The component code has several parameters, each of which has an initial value received from the server. How can I track that one of them (or several at once) has changed its state from the original one in order to suggest that the user save the changes or reset them?
Something similar can be seen in Discord when changing the profile / server.
The solution I found using useEffect () looks redundant, because there may be many times more options.
const [hiddenData, setHiddenData] = useState(server.hidden_data);
const [hiddenProfile, setHiddenProfile] = useState(server.hidden_profile);
const [isChanged, setIsChanged] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
if (hiddenData !== server.hidden_data
|| hiddenProfile !== server.hidden_profile) {
setIsChanged(true);
} else {
setIsChanged(false);
}
}, [hiddenData, server.hidden_data, hiddenProfile, server.hidden_profile]);
return (
<>
{isChanged && <div>You have unsaved changes!</div>}
</>
);
Maybe something like that?
const [draftState, setDraftState] = useState(server)
const [state, setState] = useState(server)
// a more complex object with the list of changed props is fine too
const isChanged = lodash.isEqual(state, draftState)
function changeProp (prop, value) {
setState({
...draftState,
[prop]: value
})
}
function saveState () {
setState(draftState)
// Persist state if needed
}
Related
I have this simple useEffect code. When the user logged in to the application every 2 minutes I will dispatch an action which is an API call, and I need to stop this interval once a user is logged out. Still, the current code even runs after the user is logged out, what shall I do to prevent this interval when the user logs out.
I am using the value from the localStorage to determine whether the user is logged in or not.
const intervalId = useRef(null)
useEffect(() => {
const isLoggedIn = localStorage.getItem("isUserLoggedIn") //(true or false)
intervalId.current = setInterval(() => {
dispatch(refreshUserToken());
if(isLoggedIn === false){
clearInterval(intervalId.current)
}
},1000*60*2)
return () => {
clearInterval(intervalId.current)
}
},[])
Is there any way to resolve my issue?
Any help would be much appreciated!!
You should be adding the line where you get that value from localStorage inside the interval, if you want the updated value. Also, localStorage would gives you a string instead of a boolean, either you parse it, or you change your if statement. Try with this:
const intervalId = useRef(null);
useEffect(() => {
intervalId.current = setInterval(() => {
const isLoggedIn = localStorage.getItem("isUserLoggedIn"); //(true or false)
if (isLoggedIn === "false") {
clearInterval(intervalId.current);
return;
}
dispatch(refreshUserToken());
}, 1000 * 60 * 2);
return () => {
clearInterval(intervalId.current);
};
}, []);
You could use an event instead of a setInterval. As an example, change the code where you are setting the localStorage to this:
localStorage.setItem("isUserLoggedIn", true); // or false depending on the context
window.dispatchEvent(new Event("storage")); // you notice that there is a change
You change your useEffect to this:
useEffect(()=>{
const listenStorageChange = () => {
const isLoggedIn = localStorage.getItem("isUserLoggedIn");
console.log(isLoggedIn);
// do your logic here
};
window.addEventListener("storage", listenStorageChange);
return () => window.removeEventListener("storage", listenStorageChange);
},[])
The keys and the values stored with localStorage are always in the UTF-16 string format. As with objects, integer keys and booleans are automatically converted to strings.
So you have to call like this:
if(isLoggedIn === 'false'){
clearInterval(intervalId.current)
}
Check the documentation.
Currently i'm doing a quiz composed by multiple categories that can be chosen by the user and i wanna check if the user responded to all questions. For doing that, i compared the number of questions he answered with the number of questions gived by the api response. The problem is that i have an "submit answers" button at the end of the last question, with that onClick function:
const sendAnswers = (e, currentQuiz) => {
setQuizzes({...quizzes, [currentQuiz]:answers});
setAnswers([])
var answeredToAllQuestions = true
DataState.map(function (quiz) {
if(quiz.category in quizzes){
if(Object.keys(quiz.questions).length !== Object.keys(quizzes[quiz.category]).length){
answeredToAllQuestions=false;
}
}
});
if(answeredToAllQuestions === false){
setAlertTrigger(1);
}
else{
setNumber(number+1);
}
}
in that function i use setState on this line: setQuizzes({...quizzes, [currentQuiz]:answers}); to upload the answers he checked on the last question before checking if he answered to all questions. The problem is that state of quizzes is not updated imediatly and it s not seen by the if condition.
I really don't know how am i supposed to update the state right after setting it because, as i know, react useState updates the state at the next re-render and that causes trouble to me..
Considering that quizzes will be equal to {...quizzes, [currentQuiz]:answers} (after setQuizzes will set it), there is no reason to use quizzes in if condition. Replace it with a local var and problem will be solved.
const sendAnswers = (e, currentQuiz) => {
let futureValueOfQuizzes = {...quizzes, [currentQuiz]:answers}
setQuizzes(futureValueOfQuizzes);
setAnswers([])
var answeredToAllQuestions = true
DataState.map(function (quiz) {
if(quiz.category in futureValueOfQuizzes){
if(Object.keys(quiz.questions).length !== Object.keys(quizzes[quiz.category]).length){
answeredToAllQuestions=false;
}
}
});
if(answeredToAllQuestions === false){
setAlertTrigger(1);
}
else{
setNumber(number+1);
}
}
I would like to take this opportunity to say that these type of problems appear when you use React state for your BI logic. Don't do that! Much better use a local var defined in components body:
const Component = () => {
const [myVar , setMyVar] = useState();
let myVar = 0;
...
}
If myVar is used only for BI logic, use the second initialization, never the first!
Of course sometimes you need a var that is in BI logic and in render (so the state is the only way). In that case set the state properly but for script logic use a local var.
You have to either combine the useState hook with the useEffect or update your sendAnswers method to perform your control flow through an intermediary variable:
Using a temporary variable where next state is stored:
const sendAnswers = (e, currentQuiz) => {
const newQuizzes = {...quizzes, [currentQuiz]:answers};
let answeredToAllQuestions = true
DataState.map(function (quiz) {
if(quiz.category in newQuizzes){
if (Object.keys(quiz.questions).length !== Object.keys(newQuizzes[quiz.category]).length){
answeredToAllQuestions = false;
}
}
});
setQuizzes(newQuizzes);
setAnswers([]);
if (answeredToAllQuestions === false) {
setAlertTrigger(1);
} else {
setNumber(number+1);
}
}
Using the useEffect hook:
const sendAnswers = (e, currentQuiz) => {
setQuizzes({...quizzes, [currentQuiz]:answers});
setAnswers([]);
}
useEffect(() => {
let answeredToAllQuestions = true
DataState.map(function (quiz) {
if(quiz.category in quizzes){
if (Object.keys(quiz.questions).length !== Object.keys(quizzes[quiz.category]).length){
answeredToAllQuestions = false;
}
}
});
if (answeredToAllQuestions === false) {
setAlertTrigger(1);
} else {
setNumber(number+1);
}
}, [quizzes]);
I have the following code for uploading multiple images in my React app. The problem is that console.log(e) prints Progress Event object with all its values, but when I want to update my state I still be the default values, null, 0, []. I understand that onload is asynchronous and that might be the reason they are not updated. Technically the code is working when I upload file one by one. When I select multiple files at once, only the first one is being displayed. What am I doing wrong here?
const [fileUpload, setFileUpload] = useState(null);
const [filesUploaded, setFilesUploaded] = useState([]);
const [filesUploadedCount, setFilesUploadedCount] = useState(0);
const handleFileUpload = (e) => {
if (filesUploadedCount === 5 || e.currentTarget.files > 5) {
return;
}
const files = e.currentTarget.files;
console.log(files.length);
console.log(e.currentTarget.files);
Array.from(files).forEach((file: any) => {
const reader = new FileReader();
reader.onload = (e) => {
console.log(e); // Progress Event {}
setFileUpload(e.target.result);
setFilesUploadedCount(filesUploaded.length + 1);
setFilesUploaded([...filesUploaded, e.target.result]);
console.log(fileUpload); // null
console.log(filesUploaded); // []
console.log(filesUploaded.length); // 0
console.log(filesUploadedCount); // 0
};
reader.readAsDataURL(file);
});
};
Here I display them.
{filesUploaded?.map((file, index) => {
return (
<ItemImage
key={index}
src={file}
handleRemoveFile={handleRemoveFile}
/>
);
})}
useState is also asynchronous operation, so you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. Pass a function like this. You may not see in your console.log because of that.
setFilesUploaded(prevState => [...prevState, e.target.result]);
I am designing a google-doc like collaborative tool with latest React + Slate as Frontend and Flask in Backend. I am using socket-io in React and flask_socketio in Python to emit and listen content from other collaborators.
React app code:
const RichTextExample = props => {
const [value, setValue] = useState(props.currentEditor);
const editor = useMemo(() => withHistory(withReact(createEditor())), []);
const id = useRef(`${Date.now()}`);
const remote = useRef(false);
const socketchange = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
socket.on("new-remote-operations", ({ editorId, ops, doc_id }) => {
if (id.current !== editorId && doc_id === props.document.doc_id) {
remote.current = true;
JSON.parse(ops).forEach(op => {
console.log("LISTEN: applying op", op);
editor.apply(op);
});
remote.current = false;
console.log('value is ', value);
socketchange.current = true; //variable to track socket changes in editor via operations
}
});}, [])
return(
<Slate
editor={editor}
value={value}
onChange={value => {
setValue(value);
const ops = editor.operations
.filter(o => {
if (o) {
return o.type !== "set_selection" && o.type !== "set_value";
}
return false;
});
if (ops.length && !remote.current && !socketchange.current) {
console.log("EMIT: Editor operations are ", ops);
socket.emit("new-operations", {
editorId: id.current,
ops: JSON.stringify(ops),
doc_id: props.document.doc_id
});
}
socketchange.current = false;
}}
>
Python code for socket is simple:
app = Flask(__name__)
db_name = 'userdoc.db'
app.config['SECRET_KEY'] = 'secret-key'
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'sqlite:///'+db_name
socketio = SocketIO(app, cors_allowed_origins="*")
#socketio.on('new-operations', namespace='/')
def operations(data):
print('operations listened...1/2/3..')
emit('new-remote-operations', data, broadcast=True, include_self=False)
Issue:
When split_node is passed as an type of operation in socket.on(),
editor.apply(op) doesn't apply it as it suppose to. Please help me on this.
Because of this, I get following two cases:
I think the issue you are facing is because you send a batch of operations that should not be applied one by one.
A split_node operation like the one you are generating by hitting enter will actually split all the nested nodes till it reaches the leaves, and move some nodes around.
Concretely, a split_node is actually 2-3 operations following each others, that can't be applied solely. If you apply the first one for example, that would split the text node, and end up with two Text sharing the same attributes. Slate will normalize them and re-merge them as soon as it can, which in your case, happen between each editor.apply(op).
I think the solution here, is simply to wrap your whole loop inside the withoutNormalizing method. It will prevent Slate to normalize the document in-between the operations.
For Slate <= 0.47
editor.withoutNormalizing(() => {
JSON.parse(ops).forEach(op => {
editor.apply(op);
});
})
For Slate >= 0.5
Editor.withoutNormalizing(editor, () => {
JSON.parse(ops).forEach(op => {
editor.apply(op);
});
})
I'm teaching myself React and one of my exercises is using axios to fetch a list of countries from an API
const fetchCountries = () => {
axios.get("https://restcountries.eu/rest/v2/all").then(response => {
setCountries(response.data);
});
};
React.useEffect(fetchCountries, []);
Then as a user types into an input the list of countries filters down.
const handleInputChange = event => {
const filter = event.target.value; // current input value
let matchingCountries = query !== ''
? countries.filter(country => country.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(query.toLowerCase()) !== -1)
: countries;
setQuery(filter);
setMatches(matchingCountries)
console.log('matches', matches)
console.log('query', query)
};
My goal is that when a single country is matched, a new API request is triggered (to fetch the weather, but the what isn't my problem, the timing is). When a single country is matched, I will then render some data about the country, then fetch and render the weather details for the single country's capital city.
One of the problems I'm having is that when I set the state, the value always seems to be one step behind. For example, in this Codepen when you enter FRA you should get "France". However, I have to enter "FRAN" to get the match. This doesn't happen when I don't use a state variable for the matches (just let matches). This becomes a problem because I need to run the next API call when the number of matches = 1, but the length of the matches state is always wrong.
So I would like to know 1. how to get the correct state of the matched countries. And 2. when I should run the second API call without getting into an infinite loop.
useEffect solution using separation of concern
1 function should do 1 thing
handleInputChange updates state
useEffect updates state
But they are not coupled.
Later you might have a new function called handleDropdownChange which updates state
It that case you don't need to modify useEffect
At the end of the day, we (developers) don't like to rewrite things
const [countries, setCountries] = React.useState([]);
const [query, setQuery] = React.useState("");
const [matches, setMatches] = React.useState([]);
React.useEffect(() => {
let matchingCountries = query !== ''
? countries.filter(country => country.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(query.toLowerCase()) !== -1)
: countries;
setMatches(matchingCountries)
}, [query]); // called whenever state.query updated
const handleInputChange = event => {
setQuery(event.target.value); // update state
};
const fetchCountries = () => {
axios.get("https://restcountries.eu/rest/v2/all").then(response => {
setCountries(response.data);
});
};
React.useEffect(fetchCountries, []);
And there is also solution (not recommended) by directly using event.target.value provided by #Joseph D.
The only problem is you are using an old query value in handleInputChange().
Remember setting the state is asynchronous (i.e. doesn't take effect immediately)
Here's an updated version:
const handleInputChange = event => {
const filter = event.target.value; // current input value
let matchingCountries = filter ? <code here>
// ...
setQuery(filter);
};
UPDATE:
To call the weather api if there's a single country match is to have matches as dependency in useEffect().
useEffect(
() => {
async function queryWeatherApi() {
// const data = await fetch(...)
// setData(data)
}
if (matches.length === 1) {
queryWeatherApi();
}
},
[matches]
)
1) The reason for your problem is in this line:
let matchingCountries = filter !== ''
? countries.filter(country => country.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(query.toLowerCase()) !== -1)
: countries;
you use query instead of filter variable, your handler function should look like this:
const handleInputChange = event => {
const filter = event.target.value; // current input value
let matchingCountries = filter !== ''
? countries.filter(country => country.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(filter.toLowerCase()) !== -1)
: countries;
setQuery(filter);
setMatches(matchingCountries)
};
2) Where to run your next API call:
For studying purpose I do not want to recommend you using some application state management lib like redux.Just calling it right after setFilter and setQuery. It will run as expected. Because calling an API is asynchronous too so it will be executed after setQuery and setFilter what does not happen with console.log, a synchronous function.