I have an array of elements, the length changes but its always divisable by 8 (8,16,24,32,40,48..etc).
I am trying to slice off the first 8 elements, return them.
Then slice off the next 8 elements and return them in reverse.
And repeat until the array is empty (RTL then LTR then RTL..etc).
I am unsure how to iterate and keep track.
const print = (value) => document.write(value);
rtl = true
elements = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]
const sliceArr = (arr, cnt) => {
arr = arr.slice(0,cnt)
if(rtl) return arr
else {
rtl = !rtl; // toggle rtl
}
}
tmpArray = []
tmpArray = sliceArr(elements, 8)
print(tmpArray)
Desired output
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
16,15,14,13,12,11,10,9
17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks!
You can use Array.from() to create a new array with a length of Math.ceil(elements.length / 8). In the callback, get the current index, and get the slice from the elements array. If i % 2 is 0 return the slice, but if it's an odd index, return the reverse of the slice:
const elements = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]
const result = Array.from({ length: Math.ceil(elements.length / 8) }, (_, i) => {
const arr = elements.slice(i * 8, (i + 1) * 8)
return i % 2 ? arr.reverse() : arr
})
console.log(result.join('\n'))
You could slice the array and check the direction.
const slice = (array, size, direction) => {
var result = [],
i = 0,
temp;
while (i < array.length) {
var temp = array.slice(i, i +=size);
if (direction) temp.reverse();
direction = !direction;
result.push(temp);
}
return result;
}
slice([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24], 8, false).map(a => console.log(...a));
Related
One of the challanging question I got in office, which i could not able to come out of it. need the help here.
const array = [2, 7, 11, 15], target = 9;
in the above i have an array and target as 9, as well this target can change any of value as 18,26 like so. the result should show the indexOf array which used for get the target. for example at present it is 9, so the result should be [0,1] (2+7). if the target is 26 then result should be [2,3]. how to achieve this?
for my try the first attempt is working. but rest of them not. need the help.
my code :
const array = [2, 7, 11, 15], target = 9;
const result = [];
const outPut = array.reduce((c,v,i,a) => {
if(c !== target && c < target) {
result.push(a.indexOf(v));
}
return c + v;
}, 0);
console(result);
Here's the brute force solution:
Get all the subsets of the array.
Compute the sum of each subset.
Filter the subsets to those whose sum is the target.
const array = [1, 2, 7, 8, 9, -2];
const target = 9;
const getAllSubsets = array => array.reduce(
(subsets, value) => subsets.concat(subsets.map(set => [...set, value])),
[[]]
);
const subsets = getAllSubsets(array);
const result = subsets.filter(
subset => subset.reduce((partialSum, element) => partialSum + element, 0) == target
);
console.log(result);
This example produces all the subsets of [1, 2, 7, 8, 9, -2] that sum to 9.
Output:
[ [ 2, 7 ], [ 1, 8 ], [ 9 ], [ 1, 2, 8, -2 ], [ 2, 9, -2 ] ]
You only need to make two small changes to make this work with indices instead of the actual values:
get all subsets of array.map((_, i) => i) instead of array to get the indices
sum using array[element] instead of element.
const array = [1, 2, 7, 8, 9, -2];
const target = 9;
const getAllSubsets = array => array.reduce(
(subsets, value) => subsets.concat(subsets.map(set => [...set, value])),
[[]]
);
const subsets = getAllSubsets(array.map((_, i) => i));
const result = subsets.filter(
subset => subset.reduce((partialSum, element) => partialSum + array[element], 0) == target
);
console.log(result);
The problem with this approach is that you might end up adding the wrong elements; for example, if target was 13, your code would first add 2 and 7 and then not return the correct result because it wouldn't then consider adding 11 since that exceeds the target. Instead, you should use a two-pointer technique (see https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/two-pointers-technique/)
const array = [2, 7, 11, 15];
let result = [];
const getResult = (target) => {
for(let i =0; i < array.length;i++){
let requiredValue = target - array[i];
if(array.indexOf(requiredValue) > -1) {
result = [array.indexOf(array[i]), array.indexOf(requiredValue)].sort();
}
if(array.indexOf(requiredValue) < -1) {
result = [0];
}
}
}
getResult(9)
console.log(result);
getResult(18)
console.log(result);
getResult(26)
console.log(result);
Here is my solution:
const array = [2, 7, 11, 15];
const target = 26;
let result = [];
for(let i =0; i < array.length;i++){
let requiredValue = target - array[i];
if(array.indexOf(requiredValue) > -1) {
result = [array.indexOf(array[i]), array.indexOf(requiredValue)].sort();
}
}
console.log(result);
it works for me. any one find the issue, pls comment. Change the target and play.
I'm trying to create a function that groups an array of numbers based on a length parameter. The length represents the max length of each sub-array. The code works as it is meant to for getting the sub arrays, but what I'd like to do is make it sort by odd and even.
function myFunctionA(myArr1, myVal) {
newArr = [];
for ( x = 0; x < myArr1.length; x += myVal) {
newArr.push(myArr1.slice(x, x + myVal));
}
return newArr;
}
Console.log(myfunction([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10],3))
This returns [[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9],[10]]
What I'd like to do is go through each sub array at a time until the sub arrays are the correct length and add any leftover values to a sub array/s
This would look like
[[1,3,5][2,4,6][7,9][8,10]]
Since arr 0 and arr 1 are the correct length that we have stated in the console.log statement, 7 8 9 and 10 are left over. But since the can't create a full sub array and they are odds and even, they form two sub arrays with a side of 2.
Other examples:
myfunction([1,2,3,4,5,6,7],2)
Should return [[1,3],[2,4],[5,7],[6]]
myfunction([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8],1)
Should return [[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]]
You could take an array for collecting all odd and even values and then push the group if it has zero items. By having the wanted size, create a new array.
function chunkenator(array, size, fn) {
let groups = [],
result = [];
for (let value of array) {
const group = fn(value);
if (!groups[group]) groups[group] = [];
if (!groups[group].length) result.push(groups[group]);
groups[group].push(value);
if (groups[group].length === size) groups[group] = [];
}
return result;
}
console.log(chunkenator([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], 3, x => x % 2));
console.log(chunkenator([1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15], 3, x => x % 2));
One possibility would be to first seperate the numbers into even and odd numbers and then just loop over it, pushing the numbers into a new array switching between even and odd numbers.
It's not the cleanest piece of code, but it works.
function myfunction(arr, n) {
const evenOdd = arr.reduce((acc, e) => {
const ind = +(e % 2 === 0);
acc[ind] = acc[ind] || [];
acc[ind].push(e);
return acc;
}, []);
let ind = 0, res = [[]];
while (evenOdd[0].length || evenOdd[1].length) {
for (let i = n; i--;) {
const val = evenOdd[ind].shift();
if (val) res[res.length - 1].push(val)
}
ind = (ind + 1) % 2
res.push([])
}
res.pop()
return res;
}
for (const n of [1, 2, 3]) {
console.log(n,
myfunction([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], n)
)
}
I've a JavaScript array and sum as input
array = [4,8,2,4,2,2,8,12,4,2, 2]
sum = 12 // all the time sum will be 12
I want 2d array, the numbers in batches should be sum equals or less than 12
The output array should look like
[
[4,8],
[2,4,2,2,2],
[8, 4],
[12],
[2]
]
4 + 8 = 12
2 + 4 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 12
...
2 is left at the end
Other examples
1) array = [6,5,3,3,3,2,2,2,2]
sum = 12
output: [ [6,3,3], [5,3,2,2], [2,2] ]
One the number is allotted to subset, it should not used to other subset
remaining numbers can be added to the last but sum should be less than 12, else add one more array and add remaining ones
The input array can have any integer from 1 - 12
How can I get the output I want?
Try this function. I commented the code as much as possible to clarify it.
const example1 = [4, 8, 2, 4, 2, 2, 8, 12, 4, 2, 2];
const example2 = [6, 5, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2];
const example3 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12];
const example4 = [5,12,3,4,4,1,1,1,5,8,12,6,9,11,6];
const example5 = [4, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9];
const lookAhead = function(array, searchFor) {
return array.some(val => {
return val <= searchFor;
});
}
function findPairs(inputArray) {
// First sort array in descending order
inputArray.sort((a, b) => b - a);
console.log("input", JSON.stringify(inputArray.slice(0)));
// set variables
const pairArray = [];
const max = 12;
inputArray.forEach(function(num, index) {
// when looping the array we will replace values with null once completed,
// Therefore if value is null no need to go futher
if (num == null)
return;
// initiate pair value with current number
const pair = [num];
// set it to null in input array
inputArray[index] = null;
// if number equals to max (ie. 12) no need to go futher
if (num == max) {
pairArray.push(pair);
return;
}
let total = num;
// Loop through array again to see matching numbers
for (let i = 0; i < inputArray.length; i++) {
// Don't go futher if it is a null value
if (inputArray[i] == null)
continue;
const add = total + inputArray[i];
/* if the total is less than max (12) then we check if we have an edge case
* For example in an array like [6, 5, 3, 3, 3], 6 + 5 is 11 but in next loops we
* will not find any "1" to get to 12. Therefore we escape this iteration and check
* next numbers. In this case the result would be 6 + 3 + 3
*/
if (add < max) {
const found = lookAhead(inputArray.slice(i), max - add);
if (found) {
pair.push(inputArray[i]);
total = add;
inputArray[i] = null;
}
} else if (add == max) {
// The addition is equals to max. Push the number and set it to null in input array
pair.push(inputArray[i]);
inputArray[i] = null;
total = 0;
break;
}
}
// Push pair array from this iteration to pairArray
pairArray.push(pair);
});
console.log("output", JSON.stringify(pairArray));
console.log("-------");
}
findPairs(example1);
findPairs(example2);
findPairs(example3);
findPairs(example4);
findPairs(example5);
A little complex to understand but here you go...
let originalArray = [7, 7, 7, 7, 7]
let sum = 12;
let twoDiArray = [];
let CalculateSum = (array, element) => {
array = [...array, element]
return array.reduce((x, y) => {
return x + y;
})
}
twoDiArray.push([]);
originalArray.forEach(element => {
for (let i = 0; i < twoDiArray.length; i++) {
if (CalculateSum(twoDiArray[i], element) <= 12) {
twoDiArray[i].push(element);
break;
} else {
if (twoDiArray.length - 1 === i) {
twoDiArray.push([element]);
break;
}
}
}
})
console.log(twoDiArray)
Here you... I will keep both answers open for future use of others...
let originalArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]
let sum = 12;
let twoDiArray = [];
let CalculateSum = (array, element) => {
array = [...array, element]
return array.reduce((x, y) => {
return x + y;
})
}
twoDiArray.push([originalArray[0]]);
originalArray.splice(0, 1);
do {
originalArray.forEach((element, index) => {
for (let i = 0; i < twoDiArray.length; i++) {
let summ = CalculateSum(twoDiArray[i], element);
if (summ === 12) {
twoDiArray[i].push(element);
originalArray.splice(index, 1);
break;
} else {
if (index === originalArray.length - 1) {
if (CalculateSum(twoDiArray[twoDiArray.length - 1], originalArray[0]) <= 12) {
twoDiArray[twoDiArray.length - 1].push(originalArray[0]);
break;
} else {
twoDiArray.push([originalArray[0]]);
}
originalArray.splice(0, 1);
}
}
}
})
}
while (originalArray.length > 0);
console.log(twoDiArray)
I need to find elements in an array of numbers where arr[i] === i, meaning the element must be equal to the array index.
They must be found with using recursion, not just by cycle.
I would be very thankful, if someone help, because I've spent many hours and can't do anything.
I've tried to use Binary Search but it doesn't work. In the end I've got only the empty array.
function fixedPointSearch(arr, low, high) {
let middle = Math.floor((high - low) / 2);
console.log( low, high, middle )
let arrRes = [];
if (arr[middle] === middle)
{ arrRes.push(arr[middle]); }
else if (arr[middle] > middle)
{ fixedPointSearch(arr, middle + 1, high); }
else
{ fixedPointSearch(arr, low, middle - 1); }
return arrRes;
}
const arr1 = [-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17];
console.log(fixedPointSearch(arr1, 0, arr1.length - 1));
To do this recursively, you presumably want to recurse on smaller and smaller arrays, but that means you need to also update the index you're checking on each call. One of the simplest ways to do this is just to include an index in the parameters to your function and increment it on each recursive call. This is one way to do so:
const fixedPointSearch = ([x, ...xs] = [], index = 0) =>
x == undefined
? []
: [... (x === index ? [x] : []), ... fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1)]
console .log (
fixedPointSearch([-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17])
)
It's debatable whether that version or the following one is easier to read, but they are doing essentially the same thing:
const fixedPointSearch = ([x, ...xs] = [], index = 0) =>
x == undefined
? []
: x === index
? [x, ... fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1)]
: // else
fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1)
There is a potential problem, though. Running this over a large array, we could hit the recursion depth limit. If the function were tail-recursive, that problem would simply vanish when JS engines perform tail-call optimization. We don't know when that will be, of course, or even it it will actually ever happen, even though it's been specified for five years. But it sometimes makes sense to write to take advantage of it, on the hope that it will one day become a reality, especially since these will still work as well as the non-tail-call version.
So a tail-recursive version might look like this:
const fixedPointSearch = ([x, ...xs] = [], index = 0, res = []) =>
x == undefined
? res
: fixedPointSearch (xs, index + 1, x === index ? [...res, x] : res)
You can solve this w/o additional temporary arrays and parameters, by simply shortening the array in each step:
const myArray = [0, 5, 2, 4, 7, 9, 6];
function fixedPointSearch(arrayToTest) {
if (arrayToTest.length === 0) {
return [];
}
const lastIndex = arrayToTest.length - 1;
const lastItem = arrayToTest[lastIndex];
const remainingItems = arrayToTest.slice(0, lastIndex);
return lastItem === lastIndex
? [...fixedPointSearch(remainingItems), lastItem]
: fixedPointSearch(remainingItems);
}
console.log(fixedPointSearch(myArray));
If you want to find all the elements you should start from the beginning of the array, not the middle and loop through all the indexes.
The idea is for the recursion is to define the end condition.
Then you check if arr[i] === i to update the results array.
Then you make the recursive call with the index incremented and with the updated results array.
function fixedPointSearch(arr, i, results) {
// End condition of the recursion
if (i === arr.length - 1 || arr.length === 0) {
return results;
}
if (arr[i] === i) {
results.push(i);
}
// Recursive call
return fixedPointSearch(arr, i + 1, results);
}
const arr1 = [-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17];
console.log(fixedPointSearch(arr1, 0, []));
console.log(fixedPointSearch([], 0, []));
console.log(fixedPointSearch([9, 8, 7], 0, []));
The idiomatic solution in JavaScript uses Array.prototype.filter -
const run = (a = []) =>
a.filter((x, i) => x === i)
console.log(run([ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ])) // [0,1,2,3,4,5]
console.log(run([ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 ])) // [3]
console.log(run([ 7, 1, 7, 3, 7, 5 ])) // [1,3,5]
console.log(run([ 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 ])) // []
Above it should be clear that recursion isn't required for the job. But there's nothing stopping you from using it, if you wish -
const filter = (test = identity, a = [], i = 0) =>
{ /* base */
if (i >= a.length)
return []
/* inductive: i is in bounds */
if (test(a[i], i))
return [ a[i], ...filter(test, a, i + 1) ]
/* inductive: i is in bounds, a[i] does not pass test */
else
return filter(test, a, i + 1)
}
const run = (a = []) =>
filter((x, i) => x === i, a)
console.log(run([ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ])) // [0,1,2,3,4,5]
console.log(run([ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 ])) // [3]
console.log(run([ 7, 1, 7, 3, 7, 5 ])) // [1,3,5]
console.log(run([ 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 ])) // []
For recursion, you'll need an end condition. Something like
const findElementValueIsPositionInarray = arr => {
let results = [];
const find = i => {
if (arr.length) { // as long as arr has values
const value = arr.shift(); // get value
results = i === value // check it
? results.concat(value)
: results;
return find(i+1); // redo with incremented value of i
}
return results;
};
return find(0);
}
console.log(findElementValueIsPositionInarray([2,3,4,3,9,8]).join());
console.log(findElementValueIsPositionInarray([2,3,4,91,9,8]).join());
console.log(findElementValueIsPositionInarray([0,1,2,87,0,5]).join());
.as-console-wrapper { top: 0; max-height: 100% !important; }
I don't know why you want it through recursion:-
But anyway following should help you:-
let ans = [];
function find(arr,index,ans)
{
if(index==arr.length-1)
{
if(arr[index]==index){
ans.push(arr[index])
}
return;
}
if(arr[index]==index){
ans.push(arr[index])
}
find(arr,index+1,ans);
}
const arr1 = [-10, -3, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17];
find(arr1,0,ans);
console.log(ans);
I have an array
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14];
I want to group it into a set of n arrays such that first n elements in result[0] next n elements in result[1] and if any element is remaining it is discarded.
let sampleOutput = [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]] for n = 7;
Here is my code:
function group5(arr, len) {
let result = [];
let loop=parseInt(arr.length/len)
for (let i=0; i<arr.length; i+=len) {
let x = []; let limitReached = false;
for (let j=0; j<len; j++) {
if (arr[i+j]) {
x.push(arr[i+j]);
} else {
limitReached = true;
break;
}
}
if (!limitReached) {
result.push(x);
} else {
break;
}
}
return result;
}
But I am unable to get expected result. I have tried following things.
Map function
Running i loop to arr.len
Checking arr.len % 7
Creating an array for every third element.
This question is not duplicate of Split array into chunks because I have to discard extra elements that can not be grouped into sets of n.
I have to keep the original array Immutable because I am using this on props in a child component. I need a function that does not modify the original array.
It's pretty straigthforward using Array.from
const list = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14];
function chunkMaxLength(arr, chunkSize, maxLength) {
return Array.from({length: maxLength}, () => arr.splice(0,chunkSize));
}
console.log(chunkMaxLength(list, 7, 2));
What about :
function group5(arr, len) {
let chunks = [];
let copy = arr.splice(); // Use a copy to not modifiy the original array
while(copy.length > len) {
chunks.push(copy.splice(0, len));
}
return chunks;
}
You could use a combination of reduce and filter to achieve the expected result. This example gives you a third control over length which makes the code a bit more reuseable.
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14];
const groupNumber = 7;
const groupCount = 2;
const groupArray = (group, size, length) => group.reduce((accumulator, current, index, original) =>
((index % size) == 0)
? accumulator.concat([original.slice(index, index + size)])
: accumulator, []
).filter((single, index) => index < length)
const test = groupArray(arr, groupNumber, groupCount);
console.log(test);
Step by Step
const groupArray = (group, size, length) => {
// if (index modulus size) equals 0 then concat a group of
// length 'size' as a new entry to the accumulator array and
// return it, else return the accumulator
const reducerFunc = (accumulator, current, index, original) =>
((index % size) == 0)
? accumulator.concat([original.slice(index, index + size)])
: accumulator
// if the current index is greater than the supplied length filter it out
const filterFunc = (single, index) => index < length;
// reduce and filter original group
const result = group.reduce(reducerFunc, []).filter(filterFunc)
return result;
}
Also (apart from the existing approaches) you can have a recursive approach like this
function chunks(a, size, r = [], i = 0) {
let e = i + size;
return e <= a.length ? chunks(a, size, [...r, a.slice(i, e)], e) : r;
}
function chunks(a, size, r = [], i = 0) {
let e = i + size;
return e <= a.length ? chunks(a, size, [...r, a.slice(i, e)], e) : r;
}
var arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14];
console.log('Chunk with 3: ', chunks(arr, 3));
console.log('Chunk with 4: ', chunks(arr, 4));
console.log('Chunk with 5: ', chunks(arr, 5));
console.log('Chunk with 6: ', chunks(arr, 6));
console.log('Chunk with 7: ', chunks(arr, 7));
I able to solve the problem with this code
function groupN(n, arr) {
const res = [];
let limit = 0;
while (limit+n <= arr.length) {
res.push(arr.slice(limit, n + limit));
limit += n
}
return res
}
I usually prefer declarative solutions (map, reduce, etc), but in this case I think a for is more understandable:
function groupArray(array, num) {
const group = [];
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i += num) {
group.push(array.slice(i, i + num));
}
return group;
}