I got these two functions, and they work great.
But since I only call global.replaceFields from global.translateAll then I want to get rid of global.replaceFields and put its functionality inside global.translateAll
How would you go about merging global.replaceFields into global.translateAll without losing the current functionality?
Thanks :)
// Translate everything in that field
global.translateAll = (textfield, usersLanguage) => {
for (var property in textfield) {
if (!textfield.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
return false;
} else if (typeof textfield[property] !== "object") {
textfield[property] = global.replaceFields(textfield[property], usersLanguage);
} else {
global.translateAll(textfield[property], usersLanguage);
}
}
}
// Translate everything in that field
global.replaceFields = (textfield, usersLanguage) => {
// Keep running until all fields are replaced
while (textfield.indexOf("{{") != -1) {
// isolate the field
let fromField = textfield.substring((textfield.indexOf("{{") + 2), (textfield.indexOf("}}")));
let toField = ""
// If its a translated text
if (fromField.indexOf("trans") != -1) {
toField = usersLanguage[fromField];
textfield = textfield.replace("{{" + fromField + "}}", toField);
}
}
return (textfield);
}
This should work
global.translateAll = (textfield, usersLanguage) => {
var replaceFields = (textfield, usersLanguage) => {
// Keep running until all fields are replaced
while (textfield.indexOf("{{") != -1) {
// isolate the field
let fromField = textfield.substring((textfield.indexOf("{{") + 2), (textfield.indexOf("}}")));
let toField = ""
// If its a translated text
if (fromField.indexOf("trans") != -1) {
toField = usersLanguage[fromField];
textfield = textfield.replace("{{" + fromField + "}}", toField);
}
}
return (textfield);
}
for (var property in textfield) {
if (!textfield.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
return false;
} else if (typeof textfield[property] !== "object") {
textfield[property] = replaceFields(textfield[property], usersLanguage);
} else {
global.translateAll(textfield[property], usersLanguage);
}
}
}
Related
I've been trying to do some html and css but I'm really bad at this so far. I was using a function that would check if two selectors match. A friend of mine came up with this code but neither of us fully understands how the return of the "tag.class" case works. My question is, if it doesn't divide the newSelector, how can it succesfully check the tag and class?
var matchFunctionMaker = function(selector) {
var selectorType = selectorTypeMatcher(selector);
var matchFunction;
if (selectorType === "id") {
matchFunction = nuevoSelector => '#' + nuevoSelector.id === selector;
} else if (selectorType === "class") {
matchFunction = nuevoSelector => {
var lista = nuevoSelector.classList;
for (let x of lista) {
if (selector === '.' + x) return true;
}
return false;
}
} else if (selectorType === "tag.class") {
matchFunction = nuevoSelector => {
var [tag, clase] = selector.split('.');
return matchFunctionMaker(tag) (nuevoSelector) && matchFunctionMaker(`.${clase}`) (nuevoSelector);
};
} else if (selectorType === "tag") {
matchFunction = nuevoSelector => nuevoSelector.tagName.toLowerCase() === selector.toLowerCase();
}
return matchFunction;
};
Thanks in advance!
i have these inputs and i wanted to check every one of them has value then do something;
const tch_family_name = document.getElementById('tch_family_name');
const tch_lastname = document.getElementById('tch_lastname');
const tch_name = document.getElementById('tch_name');
const tch_phone = document.getElementById('tch_phone');
const first_alph = document.getElementById('first_alph');
const second_alph = document.getElementById('second_alph');
const third_alph = document.getElementById('third_alph');
const tch_bday = document.getElementById('tch_bday');
const textarea1 = document.getElementById('textarea1');
and I'm checking they have value or not like this
function checkEmpty(check) {
for (i = 0; i < check.length; i++) {
if (check[i].value == "" || check[i].value == " " || check[i].value == null) {
check[i].classList.add('inputErrorBorder')
} else {
check[i].classList.remove('inputErrorBorder')
}
}
}
//mainInfo button id
mainInfo.addEventListener('click', () => {
test = [tch_family_name, tch_lastname, tch_name, tch_phone, first_alph, second_alph, third_alph, tch_bday, textarea1]
checkEmpty(test)
})
now how to do something when all input have value;
I tried else if() but it gave an incorrect result for example when first input don't value then it wont add inputErrorBorder class to a second or third inputs.
Please help;
One of the easiest ways to add this to your current setup is to add a flag variable to the checkEmpty function and return that value. Then process the results in the EventListener
checkEmpty With hasEmpty Flag
function checkEmpty(check) {
let hasEmpty = false;
for (let i = 0; i < check.length; i++) {
if (check[i].value === "" || check[i].value === " " || check[i].value == null) {
check[i].classList.add('inputErrorBorder');
hasEmpty = true;
} else {
check[i].classList.remove('inputErrorBorder');
}
}
return hasEmpty;
}
Using hasEmpty flag from checkEmpty
mainInfo.addEventListener('click', () => {
let test = [tch_family_name, tch_lastname, tch_name, tch_phone,
first_alph, second_alph, third_alph, tch_bday, textarea1];
let hasEmpty = checkEmpty(test);
if (!hasEmpty) {
// All Have Value
} else {
// Something has missing value
}
})
I have made this function into a JS file...
function getColors(isPick, isForecolor)
{
var chosenFunction = 'getColor(' + isPick + ', ' + isForecolor + ')';
csInterface.evalScript(chosenFunction, function(result)
{
if(result !== 'undefined')
{
if (isForecolor == true){
foregroundHexColor = result;
// etc...
}
else
{
backgroundHexColor = result;
//etc..
};
};
});
};
which get a hexadecimal color value from this function from a JSX file.
function getColor(isPick, isForecolor)
{
var color_PickerCase;
var decimal_Color;
var hexadecimal_Color;
if (isForecolor == true)
{
color_PickerCase = app.foregroundColor.rgb.hexValue;
}
else
{
color_PickerCase = app.backgroundColor.rgb.hexValue;
};
if (isPick == true)
{
if (app.showColorPicker(isForecolor)){
decimal_Color = color_PickerCase;
hexadecimal_Color = decimal_Color.toString(16);
}
else
{
return;
};
}
else
{
decimal_Color = color_PickerCase;
hexadecimal_Color = decimal_Color.toString(16);
};
return hexadecimal_Color;
};
In some way it works, but for some reason I have to do the same thing two times so to get the value!!! Any idea why is this happening?
Thank you for your time!!!
UPDATE: A correction, it works only at first click. Then needs to clicked two times so to get the value!!!
Well, here is the solution...
function getColor(isPick, isForecolor)
{
var color_PickerCase;
var decimal_Color;
var hexadecimal_Color;
if (isPick === true && app.showColorPicker(isForecolor) === false)
{
return;
}
if (isForecolor === true)
{
color_PickerCase = app.foregroundColor.rgb.hexValue;
}
else
{
color_PickerCase = app.backgroundColor.rgb.hexValue;
}
decimal_Color = color_PickerCase;
hexadecimal_Color = decimal_Color.toString(16);
return hexadecimal_Color;
};
As joojaa from graphicdesign said, I was asking for the color before picking it and I was getting the color form the last time!!!
I have been trying to translate my code from es6 to es5 because of some framework restrictions at my work... Although I have been quite struggling to locate what the problem is. For some reason the code does not work quite the same, and there is no errors either ...
Can someone tell me If I have translated properly ?
This is the ES6 code :
function filterFunction(items, filters, stringFields = ['Title', 'Description'], angular = false) {
// Filter by the keys of the filters parameter
const filterKeys = Object.keys(filters);
// Set up a mutable filtered object with items
let filtered;
// Angular doesn't like deep clones... *sigh*
if (angular) {
filtered = items;
} else {
filtered = _.cloneDeep(items);
}
// For each key in the supplied filters
for (let key of filterKeys) {
if (key !== 'TextInput') {
filtered = filtered.filter(item => {
// Make sure we have something to filter by...
if (filters[key].length !== 0) {
return _.intersection(filters[key], item[key]).length >= 1;
}
return true;
});
}
// If we're at TextInput, handle things differently
else if (key === 'TextInput') {
filtered = filtered.filter(item => {
let searchString = "";
// For each field specified in the strings array, build a string to search through
for (let field of stringFields) {
// Handle arrays differently
if (!Array.isArray(item[field])) {
searchString += `${item[field]} `.toLowerCase();
} else {
searchString += item[field].join(' ').toLowerCase();
}
}
// Return the item if the string matches our input
return searchString.indexOf(filters[key].toLowerCase()) !== -1;
});
}
}
return filtered;
}
And this is the code I translated that partially 99% work ..
function filterFunction(items, filters, stringFields, angular) {
// Filter by the keys of the filters parameter
var filterKeys = Object.keys(filters);
// Set up a mutable filtered object with items
var filtered;
// Angular doesn't like deep clones... *sigh*
if (angular) {
filtered = items;
} else {
filtered = _.cloneDeep(items);
}
// For each key in the supplied filters
for (var key = 0 ; key < filterKeys.length ; key ++) {
if (filterKeys[key] !== 'TextInput') {
filtered = filtered.filter( function(item) {
// Make sure we have something to filter by...
if (filters[filterKeys[key]].length !== 0) {
return _.intersection(filters[filterKeys[key]], item[filterKeys[key]]).length >= 1;
}
return true;
});
}
// If we're at TextInput, handle things differently
else if (filterKeys[key] === 'TextInput') {
filtered = filtered.filter(function(item) {
var searchString = "";
// For each field specified in the strings array, build a string to search through
for (var field = 0; field < stringFields.length; field ++) {
// Handle arrays differently
console.log(field);
if (!Array.isArray(item[stringFields[field]])) {
searchString += item[stringFields[field]] + ' '.toLowerCase();
} else {
searchString += item[stringFields[field]].join(' ').toLowerCase();
}
}
// Return the item if the string matches our input
return searchString.indexOf(filters[filterKeys[key]].toLowerCase()) !== -1;
});
}
}
return filtered;
}
These two lines
searchString += `${item[field]} `.toLowerCase();
searchString += item[stringFields[field]] + ' '.toLowerCase();
are not equivalent indeed. To apply the toLowerCase method on all parts of the string, you'll need to wrap the ES5 concatenation in parenthesis:
searchString += (item[stringFields[field]] + ' ').toLowerCase();
or, as blanks cannot be lowercased anyway, just use
searchString += item[stringFields[field]].toLowerCase() + ' ';
Here is a translated code from babeljs itself, as commented above.
'use strict';
function filterFunction(items, filters) {
var stringFields = arguments.length <= 2 || arguments[2] === undefined ? ['Title', 'Description'] : arguments[2];
var angular = arguments.length <= 3 || arguments[3] === undefined ? false : arguments[3];
// Filter by the keys of the filters parameter
var filterKeys = Object.keys(filters);
// Set up a mutable filtered object with items
var filtered = void 0;
// Angular doesn't like deep clones... *sigh*
if (angular) {
filtered = items;
} else {
filtered = _.cloneDeep(items);
}
// For each key in the supplied filters
var _iteratorNormalCompletion = true;
var _didIteratorError = false;
var _iteratorError = undefined;
try {
var _loop = function _loop() {
var key = _step.value;
if (key !== 'TextInput') {
filtered = filtered.filter(function (item) {
// Make sure we have something to filter by...
if (filters[key].length !== 0) {
return _.intersection(filters[key], item[key]).length >= 1;
}
return true;
});
}
// If we're at TextInput, handle things differently
else if (key === 'TextInput') {
filtered = filtered.filter(function (item) {
var searchString = "";
// For each field specified in the strings array, build a string to search through
var _iteratorNormalCompletion2 = true;
var _didIteratorError2 = false;
var _iteratorError2 = undefined;
try {
for (var _iterator2 = stringFields[Symbol.iterator](), _step2; !(_iteratorNormalCompletion2 = (_step2 = _iterator2.next()).done); _iteratorNormalCompletion2 = true) {
var field = _step2.value;
// Handle arrays differently
if (!Array.isArray(item[field])) {
searchString += (item[field] + ' ').toLowerCase();
} else {
searchString += item[field].join(' ').toLowerCase();
}
}
// Return the item if the string matches our input
} catch (err) {
_didIteratorError2 = true;
_iteratorError2 = err;
} finally {
try {
if (!_iteratorNormalCompletion2 && _iterator2.return) {
_iterator2.return();
}
} finally {
if (_didIteratorError2) {
throw _iteratorError2;
}
}
}
return searchString.indexOf(filters[key].toLowerCase()) !== -1;
});
}
};
for (var _iterator = filterKeys[Symbol.iterator](), _step; !(_iteratorNormalCompletion = (_step = _iterator.next()).done); _iteratorNormalCompletion = true) {
_loop();
}
} catch (err) {
_didIteratorError = true;
_iteratorError = err;
} finally {
try {
if (!_iteratorNormalCompletion && _iterator.return) {
_iterator.return();
}
} finally {
if (_didIteratorError) {
throw _iteratorError;
}
}
}
return filtered;
}
p.s. Or there is a better way to use babeljs directly without manually converting it.
I currently have this code built in JS, but it's really, really ugly.
Is there any better way to approach it?
The way it works basically is pushing a string like app.chat.test to be the key, and value like teststr.
I test the lengths to see if the "parent" key is there, otherwise we build it.
function constructJson(jsonKey, jsonValue){
//REWRITE!!!!!!!!
let jsonObj = langFile;
let jsonKeyArr = jsonKey.split('.')
if (jsonKeyArr.length === 1) {
if (valToAdd === undefined) {
if (jsonObj[jsonKey] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKey] = {}
}
} else {
if (jsonObj[jsonKey] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKey] = valToAdd
}
}
} else if (jsonKeyArr.length === 2) {
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] = jsonValue
}
} else if (jsonKeyArr.length === 3) {
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]] = jsonValue
}
} else if (jsonKeyArr.length === 4) {
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]][jsonKeyArr[3]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]][jsonKeyArr[3]] = jsonValue
}
} else if (jsonKeyArr.length === 5) {
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]][jsonKeyArr[3]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]][jsonKeyArr[3]] = {}
}
if (jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]][jsonKeyArr[3]][jsonKeyArr[4]] === undefined) {
jsonObj[jsonKeyArr[0]][jsonKeyArr[1]][jsonKeyArr[2]][jsonKeyArr[3]][jsonKeyArr[4]] = jsonValue
}
} else if (jsonKeyArr.length > 5) {
return console.log("Length over 5 not supported yet!")
}
return jsonObj;
}
Regards.
OF course it's possible, a simple loop will perfeclty do the job.
function constructJson(jsonKey, jsonValue){
//REWRITE!!!!!!!!
langFile = {a:{}, foo:{}};// remove this for your own code
var jsonObj = langFile;
var jsonKeyArr = jsonKey.split('.');
var currentValue = jsonObj;
for(var i = 0; i < jsonKeyArr.length;i++){
if(currentValue[jsonKeyArr[i]]===undefined){
currentValue[jsonKeyArr[i]] = {};
}
if(i < jsonKeyArr.length-1){
currentValue = currentValue[jsonKeyArr[i]];
}else{
currentValue[jsonKeyArr[i]] = jsonValue;
}
}
return jsonObj;
}
alert(JSON.stringify(constructJson("a.b.cd.ef", "toto")));
I just assigning to a temporary variable each sublevel. When i'm on the last i'm assigning the value.
Yes you can, using the javascript reduce function on the array created from the splitted string.
function namespaceCreateExceptLast(representationOfElementToCreate, baseNamespace) {
var tokens;
if (typeof representationOfElementToCreate !== 'string')
throw new Error('Expecting string as first parameter');
if (baseNamespace === undefined)
baseNamespace = window;
tokens = representationOfElementToCreate.split('.');
// Remove the last element (which will contain the value)
tokens.pop();
// Use reduce to create part by part your new object
return tokens.reduce(function (prev, property) {
if (typeof prev !== 'object') {
throw Error('One property is already defined but not an object, namespace creation has failed', property);
return undefined;
} else {
if (!prev[property])
prev[property] = {};
return prev[property];
}
}, baseNamespace);
};
Then you can have:
function constructJson(jsonKey, jsonValue){
let jsonObj = langFile;
var lastItem = namespaceCreateExceptLast(jsonKey, jsonObj);
var lastKey = jsonKey.substring(jsonKey.lastIndexOf('.') + 1);
lastItem[lastKey] = jsonValue;
}
I have added some comments and exceptions to help you understand how it's done, but it's mainly based on the reduce function which you can easily get help for (https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Objets_globaux/Array/reduce).