I did a function to find string enumerations but i didn `t succeed to repeat it in a async way, i'm not getting any result:
const stringEnumerationsAsync = async (str) => {
let strChars = str.split("");
let enumerations = new Set();
const getEnumerations = (chars, enumertion) => {
return new Promise((resolve) => {
if (chars.length === 0) {
resolve(enumertion);
} else {
for (let i = 0; i < chars.length; i++) {
let newChars = [...chars];
let char = newChars.splice(i, 1);
let newEnumeration = enumertion + char;
getEnumerations(newChars, newEnumeration).then((finalEnumeration) => {
enumerations.add(finalEnumeration);
});
}
}
});
};
await getEnumerations(strChars, "");
return [...enumerations];
};
There are a few issues:
with getEnumerations(newChars, newEnumeration).then((finalEnumeration)... you seem to expect one enumeration from the recursive call, but you should expect one or more enumerations.
In fact, you are mixing up two patterns: one where you collect the result from (resolved) return values, and one where you collect them in a non-local variable. So if you go for the latter, you should not expect anything useful from the resolved value you get from the recursive call. Instead add enumerations to the non-local variable in the base case, and only there.
In the else block you don't call resolve, meaning that the new Promise never gets resolved.
You should actually not need to create a new Promise in the else case, as you will get promises from the recursive calls, and it is an anti-pattern to wrap that inside a promise constructor call back. So the if...else should be moved outside of new Promise
And then in the if case you would get an immediately resolving promise, because you call resolve immediately. In that case you might as well call Promise.resolve instead of new Promise.
Even more simple is to make getEnumerations an async function so that you only need to return the resolution value, and since we don't care about the resolution value,... well, we just need to return ;-)
So that brings us to this code:
const stringEnumerationsAsync = async (str) => {
let strChars = str.split("");
let enumerations = new Set();
const getEnumerations = async (chars, enumertion) => {
if (chars.length === 0) {
enumerations.add(enumertion);
} else {
for (let i = 0; i < chars.length; i++) {
let newChars = [...chars];
let char = newChars.splice(i, 1);
let newEnumeration = enumertion + char;
await getEnumerations(newChars, newEnumeration);
}
}
};
await getEnumerations(strChars, "");
return [...enumerations];
};
// demo
stringEnumerationsAsync("abc").then(console.log);
console.log("this is synchronous");
Related
I have a function where I form the current sum of elements. Getcoin is the method in my Api, and it works correctly if I console.log each element during the foreach cycle. But as the result I got nothing in the return and console.log function
getCurrentCost() {
let currentCostArr = [];
let sum = 0;
let existingEntries = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem("walletData"));
if (existingEntries == null) existingEntries = [];
existingEntries.forEach(el => {
this.coincapService
.getCoin(el.id)
.then((element) => {
currentCostArr.push(element.priceUsd * el.amount)
})
});
for (let i = 0; i < currentCostArr.length; i++) {
sum += +currentCostArr[i];
}
console.log('cevf c ' + sum)
console.log('current cost ' + currentCostArr)
return currentCostArr;
}
getCoin method
getCoin = async (id) => {
const coin = await this.getResource(`/assets/${id}`);
return this._transformCoin(coin);
}
The problem is that you are not handling correctly the Promise that .getCoin() returns inside the .forEach() 'loop'. It's making multiple calls to getCoin but the code outside the forEach is not awaiting these multiple async calls, so the next lines will execute without awaiting the result of the Promises. This is causing confusion in execution order logic of your code, behaving different than what you are expecting. Actually the function getCurrentCost() is ending before the Promises inside the loop resolves.
One way to solve your problem is replacing the .forEach() with .map(), which will return several Promises that will be awaited will Promise.all(), behaving the way it's expected.
//don't forget to turn the function async, so you can use await keyword.
async getCurrentCost() {
let sum = 0;
let existingEntries = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem("walletData"));
if (existingEntries == null) existingEntries = [];
await Promise.all(existingEntries.map(async (el) => {
const coin = await this.coincapService.getCoin(el.id)
currentCostArr.push(coin.priceUsd * coin.amount)
})
return currentCostArr
}
Your forEach loop pushes values in you array asynchronously.
You calculate the sum before you get your array filled up with values.
function haePosti(i) {
let postilup = fetch('http://localhost:8080/postit/' + i);
return postilup;
}
async function tekstiPosti() {
var luku = await muokkaaLuku();
var lupaukset = [];
var lupaukset2 = []
var postit = [];
var i = 0;
for (i = 1; i < luku; i++) {
lupaukset.push(haePosti(i));
}
Promise.all(lupaukset).then(()=>{
for (i = 0; i < luku; i++) {
console.log(lupaukset[i]);
lupaukset[i] = lupaukset[i].text().then(function(text) {
postit[i] = text.replace(/[^A-Za-z]+/g, '');
console.log(postit[i]);
});
}
}
);
return postit;
}
I have written an node API, from where I try to fetch() data and modify it. It all goes well until I have to start to alter the return value. In console it shows that it pushes the promises all normal to the array and even resolves them after promise.all() command, but when I try to start alter the values it either complains the following
the error
I am relatively new to the web programming and only few weeks fresh with node and js. Is there something obvious I am missing?
You're trying to use text on a promise, not the fulfillment value of the promise. You need to use the array that Promise.all provides as its fulfillment value, not lupaukset.
But there are some other problems:
You're not checking for HTTP success of your fetch calls (the fetch API footgun)
You're returning your postit array before it has anything in it, because it's filled in by the fulfillment handler of Promise.all but your function doesn't wait for that before returning
See comments:
async function haePosti(i){
const response = await fetch('http://localhost:8080/postit/'+i);
// Handle the `fetch` footgun
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error("HTTP error " + response.status);
}
// Request the text of the body
return response.text();
}
async function tekstiPosti(){
const luku = await muokkaaLuku();
var lupaukset = [];
for (let i = 0; i < luku; ++i) {
lupaukset.push(haePosti(i));
}
// Wait for the results
const postit = await Promise.all(lupaukset);
// Map them through your `replace` and return the result
return postit.map(text => text.replace(/[^A-Za-z]+/g, '');
}
I'd like to reuse the same code in a loop. This code contains promises. However, when iterating, this code results in an error.
I've tried using for and while loops. There seems to be no issue when I use the for loop for a single iteration.
Here is a minimal version of my code:
var search_url = /* Some initial URL */
var glued = "";
for(var i = 0; i < 2; i++)
{
const prom = request(search_url)
.then(function success(response /* An array from a XMLHTTPRequest*/) {
if (/* Some condition */)
{
search_url = /* Gets next URL */
glued += processQuery(response[0]);
} else {
console.log("Done.")
}
})
.catch(function failure(err) {
console.error(err.message); // TODO: do something w error
})
}
document.getElementById('api-content').textContent = glued;
I expect the results to append to the variable glued but instead, I get an error: failure Promise.catch (async) (anonymous) after the first iteration of the loop.
Answer:
You can use the Symbol.iterator in accordance with for await to perform asynchronous execution of your promises. This can be packaged up into a constructor, in the example case it's called Serial (because we're going through promises one by one, in order)
function Serial(promises = []) {
return {
promises,
resolved: [],
addPromise: function(fn) {
promises.push(fn);
},
resolve: async function(cb = i => i, err = (e) => console.log("trace: Serial.resolve " + e)) {
try {
for await (let p of this[Symbol.iterator]()) {}
return this.resolved.map(cb);
} catch (e) {
err(e);
}
},
[Symbol.iterator]: async function*() {
this.resolved = [];
for (let promise of this.promises) {
let p = await promise().catch(e => console.log("trace: Serial[Symbol.iterator] ::" + e));
this.resolved.push(p);
yield p;
}
}
}
}
What is the above?
It's a constructor called Serial.
It takes as an argument an array of Functions that return Promises.
The functions are stored in Serial.promises
It has an empty array stored in Serial.resolved - this will store the resolved promise requests.
It has two methods:
addPromise: Takes a Function that returns a Promise and adds it to Serial.promises
resolve: Asynchronously calls a custom Symbol.iterator. This iterator goes through every single promise, waits for it to be completed, and adds it to Serial.resolved. Once this is completed, it returns a map function that acts on the populated Serial.resolved array. This allows you to simply call resolve and then provide a callback of what to do with the array of responses. A.e. .resolve()((resolved_requests) => //do something with resolved_requests)
Why does it work?
Although many people don't realize this Symbol.iterator is much more powerful than standard for loops. This is for two big reasons.
The first reason, and the one that is applicable in this situation, is because it allows for asynchronous calls that can affect the state of the applied object.
The second reason is that it can be used to provide two different types of data from the same object. A.e. You may have an array that you would like to read the contents of:
let arr = [1,2,3,4];
You can use a for loop or forEach to get the data:
arr.forEach(v => console.log(v));
// 1, 2, 3, 4
But if you adjust the iterator:
arr[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
yield* this.map(v => v+1);
};
You get this:
arr.forEach(v => console.log(v));
// 1, 2, 3, 4
for(let v of arr) console.log(v);
// 2, 3, 4, 5
This is useful for many different reasons, including timestamping requests/mapping references, etc. If you'd like to know more please take a look at the ECMAScript Documentation: For in and For Of Statements
Use:
It can be used by calling the constructor with an Array of functions that return Promises. You can also add Function Promises to the Object by using
new Serial([])
.addPromise(() => fetch(url))
It doesn't run the Function Promises until you use the .resolve method.
This means that you can add promises ad hoc if you'd like before you do anything with the asynchronous calls. A.e. These two are the same:
With addPromise:
let promises = new Serial([() => fetch(url), () => fetch(url2), () => fetch(url3)]);
promises.addPromise(() => fetch(url4));
promises.resolve().then((responses) => responses)
Without addPromise:
let promises = new Serial([() => fetch(url), () => fetch(url2), () => fetch(url3), () => fetch(url4)])
.resolve().then((responses) => responses)
Data:
Since I can't really replicate your data calls, I opted for JSONPlaceholder (a fake online rest api) to show the promise requests in action.
The data looks like this:
let searchURLs = ["https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1",
"https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/2",
"https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/3"]
//since our constructor takes functions that return promises, I map over the URLS:
.map(url => () => fetch(url));
To get the responses we can call the above data using our constructor:
let promises = new Serial(searchURLS)
.resolve()
.then((resolved_array) => console.log(resolved_array));
Our resolved_array gives us an array of XHR Response Objects. You can see that here:
function Serial(promises = []) {
return {
promises,
resolved: [],
addPromise: function(fn) {
promises.push(fn);
},
resolve: async function(cb = i => i, err = (e) => console.log("trace: Serial.resolve " + e)) {
try {
for await (let p of this[Symbol.iterator]()) {}
return this.resolved.map(cb);
} catch (e) {
err(e);
}
},
[Symbol.iterator]: async function*() {
this.resolved = [];
for (let promise of this.promises) {
let p = await promise().catch(e => console.log("trace: Serial[Symbol.iterator] ::" + e));
this.resolved.push(p);
yield p;
}
}
}
}
let searchURLs = ["https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1", "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/2", "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/3"].map(url => () => fetch(url));
let promises = new Serial(searchURLs).resolve().then((resolved_array) => console.log(resolved_array));
Getting Results to Screen:
I opted to use a closure function to simply add text to an output HTMLElement.
This is added like this:
HTML:
<output></output>
JS:
let output = ((selector) => (text) => document.querySelector(selector).textContent += text)("output");
Putting it together:
If we use the output snippet along with our Serial object the final functional code looks like this:
let promises = new Serial(searchURLs).resolve()
.then((resolved) => resolved.map(response =>
response.json()
.then(obj => output(obj.title))));
What's happening above is this:
we input all our functions that return promises. new Serial(searchURLS)
we tell it to resolve all the requests .resolve()
after it resolves all the requests, we tell it to take the requests and map the array .then(resolved => resolved.map
the responses we turn to objects by using .json method. This is necessary for JSON, but may not be necessary for you
after this is done, we use .then(obj => to tell it to do something with each computed response
we output the title to the screen using output(obj.title)
Result:
let output = ((selector) => (text) => document.querySelector(selector).textContent += text)("output");
function Serial(promises = []) {
return {
promises,
resolved: [],
addPromise: function(fn) {
promises.push(fn);
},
resolve: async function(cb = i => i, err = (e) => console.log("trace: Serial.resolve " + e)) {
try {
for await (let p of this[Symbol.iterator]()) {}
return this.resolved.map(cb);
} catch (e) {
err(e);
}
},
[Symbol.iterator]: async function*() {
this.resolved = [];
for (let promise of this.promises) {
let p = await promise().catch(e => console.log("trace: Serial[Symbol.iterator] ::" + e));
this.resolved.push(p);
yield p;
}
}
}
}
let searchURLs = ["https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1", "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/2", "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/3"].map(url => () => fetch(url));
let promises = new Serial(searchURLs).resolve()
.then((resolved) => resolved.map(response =>
response.json()
.then(obj => output(obj.title))));
<output></output>
Why go this route?
It's reusable, functional, and if you import the Serial Constructor you can keep your code slim and comprehensible. If this is a cornerstone of your code, it'll be easy to maintain and use.
Using it with your code:
I will add how to specifically use this with your code to fully answer your question and so that you may understand further.
NOTE glued will be populated with the requested data, but it's unnecessary. I left it in because you may have wanted it stored for a reason outside the scope of your question and I don't want to make assumptions.
//setup urls:
var search_urls = ["https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1", "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/2"];
var request = (url) => () => fetch(url);
let my_requests = new Serial(search_urls.map(request));
//setup glued (you don't really need to, but if for some reason you want the info stored...
var glued = "";
//setup helper function to grab title(this is necessary for my specific data)
var addTitle = (req) => req.json().then(obj => (glued += obj.title, document.getElementById('api-content').textContent = glued));
// put it all together:
my_requests.resolve().then(requests => requests.map(addTitle));
Using it with your code - Working Example:
function Serial(promises = []) {
return {
promises,
resolved: [],
addPromise: function(fn) {
promises.push(fn);
},
resolve: async function(cb = i => i, err = (e) => console.log("trace: Serial.resolve " + e)) {
try {
for await (let p of this[Symbol.iterator]()) {}
return this.resolved.map(cb);
} catch (e) {
err(e);
}
},
[Symbol.iterator]: async function*() {
this.resolved = [];
for (let promise of this.promises) {
let p = await promise().catch(e => console.log("trace: Serial[Symbol.iterator] ::" + e));
this.resolved.push(p);
yield p;
}
}
}
}
//setup urls:
var search_urls = ["https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1", "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/2"];
var request = (url) => () => fetch(url);
let my_requests = new Serial(search_urls.map(request));
//setup glued (you don't really need to, but if for some reason you want the info stored...
var glued = "";
//setup helper function to grab title(this is necessary for my specific data)
var addTitle = (req) => req.json().then(obj => (glued += obj.title, document.getElementById('api-content').textContent = glued));
// put it all together:
my_requests.resolve().then(requests => requests.map(addTitle));
<div id="api-content"></div>
Final Note
It's likely that we will be seeing a prototypal change to the Promise object in the future that allows for easy serialization of Promises. Currently (7/15/19) there is a TC39 Proposal that does add a lot of functionality to the Promise object but it hasn't been fully vetted yet, and as with many ideas trapped within the Proposal stage, it's almost impossible to tell when they will be implemented into Browsers, or even if the idea will stagnate and fall off the radar.
Until then workarounds like this are necessary and useful( the reason why I even went through the motions of constructing this Serializer object was for a transpiler I wrote in Node, but it's been very helpful beyond that! ) but do keep an eye out for any changes because you never know!
Hope this helps! Happy Coding!
Your best bet is probably going to be building up that glued variable with recursion.
Here's an example using recursion with a callback function:
var glued = "";
requestRecursively(/* Some initial URL string */, function() {
document.getElementById('api-content').textContent = glued;
});
function requestRecursively(url, cb) {
request(url).then(function (response) {
if (/* Some condition */) {
glued += processQuery(response[0]);
var next = /* Gets next URL string */;
if (next) {
// There's another URL. Make another request.
requestRecursively(next, cb);
} else {
// We're done. Invoke the callback;
cb();
}
} else {
console.log("Done.");
}
}).catch(function (err) {
console.error(err.message);
});
}
I'm developing a Dapp based on Ethereum and I got stuck with Promises.
In the for loop, the elements of the array have to be verified one by one. This happens at the validateRow() function, which returns a Promise at first. The Promise will be resolved to a number (0, when the element is valid; 1, 2 or 3, when it is not valid).
In the end, I would like to return a resultList[], which is an array of objects. Each object should have two properties:
row, containing the element (a string),
and result, which tells whether it is valid.
However, the resultList[] only contains the rows in the end, while the 'then' branch only holds the results ({"row":"","result":"0"}). I added the logs which are printed in the console as comments. Unfortunately, I can't figure out, how I could put the two together.
var resultList = [];
for (var i = 0; i < App.resultArray.length; i++) {
var promiseReturned = contractInstance.validateRow.call(App.resultId, App.resultArray[i]);
console.log(promiseReturned); //Promise {<pending>}
var rowObject = new Object();
console.log(App.resultArray[i]); //row1string
rowObject.row = App.resultArray[i];
promiseReturned.then(function(returnVal) {
console.log("the returnVal: " + returnVal); //the returnVal: 1
rowObject.result = returnVal;
console.log("the rowObject :" + JSON.stringify(rowObject)); //{"row":"","result":"0"}
return returnVal;
});
resultList.push(rowObject);
};
console.log(resultList); //[{"row":"row1string"},{"row": "row2string"}]
return resultList;
In Javascript, use forward slashes to denote comments, not backslashes, else you'll get syntax errors.
Use Promise.all to wait for all promises to be resolved before returning the object:
async function getResultList() {
const allPromises = App.resultArray.map((row) => (
contractInstance.validateRow.call(App.resultId, row)
.then(result => ({ result, row }))
));
const resultList = await Promise.all(allPromises);
return resultList; // This will return a Promise to the caller of getResultList
}
Note that you'll have to consume getResultList as a promise, since it doesn't run synchronously. eg
const resultList = await getResultList();
For completeness, CertainPerformance's answer but using async/await, and rewritten more concisely:
async function getResultList() {
return await Promise.all(
App.resultArray.map(async (row) => {
const result = await contractInstance.validateRow.call(App.resultId, row);
return {
row,
result,
};
})
);
}
i want to perform synchronous operation of functions using promise. I have loop that passes the data to be inserted to insert function and after inserting one row i want to check the no. of rows exists in table hence i am performing select operation.
But the issue is if there are 3 records then it inserts all 3 records and after that my select function gets executed. what i want is after insertion of one record select function gets called.
here is my pseudo code as entire code involves lot of operations
for(var i=0; data.length ; i++){
self.executeFeedbackTrack(data);
}
executeFeedbackTrack:function(callInfo){
var self=this;
return self.insertFeedbackTrack(callInfo).then(function(data){
console.log("insertFeedbackTrack status "+status);
return self.getFeedbackTrack();
});
},
getFeedbackTrack :function(){
return new Promise(function(resolve,reject){
var objDBFeedbackTrack = new DBFeedbackTrack();
objDBFeedbackTrack.selectFeedbackTrack(function(arrayCallRegisters){
if(arrayCallRegisters){
console.log("notification.js no. of feedbacks "+arrayCallRegisters.length);
resolve(arrayCallRegisters.length);
}
});
});
},
insertFeedbackTrack :function(callInfo){
return new Promise(function(resolve,reject){
var objDBFeedbackTrack = new DBFeedbackTrack();
objDBFeedbackTrack.insertFeedbackTrack(callInfo.callNumber,callInfo.callServiceType,function(status){
resolve(status);
$('#loader').hide();
});
});
}
The previous answer is good, but if you are using nodejs, or babel, or you are using only modern browsers. You can use an async-await pair, it is es8 stuff.
let insertFeedbackTrack = function(){ return new Promise(/***/)};
let getFeedbackTrack = function(){ return new Promise(/***/)};
let processResult = async function(data){
let feedbacks = [];
for(let i=0;i<data.length;i++){
let insertedResult = await insertFeedbackTrack(data[i]);//perhaps you will return an id;
let feedbackTrack = await getFeedbackTrack(insertedResult.id);
feedbacks.push(feedbackTrack);
}
return feedbacks;
}
processResult(data).then(/** do stuff */)
It looks to me like this is caused by executing a series of asynchronous inserts, and assuming that the get of insert n (inside of a .then()) is called before insert n+1 is executed. However, I'm not aware of any such guarantee, in JavaScript; all that I'm familiar with is that then n will be called after insert n, not that it would be called before insert n+1.
What I'd suggest is avoiding this mix of traditional and callback-based code, and instead put the iteration step inside getFeedbackTrack().then. Assuming this understanding of the issue is correct, then something like the following should work:
function iterate(i) {
if (i < data.length) {
obj.insertFeedbackTrack(data[i]).then(function(insertResult) {
self.getFeedbackTrack().then(function(getResult) {
// this line is the important one, replacing the `for` loop earlier
iterate(i+1);
});
});
}
}
iterate(0);
By doing that, you would guarantee that insert for the next element does not occur until the current select executes successfully.
Naturally, you may also want to restructure that to use chained .then instead of nested; I used nested rather than chained to emphasize the ordering of callbacks.
This can be solved by using a very handy JS library Ramda. Concept is to use two methods, one is R.partial and another is R.pipeP.
First create a promises array from your data array, like following.
var promises = data.map(function(i) {
return R.partial(sample, [i])
});
Then you can pass this promise to R.pipeP, so that it can be executed one after another. like below.
var doOperation = R.pipeP.apply(this, promises)
Please execute following snippet attached.
// Sample promise returning function
function sample(d) {
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
setTimeout(function() {
console.log('resolved for:' + d);
resolve(d);
}, 1000)
})
}
// Sample data
var data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
// Converting data array to promise array
var promises = data.map(function(i) {
return R.partial(sample, [i])
});
var doOperation = R.pipeP.apply(this, promises)
doOperation();
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
So in your case, the code will look like this
var promises = data.map(function(i) {
return R.partial(self.executeFeedbackTrack, [i])
});
var doOperation = R.pipeP.apply(this, promises)
doOperation();
I use yield for such cases if using generator functions.
for(var i = 0; i < order.tasks.length; i++){
if(order.tasks[i].customer_id === 0){
var name = order.tasks[i].customer_name.split(" ")
const customers = yield db.queryAsync(
`INSERT INTO customers(
business_id)
VALUES(?)
`,[order.business_id])
}
}
Or else I use self-calling functions in case of callbacks.
var i = 0;
(function loop() {
if (i < data.length) {
task_ids1.push([order.tasks[i].task_id])
i++;
loop();
}
}());
Here's how I would sequentially call promises in a loop (I'm using ES7).
First, let's define some basic data:
const data = [0,1,2,3];
Then, let's simulate some long running process, so let's create a function that returns a Promise (you can think of this as a simulated network request, or whatever suits your needs)
const promiseExample = (item) =>
new Promise((res) => {
setTimeout(() => {
console.log('resolved ', item);
res(item);
}, 1000);
});
Now, let's create an array of promises. What the next line of code does is: for every item in the array data, return a promise factory. A promise factory is a function that wraps a certain promise without running it.
const funcs = data.map(item => async () => await promiseExample(item));
Now, the actual code starts here. We need a function that does the actual serialization. Since it has to handle an array of promiseFactories, I split it in two functions, one for the serialization of a single promise, and one for handling an array of promiseFactories.
const serializePromise = promiseFactoryList =>
promiseFactoryList.reduce(serialize, Promise.resolve([]));
const serialize = async (promise, promiseFactory) => {
const promiseResult = await promise;
const res = await promiseFactory();
return [...promiseResult, res];
};
Now, you can simply call it like this:
serializePromise(funcs).then(res => {
console.log('res', res);
});
As you can see, the code is pretty simple, elegant, functional, and doesn't need any external dependency. I hope this answers your question and helps you!
const serializePromise = promiseFactoryList =>
promiseFactoryList.reduce(serialize, Promise.resolve([]));
const serialize = async (promise, promiseFactory) => {
const promiseResult = await promise;
const res = await promiseFactory();
return [...promiseResult, res];
};
const data = [0,1,2,3];
const promiseExample = (item) =>
new Promise((res) => {
setTimeout(() => {
console.log('resolved ', item);
res(item);
}, 1000);
});
const funcs = data.map(item => async () => await promiseExample(item))
serializePromise(funcs).then(res => {
console.log('res', res);
});
I ran into this problem recently and solved it as shown below. This is very similar to the answer by #Ethan Kaminsky, but only uses callbacks. This may be useful for people avoiding promises for whatever reason.
In my application the asynchronous function may fail and can safely be retried; I included this logic because it's useful and doesn't overly complicate the routine, but it is not exercised in the example.
// Some callback when the task is complete
function cb(...rest) { window.alert( `${rest.join(', ')}` ) }
// The data and the function operating on the data
// The function calls "callback(err)" on completion
const data = [ 'dataset1', 'dataset2', 'dataset3' ]
const doTheThing = (thingDone) => setTimeout( thingDone, 1000 )
let i = -1 // counter/interator for data[]
let retries = 20 // everything fails; total retry #
// The do-async-synchronously (with max retries) loop
function next( err ) {
if( err ) {
if( ! --retries ) return cb( 'too many retries' )
} else if( ! data[++i] ) return cb( undefined, 'done-data' )
console.log( 'i is', i, data[i] )
doTheThing( next, data[i] ) // callback is first here
}
// start the process
next()