${NAME}, ${o.NAME}`;
this.delete(NAME);
this.set(name, { NAME: name, LABEL });
}
var result = Array.from( m.values() );
I haven't tested this as I wrote it on my phone at the airport, but this should at least convey the approach I would advise.
EDIT
Well... looks like the question was edited... So... I'd recommend adding a check at the top of the function to see if it's an array and, if so, call refine with an early return. Something like:
var m = new Map();
array.forEach( refine.bind(m) );
function refine(item) {
var { LABEL, NAME } = item;
if (!NAME) return item.forEach( refine.bind(this) ); // assume array
var o = this.get(NAME)
, has = !!o
, name = NAME
;
if (has) name = `${NAME}, ${o.NAME}`;
this.delete(NAME);
this.set(name, { NAME: name, LABEL });
}
var result = Array.from( m.values() );
That way, it should work with both your original question and your edit.
EDIT
Looks like the question changed again... I give up.
Map the array values: every element to an intermediate object, then create the desired object from the resulting entries:
const basicArr = [
[{"LEVEL":1,"NAME":"Mark"},
{"LEVEL":1,"NAME":"Adams"},
{"LEVEL":2,"NAME":"Robin"} ],
[{"LEVEL":3,"NAME":"Williams"}],
[{"LEVEL":4,"NAME":"Matthew"},
{"LEVEL":4,"NAME":"Robert"}]
];
const leveled = basicArr.map( val => {
let obj = {};
val.forEach(v => {
obj[v.LEVEL] = obj[v.LEVEL] || {NAME: []};
obj[v.LEVEL].NAME = obj[v.LEVEL].NAME.concat(v.NAME);
});
return Object.entries(obj)
.map( ([key, val]) => ({LEVEL: +key, NAME: val.NAME.join(", ")}));
}
);
console.log(leveled);
.as-console-wrapper { top: 0; max-height: 100% !important; }
if you want to flatten all levels
const basicArr = [
[{"LEVEL":1,"NAME":"Mark"},
{"LEVEL":1,"NAME":"Adams"},
{"LEVEL":2,"NAME":"Robin"} ],
[{"LEVEL":3,"NAME":"Williams"}],
[{"LEVEL":4,"NAME":"Matthew"},
{"LEVEL":4,"NAME":"Robert"},
{"LEVEL":2,"NAME":"Cynthia"}],
[{"LEVEL":3,"NAME":"Jean"},
{"LEVEL":4,"NAME":"Martha"},
{"LEVEL":2,"NAME":"Jeff"}],
];
const leveled = basicArr.map( val => Object.entries (
val.reduce( (acc, val) => {
acc[val.LEVEL] = acc[val.LEVEL] || {NAME: []};
acc[val.LEVEL].NAME = acc[val.LEVEL].NAME.concat(val.NAME);
return acc;
}, {}))
.map( ([key, val]) => ({LEVEL: +key, NAME: val.NAME.join(", ")})) )
.flat() // (use .reduce((acc, val) => acc.concat(val), []) for IE/Edge)
.reduce( (acc, val) => {
const exists = acc.filter(x => x.LEVEL === val.LEVEL);
if (exists.length) {
exists[0].NAME = `${val.NAME}, ${exists.map(v => v.NAME).join(", ")}`;
return acc;
}
return [... acc, val];
}, [] );
console.log(leveled);
.as-console-wrapper { top: 0; max-height: 100% !important; }
ES6 way:
let say attributes is multidimensional array having multimple entries which need to combine like following:
let combinedArray = [];
attributes.map( attributes => {
combined = combinedArray.concat(...attributes);
});
I am able to find the object in the javascript below but it is pretty horrible and I am doing the find twice.
I'd be interested in a better way and one that did not involve lodash which I am current not using.
const statuses = [{
items: [{
id: 1,
name: 'foo'
}, {
id: 5,
name: 'bar'
}]
}, {
items: [{
id: 1,
name: 'mook'
}, {
id: 2,
name: 'none'
}, {
id: 3,
name: 'soot'
}]
}]
const selected = statuses.find(status => {
const none = status.items.find(alert => {
return alert.name === 'none';
});
return !!none;
});
console.log(selected)
const a = selected.items.find(s => s.name === 'none');
console.log(a)
You could use a nested some and find like this. This way you can skip the the operation once a match is found.
const statuses=[{items:[{id:1,name:'foo'},{id:5,name:'bar'}]},{items:[{id:1,name:'mook'},{id:2,name:'none'},{id:3,name:'soot'}]}];
let found;
statuses.some(a => {
const s = a.items.find(i => i.name === "none");
if (s) {
found = s;
return true
} else {
return false
}
})
console.log(found)
You could do something like this using map, concat and find. This is a bit slower but looks neater.
const statuses=[{items:[{id:1,name:'foo'},{id:5,name:'bar'}]},{items:[{id:1,name:'mook'},{id:2,name:'none'},{id:3,name:'soot'}]}]
const found = [].concat(...statuses.map(a => a.items))
.find(a => a.name === "none")
console.log(found)
Here's a jsperf comparing it with your code. The first one is the fastest.
You could combine all the status items into one array with reduce() and then you only have to find() once:
const statuses = [{
items: [{
id: 1,
name: 'foo'
}, {
id: 5,
name: 'bar'
}]
}, {
items: [{
id: 1,
name: 'mook'
}, {
id: 2,
name: 'none'
}, {
id: 3,
name: 'soot'
}]
}]
const theNones = statuses
.reduce(function(s, t) { return s.items.concat(t.items); })
.find(function(i) { return i.name === 'none'; });
console.log(theNones);
You could use flatMap and find:
Note: Array.prototype.flatMap is in Stage 3 and not part of the language yet but ships in most environments today (including Babel).
var arr = [{items:[{id:1,name:'foo'},{id:5,name:'bar'}]},{items:[{id:1,name:'mook'},{id:2,name:'none'},{id:3,name:'soot'}]}]
console.log(
arr
.flatMap(({ items }) => items)
.find(({
name
}) => name === 'none')
)
We could polyfill the flatting with concating (via map + reduce):
var arr = [{items:[{id:1,name:'foo'},{id:5,name:'bar'}]},{items:[{id:1,name:'mook'},{id:2,name:'none'},{id:3,name:'soot'}]}];
console.log(
arr
.map(({ items }) => items)
.reduce((items1, items2) => items1.concat(items2))
.find(({
name
}) => name === 'none')
)
You could also reduce the result:
var arr = [{items:[{id:1,name:'foo'},{id:5,name:'bar'}]},{items:[{id:1,name:'mook'},{id:2,name:'none'},{id:3,name:'soot'}]}]
console.log(
arr.reduce((result, {
items
}) =>
result ? result : items.find(({
name
}) => name === 'none'), null)
)
One reduce function (one iteration over everything), that returns an array of any object matching the criteria:
const [firstOne, ...others] = statuses.reduce((found, group) => found.concat(group.items.filter(item => item.name === 'none')), [])
I used destructuring to mimic your find idea, as you seem chiefly interested in the first one you come across. Because this iterates only once over each item, it is better than the alternative answers in terms of performance, but if you are really concerned for performance, then a for loop is your best bet, as the return will short-circuit the function and give you your value:
const findFirstMatchByName = (name) => {
for (let group of statuses) {
for (let item of group.items) {
if (item.name === name) {
return item
}
}
}
}
findFirstMatchByName('none')