Related
I'm trying my hardest to wrap my head around JavaScript closures.
I get that by returning an inner function, it will have access to any variable defined in its immediate parent.
Where would this be useful to me? Perhaps I haven't quite got my head around it yet. Most of the examples I have seen online don't provide any real world code, just vague examples.
Can someone show me a real world use of a closure?
Is this one, for example?
var warnUser = function (msg) {
var calledCount = 0;
return function() {
calledCount++;
alert(msg + '\nYou have been warned ' + calledCount + ' times.');
};
};
var warnForTamper = warnUser('You can not tamper with our HTML.');
warnForTamper();
warnForTamper();
Suppose, you want to count the number of times user clicked a button on a webpage.
For this, you are triggering a function on onclick event of button to update the count of the variable
<button onclick="updateClickCount()">click me</button>
Now there could be many approaches like:
You could use a global variable, and a function to increase the counter:
var counter = 0;
function updateClickCount() {
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
But, the pitfall is that any script on the page can change the counter, without calling updateClickCount().
Now, you might be thinking of declaring the variable inside the function:
function updateClickCount() {
var counter = 0;
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
But, hey! Every time updateClickCount() function is called, the counter is set to 1 again.
Thinking about nested functions?
Nested functions have access to the scope "above" them.
In this example, the inner function updateClickCount() has access to the counter variable in the parent function countWrapper():
function countWrapper() {
var counter = 0;
function updateClickCount() {
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
updateClickCount();
return counter;
}
This could have solved the counter dilemma, if you could reach the updateClickCount() function from the outside and you also need to find a way to execute counter = 0 only once not everytime.
Closure to the rescue! (self-invoking function):
var updateClickCount = (function(){
var counter = 0;
return function(){
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
})();
The self-invoking function only runs once. It sets the counter to zero (0), and returns a function expression.
This way updateClickCount becomes a function. The "wonderful" part is that it can access the counter in the parent scope.
This is called a JavaScript closure. It makes it possible for a function to have "private" variables.
The counter is protected by the scope of the anonymous function, and can only be changed using the updateClickCount() function!
A more lively example on closures
<script>
var updateClickCount = (function(){
var counter = 0;
return function(){
++counter;
document.getElementById("spnCount").innerHTML = counter;
}
})();
</script>
<html>
<button onclick="updateClickCount()">click me</button>
<div> you've clicked
<span id="spnCount"> 0 </span> times!
</div>
</html>
Reference: JavaScript Closures
I've used closures to do things like:
a = (function () {
var privatefunction = function () {
alert('hello');
}
return {
publicfunction : function () {
privatefunction();
}
}
})();
As you can see there, a is now an object, with a method publicfunction ( a.publicfunction() ) which calls privatefunction, which only exists inside the closure. You can not call privatefunction directly (i.e. a.privatefunction() ), just publicfunction().
It's a minimal example, but maybe you can see uses to it? We used this to enforce public/private methods.
The example you give is an excellent one. Closures are an abstraction mechanism that allow you to separate concerns very cleanly. Your example is a case of separating instrumentation (counting calls) from semantics (an error-reporting API). Other uses include:
Passing parameterised behaviour into an algorithm (classic higher-order programming):
function proximity_sort(arr, midpoint) {
arr.sort(function(a, b) { a -= midpoint; b -= midpoint; return a*a - b*b; });
}
Simulating object oriented programming:
function counter() {
var a = 0;
return {
inc: function() { ++a; },
dec: function() { --a; },
get: function() { return a; },
reset: function() { a = 0; }
}
}
Implementing exotic flow control, such as jQuery's Event handling and AJAX APIs.
JavaScript closures can be used to implement throttle and debounce functionality in your application.
Throttling
Throttling puts a limit on as a maximum number of times a function can be called over time. As in "execute this function at most once every 100 milliseconds."
Code:
const throttle = (func, limit) => {
let isThrottling
return function() {
const args = arguments
const context = this
if (!isThrottling) {
func.apply(context, args)
isThrottling = true
setTimeout(() => isThrottling = false, limit)
}
}
}
Debouncing
Debouncing puts a limit on a function not be called again until a certain amount of time has passed without it being called. As in "execute this function only if 100 milliseconds have passed without it being called."
Code:
const debounce = (func, delay) => {
let debouncing
return function() {
const context = this
const args = arguments
clearTimeout(debouncing)
debouncing = setTimeout(() => func.apply(context, args), delay)
}
}
As you can see closures helped in implementing two beautiful features which every web application should have to provide smooth UI experience functionality.
Yes, that is a good example of a useful closure. The call to warnUser creates the calledCount variable in its scope and returns an anonymous function which is stored in the warnForTamper variable. Because there is still a closure making use of the calledCount variable, it isn't deleted upon the function's exit, so each call to the warnForTamper() will increase the scoped variable and alert the value.
The most common issue I see on Stack Overflow is where someone wants to "delay" use of a variable that is increased upon each loop, but because the variable is scoped then each reference to the variable would be after the loop has ended, resulting in the end state of the variable:
for (var i = 0; i < someVar.length; i++)
window.setTimeout(function () {
alert("Value of i was "+i+" when this timer was set" )
}, 10000);
This would result in every alert showing the same value of i, the value it was increased to when the loop ended. The solution is to create a new closure, a separate scope for the variable. This can be done using an instantly executed anonymous function, which receives the variable and stores its state as an argument:
for (var i = 0; i < someVar.length; i++)
(function (i) {
window.setTimeout(function () {
alert("Value of i was " + i + " when this timer was set")
}, 10000);
})(i);
In the JavaScript (or any ECMAScript) language, in particular, closures are useful in hiding the implementation of functionality while still revealing the interface.
For example, imagine you are writing a class of date utility methods and you want to allow users to look up weekday names by index, but you don't want them to be able to modify the array of names you use under the hood.
var dateUtil = {
weekdayShort: (function() {
var days = ['Mon', 'Tue', 'Wed', 'Thu', 'Fri', 'Sat', 'Sun'];
return function(x) {
if ((x != parseInt(x)) || (x < 1) || (x > 7)) {
throw new Error("invalid weekday number");
}
return days[x - 1];
};
}())
};
Note that the days array could simply be stored as a property of the dateUtil object, but then it would be visible to users of the script and they could even change it if they wanted, without even needing your source code. However, since it's enclosed by the anonymous function which returns the date lookup function it is only accessible by the lookup function so it is now tamperproof.
There is a section on Practical Closures at the Mozilla Developer Network.
If you're comfortable with the concept of instantiating a class in the object-oriented sense (i.e. to create an object of that class) then you're close to understanding closures.
Think of it this way: when you instantiate two Person objects you know that the class member variable "Name" is not shared between instances; each object has its own 'copy'. Similarly, when you create a closure, the free variable ('calledCount' in your example above) is bound to the 'instance' of the function.
I think your conceptual leap is slightly hampered by the fact that every function/closure returned by the warnUser function (aside: that's a higher-order function) closure binds 'calledCount' with the same initial value (0), whereas often when creating closures it is more useful to pass different initializers into the higher-order function, much like passing different values to the constructor of a class.
So, suppose when 'calledCount' reaches a certain value you want to end the user's session; you might want different values for that depending on whether the request comes in from the local network or the big bad internet (yes, it's a contrived example). To achieve this, you could pass different initial values for calledCount into warnUser (i.e. -3, or 0?).
Part of the problem with the literature is the nomenclature used to describe them ("lexical scope", "free variables"). Don't let it fool you, closures are more simple than would appear... prima facie ;-)
Here, I have a greeting that I want to say several times. If I create a closure, I can simply call that function to record the greeting. If I don't create the closure, I have to pass my name in every single time.
Without a closure (https://jsfiddle.net/lukeschlangen/pw61qrow/3/):
function greeting(firstName, lastName) {
var message = "Hello " + firstName + " " + lastName + "!";
console.log(message);
}
greeting("Billy", "Bob");
greeting("Billy", "Bob");
greeting("Billy", "Bob");
greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
With a closure (https://jsfiddle.net/lukeschlangen/Lb5cfve9/3/):
function greeting(firstName, lastName) {
var message = "Hello " + firstName + " " + lastName + "!";
return function() {
console.log(message);
}
}
var greetingBilly = greeting("Billy", "Bob");
var greetingLuke = greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
greetingBilly();
greetingBilly();
greetingBilly();
greetingLuke();
greetingLuke();
greetingLuke();
Another common use for closures is to bind this in a method to a specific object, allowing it to be called elsewhere (such as as an event handler).
function bind(obj, method) {
if (typeof method == 'string') {
method = obj[method];
}
return function () {
method.apply(obj, arguments);
}
}
...
document.body.addEventListener('mousemove', bind(watcher, 'follow'), true);
Whenever a mousemove event fires, watcher.follow(evt) is called.
Closures are also an essential part of higher-order functions, allowing the very common pattern of rewriting multiple similar functions as a single higher order function by parameterizing the dissimilar portions. As an abstract example,
foo_a = function (...) {A a B}
foo_b = function (...) {A b B}
foo_c = function (...) {A c B}
becomes
fooer = function (x) {
return function (...) {A x B}
}
where A and B aren't syntactical units but source code strings (not string literals).
See "Streamlining my javascript with a function" for a concrete example.
Here I have one simple example of the closure concept which we can use for in our E-commerce site or many others as well.
I am adding my JSFiddle link with the example. It contains a small product list of three items and one cart counter.
JSFiddle
// Counter closure implemented function;
var CartCouter = function(){
var counter = 0;
function changeCounter(val){
counter += val
}
return {
increment: function(){
changeCounter(1);
},
decrement: function(){
changeCounter(-1);
},
value: function(){
return counter;
}
}
}
var cartCount = CartCouter();
function updateCart() {
document.getElementById('cartcount').innerHTML = cartCount.value();
}
var productlist = document.getElementsByClassName('item');
for(var i = 0; i< productlist.length; i++){
productlist[i].addEventListener('click', function(){
if(this.className.indexOf('selected') < 0){
this.className += " selected";
cartCount.increment();
updateCart();
}
else{
this.className = this.className.replace("selected", "");
cartCount.decrement();
updateCart();
}
})
}
.productslist{
padding: 10px;
}
ul li{
display: inline-block;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid #DDD;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;
cursor: pointer;
}
.selected{
background-color: #7CFEF0;
color: #333;
}
.cartdiv{
position: relative;
float: right;
padding: 5px;
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 1px solid #F1F1F1;
}
<div>
<h3>
Practical use of a JavaScript closure concept/private variable.
</h3>
<div class="cartdiv">
<span id="cartcount">0</span>
</div>
<div class="productslist">
<ul>
<li class="item">Product 1</li>
<li class="item">Product 2</li>
<li class="item">Product 3</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
Use of Closures:
Closures are one of the most powerful features of JavaScript. JavaScript allows for the nesting of functions and grants the inner function full access to all the variables and functions defined inside the outer function (and all other variables and functions that the outer function has access to). However, the outer function does not have access to the variables and functions defined inside the inner function.
This provides a sort of security for the variables of the inner function. Also, since the inner function has access to the scope of the outer function, the variables and functions defined in the outer function will live longer than the outer function itself, if the inner function manages to survive beyond the life of the outer function. A closure is created when the inner function is somehow made available to any scope outside the outer function.
Example:
<script>
var createPet = function(name) {
var sex;
return {
setName: function(newName) {
name = newName;
},
getName: function() {
return name;
},
getSex: function() {
return sex;
},
setSex: function(newSex) {
if(typeof newSex == "string" && (newSex.toLowerCase() == "male" || newSex.toLowerCase() == "female")) {
sex = newSex;
}
}
}
}
var pet = createPet("Vivie");
console.log(pet.getName()); // Vivie
console.log(pet.setName("Oliver"));
console.log(pet.setSex("male"));
console.log(pet.getSex()); // male
console.log(pet.getName()); // Oliver
</script>
In the code above, the name variable of the outer function is accessible to the inner functions, and there is no other way to access the inner variables except through the inner functions. The inner variables of the inner function act as safe stores for the inner functions. They hold "persistent", yet secure, data for the inner functions to work with. The functions do not even have to be assigned to a variable, or have a name.
read here for detail.
Explaining the practical use for a closure in JavaScript
When we create a function inside another function, we are creating a closure. Closures are powerful because they are capable of reading and manipulating the data of its outer functions. Whenever a function is invoked, a new scope is created for that call. The local variable declared inside the function belong to that scope and they can only be accessed from that function. When the function has finished the execution, the scope is usually destroyed.
A simple example of such function is this:
function buildName(name) {
const greeting = "Hello, " + name;
return greeting;
}
In above example, the function buildName() declares a local variable greeting and returns it. Every function call creates a new scope with a new local variable. After the function is done executing, we have no way to refer to that scope again, so it’s garbage collected.
But how about when we have a link to that scope?
Let’s look at the next function:
function buildName(name) {
const greeting = "Hello, " + name + " Welcome ";
const sayName = function() {
console.log(greeting);
};
return sayName;
}
const sayMyName = buildName("Mandeep");
sayMyName(); // Hello, Mandeep Welcome
The function sayName() from this example is a closure. The sayName() function has its own local scope (with variable welcome) and has also access to the outer (enclosing) function’s scope. In this case, the variable greeting from buildName().
After the execution of buildName is done, the scope is not destroyed in this case. The sayMyName() function still has access to it, so it won’t be garbage collected. However, there is no other way of accessing data from the outer scope except the closure. The closure serves as the gateway between the global context and the outer scope.
The JavaScript module pattern uses closures. Its nice pattern allows you to have something alike "public" and "private" variables.
var myNamespace = (function () {
var myPrivateVar, myPrivateMethod;
// A private counter variable
myPrivateVar = 0;
// A private function which logs any arguments
myPrivateMethod = function(foo) {
console.log(foo);
};
return {
// A public variable
myPublicVar: "foo",
// A public function utilizing privates
myPublicFunction: function(bar) {
// Increment our private counter
myPrivateVar++;
// Call our private method using bar
myPrivateMethod(bar);
}
};
})();
I like Mozilla's function factory example.
function makeAdder(x) {
return function(y) {
return x + y;
};
}
var addFive = makeAdder(5);
console.assert(addFive(2) === 7);
console.assert(addFive(-5) === 0);
This thread has helped me immensely in gaining a better understanding of how closures work.
I've since done some experimentation of my own and came up with this fairly simple code which may help some other people see how closures can be used in a practical way and how to use the closure at different levels to maintain variables similar to static and/or global variables without risk of them getting overwritten or confused with global variables.
This keeps track of button clicks, both at a local level for each individual button and a global level, counting every button click, contributing towards a single figure. Note I haven't used any global variables to do this, which is kind of the point of the exercise - having a handler that can be applied to any button that also contributes to something globally.
Please experts, do let me know if I've committed any bad practices here! I'm still learning this stuff myself.
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Closures on button presses</title>
<script type="text/javascript">
window.addEventListener("load" , function () {
/*
Grab the function from the first closure,
and assign to a temporary variable
this will set the totalButtonCount variable
that is used to count the total of all button clicks
*/
var buttonHandler = buttonsCount();
/*
Using the result from the first closure (a function is returned)
assign and run the sub closure that carries the
individual variable for button count and assign to the click handlers
*/
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click" , buttonHandler() );
document.getElementById("button2").addEventListener("click" , buttonHandler() );
document.getElementById("button3").addEventListener("click" , buttonHandler() );
// Now that buttonHandler has served its purpose it can be deleted if needs be
buttonHandler = null;
});
function buttonsCount() {
/*
First closure level
- totalButtonCount acts as a sort of global counter to count any button presses
*/
var totalButtonCount = 0;
return function () {
// Second closure level
var myButtonCount = 0;
return function (event) {
// Actual function that is called on the button click
event.preventDefault();
/*
Increment the button counts.
myButtonCount only exists in the scope that is
applied to each event handler and therefore acts
to count each button individually, whereas because
of the first closure totalButtonCount exists at
the scope just outside, it maintains a sort
of static or global variable state
*/
totalButtonCount++;
myButtonCount++;
/*
Do something with the values ... fairly pointless
but it shows that each button contributes to both
its own variable and the outer variable in the
first closure
*/
console.log("Total button clicks: "+totalButtonCount);
console.log("This button count: "+myButtonCount);
}
}
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
Button 1
Button 2
Button 3
</body>
</html>
There are various use cases of closures.Here, I am going to explain most important usage of Closure concept.
Closure can be used to create private methods and variables just like an object-oriented language like java, c++ and so on. Once you implemented private methods and variables, your variables defined inside a function won't be accessible by window object. This helps in data hiding and data security.
const privateClass = () => {
let name = "sundar";
function setName(changeName) {
name = changeName;
}
function getName() {
return name;
}
return {
setName: setName,
getName: getName,
};
};
let javaLikeObject = privateClass(); \\ similar to new Class() in OOPS.
console.log(javaLikeObject.getName()); \\this will give sundar
javaLikeObject.setName("suresh");
console.log(javaLikeObject.getName()); \\this will give suresh
Another real-life example of closure :
Create index.html:
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<title>Program with Javascript</title>
</head>
<body>
<p id="first"></p>
<p id="second"></p>
<button onclick="applyingConcepts()">Click</button>
<script src="./index.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
2)In index.js:
let count = 0;
return () => {
document.getElementById("first").innerHTML = count++;
};
})();
In this example, when you click a button, then your count will be updated on p#id.
Note: You might be wondering what's special in this code. When you inspect, you will notice that you can't change the value of count using the window object. This means you have declared private variable count so this prevents your states from being spoiled by the client.
I wrote an article a while back about how closures can be used to simplify event-handling code. It compares ASP.NET event handling to client-side jQuery.
http://www.hackification.com/2009/02/20/closures-simplify-event-handling-code/
Much of the code we write in front-end JavaScript is event-based — we define some behavior, then attach it to an event that is triggered by the user (such as a click or a keypress). Our code is generally attached as a callback: a single function which is executed in response to the event.
size12, size14, and size16 are now functions which will resize the body text to 12, 14, and 16 pixels, respectively. We can attach them to buttons (in this case links) as follows:
function makeSizer(size) {
return function() {
document.body.style.fontSize = size + 'px';
};
}
var size12 = makeSizer(12);
var size14 = makeSizer(14);
var size16 = makeSizer(16);
document.getElementById('size-12').onclick = size12;
document.getElementById('size-14').onclick = size14;
document.getElementById('size-16').onclick = size16;
Fiddle
Closures are a useful way to create generators, a sequence incremented on-demand:
var foobar = function(i){var count = count || i; return function(){return ++count;}}
baz = foobar(1);
console.log("first call: " + baz()); //2
console.log("second call: " + baz()); //3
The differences are summarized as follows:
Anonymous functions Defined functions
Cannot be used as a method Can be used as a method of an object
Exists only in the scope in which it is defined Exists within the object it is defined in
Can only be called in the scope in which it is defined Can be called at any point in the code
Can be reassigned a new value or deleted Cannot be deleted or changed
References
AS3 Fundamentals: Functions
I'm trying to learn closures and I think the example that I have created is a practical use case. You can run a snippet and see the result in the console.
We have two separate users who have separate data. Each of them can see the actual state and update it.
function createUserWarningData(user) {
const data = {
name: user,
numberOfWarnings: 0,
};
function addWarning() {
data.numberOfWarnings = data.numberOfWarnings + 1;
}
function getUserData() {
console.log(data);
return data;
}
return {
getUserData: getUserData,
addWarning: addWarning,
};
}
const user1 = createUserWarningData("Thomas");
const user2 = createUserWarningData("Alex");
//USER 1
user1.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
user1.addWarning(); // Add one warning to specific user
user1.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
//USER2
user2.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
user2.addWarning(); // Add one warning to specific user
user2.addWarning(); // Add one warning to specific user
user2.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
Reference: Practical usage of closures
In practice, closures may create elegant designs, allowing customization of various calculations, deferred calls, callbacks, creating encapsulated scope, etc.
An example is the sort method of arrays which accepts the sort condition function as an argument:
[1, 2, 3].sort(function (a, b) {
... // Sort conditions
});
Mapping functionals as the map method of arrays which maps a new array by the condition of the functional argument:
[1, 2, 3].map(function (element) {
return element * 2;
}); // [2, 4, 6]
Often it is convenient to implement search functions with using functional arguments defining almost unlimited conditions for search:
someCollection.find(function (element) {
return element.someProperty == 'searchCondition';
});
Also, we may note applying functionals as, for example, a forEach method which applies a function to an array of elements:
[1, 2, 3].forEach(function (element) {
if (element % 2 != 0) {
alert(element);
}
}); // 1, 3
A function is applied to arguments (to a list of arguments — in apply, and to positioned arguments — in call):
(function () {
alert([].join.call(arguments, ';')); // 1;2;3
}).apply(this, [1, 2, 3]);
Deferred calls:
var a = 10;
setTimeout(function () {
alert(a); // 10, after one second
}, 1000);
Callback functions:
var x = 10;
// Only for example
xmlHttpRequestObject.onreadystatechange = function () {
// Callback, which will be called deferral ,
// when data will be ready;
// variable "x" here is available,
// regardless that context in which,
// it was created already finished
alert(x); // 10
};
Creation of an encapsulated scope for the purpose of hiding auxiliary objects:
var foo = {};
(function (object) {
var x = 10;
object.getX = function _getX() {
return x;
};
})(foo);
alert(foo.getX()); // Get closured "x" – 10
In the given sample, the value of the enclosed variable 'counter' is protected and can be altered only using the given functions (increment, decrement). Because it is in a closure,
var MyCounter = function (){
var counter = 0;
return {
increment:function () {return counter += 1;},
decrement:function () {return counter -= 1;},
get:function () {return counter;}
};
};
var x = MyCounter();
// Or
var y = MyCounter();
alert(x.get()); // 0
alert(x.increment()); // 1
alert(x.increment()); // 2
alert(y.increment()); // 1
alert(x.get()); // x is still 2
Everyone has explained the practical use cases of closure: the definition and a couple of examples.
I want to contribute a list of use cases of Closures:
suppose you want to count no of times a button is clicked; Closure is the best choice.
Throttling and Debounce
Currying
Memorize
Maintaining state in the async world
Functions like once
setTimeouts
Iterators
I have an event listener inside of an if statement to make a menu slide in.
const burger = document.querySelector(".c-brgr");
if (!menuOpen) {
burger.addEventListener('click', function () {
if (!menuOpen) {
nav.classList.add("menu-is-open");
menuOpen = true;
} else {
nav.classList.remove("menu-is-open");
menuOpen = false;
}
});
}
I also have a div within the HTML that I'd like when clicked, to also close the menu. I could just make another.
const closeArea = document.querySelector(".js-close-area");
if (!menuOpen) {
closeArea.addEventListener('click', function () {
if (!menuOpen) {
// as above
} else {
// "
}
});
}
This time, instead of burger, I use the other element. closeArea. This will repeat code, however, unnecessarily.
Is there a way I can use just one if statement for both addEventListeners?
Yes you can add both to an array, and loop through them as follows
const burger = document.querySelector(".c-brgr");
const closeArea = document.querySelector(".js-close-area");
if (!menuOpen) {
[burger, closeArea].forEach(element => {
element.addEventListener('click', function () {
if (!menuOpen) {
// as above
} else {
// "
}
});
}
}
You are currently using an anonymous function as your event listener. To avoid repeating the code, use a named function instead:
function toggleMenu() {
// if statement goes here
}
Now you can add this as the event listener on any item you want:
burger.addEventListener('click', toggleMenu);
closeArea.addEventListener('click', toggleMenu);
Below is a concept to use function that return functions. This may sound complicated at first, but you can have the advantage later by wrapping in some extra variables that you like to access later.
This way, you are able to create multiple functions, each with their own separate and independent state or values. All invoked from the same wrapper function.
This method will scale easily if you add more buttons as you can store separate state for each button while using the same code.
// create a function that returns a function
function binder(param1, param2) {
return function () {
// triggered on event call, so this will be executed later
console.log(param1, param2);
}
}
// here are variables you want to access later
var var1 = 'foo';
var var2 = 'bar';
// pass the variables to the binder function
// this will create a function with access to the variables you need
closeArea.addEventListener('click', binder(var1, var2));
So you can do this
const burger = document.querySelector(".c-brgr");
// Create a function to create a handler function that has access to it's own variables later on
function createMenuClickHandler(nav) {
// Given the started value is always the same, you can choose to not pass parameters
// every time you call this function, you get a function with it's own independent menuOpen value
const menuOpen = false;
return function() {
// You usual business
if (!menuOpen) {
nav.classList.add("menu-is-open");
menuOpen = true;
} else {
nav.classList.remove("menu-is-open");
menuOpen = false;
}
}
}
// You may store the result of createMenuClickHandler if you want to share the same state on other places in your code as well
// If you want a separate state, call createMenuClickHandler again
closeArea.addEventListener('click', createMenuClickHandler(burger));
I'm trying my hardest to wrap my head around JavaScript closures.
I get that by returning an inner function, it will have access to any variable defined in its immediate parent.
Where would this be useful to me? Perhaps I haven't quite got my head around it yet. Most of the examples I have seen online don't provide any real world code, just vague examples.
Can someone show me a real world use of a closure?
Is this one, for example?
var warnUser = function (msg) {
var calledCount = 0;
return function() {
calledCount++;
alert(msg + '\nYou have been warned ' + calledCount + ' times.');
};
};
var warnForTamper = warnUser('You can not tamper with our HTML.');
warnForTamper();
warnForTamper();
Suppose, you want to count the number of times user clicked a button on a webpage.
For this, you are triggering a function on onclick event of button to update the count of the variable
<button onclick="updateClickCount()">click me</button>
Now there could be many approaches like:
You could use a global variable, and a function to increase the counter:
var counter = 0;
function updateClickCount() {
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
But, the pitfall is that any script on the page can change the counter, without calling updateClickCount().
Now, you might be thinking of declaring the variable inside the function:
function updateClickCount() {
var counter = 0;
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
But, hey! Every time updateClickCount() function is called, the counter is set to 1 again.
Thinking about nested functions?
Nested functions have access to the scope "above" them.
In this example, the inner function updateClickCount() has access to the counter variable in the parent function countWrapper():
function countWrapper() {
var counter = 0;
function updateClickCount() {
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
updateClickCount();
return counter;
}
This could have solved the counter dilemma, if you could reach the updateClickCount() function from the outside and you also need to find a way to execute counter = 0 only once not everytime.
Closure to the rescue! (self-invoking function):
var updateClickCount = (function(){
var counter = 0;
return function(){
++counter;
// Do something with counter
}
})();
The self-invoking function only runs once. It sets the counter to zero (0), and returns a function expression.
This way updateClickCount becomes a function. The "wonderful" part is that it can access the counter in the parent scope.
This is called a JavaScript closure. It makes it possible for a function to have "private" variables.
The counter is protected by the scope of the anonymous function, and can only be changed using the updateClickCount() function!
A more lively example on closures
<script>
var updateClickCount = (function(){
var counter = 0;
return function(){
++counter;
document.getElementById("spnCount").innerHTML = counter;
}
})();
</script>
<html>
<button onclick="updateClickCount()">click me</button>
<div> you've clicked
<span id="spnCount"> 0 </span> times!
</div>
</html>
Reference: JavaScript Closures
I've used closures to do things like:
a = (function () {
var privatefunction = function () {
alert('hello');
}
return {
publicfunction : function () {
privatefunction();
}
}
})();
As you can see there, a is now an object, with a method publicfunction ( a.publicfunction() ) which calls privatefunction, which only exists inside the closure. You can not call privatefunction directly (i.e. a.privatefunction() ), just publicfunction().
It's a minimal example, but maybe you can see uses to it? We used this to enforce public/private methods.
The example you give is an excellent one. Closures are an abstraction mechanism that allow you to separate concerns very cleanly. Your example is a case of separating instrumentation (counting calls) from semantics (an error-reporting API). Other uses include:
Passing parameterised behaviour into an algorithm (classic higher-order programming):
function proximity_sort(arr, midpoint) {
arr.sort(function(a, b) { a -= midpoint; b -= midpoint; return a*a - b*b; });
}
Simulating object oriented programming:
function counter() {
var a = 0;
return {
inc: function() { ++a; },
dec: function() { --a; },
get: function() { return a; },
reset: function() { a = 0; }
}
}
Implementing exotic flow control, such as jQuery's Event handling and AJAX APIs.
JavaScript closures can be used to implement throttle and debounce functionality in your application.
Throttling
Throttling puts a limit on as a maximum number of times a function can be called over time. As in "execute this function at most once every 100 milliseconds."
Code:
const throttle = (func, limit) => {
let isThrottling
return function() {
const args = arguments
const context = this
if (!isThrottling) {
func.apply(context, args)
isThrottling = true
setTimeout(() => isThrottling = false, limit)
}
}
}
Debouncing
Debouncing puts a limit on a function not be called again until a certain amount of time has passed without it being called. As in "execute this function only if 100 milliseconds have passed without it being called."
Code:
const debounce = (func, delay) => {
let debouncing
return function() {
const context = this
const args = arguments
clearTimeout(debouncing)
debouncing = setTimeout(() => func.apply(context, args), delay)
}
}
As you can see closures helped in implementing two beautiful features which every web application should have to provide smooth UI experience functionality.
Yes, that is a good example of a useful closure. The call to warnUser creates the calledCount variable in its scope and returns an anonymous function which is stored in the warnForTamper variable. Because there is still a closure making use of the calledCount variable, it isn't deleted upon the function's exit, so each call to the warnForTamper() will increase the scoped variable and alert the value.
The most common issue I see on Stack Overflow is where someone wants to "delay" use of a variable that is increased upon each loop, but because the variable is scoped then each reference to the variable would be after the loop has ended, resulting in the end state of the variable:
for (var i = 0; i < someVar.length; i++)
window.setTimeout(function () {
alert("Value of i was "+i+" when this timer was set" )
}, 10000);
This would result in every alert showing the same value of i, the value it was increased to when the loop ended. The solution is to create a new closure, a separate scope for the variable. This can be done using an instantly executed anonymous function, which receives the variable and stores its state as an argument:
for (var i = 0; i < someVar.length; i++)
(function (i) {
window.setTimeout(function () {
alert("Value of i was " + i + " when this timer was set")
}, 10000);
})(i);
In the JavaScript (or any ECMAScript) language, in particular, closures are useful in hiding the implementation of functionality while still revealing the interface.
For example, imagine you are writing a class of date utility methods and you want to allow users to look up weekday names by index, but you don't want them to be able to modify the array of names you use under the hood.
var dateUtil = {
weekdayShort: (function() {
var days = ['Mon', 'Tue', 'Wed', 'Thu', 'Fri', 'Sat', 'Sun'];
return function(x) {
if ((x != parseInt(x)) || (x < 1) || (x > 7)) {
throw new Error("invalid weekday number");
}
return days[x - 1];
};
}())
};
Note that the days array could simply be stored as a property of the dateUtil object, but then it would be visible to users of the script and they could even change it if they wanted, without even needing your source code. However, since it's enclosed by the anonymous function which returns the date lookup function it is only accessible by the lookup function so it is now tamperproof.
There is a section on Practical Closures at the Mozilla Developer Network.
If you're comfortable with the concept of instantiating a class in the object-oriented sense (i.e. to create an object of that class) then you're close to understanding closures.
Think of it this way: when you instantiate two Person objects you know that the class member variable "Name" is not shared between instances; each object has its own 'copy'. Similarly, when you create a closure, the free variable ('calledCount' in your example above) is bound to the 'instance' of the function.
I think your conceptual leap is slightly hampered by the fact that every function/closure returned by the warnUser function (aside: that's a higher-order function) closure binds 'calledCount' with the same initial value (0), whereas often when creating closures it is more useful to pass different initializers into the higher-order function, much like passing different values to the constructor of a class.
So, suppose when 'calledCount' reaches a certain value you want to end the user's session; you might want different values for that depending on whether the request comes in from the local network or the big bad internet (yes, it's a contrived example). To achieve this, you could pass different initial values for calledCount into warnUser (i.e. -3, or 0?).
Part of the problem with the literature is the nomenclature used to describe them ("lexical scope", "free variables"). Don't let it fool you, closures are more simple than would appear... prima facie ;-)
Here, I have a greeting that I want to say several times. If I create a closure, I can simply call that function to record the greeting. If I don't create the closure, I have to pass my name in every single time.
Without a closure (https://jsfiddle.net/lukeschlangen/pw61qrow/3/):
function greeting(firstName, lastName) {
var message = "Hello " + firstName + " " + lastName + "!";
console.log(message);
}
greeting("Billy", "Bob");
greeting("Billy", "Bob");
greeting("Billy", "Bob");
greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
With a closure (https://jsfiddle.net/lukeschlangen/Lb5cfve9/3/):
function greeting(firstName, lastName) {
var message = "Hello " + firstName + " " + lastName + "!";
return function() {
console.log(message);
}
}
var greetingBilly = greeting("Billy", "Bob");
var greetingLuke = greeting("Luke", "Schlangen");
greetingBilly();
greetingBilly();
greetingBilly();
greetingLuke();
greetingLuke();
greetingLuke();
Another common use for closures is to bind this in a method to a specific object, allowing it to be called elsewhere (such as as an event handler).
function bind(obj, method) {
if (typeof method == 'string') {
method = obj[method];
}
return function () {
method.apply(obj, arguments);
}
}
...
document.body.addEventListener('mousemove', bind(watcher, 'follow'), true);
Whenever a mousemove event fires, watcher.follow(evt) is called.
Closures are also an essential part of higher-order functions, allowing the very common pattern of rewriting multiple similar functions as a single higher order function by parameterizing the dissimilar portions. As an abstract example,
foo_a = function (...) {A a B}
foo_b = function (...) {A b B}
foo_c = function (...) {A c B}
becomes
fooer = function (x) {
return function (...) {A x B}
}
where A and B aren't syntactical units but source code strings (not string literals).
See "Streamlining my javascript with a function" for a concrete example.
Here I have one simple example of the closure concept which we can use for in our E-commerce site or many others as well.
I am adding my JSFiddle link with the example. It contains a small product list of three items and one cart counter.
JSFiddle
// Counter closure implemented function;
var CartCouter = function(){
var counter = 0;
function changeCounter(val){
counter += val
}
return {
increment: function(){
changeCounter(1);
},
decrement: function(){
changeCounter(-1);
},
value: function(){
return counter;
}
}
}
var cartCount = CartCouter();
function updateCart() {
document.getElementById('cartcount').innerHTML = cartCount.value();
}
var productlist = document.getElementsByClassName('item');
for(var i = 0; i< productlist.length; i++){
productlist[i].addEventListener('click', function(){
if(this.className.indexOf('selected') < 0){
this.className += " selected";
cartCount.increment();
updateCart();
}
else{
this.className = this.className.replace("selected", "");
cartCount.decrement();
updateCart();
}
})
}
.productslist{
padding: 10px;
}
ul li{
display: inline-block;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid #DDD;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;
cursor: pointer;
}
.selected{
background-color: #7CFEF0;
color: #333;
}
.cartdiv{
position: relative;
float: right;
padding: 5px;
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 1px solid #F1F1F1;
}
<div>
<h3>
Practical use of a JavaScript closure concept/private variable.
</h3>
<div class="cartdiv">
<span id="cartcount">0</span>
</div>
<div class="productslist">
<ul>
<li class="item">Product 1</li>
<li class="item">Product 2</li>
<li class="item">Product 3</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
Use of Closures:
Closures are one of the most powerful features of JavaScript. JavaScript allows for the nesting of functions and grants the inner function full access to all the variables and functions defined inside the outer function (and all other variables and functions that the outer function has access to). However, the outer function does not have access to the variables and functions defined inside the inner function.
This provides a sort of security for the variables of the inner function. Also, since the inner function has access to the scope of the outer function, the variables and functions defined in the outer function will live longer than the outer function itself, if the inner function manages to survive beyond the life of the outer function. A closure is created when the inner function is somehow made available to any scope outside the outer function.
Example:
<script>
var createPet = function(name) {
var sex;
return {
setName: function(newName) {
name = newName;
},
getName: function() {
return name;
},
getSex: function() {
return sex;
},
setSex: function(newSex) {
if(typeof newSex == "string" && (newSex.toLowerCase() == "male" || newSex.toLowerCase() == "female")) {
sex = newSex;
}
}
}
}
var pet = createPet("Vivie");
console.log(pet.getName()); // Vivie
console.log(pet.setName("Oliver"));
console.log(pet.setSex("male"));
console.log(pet.getSex()); // male
console.log(pet.getName()); // Oliver
</script>
In the code above, the name variable of the outer function is accessible to the inner functions, and there is no other way to access the inner variables except through the inner functions. The inner variables of the inner function act as safe stores for the inner functions. They hold "persistent", yet secure, data for the inner functions to work with. The functions do not even have to be assigned to a variable, or have a name.
read here for detail.
Explaining the practical use for a closure in JavaScript
When we create a function inside another function, we are creating a closure. Closures are powerful because they are capable of reading and manipulating the data of its outer functions. Whenever a function is invoked, a new scope is created for that call. The local variable declared inside the function belong to that scope and they can only be accessed from that function. When the function has finished the execution, the scope is usually destroyed.
A simple example of such function is this:
function buildName(name) {
const greeting = "Hello, " + name;
return greeting;
}
In above example, the function buildName() declares a local variable greeting and returns it. Every function call creates a new scope with a new local variable. After the function is done executing, we have no way to refer to that scope again, so it’s garbage collected.
But how about when we have a link to that scope?
Let’s look at the next function:
function buildName(name) {
const greeting = "Hello, " + name + " Welcome ";
const sayName = function() {
console.log(greeting);
};
return sayName;
}
const sayMyName = buildName("Mandeep");
sayMyName(); // Hello, Mandeep Welcome
The function sayName() from this example is a closure. The sayName() function has its own local scope (with variable welcome) and has also access to the outer (enclosing) function’s scope. In this case, the variable greeting from buildName().
After the execution of buildName is done, the scope is not destroyed in this case. The sayMyName() function still has access to it, so it won’t be garbage collected. However, there is no other way of accessing data from the outer scope except the closure. The closure serves as the gateway between the global context and the outer scope.
The JavaScript module pattern uses closures. Its nice pattern allows you to have something alike "public" and "private" variables.
var myNamespace = (function () {
var myPrivateVar, myPrivateMethod;
// A private counter variable
myPrivateVar = 0;
// A private function which logs any arguments
myPrivateMethod = function(foo) {
console.log(foo);
};
return {
// A public variable
myPublicVar: "foo",
// A public function utilizing privates
myPublicFunction: function(bar) {
// Increment our private counter
myPrivateVar++;
// Call our private method using bar
myPrivateMethod(bar);
}
};
})();
I like Mozilla's function factory example.
function makeAdder(x) {
return function(y) {
return x + y;
};
}
var addFive = makeAdder(5);
console.assert(addFive(2) === 7);
console.assert(addFive(-5) === 0);
This thread has helped me immensely in gaining a better understanding of how closures work.
I've since done some experimentation of my own and came up with this fairly simple code which may help some other people see how closures can be used in a practical way and how to use the closure at different levels to maintain variables similar to static and/or global variables without risk of them getting overwritten or confused with global variables.
This keeps track of button clicks, both at a local level for each individual button and a global level, counting every button click, contributing towards a single figure. Note I haven't used any global variables to do this, which is kind of the point of the exercise - having a handler that can be applied to any button that also contributes to something globally.
Please experts, do let me know if I've committed any bad practices here! I'm still learning this stuff myself.
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Closures on button presses</title>
<script type="text/javascript">
window.addEventListener("load" , function () {
/*
Grab the function from the first closure,
and assign to a temporary variable
this will set the totalButtonCount variable
that is used to count the total of all button clicks
*/
var buttonHandler = buttonsCount();
/*
Using the result from the first closure (a function is returned)
assign and run the sub closure that carries the
individual variable for button count and assign to the click handlers
*/
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click" , buttonHandler() );
document.getElementById("button2").addEventListener("click" , buttonHandler() );
document.getElementById("button3").addEventListener("click" , buttonHandler() );
// Now that buttonHandler has served its purpose it can be deleted if needs be
buttonHandler = null;
});
function buttonsCount() {
/*
First closure level
- totalButtonCount acts as a sort of global counter to count any button presses
*/
var totalButtonCount = 0;
return function () {
// Second closure level
var myButtonCount = 0;
return function (event) {
// Actual function that is called on the button click
event.preventDefault();
/*
Increment the button counts.
myButtonCount only exists in the scope that is
applied to each event handler and therefore acts
to count each button individually, whereas because
of the first closure totalButtonCount exists at
the scope just outside, it maintains a sort
of static or global variable state
*/
totalButtonCount++;
myButtonCount++;
/*
Do something with the values ... fairly pointless
but it shows that each button contributes to both
its own variable and the outer variable in the
first closure
*/
console.log("Total button clicks: "+totalButtonCount);
console.log("This button count: "+myButtonCount);
}
}
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
Button 1
Button 2
Button 3
</body>
</html>
There are various use cases of closures.Here, I am going to explain most important usage of Closure concept.
Closure can be used to create private methods and variables just like an object-oriented language like java, c++ and so on. Once you implemented private methods and variables, your variables defined inside a function won't be accessible by window object. This helps in data hiding and data security.
const privateClass = () => {
let name = "sundar";
function setName(changeName) {
name = changeName;
}
function getName() {
return name;
}
return {
setName: setName,
getName: getName,
};
};
let javaLikeObject = privateClass(); \\ similar to new Class() in OOPS.
console.log(javaLikeObject.getName()); \\this will give sundar
javaLikeObject.setName("suresh");
console.log(javaLikeObject.getName()); \\this will give suresh
Another real-life example of closure :
Create index.html:
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<title>Program with Javascript</title>
</head>
<body>
<p id="first"></p>
<p id="second"></p>
<button onclick="applyingConcepts()">Click</button>
<script src="./index.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
2)In index.js:
let count = 0;
return () => {
document.getElementById("first").innerHTML = count++;
};
})();
In this example, when you click a button, then your count will be updated on p#id.
Note: You might be wondering what's special in this code. When you inspect, you will notice that you can't change the value of count using the window object. This means you have declared private variable count so this prevents your states from being spoiled by the client.
I wrote an article a while back about how closures can be used to simplify event-handling code. It compares ASP.NET event handling to client-side jQuery.
http://www.hackification.com/2009/02/20/closures-simplify-event-handling-code/
Much of the code we write in front-end JavaScript is event-based — we define some behavior, then attach it to an event that is triggered by the user (such as a click or a keypress). Our code is generally attached as a callback: a single function which is executed in response to the event.
size12, size14, and size16 are now functions which will resize the body text to 12, 14, and 16 pixels, respectively. We can attach them to buttons (in this case links) as follows:
function makeSizer(size) {
return function() {
document.body.style.fontSize = size + 'px';
};
}
var size12 = makeSizer(12);
var size14 = makeSizer(14);
var size16 = makeSizer(16);
document.getElementById('size-12').onclick = size12;
document.getElementById('size-14').onclick = size14;
document.getElementById('size-16').onclick = size16;
Fiddle
Closures are a useful way to create generators, a sequence incremented on-demand:
var foobar = function(i){var count = count || i; return function(){return ++count;}}
baz = foobar(1);
console.log("first call: " + baz()); //2
console.log("second call: " + baz()); //3
The differences are summarized as follows:
Anonymous functions Defined functions
Cannot be used as a method Can be used as a method of an object
Exists only in the scope in which it is defined Exists within the object it is defined in
Can only be called in the scope in which it is defined Can be called at any point in the code
Can be reassigned a new value or deleted Cannot be deleted or changed
References
AS3 Fundamentals: Functions
I'm trying to learn closures and I think the example that I have created is a practical use case. You can run a snippet and see the result in the console.
We have two separate users who have separate data. Each of them can see the actual state and update it.
function createUserWarningData(user) {
const data = {
name: user,
numberOfWarnings: 0,
};
function addWarning() {
data.numberOfWarnings = data.numberOfWarnings + 1;
}
function getUserData() {
console.log(data);
return data;
}
return {
getUserData: getUserData,
addWarning: addWarning,
};
}
const user1 = createUserWarningData("Thomas");
const user2 = createUserWarningData("Alex");
//USER 1
user1.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
user1.addWarning(); // Add one warning to specific user
user1.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
//USER2
user2.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
user2.addWarning(); // Add one warning to specific user
user2.addWarning(); // Add one warning to specific user
user2.getUserData(); // Returning data user object
Reference: Practical usage of closures
In practice, closures may create elegant designs, allowing customization of various calculations, deferred calls, callbacks, creating encapsulated scope, etc.
An example is the sort method of arrays which accepts the sort condition function as an argument:
[1, 2, 3].sort(function (a, b) {
... // Sort conditions
});
Mapping functionals as the map method of arrays which maps a new array by the condition of the functional argument:
[1, 2, 3].map(function (element) {
return element * 2;
}); // [2, 4, 6]
Often it is convenient to implement search functions with using functional arguments defining almost unlimited conditions for search:
someCollection.find(function (element) {
return element.someProperty == 'searchCondition';
});
Also, we may note applying functionals as, for example, a forEach method which applies a function to an array of elements:
[1, 2, 3].forEach(function (element) {
if (element % 2 != 0) {
alert(element);
}
}); // 1, 3
A function is applied to arguments (to a list of arguments — in apply, and to positioned arguments — in call):
(function () {
alert([].join.call(arguments, ';')); // 1;2;3
}).apply(this, [1, 2, 3]);
Deferred calls:
var a = 10;
setTimeout(function () {
alert(a); // 10, after one second
}, 1000);
Callback functions:
var x = 10;
// Only for example
xmlHttpRequestObject.onreadystatechange = function () {
// Callback, which will be called deferral ,
// when data will be ready;
// variable "x" here is available,
// regardless that context in which,
// it was created already finished
alert(x); // 10
};
Creation of an encapsulated scope for the purpose of hiding auxiliary objects:
var foo = {};
(function (object) {
var x = 10;
object.getX = function _getX() {
return x;
};
})(foo);
alert(foo.getX()); // Get closured "x" – 10
In the given sample, the value of the enclosed variable 'counter' is protected and can be altered only using the given functions (increment, decrement). Because it is in a closure,
var MyCounter = function (){
var counter = 0;
return {
increment:function () {return counter += 1;},
decrement:function () {return counter -= 1;},
get:function () {return counter;}
};
};
var x = MyCounter();
// Or
var y = MyCounter();
alert(x.get()); // 0
alert(x.increment()); // 1
alert(x.increment()); // 2
alert(y.increment()); // 1
alert(x.get()); // x is still 2
Everyone has explained the practical use cases of closure: the definition and a couple of examples.
I want to contribute a list of use cases of Closures:
suppose you want to count no of times a button is clicked; Closure is the best choice.
Throttling and Debounce
Currying
Memorize
Maintaining state in the async world
Functions like once
setTimeouts
Iterators
I'm really sorry, but i can't figure out why it doesn't work. printStr() can access variable only defined in Foo constructor, but not in private function, that got triggered on mousedown event. Is there any way to access string without declaring printStr inside getBotheredByBrendanEich func?
function Foo(elem) {
elem.on('mousedown', getBotheredByBrendanEich);
function getBotheredByBrendanEich() {
var string = 'its just werks!';
elem.on('mouseup', printStr);
}
function printStr() {
console.log(string);
}
}
var test = new Foo($('#test'));
Your variable string is a local variable inside of the function get...() and is ONLY available inside of that scope. Local variables are only available within the function they are declared in, which in this case is your get...() function
If you want it available in a broader scope so that printStr() can use it, then you have to declare it at a higher scope.
You could solve this by using an anonymous function declared in the same scope:
function Foo(elem) {
elem.on('mousedown', getBotheredByBrendanEich);
function getBotheredByBrendanEich() {
var str = 'its just werks!';
elem.on('mouseup', function() {
console.log(str);
});
}
}
var test = new Foo($('#test'));
Or, you could pass the argument to the event handler with .bind():
function Foo(elem) {
elem.on('mousedown', getBotheredByBrendanEich);
function getBotheredByBrendanEich() {
var string = 'its just werks!';
elem.on('mouseup', printStr.bind(this, string));
}
function printStr(arg) {
console.log(arg);
}
}
var test = new Foo($('#test'));
Or, you could move the variable to a higher scope so it can be shared:
function Foo(elem) {
elem.on('mousedown', getBotheredByBrendanEich);
var str = 'its just werks!';
function getBotheredByBrendanEich() {
elem.on('mouseup', printStr);
}
function printStr() {
console.log(str);
}
}
var test = new Foo($('#test'));
In all cases though, this structure is troublesome because you've adding a new mouseup event handler everytime the mousedown event occurs. This means you will get multiple mouseup handlers after only a couple clicks. This is rarely ever what you really want to do.
I would suggest this which will not suffer from that problem:
function Foo(elem) {
var str = 'its just werks!';
elem.on('mousedown', function() {
// whatever code you want here
});
elem.on('mouseup', function() {
console.log(str);
});
}
var test = new Foo($('#test'));
One more comment. Your code doesn't show any reason to actually use a constructor here. It appears like you could just implement a normal function call since there is no object instance data.
I have a variable created with setInterval called cycle1. It is created with setInterval inside of a prototyped function to an object called eGi, which is the same as $_. After creating it, it still fires, but is inaccessible to the rest of the script and the console. When I try to clear this interval from another prototyped function, nothing happens.
eGi.prototype.startGame = function() {
//other code...
if (somethingOrOther) {
var somethingElse = confirm("start interval?");
if (somethingElse) {
this.cycle1 = setInterval($_.cycle,toMS(INTERVAL_SECONDS));
}
} else {
this.cycle1 = setInterval($_.cycle,toMS(INTERVAL_SECONDS));
}
};
then when i try and stop it in another function
eGi.prototype.gameOver = function() {
clearInterval(this.cycle1);
//other code...
if (restart) {
$_.startGame();
} else {
$_.mainMenu();
}
};
It never gets cleared, and seems to be created again in the calling of $_.startGame. I can't even access it from the Chrome console using $_.cycle1 or the eGi instance variable, egi.cycle1. The strange thing is, this works for accessing any other variable that belongs to my eGi object:
var eGi = function(console,cDom,ctxt,game,devMode) {
$_ = this;
this.game = game;
this.cDom = cDom; //specifically, these objects control the canvas' DOM
this.ctxt = ctxt; //and the CanvasRenderingContext2D
}
eGi.prototype.mainMenu = function() {
this.ctxt.fillText("Hello",250,250); //this works just fine
//etc
};
Why isn't it being cleared?
Full code/game here.
It's a nice game...
The problem is you are referring to "this" inside gameover which doesn't contain reference to cycle1 (undefined).
Instead you have to store "cycle1" as part of an object which can be referenced from your other function (in this case gameover)
Making variables as global is not a good thing. Instead you can store the "cycle1" as part of eGi or any such namespace or object.
Refer here (working code): JSFiddle implementation
Javascript code (start and stop are input buttons)
var eGi = {};
$('#start').click(function start() {
var somethingElse = confirm("start interval?");
if (somethingElse) {
eGi.cycle1 = setInterval(function(){
console.log('Running...');
},1000);
}
});
$('#stop').click(function stop(){
clearInterval(eGi.cycle1);
});