Functions that call eachother [duplicate] - javascript

This question already has answers here:
Are variables statically or dynamically "scoped" in javascript?
(7 answers)
What is the scope of variables in JavaScript?
(27 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I am looking for someone to explain me something since I can't find a clear answer. My question is about functions that call themselves. I saw that it is possible to build a list of functions that are 'chained' together and for example the first function calls the second one then the second one calls another one. My confusion is : Lets say that you have a second function that has a variable let a = 12; if i call that function on the first function, will i have access to that variable or whatever that second function might have inside? How can i pass info to another function? can a function can be dependent on another function in order to complete a task? Thanks in advance guys.
Edit to make it more clear what I mean:
function first(){
second();
// will i have access to whatever there is inside function second since i am calling it here ? or it doesn't work that way?
}
function second(){
let a = 12;
third();
}
function third(){
fourth()....
}

Related

Difference between function declerations [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
var functionName = function() {} vs function functionName() {}
(41 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
What is the difference between this (a 'standalone' function):
function standaloneFunction () {
console.log('standaloneFunction runs, success')
}
standaloneFunction()
...and this (a function inside a variable):
let variableFunction = function variableFunction () {
console.log('function inside let has same name as the variable, runs? - yep, does.')
}
variableFunction()
Is it a problem that the variable and the function share the same name?
it doesnt seem so - i speculate this is because it has something to do how variables
and functions are saved in memory? Functions in their entirety, and variables only their declaration?
When i do console.log(this), i can't find the 'variableFunction' in the execution
context of 'this' - however, 'standaloneFunction' does appear.
Have you, as a beginner, also asked yourself such questions? Am i being too picky about such details?
Should i already use es6 syntax?
Please also don't hold back with any advice regarding articulating my question.
Thanks to everyone who has taken their time to read this.
The first is a function declaration, which will be hoisted. The second is a named function expression, but I think an anonymous function expression would be better in this case since there’s no need to name the function, e.g. let variableFunction = function() {…}.
Please see What is the difference between a function expression vs declaration in JavaScript?

Functions Considered as Objects in JavaScript [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How do JavaScript closures work?
(86 answers)
JavaScript closure inside loops – simple practical example
(44 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I am new to JavaScript (and StackOverflow) and am hoping to get some help on a problem that has bothered me for some time. I understand that functions are considered objects in JS. A function is different from an object in the sense that it can execute code.
This may be a very simple and straightforward question to some of you veteran folks. I don't understand how the code works below. Essentially there is a function count() that returns an anonymous counter function. keepCount points to the anonymous function (an object, of course) that count() returns.
function count() {
var num = 0;
return function(correct) {
if (correct)
num++;
return num;
}
}
var keepCount = count();
keepCount(true); // num is 1
keepCount(true); // num is 2
keepCount(true); // 3
keepCount(true); // 4
console.log(keepCount(true)); // Call it again and print. It is 5.
My question: What is causing the result of num to be 'saved' or recorded with each function call? Isn't num a variable local to count() — the outer function? num does not appear to be a property of the anonymous function. I suspect the answer has something to do with the fact that functions are considered objects in JS, and that a local variable can be continuously updated in the variable object of count(). A new variable object is not produced for count() with each call of the anonymous function.
I would also appreciate comments on the formatting of this question and all. I want to be sure that I am following StackOverflow guidelines properly. I also hope that the details of the question make sense. Please let me know if anyone requires clarification.

Using the function inside a function in Javascript [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Javascript call nested function
(11 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
Can anyone please help me in this? I have declared a function inside a function and now want to call only that function.
For example:
function hello(){
alert("Hello");
function insideHello(){
alert("insideHello");
}
}
I just want to call the insideHello function.
I know one way is to call (new hello()).insideHello(); by declaring this.insideHello = function. I don't want to use new every time because I am using this in canvas scenario.
You could make hello a "module" that exposes insideHello as part of its API:
function hello() {
alert("Hello");
function insideHello() {
alert("insideHello");
}
return {
insideHello // or insideHello: insideHello
}
}
hello().insideHello()
I would have two functions and you call the second one from inside the first - but you can call the second one separately as well (of course the names wont mean much in this example).
function hello(){
alert("Hello");
insideHello();
}
function insideHello(){
alert("insideHello");
}
That way you can get both the outer and inner function by calling hello(); and just the inner function by calling insideHello(); ... again noting that the names are not very descriptive since i removed the inner function to the outside. But it seems that if you want to only call the inner one then you shouldn't need to call the outer one. and if you want to call both then the outer one should be able to handle that.

With jQuery, what is the point of encapsulating a function in round brackets? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
What is the purpose of a self executing function in javascript?
(21 answers)
What is the (function() { } )() construct in JavaScript?
(28 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
I see this in some HTML files that use jQuery, at the bottom:
(function() {
setTimeout(function(){window.scrollTo(0,0);},0);
})();
What does it mean to put the whole function in round brackets?
The code you gave as example is a self-executing anonymous function.
You can read more about them here.
Relevant text from that article:
What’s useful here is that JavaScript has function level scoping. All variables and functions defined within the anonymous function aren’t available to the code outside of it, effectively using closure to seal itself from the outside world.
(function() {})(); means it is self executing anonymous function. It get called immediately when java script get rendered. More details you can search it.
setTimeout is a function which accepts two parameters:
First parameter: A function
Second parameter: an integer value in milliseconds.
By calling the setTimeout function, the function from first parameter will be called/invoked after the amount of time specified in the second parameter.

JavaScript - Get calling object [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Javascript how do you find the caller function?
Is there a way to get the value of this from the function which has called the current function?
Look at this:
function TraceMySelf(){
console.log(this);
}
function A(){
TraceMySelf();
console.log(this);
}
var a = new A();
When this code is executed, the console displays first the window object and then the a object. How can I make the code display the a object twice, with only changing line 2? I know that I could apply the function inside A with this, but that isn't what I want.
Is this possible?
I think this is the answer to your question: StackOverflow 280389
However, I think the right answer is "don't do that". I think it runs counter to how JavaScript is designed.
It might also be worth looking at jQuery Proxy for another way of linking function and object.

Categories