This is a follow on to my original question
I am trying to set up IBM's Informix driver for use with NodeJS on MacOS.
After viewing the Readme file for the Informix NPM library, I am a little confused as to what the environment variables are and whether I need to apply them all?
I managed to track down the install location for the SDK files: Applications/IBM/informix and then added this to the ~/.bash_profile file as so:
export INFORMIXDIR=/Applications/IBM/informix
export PATH=$PATH:$INFORMIDIR
Should I change my PATH to include /bin at the end?
I am also confused by the remainder of the statements in the Readme.
I was expecting to set the server name and host dynamically rather than hard-coding them?
Some guidance would be appreciated.
The PATH env variable needs $INFORMIXDIR/bin. (There is nothing in plain $INFORMIXDIR worth running other than the install script).
INFORMIXSERVER and INFORMIXSQLHOSTS may be needed for testing the module, but they are not hardcoded (the module will not store that anywhere)
You will always be able to specify a different INFORMIXSERVER/INFORMIXSQLHOSTS at runtime.
I never tried it on a MacOS, but you may also need to add DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, something like "export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" to your script.
Some MacOS binaries will use DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH instead of LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Related
I have protofiles defined inside a go module and publish this module so servers and go-clients can reference the generated code. Now I also want to have grpc-web client to communicate with the server. grpc-web generates ts and js files, but inorder to use this in browser I need to package this as npm module or copy the generated code into browser repo manually which I do not want to do. What is the standard practice here?
Is there a good solution to package npm & go module from proto files.
Update: I ended up copying over the generated ts/js files into desired location as part of my standard build. Since I have a mono repo this is sufficient right now. Kind of straight forward and also source controlled. Not sure if there is a better idomatic way.
I am making a Electron app with Svelte and Typescript.
I started with this template for that exact purpose, but it disables node.js built-in imports (like fs) in the browser/electron frontend for security.
I do not need this improved security in my project, so I am trying to get node.js fs to work in the Electron browser.
I already modified the Electron Backend script that creates the Browser to re-enable nodeIntegration, and this works: using require("fs") in the Electron browser console logs the fs library.
Using this in the actual typescript frontend code does not work, however. From looking at the bundled JS, it seems like rollup is assuming that the import of fs is just available as a global variable, and trying to guess its name.
When building while importing fs and path, I get the following warnings:
(!) Missing shims for Node.js built-ins
Creating a browser bundle that depends on "path". You might need to include https://github.com/snowpackjs/rollup-plugin-polyfill-node
(!) Missing global variable names
Use output.globals to specify browser global variable names corresponding to external modules
fs (guessing 'fs')
path (guessing 'path')
The first warning suggests a 404 GitHub link that seems to be a polyfill for some Node built-in libraries. This isn't what I want, I want the real node.js fs library. It also informs me that I'm creating a browser bundle - I have tried setting the browser option of #rollup/plugin-node-resolve (used by the template) to false, but this did not help.
The second warning seems to simply inform that it's trying to guess global variable names - which it should not, it should keep the imports.
How do I allow importing Node.js modules here? The linked template project still closely resembles my current one.
Help is greatly appreciated.
Turns out that the deciding factor was the output.format of the rollup.config.js.
This was set to iife, which produced a result without require or import.
Changing it to cjs solves this problem.
Following my previous question, I have followed webpack guidelines of using multiple targets to build my NPM package. https://webpack.js.org/concepts/targets/#multiple-targets
I now have two different output files, index.js which is the browser bundle and index.node.js which is obviously supposed to run on the backend.
The app should run on both browser and Node, the code is mostly reused but there is some big difference around accessing files etc. which means I do need two separate files depending on what platform should the app run.
My question is how should I publish this library in a way that user can consume it like import {//SOME OBJECT} from 'my-published-library' when they import it from NPM regardless if they are using it on the browser or in their node application? If I try that at the moment it always defaults to index.js which works in the browser but not in Node.
Not sure if this is what you're looking for but if you are installing for the browser, the package.json provides a field to set the entry point.
https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#browser
I would like Visual Studio Code to autocomplete all words within the open document instead of the just the scope specific variables it finds. What should I change in the settings?
edit: code version 0.3.0 at time of question.
I just figured it out. This will use all words on the page for auto complete.
// Always include all words from the current document.
"javascript.suggest.alwaysAllWords": true,
// Complete functions with their parameter signature.
"javascript.suggest.completeFunctionCalls": true,
Even though it has been quite some time for this question, I thought I might be of help to anyone else who bumbles across the same question.
So here goes . And this is for the latest version of VS Code as of writing.
For a true intellisense, i.e. for example you intend to get all the methods related to "console" as soon as you press '.' , you can use the respective Typescript definition file.
Now I agree that this fix is targeted at node,and needs the same along with npm on your system. But still, works for all Major JavaScript work you might run across.
on Linux, for this, you'd need "npm" and install TypeScript Definition Manager (tsd) globally.
npm install -g tsd
then within your current project directory (or by changing to the project directory) , open a terminal window and add the following lines
tsd query node --action install
tsd query express --action install
then, as soon as you'll open your .js file in the current directory, you'll get proper autocomplete / intellisense for all DOM object and other possible stuff.
It worked for me, and this is the only reason I use VSCode on linux (for JavaScript at least, even though I like LightTable too)
for further information (and clarifications if I somehow couldnt manage to be clear enough) visit the following link:
Node.js applications on VS Code
I am trying to get Swig (the template language) working on Parse Cloud Code with Express. Parse Cloud Code is a Node/Express host that doesn't allow NPM. Ridiculous, I know. I can still load external files into code with requires statements however, so I think that there's hope I can get this working.
So my question is how do I get the whole entire Swig package into a single JS file that I can include from my Parse Express app like so:
var swig = require("./cloud/swig.js");
Worth noting that Parse breaks normal require statements so that the NPM package as-is doesn't work without modifying each and every single file in the node_modules folder to have cloud in its path (which is why my above path has cloud in it). Parse also chokes while uploading lots of small files. Concatenation is a need on this platform.
I have tried playing with browserify for hours, but no combination of anything I do makes exposes the Swig object when I load the browserified file with the require statement. I think it may be the right option since the Browserified file includes all the files from Swig, but it doesn't expose them externally.
My question is either can this be done in browserify, and if so, how? Or is there another way to concatenate a NPM repo down to one file so it can be more easily included from this platform?
Thanks so much.
Browserify is not the right tool for the job.
As the name implies, browserify is intended to be used to generate files you want to execute in the browser. It walks the require calls from an entrypoint (i.e. some JS file you pass to browserify) and bundles them in an object that maps their names to functions wrapping the modules. It does not expect a require function to already exist and doesn't make any use of it. It substitutes its own implementation of require that only does one thing: look up names from the bundle, execute the matching function and return its exports.
You could theoretically require a browserify bundle, but it would just return an empty object (although it might mess with globals). And in all likelihood it might break because the bundled modules think they are being executed in a browser. This won't do any good.
The only sane option if you want to stick with the host, is to copy over the node_modules folder from your local project folder. This may not work if your computer and the server are not 100% compatible (e.g. 32-bit vs 64-bit, Debian vs RedHat, OSX/Windows vs Linux) but this mostly depends on your exact dependencies (basically anything that is built with node-gyp can be a problem).
Node.js uses the node_modules folder when looking up dependencies in require calls automagically. If you can somehow get a node_modules folder with the right contents on the server, require("foo") will work as long as node_modules contains a module foo.
Ultimately, you are trying to use npm modules in Parse Cloud code and currently it's not possible:
https://parse.com/questions/using-npm-modules-in-cloud-code
But if you are only trying to use Swig, then as a work-around, you can consider using underscore template instead. Parse already includes underscore:
https://parse.com/docs/cloud_modules_guide#underscore