I was trying the useEffect example something like below:
useEffect(async () => {
try {
const response = await fetch(`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`);
const json = await response.json();
setPosts(json.data.children.map(it => it.data));
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}, []);
and I get this warning in my console. But the cleanup is optional for async calls I think. I am not sure why I get this warning. Linking sandbox for examples. https://codesandbox.io/s/24rj871r0p
For React version <=17
I suggest to look at Dan Abramov (one of the React core maintainers) answer here:
I think you're making it more complicated than it needs to be.
function Example() {
const [data, dataSet] = useState<any>(null)
useEffect(() => {
async function fetchMyAPI() {
let response = await fetch('api/data')
response = await response.json()
dataSet(response)
}
fetchMyAPI()
}, [])
return <div>{JSON.stringify(data)}</div>
}
Longer term we'll discourage this pattern because it encourages race conditions. Such as — anything could happen between your call starts and ends, and you could have gotten new props. Instead, we'll recommend Suspense for data fetching which will look more like
const response = MyAPIResource.read();
and no effects. But in the meantime you can move the async stuff to a separate function and call it.
You can read more about experimental suspense here.
If you want to use functions outside with eslint.
function OutsideUsageExample({ userId }) {
const [data, dataSet] = useState<any>(null)
const fetchMyAPI = useCallback(async () => {
let response = await fetch('api/data/' + userId)
response = await response.json()
dataSet(response)
}, [userId]) // if userId changes, useEffect will run again
useEffect(() => {
fetchMyAPI()
}, [fetchMyAPI])
return (
<div>
<div>data: {JSON.stringify(data)}</div>
<div>
<button onClick={fetchMyAPI}>manual fetch</button>
</div>
</div>
)
}
For React version >=18
Starting with React 18 you can also use Suspense, but it's not yet recommended if you are not using frameworks that correctly implement it:
In React 18, you can start using Suspense for data fetching in opinionated frameworks like Relay, Next.js, Hydrogen, or Remix. Ad hoc data fetching with Suspense is technically possible, but still not recommended as a general strategy.
If not part of the framework, you can try some libs that implement it like swr.
Oversimplified example of how suspense works. You need to throw a promise for Suspense to catch it, show fallback component first and render Main component when promise it's resolved.
let fullfilled = false;
let promise;
const fetchData = () => {
if (!fullfilled) {
if (!promise) {
promise = new Promise(async (resolve) => {
const res = await fetch('api/data')
const data = await res.json()
fullfilled = true
resolve(data)
});
}
throw promise
}
};
const Main = () => {
fetchData();
return <div>Loaded</div>;
};
const App = () => (
<Suspense fallback={"Loading..."}>
<Main />
</Suspense>
);
When you use an async function like
async () => {
try {
const response = await fetch(`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`);
const json = await response.json();
setPosts(json.data.children.map(it => it.data));
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}
it returns a promise and useEffect doesn't expect the callback function to return Promise, rather it expects that nothing is returned or a function is returned.
As a workaround for the warning you can use a self invoking async function.
useEffect(() => {
(async function() {
try {
const response = await fetch(
`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`
);
const json = await response.json();
setPosts(json.data.children.map(it => it.data));
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
})();
}, []);
or to make it more cleaner you could define a function and then call it
useEffect(() => {
async function fetchData() {
try {
const response = await fetch(
`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`
);
const json = await response.json();
setPosts(json.data.children.map(it => it.data));
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
};
fetchData();
}, []);
the second solution will make it easier to read and will help you write code to cancel previous requests if a new one is fired or save the latest request response in state
Working codesandbox
Until React provides a better way, you can create a helper, useEffectAsync.js:
import { useEffect } from 'react';
export default function useEffectAsync(effect, inputs) {
useEffect(() => {
effect();
}, inputs);
}
Now you can pass an async function:
useEffectAsync(async () => {
const items = await fetchSomeItems();
console.log(items);
}, []);
Update
If you choose this approach, note that it's bad form. I resort to this when I know it's safe, but it's always bad form and haphazard.
Suspense for Data Fetching, which is still experimental, will solve some of the cases.
In other cases, you can model the async results as events so that you can add or remove a listener based on the component life cycle.
Or you can model the async results as an Observable so that you can subscribe and unsubscribe based on the component life cycle.
You can also use IIFE format as well to keep things short
function Example() {
const [data, dataSet] = useState<any>(null)
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
let response = await fetch('api/data')
response = await response.json()
dataSet(response);
})();
}, [])
return <div>{JSON.stringify(data)}</div>
}
void operator could be used here.
Instead of:
React.useEffect(() => {
async function fetchData() {
}
fetchData();
}, []);
or
React.useEffect(() => {
(async function fetchData() {
})()
}, []);
you could write:
React.useEffect(() => {
void async function fetchData() {
}();
}, []);
It is a little bit cleaner and prettier.
Async effects could cause memory leaks so it is important to perform cleanup on component unmount. In case of fetch this could look like this:
function App() {
const [ data, setData ] = React.useState([]);
React.useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController();
void async function fetchData() {
try {
const url = 'https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1';
const response = await fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal });
setData(await response.json());
} catch (error) {
console.log('error', error);
}
}();
return () => {
abortController.abort(); // cancel pending fetch request on component unmount
};
}, []);
return <pre>{JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}</pre>;
}
I read through this question, and feel the best way to implement useEffect is not mentioned in the answers.
Let's say you have a network call, and would like to do something once you have the response.
For the sake of simplicity, let's store the network response in a state variable.
One might want to use action/reducer to update the store with the network response.
const [data, setData] = useState(null);
/* This would be called on initial page load */
useEffect(()=>{
fetch(`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`)
.then(data => {
setData(data);
})
.catch(err => {
/* perform error handling if desired */
});
}, [])
/* This would be called when store/state data is updated */
useEffect(()=>{
if (data) {
setPosts(data.children.map(it => {
/* do what you want */
}));
}
}, [data]);
Reference => https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-effect.html#tip-optimizing-performance-by-skipping-effects
For other readers, the error can come from the fact that there is no brackets wrapping the async function:
Considering the async function initData
async function initData() {
}
This code will lead to your error:
useEffect(() => initData(), []);
But this one, won't:
useEffect(() => { initData(); }, []);
(Notice the brackets around initData()
For fetching from an external API using React Hooks, you should call a function that fetches from the API inside of the useEffect hook.
Like this:
async function fetchData() {
const res = await fetch("https://swapi.co/api/planets/4/");
res
.json()
.then(res => setPosts(res))
.catch(err => setErrors(err));
}
useEffect(() => {
fetchData();
}, []);
I strongly recommend that you do not define your query inside the useEffect Hook, because it will be re-render infinite times. And since you cannot make the useEffect async, you can make the function inside of it to be async.
In the example shown above, the API call is in another separated async function so it makes sure that the call is async and that it only happens once. Also, the useEffect's dependency array (the []) is empty, which means that it will behave just like the componentDidMount from React Class Components, it will only be executed once when the component is mounted.
For the loading text, you can use React's conditional rendering to validate if your posts are null, if they are, render a loading text, else, show the posts. The else will be true when you finish fetching data from the API and the posts are not null.
{posts === null ? <p> Loading... </p>
: posts.map((post) => (
<Link key={post._id} to={`/blog/${post.slug.current}`}>
<img src={post.mainImage.asset.url} alt={post.mainImage.alt} />
<h2>{post.title}</h2>
</Link>
))}
I see you already are using conditional rendering so I recommend you dive more into it, especially for validating if an object is null or not!
I recommend you read the following articles in case you need more information about consuming an API using Hooks.
https://betterprogramming.pub/how-to-fetch-data-from-an-api-with-react-hooks-9e7202b8afcd
https://reactjs.org/docs/conditional-rendering.html
try
const MyFunctionnalComponent: React.FC = props => {
useEffect(() => {
// Using an IIFE
(async function anyNameFunction() {
await loadContent();
})();
}, []);
return <div></div>;
};
Other answers have been given by many examples and are clearly explained, so I will explain them from the point of view of TypeScript type definition.
The useEffect hook TypeScript signature:
function useEffect(effect: EffectCallback, deps?: DependencyList): void;
The type of effect:
// NOTE: callbacks are _only_ allowed to return either void, or a destructor.
type EffectCallback = () => (void | Destructor);
// Destructors are only allowed to return void.
type Destructor = () => void | { [UNDEFINED_VOID_ONLY]: never };
Now we should know why effect can't be an async function.
useEffect(async () => {
//...
}, [])
The async function will return a JS promise with an implicit undefined value. This is not the expectation of useEffect.
Please try this
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
const products = await api.index()
setFilteredProducts(products)
setProducts(products)
})()
}, [])
To do it properly and avoid errors: "Warning: Can't perform a React state update on an unmounted..."
useEffect(() => {
let mounted = true;
(async () => {
try {
const response = await fetch(`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`);
const json = await response.json();
const newPosts = json.data.children.map(it => it.data);
if (mounted) {
setPosts(newPosts);
}
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
})();
return () => {
mounted = false;
};
}, []);
OR External functions and using an object
useEffect(() => {
let status = { mounted: true };
query(status);
return () => {
status.mounted = false;
};
}, []);
const query = async (status: { mounted: boolean }) => {
try {
const response = await fetch(`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`);
const json = await response.json();
const newPosts = json.data.children.map(it => it.data);
if (status.mounted) {
setPosts(newPosts);
}
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
};
OR AbortController
useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController();
(async () => {
try {
const response = await fetch(`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`, { signal: abortController.signal });
const json = await response.json();
const newPosts = json.data.children.map(it => it.data);
setPosts(newPosts);
} catch (e) {
if(!abortController.signal.aborted){
console.error(e);
}
}
})();
return () => {
abortController.abort();
};
}, []);
I know it is late but just I had the same problem and I wanted to share that I solved it with a function like this!
useEffect(() => {
(async () => {
try {
const response = await fetch(`https://www.reddit.com/r/${subreddit}.json`);
const json = await response.json();
setPosts(json.data.children.map(it => it.data));
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
}
}) ()
}, [])
With useAsyncEffect hook provided by a custom library, safely execution of async code and making requests inside effects become trivially since it makes your code auto-cancellable (this is just one thing from the feature list). Check out the Live Demo with JSON fetching
import React from "react";
import { useAsyncEffect } from "use-async-effect2";
import cpFetch from "cp-fetch";
/*
Notice: the related network request will also be aborted
Checkout your network console
*/
function TestComponent(props) {
const [cancel, done, result, err] = useAsyncEffect(
function* () {
const response = yield cpFetch(props.url).timeout(props.timeout);
return yield response.json();
},
{ states: true, deps: [props.url] }
);
return (
<div className="component">
<div className="caption">useAsyncEffect demo:</div>
<div>
{done ? (err ? err.toString() : JSON.stringify(result)) : "loading..."}
</div>
<button className="btn btn-warning" onClick={cancel} disabled={done}>
Cancel async effect
</button>
</div>
);
}
export default TestComponent;
The same demo using axios
Just a note about HOW AWESOME the purescript language handles this problem of stale effects with Aff monad
WITHOUT PURESCRIPT
you have to use AbortController
function App() {
const [ data, setData ] = React.useState([]);
React.useEffect(() => {
const abortController = new AbortController();
void async function fetchData() {
try {
const url = 'https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1';
const response = await fetch(url, { signal: abortController.signal });
setData(await response.json());
} catch (error) {
console.log('error', error);
}
}();
return () => {
abortController.abort(); // cancel pending fetch request on component unmount
};
}, []);
return <pre>{JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}</pre>;
}
or stale (from NoahZinsmeister/web3-react example)
function Balance() {
const { account, library, chainId } = useWeb3React()
const [balance, setBalance] = React.useState()
React.useEffect((): any => {
if (!!account && !!library) {
let stale = false
library
.getBalance(account)
.then((balance: any) => {
if (!stale) {
setBalance(balance)
}
})
.catch(() => {
if (!stale) {
setBalance(null)
}
})
return () => { // NOTE: will be called every time deps changes
stale = true
setBalance(undefined)
}
}
}, [account, library, chainId]) // ensures refresh if referential identity of library doesn't change across chainIds
...
WITH PURESCRIPT
check how useAff kills it's Aff in the cleanup function
the Aff is implemented as a state machine (without promises)
but what is relevant to us here is that:
the Aff encodes how to stop the Aff - You can put your AbortController here
it will STOP running Effects (not tested) and Affs (it will not run then from the second example, so it will NOT setBalance(balance)) IF the error was thrown TO the fiber OR INSIDE the fiber
Ignore the warning, and use the useEffect hook with an async function like this:
import { useEffect, useState } from "react";
function MyComponent({ objId }) {
const [data, setData] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
if (objId === null || objId === undefined) {
return;
}
async function retrieveObjectData() {
const response = await fetch(`path/to/api/objects/${objId}/`);
const jsonData = response.json();
setData(jsonData);
}
retrieveObjectData();
}, [objId]);
if (objId === null || objId === undefined) {
return (<span>Object ID needs to be set</span>);
}
if (data) {
return (<span>Object ID is {objId}, data is {data}</span>);
}
return (<span>Loading...</span>);
}
The most easy way is to use useAsyncEffect from 'use-async-effect'
You can find it on NPM.
const ProtectedRoute = ({ children }) => {
const [isAuth, setIsAuth] = useState(false);
useAsyncEffect(async () => {
try {
const data = await axios("auth");
console.log(data);
setIsAuth(true);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
}
}, []);
if (!isAuth)
return <Navigate to="/signin" />
return children;
}
Okay so I have this bunch of code that's is thrown on useEffect(() => {...}, []) a.k.a componentDidMount.
// utils/apiCalls.ts
export const loadData = async <T>(
url: string,
errorMsg = "Couldn't retrieve data.",
): Promise<T> => {
const res = await fetch(url, { mode: 'cors', credentials: 'include' });
if (res.ok) return await res.json();
throw new Error(errorMsg);
};
export const loadChat = (id: number): Promise<IChat> => {
return loadData<IChat>(
`${CHAT_API}/${id}/nested/`,
"We couldn't get the chat.",
);
};
// components/MessageContainer.tsx
const MessageContainer = (/* props */) => {
/*
* Some coding...
*/
useEffect(() => {
if (session === null) return;
if (chat === null) {
loadChat(session.chat).then(setChat).catch(alert);
return;
}
// More coding...
}, [session, chat]);
};
The problem comes when I try to test it with #testing-library/react since it gives me this warning Warning: An update to MessagesContainer inside a test was not wrapped in act(...).
How can I make a correct test for this?
Here's the test I have right now.
// tests/MessagesContainer.spec.tsx
describe('MessagesContainer suite', () => {
it('loads messages on mount', () => {
fetchMock.mockResponseOnce(JSON.stringify(ChatMock));
render(
<SessionContext.Provider value={SessionMock}>
<MessagesContainer {...MessagesContainerMockedProps} />
</SessionContext.Provider>,
);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls.length).toEqual(1);
});
});
NOTE: Wrapping render on act did not work.
fetch is async function which finished only all regular script execution ends. You need to really await fetch finished before call expect.
Moreover, it is not recommend to use testing-library as you did. You want to check how element rendered after fetch, write you test accordance to exception result in UI.
For instance, if after fetching you expect something like this:
<span>message</span>
you expect span with message, and test will be:
expect(screen.findByText('message'));
So at the end I used waitFor in order to check if element has been mounted.
// tests/ChatMessagesContainer.spec.tsx
describe('ChatMessagesContainer suite', () => {
it('renders multiple messages', async () => {
const messageMock = Object.assign({}, MessageMock);
messageMock.message = faker.lorem.words();
const chatMock = Object.assign({}, ChatMock);
chatMock.chat_message_set = [MessageMock, messageMock];
fetchMock.mockResponseOnce(JSON.stringify(chatMock));
const { getAllByText } = render(
<AuthContext.Provider value={UserMock}>
<SessionContext.Provider value={SessionMock}>
<MessagesContainer {...MessagesContainerMockedProps} />
</SessionContext.Provider>
</AuthContext.Provider>,
);
// THIS IS THE IMPORTANT PART
expect(await screen.findByText(MessageMock.message)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(getAllByText(MessageMock.author.username).length).toEqual(2);
});
});
This article was really useful Maybe you don't need act.
I'm working on an audio recording class that either runs for an allotted period of time (such as 5 seconds) or can be stopped early by the user.
I'm using setTimeout to define the recording length, which works. However, I'm having trouble getting setTimeout working with a "stop" button. The error is as follows:
Cannot read properties of null (reading 'stop')
When the startRecording function executes, the handleStopRecording function is called which sets a timer with the "stopRecording" function. If the "stopRecording" function is called before the time elapses (by pressing the "stop" button), the function call that was initially in setTimeout will still execute when the timer expires, causing an error.
I tried fixing this by using clearTimeout, but then the "context" of the original function call is lost and we get the same error:
Cannot read properties of null (reading 'stop')
Unless I'm mistaken, I think this is an issue with closure of the setTimeout function - however I'm not sure how to clear the function early with a stop button and limit recording time.
Thank you in advance!
App.js (React.js)
import AudioRecorder from "./audioRecorder";
const App = () => {
const [recordedNameClipURL, setRecordedNameClipURL] = useState(null);
const [timeoutId, setTimeoutId] = useState(null);
const recorder = new AudioRecorder();
const startRecording = () => {
recorder.start();
handleStopRecording();
};
const handleStopRecording = async () => {
const id = setTimeout(stopRecording, 3000);
setTimeoutId(id);
};
const stopRecording = async () => {
clearTimeout(timeoutId);
const response = await recorder.stop();
setRecordedNameClipURL(response);
};
return (
...
);
};
audioRecorder.js
class AudioRecorder {
constructor() {
this.audioRecorder = null;
this.audioChunks = [];
}
initialize = async () => {
try {
await this.isSupported();
const stream = await navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({ audio: true });
this.audioRecorder = new MediaRecorder(stream);
this.audioRecorder.addEventListener("dataavailable", event => {
this.audioChunks.push(event.data);
});
} catch (err) {
console.log(err.message);
}
};
start = async () => {
try {
await this.initialize();
this.audioRecorder.start();
} catch (err) {
console.log(err.message);
}
};
stop = async () => {
try {
this.audioRecorder.stop();
const blob = await this.stopStream();
return URL.createObjectURL(blob);
} catch (err) {
console.log(err.message);
}
};
stopStream = () => {
return new Promise(resolve => {
this.audioRecorder.addEventListener("stop", () => {
const audioBlob = new Blob(this.audioChunks, {
type: this.audioRecorder.mimeType,
});
resolve(audioBlob);
});
});
};
isSupported = () => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
if (navigator.mediaDevices && navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia) {
resolve(true);
}
reject(new Error("getUserMedia not supported on this browser!"));
});
};
}
export default AudioRecorder;
Store the timer inside a React Ref instead
I usually store timeout/interval IDs in a React ref, because storing the handle isn't really "application state" the way that other things are. Sometimes it's needed to avoid render thrashing.
Here's what that looks like:
let timerRef = React.useRef(null)
const handleStopRecording = async () => {
timerRef.current = setTimeout(stopRecording, 3000)
}
const stopRecording = async () => {
clearTimeout(timerRef.current)
timerRef.current = null // good idea to clean up your data
const response = await recorder.stop()
setRecordedNameClipURL(response)
}
Code that needs to know if the timer is running should consult the timerRef; no additional state is needed:
let timerIsRunning = !!timerRef.current
You can try using a boolean value to check if the process is stopped. You can store it in state and change its value when starting or stopping
const [isStopped, setIsStopped] = useState(false);
const handleStopRecording = async () => {
const id = setTimeout(() => {
if(!isStopped){
stopRecording
}
}, 3000);
setTimeoutId(id);
};
I want these two functions to be called every time the component renders, but they are not being executed. And when I put the functions in the dependency array it results in an infinite loop. Any idea why they are not being called?
function PortfolioComponent() {
const [requestedAssets, setRequestedAssets] = useState([]);
const [assets, setAssets] = useState([]);
useEffect(() => {
async function calcValue() {
Promise.all(
requestedAssets.map(async function (asset) {
try {
const response = await axios.get(assetData(asset.AssetId));
let cp = response.data.market_data.current_price.eur;
let value = Number(cp) * Number(asset.Amount);
return { ...asset, value: value, price: cp };
} catch (error) {
console.log(error.response.data.error);
throw error;
}
})
)
.then((newAssetArray) => {
setAssets(newAssetArray);
console.log(newAssetArray);
console.log(assets);
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log(error);
});
}
async function getAssets() {
try {
const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:4200/assets");
// Do as you wish with response here
const assetResponse = response.data.rows;
setRequestedAssets(assetResponse);
console.log(requestedAssets);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error.response.data.error);
}
}
getAssets();
calcValue();
}, []);
Also some weird behaviour I just discovered...
For example, this line of code:
let cp = await response.data.market_data.current_price.eur;
When I remove the await keyword and save it in VS code, the data is retrieved as expected. However, when I refresh the browser the arrays are empty again. The same goes for when I add the await keyword again and save. The same thing happens.
This is what worked for me. So, instead of having a useState variable for requestedAssets, I created a variable inside the getAssets method instead. I'm not exactly sure why this works and not the other way. But, if anybody could explain, that would be great.
function PortfolioComponent() {
//const [requestedAssets, setRequestedAssets] = useState([]);
const [assets, setAssets] = useState([]);
useEffect(() => {
async function getAssets() {
const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:4200/assets");
const requestedAssets = response.data.rows;
console.log(requestedAssets);
Promise.all(
requestedAssets.map(async function (asset) {
try {
const response = await axios.get(assetData(asset.AssetId));
let cp = response.data.market_data.current_price.eur;
let value = Number(cp) * Number(asset.Amount);
return { ...asset, value: value, price: cp };
} catch (error) {
console.log(error.response.data.error);
throw error;
}
})
)
.then((newAssetArray) => {
setAssets(newAssetArray);
console.log(newAssetArray);
console.log(assets);
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log(error);
});
}
getAssets();
}, []);
The recommendation is to declare your functions inside the useEffect, see the official documentation. If you keep scrolling in the docs, they even have an example similar to yours, with an async function.
If, for some reason, you do need to have your function declared outside the useEffect, you can use a useCallback, which allows you to declare them in the dependency array. Something like this:
const getAssets = useCallback(async() => {
try {
const response = await axios.get("http://localhost:4200/assets");
// Do as you wish with response here
const assetResponse = response.data.rows;
setRequestedAssets(assetResponse);
console.log(requestedAssets);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error.response.data.error);
}
}, [requestedAssets])
useEffect(() => {
getAssets()
}, [getAssets])
You can also see the section Do I need to specify functions as effect dependencies or not? in this blog here for more information.
PS: This blog is from Dan Abramov, one of the creators of React, so reliable source ;)
I have a function that sends data to the server and uses props and set.... It is the same throughout few components. It gets called when a certain event occurs.
How can I refactor it out of those components into a single place?
I was thinking about using hooks but because it gets triggered by an event I don't think using a hook is a good approach.
async function sendDataToServer(data) {
const url = new URL(buildUrl());
let timeout = setTimeout(() => setPostingState(SendingState.Sending), 250);
try {
const response = props.id
? await axios.put(url, data)
: await axios.post(url, data);
setPostingState(SendingState.Idle);
props.onSaved(props.id ? props.id : response.data, data);
}
catch (error) {
setPostingState(SendingState.Error);
}
clearTimeout(timeout);
}
function handleSubmit(e) { ... sendDataToServer(data); ... }
You can make a curried function:
// helpers.js
export const genSendDataToServerCallback = ({ setState, onSaved, id }) => async (
data
) => {
const url = new URL(buildUrl());
let timeout = setTimeout(() => setState(SendingState.Sending), 250);
try {
const response = await (props.id
? axios.put(url, data)
: axios.post(url, data));
setState(SendingState.Idle);
onSaved(id ? id : response.data, data);
} catch (error) {
setState(SendingState.Error);
}
clearTimeout(timeout);
};
// Usage in some component
import { genSendDataToServerCallback } from './helpers.js'
const sendDataToServer = genSendDataToServerCallback({setter:setPostingState, ...props});
function handleSubmit(e) { sendDataToServer(data); }
// Usage in other component with different setter
const sendDataToServer = genSendDataToServerCallback({setter:setState, ...props});
function handleSubmit(e) { sendDataToServer(data); }