I am using postsConnection query for infinite scroll. It contains variables like after.
After doing an upvote mutation, I want to refetchQueries... like this 👇
const upvote = await client.mutate({
mutation: UPVOTE_MUTATION,
variables: {
postId: this.props.post.id
},
refetchQueries: [
{ query: POST_AUTHOR_QUERY }
]
})
Above code gives error because POST_AUTHOR_QUERY accepts few variables. Here's that query 👇
export const POST_AUTHOR_QUERY = gql`
query POST_AUTHOR_QUERY($authorUsername: String! $orderBy: PostOrderByInput $after: String){
postsAuthorConnection(authorUsername: $authorUsername orderBy: $orderBy after: $after) {
....
}
}
I do not want to add variables manually. Variables are already stored in the cache. How do I reuse them while using refetchQueries???
Here are a few resources I have read about this issue 👇
https://github.com/apollographql/react-apollo/issues/817
https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-client/issues/1900
As mentioned in the issue you linked, you should be able to do the following:
import { getOperationName } from 'apollo-link'
const upvote = await client.mutate({
// other options
refetchQueries={[getOperationName(POST_AUTHOR_QUERY)]}
})
From the docs:
Please note that if you call refetchQueries with an array of strings, then Apollo Client will look for any previously called queries that have the same names as the provided strings. It will then refetch those queries with their current variables.
getOperationName simply parses the document you pass it and extracts the operation name from it. You can, of course, provide the operation name yourself as a string instead, but this way avoids issues if the operation name changes in the future or you fat finger it.
If you don't want to pull in apollo-link, you can also get this via the base graphql package (note that I use optional chaining for convenience:
import { getOperationAST } from 'graphql';
const operationName = getOperationAST(POST_AUTHOR_QUERY)?.name?.value;
// Note that this could technically return `undefined`
const upvote = await client.mutate({
mutation: UPVOTE_MUTATION,
variables: {
postId: this.props.post.id
},
refetchQueries: [operationName]
})
Related
Let's say I have a very basic API with two sets of endpoints. One set queries and mutates properties about a User, which requires a username parameter, and one set queries and mutates properties about a Post, which requires a post ID. (Let's ignore authentication for simplicity.) I don't currently see a good way to implement this in a DRY way.
What makes the most sense to me is to have a separate Context for each set of routes, like this:
// post.ts
export async function createContext(
opts?: trpcExpress.CreateExpressContextOptions
) {
// pass through post id, throw if not present
}
type Context = trpc.inferAsyncReturnType<typeof createContext>;
const router = trpc
.router()
.query("get", {
resolve(req) {
// get post from database
return post;
},
});
// similar thing in user.ts
// server.ts
const trpcRouter = trpc
.router()
.merge("post.", postRouter)
.merge("user.", userRouter);
app.use(
"/trpc",
trpcExpress.createExpressMiddleware({
router: trpcRouter,
createContext,
})
);
This complains about context, and I can't find anything in the tRPC docs about passing a separate context to each router when merging. Middleware doesn't seem to solve the problem either - while I can fetch the post/user in a middleware and pass it on, I don't see any way to require a certain type of input in a middleware. I would have to throw { input: z.string() } or { input: z.number() } on every query/mutation, which of course isn't ideal.
The docs and examples seem pretty lacking for this (presumably common) use case, so what's the best way forward here?
This functionality has been added in (unreleased as of writing) v10. https://trpc.io/docs/v10/procedures#multiple-input-parsers
const roomProcedure = t.procedure.input(
z.object({
roomId: z.string(),
}),
);
const appRouter = t.router({
sendMessage: roomProcedure
.input(
z.object({
text: z.string(),
}),
)
.mutation(({ input }) => {
// input: { roomId: string; text: string }
}),
});
I am new to React Native, please provide some Github link or your own code for reference. Consider me as a beginner in RN.
I found very less open support for RN, Mobx State tree, Ignite and all, so not just post and get API reference, if you find anything helpful related to these above-mentioned topics, Feel free to share.
Thanks in advance.
Mobx State Tree, With Ignite Bowler you would have api.ts file where you can specify API calls.
async getUser(userToken: string): Promise<Types.GetUserResult> {
// make the api call
const response: ApiResponse<any> = await this.apisauce.post(`api/v1/sales/login?authCode=${userToken}`)
if (!response.ok) {
const problem = getGeneralApiProblem(response)
if (problem) return problem
}
// transform the data into the format we are expecting
try {
try {
const rawUser = response.data
console.log('rawUser'+ rawUser)
const user: UserSnapshot = convertRawUserToUserStore(rawUser)
return { kind: "ok", user }
console.log({ user })
} catch (e) {
__DEV__ && console.tron.log(e.message)
return { kind: "bad-data" }
}
} catch {
return { kind: "bad-data" }
}
}
Consider, we will be getting user data from this API call,
you can notice that there is UserSnapshot which belongs to User Model, Snapshot will save the data automatically, you don't need Aysnc storage to save or retrieve data.
I have a very basic feathers service which stores data in mongoose using the feathers-mongoose package. The issue is with the get functionality. My model is as follows:
module.exports = function (app) {
const mongooseClient = app.get('mongooseClient');
const { Schema } = mongooseClient;
const messages = new Schema({
message: { type: String, required: true }
}, {
timestamps: true
});
return mongooseClient.model('messages', messages);
};
When the a user runs a GET command :
curl http://localhost:3030/messages/test
I have the following requirements
This essentially tries to convert test to ObjectID. What i would
like it to do is to run a query against the message attribute
{message : "test"} , i am not sure how i can achieve this. There is
not enough documentation for to understand to write or change this
in the hooks. Can some one please help
I want to return a custom error code (http) when a row is not found or does not match some of my criterias. How can i achive this?
Thanks
In a Feathers before hook you can set context.result in which case the original database call will be skipped. So the flow is
In a before get hook, try to find the message by name
If it exists set context.result to what was found
Otherwise do nothing which will return the original get by id
This is how it looks:
async context => {
const messages = context.service.find({
...context.params,
query: {
$limit: 1,
name: context.id
}
});
if (messages.total > 0) {
context.result = messages.data[0];
}
return context;
}
How to create custom errors and set the error code is documented in the Errors API.
This is the method I'm using, pretty simple.
DailyCountTest: function (){
this.$store.dispatch("DailyCountAction")
let NewPatientTest = this.$store.getters.NewPatientCountGET
console.log(NewPatientTest)
}
The getter gets that data from a simple action that calls a django backend API.
I'm attempting to do some charting with the data so I need to assign them to variables. The only problem is I can't access the variables.
This is what the console looks like
And this is what it looks like expanded.
You can see the contents, but I also see empty brackets. Would anyone know how I could access those values? I've tried a bunch of map.(Object) examples and couldn't get any success with them.
Would anyone have any recommendation on how I can manipulate this array to get the contents?
Thanks!
Here is the Vuex path for the API data
Action:
DailyCountAction ({ commit }) {
axios({
method: "get",
url: "http://127.0.0.1:8000/MonthlyCountByDay/",
auth: {
username: "test",
password: "test"
}
}).then(response => {
commit('DailyCountMutation', response.data)
})
},
Mutation:
DailyCountMutation(state, DailyCount) {
const NewPatientMap = new Map(Object.entries(DailyCount));
NewPatientMap.forEach((value, key) => {
var NewPatientCycle = value['Current_Cycle_Date']
state.DailyCount.push(NewPatientCycle)
});
}
Getter:
NewPatientCountGET : state => {
return state.DailyCount
}
State:
DailyCount: []
This particular description of your problem caught my eye:
The getter gets that data from a simple action that calls a django backend API
That, to me, implies an asynchronous action and you might be getting a race condition. Would you be able to post a sample of your getter function to confirm my suspicion?
If that getter does indeed rely on an action to populate its contents, perhaps something to the effect of the following might do?
DailyCountTest: async () => {
await this.$store.dispatch('DailyCountAction')
await this.$store.dispatch('ActionThatPopulatesNewPatientCount')
let NewPatientTest = this.$store.getters.NewPatientCountGET
// ... do whatever with resulting array
}
You can also try with a computer property. You can import mapGetters
import { mapGetters } from 'vuex'
and later in computed properties:
computed: {
...mapGetters(['NewPatientCountGET'])
}
then you can use your NewPatientCountGET and it will update whenever the value changes in the store. (for example when the api returns a new value)
Hope that makes sense
I really like the graphQL pattern of having components request their own data, but some data properties are expensive to compute and so I want to localize the logic (and code) to do so.
function CheaterList({ data: { PlayerList: players } }) {
return (
<ul>
{players && players.map(({ name, isCheater }) => (
<li key={name}>{name} seems to be a {isCheater ? 'cheater' : 'normal player'}</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
export default graphql(gql`
query GetList {
PlayerList {
name,
isCheater
}
}
`)(CheaterList);
The schema looks like:
type Queries {
PlayerList: [Player]
}
type Player {
name: String,
kills: Integer,
deaths: Integer
}
And so I want to add the isCheater property to Player and have its code be:
function computeIsCheater(player: Player){
// This is a simplified version of what it actually is for the sake of the example
return player.deaths == 0 || (player.kills / player.deaths) > 20;
}
How would I do that?
Another way of phrasing this would be: how do I get the isCheater property to look as though it came from the backend? (However, if an optimistic update were applied the function should rerun on the new data)
Note: Local state management is now baked into apollo-client -- there's no need to add a separate link in order to make use of local resolvers and the #client directive. For an example of mixing local and remote fields, check out of the docs. Original answer follows.
As long as you're using Apollo 2.0, this should be possible by utilizing apollo-link-state as outlined in the docs.
Modify your client configuration to include apollo-link-state:
import { withClientState } from 'apollo-link-state';
const stateLink = withClientState({
cache, //same cache object you pass to the client constructor
resolvers: linkStateResolvers,
});
const client = new ApolloClient({
cache,
link: ApolloLink.from([stateLink, new HttpLink()]),
});
Define your client-only resolvers:
const linkStateResolvers = {
Player: {
isCheater: (player, args, ctx) => {
return player.deaths == 0 || (player.kills / player.deaths) > 20
}
}
}
Use the #client directive in your query
export default graphql(gql`
query GetList {
PlayerList {
name
kills
deaths
isCheater #client
}
}
`)(CheaterList);
However, it appears that combining local and remote fields in a single query is currently broken. There's an open issue here that you can track.