When running npx babel index.js from the command line, I was hoping I would see my babel configurations being applied from babel.config.js
However it does not seem the case as was wondering why this might be?
// babel.config.js
module.exports = function babel(api) {
api.cache(true);
return {
presets: ['module:metro-react-native-babel-preset'],
plugins: [
[
'babel-plugin-root-import',
{
rootPathSuffix: './src',
rootPathPrefix: '~/',
},
],
],
};
};
// index.js
import { AppRegistry } from 'react-native';
import App from '~/App';
AppRegistry.registerComponent("App Name", () => App)
// Expected output from npx babel index.js
import { AppRegistry } from 'react-native';
import App from './src/App'; // Note the change from '~' to './src' using babel-plugin-root-import
AppRegistry.registerComponent("App Name", () => App)
I noticed in the npx babel --help it stated that --no-babelrc flag ignores configuration from .babelrc and .babelignore files. Does this suggest that babel.config.js files aren't considered when calling this command?
Cheers
babel.config.js config change is introduced in babel 7; so if you are using babel 6.*, it doesn't understand project wide configuration yet; either use .babelrc or upgrade to babel 7 to be able to use new features; I'd did the upgrade its pretty smooth and painless, just make sure you have clean git directory ( in case of emergency :) and do it.
Related
Project setup:
Vuejs 3
Webpack 4
Babel
TS
We created the project using vue-cli and add the dependency to the library.
We then imported a project (Vue Currency Input v2.0.0) that uses optional chaining. But we get the following error while executing the serve script:
error in ./node_modules/vue-currency-input/dist/index.esm.js
Module parse failed: Unexpected token (265:36)
You may need an appropriate loader to handle this file type, currently no loaders are configured to process this file. See https://webpack.js.org/concepts#loaders
| getMinValue() {
| let min = this.toFloat(-Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER);
> if (this.options.valueRange?.min !== undefined) {
| min = Math.max(this.options.valueRange?.min, this.toFloat(-Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER));
| }
I read that Webpack 4 doesn't support optional chaining by default. So, we added the Babel plugin for optional chaining. This is our babel.config.js file:
module.exports = {
presets: ["#vue/cli-plugin-babel/preset"],
plugins: ["#babel/plugin-proposal-optional-chaining"],
};
(But, if I am correct, this plugin is now enable by default in the babel-preset. So this modification might be useless ^^)
One thing that I don't understand is that we can use optional chaining in the .vue files.
I created a SandBox with all the files: SandBox
How could I solve this error?
I was able to overcome this issue using #babel/plugin-proposal-optional-chaining, but for me the only way I could get Webpack to use the Babel plugin was to shove the babel-loader configuration through the Webpack options in vue.config.js. Here is a minimal vue.config.js:
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
chainWebpack: config => {
config.module
.rule('supportChaining')
.test(/\.js$/)
.include
.add(path.resolve('node_modules/PROBLEM_MODULE'))
.end()
.use('babel-loader')
.loader('babel-loader')
.tap(options => ({ ...options,
plugins : ['#babel/plugin-proposal-optional-chaining']
}))
.end()
}
};
NB replace "PROBLEM_MODULE" in the above with the module where you have the problem.
Surprisingly I did not need to install #babel/plugin-proposal-optional-chaining with NPM. I did a go/no-go test with an app scaffolded with #vue/cli 4.5.13, in my case without typescript. I imported the NPM module that has been causing my grief (#vime/vue-next 5.0.31 BTW), ran the serve script and got the Unexpected token error on a line containing optional chaining. I then plunked the above vue.config.js into the project root and ran the serve script again, this time with no errors.
My point is it appears this problem can be addressed without polluting one's development environment very much.
The Vue forums are in denial about this problem, claiming Vue 3 supports optional chaining. Apparently not, however, in node modules. A post in this thread by atflick on 2/26/2021 was a big help.
Had same issue with Vue 2 without typescript.
To fix this you need to force babel preset to include optional chaining rule:
presets: [
[
'#vue/cli-plugin-babel/preset',
{
include: ['#babel/plugin-proposal-optional-chaining'],
},
],
],
Can also be achieved by setting old browser target in browserslist config.
Most importantly, you need to add your failing module to transpileDependencies in vue.config.js:
module.exports = {
...
transpileDependencies: ['vue-currency-input],
}
This is required, because babel by default will exclude all node_modules from transpilation (mentioned in vue cli docs), thus no configured plugins will be applied.
I had a similar problem. I'm using nuxt but my .babelrc file looks like the below, and got it working for me.
{
"presets": [
["#babel/preset-env"]
],
"plugins":[
["#babel/plugin-transform-runtime",
{
"regenerator": true
}
]
],
"env": {
"test": {
"plugins": [
["transform-regenerator", {
"regenerator": true
}],
"#babel/plugin-transform-runtime"
],
"presets": [
["#babel/preset-env", {
"useBuiltIns": false
}]
]
}
}
}
I managed to fix the solution by adding these lines to package.json:
...
"scripts": {
"preinstall": "npx npm-force-resolutions",
...
},
"resolutions": {
"acorn": "8.0.1"
},
...
I have project which uses lerna ( monorepo, multiple packages ). Few of the packages are standalone apps.
What I want to achieve is having aliases on few of the packages to have something like dependency injection. So for example I have alias #package1/backendProvider/useCheckout and in webpack in my standalone app I resolve it as ../../API/REST/useCheckout . So when I change backend provider to something else I would only change it in webpack.
Problem
Problem appears when this alias is used by some other package ( not standalone app ). For example:
Directory structure looks like this:
Project
packageA
ComponentA
packageB
API
REST
useCheckout
standalone app
ComponentA is in packageA
useCheckout is in packageB under /API/REST/useCheckout path
ComponentA uses useCheckout with alias like import useCheckout from '#packageA/backendProvider/useCheckout
Standalone app uses componentA
The error I get is that Module not found: Can't resolve '#packageA/backendProvider/useCheckout
However when same alias is used in standalone app ( that has webpack with config provided below ) it is working. Problem occurs only for dependencies.
Potential solutions
I know that one solution would be to compile each package with webpack - but that doesn't really seem friendly. What I think is doable is to tell webpack to resolve those aliases to directory paths and then to recompile it. First part ( resolving aliases ) is done.
Current code
As I'm using NextJS my webpack config looks like this:
webpack: (config, { buildId, dev, isServer, defaultLoaders }) => {
// Fixes npm packages that depend on `fs` module
config.node = {
fs: "empty"
};
const aliases = {
...
"#package1/backendProvider": "../../API/REST/"
};
Object.keys(aliases).forEach(alias => {
config.module.rules.push({
test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
include: [path.resolve(__dirname, aliases[alias])],
use: [defaultLoaders.babel]
});
config.resolve.alias[alias] = path.resolve(__dirname, aliases[alias]);
});
return config;
}
You don’t need to use aliases. I have a similar setup, just switch to yarn (v1) workspaces which does a pretty smart trick, it adds sym link to all of your packages in the root node_modules.
This way, each package can import other packages without any issue.
In order to apply yarn workspaces with lerna:
// lerna.json
{
"npmClient": "yarn",
"useWorkspaces": true,
"packages": [
"packages/**"
],
}
// package.json
{
...
"private": true,
"workspaces": [
"packages/*",
]
...
}
This will enable yarn workspace with lerna.
The only think that remains to solve is to make consumer package to transpile the required package (since default configs of babel & webpack is to ignore node_module transpilation).
In Next.js project it is easy, use next-transpile-modules.
// next.config.js
const withTM = require('next-transpile-modules')(['somemodule', 'and-another']); // pass the modules you would like to see transpiled
module.exports = withTM();
In other packages that are using webpack you will need to instruct webpack to transpile your consumed packages (lets assume that they are under npm scope of #somescope/).
So for example, in order to transpile typescript, you can add additional module loader.
// webpack.config.js
{
...
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.ts$/,
loader: 'ts-loader',
include: /[\\/]node_modules[\\/]#somescope[\\/]/, // <-- instruct to transpile ts files from this path
options: {
allowTsInNodeModules: true, // <- this a specific option of ts-loader
transpileOnly: isDevelopment,
compilerOptions: {
module: 'commonjs',
noEmit: false,
},
},
}
]
}
...
resolve: {
symlinks: false, // <-- important
}
}
If you have css, you will need add a section for css as well.
Hope this helps.
Bonus advantage, yarn workspaces will reduce your node_modules size since it will install duplicate packages (with the same semver version) once!
In my React-Native application, import paths are like this.
import {
ScreenContainer,
SLButton,
SLTextInput,
} from '../../../../../components';
import { KeyBoardTypes } from '../../../../../enums';
import { SIGN_UP_FORM } from '../../../../constants/forms';
I have seen some applications, there the paths are more clear and elegant without '../../../'s. How can I achieve this in React-Native??
I saw in my solution that, in every folder there was a package.json file. I'm not sure if that is the proper way to do it.
You need to configure alias in webpack.config.js. You can find an example here and here
webpack.config.js:
alias: {
'#': path.join(__dirname, 'src')
}
your.js.file.js
import '#/utils/classComponentHooks';
if you don't use wepback for react-native (despite you can). You can also try .babelrc
[
'module-resolver',
{
root: ['./src'],
alias: {
'#': './src',
},
},
];
Starting around React Native version 0.55 (I'm not sure exactly when this was enabled) you can just use your project name as the path root.
import {DatePanel} from 'MyProject/components/panels';
import HomeScreen from 'MyProject/screens/HomeScreen';
No problems with flow, Xcode, etc.
It's possible. I've done it, but I don't recommend it. It doesn't work when xcode starts bundler because you have to do npm start -- --reset-cache. You have to use workarounds to learn your IDE understand this paths. It doesn't work with Flow.
You can use npm babel-plugin-module-resolver. Babel is used by metro budler.
.babelrc.
{
"presets": ["react-native"],
"plugins": [
[
"module-resolver",
{
"root": ["./src"],
"alias": {
"src": "./src",
"root": "./"
}
}
]
],
}
I have a react component in the path
src/components/test
import React from 'react';
import ReactDom from 'react-dom';
class TestComp extends React.Component {}
export default TestComp;
I am exposing the component in index.js from path
src/index.js
import TestComp from './components/test';
export {
TestComp
};
I have added main in package.json as "main": "src/index.js"
I have published a npm package test-comp of above application and using same in another application.
main.js
import {TestComp} from 'test-comp';
I am using grunt-browserify in this application with following options set.
options: {
"transform": [
[
"babelify",
{
"presets": [
"es2015",
"react",
"stage-0"
]
}
]
],
browserifyOptions: {
debug: true,
extensions: ['.js', '.jsx'],
entries: ['main.js']
}
}
When I run grunt browserify getting following error.
>> import TestComp from './components/test';
>> ^
>> ParseError: 'import' and 'export' may appear only with 'sourceType: module'
Warning: Error running grunt-browserify. Use --force to continue.
It probably not understanding the path mentioned in node module or rejecting to understand the same which linting. I even have tried adding following in .eslintrc but no luck
{
"extends": "eslint:recommended",
"parserOptions": {
"ecmaVersion": 6,
"sourceType": "module"
},
"env": {
"browser": true,
"es6": true
},
"ecmaFeatures": {
"modules": true
}
}
I tried most of SO answers related to this error. But still stuck in same place.
EDIT
I am able to browserify first module directly with almost similar configuration. Getting this error when first module is loaded as node dependancy in other application as explained above.
So you wrote the module test-comp in ES6, using import and export, and the main entry of the package.json in test-comp refers to src/index.js.
The answer is that browserify transforms don't apply to every module you require. They only apply to the immediate project: not the project's dependencies.
If you want to require a module that uses ES6 syntax in browserify, you'll either need to
Add a prepublish script to test-comp that transpiles it to ES5, and change the main entry of test-comp to refer to that ES5 version, not the ES6 version
Add babelify as a dependency of test-comp and add babelify as a browserify transform in the package's 'browserify' entry, as documented in babelify.
I am trying to incorporate rollup.js into a project. Currently I am getting the warnings provided below in the console (unresolved dependencies) and I am not sure why or how to fix it:
'fs' is imported by node_modules\filereader\FileReader.js, but could not be resolved – treating it as an external dependency
'fs' is imported by commonjs-external:fs, but could not be resolved – treating it as an external dependency
preferring built-in module 'punycode' over local alternative at 'C:\Users\Ryan\OneDrive\Projects\Custom Coding\Zapier\Ryan Test\node_modules\punycode\punycode.js', pass 'preferBuiltins: false' to disable this behavior or 'preferBuiltins: true' to disable this warning
preferring built-in module 'punycode' over local alternative at 'C:\Users\Ryan\OneDrive\Projects\Custom Coding\Zapier\Ryan Test\node_modules\punycode\punycode.js', pass 'preferBuiltins: false' to disable this behavior or 'preferBuiltins: true' to disable this warning
Here is the test.js script requiring FileReader and https:
var FileReader = require('filereader');
var https = require('https');
Finally the rollup.config.js file which executes creating the bundle:
var rollup = require('rollup');
var commonjs = require('rollup-plugin-commonjs');
var nodeResolve = require('rollup-plugin-node-resolve');
var globals = require('rollup-plugin-node-globals');
var builtins = require('rollup-plugin-node-builtins');
// build bundle
rollup
.rollup({
entry: 'test.js',
plugins: [
nodeResolve(),
commonjs(),
globals(),
builtins()
]
})
.then(bundle => bundle.write({
dest: 'rollupBundle/bundle.js',
format: 'cjs'
}))
.catch(err => console.log(err.stack));
The CLI will generate more informative warnings — if you update your config file to use the standard form, then you can use rollup -c instead and it will often give you a URL to help diagnose issues.
Here's a config file with the necessary changes to squelch those warnings:
import commonjs from 'rollup-plugin-commonjs';
import nodeResolve from 'rollup-plugin-node-resolve';
import globals from 'rollup-plugin-node-globals';
import builtins from 'rollup-plugin-node-builtins';
export default {
entry: 'test.js',
dest: 'rollupBundle/bundle.js',
format: 'cjs',
external: [ 'fs' ], // tells Rollup 'I know what I'm doing here'
plugins: [
nodeResolve({ preferBuiltins: false }), // or `true`
commonjs(),
globals(),
builtins()
]
};
UPDATE: The "official" Rollup plugins are now under the #rollup namespace on npm, if you install the two versions mentioned above you will get an "npm WARN deprecated" message, so instead install the newer versions instead:
npm install #rollup/plugin-commonjs --save-dev
npm install #rollup/plugin-node-resolve --save-dev
then use them like this:
import commonjs from '#rollup/plugin-commonjs';
import { nodeResolve } from '#rollup/plugin-node-resolve';