We Keep Coding

I try to use const useStyles in class component

Now, I doing a project with React Framework and Material-UI's library.
My templates from https://material-ui.com/getting-started/templates/ --> Sing In
I change component from function component to class component to use this.state. Because I want get values from keyboard. But I can't.
It's error
enter image description here
this is my code
const useStyles = makeStyles(theme => ({
root: {
flexGrow: 1,
},
}));
class Signin extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
username: "",
password: "",
redirectToReferrer: false,
message: null
}
}
render() {
const { redirectToReferrer } = this.state;
const { classes } = this.props;
if (redirectToReferrer) return <Redirect to="/routebasic" />;
return (
<div className={classes.root}>
}}
Signin.propTypes = {
classes: PropTypes.object.isRequired,
};
export default [connect(null, { ActSignin })(Signin),makeStyles(useStyles)(Signin)];
When I edit export default to
export default makeStyles(useStyles)(Signin);
It's still error.

Yes, it will error. There are (very hacky) ways to get hooks to work with classes, but you don't need to use a class just so that you can have state. It's much easier to just use a function component rather than trying to hack React.
I change component from function component to class component to use this.state. Because I want get values from keyboard.
As an example (I'm guessing here, because I don't know the context, and I've split out the object rather than keeping it as a single value):
const Signin = ({ classes }) => {
const [username, setUsername] = React.useState("kmitlclinic01");
const [password, setPassword] = React.useState("54788");
const [redirectToReferrer, setRedirectToReferrer] = React.useState(false);
const [message, setMessage] = React.useState("kmitlclinic01");
if (redirectToReferrer) return <Redirect to="/routebasic" />;
return (
<div className={classes.root}>
{/* I assume some stuff goes here? */}
</div>
);
}
export default [connect(null, { ActSignin })(Signin),makeStyles(useStyles)(Signin)];

Table Component is not re-rendered after state update

i'm having a table component for displaying some data. After dispatching an action the table data in the state are channging. However my table component is not updated. It is updated only when i click on another radio button in another row of my table. I want my component to rerender when the data are changed. Here is my code:
const mapStateToProps = state => ({
evaluationData: evaluationResultsSelector(state)
});
const mapDispatchToProps = dispatch => ({
setSelectedEvaluationRecord: record =>
dispatch(setSelectedEvaluationRecord(record))
});
export default connect(mapStateToProps,
mapDispatchToProps
EvaluationDataTable,
);
and my component is this:
import React from 'react';
import Table from 'antd/lib/table';
import 'antd/lib/table/style/css';
import "antd/dist/antd.css";
import { columnEvaluation } from './evaluationDataStructure';
class EvaluationDataTable extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
selectedRowKeys: [0], // Check here to configure the default column
};
}
// shouldComponentUpdate(prevProps, prevState) {
// return (prevProps.results !== this.props.results || prevState.selectedRowKeys !== this.state.selectedRowKeys);
// }
onRowChange = selectedRowKeys => {
if (selectedRowKeys.length > 1) {
const lastSelectedRowIndex = [...selectedRowKeys].pop();
this.setState({ selectedRowKeys: lastSelectedRowIndex });
}
this.setState({ selectedRowKeys });
};
onRowSelect = (record) => {
this.props.setSelectedEvaluationRecord(record)
};
render() {
const { selectedRowKeys } = this.state;
const rowSelection = {
type: 'radio',
selectedRowKeys,
onChange: this.onRowChange,
onSelect: this.onRowSelect
};
return (
<React.Fragment>
<div style={{ marginBottom: 16 }} />
<Table
rowSelection={rowSelection}
columns={columnEvaluation}
dataSource={this.props.evaluationData}
/>
</React.Fragment>
);
}
}
export default EvaluationDataTable;
When i click in another row the table is rerendered as my setState is triggered but when the data are channged the table is not rerendered. Only when i click in another row. How to deal with it? Thanks a lot
Also my reducer which mutates the table is this:
case ACTION_TYPES.EDIT_EVALUATION_RESULTS: {
const evaluationResults = state.evaluationResults;
const editedRecord = action.payload.editedEvaluationData;
evaluationResults.forEach((item, i) => {
if (item.id === editedRecord.id) {
evaluationResults[i] = editedRecord;
}
});
return {
...state,
evaluationResults
};
}

Problem was here as OP has already deduced.
const evaluationResults = state.evaluationResults;
This was causing a state-mutation which goes against Redux principles. Although the state values were being updated in OP's proceeding code, the changes were being made to the same, initial object in reference. Redux does not register it as a new-state so it found no need to re-render our component. To get your connected-component to re-render we need a completely new redux-state.
To achieve this, we need to create a brand-new copy of evaluationResults like so and then the OP's feature will work as expected:
const evaluationResults = [...state.evaluationResults];

Calling an internal component method externally using React.Children

I've created a validation function that I can call externally like so:
const isValid = validateChildren(this.props.children)
And I have a component I'd like to validate.
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
}
isValid() {
// Validation will check against the render method in this component.
return true;
}
render() {
return false;
}
}
Within that function I'm using the component props to check for a validation function using React.Children. This looks something like this:
React.Children.map(children, (child) => {
// Validation here.
});
What I'd like to do in addition to checking for props, is to check for a internal class method of isValid and then fire it. That way in the case of MyComponent I could do the following:
if (child.current.isValid) child.current.isValid()
Is something like this possible in React? I'm trying to solve a performance issue with cloning the child elements that I'd like to avoid with this approach.

You can do this using forwardRef and the useImperativeHandle hook, as described here.
If you change the name in the App function, you'll see the validity change.
import React, { useState, useImperativeHandle, useRef, useEffect } from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
const validateNameProp = nameProp => {
return nameProp === "Colin";
};
let Child = ({ name, childRef }) => {
const [nameIsValid, setNameIsValid] = useState(false);
// We want to expose the isValid function so it can be called by parent.
useImperativeHandle(childRef, () => ({
isValid
}));
const isValid = () => {
setNameIsValid(true);
};
return (
<div ref={childRef}>
<h1>
Name is {name} and this name is: {nameIsValid ? "valid" : "invalid"}
</h1>
</div>
);
};
const App = () => {
const childRef = useRef();
const name = "Colin";
// Wait until component mounts so ref is not null.
useEffect(() => {
if (validateNameProp(name)) {
childRef.current.isValid();
}
}, []);
return <Child childRef={childRef} name={name} />;
};
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);

React Context API and avoiding re-renders

I have updated this with an update at the bottom
Is there a way to maintain a monolithic root state (like Redux) with multiple Context API Consumers working on their own part of their Provider value without triggering a re-render on every isolated change?
Having already read through this related question and tried some variations to test out some of the insights provided there, I am still confused about how to avoid re-renders.
Complete code is below and online here: https://codesandbox.io/s/504qzw02nl
The issue is that according to devtools, every component sees an "update" (a re-render), even though SectionB is the only component that sees any render changes and even though b is the only part of the state tree that changes. I've tried this with functional components and with PureComponent and see the same render thrashing.
Because nothing is being passed as props (at the component level) I can't see how to detect or prevent this. In this case, I am passing the entire app state into the provider, but I've also tried passing in fragments of the state tree and see the same problem. Clearly, I am doing something very wrong.
import React, { Component, createContext } from 'react';
const defaultState = {
a: { x: 1, y: 2, z: 3 },
b: { x: 4, y: 5, z: 6 },
incrementBX: () => { }
};
let Context = createContext(defaultState);
class App extends Component {
constructor(...args) {
super(...args);
this.state = {
...defaultState,
incrementBX: this.incrementBX.bind(this)
}
}
incrementBX() {
let { b } = this.state;
let newB = { ...b, x: b.x + 1 };
this.setState({ b: newB });
}
render() {
return (
<Context.Provider value={this.state}>
<SectionA />
<SectionB />
<SectionC />
</Context.Provider>
);
}
}
export default App;
class SectionA extends Component {
render() {
return (<Context.Consumer>{
({ a }) => <div>{a.x}</div>
}</Context.Consumer>);
}
}
class SectionB extends Component {
render() {
return (<Context.Consumer>{
({ b }) => <div>{b.x}</div>
}</Context.Consumer>);
}
}
class SectionC extends Component {
render() {
return (<Context.Consumer>{
({ incrementBX }) => <button onClick={incrementBX}>Increment a x</button>
}</Context.Consumer>);
}
}
Edit: I understand that there may be a bug in the way react-devtools detects or displays re-renders. I've expanded on my code above in a way that displays the problem. I now cannot tell if what I am doing is actually causing re-renders or not. Based on what I've read from Dan Abramov, I think I'm using Provider and Consumer correctly, but I cannot definitively tell if that's true. I welcome any insights.

There are some ways to avoid re-renders, also make your state management "redux-like". I will show you how I've been doing, it far from being a redux, because redux offer so many functionalities that aren't so trivial to implement, like the ability to dispatch actions to any reducer from any actions or the combineReducers and so many others.
Create your reducer
export const initialState = {
...
};
export const reducer = (state, action) => {
...
};
Create your ContextProvider component
export const AppContext = React.createContext({someDefaultValue})
export function ContextProvider(props) {
const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(reducer, initialState)
const context = {
someValue: state.someValue,
someOtherValue: state.someOtherValue,
setSomeValue: input => dispatch('something'),
}
return (
<AppContext.Provider value={context}>
{props.children}
</AppContext.Provider>
);
}
Use your ContextProvider at top level of your App, or where you want it
function App(props) {
...
return(
<AppContext>
...
</AppContext>
)
}
Write components as pure functional component
This way they will only re-render when those specific dependencies update with new values
const MyComponent = React.memo(({
somePropFromContext,
setSomePropFromContext,
otherPropFromContext,
someRegularPropNotFromContext,
}) => {
... // regular component logic
return(
... // regular component return
)
});
Have a function to select props from context (like redux map...)
function select(){
const { someValue, otherValue, setSomeValue } = useContext(AppContext);
return {
somePropFromContext: someValue,
setSomePropFromContext: setSomeValue,
otherPropFromContext: otherValue,
}
}
Write a connectToContext HOC
function connectToContext(WrappedComponent, select){
return function(props){
const selectors = select();
return <WrappedComponent {...selectors} {...props}/>
}
}
Put it all together
import connectToContext from ...
import AppContext from ...
const MyComponent = React.memo(...
...
)
function select(){
...
}
export default connectToContext(MyComponent, select)
Usage
<MyComponent someRegularPropNotFromContext={something} />
//inside MyComponent:
...
<button onClick={input => setSomeValueFromContext(input)}>...
...
Demo that I did on other StackOverflow question
Demo on codesandbox
The re-render avoided
MyComponent will re-render only if the specifics props from context updates with a new value, else it will stay there.
The code inside select will run every time any value from context updates, but it does nothing and is cheap.
Other solutions
I suggest check this out Preventing rerenders with React.memo and useContext hook.

I made a proof of concept on how to benefit from React.Context, but avoid re-rendering children that consume the context object. The solution makes use of React.useRef and CustomEvent. Whenever you change count or lang, only the component consuming the specific proprety gets updated.
Check it out below, or try the CodeSandbox
index.tsx
import * as React from 'react'
import {render} from 'react-dom'
import {CountProvider, useDispatch, useState} from './count-context'
function useConsume(prop: 'lang' | 'count') {
const contextState = useState()
const [state, setState] = React.useState(contextState[prop])
const listener = (e: CustomEvent) => {
if (e.detail && prop in e.detail) {
setState(e.detail[prop])
}
}
React.useEffect(() => {
document.addEventListener('update', listener)
return () => {
document.removeEventListener('update', listener)
}
}, [state])
return state
}
function CountDisplay() {
const count = useConsume('count')
console.log('CountDisplay()', count)
return (
<div>
{`The current count is ${count}`}
<br />
</div>
)
}
function LangDisplay() {
const lang = useConsume('lang')
console.log('LangDisplay()', lang)
return <div>{`The lang count is ${lang}`}</div>
}
function Counter() {
const dispatch = useDispatch()
return (
<button onClick={() => dispatch({type: 'increment'})}>
Increment count
</button>
)
}
function ChangeLang() {
const dispatch = useDispatch()
return <button onClick={() => dispatch({type: 'switch'})}>Switch</button>
}
function App() {
return (
<CountProvider>
<CountDisplay />
<LangDisplay />
<Counter />
<ChangeLang />
</CountProvider>
)
}
const rootElement = document.getElementById('root')
render(<App />, rootElement)
count-context.tsx
import * as React from 'react'
type Action = {type: 'increment'} | {type: 'decrement'} | {type: 'switch'}
type Dispatch = (action: Action) => void
type State = {count: number; lang: string}
type CountProviderProps = {children: React.ReactNode}
const CountStateContext = React.createContext<State | undefined>(undefined)
const CountDispatchContext = React.createContext<Dispatch | undefined>(
undefined,
)
function countReducer(state: State, action: Action) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'increment': {
return {...state, count: state.count + 1}
}
case 'switch': {
return {...state, lang: state.lang === 'en' ? 'ro' : 'en'}
}
default: {
throw new Error(`Unhandled action type: ${action.type}`)
}
}
}
function CountProvider({children}: CountProviderProps) {
const [state, dispatch] = React.useReducer(countReducer, {
count: 0,
lang: 'en',
})
const stateRef = React.useRef(state)
React.useEffect(() => {
const customEvent = new CustomEvent('update', {
detail: {count: state.count},
})
document.dispatchEvent(customEvent)
}, [state.count])
React.useEffect(() => {
const customEvent = new CustomEvent('update', {
detail: {lang: state.lang},
})
document.dispatchEvent(customEvent)
}, [state.lang])
return (
<CountStateContext.Provider value={stateRef.current}>
<CountDispatchContext.Provider value={dispatch}>
{children}
</CountDispatchContext.Provider>
</CountStateContext.Provider>
)
}
function useState() {
const context = React.useContext(CountStateContext)
if (context === undefined) {
throw new Error('useCount must be used within a CountProvider')
}
return context
}
function useDispatch() {
const context = React.useContext(CountDispatchContext)
if (context === undefined) {
throw new Error('useDispatch must be used within a AccountProvider')
}
return context
}
export {CountProvider, useState, useDispatch}

To my understanding, the context API is not meant to avoid re-render but is more like Redux. If you wish to avoid re-render, perhaps looks into PureComponent or lifecycle hook shouldComponentUpdate.
Here is a great link to improve performance, you can apply the same to the context API too

How to pass in an instance variable from a React component to its HOC?

I typically use component composition to reuse logic the React way. For example, here is a simplified version on how I would add interaction logic to a component. In this case I would make CanvasElement selectable:
CanvasElement.js
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import Selectable from './Selectable'
import './CanvasElement.css'
export default class CanvasElement extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.state = {
selected: false
}
this.interactionElRef = React.createRef()
}
onSelected = (selected) => {
this.setState({ selected})
}
render() {
return (
<Selectable
iElRef={this.interactionElRef}
onSelected={this.onSelected}>
<div ref={this.interactionElRef} className={'canvas-element ' + (this.state.selected ? 'selected' : '')}>
Select me
</div>
</Selectable>
)
}
}
Selectable.js
import { Component } from 'react'
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'
export default class Selectable extends Component {
static propTypes = {
iElRef: PropTypes.shape({
current: PropTypes.instanceOf(Element)
}).isRequired,
onSelected: PropTypes.func.isRequired
}
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.state = {
selected: false
}
}
onClick = (e) => {
const selected = !this.state.selected
this.setState({ selected })
this.props.onSelected(selected)
}
componentDidMount() {
this.props.iElRef.current.addEventListener('click', this.onClick)
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this.props.iElRef.current.removeEventListener('click', this.onClick)
}
render() {
return this.props.children
}
}
Works well enough. The Selectable wrapper does not need to create a new div because its parent provides it with a reference to another element that is to become selectable.
However, I've been recommended on numerous occasions to stop using such Wrapper composition and instead achieve reusability through Higher Order Components. Willing to experiment with HoCs, I gave it a try but did not come further than this:
CanvasElement.js
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import Selectable from '../enhancers/Selectable'
import flow from 'lodash.flow'
import './CanvasElement.css'
class CanvasElement extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.interactionElRef = React.createRef()
}
render() {
return (
<div ref={this.interactionElRef}>
Select me
</div>
)
}
}
export default flow(
Selectable()
)(CanvasElement)
Selectable.js
import React, { Component } from 'react'
export default function makeSelectable() {
return function decorateComponent(WrappedComponent) {
return class Selectable extends Component {
componentDidMount() {
// attach to interaction element reference here
}
render() {
return (
<WrappedComponent {...this.props} />
)
}
}
}
}
The problem is that there appears to be no obvious way to connect the enhanced component's reference (an instance variable) to the higher order component (the enhancer).
How would I "pass in" the instance variable (the interactionElRef) from the CanvasElement to its HOC?

I came up with a different strategy. It acts roughly like the Redux connect function, providing props that the wrapped component isn't responsible for creating, but the child is responsible for using them as they see fit:
CanvasElement.js
import React, { Component } from "react";
import makeSelectable from "./Selectable";
class CanvasElement extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
render() {
const { onClick, selected } = this.props;
return <div onClick={onClick}>{`Selected: ${selected}`}</div>;
}
}
CanvasElement.propTypes = {
onClick: PropTypes.func,
selected: PropTypes.bool,
};
CanvasElement.defaultProps = {
onClick: () => {},
selected: false,
};
export default makeSelectable()(CanvasElement);
Selectable.js
import React, { Component } from "react";
export default makeSelectable = () => WrappedComponent => {
const selectableFactory = React.createFactory(WrappedComponent);
return class Selectable extends Component {
state = {
isSelected: false
};
handleClick = () => {
this.setState({
isSelected: !this.state.isSelected
});
};
render() {
return selectableFactory({
...this.props,
onClick: this.handleClick,
selected: this.state.isSelected
});
}
}
};
https://codesandbox.io/s/7zwwxw5y41
I know that doesn't answer your question. I think you're trying to let the child get away without any knowledge of the parent.
The ref route feels wrong, though. I like the idea of connecting the tools to the child. You can respond to the click in either one.
Let me know what you think.

Just as you did on DOM element for CanvasElement, Ref can be attached to class component as well, checkout the doc for Adding a Ref to a Class Component
export default function makeSelectable() {
return function decorateComponent(WrappedComponent) {
return class Selectable extends Component {
canvasElement = React.createRef()
componentDidMount() {
// attach to interaction element reference here
console.log(this.canvasElement.current.interactionElRef)
}
render() {
return (
<WrappedComponent ref={this.canvasElement} {...this.props} />
)
}
}
}
}
Also, do checkout Ref forwarding if you need child instance reference in ancestors that's multiple levels higher in the render tree. All those solutions are based on assumptions that you're on react 16.3+.
Some caveats:
In rare cases, you might want to have access to a child’s DOM node from a parent component. This is generally not recommended because it breaks component encapsulation, but it can occasionally be useful for triggering focus or measuring the size or position of a child DOM node.
While you could add a ref to the child component, this is not an ideal solution, as you would only get a component instance rather than a DOM node. Additionally, this wouldn’t work with functional components. https://reactjs.org/docs/forwarding-refs.html

I've now come up with an opinionated solution where the HoC injects two callback functions into the enhanced component, one to register the dom reference and another to register a callback that is called when an element is selected or deselected:
makeElementSelectable.js
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'
import movementIsStationary from '../lib/movement-is-stationary';
/*
This enhancer injects the following props into your component:
- setInteractableRef(node) - a function to register a React reference to the DOM element that should become selectable
- registerOnToggleSelected(cb(bool)) - a function to register a callback that should be called once the element is selected or deselected
*/
export default function makeElementSelectable() {
return function decorateComponent(WrappedComponent) {
return class Selectable extends Component {
static propTypes = {
selectable: PropTypes.bool.isRequired,
selected: PropTypes.bool
}
eventsAdded = false
state = {
selected: this.props.selected || false,
lastDownX: null,
lastDownY: null
}
setInteractableRef = (ref) => {
this.ref = ref
if (!this.eventsAdded && this.ref.current) {
this.addEventListeners(this.ref.current)
}
// other HoCs may set interactable references too
this.props.setInteractableRef && this.props.setInteractableRef(ref)
}
registerOnToggleSelected = (cb) => {
this.onToggleSelected = cb
}
componentDidMount() {
if (!this.eventsAdded && this.ref && this.ref.current) {
this.addEventListeners(this.ref.current)
}
}
componentWillUnmount() {
if (this.eventsAdded && this.ref && this.ref.current) {
this.removeEventListeners(this.ref.current)
}
}
/*
keep track of where the mouse was last pressed down
*/
onMouseDown = (e) => {
const lastDownX = e.clientX
const lastDownY = e.clientY
this.setState({
lastDownX, lastDownY
})
}
/*
toggle selected if there was a stationary click
only consider clicks on the exact element we are making interactable
*/
onClick = (e) => {
if (
this.props.selectable
&& e.target === this.ref.current
&& movementIsStationary(this.state.lastDownX, this.state.lastDownY, e.clientX, e.clientY)
) {
const selected = !this.state.selected
this.onToggleSelected && this.onToggleSelected(selected, e)
this.setState({ selected })
}
}
addEventListeners = (node) => {
node.addEventListener('click', this.onClick)
node.addEventListener('mousedown', this.onMouseDown)
this.eventsAdded = true
}
removeEventListeners = (node) => {
node.removeEventListener('click', this.onClick)
node.removeEventListener('mousedown', this.onMouseDown)
this.eventsAdded = false
}
render() {
return (
<WrappedComponent
{...this.props}
setInteractableRef={this.setInteractableRef}
registerOnToggleSelected={this.registerOnToggleSelected} />
)
}
}
}
}
CanvasElement.js
import React, { PureComponent } from 'react'
import { connect } from 'react-redux'
import { bindActionCreators } from 'redux'
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'
import flowRight from 'lodash.flowright'
import { moveSelectedElements } from '../actions/canvas'
import makeElementSelectable from '../enhancers/makeElementSelectable'
class CanvasElement extends PureComponent {
static propTypes = {
setInteractableRef: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
registerOnToggleSelected: PropTypes.func
}
interactionRef = React.createRef()
componentDidMount() {
this.props.setInteractableRef(this.interactionRef)
this.props.registerOnToggleSelected(this.onToggleSelected)
}
onToggleSelected = async (selected) => {
await this.props.selectElement(this.props.id, selected)
}
render() {
return (
<div ref={this.interactionRef}>
Select me
</div>
)
}
}
const mapStateToProps = (state, ownProps) => {
const {
canvas: {
selectedElements
}
} = state
const selected = !!selectedElements[ownProps.id]
return {
selected
}
}
const mapDispatchToProps = dispatch => ({
selectElement: bindActionCreators(selectElement, dispatch)
})
const ComposedCanvasElement = flowRight(
connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps),
makeElementSelectable()
)(CanvasElement)
export default ComposedCanvasElement
This works, but I can think of at least one significant issue: the HoC injects 2 props into the enhanced component; but the enhanced component has no way of declaratively defining which props are injected and just needs to "trust" that these props are magically available
Would appreciate feedback / thoughts on this approach. Perhaps there is a better way, e.g. by passing in a "mapProps" object to makeElementSelectable to explicitly define which props are being injected?