I receive an object that looks like this:
this.tokensData = {
O: {
id: 0,
name: value1,
organization: organization1,
...,
},
1: {
id: 1,
name: value1,
organization: organization1,
...,
},
2: {
id: 2,
name: value2,
organization: organization2,
...,
},
...
}
I want to filter by id and remove the Object which id matches the id I receive from the store. What I tried so far:
const filteredObject = Object.keys(this.tokensData).map((token) => {
if (this.$store.state.id !== this.tokensData[token].id) {
return this.tokensData[token];
}
});
This replaces the Object with undefined - which would work for my purposes but is obviously not ideal.
Any help is much appreciated!
Try to use Object.entries and then Object.fromEntries() to create an object from a list of key-value pairs:
let store = [0 , 1];
const result = Object.entries(tokensData).filter(([k, v]) => !store.some(s => s == v.id));
console.log(Object.fromEntries(result));
An example:
let tokensData = {
O: {
id: 0,
name: '',
organization: '',
},
1: {
id: 1,
name: '',
organization: '',
},
2: {
id: 2,
name: '',
organization: '',
}
}
let store = [0 , 1];
const result = Object.entries(tokensData).filter(([k, v]) => !store.some(s => s == v.id));
console.log(Object.fromEntries(result));
You can do this by using Object.entries and Object.fromEntries:
const filteredObject = Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(this.tokensData).filter(
([key, value]) => value.id !== this.$store.state.id
)
)
This can be done by cloning the object and removing the object at the ID:
const removeObjectByID = (obj, id) => {
// first create a copy of the object
const copy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
// next, delete the one entry you don't want
delete copy[id]
// finally, return the new object
return copy
}
// Test
const data = {a:1, b: 2, c: 3}
console.log(removeObjectByID(data, 'b')) // { a: 1, c: 3 }
The problem with undefined is caused by using this in your arrow function. Javascript scoping gives a different meaning to this if the function is a arrow function.
Furthermore I suggest to use filter.
.map is used to transform A -> B.
.filter should be used to filter out objects.
Now if we combine that this would become something like this.
function filterById(token) {
return this.$store.state.id !== this.tokensData[token].id;
}
function getTokenData(token) {
return this.tokensData[token]
}
const token = Object.keys(this.tokensData)
.filter(filterById)
.map(getTokenData);
});
Please note that I'm not using arrow functions. Arrow function can't refer to this due to the way javascript handles scoping.
An alternative approach could be to reference this into a variable, so your arrow function can access the variable.
const self = this;
const token = Object.keys(this.tokensData)
.filter(token => self.$store.state.id !== self.tokensData[token].id)
.map(token => self.tokensData[token]);
Too make it even nicer you could utilize Object.entries. This will return an array of key and value, which you can destructure using es6 syntax as following [key, value].
const self = this;
const token = Object.entries(this.tokensData)
.filter(([key, value]) => self.$store.state.id !== value.id)
.map(([key, value]) => value);
Related
I have an Array of objects and one object
const filterArray = [{bestTimeToVisit: 'Before 10am'}, {bestDayToVisit: Monday}]
This values are setting in a reducer and the payload will be like
{bestTimeToVisit: 'After 10am'}
or
{bestDayToVisit: Tuesday}.
So what I need is when I get a payload {bestTimeToVisit: 'After 10am'} and if bestTimeToVisit not in filterList array, then add this value to the filterList array.
And if bestTimeToVisit already in the array with different value, then replace the value of that object with same key
if(filterArray.hasOwnProperty("bestTimeToVisit")) {
filterArray["bestTimeToVisit"] = payload["bestTimeToVisit"];
} else {
filterArray.push({"bestTimeToVisit": payload["bestTimeToVisit"]});
}
I convert the object array into a regular object and then back into an object array. makes things less complicated. I'm making the assumption each object coming back only has one key/value and that order doesnt matter.
const objectArraytoObject = (arr) =>
arr.reduce((acc, item) => {
const key = [Object.keys(item)[0]];
return { ...acc, [key]: item[key] };
}, {});
const newValues = [{ someKey: 'something' }, { bestDayToVisit: 'Tuesday' }];
const filterArray = [
{ bestTimeToVisit: 'Before 10am' },
{ bestDayToVisit: 'Monday' },
];
const newValuesObj = objectArraytoObject(newValues);
const filterObj = objectArraytoObject(filterArray);
const combined = { ...filterObj, ...newValuesObj };
const combinedToArray = Object.keys(combined).map((key) => ({
[key]: combined[key],
}));
console.log(combinedToArray);
Need to iterate over the array and find objects that satisfy for modification or addition if none are found.
function checkReduced(filterrray,valueToCheck="After 10am"){
let isNotFound =true;
for(let timeItem of filterrray) {
if(timeItem.bestTimeToVisit && timeItem.bestTimeToVisit !== valueToCheck) {
timeItem.bestTimeToVisit=valueToCheck;
isNotFound=false;
break;
}
}
if(isNotFound){filterrray.push({bestTimeToVisit:valueToCheck})}
}
const filterArray = [{bestDayToVisit: "Monday"}];
checkReduced(filterArray,"After 9am");//calling the function
const updateOrAdd = (arr, newItem) => {
// get the new item key
const newItemKey = Object.keys(newItem)[0];
// get the object have the same key
const find = arr.find(item => Object.keys(item).includes(newItemKey));
if(find) { // the find object is a reference type
find[newItemKey] = newItem[newItemKey]; // update the value
} else {
arr.push(newItem); // push new item if there is no object have the same key
}
return arr;
}
// tests
updateOrAdd([{ a: 1 }], { b: 2 }) // => [{ a: 1 }, { b: 2 }]
updateOrAdd([{ a: 1 }], { a: 2 }) // => [{ a: 2 }]
Use Case 1
Assuming i have 2dArray Object of
let arr = [{'getName':'Report1'},{'getName':'User'},{'getName':'report 2'},{'getName':'User'},{'getName':'User'}]
let _NotRequiredSheet = ['User','Report 254',...]
Im trying to optimise my script with functional programming which will return me an array of
['report1','report2']
The current Method im using which does not have any error is :
for(let i =0;i < arr.length;i++){
if(arr[i].getName != _NotRequiredSheet[0]){
console.log(arr[i].getName)
}
}
But this will impact if _notrequiredSheet have a big list of what is not required
I tried using this approach which is using filter but since its 2dObject Array, im unsure how should this be implemented.
What i did on my poc is
//Approach 1 : Not Working
let result = arr.filter(function (arr) {
return arr.getName != _NotRequiredSheet.values();
})
//Output should be as 1dArray['report1','report2'] , not (5) [{…}, {…}, {…}, {…}, {…}]
console.log(result)
//Approach 2 : Will output as 2D array with filtered value
// Will require to hardcord the index which is not advisable
let result = arr.filter(function (arr) {
return arr.getName != _NotRequiredSheet[0];
})
console.log(result)
i wanted to check if there is any way i could pass on using for loop with filter function. Result should return as 1D array which is
['Report1','Report2']
Use case 1 is Solved
Use Case 2 : 2D Object Array
Assuming data is declared as
let arr2 = [
{$0:{'Name':'Report1'}},
{$0:{'Name':'Report2'}},
{$0:{'Name':'User'}}
]
Result should show this on console.log (2) [{…}, {…}] , filter function will remove 'User' as its reflected in _NotRequiredSheet.
Using the syntax i wrote
let result = arr2.map(item => item.$0.Name).filter(Name => !_NotRequiredSheet.includes(Name))
This will return as a single array
You could filter your data with looking for unwanted values and map only the wanted property.
const
data = [{ getName: 'Report1' }, { getName: 'User' }, { getName: 'report 2' }, { getName: 'User' }, { getName: 'User' }],
_NotRequiredSheet = ['User', 'Report 254'],
result = data
.filter(({ getName }) => !_NotRequiredSheet.includes(getName))
.map(({ getName }) => getName);
console.log(result);
With a Set
const
data = [{ getName: 'Report1' }, { getName: 'User' }, { getName: 'report 2' }, { getName: 'User' }, { getName: 'User' }],
_NotRequiredSheet = ['User', 'Report 254'],
take = k => o => o[k],
hasNot = s => v => !s.has(v),
comp = f => g => o => f(g(o)),
result = data
.filter(
comp(hasNot(new Set(_NotRequiredSheet)))(take('getName'))
)
.map(({ getName }) => getName);
console.log(result);
I'd recommend using reduce()
so you can return something based on _NotRequiredSheet.includes(cur.getName)
let arr = [{'getName':'Report1'},{'getName':'User'},{'getName':'report 2'},{'getName':'User'},{'getName':'User'}]
let _NotRequiredSheet = ['User','Report 254' ];
let res = arr.reduce((prev, cur) => {
if (_NotRequiredSheet.includes(cur.getName)) {
return prev;
} else {
return [ ...prev, cur.getName ];
}
}, []);
console.log(res);
I have a list of object
let table = [{id:4,val:"21321"},{id:5,val:"435345"},{id:6,val:"345345"}]
I want to rename the id value after removing an object from the list which has a specific id value(for example id:5)
I am using array filter method
table.filter((element,index)=>{
if(element.id!==5){
element.id=index
return element
}else{
index+1
}
return null
})
I am expecting a return value
[{id: 0,val: "21321"},{id: 1,val: "345345"}]
but i am getting this
[{id: 0, val: "21321"},{id: 2, val: "345345"}]
Note: I know i can use filter method to remove the specific object and than use map method to rename the id value but i want a solution where i have to use only one arrow function
You can use array#reduce to update the indexes and remove elements with given id. For the matched id element, simply return the accumulator and for other, add new object with val and updated id.
const data = [{ id: 4, val: "21321" }, { id: 5, val: "435345" }, { id: 6, val: "345345" }],
result = data.reduce((res, {id, val}) => {
if(id === 5) {
return res;
}
res.push({id: res.length + 1, val});
return res;
}, []);
console.log(result)
This would do it:
let table = [[{id:4,val:"21321"},{id:5,val:"435345"},{id:6,val:"345345"}]];
let res=table[0].reduce((a,c)=>{if(c.id!=5){
c.id=a.length;
a.push(c)
}
return a}, []);
console.log([res])
The only way to do it with "a single arrow function" is using .reduce().
Here is an extremely shortened (one-liner) version of the same:
let res=table[0].reduce((a,c)=>(c.id!=5 && a.push(c.id=a.length,c),a),[]);
Actually, I was a bit premature with my remark about the "only possible solution". Here is a modified version of your approach using .filter() in combination with an IIFE ("immediately invoked functional expression"):
table = [[{id:4,val:"21321"},{id:5,val:"435345"},{id:6,val:"345345"}]];
res= [ (i=>table[0].filter((element,index)=>{
if(element.id!==5){
element.id=i++
return element
} }))(0) ];
console.log(res)
This IIFE is a simple way of introducing a persistent local variable i without polluting the global name space. But, stricly speaking, by doing that I have introduced a second "arrow function" ...
It probably is not the best practice to use filter and also alter the objects at the same time. But you would need to keep track of the count as you filter.
let table = [[{id:4,val:"21321"},{id:5,val:"435345"},{id:6,val:"345345"}]]
const removeReorder = (data, id) => {
var count = 0;
return data.filter(obj => {
if (obj.id !== id) {
obj.id = count++;
return true;
}
return false;
});
}
console.log(removeReorder(table[0], 5));
It is possible to achieve desired result by using reduce method:
const result = table.reduce((a, c) => {
let nestedArray = [];
c.forEach(el => {
if (el.id != id)
nestedArray.push({ id: nestedArray.length, val: el.val });
});
a.push(nestedArray);
return a;
}, [])
An example:
let table = [[{ id: 4, val: "21321" }, { id: 5, val: "435345" }, { id: 6, val: "345345" }]]
let id = 5;
const result = table.reduce((a, c) => {
let nestedArray = [];
c.forEach(el => {
if (el.id != id)
nestedArray.push({ id: nestedArray.length, val: el.val });
});
a.push(nestedArray);
return a;
}, [])
console.log(result);
The main issue in your code is filter method is not returning boolean value. Use the filter method to filter items and then use map to alter object.
let table = [
[
{ id: 4, val: "21321" },
{ id: 5, val: "435345" },
{ id: 6, val: "345345" },
],
];
const res = table[0]
.filter(({ id }) => id !== 5)
.map(({ val }, i) => ({ id: i, val }));
console.log(res)
Alternatively, using forEach with one iteration
let table = [[{id:4,val:"21321"},{id:5,val:"435345"},{id:6,val:"345345"}]]
const res = [];
let i = 0;
table[0].forEach(({id, val}) => id !== 5 && res.push({id: i++, val}));
console.log(res)
const orignalArr = [
{
personName: 'Joe'
}
]
expected output:
const convertedArr = [
{
name: 'Joe'
}
]
I'm thinking the renamed keys are defined in an object (but fine if there's a better way to map them):
const keymaps = {
personName: 'name'
};
How can I do this with Ramda?
Something with R.map
There is an entry in Ramda's Cookbook for this:
const renameKeys = R.curry((keysMap, obj) =>
R.reduce((acc, key) => R.assoc(keysMap[key] || key, obj[key], acc), {}, R.keys(obj))
);
const originalArr = [{personName: 'Joe'}]
console .log (
R.map (renameKeys ({personName: 'name'}), originalArr)
)
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.26.1/ramda.js"></script>
But with the ubiquity of ES6, it's pretty easy to write this directly:
const renameKeys = (keysMap) => (obj) => Object.entries(obj).reduce(
(a, [k, v]) => k in keysMap ? {...a, [keysMap[k]]: v} : {...a, [k]: v},
{}
)
You can combine Ramda with Ramda Adjunct. Using the renameKeys (https://char0n.github.io/ramda-adjunct/2.27.0/RA.html#.renameKeys) method is very useful. With it you can simply do something like this:
const people = [
{
personName: 'Joe'
}
]
const renameKeys = R.map(RA.renameKeys({ personName: 'name' }));
const __people__ = renameKeys(people);
console.log(__people__) // [ { name: 'Joe' }]
Hope it helped you :)
This is my take on renameKeys. The main idea is to separate the keys and values to two array. Map the array of keys, and replace with values from keyMap (if exist), then zip back to object:
const { pipe, toPairs, transpose, converge, zipObj, head, map, last } = R
const renameKeys = keysMap => pipe(
toPairs, // convert to entries
transpose, // convert to array of keys, and array of values
converge(zipObj, [ // zip back to object
pipe(head, map(key => keysMap[key] || key)), // rename the keys
last // get the values
])
)
const originalArr = [{ personName: 'Joe', lastName: 'greg' }]
const result = R.map(renameKeys({ personName: 'name' }), originalArr)
console.log(result)
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.26.1/ramda.js"></script>
My idea to make it is to first check that the old prop I want to rename exists, and the new key I want to create doesn’t.
Then, I will use the S_ common combinator to make it point-free.
Find JS common combinators here
const {
allPass, assoc, compose: B, complement, has, omit, prop, when
} = require('ramda');
const S_ = (f) => (g) => (x) => f (g (x)) (x);
const renameKey = (newKey) => (oldKey) => when(allPass([
has(oldKey)
, complement(has)(newKey)
]))
(B(omit([oldKey]), S_(assoc(newKey))(prop(oldKey))))
const obj = { fullname: 'Jon' };
renameKey('name')('fullname')(obj) // => { name: ‘Jon’ }
Here is my own solution, not too many arrow functions (just one), mostly pure Ramda calls. And it is one of shortest, if not the shortest ;)
First, based on your example
const { apply, compose, either, flip, identity, map, mergeAll, objOf, prop, replace, toPairs, useWith } = require('ramda');
const RenameKeys = f => compose(mergeAll, map(apply(useWith(objOf, [f]))), toPairs);
const originalArr = [
{
personName: 'Joe',
},
];
const keymaps = {
personName: 'name',
};
// const HowToRename = flip(prop)(keymaps); // if you don't have keys not specified in keymaps explicitly
const HowToRename = either(flip(prop)(keymaps), identity);
console.log(map(RenameKeys(HowToRename))(originalArr));
Second option, using any arbitrary lambda with renaming rules:
const { apply, compose, map, mergeAll, objOf, replace, toPairs, useWith } = require('ramda');
const RenameKeys = f => compose(mergeAll, map(apply(useWith(objOf, [f]))), toPairs);
const HowToRename = replace(/(?<=.)(?!$)/g, '_'); // for example
console.log(RenameKeys(HowToRename)({ one: 1, two: 2, three: 3 }));
Yields
{ o_n_e: 1, t_w_o: 2, t_h_r_e_e: 3 }
Third, you can use object-based rename rules from the first example and use fallback strategy, e.g. replace like in the second example, instead of identity.
I am using Redux. In my reducer I'm trying to remove a property from an object like this:
const state = {
a: '1',
b: '2',
c: {
x: '42',
y: '43'
},
}
And I want to have something like this without having to mutate the original state:
const newState = {
a: '1',
b: '2',
c: {
x: '42',
},
}
I tried:
let newState = Object.assign({}, state);
delete newState.c.y
but for some reasons, it deletes the property from both states.
Could help me to do that?
How about using destructuring assignment syntax?
const original = {
foo: 'bar',
stack: 'overflow',
};
// If the name of the property to remove is constant
const { stack, ...withoutFirst } = original;
console.log(withoutFirst); // Will be { "foo": "bar" }
// If the name of the property to remove is from a variable
const key = 'stack'
const { [key]: value, ...withoutSecond } = original;
console.log(withoutSecond); // Will be { "foo": "bar" }
// To do a deep removal with property names from variables
const deep = {
foo: 'bar',
c: {
x: 1,
y: 2
}
};
const parentKey = 'c';
const childKey = 'y';
// Remove the 'c' element from original
const { [parentKey]: parentValue, ...noChild } = deep;
// Remove the 'y' from the 'c' element
const { [childKey]: removedValue, ...childWithout } = parentValue;
// Merge back together
const withoutThird = { ...noChild, [parentKey]: childWithout };
console.log(withoutThird); // Will be { "foo": "bar", "c": { "x": 1 } }
I find ES5 array methods like filter, map and reduce useful because they always return new arrays or objects. In this case I'd use Object.keys to iterate over the object, and Array#reduce to turn it back into an object.
return Object.assign({}, state, {
c: Object.keys(state.c).reduce((result, key) => {
if (key !== 'y') {
result[key] = state.c[key];
}
return result;
}, {})
});
You can use _.omit(object, [paths]) from lodash library
path can be nested for example: _.omit(object, ['key1.key2.key3'])
Just use ES6 object destructuring feature
const state = {
c: {
x: '42',
y: '43'
},
}
const { c: { y, ...c } } = state // generates a new 'c' without 'y'
console.log({...state, c }) // put the new c on a new state
That's because you are copying the value of state.c to the other object. And that value is a pointer to another javascript object. So, both of those pointers are pointing to the same object.
Try this:
let newState = Object.assign({}, state);
console.log(newState == state); // false
console.log(newState.c == state.c); // true
newState.c = Object.assign({}, state.c);
console.log(newState.c == state.c); // now it is false
delete newState.c.y;
You can also do a deep-copy of the object. See this question and you'll find what's best for you.
How about this:
function removeByKey (myObj, deleteKey) {
return Object.keys(myObj)
.filter(key => key !== deleteKey)
.reduce((result, current) => {
result[current] = myObj[current];
return result;
}, {});
}
It filters the key that should be deleted then builds a new object from the remaining keys and the initial object. The idea is stolen from Tyler McGinnes awesome reactjs program.
JSBin
function dissoc(key, obj) {
let copy = Object.assign({}, obj)
delete copy[key]
return copy
}
Also, if looking for a functional programming toolkit, look at Ramda.
As of 2019, another option is to use the Object.fromEntries method. It has reached stage 4.
const newC = Object.fromEntries(
Object.entries(state.c).filter(([key]) => key != 'y')
)
const newState = {...state, c: newC}
The nice thing about it is that it handles integer keys nicely.
You may use Immutability helper in order to unset an attribute, in your case:
import update from 'immutability-helper';
const updatedState = update(state, {
c: {
$unset: ['y']
}
});
It's easy with Immutable.js:
const newState = state.deleteIn(['c', 'y']);
description of deleteIn()
Here's an easy 1-liner you can use that allows you to partially apply the prop you want to remove. This makes it easy to pass to Array.map.
const removeProp = prop => ({ [prop]: _, ...rest }) => ({ ...rest })
Now you can use it like this:
const newArr = oldArr.map(removeProp('deleteMe'))
The issue you are having is that you are not deep cloning your initial state. So you have a shallow copy.
You could use spread operator
const newState = { ...state, c: { ...state.c } };
delete newState.c.y
Or following your same code
let newState = Object.assign({}, state, { c: Object.assign({}, state.c) });
delete newState.c.y
I normally use
Object.assign({}, existingState, {propToRemove: undefined})
I realise this isn't actually removing the property but for almost all purposes 1 its functionally equivalent. The syntax for this is much simpler than the alternatives which I feel is a pretty good tradeoff.
1 If you are using hasOwnProperty(), you will need to use the more complicated solution.
I use this pattern
const newState = Object.assign({}, state);
delete newState.show;
return newState;
but in book i saw another pattern
return Object.assign({}, state, { name: undefined } )
utility ;))
const removeObjectField = (obj, field) => {
// delete filter[selectName]; -> this mutates.
const { [field]: remove, ...rest } = obj;
return rest;
}
action type
const MY_Y_REMOVE = 'MY_Y_REMOVE';
action creator
const myYRemoveAction = (c, y) => {
const result = removeObjectField(c, y);
return dispatch =>
dispatch({
type: MY_Y_REMOVE,
payload: result
})
}
reducer
export default (state ={}, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case myActions.MY_Y_REMOVE || :
return { ...state, c: action.payload };
default:
return state;
}
};
As hinted in some of the answers already, it's because you are trying to modify a nested state ie. one level deeper. A canonical solution would be to add a reducer on the x state level:
const state = {
a: '1',
b: '2',
c: {
x: '42',
y: '43'
},
}
Deeper level reducer
let newDeepState = Object.assign({}, state.c);
delete newDeepState.y;
Original level reducer
let newState = Object.assign({}, state, {c: newDeepState});
Use a combination of Object.assign, JSON.parse and JSON.stringify
const obj1 = { a: "a", b: "b" };
const obj2 = { c: "c", a: undefined };
const merged = Object.assign({}, obj1, obj2);
const sanitized = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(merged));
console.log(sanitized); // -> { b: "b", c: "c" }