This passes
test('test_test', async () => {
try {
const received = true;
const expected = false;
expect(received).toBe(expected);
} catch (err) {
return err
}
});
This fails as it should
test('test_test', () => {
try {
const received = true;
const expected = false;
expect(received).toBe(expected);
} catch (err) {
return err
}
});
I have a function using async and await and this is the reason the test will not fail so I'm trying to understand how to make the top fail as it should.
As #jonrsharpe suggested to remove try/catch it behaves as expected now and fails.
Related
I am currently figuring out how to throw an Exception out of a then catch block. I want to get into the catch that is inside the errorHandler() function.
const errorHandler = function () {
try {
thisFunctionReturnsAnError().then(response => {
console.log(response);
});
} catch (e) {
console.log(e); //How to trigger this?
}
};
const thisFunctionReturnsAnError = function () {
return3()
.then(value => {
throw new Error('This is the error message.');
})
.catch(err => {
//return Promise.reject('this will get rejected');
throw err;
//this one should somehow got to the catch that is located in the errorHandler() function. How to do this?
//I know that this 'err' will be in the next catch block that is written here. This is not what i want.
});
};
const return3 = async function () {
return 3;
};
errorHandler();
I searched a while on stackoverflow but nothing helped me. I am sure that this question got asked often but I could not find the answer, sorry for that.
EDIT:
added here another version of the code but it still does not work
const errorHandler = async function () {
try {
thisFunctionReturnsAnError()
.then(response => console.log(response))
.catch(err => console.log(err));
} catch (e) {
//console.log(e); //How to trigger this?
}
};
const thisFunctionReturnsAnError = function () {
return3()
.then(value => {
throw new Error('This is the error message.');
})
.catch(err => {
return Promise.reject(`Message is: ${err}`);
});
};
const return3 = async function () {
return 3;
};
errorHandler();
I will get the following error message:
Uncaught (in promise) Message is: Error: This is the error message.
Your code can't be executed, because "thisFunctionReturnsAnError" is not returning an Promise. That means that you can't call "then" on the return value.
thisFunctionReturnsAnError().then(response => { // will not work
Why not always use a promise?
const errorHandler = function () {
thisFunctionReturnsAnError()
.then((response) => {
console.log(response);
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log('errorHandler: Handle the error.');
});
};
const thisFunctionReturnsAnError = function () {
return return_Three()
.then((value) => {
throw new Error('This is the error message.');
})
.catch((err) => {
//return Promise.reject('this will get rejected');
throw err;
//this one should somehow got to the catch that is located in the errorHandler() function. How to do this?
//I know that this 'err' will be in the next catch block that is written here. This is not what i want.
});
};
const return_Three = async function () {
return 3;
};
errorHandler();
/*****JUST ANOTHER SYNTAX*******/
const secondErrorHandler = async function () {
try {
await thisFunctionReturnsAnError();
} catch (error) {
console.log('secondErrorHandler: Handle the error.');
}
};
secondErrorHandler();
You cannot handle promise rejections with synchronous try/catch. Don't use it, use the promise .catch() method like in your thisFunctionReturnsAnError function.
You can handle promise rejections with try/catch when using async/await syntax (which you already do, albeit unnecessarily, in return3):
async function errorHandler() { /*
^^^^^ */
try {
const response = await thisFunctionReturnsAnError();
// ^^^^^
console.log(response);
} catch (e) {
console.log(e); // works
}
}
Essentially I have an async function containing a try/catch that calls another async function also containing a try catch, and I'm getting a bit confused about how to properly implement what I'm doing. Some "pseudocode" showing my current implementation:
const main = async () => {
try {
const test = await secondFunc();
console.log(test);
} catch(err) {
console.log('Found an error!');
console.log(err);
}
const secondFunc = async () => {
try {
await performSomeRequestExample();
} catch(err) {
if (err.x === 'x') {
doSomething();
} else {
//********
throw err;
//********
}
}
So what I'm trying to do is get the throw(err) (surrounded by the asterisks) to be caught by the catch in main() which will also call the console.log('Found an error!'), but what currently happens is the error is thrown from secondFunc(), the catch in main() is never hit and I get an unhandled promise rejection.
Any guidance on what I'm doing wrong?
My advice is to minimize using try/catch unless absolutely necessary. With async functions (or any functions that return a Promise object) you can usually simplify things by not worrying about try/catch blocks unless you need to do something specific with certain errors. You can also use .catch rather than try/catch blocks to make things easier to read.
For example your code above could be written like this:
const main = async () => {
const test = await secondFunc().catch(err => {
console.log("Found an error from secondFunc!", err);
throw err; // if you want to send it along to main's caller
});
if (test) {
console.log("Test", test);
}
};
const secondFunc = () => {
return performSomeRequestExample().catch(err => {
if (err.x === "x") {
doSomething();
} else {
throw err;
}
});
};
const performSomeRequestExample = () => Promise.reject("bad");
main().then(
() => console.log("worked"),
err => console.log("failed from main", err)
);
In secondFunc we don't need to use async since we can just return the promise coming back from performSomeRequestExample and handle any failures in the .catch.
You should use
const secondFunc = async () => {
performSomeRequestExample().then(res =>{
console.log(res);
})
.catch(err => {
console.log(err);
}
)
Add a return before the await of performSomeRequestExample.
const secondFunc = async () => {
try {
return await performSomeRequestExample();
} catch (err) {
if (err.x === 'x') {
console.log('x');
} else {
throw err;
}
}
}
or you can also use .catch() after the awaited function.
Another solution can be like this
const main = async() => {
try {
const test = await secondFunc();
console.log(test);
} catch(err) {
console.log('Found an error!');
console.log(err);
}
}
const secondFunc = async () => {
//return await performSomeRequestExample(); //for success
return await performSomeRequestExample(2); //for error
}
const performSomeRequestExample = async(abc=1) => {
return new Promise(function(resolve,reject){
if(abc ==1){
setInterval(resolve("yes"),400);
}else{
setInterval(reject("opps"),400);
}
});
}
main();
Test this code at this link:
https://repl.it/repls/JoyfulSomberTelevision
mongodb 3.6.3
node 8.10.0
I discovered this accidentally and after some time researching problem still can't figure it out. My code has global error handler that should catch all errors, but error that originated from find().map callback was skipped by it and process was exited with standard error log to console.
Here is test code that i come up with
(async () => {
const {MongoClient} = require('mongodb');
const uri = 'your uri';
const connection = MongoClient.connect(uri, {useNewUrlParser: true});
connection.catch((e) => {
console.log('inside connection.catch');
console.log(e);
});
const collection = (await connection).db().collection('collection');
const findPromise = collection.find({}).limit(0).skip(0);
const functionWithError = (item) => {
throw new Error('functionWithError');
};
// This fails to catch error and exits process
// try {
// const items = await findPromise.map(functionWithError).toArray().catch((e) => console.log('Promise catch 1'));
// console.log(items);
// } catch (e) {
// console.log('map error 1');
// console.log(e);
// }
// This (obviously) works and 'inside map error' is written to console
try {
const items = await findPromise.map(() => {
try {
functionWithError();
} catch (e) {
console.log('inside map error'); // this will be outputted
}
}).toArray().catch((e) => console.log('Promise catch 2'));
console.log(items);
} catch (e) {
console.log('map error 2');
console.log(e);
}
})();
I don't see any problem in code and expect 'Promise catch 1' or 'map error 1' to be logged to console. So whats the problem? Thanks in advance.
Its about the scope of asynchronous function. If you try to use asynchronous function in try..catch block, asynchronous function goes out of scope of try..catch block, so it, it is always good practice to return errors in asynchronous function callback, which can be handled by simple if..else check.
Useful link
Example1: throwing an error in async-await, where no asynchronous process is running.
(async () => {
const someAsync = async () => {
throw new Error('error here');
};
try {
await someAsync();
} catch (e) {
console.log('error cached as expected!');
}
console.log('execution continues');
})();
Example2: throwing an error in async-await, where the asynchronous process is running.
(async () => {
const someAsync = async () => {
let timeInMS = 0; // 0 milliseconds
let timer = setTimeout(function() {
clearTimeout(timer);
throw new Error('error here');
}, timeInMS);
};
try {
await someAsync();
} catch (e) {
console.log('error cached as expected!');
}
console.log('execution continues');
})();
I am creating a endpoint in node.js using ES6 Symbol. Example
// ES6 Symbol Method
const taskCreationMethod = {
[Symbol.taskMethod]() {
return {
storeCheckFunc: async function(storeId, employeeId) {
let store = await resourceModel["stores"].findById(storeId).populate(references["stores"]);
if(!store) {
return new Error("Store not found");
}
let employeeCheck = _.find(store.employees, (empObj) => {
return empObj._id == employeeId
})
if(!employeeCheck) {
return new Error("Employee not found");
}
return employeeCheck;
}
};
}
}
//end point
export const taskCreation = async(req, res) => {
const storeCheck = await taskCreationMethod[Symbol.taskMethod]().storeCheckFunc(req.body.store, req.body.assigned_to);
// here How can I handle return with Error Response?
}
You need to throw that error not just return it if you want to use the mechanisms of error handling. The thrown error will become a rejected promise which you can then handle with .catch() directly on the promise or with try/catch if you are using it in an async function. Here's a simplified example:
function populate() {
// always resolves to undefined
return Promise.resolve(undefined)
}
const taskCreationMethod = {
someMethod() {
return {
storeCheckFunc: async function() {
let store = await populate() // always resolves undefined
if (!store) { // so it always fails
throw new Error("Store not found"); // throw error
}
}
};
}
}
// regular promise then().catch()
taskCreationMethod.someMethod().storeCheckFunc()
.then(res => console.log(res))
.catch(err => console.log("Error:", err.message)) // catch
// OR … async function
async function runit() {
try {
let s = await taskCreationMethod.someMethod().storeCheckFunc()
} catch (err) {
console.log("Error:", err.message)
}
}
runit()
How can i test the catch block on a es6 Class
const fs = require('fs');
class Service {
constructor(accessToken) {
this.accessToken = accessToken;
}
async getData() { // eslint-disable-line class-methods-use-this
try {
const data = fs.readFileSync(`${__dirname}/models/mockData.json`, { encoding: 'utf8' });
const returnData = JSON.parse(data);
return returnData;
} catch (err) {
return err;
}
}
}
module.exports = Service;
using jest how can i write the test case to cover the catch block also.
You can mock the method readFileSync from fs to force it to return undefined. JSON.parse(undefined) will throw an error, thus you can check the catch side of the code.
fs.readFileSync = jest.fn()
fs.readFileSync.mockReturnValue(undefined);
First of all, in the catch side you should throw the error. Just returning it is not a good practise when managing errors, from my point of view. But there is people doing it.
const fs = require('fs');
class Service {
constructor(accessToken) {
this.accessToken = accessToken;
}
async getData() { // eslint-disable-line class-methods-use-this
try {
const data = fs.readFileSync(`${__dirname}/models/mockData.json`, { encoding: 'utf8' });
const returnData = JSON.parse(data);
return returnData;
} catch (err) {
throw err;
}
}
}
Having this code, you can actually test your catch block code in two different ways with Jest:
beforeEach(() => {
fs.readFileSync = jest.fn();
});
afterEach(() => {
fs.readFileSync.mockClear();
});
test('Async expect test', () => {
fs.readFileSync.mockReturnValue(undefined);
const result = service.getData();
expect(result).rejects.toThrow();
});
test('Async / await test', async() => {
fs.readFileSync.mockReturnValue(undefined);
try {
await service.getData();
} catch (err) {
expect(err.name).toEqual('TypeError');
expect(err.message).toEqual(`Cannot read property 'charCodeAt' of undefined`);
}
});
Both of them imply to mock the readFileSync method from fs module as I suggested before. You can even mock the whole fs module with Jest. Or you could just mock the JSON.parse. There are plenty of options to be able to test the catch block.
Jest has its own method for testing exception, you can use toThrow. It looks something like this
test('throws on octopus', () => {
expect(() => {
drinkFlavor('octopus');
}).toThrow(); // Test the exception here
});
Note
Since your function is asynchronous, try to explicitly define your error, then use await to resolve/reject it, After that you can check for the actual rejection
test('throws on octopus', () => {
await expect(user.getUserName(3)).rejects.toEqual({
error: 'User with 3 not found.',
});
});