Testing async behavior in React with Axios and Jest - javascript

Consider the following oversimplified React component. When you click the button, it makes an API call to an external URL.
If it is successful, it increments the counter
If it is unsuccessful, it decrements the counter
import axios from 'axios';
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
import React from 'react';
class MyCoolButton extends React.Component {
static propTypes = {
initialCounter: PropTypes.number.isRequired
};
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.onClick = this.onClick.bind(this);
this.state = {
counter: props.initialCounter
}
}
onClick() {
const url = `/some/url/here`;
const data = { foo: 'bar' };
const config = { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Accept': 'application/json' } };
const { counter } = this.state;
return axios.patch(url, data, config)
.then((response) => { /* Success! */ this.setState({ counter: counter + 1 }); })
.catch((error) => { /* Failure :( */ this.setState({ counter: counter - 1 }); });
}
render() {
return (
<div className="container">
<span>Counter value is: {this.state.counter}</span>
<input className="cool-button" type="button" onClick={this.onClick} />
</div>
);
}
}
export default MyCoolButton;
I wanted to write a test case using Jest to ensure that when there is a failure, we are correctly decrementing the button.
I tried the following:
describe('an error occurred while updating', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
axios.patch.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.reject('boo'));
});
it('decrements the counter', async() => {
// NOTE: The below uses Enzyme and Chai expectation helpers
wrapper = mount(<MyCoolButton initialCounter={99} />);
// Click the button
wrapper.find(`.cool-button`).first().simulate('click');
// Check for decrmented value
const body = wrapper.find('.container span');
expect(body).to.have.text('Counter value is: 98');
});
});
The problem is that the click and subsequent state update are executed asynchronously, so we check for the failure before it has a chance to even update the component with the failure.
A lot of the examples online seem to suggest async/await which I don't understand that well. It looks like await takes a Promise as an argument, but in my case I'm simulating a click which further calls a handler which returns a Promise, so I can't await on that axios Promise to complete directly.
What's the best practice in testing here?
Thanks!

I think the following will do the trick:
describe('an error occurred while updating', () => {
beforeEach(() => {});
it('decrements the counter', async () => {
const promise = Promise.reject('boo');
axios.patch.mockImplementationOnce(() => promise);
const wrapper = mount(
<MyCoolButton initialCounter={99} />
);
// Click the button
wrapper.find(`.cool-button`).first().simulate('click');
//do catch().then to make sure test executes after
// component caught the rejection.
return promise.catch(x=>x).then(() => {
// Check for decrmented value
const body = wrapper.find('.container span');
expect(body).to.have.text('Counter value is: 98');
});
});
});
Here are some async examples for jest

You need to mount the component and simulate the click event before making the assertion:
describe("an error occurred while updating", () => {
let wrapper;
beforeEach(() => {
axios.patch.mockRejectedValue("Mock error message");
wrapper = mount(<MyCoolButton initialCounter={99} />);
wrapper.find(".cool-button").simulate("click");
});
it("decrements the counter", () => {
expect(wrapper.find(".container span").text()).toEqual(
"Counter value is: 98"
);
});
});

Related

Calling setState in Axios async/await function [duplicate]

Problem
I am writing an application in React and was unable to avoid a super common pitfall, which is calling setState(...) after componentWillUnmount(...).
I looked very carefully at my code and tried to put some guarding clauses in place, but the problem persisted and I am still observing the warning.
Therefore, I've got two questions:
How do I figure out from the stack trace, which particular component and event handler or lifecycle hook is responsible for the rule violation?
Well, how to fix the problem itself, because my code was written with this pitfall in mind and is already trying to prevent it, but some underlying component's still generating the warning.
Browser console
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application.
To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in the componentWillUnmount
method.
in TextLayerInternal (created by Context.Consumer)
in TextLayer (created by PageInternal) index.js:1446
d/console[e]
index.js:1446
warningWithoutStack
react-dom.development.js:520
warnAboutUpdateOnUnmounted
react-dom.development.js:18238
scheduleWork
react-dom.development.js:19684
enqueueSetState
react-dom.development.js:12936
./node_modules/react/cjs/react.development.js/Component.prototype.setState
react.development.js:356
_callee$
TextLayer.js:97
tryCatch
runtime.js:63
invoke
runtime.js:282
defineIteratorMethods/</prototype[method]
runtime.js:116
asyncGeneratorStep
asyncToGenerator.js:3
_throw
asyncToGenerator.js:29
Code
Book.tsx
import { throttle } from 'lodash';
import * as React from 'react';
import { AutoWidthPdf } from '../shared/AutoWidthPdf';
import BookCommandPanel from '../shared/BookCommandPanel';
import BookTextPath from '../static/pdf/sde.pdf';
import './Book.css';
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: () => void;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
isComponentMounted: boolean = false;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
constructor(props: any) {
super(props);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
);
}
componentDidMount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = true;
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
this.isComponentMounted = false;
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
bookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
AutoWidthPdf.tsx
import * as React from 'react';
import { Document, Page, pdfjs } from 'react-pdf';
pdfjs.GlobalWorkerOptions.workerSrc = `//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pdf.js/${pdfjs.version}/pdf.worker.js`;
interface IProps {
file: string;
width: number;
onLoadSuccess: (pdf: any) => void;
}
export class AutoWidthPdf extends React.Component<IProps> {
render = () => (
<Document
file={this.props.file}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.props.onLoadSuccess(_)}
>
<Page
pageNumber={1}
width={this.props.width}
/>
</Document>
);
}
Update 1: Cancel throttleable function (still no luck)
const DEFAULT_WIDTH = 140;
class Book extends React.Component {
setDivSizeThrottleable: ((() => void) & Cancelable) | undefined;
pdfWrapper: HTMLDivElement | null = null;
state = {
hidden: true,
pdfWidth: DEFAULT_WIDTH,
};
componentDidMount = () => {
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
},
500,
);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable();
window.addEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable);
};
componentWillUnmount = () => {
window.removeEventListener("resize", this.setDivSizeThrottleable!);
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!.cancel();
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = undefined;
};
render = () => (
<div className="Book">
{ this.state.hidden && <div className="Book__LoadNotification centered">Book is being loaded...</div> }
<div className={this.getPdfContentContainerClassName()}>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
<div className="Book__PdfContent" ref={ref => this.pdfWrapper = ref}>
<AutoWidthPdf
file={BookTextPath}
width={this.state.pdfWidth}
onLoadSuccess={(_: any) => this.onDocumentComplete()}
/>
</div>
<BookCommandPanel
BookTextPath={BookTextPath}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
getPdfContentContainerClassName = () => this.state.hidden ? 'hidden' : '';
onDocumentComplete = () => {
try {
this.setState({ hidden: false });
this.setDivSizeThrottleable!();
} catch (caughtError) {
console.warn({ caughtError });
}
};
}
export default Book;
Here is a React Hooks specific solution for
Error
Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component.
Solution
You can declare let isMounted = true inside useEffect, which will be changed in the cleanup callback, as soon as the component is unmounted. Before state updates, you now check this variable conditionally:
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true; // note mutable flag
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
return () => { isMounted = false }; // cleanup toggles value, if unmounted
}, []); // adjust dependencies to your needs
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
fetchData();
return () => {
isMounted = false;
};
// simulate some Web API fetching
function fetchData() {
setTimeout(() => {
// drop "if (isMounted)" to trigger error again
// (take IDE, doesn't work with stack snippet)
if (isMounted) setState("data fetched")
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
}, 4000);
}
}, []);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
Extension: Custom useAsync Hook
We can encapsulate all the boilerplate into a custom Hook, that automatically aborts async functions in case the component unmounts or dependency values have changed before:
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data);
});
return () => { isActive = false };
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
// custom Hook for automatic abortion on unmount or dependency change
// You might add onFailure for promise errors as well.
function useAsync(asyncFn, onSuccess) {
useEffect(() => {
let isActive = true;
asyncFn().then(data => {
if (isActive) onSuccess(data)
else console.log("aborted setState on unmounted component")
});
return () => {
isActive = false;
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess]);
}
const Child = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState("loading (4 sec)...");
useAsync(simulateFetchData, setState);
return <div>Child: {state}</div>;
};
const Parent = () => {
const [mounted, setMounted] = useState(true);
return (
<div>
Parent:
<button onClick={() => setMounted(!mounted)}>
{mounted ? "Unmount" : "Mount"} Child
</button>
{mounted && <Child />}
<p>
Unmount Child, while it is still loading. It won't set state later on,
so no error is triggered.
</p>
</div>
);
};
const simulateFetchData = () => new Promise(
resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve("data fetched"), 4000));
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.0/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-32Gmw5rBDXyMjg/73FgpukoTZdMrxuYW7tj8adbN8z4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-bjQ42ac3EN0GqK40pC9gGi/YixvKyZ24qMP/9HiGW7w=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>var { useReducer, useEffect, useState, useRef } = React</script>
More on effect cleanups: Overreacted: A Complete Guide to useEffect
To remove - Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component warning, use componentDidMount method under a condition and make false that condition on componentWillUnmount method. For example : -
class Home extends Component {
_isMounted = false;
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
news: [],
};
}
componentDidMount() {
this._isMounted = true;
ajaxVar
.get('https://domain')
.then(result => {
if (this._isMounted) {
this.setState({
news: result.data.hits,
});
}
});
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this._isMounted = false;
}
render() {
...
}
}
If above solutions dont work, try this and it works for me:
componentWillUnmount() {
// fix Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted component
this.setState = (state,callback)=>{
return;
};
}
There is a hook that's fairly common called useIsMounted that solves this problem (for functional components)...
import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';
export function useIsMounted() {
const isMounted = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isMounted.current = true;
return () => isMounted.current = false;
}, []);
return isMounted;
}
then in your functional component
function Book() {
const isMounted = useIsMounted();
...
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted.current) { setState(data); }
})
});
...
}
Checking if a component is mounted is actually an anti pattern as per React documentation. The solution to the setState warning is rather to leverage on the use of an AbortController:
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort() // stop the query by aborting on the AbortController on unmount
}
}, [])
For asynchronous operations that aren't based on the Fetch API, there still should be a way to cancel these asynchronous operations, and you should rather leverage these than just checking if a component is mounted. If you are building your own API, you can implement the AbortController API in it to handle it.
For more context, the check if a component is mounted is an anti pattern as React is checking internally if the component is mounted to display that warning. Doing the same check again is just a way to hide the warning, and there are some easier ways to hide them than adding this piece of code on a big part of a codebase.
Source: https://medium.com/doctolib/react-stop-checking-if-your-component-is-mounted-3bb2568a4934
I had this warning possibly because of calling setState from an effect hook (This is discussed in these 3 issues linked together).
Anyway, upgrading the react version removed the warning.
React already removed this warning
but here is a better solution (not just workaround)
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController() // creating an AbortController
fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal }) // passing the signal to the query
.then(data => {
setState(data) // if everything went well, set the state
})
.catch(error => {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') return // if the query has been aborted, do nothing
throw error
})
return () => {
abortController.abort()
}
}, [])
The solution from #ford04 didn't worked to me and specially if you need to use the isMounted in multiple places (multiple useEffect for instance), it's recommended to useRef, as bellow:
Essential packages
"dependencies":
{
"react": "17.0.1",
}
"devDependencies": {
"typescript": "4.1.5",
}
My Hook Component
export const SubscriptionsView: React.FC = () => {
const [data, setData] = useState<Subscription[]>();
const isMounted = React.useRef(true);
React.useEffect(() => {
if (isMounted.current) {
// fetch data
// setData (fetch result)
return () => {
isMounted.current = false;
};
}
}
});
try changing setDivSizeThrottleable to
this.setDivSizeThrottleable = throttle(
() => {
if (this.isComponentMounted) {
this.setState({
pdfWidth: this.pdfWrapper!.getBoundingClientRect().width - 5,
});
}
},
500,
{ leading: false, trailing: true }
);
I know that you're not using history, but in my case I was using the useHistory hook from React Router DOM, which unmounts the component before the state is persisted in my React Context Provider.
To fix this problem I have used the hook withRouter nesting the component, in my case export default withRouter(Login), and inside the component const Login = props => { ...; props.history.push("/dashboard"); .... I have also removed the other props.history.push from the component, e.g, if(authorization.token) return props.history.push('/dashboard') because this causes a loop, because the authorization state.
An alternative to push a new item to history.
Add a ref to a jsx component and then check it exist
function Book() {
const ref = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
asyncOperation().then(data => {
if (ref.current) setState(data);
})
});
return <div ref={ref}>content</div>
}
I had a similar issue thanks #ford04 helped me out.
However, another error occurred.
NB. I am using ReactJS hooks
ndex.js:1 Warning: Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within `render`). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state.
What causes the error?
import {useHistory} from 'react-router-dom'
const History = useHistory()
if (true) {
history.push('/new-route');
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
This could not work because despite you are redirecting to new page all state and props are being manipulated on the dom or simply rendering to the previous page did not stop.
What solution I found
import {Redirect} from 'react-router-dom'
if (true) {
return <redirect to="/new-route" />
}
return (
<>
<render component />
</>
)
If you are fetching data from axios and the error still occurs, just wrap the setter inside the condition
let isRendered = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
isRendered = true;
axios
.get("/sample/api")
.then(res => {
if (isRendered) {
setState(res.data);
}
return null;
})
.catch(err => console.log(err));
return () => {
isRendered = false;
};
}, []);
I have 2 solutions for this error:
return:
If you are used hook and useEffect, So put a return end of useEffect.
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
return () => {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', logMouseMove)
}
}, [])
componentWillUnmount:
If you are used componentDidMount, So put componentWillUnmount next to it.
componentDidMount() {
window.addEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
componentWillUnmount() {
window.removeEventListener('mousemove', this.logMouseMove)
}
The isMounted approach is an anti-pattern in most cases because it doesn't actually clean up/cancel anything, it just avoids changing state on unmounted components, but does nothing with pending asynchronous tasks. The React team recently removed the leak warning because users keep creating a lot of anti-patterns to hide the warning rather than fix its cause.
But writing cancellable code in plain JS can be really tricky. To fix this I made my own lib useAsyncEffect2 with custom hooks, built on top of a cancellable promise (c-promise2) for executing cancellable async code to reach its graceful cancellation. All async stages (promises), including deep ones, are cancellable. This means that the request here will be automatically aborted if its parent context is canceled. Of course, any other asynchronous operation can be used instead of a request.
useAsyncEffect Demo with plain useState usage (Live Demo):
import React, { useState } from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({url}) {
const [text, setText] = useState("");
const cancel = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
setText("fetching...");
const json = (yield cpAxios(url)).data;
setText(`Success: ${JSON.stringify(json)}`);
},
[url]
);
return (
<div>
<div>{text}</div>
<button onClick={cancel}>
Cancel request
</button>
</div>
);
}
useAsyncEffect Demo with internal states usage (Live Demo):
import React from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
function TestComponent({ url, timeout }) {
const [cancel, done, result, err] = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
return (yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout)).data;
},
{ states: true, deps: [url] }
);
return (
<div>
{done ? (err ? err.toString() : JSON.stringify(result)) : "loading..."}
<button onClick={cancel} disabled={done}>
Cancel async effect (abort request)
</button>
</div>
);
}
Class component using decorators (Live demo)
import React, { Component } from "react";
import { ReactComponent } from "c-promise2";
import cpAxios from "cp-axios";
#ReactComponent
class TestComponent extends Component {
state = {
text: ""
};
*componentDidMount(scope) {
const { url, timeout } = this.props;
const response = yield cpAxios(url).timeout(timeout);
this.setState({ text: JSON.stringify(response.data, null, 2) });
}
render() {
return (<div>{this.state.text}</div>);
}
}
export default TestComponent;
More other examples:
Axios request with errors handling
Fetch weather by coords
Live search
Pause & Resume
Progress capturing
Edit: I just realized the warning is referencing a component called TextLayerInternal. That's likely where your bug is. The rest of this is still relevant, but it might not fix your problem.
1) Getting the instance of a component for this warning is tough. It looks like there is some discussion to improve this in React but there currently is no easy way to do it. The reason it hasn't been built yet, I suspect, is likely because components are expected to be written in such a way that setState after unmount isn't possible no matter what the state of the component is. The problem, as far as the React team is concerned, is always in the Component code and not the Component instance, which is why you get the Component Type name.
That answer might be unsatisfactory, but I think I can fix your problem.
2) Lodashes throttled function has a cancel method. Call cancel in componentWillUnmount and ditch the isComponentMounted. Canceling is more "idiomatically" React than introducing a new property.
UPDATE DO NOT USE MY ORIGINAL ANSWER AS IT DOES NOT WORK
This answer was based on the use of cancelable promises and a note in makecancelable which I migrated to use hooks. However, it appears it does not cancel a chain of async/await and even cancelable-promise does not support canceling of a chain of awaits
Doing a bit more research on this, it appears that some internal Google reasons prevented cancelable promises from coming into the standard.
Further more, there was some promise with Bluebird which introduces cancelable promises, but it does not work in Expo or at least I haven't seen an example of it working in Expo.
The accepted answer is the best. Since I use TypeScript I had adapted the code with a few modifications (I explicitly set the dependencies since the accepted answer's implicit dependencies appear to give a re-render loop on my app, added and use async/await rather than promise chain, pass a ref to the mounted object so that an async/await chain can be canceled earlier if needed)
/**
* This starts an async function and executes another function that performs
* React state changes if the component is still mounted after the async
* operation completes
* #template T
* #param {(mountedRef: React.MutableRefObject<boolean>) => Promise<T>} asyncFunction async function,
* it has a copy of the mounted ref so an await chain can be canceled earlier.
* #param {(asyncResult: T) => void} onSuccess this gets executed after async
* function is resolved and the component is still mounted
* #param {import("react").DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useAsyncSetEffect(asyncFunction, onSuccess, deps) {
const mountedRef = useRef(false);
useEffect(() => {
mountedRef.current = true;
(async () => {
const x = await asyncFunction(mountedRef);
if (mountedRef.current) {
onSuccess(x);
}
})();
return () => {
mountedRef.current = false;
};
}, deps);
}
Original answer
Since I have many different operations that are async, I use the cancelable-promise package to resolve this issue with minimal code changes.
Previous code:
useEffect(() =>
(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})(),
[]
);
New code:
import { cancelable } from "cancelable-promise";
...
useEffect(
() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(async () => {
const bar = await fooAsync();
setSomeState(bar);
})
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
},
[]
);
You can alsowrpte it in a custom utility function like this
/**
* This wraps an async function in a cancelable promise
* #param {() => PromiseLike<void>} asyncFunction
* #param {React.DependencyList} deps
*/
export function useCancelableEffect(asyncFunction, deps) {
useEffect(() => {
const cancelablePromise = cancelable(asyncFunction());
return () => cancelablePromise.cancel();
}, deps);
}
In my case of a login-like screen, the fetch was done in a onClick handler of a parent component, who passed that handler down to the child, whom placed .catch and .finally on it.
In the .then case a redirect (and hence unmount) would happen as normal operation, and only in cases of fetch error would the child stay mounted on-screen.
My solution was moving the setState and all other code from the .finally to the .catch since the child is guaranteed to be mounted in the .catch case. And in the .then case nothing needed doing because of the guaranteed unmount.
Based on #ford04 answer, here is the same encapsulated in a method :
import React, { FC, useState, useEffect, DependencyList } from 'react';
export function useEffectAsync( effectAsyncFun : ( isMounted: () => boolean ) => unknown, deps?: DependencyList ) {
useEffect( () => {
let isMounted = true;
const _unused = effectAsyncFun( () => isMounted );
return () => { isMounted = false; };
}, deps );
}
Usage:
const MyComponent : FC<{}> = (props) => {
const [ asyncProp , setAsyncProp ] = useState( '' ) ;
useEffectAsync( async ( isMounted ) =>
{
const someAsyncProp = await ... ;
if ( isMounted() )
setAsyncProp( someAsyncProp ) ;
});
return <div> ... ;
} ;
Depending on how you open your webpage, you may not be causing a mounting. Such as using a <Link/> back to a page that was already mounted in the virtual DOM, so requiring data from a componentDidMount lifecycle is caught.
Here is a simple solution for this. This warning is due to when we do some fetch request while that request is in the background (because some requests take some time.)and we navigate back from that screen then they react cannot update the state. here is the example code for this. write this line before every state Update.
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
Here is the Complete Code
import React , {useRef} from 'react'
import { Text,StatusBar,SafeAreaView,ScrollView, StyleSheet } from 'react-native'
import BASEURL from '../constants/BaseURL';
const SearchScreen = () => {
const isScreenMounted = useRef(true)
useEffect(() => {
return () => isScreenMounted.current = false
},[])
const ConvertFileSubmit = () => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(true)
var formdata = new FormData();
var file = {
uri: `file://${route.params.selectedfiles[0].uri}`,
type:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].minetype}`,
name:`${route.params.selectedfiles[0].displayname}`,
};
formdata.append("file",file);
fetch(`${BASEURL}/UploadFile`, {
method: 'POST',
body: formdata,
redirect: 'manual'
}).then(response => response.json())
.then(result => {
if(!isScreenMounted.current) return;
setUpLoading(false)
}).catch(error => {
console.log('error', error)
});
}
return(
<>
<StatusBar barStyle="dark-content" />
<SafeAreaView>
<ScrollView
contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior="automatic"
style={styles.scrollView}>
<Text>Search Screen</Text>
</ScrollView>
</SafeAreaView>
</>
)
}
export default SearchScreen;
const styles = StyleSheet.create({
scrollView: {
backgroundColor:"red",
},
container:{
flex:1,
justifyContent:"center",
alignItems:"center"
}
})
I solved this problem by providing all the params that are used in the useEffect hook
The code reported the bug:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId]);
The code after fix:
useEffect(() => {
getDistrict({
geonameid: countryId,
subdistrict: level,
}).then((res) => {
......
});
}, [countryId,level]);
Can see that , problems solved after I provided all the params(including the level param) that supposed to pass through.
I had a similar problem and solved it :
I was automatically making the user logged-in by dispatching an action on redux
( placing authentication token on redux state )
and then I was trying to show a message with this.setState({succ_message: "...")
in my component.
Component was looking empty with the same error on console : "unmounted component".."memory leak" etc.
After I read Walter's answer up in this thread
I've noticed that in the Routing table of my application ,
my component's route wasn't valid if user is logged-in :
{!this.props.user.token &&
<div>
<Route path="/register/:type" exact component={MyComp} />
</div>
}
I made the Route visible whether the token exists or not.
In my case the issue was that the parent component was hidding the child because of a condition change in the child component.
So what I did was to change the condition so the child component was always shown.
What was happening:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
if (someCondition) {
return null;
}
return (
<>
Some cool text here
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
const ChildModalComponent: FC = () => {
...
const handleSubmit = () => {
setSomeCondition(true);
}
}
So after clicking submit the modal was automatically hidden becasue of the parent condition (someCondition).
How did I fix it?
I changed the place where the someCondition was checked in the Parent component, so the child component was always shown:
const ParentComponent:FC = () => {
...
return (
<>
{!someCondition && <>Some cool text here</>
<ChildModalComponent message="this is a cool modal" />
</>
)
}
I faced same warning, not it is fixed. To fix the issue, I removed the useRef() variable check in useEffect()
Earlier, the code was
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, []);
Now, the code is
const varRef = useRef();
useEffect(() => {
//if (!varRef.current)
{
}
}, [])
Hope, it helps...
Inspired by the accepted answer by #ford04 I had even better approach dealing with it, instead of using useEffect inside useAsync create a new function that returns a callback for componentWillUnmount :
function asyncRequest(asyncRequest, onSuccess, onError, onComplete) {
let isMounted=true
asyncRequest().then((data => isMounted ? onSuccess(data):null)).catch(onError).finally(onComplete)
return () => {isMounted=false}
}
...
useEffect(()=>{
return asyncRequest(()=>someAsyncTask(arg), response=> {
setSomeState(response)
},onError, onComplete)
},[])
const handleClick = async (item: NavheadersType, index: number) => {
const newNavHeaders = [...navheaders];
if (item.url) {
await router.push(item.url); =>>>> line causing error (causing route to happen)
// router.push(item.url); =>>> coreect line
newNavHeaders.forEach((item) => (item.active = false));
newNavHeaders[index].active = true;
setnavheaders([...newNavHeaders]);
}
};
The simplest and most compact solution (with an explanation) is seen below as a one-liner solution.
useEffect(() => { return () => {}; }, []);
The useEffect() example above returns a callback function triggers React to finish its unmount portion of its life-cycle prior to updating state.
That very simplistic solution is all that is needed. In addition, it also works unlike the fictional syntax provided by #ford04 and #sfletche . By the way, the below code snippet from #ford04 is purely imaginary syntax (#sfletche , #vinod , #guneetgstar , and #Drew Cordano used the very same imaginary syntax).
data => {       <--- Fictional/Imaginary Syntax
someAsyncOperation().then(data => {
if (isMounted) setState(data); // add conditional check
})
All of my linters and all the linters of my entire team will not accept it and they report Uncaught SyntaxError: unexpected token: '=>'. I am surprised that no one caught the imaginary syntax. Would anyone who has participated in this question-thread, particularly among the up-voters, explain to me how they got the solutions to work for them?
Inspired by #ford04 answer I use this hook, which also takes callbacks for success, errors, finally and an abortFn:
export const useAsync = (
asyncFn,
onSuccess = false,
onError = false,
onFinally = false,
abortFn = false
) => {
useEffect(() => {
let isMounted = true;
const run = async () => {
try{
let data = await asyncFn()
if (isMounted && onSuccess) onSuccess(data)
} catch(error) {
if (isMounted && onError) onSuccess(error)
} finally {
if (isMounted && onFinally) onFinally()
}
}
run()
return () => {
if(abortFn) abortFn()
isMounted = false
};
}, [asyncFn, onSuccess])
}
If the asyncFn is doing some kind of fetch from back-end it often makes sense to abort it when the component is unmounted (not always though, sometimes if ie. you're loading some data into a store you might as well just want to finish it even if component is unmounted)

Jest & Enzyme | Test PropTypes Function in componentDidMount

I have this code in my component, that takes listUsers, as a required PropType func. I want to test that in the componentDidMount(), it should be called only once.
Component Code:
static propTypes = {
securityMode: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
listUsers: PropTypes.func.isRequired
};
componentDidMount() {
const { listUsers } = this.props;
listUsers();
}
onCreateUserSucess= response => {
this.setState({ isCreateUserModalOpen: false });
const { listUsers, notify } = this.props;
listUsers();
this.closeCreateUserModal();
notify({
title: 'Created User',
message: `User ${response.username} was added to group: ${response.group}`,
status: STATUS.success,
dismissible: true,
dismissAfter: 3000
});
};
I get an error, saying that spyOn can only be appliead to functions. Can someone help me to test the. componentDidMount and onCreateUserSucess. I even tried to mock the functions but I always get failings.
Testing componentDidMount is pretty simple. Let's suppose that the component you created above is called UsersDisplayer.
class UsersDisplayer extends Component {
constructor(props) {
// ...
}
// The code above goes here.
}
In order to test whether the listUsers function runs or not, you should do something similar to this:
// Import React, shallow and UsersDisplayer at the top.
describe('<UsersDisplayer />', () => {
let usersDisplayerWrapper;
let listUsers;
beforeEach(() => {
listUsers = jest.fn();
usersDisplayerWrapper = <UsersDisplayer listUsers={listUsers} />;
});
describe('componentDidMount', () => {
it('calls listUsers props function', () => {
// The `componentDidMount` lifecycle method is called during the rendering of the component within the `beforeEach` block, that runs before each test suites.
expect(listUsers).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
describe('onCreateUserSucess', () => {
it('calls listUsers props function', () => {
// Create a dummy `response` data that will be passed to the function.
const response = {
username: 'username',
group: 'group'
};
// Simply just call the function of the instance.
usersDisplayerWrapper.instance().onCreateUserSucess(response);
expect(listUsers).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
});

checking a component is rendered without setting state in enzyme - using fetch

i am trying to run a basic application, i am calling an api which is running in node layer. i am using proxy in package.json of react application, thats why i call fetch with relative url.
node is running in port 4000 and react is running in 3000.
so when i call api after success i will change the state of loading to false , initially when api call request happens loader will come since loading is true after that DataComponent will come on success.
Basically initital loading will be false after response comes setting it to false to load DataComponent
Here i am not able to see the DataComponent, How can i check the DataComponent is rendered.
// app.js
class App extends Component {
state = {
loading: true,
data: null
}
componentDidMount() {
this.fetchData();
}
fetchData = async() => {
const jsonRes = await fetch("/api/user");
const data = await jsonRes.json();
this.setState({
loading: false,
data
})
}
render() {
if (this.state.loading) {
return ( <
div className = "laoder-container" > < Loader / > < /div>
)
} else {
return ( <
DataComponent data = {
this.state.data
}
/>
)
}
}
}
//app.test.js
import React from 'react'
import App from './App';
import {
mount
} from 'enzyme'
describe('app.js', () => {
it('should render the app component once data is there', () => {
global.fetch = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
var p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve({
ok: true,
json: function() {
return {
userName: 'John',
surName: 'Doe'
}
}
});
});
return p;
});
})
const wrapper = mount( < App / > )
expect(fetch).toBeCalled();
wrapper.update();
console.log(wrapper.debug()) // not showing the Data component
})
The problem is that the fetch is happening asynchronously. By the time you call wrapper.debug() the state hasn't been able to update, because the fetch response has been put on the event stack. So the fetch has been called, but it hasn't returned any response.
You can see this by updating the test to something like this:
// mock out fetch...
const wrapper = mount(<App />);
expect(fetch).toBeCalled();
setTimeout(() => {
wrapper.update();
console.log(wrapper.debug()); // should be showing the Data component now
}, 0);
That allows the promise callbacks to be called before trying to see the rendered markup by placing the update/debug code at the end of the event stack.
You could wrap that setTimeout in a promise to return from the it callback function, and place any expects inside of it before you resolve (otherwise it may never actually run the expect functions before the test ends).
// mock out fetch...
const wrapper = mount(<App />);
expect(fetch).toBeCalled();
return new Promise((resolve) => {
setTimeout(() => {
wrapper.update();
console.log(wrapper.debug()); // should be showing the Data component now
expect(...)
resolve();
}, 0);
});
An alternative would be to just test that the result of the data renders what you are expecting when the state has particular data:
it("should render the app component once data is there", () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<App />);
wrapper.setState({
loading: false,
data: {
userName: "John",
surName: "Doe"
}
});
console.log(wrapper.debug()); // You'll see the DataComponent
});

How to test componentDidMount conditionally making API calls

I'm using React in my application. I'm making an API call in my componentDidMount but it is conditional. My code in component is
componentDidMount() {
if (!this.props.fetch) {
fetchAPICall()
.then(() => {
/** Do something **/
});
}
}
I've written test as :
it('should not fetch ', () => {
const TFCRender = mount(<Component fetch />);
const didMountSpy = jest.spyOn(TFCRender.prototype, 'componentDidMount');
expect(didMountSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(fetchAPICall).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
});
The test is throwing me error as
TypeError: Cannot read property 'componentDidMount' of undefined
What am I doing wrong and what is the right way to test such case.
From the official docs, you need to spy the component before mounting it.
Following is a working example that I have created with create-react-app. I've also added some comments in the example code:
App.js
import { fetchAPICall } from './api';
class App extends Component {
componentDidMount() {
if (!this.props.fetch) {
fetchAPICall().then(console.log);
}
}
render() {
return <div>Testing the result</div>;
}
}
export default App;
api.js
export const fetchAPICall = () => {
return Promise.resolve('Getting some data from the API endpoint');
};
App.test.js
import Component from './App';
import * as apis from './api'; // assuming you have a separate file for these APIs
// Mock the fetchAPICall, and since the data fetching is asynchronous
// you have to mock its implementation with Promise.resolve()`
apis.fetchAPICall = jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve('test'));
describe('spyOn', () => {
let didMountSpy; // Reusing the spy, and clear it with mockClear()
afterEach(() => {
didMountSpy.mockClear();
});
didMountSpy = jest.spyOn(Component.prototype, 'componentDidMount');
test('should not fetch ', () => {
// Ensure the componentDidMount haven't called yet.
expect(didMountSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
const TFCRender = mount(<Component fetch />);
expect(didMountSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(apis.fetchAPICall).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
});
test('should fetch', () => {
expect(didMountSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0);
const TFCRender = mount(<Component fetch={false} />);
expect(didMountSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(apis.fetchAPICall).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
});
Not sure if this is the best practice, but this is how I usually write my own tests.
Hope this help!

How to use enzyme to test component with asyn lifecircle function?

I'm using jest and enzyme to test my component. And in this component, I will request data in componentDidMount, and then it will render view with the data.
class App extends React.Component {
async componentDidMount() {
const data = await getData(); // send a request to server to get data
this.setState({
name: data.name,
})
}
render() {
return (
<div>{this.state.name}</div>
)
}
}
It is a very simple component, just only use async function in componentDidMount, and get data width a async way, not callback. But, I don't know how to test this component.
I'd like write test code like this
it('render', async () => {
const container = mount(
<App />
);
const instance = container.instance();
console.log(instanct.state.name); // of course, state.name is undefined, but I want in this place, the state.name can be 'qyt'
});
I created a demo project on Github here.
The solution I went with was to mock the getData module:
let mockPromise;
jest.mock("./getData", () => {
return jest.fn(() => {
mockPromise = Promise.resolve({ name: "Spider man" });
return mockPromise;
});
});
Then I returned the mockPromise in my test. Jest will wait for the promise to resolve before completing the test.
it("renders without crashing", () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<App />);
return mockPromise.then((a) => {
wrapper.update();
expect(wrapper.html()).toEqual(`<h1>Name: Spider man</h1>`);
});
});

Categories