I'm newbie for Sequelize
I have a problem with "Nested Eager Loading"
I have 2 Table with 1-to-many relationship
Comment Table
User Table
I use this code for the query
Comment.findAll({
include: [User]
})
I got
{
id: 1,
comment: "test",
user: {
id: 3,
name: "someone"
}
}
But I expected result like this
{
id: 1,
comment: "test",
user_id: 3,
user_name: "someone"
}
I read several stackoverflow post it has a solution but work for version 3.3
Comment.findAll({
attributes: ['id', 'name', ['user.id','user_id'], ['user.name','user_name']]
include: [{ model: User, attributes:[], nested: false, required: true }]
})
Comment.findAll({
attributes: ['id', 'name', [Sequelize.col('user.id'),'user_id'], [Sequelize.col('user.name'),'user_name']]
include: [{ model: User, attributes:[], nested: false, required: true }]
})
but it's not work for me.
now I use sequelize 5.5.1 how can I implement it.
Can someone help me, please?
You can use this code to get the desired output:
Since Sequelize is promised based , it is recommend to use then and catch.
Comment.findAll({
include: [User]
}).then(result=>
{
let obj=
{
id: result.item,
comment: result.comment,
user_id: result.user.id,
user_name: result.user.name
};
console.log(JSON.stringify(obj));
}).catch(err=>
{
console.log(err);
});
Related
I am trying to findAll records included nested tables, but did not understand how could I filter included tables by where clause. Here are the words:
const players = await PlayerService.findPlayers({
attributes: { exclude: ['password'] },
include: [
{ all: true },
{
model: Team,
as: 'captainTeams',
attributes: {exclude: ['createdAt', 'updatedAt']}
},
{
model: Team,
as: 'teams',
where: { type: 1 },
required: true,
through: {attributes: []},
attributes: {exclude: ['createdAt', 'updatedAt']}
}
]
})
Here is the result:
If I delete where and required from including Team clause, here is the result:
I would like to filter teams.type=2. Could you help me ?
Background
Here's part of my User model:
const Group = require("./Group")
...
groups: {
type: [{ type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: Group }],
default: [],
},
And here's my Group model:
module.exports = mongoose.model(
"Group",
new Schema(
{
name: {
type: String,
required: true,
unique: true,
},
/**
* Array of User ObjectIDs that have owner rights on this group
*/
owners: {
type: [{ type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: User }],
default: [],
},
},
{
timestamps: true,
}
)
)
The Code
Here's the code I'm running to try and populate:
const user = await (await User.findOne({ _id: ... })).execPopulate("Group")
console.log(user.groups)
My console.log is outputting an array of object IDs, when I'd like it to output an actual Group document.
Attempted solutions
I've tried changing my ref to be using the string ("Group"), I've tried arranging my query differently, etc. I'm not sure how I'd go about doing this.
Apologies in advance if this is a duplicate, I've done my best to search but can't really find a solution that works for me.
Specifically, what do I need help with?
I'm trying to create a 'link' between a user model and a group model. In my console.log, I expect it to output a Group document; but it outputs an object ID (which is how it's stored raw in the database, meaning that Mongoose isn't transforming it correctly)
When you change execPopulate to populate like:
async function findUserAndPopulate(userId){
const response = await User.findOne({
_id: userId,
}).populate('groups')
console.log("response",response)
}
You got:
{
groups: [
{
owners: [Array],
_id: 5ecc637916a2223f15581ec7,
name: 'Crazy',
createdAt: 2020-05-26T00:31:53.379Z,
updatedAt: 2020-05-26T00:31:53.379Z,
__v: 0
}
],
_id: 5ecc6206820d583b99b6b595,
fullname: 'James R',
createdAt: 2020-05-26T00:25:42.948Z,
updatedAt: 2020-05-26T00:36:12.186Z,
__v: 1
}
So you can access the user.groups
See the doc: https://mongoosejs.com/docs/populate.html
So, I have an existing MySQL database that I'm trying to connect to with Sequelize in Node that has a products table, a categories table and a categories_products table. What I want to do is return products, with each product containing all of the categories it belongs to. Here's what I've got:
// Declare Product Model
const Product = sequelize.define('products', {
name: Sequelize.STRING,
description: Sequelize.STRING,
single_price: Sequelize.BOOLEAN,
oz_price: Sequelize.FLOAT,
half_price: Sequelize.FLOAT,
quarter_price: Sequelize.FLOAT,
eigth_price: Sequelize.FLOAT,
gram_price: Sequelize.FLOAT,
unit_price: Sequelize.FLOAT
},
{
underscored: true
});
// Declare Category Model
const Category = sequelize.define('categories', {
name: Sequelize.STRING,
parent_id: Sequelize.INTEGER,
picture_file_name: Sequelize.STRING
},
{
underscored: true
});
// Join Table
const ProductCategory = sequelize.define('categories_products', {
product_id: Sequelize.INTEGER,
category_id: Sequelize.INTEGER,
}, {
timestamps: false,
underscored: true
});
// Do this because there is no id column on ProductCategory table
ProductCategory.removeAttribute('id');
Category.hasMany(Category, { as: 'children', foreignKey: 'parent_id' });
ProductCategory.belongsTo(Product);
ProductCategory.belongsTo(Category);
Product.hasMany(ProductCategory);
Category.hasMany(ProductCategory);
Using this setup, I query as follows:
Product.findAll({
include: [{
model: ProductCategory,
include: [ Category ]
}],
where: { active: true },
limit: 10
}).then(prods => {
res.send(prods);
}).catch(err => {
res.status(500).send(err);
});
I get back my products and each one has an array of categories, BUT each product only shows a max of one category. I have products that should have many categories, but it only shows the first.
Am I missing something? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I think you should use belongsToMany association here.
You can define association like this
Product.belongsToMany(Category, { through: ProductCategory, foreignKey: 'product_id' });
Category.belongsToMany(Product, { through: ProductCategory, foreignKey: 'category_id' });
and the query can be
Product.findAll({
include: [Category]
}).then((res) => {
console.log(res);
})
Though the questioner might have gotten the solution but I ran into this composite key table problem and this is the solution with code example. Notice the "through" keyword. That is what solves the association where you want to limit your findings to say a category as AbhinavD asked above. Your category id would go in the literal expression. Applies to findAll too.
const products = await Product.findAndCountAll({
include: [Category],
through: { where: { category_id: `${category_id}` } },
attributes: [
'product_id',
'name',
],
limit: limitPage,
offset: offsett,
});
Is there a way to find models by a condition that applies to its own field or to its association's field?
Given models Model and Association, where each Model has one Association.
const Model = sequelize.define('model', {
name: sequelize.STRING,
});
const Association = sequelize.define('association', {
name: sequelize.STRING,
});
Association.belongsTo(Model);
Model.hasOne(Association);
I want to find all Models, that either has a name equal to "text", or has an Association with a name equal to "text".
So far I come up with the solution with Sequelize.literal, that doesn't look robust enough.
Model.findAll({
attributes: ['id', 'name'],
include: [{
model: Association,
attributes: [],
}],
where: {
$or: [
{ name: 'test' },
Sequelize.literal('association.name = \'test\''),
],
},
});
Is there a better way?
This feature is described in the docs: Top level where with eagerly loaded models.
Model.findAll({
attributes: ['id', 'name'],
include: [{
model: Association,
attributes: [],
}],
where: {
$or: [
{ name: 'test' },
{ '$association.name$': 'test' },
],
},
});
So I've been at this for awhile and can't see how my code is different from the documentation.
I've also checked out this question, this question, this question, and this unanswered different question.
For my admin panel I'm trying to query to get all the information associated with a user and display a 'master' user profile to the admin.
My User model looks like this:
module.exports = {
autoPK: true,
attributes : {
id: {
type: 'integer',
primaryKey: true,
unique: true
},
email : {
type : 'email',
unique : true,
required : true,
},
password : {
type : 'string',
minLength : 8,
required : true
},
admin:{
type: 'bool'
},
user_profile:{
collection: 'userprofile',
via: 'user_id',
},
properties: {
collection: 'subjectproperties',
via: 'user_id'
},
employment_info: {
collection: 'employmentinfo',
via: 'user_id'
},
file_uploads: {
collection: 'fileupload',
via: 'user_id'
},
nearest_living_relatives:{
collection: 'nearestlivingrelative',
via: 'user_id'
},
mortgage_info: {
collection: 'mortgageinfo',
via: 'user_id'
},
user_progression_state:{
collection: 'userprogressionstate',
via: 'user_id'
},
users_applied_loan_values:{
collection: 'usersappliedloanvalues',
via: 'user_id'
}
}
}
I don't want to list out all the belongs to user models cause there are a lot of them, but here is one of the simpler one's.
EmploymentInfo.js
module.exports = {
tableName: "employment_info",
attributes : {
employers_name:{
type: 'string',
required: true
},
employers_address:{
type: 'string',
required: true
},
employers_city:{
type: 'string',
required: true
},
employers_state:{
type: 'string',
required: true
},
employers_zip:{
type: 'string',
required: true
},
job_position:{
type: 'string',
required: true
},
years_in_position:{
type: 'string',
required: true
},
years_in_industry:{
type: 'integer',
required: true
},
user_id:{
model:'user'
}
}
};
And as for my controller:
create_admin_user_profile: function(req, res){
var user_id = req.query.userId;
User.find({'id': user_id}).populateAll().exec(function(err, user){
if(err || user.length === 0){
sails.log.verbose(err);
}else{
sails.log.verbose(user);
}
});
},
It doesn't error out but all I see in the terminal is this for the above:
[ { user_profile: [],
properties: [],
employment_info: [],
file_uploads: [],
nearest_living_relatives: [],
mortgage_info: [],
user_progression_state: [],
users_applied_loan_values: [],
id: 5,
email: 'test#test.com',
admin: 1 } ]
Even though there is an entry in all of those tables for that user.
If I change the line:
User.find({'id': user_id}).populateAll().exec(function(err, user){
To:
User.find({'id': user_id}).populate('employment_info').exec(function(err, user){
Same but shorter result:
[ { employment_info: [],
id: 5,
email: 'test#test.com',
admin: 1 } ]
I've tried changing the case, I've tried adding columnName to the user_id attribute, I've tried changing the column name across the entire breadth of the project to not have an under_score in it, though that never seemed to be issue in it picking up the names correctly, but nothing I've done seems to work. I've also tried uninstalling sails, and the sails-mysql adapter and clearing my npm cache.
At this point my just stuck, I really can't see a reason why it's not working.
As for project info:
Sails v: 0.12.11
npm v: 3.10.9
node v: 7.2.0
Additional info asked for in comments:
SQL row taken right from db for user 5
employers_name, employers_address, employers_city, employers_state, employers_zip, job_position, years_in_position, years_in_industry, user_id
'Company', 'Mill Steet', 'SLC', 'Utah', '88888', 'Developer', '2', '2', '5'
And json format returned by find method in EmploymentInfo.js controller
{
"employmentInfo": {
"employers_name": "Company",
"employers_address": "Mill Steet",
"employers_city": "SLC",
"employers_state": "Utah",
"employers_zip": "88888",
"job_position": "Developer",
"years_in_position": "2",
"years_in_industry": 2,
"user": 5
}
}
The reason the last param is user and not user_id is because I rename it in the find method to serve the front-end mvc which also has the ability to work with associations. It's also why the JSON has the format it does.
Code from the find method that replaces user_id:
EmploymentInfo.find({'user_id': user_id}).exec(function(err, profile){
if(err || !profile.length){
return res.json(err);
}else{
res.status(200);
profile[0].user = profile[0].user_id;
delete profile[0].user_id;
res.send({'employmentInfo': profile[0]});
}
});
However I've tried not renaming it; I've also tried getting rid of my find override and just relying on the blueprint find method, neither of those worked either.