I'm trying to give to the user the ability to create, drag and connect multiple nodes but I still don't understand how angular render this or the life cycle of components and other, so even after a lot of research, I'm still unable to figure out how to fix the issues listed below.
Basically, I'm to trying to achieve what I already achieved with a simple HTML page, but this time here with Angular and angular is not making it easy for me.
First I was struggling with making the new divs draggable, I managed to do that but now the endpoints do not seem to be able to connect, don't know why or how to fix it.
And even after checking out the doc I still don't understand how stuff in the code like AfterViewInit, ComponentFactoryResolver, parentInjector, resolveComponentFactory work, indeed they solved the draggability issue for me, but don't know why or how they fixed it.
So any help or explanation would reaaaaally appreciated.
The thing is that you are adding endpoints and making nodes draggable using new jsplumb instance created at the moment where that node component is created,
which will result eventually in many jsplumb instances for every node, and that's what seems to be the problem cuz apparently to connect those nodes they must be initialized with the same jsplumb instance : So try creating just one instance (or use the default jsplumb instance) in the parent component (the one holding all the nodes) and then pass it with property binding (#input...) to the newly created nodes to use to become draggable etc.
Related
React documentation seems to be very insistent on the idea that in almost every situation, deriving state from props is a bad idea, an anti-pattern, verbose, likely to cause bugs, hard to understand, and all-around probably going to place a curse on one's lineage for a thousand years.
My use case isn't that weird, so I'm probably doing something wrong, but the suggested patterns for not needing getDerivedStateFromProps() (i.e. making Your object fully controlled or fully uncontrolled) don't seem like good solutions.
The situation: I have a Table component, that takes in an array rows as a prop. Table is used in many different places in my app. I want the Table to be able to handle row-sorting. It is obviously a bad idea to to make whichever parent component controls Table to have to control the sorting*, so fully controlled is out. Making Table fully uncontrolled with a key, also seems like it doesn't make a lot of sense unless the key is the row-data itself-- but my understanding is that key is meant to be simple data (like an id), and actually having to compare all of the rows, which are typically fairly complicated objects, would be pretty inefficient**. Using memoize-one is also not an option as I am working in a closed system and can't import any new libraries.
My current solution: Table has a state variable sortedRows which is updated either whenever sort() is called or whenever props.rows is updated (via getDerivedStateFromProps), by:
Making a shallow copy of props.rows,
in-place sorting that copy and
updating state.sortedRows on that value.
As I see it, there is still only one source of truth here (which is from props), and the state is always just storing a sorted version of that truth (but always dependent on and in sync with it).
Is this solution bad? If so why? What would be a better way to implement this?
Thanks!
Note: I didn't include my code because I am massively simplifying the situation in this prompt-- in reality Table element already exists, and is pretty complicated.
Note 2: I going to ask if I'd run into issues once I want to be able to modify elements in the tables, but I think I'm actually ok, since Table doesn't manage its elements, just arrange and display them, and the buttons for adding and removing elements from a table are not contained within Table, so all that processing is happening at the level of the parent's logic as passed down as part of props.rows
*Having something like <Table rows={sort(rowsFromParent)}/>every time I call Table is repetitive and error-prone, and since clicking on a table header determines sorting column, we'd actually have to have the parent element passing down an onClick() function in every case, which quickly and unnecessarily ramps up complexity).
**There is also a secondary problem to do with rebuilding an element. The table has an infinite scroll, such that when You reach a certain element more rows are loaded in. Using key will destroy the Table component and create a new one, scrolling the user to the top of the new table (which could potentially have many thousands of rows). Something also feels wrong about having to set key in each use of Table, even though resetting based on changes to props.rows seems like it should be intrinsic to how Table works, rather than something that has to be configured each time.
Edit: I have React 15.4, which is before getDerivedStateFromProps was added and using a later version is not an option, so I guess even if I happened to find a valid use case for getDerivedStateFromProps, an alternative would be nice...
I'm creating an app using Nodejs and Vuejs 3. In this app I have made a sidebar that gets all links from a routes file and present them. This sidebar consists in a component that parents a list of other recursive link components.
Since the links are recursive and many, I find it hard to deal with class toggling (active, showing, collapsed, etc.) on each of them and relate them to one another (if one is active the others shouldn't be) using only Vue. Should I use querySelector or any frameworks such as JQuery to handle them or should I try to stick with a pure Vuejs approach?
Edit:
I don't want to gather the community's opinion on it. My aim is to understand pragmatically why I should or shouldn't manipulate the DOM "outside" of Vue.
If you're using Vue then let it be in control of the DOM; mucking around directly will only create conflicts and woe.
(The same applies to other SPA frameworks such as React and Angular.)
The main reason not to touch the DOM is that Vue works by modifying the DOM on its own, and expects to have complete control over it: when rendering components the framework is removing old DOM elements, adding new ones, updating event bindings, etc; and a lot of it is optimized to only update the DOM nodes that need to be updated.
If you go in there and start making direct changes that Vue doesn't know about, then it's likely that your own changes will get overwritten by Vue the next time it needs to render, or that your changes will overwrite bindings that Vue is depending on.
If you're very knowledgeable about Vue's lifecycle and know how to control when it does and does not render, it is possible to work with both together -- but even then it's still not a great idea. Vue and jQuery do very similar things, but in utterly different ways. In jQuery you build up the page and then use DOM traversals and event handlers to modify it; everything lives inside the DOM. In Vue you build up a bunch of components that manage their own state and rendering; the DOM is basically a side effect of the application state.
By trying to use both together you lose most of the advantages of each of them in isolation, and introduce a lot of complexity in having to manage two competing theories of state and render management (not to mention dealing with communicating data between them). Every time I've contemplated embedding a jQuery widget inside a Vue app, it's turned out to be much easier to just rewrite the widget in Vue directly.
This does mean changing a lot of habits about working with the DOM that you may have built up from past jQuery work. It sounds like you're trying to draw the whole DOM and then build your control structure into it afterwards, which is a natural way to think if you're used to jQuery; in Vue you'll want to build all of that logic into components so the framework can do the work for you. I'd suggest making one Vue component for a link that manages its own state for open / closed / active etc, that recurses to its children only when "open". Then just call that once with the top of your nav data instead of trying to manage the whole tree directly after the fact as you would in jQuery.
How to get component handler in Ext Js?
what are the different ways to get them like
this.lookupReference('ref-name-of-class')
this.lookupReferenceholder('class-name')
this.findParentByType('name-of-xtype')
Ext.ComponentQuery.query('alias-or-id')
Ext.getCmp()
this.up()......
this.down().....
Can anyone list all of them?
Gloabal IDs and Ext.getCmp() is a bad practise. It's slow and colliding global IDs will break everything.
container.getComponent() is also a bad idea. If nesting changes, everything will break.
parentComponent.query() should be used when you want to get multiple child components which are relatively close to the parent. If you want to get a single component, you should use down() method instead. There won't be a big performance hit if the child component you are searching is pretty close to the starting node.
lookupReference() or just lookup() is recommended right now but it will only work within single view or viewController class.
I have 2 JS variables. before and after. They contains the SAME html document, but have some modification. About 1%-10% change between them. I want to update the body from before to after. The variablesbefore and after are raw string.
I can do something like that:
document.documentElement.innerHTML=after
The problem is that if I render this way it not look good. The render takes time, and there is a white screen between the renders. I want to show the user 10 modification in a second (video of modifications)
So what I want to do. I want to search and find only the elements that changed only by analyze the HTML text of before and after.
My way of solution:
I can find the changes and the position in the text using Javascript Library for diff & match & patch.
The question is:
After I find the text changes. How to find only the elements who changed. I update only those elements.
I thought, maybe to create a range, that contains every change, and update the range, but how exactly to do that?
If anything unclear, please comment, I will explain better.
I found a very good library for it: https://github.com/patrick-steele-idem/morphdom
Lightweight module for morphing an existing DOM node tree to match a
target DOM node tree. It's fast and works with the real DOM—no virtual
DOM here!
Very easy to use, and doing exactly what I need
If I have understood your question correctly, then what I would have done is,
1) Make a new object (view Object) which will control the rendering of DOM elements. (Similar to MVC)
2) In this object, I would have created 3 functions.
a) init function (contains the event-handlers)
b) render1 function (which will contain elements in before element)
c) render2 function (which will contain elements in after element)
Whenever there is an event where I need to change the HTML of a class/id/body/document, I will change that in init function and call render2 function which contains the after element.
This should not give any error, however the browser has to work to render all the page, but rendering can be divided over multiple elements of document. So, whenever you need to render a part of document, make separate render functions.
p.s. there can be different approaches.
You must implement the LCS(Longest Common Subsequence). To understand better of this algorithm you can watch this youtube video. Also It's easier to first study Longest Common Substring.
I think I have a solution. virtual-dom can do the work for me. I can create two VTree, make a diff, and apply a patch.
From the documentation of virtual-dom:
virtual-dom is what I need.
Manual DOM manipulation is messy and keeping track of the previous DOM
state is hard. A solution to this problem is to write your code as if
you were recreating the entire DOM whenever state changes. Of course,
if you actually recreated the entire DOM every time your application
state changed, your app would be very slow and your input fields would
lose focus.
virtual-dom is a collection of modules designed to provide a
declarative way of representing the DOM for your app. So instead of
updating the DOM when your application state changes, you simply
create a virtual tree or VTree, which looks like the DOM state that
you want. virtual-dom will then figure out how to make the DOM look
like this efficiently without recreating all of the DOM nodes.
virtual-dom allows you to update a view whenever state changes by
creating a full VTree of the view and then patching the DOM
efficiently to look exactly as you described it. This results in
keeping manual DOM manipulation and previous state tracking out of
your application code, promoting clean and maintainable rendering
logic for web applications.
https://github.com/Matt-Esch/virtual-dom
I have a web app built on KO and for the most part it has been a god-sent. However, I have one very frustrating problem.
When I move an element with jQuery from one spot in the DOM to another, the bindings seem to randomly break. Sometimes they survive the move, sometimes they don't. Anyone know what might be causing this? I wish I could give a specific example, but I can't seem to re-create it in a simple case (for a fiddle) and it truly is random (3 in 10 tries).
Is there a way to refresh the bindings in an element?
Cheers,
Had a similar issue. It was happening for me when I was moving the DOM element before applying bindings.
Make sure that all the applyBinding calls are made before you move the DOM element.
That is about all the help I can give without a code sample.
Perhaps try using ko.cleanNode to clear the bindings from the moved element, then ko.applyBindings( model, element ) to rebind them?
See also How to clear/remove observable bindings in Knockout.js?.