We Keep Coding

run function with uniquie value using javascript / node js

let object=
[
{
id:`01`,
name:`fish`,
type:null,
care:'owner',
},
{
id:`02`,
name:`fish`,
type:'fresh',
care:'peter',
},
{
id:`03`,
name:`fish`,
type:`fresh`,
care:'amy',
},
{
id:`04`,
name:`fish`,
type:`tank`,
care:'abc',
},
{
id:`05`,
name:`animal`,
type:`pet`,
care:'teen',
},,
{
id:`06`,
name:`animal`,
type:`pet`,
care:'ran',
},
{
id:`07`,
name:`animal`,
type:null,
care:'roh',
},
{
id:`08`,
name:`food`,
type:`veg`,
care:'test',
},
{
id:`09`,
name:`food`,
type:null,
care:'dop',
}
]
object.map((value)=>{
console.log(value.name)
// i am calling function here by passing value.name as a parameter
let gotValue = functionName(value.name);
// using type also
if(typeof value.type!=="string"){
// Do some task here with gotValue
}
})
I have this object and i am getting some value from it for ex getting name from it as i want to pass this name to function but the problem is due to repeat of data the function calling again and again is there any possibility i can run function inside map but with unique value any help ?
as my output is getting like this
fish
fish
fish
animal
animal
animal
and this value.name is passing inside my function so its repeating like this
functionName(fish);
functionName(fish);
functionName(fish);
functionName(animal);
functionName(animal);
functionName(animal);
multiple time function is running with same name and getting duplicate values
just need my function run with unique name
functionName(fish)
functionName(animal);
functionName(food);
as i want to stay inside map function because i am performing some task which can only be possible inside map that's why i need unique value

You can use Set which can be used to test if the object with value already exists or not. It will only call the function only once.
let object = [
{
id: `01`,
name: `fish`,
type: null,
},
{
id: `02`,
name: `fish`,
type: `fresh`,
},
{
id: `03`,
name: `fish`,
type: `tank`,
},
{
id: `04`,
name: `animal`,
type: `pet`,
},
{
id: `05`,
name: `animal`,
type: `wild`,
},
{
id: `06`,
name: `animal`,
type: null,
},
{
id: `07`,
name: `food`,
type: `veg`,
},
{
id: `08`,
name: `food`,
type: null,
},
];
const dict = new Set();
object.map((value) => {
if (!dict.has(value.name)) { // Run only if objet with name is not already existed in dict
dict.add(value.name);
console.log(value.name); // For testing
// functionName(value.name);
}
});
If you want to call the function with two filters then you can use some to find the elements in an array. See I've now declared dict as an array
let object = [{
id: `01`,
name: `fish`,
type: null,
},
{
id: `02`,
name: `fish`,
type: `fresh`,
},
{
id: `03`,
name: `fish`,
type: `tank`,
},
{
id: `04`,
name: `animal`,
type: `pet`,
},
{
id: `05`,
name: `animal`,
type: `wild`,
},
{
id: `06`,
name: `animal`,
type: null,
},
{
id: `07`,
name: `food`,
type: `veg`,
},
{
id: `08`,
name: `food`,
type: null,
},
{
id: `09`,
name: `food`,
type: null,
},
{
id: `10`,
name: `fish`,
type: `tank`,
},
];
const dict = [];
object.map((value) => {
const { name, type } = value;
if (!dict.some((obj) => obj.name === name && obj.type === type)) {
// Run only if objet with name is not already existed in dict
dict.push({ name, type });
console.log(name, type); // For testing
// functionName(value.name);
}
});
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

How to transfer field names to groups in a React json schema ui: groups nested object scenario

How to transfer field names to groups in a React json schema ui: groups nested object scenario. For example: object1.field1
I want to group the modelMetada and legancyMetaData objects given in the schema by selecting them from the properties inside.
The reason I want this is to show it by grouping it as I want in the tab.
const newSchema = {
$schema: 'http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#',
title: 'Physical Model',
type: 'object',
properties: {
modelMetadata: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
name: {
type: 'string',
title: 'Model Name',
description: 'Name of the Model',
},
displayName: {
type: 'string',
title: 'Model Display Name',
description: 'Display Name of the Model',
},
},
},
legacyMetaData: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
id: {
type: 'string',
title: 'Legacy ID',
description: 'ID of the Model in the Legacy System',
},
name: {
type: 'string',
title: 'Legacy Name',
description: 'Legacy Name of the Model',
},
},
},
},
};
const groups = [
{
modelMetadata: ['modelMetadata'],
legacyMetaData: ['legacyMetaData'],
customize: ['modelMetadata.displayName','legacyMetaData.name'], // ????
},
];
The code block I grouped
const doGrouping = ({ properties, groups, formContext }):any => {
const mapped = groups.map((g) => {
if (typeof g === 'string') {
const found = properties.filter((p) => p.name === g);
if (found.length === 1) {
const el = found[0];
return el.content;
}
return EXTRANEOUS;
} else if (typeof g === 'object') {
const { templates } = formContext;
const GroupComponent = templates
? templates[g['ui:template']]
: DefaultTemplate;
// #ts-ignore
const tempProperties = Object.keys(g).reduce((acc, key) => {
const field = g[key];
if (key.startsWith('ui:')) return acc;
if (!Array.isArray(field)) return acc;
return [
...acc,
{
name: key,
children: doGrouping({
properties,
formContext,
groups: field,
}),
},
];
}, []);
return <GroupComponent properties={tempProperties} />;
}
throw new Error(`Invalid object type: ${typeof g} ${g}`);
});
const remainder = mapped.filter((m) => m === REST);
if (remainder.length > 0) {
throw new Error('Remainder fields not supported');
}
return mapped;
};

Add tasks for todo list

I am trying to add tasks for each todo list that has a specific title.
Can I get a specific todo list by its id and add some tasks to it?
I am new to javascript, so I searched google about adding lists for a specific list with no results :(
class Model {
constructor() {}
this.todos = [
{
id: 1,
title: 'Outside',
text: 'Running',
complete: false,
tasks: [
{ id: 1, text: 'Run a marathon', complete: false},
{ id: 2, text: 'Run with freinds', complete: false}
]
},
{
id: 2,
title: 'Garden',
text: 'Plant',
complete: false,
tasks: [
{ id: 1, text: 'Plant a garden', complete: false},
{ id: 2, text: 'Water the garden', complete: false}
]
}];
addTodo(todoText) {
const todo = {
id: this.todos.length > 0 ? this.todos[this.todos.length - 1].id + 1 : 1,
text: todoText,
complete: false,
tasks: []
}
this.todos.push(todo)
}
}
Is it true to do like addTodo function for adding a tasks for a specific todo list like this?
addTodoTask(todoTaskText) {
const todoTask = {
id: this.todos.tasks.length > 0 ? this.todos[this.todos.tasks.length - 1].id + 1 : 1,
text: todoText,
complete: false,
}
this.todos.tasks.push(todoTask)
}
and how to add a list of a list in javascript like:
<ul>
<li>Running
<ul>
<li>Run a marathon</li>
<li>Run with freind</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

You could make each class handle rendering its own content and just map the list items consecutively while rendering from the top-down.
Edit: The render() methods make use of ES6 template literals. These are special strings that allow you embed variabes and expressions without the use of string concatenation.
const main = () => {
let todoList = new TodoList({ todos : getData() })
document.body.innerHTML = todoList.render()
}
class TodoTask {
constructor(options) {
this.id = options.id
this.text = options.text
this.complete = options.complete
}
render() {
return `<li>[${this.id}] ${this.text} (${this.complete})</li>`
}
}
class TodoEntry {
constructor(options) {
this.id = options.id
this.title = options.title
this.text = options.text
this.complete = options.complete
this.tasks = []
if (options.tasks) {
options.tasks.forEach(task => this.addTask(task))
}
}
addTask(task) {
this.tasks.push(new TodoTask(Object.assign({
id : (this.tasks.length || 0) + 1
}, task)))
}
render() {
return `<li>
[${this.id}] ${this.title} (${this.complete})
<ul>${this.tasks.map(task => task.render()).join('')}</ul>
</li>`
}
}
class TodoList {
constructor(options) {
this.todos = []
if (options.todos) {
options.todos.forEach(todo => this.addTodo(todo))
}
}
addTodo(todo) {
this.todos.push(new TodoEntry(Object.assign({
id : (this.todos.length || 0) + 1
}, todo)))
}
render() {
return `<ul>${this.todos.map(todo => todo.render()).join('')}</ul>`
}
}
function getData() {
return [{
id: 1,
title: 'Outside',
text: 'Running',
complete: false,
tasks: [{
id: 1,
text: 'Run a marathon',
complete: false
}, {
id: 2,
text: 'Run with freinds',
complete: false
}]
}, {
id: 2,
title: 'Garden',
text: 'Plant',
complete: false,
tasks: [{
id: 1,
text: 'Plant a garden',
complete: false
}, {
id: 2,
text: 'Water the garden',
complete: false
}]
}]
}
main() // entry

To add a task your todo, you should have a way of knowing which todo list you're updating. Like using the todo's id.
For example your addTaskToTodo will looks like so.
addTask(todoId, taskObject) {
// find that todos index
const todoIndex = this.todos.findIndex(todo => todo.id ===todoId);
// using that index update the tasks
this.todos[todoIndex].tasks.push(taskObject)
}
This assumes your taskObject already has all the properties. If you need to manually update its id, you can also do that before pushing by checking the length of the tasks and incrementing by 1.

I made an example of how to use dictionaries instead of arrays, and also a random ID. I think you will find it much cleaner and simpler:
class Model {
constructor() { }
todos = {
1: {
id: 1,
title: 'Outside',
text: 'Running',
complete: false,
tasks: {
1: { id: 1, text: 'Run a marathon', complete: false },
2: { id: 2, text: 'Run with freinds', complete: false }
}
},
2: {
id: 2,
title: 'Garden',
text: 'Plant',
complete: false,
tasks: {
1: { id: 1, text: 'Plant a garden', complete: false },
2: { id: 2, text: 'Water the garden', complete: false }
}
}
}
getRandomId = () => {
return '_' + Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9);
}
addTodo(todoText) {
const id = this.getRandomId();
const todo = {
id,
text: todoText,
complete: false,
tasks:{}
}
this.todos[id] = todo;
}
addTodoTask(todoTaskText,todoId) {//Pass also the id of the todo, to know where this task belongs to.
const id = this.getRandomId();
const todoTask = {
id,
text: todoTaskText,
complete: false,
}
this.todos[todoId].tasks[id] = todoTask
}
}
This way you could easily edit/remove both todos and tasks, just by their id, without using any messy Array.filter and such

Ramda.js Combine two array of objects that share the same property ID

I have these two array of objects
todos: [
{
id: 1,
name: 'customerReport',
label: 'Report send to customer'
},
{
id: 2,
name: 'handover',
label: 'Handover (in CRM)'
},
]
And:
todosMoreDetails: [
{
id: 1,
checked: false,
link: {
type: 'url',
content: 'http://something.com'
},
notes: []
},
{
id: 2,
checked: false,
link: {
type: 'url',
content: 'http://something.com'
},
notes: []
}
]
So that the final array of objects will be a combination of the two, based on the object ID, like below:
FinalTodos: [
{
id: 1,
checked: false,
link: {
type: 'url',
content: 'http://something.com'
},
notes: [],
name: 'customerReport',
label: 'Report send to customer'
},
{
id: 2,
checked: false,
link: {
type: 'url',
content: 'http://something.com'
},
notes: [],
name: 'handover',
label: 'Handover (in CRM)'
}
]
I tried with merge mergeAll and mergeWithKey but I am probably missing something

You can achieve this with an intermediate groupBy:
Transform the todosMoreDetails array into an object keyed by todo property ID using groupBy:
var moreDetailsById = R.groupBy(R.prop('id'), todosMoreDetails);
moreDetailsById is an object where the key is id, and the value is an array of todos. If the id is unique, this will be a singleton array:
{
1: [{
id: 1,
checked: false,
link: {
type: 'url',
content: 'http://something.com'
},
notes: []
}]
}
Now transform the todos array by merging each todo to it's details you retrieve from the grouped view:
var finalTodos = R.map(todo => R.merge(todo, moreDetailsById[todo.id][0]), todos);
An alternate more detailed way:
function mergeTodo(todo) {
var details = moreDetailsById[todo.id][0]; // this is not null safe
var finalTodo = R.merge(todo, details);
return finalTodo;
}
var moreDetailsById = R.groupBy(R.prop('id'), todosMoreDetails);
var finalTodos = todos.map(mergeTodo);

I guess merge is only used for arrays. Have a search for object "extend". Maybe storing the todo details not in seperate objects is the better solution.
Using jQuery? https://api.jquery.com/jquery.extend/
Using underscore? http://underscorejs.org/#extend
Native approach? https://gomakethings.com/vanilla-javascript-version-of-jquery-extend/
Using underscore:
var result = [];
var entry = {};
_.each(todos, function(todo) {
_.each(todosMoreDetails, function(detail) {
if (todo.id == detail.id) {
entry = _.extend(todo, detail);
result.push(entry);
}
}
});
return result;

How to do mutation on array in Relay?

I want to use mutation in Relay to change an array (not connection). The array is typed GraphQLList in the GraphQL side. The graphql side worked perfectly, but relay side needs dataID for each item in an array. And when I am inserting new item or modifying existing item in the array, there are no dataID provided? What is the right way to do this? By the way, I am using redux to maintain the list, and submit changes via relay at the end.
The schema:
let widgetType = new GraphQLInputObjectType({
name: 'Widget',
fields: () => ({
label: {
type: GraphQLString
},
type: {
type: GraphQLString
},
list: {
type: new GraphQLList(GraphQLString)
},
description: {
type: GraphQLString
},
required: {
type: GraphQLBoolean
}
})
});
let modifyFormMutation = mutationWithClientMutationId({
name: 'ModifyForm',
inputFields: {
id: {
type: new GraphQLNonNull(GraphQLString)
},
name: {
type: new GraphQLNonNull(GraphQLString)
},
userId: {
type: new GraphQLNonNull(GraphQLString)
},
widgets: {
type: new GraphQLList(widgetType)
}
},
outputFields: {
formEdge: {
type: formConnection.edgeType,
resolve: (obj) => {
return {
node: {
id: obj.id,
name: obj.name,
userId: obj.userId,
widgets: obj.widgets
},
cursor: obj.id
};
}
},
app: {
type: appType,
resolve: () => app
}
},
mutateAndGetPayload: ({
id, name, userId, widgets
}) => {
db.collection('forms').findOneAndUpdate({
_id: new ObjectID(id)
}, {
name, userId, widgets, createAt: Date.now()
});
return {
id, name, userId, widgets
};
}
})
Relay mutation:
export default class ModifyFormMutation extends Mutation {
getMutation () {
return Relay.QL`mutation{modifyForm}`;
}
getFatQuery() {
return Relay.QL`
fragment on ModifyFormPayload {
formEdge
app { forms }
}
`;
}
getCollisionKey() {
return `check_${this.props.app.id}`;
}
getConfigs() {
return [{
type: 'FIELDS_CHANGE',
fieldIDs: {
formEdge: {node: this.props.node},
app: this.props.app.id
}
}];
}
getVariables() {
return {
name: this.props.node.name,
id: this.props.node.id,
userId: this.props.node.userId,
widgets: this.props.node.widgets
};
}
getOptimisticResponse() {
return {
formEdge: {
name: this.props.node.name,
id: this.props.node.id,
userId: this.props.node.userId,
widgets: this.props.node.widgets
}
};
}
}
And error message from browser:
"Variable "$input_0" got invalid value
{"name":"asdfasdfsa","id":"57e790cec252f32aa805e38d","userId":"57e10a02da7e1116c0906e40","widgets":[{"dataID":"client:618507132","label":"sdfas","type":"text","list":[],"description":"","required":true},{"label":"sfasdfasaaa","list":[],"type":"number","description":"","required":"false"}],"clientMutationId":"0"}.↵In
field "widgets": In element #0: In field "dataID": Unknown field."