I'm starting or trying to learn functional programming monads.
So the first is Maybe. I'm trying to convert the code with maybe monad.
function(fieldName, vals, fields) {
var newValue = vals[fieldName];
if (typeof(newValue) == 'undefined') {
var elemFrom = fields[fieldName];
if (elemFrom) {
newValue = fields[fieldName]
}
}
if (typeof (newValue) != 'undefined') {
return newValue
}
}
Here I have a bunch of checks for undefined which i think is good use of monay.
My problem is that I read that you pass value to the maybe monad and map function.
However in my case I replace the value inside the monad.
If I pass null the map method will do nothig since the value is undefined.
I'm not using a framework, i want simple implementation so I can understand it.
Should I add "else" method in the maybe monad class (function).
I have the opposite case "Do something if the value is undefined"
Can you suggest how to solve the issue
Thank you
So the function you posted could be rewritten as
const f = (a, b, c) => b[a] === undefined ? c[a] : b[a];
It isn't clear to me that this needs to be a function at all rather than being inlined wherever you want to use the relevant object properties, but maybe you're partially applying it or something, I'm not judging.
As for Maybe, a (very simple) implementation might look something like this:
class Maybe {
static of (value) {
return new Maybe(value);
}
// Proper solution here should be recursive to handle
// nesting properly, but I'm lazy
static equals (a, b) {
return a.chain(x => x) === b.chain(x => x);
}
constructor(value) {
this._value = value;
}
map (f) {
// Does not distinguish null from undefined, but YMMV. Note
// that if the Maybe value is null or undefined we never touch
// f, that's the null propagation thing.
return this._value == null ? this : new Maybe(f(this._value));
}
chain (f) {
const result = this._value == null ? this : f(this._value);
console.assert(result instanceof Maybe);
return result;
}
}
Now we can test that it obeys the Monad laws:
const a = 3;
const f = x => Maybe.of(x * x);
Maybe.of(a).chain(f) === f(a) // left identity
Maybe.equals(Maybe.of(5).chain(Maybe.of), Maybe.of(5)); // right identity
And that it's a valid Functor
Maybe.equals(Maybe.of(3).map(x => x), Maybe.of(3)); // identity
Maybe.equals( // composition
Maybe.of(3).map(x => x + 2).map(x => x * 3),
Maybe.of(3).map(compose(x => x * 3, x => x + 2))
);
Sweet.
So now, to your function. It would be rewritten as
const f = (a, b, c) => {
return b[a] === undefined ? Maybe.of(c[a]) : Maybe.of(b[a]);
}
Perhaps you see now the reason for my confusion, Maybe isn't really saving you much here. But if I were using Maybe I'd rewrite the whole thing like this:
const or = (a, b) => {
return Maybe.of(a == null ? b : a);
}
And then I would just pass in the property accesses:
const obj1 = { a: 2, c: 3 };
const obj2 = { b: 4 };
const prop = "a"
const result = or(obj1["prop"], obj2["prop"]); // Maybe(2)
Update
Credit to #Bergi in the comments reminding me about Alternative. You could add a method to the Maybe class above like so:
alt (x) {
if (!(x instanceof Maybe)) {
throw new TypeError("Expected a Maybe");
}
return this.chain(x => x) == null ? x : this;
}
// semantics
Maybe.of(null).alt(Maybe.of(3)); // Maybe(3)
Maybe.of(2).alt(Maybe.of(4)); // Maybe(2)
// usage
Maybe.of(obj1[prop]).alt(Maybe.of(obj2[prop]));
Note that this doesn't totally satisfy as an implementation of Alternative (you'd also need a zero/empty method) but you can read here and here for more details. This is probably the best replacement for the function you posted.
I could swear that once upon a time, I came across some code that used some js library (maybe lodash??) to do a "deep" check for whether something is defined.
Example:
someLib.isDefined(anObject.aNestedObject.anotherNestedObject);
(would return true if anotherNestedObject is defined, but would return false (and not throw an exception) if anObject or aNestedObject were undefined.
Did I totally dream that, or is there some well-known function out there that does that?
As I wrote in my comment I don't think that it's possible.
The expression anObject.aNestedObject.anotherNestedObject is evaluated before the someLib.isDefined function is invoked so an exception will be thrown (if anObject or aNestedObject don't exist) before the function had a chance to do anything.
Maybe if you'd pass it as a string: someLib.isDefined("anObject.aNestedObject.anotherNestedObject")
But, it's easy to check that like this:
if (anObject && anObject.aNestedObject && anObject.aNestedObject.anotherNestedObject) {
...
}
Or just implement your own function, it's pretty simple:
function exists(obj: any, keys: string | string[]) {
if (typeof keys === "string") {
keys = keys.split(".");
}
return keys.every(key => {
if (!obj) {
return false;
}
obj = obj[key];
return true;
});
}
(code in playground)
Lodash's has():
_.has(object, path)
Example:
var object = {a: {b: 'test', c: 'test2'}};
_.has(object, 'a.b');
// => true
_.has(object, 'a.d');
// => false
Full documentation
Source code for _.has()
No there is no well-known function to do this, but you can check it safely in this way:
if (typeof anObject != "undefined"
&& typeof anObject.aNestedObject != "undefined"
&& typeof anObject.aNestedObject.anotherNestedObject != "undefined") {
console.log("defined");
}else{
console.log("undefined");
}
This question already has answers here:
Test for existence of nested JavaScript object key
(64 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
a "problem" which i have every now and then is that i have an object e.g. user = {} and through the course of using the app this gets populated. Let's say somwhere, after an AJAX call or something i do this:
user.loc = {
lat: 50,
long: 9
}
At another place i want to check if user.loc.lat exists.
if (user.loc.lat) {
// do something
}
If it does not exists, this will cause an error. If user.loc.lat is undefined, user.loc of course is undefined as well.
"Cannot read property 'lat' of null" - Dev Tools error
That means I need to check it like this:
if (user.loc) {
if (user.loc.lat) {
// do something
}
}
or
if (user.loc && user.loc.lat) {
// do something
}
This isn't really pretty and the bigger my objects are the worse it gets - obviously (imagine 10 levels of nesting).
It kind bums me that if(user.loc.lat) isn't just returning false if user.loc is undefined as well.
What's the ideal way to check situations like this?
You can use an utility function like this:
get = function(obj, key) {
return key.split(".").reduce(function(o, x) {
return (typeof o == "undefined" || o === null) ? o : o[x];
}, obj);
}
Usage:
get(user, 'loc.lat') // 50
get(user, 'loc.foo.bar') // undefined
Or, to check only if a property exists, without getting its value:
has = function(obj, key) {
return key.split(".").every(function(x) {
if(typeof obj != "object" || obj === null || ! x in obj)
return false;
obj = obj[x];
return true;
});
}
if(has(user, 'loc.lat')) ...
You can combine the checks using lazy and:
if(user.loc && user.loc.lat) { ...
Or, you use CoffeeScript. And ES2020 has new syntax ( Nullish coalescing Operator ).
user.loc?.lat?. '...'
which would run the checks for loc property and safeguard against empty objects.
Well, javascript has try-catch. Depending on what you actually need to do (i.e. what your else statement would look like if it's undefined), that may be what you want.
example:
try {
user.loc.lat.doSomething();
} catch(error) {
//report
}
Try this if(user && user.loc && user.loc.lat) {...}
You can check value of null and undefined using typeof
If .loc has value false than you can try
if(user && user.loc && typeof(user.loc)!=="undefined"){...}
If you have a huge nested object than have a look at
Source.
function checkNested(obj /*, level1, level2, ... levelN*/) {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments),
obj = args.shift();
for (var i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
if (!obj.hasOwnProperty(args[i])) {
return false;
}
obj = obj[args[i]];
}
return true;
}
var test = {level1:{level2:{level3:'level3'}} };
checkNested(test, 'level1', 'level2', 'level3'); // true
checkNested(test, 'level1', 'level2', 'foo'); // false
Update:
Try lodash.get
I need to replace imagesrc with the value stored in this object. However when I run:
if(data['results'][res]['entities']['media']["0"]["media_url"]) {
imagesrc = data['results'][res]['entities']['media']["0"]["media_url"];
}
I get the error:
Cannot read property '0' of undefined
How can I run my condition so that I don't get errors if something is undefined?
if (data['results'][res]['entities']['media']["0"] == undefined
|| data['results'][res]['entities']['media']["0"] == null) {
...
}
you can place your code inside a try catch block and examin error message.
You could write a function that walks the object tree and returns undefined as soon as it hits an undefined property:
function safeGetData(obj, names)
{
for (var i = 0; i < names.length; ++i) {
if (typeof obj === "undefined") {
return undefined;
}
obj = obj[names[i]];
}
return obj;
}
You can use it like this:
var imagesrc = safeGetData(data,
["results", res, "entities", "media", "0", "media_url"]);
I’m a fan of using short circuit evaluation for these kinds of situations:
items && items[val] && doSomething(items[val])
Some people might be repulsed by this, but I think it’s a nice and readable way to express something that should only be evaluated if certain conditions are met.
In this case, we’re actually chaining two short circuit evaluations. First, we determine whether items has a defined value. If it undefined, then the rest of the expression is moot, so we won’t even bother to evaluate it. AND if it is defined, then let’s check for the existence of some property that we’re interested in. If it’s undefined, then bail out. AND if it’s true, we can go ahead and evaluate the rest of the expression.
I think it’s a lot easier to reason through at a glance than:
if (items) {
if (items[val]) {
doSomething(items[val])
}
}
Ternary operators work similarly:
items
? items[val]
? doSomething(items[val])
: alert(‘The property “‘ + val + ‘“ has not yet been defined.’)
: alert(‘You have not yet defined any items!’)
It's an old topic, I know. It's just to add my 2 cents.
I'm definitely not a javascript "guru", but here's one of my old attempts. It relies upon a couple of new ecmascript 6 features and it's going to approach the problem in a more "functional" way:
const prop = (...arr) => obj => arr.reduce((acc, v) => acc && acc.hasOwnProperty(v) ? acc[v] : undefined, obj)
And some tests in order to show how it should work:
describe('unit - prop', () => {
const event = {
record: {
sns: {
subject: 'Hello',
message: '<div>Welcome!</div>'
}
}
}
it('property exists', done => {
const value = prop('record', 'sns', 'subject')(event)
expect(value)
.to
.be
.equal('Hello')
done()
})
it('property does not exist', done => {
const value = prop('record', 'bad', 'subject')(event)
expect(value)
.to
.be
.undefined
done()
})
})
Does it make sense?
In PHP you can do if(isset($array['foo'])) { ... }. In JavaScript you often use if(array.foo) { ... } to do the same, but this is not exactly the same statement. The condition will also evaluate to false if array.foo does exists but is false or 0 (and probably other values as well).
What is the perfect equivalent of PHP's isset in JavaScript?
In a broader sense, a general, complete guide on JavaScript's handling of variables that don't exist, variables without a value, etc. would be convenient.
Update: 11 years and 11 months ago I posted this question, and wow, it still gets a lot of activity. Now, I'm pretty sure that when I wrote this, I only wanted to know how to check for the presence of a property in an associative array (a.k.a. dictionary), and as such the correct (for me) answers involve hasOwnProperty or the in operator. I wasn't interested in checking local or global variables.
But while I remember that well, that intent is not quite clear in the question as written, or even directly contradicted by it! I never mentioned the associative array, and PHP's isset does also do those other things. Let this be a lesson to all of us about how important it is to properly state your requirements in a question, and also how global variables, local variables, object properties, dictionary keys and what-have-you aren't Huey, Dewey, and Louie.
In the meantime (heh), many many people have provided answers to that effect as well, so for those of you who found this question through Google, well, I'm glad my vagueness helped in a way I guess. Anyway, just wanted to clarify that.
I generally use the typeof operator:
if (typeof obj.foo !== 'undefined') {
// your code here
}
It will return "undefined" either if the property doesn't exist or its value is undefined.
(See also: Difference between undefined and not being defined.)
There are other ways to figure out if a property exists on an object, like the hasOwnProperty method:
if (obj.hasOwnProperty('foo')) {
// your code here
}
And the in operator:
if ('foo' in obj) {
// your code here
}
The difference between the last two is that the hasOwnProperty method will check if the property exist physically on the object (the property is not inherited).
The in operator will check on all the properties reachable up in the prototype chain, e.g.:
var obj = { foo: 'bar'};
obj.hasOwnProperty('foo'); // true
obj.hasOwnProperty('toString'); // false
'toString' in obj; // true
As you can see, hasOwnProperty returns false and the in operator returns true when checking the toString method, this method is defined up in the prototype chain, because obj inherits form Object.prototype.
Age old thread, but there are new ways to run an equivalent isset().
ESNext (Stage 4 December 2019)
Two new syntax allow us to vastly simplify the use of isset() functionality:
Optional Chaining(?.)
Nullish Coalescing Operator(??)
Please read the docs and mind the browser compatibility.
Answer
See below for explanation. Note I use StandardJS syntax
Example Usage
// IMPORTANT pass a function to our isset() that returns the value we're
// trying to test(ES6 arrow function)
isset(() => some) // false
// Defining objects
let some = { nested: { value: 'hello' } }
// More tests that never throw an error
isset(() => some) // true
isset(() => some.nested) // true
isset(() => some.nested.value) // true
isset(() => some.nested.deeper.value) // false
// Less compact but still viable except when trying to use `this` context
isset(function () { return some.nested.deeper.value }) // false
Answer Function
/**
* Checks to see if a value is set.
*
* #param {Function} accessor Function that returns our value
* #returns {Boolean} Value is not undefined or null
*/
function isset (accessor) {
try {
// Note we're seeing if the returned value of our function is not
// undefined or null
return accessor() !== undefined && accessor() !== null
} catch (e) {
// And we're able to catch the Error it would normally throw for
// referencing a property of undefined
return false
}
}
NPM Package
This answer function is available as the isset-php package on NPM. The package contains a few improvements such as type checking and supporting multiple arguments.
npm install --save isset-php
The full documentation is available in the README.
const isset = require('isset-php')
let val = ''
// This will evaluate to true so the text will be printed.
if (isset(() => val)) {
console.log('This val is set so I will print.')
}
Explanation
PHP
Note that in PHP you can reference any variable at any depth - even trying to
access a non-array as an array will return a simple true or false:
// Referencing an undeclared variable
isset($some); // false
$some = 'hello';
// Declared but has no depth(not an array)
isset($some); // true
isset($some['nested']); // false
$some = ['nested' => 'hello'];
// Declared as an array but not with the depth we're testing for
isset($some['nested']); // true
isset($some['nested']['deeper']); // false
JavaScript
In JavaScript, we don't have that freedom; we'll always get an error if we do
the same because the engine is immediately attempting to access the value of deeper before we can wrap it in our isset() function so...
// Common pitfall answer(ES6 arrow function)
const isset = (ref) => typeof ref !== 'undefined'
// Same as above
function isset (ref) { return typeof ref !== 'undefined' }
// Referencing an undeclared variable will throw an error, so no luck here
isset(some) // Error: some is not defined
// Defining a simple object with no properties - so we aren't defining
// the property `nested`
let some = {}
// Simple checking if we have a declared variable
isset(some) // true
// Now trying to see if we have a top level property, still valid
isset(some.nested) // false
// But here is where things fall apart: trying to access a deep property
// of a complex object; it will throw an error
isset(some.nested.deeper) // Error: Cannot read property 'deeper' of undefined
// ^^^^^^ undefined
More failing alternatives:
// Any way we attempt to access the `deeper` property of `nested` will
// throw an error
some.nested.deeper.hasOwnProperty('value') // Error
// ^^^^^^ undefined
// Similar to the above but safe from objects overriding `hasOwnProperty`
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(some.nested.deeper, 'value') // Error
// ^^^^^^ undefined
// Same goes for typeof
typeof some.nested.deeper !== 'undefined' // Error
// ^^^^^^ undefined
And some working alternatives that can get redundant fast:
// Wrap everything in try...catch
try {
if (isset(some.nested.deeper)) {
// ...
}
} catch (e) {}
try {
if (some.nested.deeper !== undefined && some.nested.deeper !== null) {
// ...
}
} catch (e) {}
// Or by chaining all of the isset which can get long
isset(some) && isset(some.nested) && isset(some.nested.deeper) // false
// ^^^^^^ returns false so the next isset() is never run
Conclusion
All of the other answers - though most are viable...
Assume you're only checking to see if the variable is not undefined which
is fine for some use cases but can still throw an Error
Assume you're only trying to access a top level property, which again is
fine for some use cases
Force you to use a less than ideal approach relative to PHP's isset()
e.g. isset(some, 'nested.deeper.value')
Use eval() which works but I personally avoid
I think I covered a lot of it. There are some points I make in my answer that I
don't touch upon because they - although relevant - are not part of the
question(e.g. short circuiting). If need be, though, I can update my answer with links to some of the
more technical aspects based on demand.
I spent waaay to much time on this so hopefully it helps people out.
Thank-you for reading!
Reference to SOURCE
module.exports = function isset () {
// discuss at: http://locutus.io/php/isset/
// original by: Kevin van Zonneveld (http://kvz.io)
// improved by: FremyCompany
// improved by: Onno Marsman (https://twitter.com/onnomarsman)
// improved by: Rafał Kukawski (http://blog.kukawski.pl)
// example 1: isset( undefined, true)
// returns 1: false
// example 2: isset( 'Kevin van Zonneveld' )
// returns 2: true
var a = arguments
var l = a.length
var i = 0
var undef
if (l === 0) {
throw new Error('Empty isset')
}
while (i !== l) {
if (a[i] === undef || a[i] === null) {
return false
}
i++
}
return true
}
phpjs.org is mostly retired in favor of locutus
Here is the new link http://locutus.io/php/var/isset
if (!('foo' in obj)) {
// not set.
}
//
// tring to reference non-existing variable throws ReferenceError
// before test function is even executed
//
// example, if you do:
//
// if ( isset( someVar ) )
// doStuff( someVar );
//
// you get a ReferenceError ( if there is no someVar... )
// and isset fn doesn't get executed.
//
// if you pass variable name as string, ex. isset( 'novar' );,
// this might work:
//
function isset ( strVariableName ) {
try {
eval( strVariableName );
} catch( err ) {
if ( err instanceof ReferenceError )
return false;
}
return true;
}
//
//
This simple solution works, but not for deep object check.
function isset(str) {
return window[str] !== undefined;
}
I always use this generic function to prevent errrors on primitive variables as well as arrays and objects.
isset = function(obj) {
var i, max_i;
if(obj === undefined) return false;
for (i = 1, max_i = arguments.length; i < max_i; i++) {
if (obj[arguments[i]] === undefined) {
return false;
}
obj = obj[arguments[i]];
}
return true;
};
console.log(isset(obj)); // returns false
var obj = 'huhu';
console.log(isset(obj)); // returns true
obj = {hallo:{hoi:'hoi'}};
console.log(isset(obj, 'niet')); // returns false
console.log(isset(obj, 'hallo')); // returns true
console.log(isset(obj, 'hallo', 'hallo')); // returns false
console.log(isset(obj, 'hallo', 'hoi')); // returns true
This solution worked for me.
function isset(object){
return (typeof object !=='undefined');
}
If you are using underscorejs I always use
if (!_.isUndefined(data) && !_.isNull(data)) {
//your stuff
}
This is a pretty bulletproof solution for testing if a variable exists :
var setOrNot = typeof variable !== typeof undefined ? true : false;
Unfortunately, you cannot simply encapsulate it in a function.
You might think of doing something like this :
function isset(variable) {
return typeof variable !== typeof undefined ? true : false;
}
However, this will produce a reference error if variable variable has not been defined, because you cannot pass along a non-existing variable to a function :
Uncaught ReferenceError: foo is not defined
On the other hand, it does allow you to test whether function parameters are undefined :
var a = '5';
var test = function(x, y) {
console.log(isset(x));
console.log(isset(y));
};
test(a);
// OUTPUT :
// ------------
// TRUE
// FALSE
Even though no value for y is passed along to function test, our isset function works perfectly in this context, because y is known in function test as an undefined value.
window.isset = function(v_var) {
if(typeof(v_var) == 'number'){ if(isNaN(v_var)){ return false; }}
if(typeof(v_var) == 'undefined' || v_var === null){ return false; } else { return true; }
};
plus Tests:
https://gist.github.com/daylik/24acc318b6abdcdd63b46607513ae073
(typeof SOMETHING) !== 'undefined'
It's too long to write when used. But we can't package the typeof keyword into a function, because an error will thrown before the function is called, like this:
function isdef($var) {
return (typeof $var) !== 'undefined';
}
isdef(SOMETHING); ///// thrown error: SOMETHING is not defined
So I figured out a way:
function isdef($type) {
return $type !== 'undefined';
}
isdef(typeof SOMETHING);
It can work both with individual variables (variables that does not exist at all), or object properties (non-existent properties). And only 7 more characters than PHP isset.
function isset(variable) {
try {
return typeof eval(variable) !== 'undefined';
} catch (err) {
return false;
}
}
To check wether html block is existing or not, I'm using this code:
if (typeof($('selector').html()) != 'undefined') {
// $('selector') is existing
// your code here
}
Provide the object path as a string, then you can break this string into a path and resolve hasOwnProperty at each step while overwriting the object itself with each iteration.
If you are coding in ES6 environment, take a look at this stackoverflow Ques.
var a;
a = {
b: {
c: 'e'
}
};
function isset (obj, path) {
var stone;
path = path || '';
if (path.indexOf('[') !== -1) {
throw new Error('Unsupported object path notation.');
}
path = path.split('.');
do {
if (obj === undefined) {
return false;
}
stone = path.shift();
if (!obj.hasOwnProperty(stone)) {
return false;
}
obj = obj[stone];
} while (path.length);
return true;
}
console.log(
isset(a, 'b') == true,
isset(a, 'b.c') == true,
isset(a, 'b.c.d') == false,
isset(a, 'b.c.d.e') == false,
isset(a, 'b.c.d.e.f') == false
);
I use a function that can check variables and objects. very convenient to work with jQuery
function _isset (variable) {
if(typeof(variable) == "undefined" || variable == null)
return false;
else
if(typeof(variable) == "object" && !variable.length)
return false;
else
return true;
};
Try to create function like empty function of PHP in Javascript.
May this helps.
function empty(str){
try{
if(typeof str==="string"){
str=str.trim();
}
return !(str !== undefined && str !== "undefined" && str !== null && str!=="" && str!==0 && str!==false);
}catch(ex){
return true;
}
}
console.log(empty(0))//true
console.log(empty(null))//true
console.log(empty(" "))//true
console.log(empty(""))//true
console.log(empty(undefined))//true
console.log(empty("undefined"))//true
var tmp=1;
console.log(empty(tmp))//false
var tmp="Test";
console.log(empty(tmp))//false
var tmp=" Test ";
console.log(empty(tmp))//false
var tmp={a:1,b:false,c:0};
console.log(empty(tmp.a))//false
console.log(empty(tmp.b))//true
console.log(empty(tmp.c))//true
console.log(empty(tmp.c))//true
console.log(empty(tmp.c.d))//true
finally i solved problem with easy solution :
if (obj && obj.foo && obj.foo='somethings'){
console.log('i,m work without error')
}
PHP Manual say:
isset — Determine if a variable is set and is not NULL
And interface something like this:
bool isset ( mixed $var [, mixed $... ] )
The parameter $var is the variable to be checked. it can have any number of parameter though.
isset() returns TRUE if var exists and has value other than NULL. FALSE otherwise.
Some example:
$foo = 'bar';
var_dump(isset($foo)); -> true
$baz = null;
var_dump(isset($baz)); -> false
var_dump(isset($undefined)); -> false
As this in mind, Apparently, It's not possible to write exact equivalent of php isset() function.
For example when we call like this:
if (isset(some_var)) {
}
function issset() {
// function definition
}
Javascript trigger Uncaught ReferenceError: some_var is not defined at (file_name):line_number.
The important and remarkable thing about this behavior is that when trying to pass non-existent variables to normal functions, an error is triggered.
But in PHP isset() are not actually regular functions but language constructs. That means they're part of the PHP language itself, do not play by the normal rules of functions and can hence get away with not triggering an error for non-existent variables. This is important when trying to figure out whether a variable exists or not. But in javscript, it triggers an error in the first place say function call with non-existent variables.
My point is that we can't write it as equivlent javscript function but we can do something like this
if (typeof some_var !== 'undefined') {
// your code here
}
If you want exact same effect PHP also check varable is not NULL
For example
$baz = null;
var_dump(isset($baz)); -> false
So, we can incorporate this into javascript then it look like this:
if (typeof some_var !== 'undefined' && some_var !== null) {
// your code here
}
It was really a problem for me when I was accessing a deeper property of an object so I made a function which will return the property value if exist otherwise it will return false. You may use it to save your time,
//Object on which we want to test
var foo = {
bar: {
bik: {
baz: 'Hello world'
}
}
};
/*
USE: To get value from the object using it properties supplied (Deeper),
if found it will return the property value if not found then will return false
You can use this function in two ways
WAY - 1:
Passing an object as parameter 1 and array of the properties as parameter 2
EG: getValueFromObject(foo, ['bar', 'bik', 'baz']);
WAY - 2: (This will work only if, your object available in window object)
Passing an STRING as parameter 1(Just similarly how we retrieve value form object using it's properties - difference is only the quote)
EG: getValueFromObject('foo.bar.bik.baz');
*/
function getValueFromObject(object, properties) {
if(typeof(object) == 'string') { //Here we extract our object and it's properties from the string
properties = object.split('.');
object = window[properties[0]];
if(typeof(object) == 'undefined') {
return false;
}
properties.shift();
}
var property = properties[0];
properties.shift();
if(object != null && typeof(object[property]) != 'undefined') {
if(typeof(object[property]) == 'object') {
if(properties.length != 0) {
return getValueFromObject(object[property], properties); //Recursive call to the function
} else {
return object[property];
}
} else {
return object[property];
}
} else {
return false;
}
}
console.log(getValueFromObject('fooo.bar.bik.baz')); //false
console.log(getValueFromObject('foo.bar.bik.baz')); //Hello world
console.log(getValueFromObject('foo')); //false
console.log(getValueFromObject('foo.bar.bik')); //returns an object { baz: 'Hello World' }
console.log(getValueFromObject(foo, ['bar', 'bik'])); //returns an object { baz: 'Hello World' }
console.log(getValueFromObject(foo, ['bar', 'bik', 'baz']));//Hello world
If you want to check if an element exists, just use the following code:
if (object) {
//if isset, return true
} else {
//else return false
}
This is sample:
function switchDiv() {
if (document.querySelector("#divId")) {
document.querySelector("#divId").remove();
} else {
var newDiv = document.createElement("div");
newDiv.id = "divId";
document.querySelector("body").appendChild(newDiv);
}
}
document.querySelector("#btn").addEventListener("click", switchDiv);
#divId {
background: red;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
position: relative;
}
<body>
<button id="btn">Let's Diiiv!</button>
</body>
Be careful in ES6, all the previous solutions doesn't work if you want to check a declaration of a let variable and declare it, if it isn't
example
let myTest = 'text';
if(typeof myTest === "undefined") {
var myTest = 'new text'; // can't be a let because let declare in a scope
}
you will see a error
Uncaught SyntaxError: Identifier 'myTest' has already been declared
The solution was to change it by a var
var myTest = 'text'; // I replace let by a var
if(typeof myTest === "undefined") {
var myTest = 'new text';
}
another solution if you can change a let by a var, you need to remove your var
let myTest = 'text';
if(typeof myTest === "undefined") {
myTest = 'new text'; // I remove the var declaration
}
try {
const value = array.foo.object.value;
// isset true
} catch (err) {
// isset false
}
use this function for arrays or nested array (but not for strings)
if(isset(array,'key1=>key1')){alert('isset');}
https://jsfiddle.net/dazzafact/cgav6psr/
arr={nested:{nested2:{val:'isset'}}}
if(t=isset(arr,'nested=>nested2=>val','=>')){
alert(t)
}
function isset(obj,nested,split) {
var sep=split || '.';
var dub=obj
var isset=false
if(typeof(obj)!="undefined" && typeof(nested)!="undefined"){
var arr=nested.split(sep);
for(var k in arr){
var key=arr[k];
if(typeof(dub[key])=="undefined"){
isset=false;
break;
}
dub=dub[key];
isset=dub
}
}
return isset;
}
isset('user.permissions.saveProject', args);
function isset(string, context) {
try {
var arr = string.split('.');
var checkObj = context || window;
for (var i in arr) {
if (checkObj[arr[i]] === undefined) return false;
checkObj = checkObj[arr[i]];
}
return true;
} catch (e) {
return false;
}
}
if (var) {
// This is the most concise equivalent of Php's isset().
}
javascript isset
let test = {
a: {
b: [0, 1]
}
};
console.log(test.isset('a.b')) // true
console.log(test.isset('a.b.1')) // true
console.log(test.isset('a.b.5')) // false
console.log(test.isset('a.c')) // false
console.log('abv'.isset('0')) // true
This is the most concise equivalent of Php's isset() :
if(var == undefined)
true this is var !isset
false this is var isset