Related
Have the function ArrayChallenge(arr) take the array of integers stored in arr, and determine if any two numbers (excluding the first element) in the array can sum up to the first element in the array. For example: if arr is [7, 3, 5, 2, -4, 8, 11], then there are actually two pairs that sum to the number 7: [5, 2] and [-4, 11]. Your program should return all pairs, with the numbers separated by a comma, in the order the first number appears in the array. Pairs should be separated by a space. So for the example above, your program would return: 5,2 -4,11
If there are no two numbers that sum to the first element in the array, return -1
Input: [17, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 4, -3, -5, 3, 15, 2, 7]
Output: 6,11 10,7 15,2
Final Output: --6--,--1----1-- --1--0,7 --1----5--,2
Input: [7, 6, 4, 1, 7, -2, 3, 12]
Output: 6,1 4,3
Final Output: --6--,--1-- 4,3
My approach
function ArrayChallenge(arr) {
var sum = []
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
for (var j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++){
if(arr.[i] + arr[j]=== )
}
}
// code goes here
return arr;
}
// keep this function call here
console.log(ArrayChallenge(readline()));
Can you please help me with this ?
Logic
Loop through the array.
Start from index 1 to last node (except index 0) in the outer loop.
Srart from one node next to the outer loop in the inner loop.
Check the sum of both nodes.
If the sum value is same as the node at first index, push that to sum array in required format.
Check the length of sum array. If length > 0 the join sum array and return. Else return -1
Working Code
const input = [17, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 4, -3, -5, 3, 15, 2, 7];
const input2 = [7, 6, 4, 1, 7, -2, 3, 12];
const input3 = [37, 6, 4, 1, 7, -2, 3, 12];
function ArrayChallenge(arr) {
var sum = []
for (var i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (var j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[i] + arr[j] === arr[0]) {
sum.push([arr[i], arr[j]].join());
}
}
}
return sum.length > 0 ? sum.join(" ") : -1;
}
console.log(ArrayChallenge(input));
console.log(ArrayChallenge(input2));
console.log(ArrayChallenge(input3));
Your approach uses a O(n^2) level complexity. This can be solved using O(n) if you're willing so sacrifice a little on space complexity.
What you can do is :
Make an empty object.
store all values of the array (not the 0th element) in the object as key and add it's value as true.
Loop the array (from 1st index). Take the value and subtract it from the 0th element. find this subtracted value from the object, If it does not return undefined, make a pair and save it.
One drawback of this method is, you'll find duplicate entries in the result.
This Approach uses O(n) Time complexity and O(n) space complexity
function ArrayChallange(arr) {
let numObj = {}
let i = 1
let result = []
let tempVal
// Pushing all elements of arr (from index 1) inside numObj
while(i<arr.length){
numObj[arr[i]] = true
}
i = 1
// Looping the array to find pairs
while(i < arr.length){
tempVal = numObj[Math.abs(arr[0] - arr[i])]
if(tempVal){
result.push(arr[i].toString() +","+tempVal.toString())
}
}
if(result.length !== 0)
return result.join(" ")
else
return -1
}
You could use a reducer followed by a forEach loop in order to push the pairs to an empty array, then join them at the end.
const ArrayChallenge = (nums) => {
const pairs = []
// Get the first and remove it from the array
const first = nums.splice(0, 1)[0]
nums.reduce((all, curr) => {
all.forEach((a) => {
// Check if we have a match
if (curr + a === first) {
// check if it's already in the array
// we don't want duplicates
if (pairs.indexOf(`${a},${curr}`) === -1 && pairs.indexOf(`${curr},${a}`) === -1) {
// push the pair to the array separated by a space
pairs.push(`${curr},${a}`)
}
}
})
return all
}, nums) // we pass in nums as the starting point
// If there are no pairs then return -1
if (pairs.length === 0) {
return -1
} else {
// Join the pairs together with a space
const result = pairs.join(' ')
// Replace each digit (\d) with hyphens before and after
const parsed = result.replace(/(\d)/g, '--$1--')
return parsed
}
}
const result1 = ArrayChallenge([17, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 4, -3, -5, 3, 15, 2, 7])
console.log(result1)
const result2 = ArrayChallenge([7, 6, 4, 1, 7, -2, 3, 12])
console.log(result2)
I have this nested array
let thirarray = [
[2, 3, 4],
[5, 6, 7, 8],
[9, 10],
];
and what I'm trying to do is add the first element of each array so basically add 2+5+9= 16
I know I can access each element like this
//this is how i can access the first element of each array
console.log(thirarray[0][0]);
console.log(thirarray[1][0]);
console.log(thirarray[2][0]);
I know I can access with a nested loop all the elements like this
let suminsidearrays = 0;
for (i = 0; i < thirarray.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < thirarray[i].length; j++) {
console.log(thirarray[i][j]);
suminsidearrays += thirarray[i][j];
console.log(suminsidearrays);
}
}
So my question is how can add the first element of each array?
simplest way to do it
let thirarray = [[2, 3, 4],[5, 6, 7, 8],[9, 10]];
var res=0
thirarray.forEach(a=>res+=a[0])
console.log(res)
This will sum the first element in each array inside the main array.
const array = [[2, 3, 4],[5, 6, 7, 8],[9, 10]]
let sum = array.reduce((a,c)=>a+c[0],0)
console.log(sum)
Update for new pattern requirement in the comment.
const array = [[2, 3, 4],[5, 6, 7, 8],[9, 10, 11]]
let i = 0, sum = array.reduce((a,c)=>a+c[i++],0)
console.log(sum)
I just want to add that I was able to solve it using what I learned from #holydragon.
So this is what I did
let fourthrarray = [
[20, 30, 40],
[50, 60, 70, 80],
[90, 100, 110, 120, 130],
];
let nextindexposition = 0;
let nextto = 0;
let sumeelsegundo = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < fourthrarray.length; i++) {
//this will allow me to see the 1st index position from each array
//i should expect to see 20,50,90
sumeelsegundo = fourthrarray[i][0];
//this will add the first index position of each array expected output will be 160
sumeelsegundo += fourthrarray[i][0];
console.log(sumeelsegundo);
//in order to add the next index position from each array i used two variable
//one that will store the result and the other one that will increase the index
//position by one on every iteration. this one will allow me to see the elements
//that will be added. expected elements will be 20,60,110
nextto = fourthrarray[i][nextindexposition++];
//this will be adding the elements expected output expected output 190
nextto += fourthrarray[i][nextindexposition++];
console.log(nextto);
}
Just to clarify something this solution works for adding numbers, If I wanted to multiply I just had to change the starting value on the variable nextto from 0 to 1.
I need to find the union of three arrays that get passed to the function union.
It took me about 50lines to code to get the expected result. Apparently, the following code works but now I wonder what are the best ways (either in a functional and in a non-functional fashion) to do the same job.
function union(...arrays) {
var array1 = arguments[0];
var array2 = arguments[1];
var array3 = arguments[2];
var unique = [];
var intersaction = [];
// find the unique values
for(let i = 0; i < array1.length; i++) {
if( (array2.includes(array1[i]) == false) && (array3.includes(array1[i])) == false ) {
unique.push(array1[i]);
}
}
for(let i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
if( (array1.includes(array2[i]) == false) && (array3.includes(array2[i])) == false ) {
unique.push(array2[i]);
}
}
for(let i = 0; i < array3.length; i++) {
if( (array1.includes(array3[i]) == false) && (array2.includes(array3[i])) == false ) {
unique.push(array3[i]);
}
}
// find the intersection
for(let j = 0; j < array1.length; j++) {
if(array2.includes(array1[j]) || array3.includes(array1[j]) ) {
if (intersaction.indexOf(array1[j]) == -1) {
intersaction.push(array1[j]);
}
}
}
for(let j = 0; j < array2.length; j++) {
if(array1.includes(array2[j]) || array3.includes(array2[j]) ) {
if (intersaction.indexOf(array2[j]) == -1) {
intersaction.push(array2[j]);
}
}
}
for(let j = 0; j < array3.length; j++) {
if(array1.includes(array3[j]) || array2.includes(array3[j]) ) {
if (intersaction.indexOf(array3[j]) == -1) {
intersaction.push(array3[j]);
}
}
}
return union = [...intersaction, ...unique];
}
console.log(union([5, 10, 15], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [100, 15, 10, 1, 5]));
// should log: [5, 10, 15, 88, 1, 7, 100]
Just another solution keeping the original function signature provided by the OP:
function union(...arrays) {
return Array.from(new Set([...arrays].flat()));
}
console.log(union([5, 10, 15], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [100, 15, 10, 1, 5]));
Or, even shorter (but less read friendly):
return [...(new Set([...arrays].flat()))];
Explanation:
Array.from takes an Iterable as an argument, this will create a new array from the original one.
[...arrays] spreads the arrays (argument) into a new, single, one (So it becomes an array of arrays) -> [5, 10, 15], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [100, 15, 10, 1, 5] becomes: [[5, 10, 15], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [100, 15, 10, 1, 5]]
.flat flattens the array, making that an array of values rather than ar array of arrays of values -> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/flat -> [[5, 10, 15], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [100, 15, 10, 1, 5]] becomes [5, 10, 15, 15, 88, 1, 5, 7, 100, 15, 10, 1, 5]
new Set removes duplicates from the array and returns an Iterable https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Set. -> [5, 10, 15, 15, 88, 1, 5, 7, 100, 15, 10, 1, 5] becomes a Set instance (an Iterable) without the duplicates. Array.from then converts the Set (Iterable) to a regular array. Further infos here: How to convert Set to Array?
BEWARE: Array.flat is currently an experimental feature (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/flat). Solution without using flat below:
function union(...arrays) {
return Array.from(new Set([].concat.apply([],[...arrays])));
}
console.log(union([5, 10, 15], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [100, 15, 10, 1, 5]));
Explanation (only differences from above):
Instead of .flat, we apply to Array.concat our original array, so that it will flatten it passing a new array as its this and providing our array as the argument: [].concat.apply([],[...arrays])
Snippet: http://jsfiddle.net/briosheje/y03osape/2/
Snippet without .flat: http://jsfiddle.net/briosheje/y03osape/4/
use set that's very simple,
The Set object lets you store unique values of any type, whether
primitive values or object
var a= [5, 10, 15];
var b=[15, 88, 1, 5, 7];
var c=[100, 15, 10, 1, 5];
var result= [...new Set([...a, ...b,...c])];
console.log(result);
I tried to copy your approach of looping over arrays but in a slightly more efficient manner, using only ES5 safe functions. I'm sure the other answers are more efficient if you can use the features they do.
var a = [1, 2, 3];
var b = [1, 2, 4, 5];
var c = [2, 7, 9];
// takes an array of arrays
function getUnique(input) {
var unique = [];
// loop over each array
input.forEach(function(item) {
// loop over each value
item.forEach(function(value) {
// if it's not already in the unique array,
if (unique.indexOf(value) == -1) {
// add it
unique.push(value);
}
});
});
return unique;
}
// takes an array of arrays
function getIntersection(input) {
// assume all elements in first array are common
var intersection = input.shift();
var remove = [];
// loop over items in first array and attempt to
// disprove commonality
intersection.forEach(function(value) {
// loop over subsequent arrays
for (var i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
var item = input[i];
// if these arrays don't contain the value,
// then it isn't an intersection
if (item.indexOf(value) == -1) {
// add it to an array to be removed
remove.push(value);
// exit this loop
break;
}
}
});
// remove values determined not to be intersections
remove.forEach(function(value) {
intersection.splice(intersection.indexOf(value), 1);
})
return intersection;
}
var test = getUnique([a, b, c]);
console.log(test);
var test2 = getIntersection([a, b, c]);
console.log(test2);
Based on custom forEach and Reduce from previously in the exercise at http://csbin.io/callbacks
function forEach(array, callback) {
for(i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
callback(array[i])
}
}
function reduce(array, callback, initialValue) {
for(let i of array){
initialValue = callback(initialValue, i)
}
return initialValue
}
function union(...arrays) {
return reduce(arrays, (seen, next) => {
forEach(next, (element) => {
if(!seen.includes(element)) seen.push(element);
})
return seen
}, [])
}
Note if you use the in-built reduce function you can remove the empty inital array requirement.
pretty new to Javascript and I've tried this question about 4 times now in a span of about a month and I am still unable to solve it.
So here is the question:
Construct a function intersection that compares input arrays and returns a new array with elements found in all of the inputs. BONUS: Use reduce!
The format is:
function intersection(arrays) {
// Your Code Goes Here
}
Test Case: Should log [15, 5]
console.log('Extensions 3 Test: ' + intersection([5, 10, 15, 20], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7]/*, [1, 10, 15, 5, 20]*/));
My current solution: Works for the case of only have two items to compare, but not for the third one, I could make it so that I would loop through and compare the obtained values with the next array but I don't think I am on the right path... Also, I am not using reduce to implement it... And I am not sure if I am supposed to be using 'arguments.' Any help is appreciated! Thank you so much.
function intersection(arrays) {
array = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++)
array.push(arguments[i]);
var result = [];
for(var i = 0; i < array.length - 1; i++) {
for(var j = 0; j < array[i].length; j++) {
if (array[i+1].includes(array[i][j]))
result.push(array[i][j]);
}
}
return result;
}
Although, as several suggestions said, you could use underscore, lodash, or my personal favorite, Ramda (disclaimer: I'm one of the authors), this function should be straightforward enough that you wouldn't even consider a library for it. Here's a simple version:
const intersection = (xs, ys) => xs.filter(x => ys.indexOf(x) > -1);
intersection([5, 10, 15, 20, 3], [15, 88, 3, 1, 5, 7]); //=> [5, 15, 3]
const intersectAll = (...xss) => xss.reduce(intersection);
intersectAll([5, 10, 15, 20, 3], [15, 88, 3, 1, 5, 7], [1, 10, 15, 5, 20]); //=> [5, 15]
I would think that this is all you need, at least so long as you're worried only about reference/primitive equality and don't need to consider cases where you want to know that {x: 1} and {x: 1} are the same, even though they aren't the same reference. If you do need that, you might look to Ramda's intersection function.
Note that if includes were better supported, I would recommend this version instead, as it reads better:
const intersection = (xs, ys) => xs.filter(x => ys.includes(x));
Also, if you have no need for the binary function, you can make just a variadic version of it by combining the two above:
const intersection = (...xss) => xss.reduce((xs, ys) => xs.filter(x => ys.indexOf(x) > -1));
Maybe someone will finds it useful.
As an argument to the function you can give any number of arrays of any length and the function is compact, I think ;)
const findSimilar = (...arrays) => {
return arrays.reduce((includ, current) =>
Array.from(new Set(includ.filter((a) => current.includes(a))))
);
};
console.log(
findSimilar([5, 10, 15, 20], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [1, 10, 15, 5, 20])
);
And how it works:
Ok, first u take rest parameters(...arrays) as parameter of function, so u have
arrays = [ [5, 10, 15, 20], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [1, 10, 15, 5, 20] ]
then in first iteration of reduce we have
includ = [5, 10, 15, 20] and current = [15, 88, 1, 5, 7]
on this two we use filter, what give us [5,15], i use Set to make shure there is no repetition and make array back (Array.from()), which is passed to the next iteration of reduce as "includ", at the next iteration we have
incude = [5,15] and current = [1, 10, 15, 5, 20] and so on ...
We can even use it like this
let result = [
[5, 10, 15, 20],
[15, 88, 1, 5, 7],
[1, 10, 15, 5, 20]
].reduce((includ, current) =>
Array.from(new Set(includ.filter((a) => current.includes(a))))
);
console.log(result);
Although not solving your problem directly, you can do what you're trying to do using the opensource library underscore.js.
_.intersection([1, 2, 3], [101, 2, 1, 10], [2, 1]);
=> [1, 2]
You may be able to derive inspiration from the way that's been implemented. The above is the function call to their own _.intersection function which is also dependent on other underscore.js functions as you see below:
// Produce an array that contains every item shared between all the
// passed-in arrays.
_.intersection = function(array) {
if (array == null) return [];
var result = [];
var argsLength = arguments.length;
for (var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++) {
var item = array[i];
if (_.contains(result, item)) continue;
for (var j = 1; j < argsLength; j++) {
if (!_.contains(arguments[j], item)) break;
}
if (j === argsLength) result.push(item);
}
return result;
};
Here is a solution using reduce, with the empty array passed in as intersection as the initial value.
Iterate the numbers and check if each one appears in one of the subarrays.
If it doesn't, set the Boolean isPresentInAll to false.
If it does appear in all three and it's not already present in the
intersection array, then push to the intersection array.
function intersection(arrayOfArrays) {
return arrayOfArrays.reduce(function(intersection, subArray) {
subArray.forEach(function(number) {
var isPresentInAll = true;
for (var i = 0; i < arrayOfArrays.length; i++) {
if (arrayOfArrays[i].indexOf(number) === -1) {
isPresentInAll = false;
}
}
if (isPresentInAll === true && intersection.indexOf(number) === -1) {
intersection.push(number);
}
});
return intersection;
}, []);
}
I think i got the right function for you.
(Note: results are not sorted!)
var intersection = function() {
// merge deduped arrays from arguments
var arrays = Array.prototype.reduce.call(arguments, function(carry, array) {
return [].concat(carry, array.filter(function(item, index, origin) {
return origin.indexOf(item) === index;
}));
}, []);
var results = arrays.reduce(function(carry, item, index, arr) {
if(
// just select items, which have more then 1 occurance
arr.filter(function(fItem) {
return fItem === item;
}).length > 1 &&
// ... and which are not already in results
!~carry.indexOf(item)
) {
carry = [].concat(carry,item);
}
return carry;
}, []);
return results;
};
Here's a version that uses 2 reduces.
The first iterates the arrays only once to create a hashmap object to track instance counts, the second to return values where counts match number of arguments
function intersection(){
// convert arguments to array of arrays
var arrays = [].slice.call(arguments);
// create an object that tracks counts of instances and is type specific
// so numbers and strings would not be counted as same
var counts= arrays.reduce(function(a,c){
// iterate sub array and count element instances
c.forEach(function(val){
var propName = typeof val + '|' + val;
// if array value not previously encountered add a new property
a[propName] = a[propName] || {count:0, value: val};
// increment count for that property
a[propName].count++;
});
return a;
},{});
// iterate above object to return array of values where count matches total arrays length
return Object.keys(counts).reduce(function(resArr, propName){
if(counts[propName].count === arrays.length){
resArr.push(counts[propName].value);
}
return resArr;
},[]);
}
console.log(intersection([5, 10, 15, 20], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [1, 10, 15, 5, 20]))
Could use some fine tuning to make sure there are enough arguments and that they are all arrays
Here's what I came up with using vanilla javascript and one call to reduce.
function intersection(){
var arrays = [].slice.call(arguments);
var first = arrays[0];
var rest = arrays.slice(1);
return first.reduce(function(all, item, index){
var push = rest.every(function(subArray){
return subArray.indexOf(item) > -1;
});
if(push){
all.push(item);
}
return all;
},[])
}
console.log(intersection([5, 10, 15, 20], [15, 88, 1, 5, 7], [1, 10, 15, 5, 20]));
function intersection(arrays) {
let common = arrays.reduce(function(accumulator, currentValue) {
return accumulator.filter(function(x){
return currentValue.indexOf(x) > -1;
})
})
return common;
}
To optimize your answer that couldn't work on more than 2 subarrays and didn't use reduce, here's the code that works for however many subarrays you pass in.
function intersection(arr1, arr2, arr3){
let ans = arr1[0]; // ans = [5,10,15,20]
for(let i = 0; i < ans.length; i++){ // i = 0...3
for(let j = 1; j < arr1.length; j++){ // j = 1...2
if(!(arr1[j].includes(ans[i]))){ // if the new subarray doesn't include an element in the ans
ans.splice(i, 1); // delete the element from ans
}
}
}
return ans;
}
const arr1 = [5, 10, 15, 20];
const arr2 = [15, 88, 1, 5, 7];
const arr3 = [1, 10, 15, 5, 20];
console.log(intersection([arr1, arr2, arr3])); // should log: [5, 15]
I would like to know how to compare two or more -- potentially unlimited -- arrays for common values and push these values into a new array efficiently. Below I have a function that will accept unlimited arguments, but I am uncertain if this is a good place to begin. PHP appears to have a method that can do what I want called array_intersect. Does javascript offer something similar?
Note: I have found examples of how this can be done with two or so arrays, but I have not found examples of how such approaches might be applied to an unspecified number of arrays as of yet. Therefore I do not see this as a duplicate question.
To further clarify, the arrays might be filled with anything. Letters, numbers, symbols, words, you name it, it might be there.
var sampleOne = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12];
var sampleTwo = [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18];
function FindDirectRelation() {
for(var i = 0; i < arguments.length; ++i) {
console.log(arguments[i]);
};
};
var directRelation = FindDirectRelation(sampleOne, sampleTwo);
I am still a coding novice, so please ensure that everything is explained in a way that is simple enough for me to understand.
using an existing intersect that works with 2 arrays, we can chain together a common sub-set using the built-in reduce() method on an array of arrays that need intersected:
function intersect(a, b) {
var aa = {};
a.forEach(function(v) { aa[v]=1; });
return b.filter(function(v) { return v in aa; });
}
var r1=[1,2,3],
r2=[1,3,4,5],
r3=[5,1,3];
alert([r1, r2, r3].reduce(intersect)) // shows: 1,3
if you define "intersect" as just being in more than one array (not every), then it's more complex...
Check to make sure the elements in the first array are also in the remaining arrays:
function multi_intersect(a) {
var other_arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
return a . filter(function(elt) {
return other_arrays.every(function(an) {
return an.indexOf(elt) !== -1;
});
});
}
Try using Array.prototype.filter() , Array.prototype.indexOf()
var res = sampleOne.filter(function(val) {return sampleTwo.indexOf(val) !== -1})
var sampleOne = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12];
var sampleTwo = [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18];
var arr = ["a", "b", "c"];
var arr1 = ["c", "d", "e"];
var arr2 = [2, 7];
function samples() {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var res = [];
for (var i = 0, curr, next; i < args.length; i++) {
if (args[i + 1]) {
// set `curr` to array `i`
curr = args[i];
// set `next` to array `i + 1` if it exists
next = args[i + 1]
} else {
// if at last index, set `curr` to `args` : input arrays
// flattened to single array , with element at `i` removed
curr = [].concat.apply([], args.slice(0, args.length - 1));
console.log(curr)
// set next to current index
next = args[i];
};
next = next.filter(function(val) {
return curr.indexOf(val) !== -1
// filter duplicate entries at `res`
&& res.indexOf(val) === -1
});
res = res.concat.apply(res, next);
};
return res
}
var sample = samples(sampleOne, sampleTwo, arr, arr1, arr2);
console.log(sample); // [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, "c", 2]